DOCSLIB.ORG

Fact Sheet #7, Fiscal Year (Fy) 2016 April 29, 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fact Sheet #7, Fiscal Year (Fy) 2016 April 29, 2016 SOUTH SUDAN - CRISIS FACT SHEET #7, FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2016 APRIL 29, 2016 NUMBERS AT USAID/OFDA1 FUNDING HIGHLIGHTS A GLANCE BY SECTOR IN FY 2016 The USG announces more than $86 million in additional humanitarian 5% 5% * 7% 24% funding for South Sudan on April 27 1,696,962 USAID/FFP partner WFP reaches Individuals Displaced in 9% nearly 65 percent of emergency food South Sudan since December 15, 2013 9% pre-positioning target as of April 26 23% *Includes approximately 9,400 displaced persons in Abyei Area. 18% OCHA – February 2016 Logistics & Relief Commodities (24%) HUMANITARIAN FUNDING Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (23%) FOR THE SOUTH SUDAN RESPONSE Health (18%) Agriculture & Food Security (9%) USAID/OFDA1 $38,664,077 179,836 Humanitarian Coordination & Information Management (9%) Protection (7%) USAID/FFP2 $189,978,217 Individuals Seeking Refuge at Nutrition (5%) UNMISS Bases Shelter & Settlements (5%) State/PRM3 $46,050,000 UNMISS – April 21, 2016 $274,692,294 TOTAL USG HUMANITARIAN FUNDING * 2 836,148 USAID/FFP FUNDING FOR THE SOUTH SUDAN RESPONSE TO BY MODALITY IN FY 2016 DATE IN FY 2016 Refugees from South Sudan in Neighboring Countries 100% $1,582,870,463 *Includes an unconfirmed number TOTAL USG HUMANITARIAN FUNDING of refugees, returnees, and U.S. In-Kind Food Aid (100%) FOR THE SOUTH SUDAN RESPONSE IN nomads who have fled to Sudan. FY 2014, FY 2015, AND FY 2016 TO DATE, UNHCR – April 22, 2016 INCLUDES FUNDING FOR SOUTH SUDANESE REFUGEES IN NEIGHBORING COUNTRIES 270,767 KEY DEVELOPMENTS Refugees from Neighboring On April 27, the U.S. Government (USG) announced more than $86 million in additional Countries in South Sudan humanitarian funding for South Sudan, bringing the total USG contribution since the UNHCR – March 31, 2016 beginning of the crisis to nearly $1.6 billion. The USAID/OFDA and State/PRM funding will support life-saving assistance—including logistics, nutrition, protection, and food security and livelihoods support, as well as health, camp management, and water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) services—for internally displaced populations, refugees seeking asylum in South Sudan, and South Sudanese refugees in neighboring countries. Riek Machar returned to South Sudan’s capital city of Juba and was sworn in as First Vice President on April 26. Government of the Republic of South Sudan (GoRSS) President Salva Kiir appointed a Transitional Government of National Unity (TGNU) on April 28. Countrywide relief activities continued uninterrupted as of April 29. 1 USAID’s Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance (USAID/OFDA) 2 USAID’s Office of Food for Peace (USAID/FFP) 3 U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (State/PRM) 1 INSECURITY, DISPLACEMENT, AND HUMANITARIAN ACCESS Humanitarians continue to face attacks, harassment, and violence that hinder their ability to respond to populations in need of assistance throughout South Sudan. On April 12, unidentified armed actors ambushed a group of Danish Refugee Council relief workers traveling in marked vehicles in southern Central Equatoria State. The ensuing attack resulted in the death of two South Sudanese relief workers. Since the start of the current conflict, at least 52 humanitarian workers have been killed in South Sudan. Aid organizations have reported nearly 1,900 humanitarian access incidents, including arrests or detention of staff, attacks on international non-governmental organization (NGO) compounds, and cases of violence against humanitarian personnel and assets since January 2014, according to the UN. On April 7, an interagency humanitarian mission accessed Western Bahr el Ghazal State’s Mboro town in Wau County, which hosts approximately 8,000 internally displaced persons (IDPs), following several security-related delays in March. During the mission, relief staff conducted a rapid needs assessment and delivered nutrition and medical supplies. The interagency team found that the escalation of conflict in Wau County since November 2015 had damaged or destroyed many houses and community facilities in Mboro and prompted the majority of the town’s residents to flee to various locations, with some IDPs sheltering in nearby forests, according to the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA). Relief staff provided humanitarian assistance to IDPs present during the mission, and identified health, nutrition, and shelter assistance as priority needs in Mboro. Relief organizations also commenced humanitarian assessments in Wau County’s Wau town and Gette payam in neighbouring Jur River County in Western Bahr el Ghazal on April 6 and 11, respectively, to verify the number of IDPs sheltering in the two locations and identify urgent humanitarian needs. As of April 16, approximately 5,000 IDPs were sheltering in Gette, and relief actors were providing health and nutrition assistance to the conflict-affected population. To ensure appropriateness and scale of aid provision, the International Organization for Migration (IOM) is verifying the number of IDPs at various displacement sites throughout South Sudan, including UN Mission in the Republic of South Sudan (UNMISS) protection of civilian (PoC) sites. As of April 12, IOM had completed a verification of the population in the UNMISS PoC site in Melut County, Upper Nile State, and was verifying the population in the UNMISS PoC site in Bentiu town, Unity State. IOM also plans to verify the population sheltering in the UNMISS PoC site in Malakal town, Upper Nile, as well as the number of displaced individuals in Malakal and the Wau Shilluk area, Upper Nile. On March 23, the South Sudan Inter-Cluster Working Group (ICWG) completed a humanitarian mission to Bentiu town and surrounding areas in Unity, including Nhialdu, Nimne, and Kuach towns, in an effort to assess the security situation and feasibility of scaling up static humanitarian presence and assistance. The mission identified approximately 30,000 IDPs in Nhialdu and approximately 15,000 IDPs in Nimne and Kuach, where priority needs include emergency food, nutrition, and protection support. FOOD SECURITY Conflict continues to negatively affect food security and livelihoods in South Sudan, resulting in increasing levels of acute malnutrition in many conflict-affected areas. Between April and September, the food security situation will likely deteriorate further in the Greater Upper Nile region, which comprises Jonglei, Unity, and Upper Nile states, due to ongoing insecurity, loss of income-generating activities, and economic and political instability, according to the USAID- funded Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET). In Unity, populations currently experiencing Emergency—IPC 4—levels of food insecurity may face an elevated risk for high levels of acute malnutrition and increased mortality.4 Without increased humanitarian assistance, food security conditions in northern Jonglei and parts of Upper Nile will also deteriorate to Emergency levels, according to FEWS NET. Economic instability—leading to high food prices and poor market functioning—is also affecting urban populations that are dependent on markets for food, such as in South Sudan’s capital city of Juba. In response, USAID/FFP partners WFP and the UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF) are scaling up the provision of ready-to-use supplementary food 4 The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) is a standardized tool that aims to classify the severity and magnitude of food insecurity. The IPC scale, which is comparable across countries, ranges from Minimal—IPC I—to Famine—IPC 5. 2 for the treatment of moderate acute malnutrition and ready-to-use therapeutic food for the treatment of severe acute malnutrition via nutrition programs in eight locations in and around Juba. Deteriorating food insecurity has driven more than 55,000 people from Northern Bahr el Ghazal State to Sudan since January 2016, the UN reports. In response, WFP and partner agencies conducted general food distributions, reaching approximately 29,300 people in Northern Bahr el Ghazal—including an estimated 14,500 people in Aweil North County, approximately 7,400 people in Aweil Center County, and 7,400 people in Aweil East County—as of April 18. WFP had also begun moving 20,000 metric tons (MT) of cereals to respond to food insecurity throughout the Greater Bahr el Ghazal region, including Lakes, Northern Bahr el Ghazal, Warrap, and Western Bahr el Ghazal states, as of April 19. Overall, WFP has delivered more than 110,000 MT of food commodities throughout South Sudan via road, air, and river to date in 2016, of which an estimated 78,400 MT of food had reached pre-positioning locations as of April 26— or approximately 65 percent of WFP’s target for the 2015/2016 pre-positioning period. Limited improvement in humanitarian access in recent months enabled WFP to pre-position an increased proportion of food commodities via road in difficult-to-access areas that previously required mobile team or air operations, including in Upper Nile’s Mathiang and Udier towns. WFP distributed more than 21,500 MT of food to approximately 1.6 million people throughout South Sudan in March—the largest amount of food delivered in a one-month period since December 2013. While WFP typically distributes 65 to 70 percent of targeted monthly caseloads due to logistical constraints, the UN agency distributed nearly 100 percent of the March target because of enhanced overland mobility and improved access into Jonglei and Unity. From March 31–April 19, WFP mobile teams delivered 5,300 MT of emergency food assistance to approximately 300,000 people in Unity and Upper Nile, including three missions via road and air that delivered an estimated 1,300 MT of food assistance to 70,500 beneficiaries. Despite these successes, road conditions on two key transport routes in South Sudan have begun to deteriorate due to the onset of the rainy season and may close by the end of April, according to WFP. The affected routes include the Bor–Pibor road in Jonglei and the road between Juba and Terekeka town in Central Equatoria, which is the main access route to the Western Corridor and a major artery for transporting humanitarian cargo.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • South Sudan - Crisis Fact Sheet #2, Fiscal Year (Fy) 2019 December 7, 2018
    SOUTH SUDAN - CRISIS FACT SHEET #2, FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2019 DECEMBER 7, 2018 NUMBERS AT USAID/OFDA1 FUNDING HIGHLIGHTS A GLANCE BY SECTOR IN FY 2018 Relief actor records at least 150 GBV cases in Bentiu during a 12-day period 5% 7% 20% UN records two aid worker deaths, 60 7 million 7% Estimated People in South humanitarian access incidents in October 10% Sudan Requiring Humanitarian USAID/FFP partner reaches 2.3 million Assistance 19% 2018 Humanitarian Response Plan – people with assistance in October December 2017 15% 17% HUMANITARIAN FUNDING Logistics Support & Relief Commodities (20%) Water, Sanitation & Hygiene (19%) FOR THE SOUTH SUDAN RESPONSE 6.1 million Health (17%) Nutrition (15%) USAID/OFDA $135,187,409 Estimated People in Need of Protection (10%) Food Assistance in South Sudan Agriculture & Food Security (7%) USAID/FFP $402,253,743 IPC Technical Working Group – Humanitarian Coordination & Info Management (7%) September 2018 Shelter & Settlements (5%) 3 State/PRM $91,553,826 USAID/FFP2 FUNDING $628,994,9784 2 million BY MODALITY IN FY 2018 1% TOTAL USG HUMANITARIAN FUNDING FOR THE SOUTH SUDAN CRISIS IN FY 2018 Estimated IDPs in 84% 9% 5% South Sudan OCHA – November 8, 2018 U.S. In-Kind Food Aid (84%) 1% $3,760,121,951 Local & Regional Food Procurement (9%) TOTAL USG HUMANITARIAN FUNDING FOR THE Complementary Services (5%) SOUTH SUDAN RESPONSE IN FY 2014–2018, Cash Transfers for Food (1%) INCLUDING FUNDING FOR SOUTH SUDANESE Food Vouchers (1%) REFUGEES IN NEIGHBORING COUNTRIES 194,900 Estimated Individuals Seeking Refuge at UNMISS Bases KEY DEVELOPMENTS UNMISS – November 15, 2018 During a 12-day period in late November, non-governmental organization (NGO) Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) recorded at least 150 gender-based violence (GBV) cases in Unity State’s Bentiu town, representing a significant increase from the approximately 2.2 million 100 GBV cases that MSF recorded in Bentiu between January and October.
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan IDSR Bulletin Week 18, 03
    South Sudan Integrated Disease surveillance and response (IDSR) Epidemiological Bulletin Week 18, 2021 ( May 03- May 09) Major epidemiological highlights in week 18 highlights of 2021 ⚫In week 18, 2021 IDSR reporting timeliness was 88% and completeness was 95% at health facility level. Timeliness was 79% and Completeness was 93% for EWARS partners supported sites were at 84% ⚫Of the 86 alerts in week 18, 2021; 74% were verified 5% were risk assessed and 5% required a response . Malaria (28), AWD (25), ARI (6), measles (2) and bloody diarrhea (16) were the most frequent alerts in week 18, 2021 ⚫Confirmed Rubella Outbreak in Nagero County, Western Equatoria State as all 3 samples tested positive for Rubella IgM ⚫Malaria remains the top cause of morbidity and accounted for 50,747 cases (49.7% of OPD cases) ⚫Total of 10 641 COVID-19 confirmed cases and 115 deaths, CFR of 1.09% ⚫Other hazards include floods (unseasonal) in over 4 counties; HEV in Bentiu PoC and Rubella in 2 counties. SURVEILLANCE PERFORMANCE For the Integrated Disease Surveillance (IDSR) network and Early warning alert and response network (EWARN) IDSR timeliness performance at State level for week 18 & 17 of 2021 Both timeliness of IDSR reporting (supported by EWARS mobile) at health facility level in week 18 and 17 were both 88%. 8 states were above the target of 80% except for 2 states Upper Nile and WBGZ Reporting challenges: Insecurity, internet access and new partners IDSR completeness performance at State level for week 18 & 17 of 2021 No. of HFs No. of HFs Number of
    [Show full text]
  • Village Assessment Survey Wau County
    Village Assessment Survey COUNTY ATLAS 2013 Wau County Western Bahr el Ghazal State Village Assessment Survey The Village Assessment Survey (VAS) has been used by IOM since 2007 and is a comprehensive data source for South Sudan that provides detailed information on access to basic services, infra- structure and other key indicators essential to informing the development of efficient reintegra- tion programmes. The most recent VAS represents IOM’s largest effort to date encompassing 30 priority counties comprising of 871 bomas, 197 payams, 468 health facilities, and 1,277 primary schools. There was a particular emphasis on assessing payams outside state capitals, where com- paratively fewer comprehensive assessments have been carried out. IOM conducted the assess- ment in priority counties where an estimated 72% of the returnee population (based on esti- mates as of 2012) has resettled. The county atlas provides spatial data at the boma level and should be used in conjunction with the VAS county profile. All Counties Assessed Planning Map and Dashboard..…………Page 1 WASH Section…………..………...Page 14 - 20 General Section…………...……...Page 2 - 5 Natural Source of Water……...……….…..Page 14 Main Ethnicities and Languages.………...Page 2 Water Point and Physical Accessibility….…Page 15 Infrastructure and Services……...............Page 3 Water Management & Conflict....….………Page 16 Land Ownership and Settlement Type ….Page 4 WASH Education...….……………….…….Page 17 Returnee Land Allocation Status..……...Page 5 Latrine Type and Use...………....………….Page 18 Livelihood
    [Show full text]
  • Deim Zubier Rapid Displacement Brief Raja County, Western Bahr El Ghazal, South Sudan, April 2018
    Deim Zubier Rapid Displacement Brief Raja County, Western Bahr el Ghazal, South Sudan, April 2018 Introduction • This outbreak of conflict follows a previous smaller clash between armed actors in Deim Zubier at the end of February, On 5 April, 2018, conflict broke out between armed actors in Deim Zubier in which caused over 800 IDPs to flee from Deim Zubier south to Raja County, Western Bahr el Ghazal (WBeG) displacing people from the Tambura and Nagero Counties in Western Equatoria State, during region. Internally displaced persons (IDPs) travelled to multiple locations which 14 people, many of whom were children, died as a result within WBeG and to neighbouring states and countries (See Map 1). Due of fatigue and exhaustion on the way.1,2 to the rapid onset of the conflict, little is known about the displacement routes or needs of the affected population. To fill this knowledge gap, • Many who remained in Deim Zubier following the most recent REACH carried out sudden onset remote displacement tracking in Wau clash intended to leave but were unable to pay transportation Protection of Civilian (PoC) site to provide an initial overview of population fees. Due to immobility from perceived insecurity, those who movement. From 18 April to 4 May, REACH conducted 4 focus group stayed reportedly had minimal access to food, markets, clean discussions (FGDs), which included participatory mapping exercises in water, education and other basic services. Wau PoC site with 10 male and 19 female IDPs recently displaced from • The loss of seeds from looting, destruction of property and Deim Zubier, totalling 29 participants.
    [Show full text]
  • Sudan: Land Policy State Consultation – Wau, Western Bahr El Ghazal
    SUDAN LAND POLICY STATE CONSULTATION – WAU, WESTERN BAHR EL GHAZAL WORKSHOP REPORT, JUNE 2009 i JUNE 2009USAID | Sudan Property Rights Program This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development by ARD. Prepared by: USAID Sudan Property Rights Program ARD, Inc P.O. Box 1397 Burlington, Vermont 05402 USA Prepared for: The Southern Sudan Land Commission under USAID Task Order No. 02; Contract No. EPP-I-00-06-00008-00 LAND POLICY STATE CONSULTATION – WAU, WESTERN BAHR EL GHAZAL WORKSHOP REPORT, JUNE 2009 JUNE 2009 DISCLAIMER The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................. III EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... V 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 2.0 PURPOSE OF THE CONSULTATIVE WORKSHOP ............................................. 3 3.0 WORKSHOP PREPARATION AND ATTENDANCE ............................................ 5 4.0 WORKSHOP METHODOLOGY ................................................................................ 7 4.1 PRESENTATIONS: .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Bahr El Ghazal, South Sudan July - September 2018
    Situation Overview: Greater Bahr el Ghazal, South Sudan July - September 2018 Introduction. Map 1: REACH assessment coverage of the GBeG region, July (A), August (B) and September 2018 (C) C Continued conflict, displacement and A B environmental shocks negatively impacted access to food and restricted the ability for communities to meet basic needs in Greater Bahr el Ghazal (GBeG) between July and September 2018. Waves of displacement 0 - 4.9% in Western Bahr el Ghazal (WBeG) and 5 - 10% flooding in Northern Bahr el Ghazal (NBeG), 11 - 20% WBeG and Greater Tonj area1 (GTA) 21 - 50% threatened overall food security in the region. 51 - 100% Assessed settlement dynamics across the GBeG region from July in WBeG and NBeG states reporting the REACH has been assessing hard-to-reach to September 2018. The first section analyses presence of IDPs increased during the areas in WBeG since April 2017, NBeG since 742 settlements in 11 counties in the GBeG displacement and population movement and assessment period, whereas GTA saw a March 2018 and GTA since January 2018. region. To ensure an up to date understanding the second section focuses on access to food decrease in assessed settlements reporting The data was collected through key informant of current displacement dynamics and and basic services for both internally displaced IDPs living in the community, from 60% interviews on a monthly basis from settlements humanitarian conditions in settlements across WBeG State, NBeG State and GTA, REACH persons (IDPs) and local populations in Figure 1: Proportion of assessed settlements in Jur River, Wau, and Raja counties in WBeG assessed settlements in the GBeG region.
    [Show full text]
  • E4220v2 Republic of South Sudan Ministry of Agriculture & Forestry
    E4220v2 Republic of South Sudan Ministry of Agriculture & Forestry Public Disclosure Authorized EMERGENCY FOOD CRISIS RESPONSE PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT May 2013 Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS III EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 4 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT AND THE STUDY 5 2. AN OVERVIEW OF THE AGRICULTURE SECTOR IN SOUTH SUDAN 14 3. REVIEW OF THE RELEVANT POLICIES, LAWS AND REGULATIONS 19 4. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ACTIVITIES AND IMPLEMENTATION APPROACH 26 6. PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS AND DISCLOSURE 48 7. PEST MANAGEMENT 52 8. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL ISSUES, IMPACTS AND MITIGATION 55 9. ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING PLAN 60 10. SUMMARY OF THE STUDY 66 11. REFERENCES 69 ii LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AAHI Action Africa Help International CES Central Equatoria State CPA Comprehensive Peace Agreement EA Environmental Assessment EFCRP Emergency Food Crisis and Response Project ESA Environmental and Social Assessment ESAF Environment and Social Assessment Framework ESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment ESMF Environment and Social Management Framework ESMP Environment and Social Management Plan FAO Food and Agriculture Organization GDP Gross Domestic Product GFRP Global Food Crisis Response Program GNI Gross National Income GoSS Government of Southern Sudan IPM Integrated Pest Management IPMF Integrated Pest Management Framework IPMP Integrated Peoples Management
    [Show full text]
  • Inter-Agency Rapid Needs Assessment Report: Gette, Jur River (12 April 2016)
    Inter-agency Rapid Needs Assessment Report: Gette, Jur River (12 April 2016) Aweil South Background Northern Bahr el Ghazal Gogrial West Gogrial East Gette Boma is within Udici Payam in Jur River County, Aweil Centre P Kuajok 50 km outside Wau town. Insecurity and fighting in the neighbouring payam of Bessilia in Wau County Udici ! since February 2016 has affected Gette. Cross-border Warrap !Makot 5,570 incursions by armed actors pursing cattle keepers has Kiyango ! ! Gette ! Tonj North ! Jur River caused people bordering Jur River County and Wau Kondongo Kwot Besselia County in the south to flee their villages. Those that ! PWau Tonj East were displaced within Udici Payam established four Baggari ! new settlements along the main Wau and Aweil Road. Wau On 12 April, humanitarian partners travelled from Wau Western Bahr el Ghazal to undertake an Inter-agency Rapid Needs Assessment (IRNA) mission in Gette Boma and respond to pressing Tonj South needs. This IRNA report outlines the key findings from Upper Nile Unity NBeG the assessment team. WBeG Warrap Jonglei Lakes Western Equatoria Eastern Equatoria Central Equatoria Nagero Key overview of findings CRISIS TIMELINE The IRNA team found that there were an estimated 5,570 Internally 2012 Displaced People (IDP) sheltering in Udici Payam, Jur River County, Wau County headquarters is who had fled from the villages of Kiyanngo, Bararoute, Kwot, moved from Wau Town to Kondogo, and Makot. IDPs reported that their livelihoods had been Baggari. Protests follow, destroyed and that they were surviving on wild food collection and reducing meals and food intake. Although arable land was available, resulting in death of 12 youth.
    [Show full text]
  • 5.6 Disaster Preparedness and Resilience
    Disasters, Conflict, KNOWLEDGE NOTE Public Disclosure Authorized and Displacement Intersectional Risks in South Sudan Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized © 2020 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org This work is a product of the staff of the World Bank with external contributions. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of the World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. The term ‘disaster’ in this publication refers to events caused by natural hazards. Rights and Permissions The material in this work is subject to copyright. Because the World Bank encourages dissemination of its knowledge, this work may be reproduced, in whole or in part, for noncommercial purposes as long as full attribution to this work is given. Any queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to World Bank Publications, The World Bank Group, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax: 202-522-2625; e-mail: [email protected] Cover page: A community in Ulang County (Upper Nile State) affected by seasonal flooding in 2019. Photograph taken by the Shelter and Non Food Items (SNFI) team during flood response (09 October 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan Crisis Fact Sheet #9
    SOUTH SUDAN - CRISIS FACT SHEET #9, FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2018 JULY 6, 2018 NUMBERS AT USAID/OFDA1 FUNDING HIGHLIGHTS A GLANCE BY SECTOR IN FY 2018 UN records at least seven aid worker deaths since January 7% 3% ICRC delivers humanitarian assistance in 7 million 8% 35% Leer for the first time since early April Estimated People in South Sudan Requiring Humanitarian 15% USAID/FFP partner WFP reaches Assistance 2.6 million people with emergency food 2018 Humanitarian Response Plan – assistance in May December 2017 15% 17% HUMANITARIAN FUNDING 5.3 million Logistics Support & Relief Commodities (35%) FOR THE SOUTH SUDAN RESPONSE Water, Sanitation & Hygiene (17%) Estimated People in Need of Nutrition (15%) USAID/OFDA $34,969,837 Food Assistance in South Sudan Health (15%) USAID/FFP $192,227,559 IPC Technical Working Group – Agriculture & Food Security (8%) January 2018 Humanitarian Coordination and Info Management (7%) State/PRM3 $21,708,795 Protection (3%) 4 USAID/FFP2 FUNDING $248,906,191 1.9 million TOTAL USG HUMANITARIAN FUNDING FOR THE BY MODALITY IN FY 2018 1% Estimated IDPs in SOUTH SUDAN CRISIS IN FY 2018 South Sudan 71% 18% 7% OCHA – May 2018 $3,202,750,306 3% U.S. In-Kind Food Aid (71%) TOTAL USG HUMANITARIAN FUNDING FOR THE SOUTH SUDAN RESPONSE IN FY 2014–2018, Local & Regional Food Procurement (18%) INCLUDING FUNDING FOR SOUTH SUDANESE 210,500 Complementary Services (7%) REFUGEES IN NEIGHBORING COUNTRIES Estimated Individuals Seeking Cash Transfers for Food (3%) Refuge at UNMISS Bases Food Vouchers (<1%) UNMISS – June 28, 2018 KEY DEVELOPMENTS 2.49 On June 28, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) distributed emergency food commodities and shelter supplies to vulnerable households in Unity State’s Leer million County, marking ICRC’s first delivery of assistance in the county since fighting began in Estimated Refugees and Asylum April.
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan - Crisis Fact Sheet #9, Fiscal Year (Fy) 2019 August 14, 2019
    SOUTH SUDAN - CRISIS FACT SHEET #9, FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2019 AUGUST 14, 2019 NUMBERS AT USAID/OFDA1 FUNDING HIGHLIGHTS BY SECTOR IN FYS 2018–2019 A GLANCE • Health actors in South Sudan scale up EVD preparedness efforts near DRC 4% 1% 7% and Uganda borders 7.2 million 24% 7% • Escalated insecurity hinders Estimated People in humanitarian access in Central Equatoria South Sudan Requiring 11% • Humanitarian Assistance FEWS NET projects Crisis and OCHA Situation Report – August 2, 2019 18% Emergency levels of acute food 13% insecurity will persist through January 15% HUMANITARIAN FUNDING 7 million FOR THE SOUTH SUDAN RESPONSE IN Logistics Support & Relief Commodities (24%) FYS 2018–2019 Estimated People in Need of Water, Sanitation & Hygiene (18%) Food Assistance in South Sudan Health (15%) USAID/OFDA $266,899,023 Nutrition (13%) IPC Technical Working Group – July 2019 Protection (11%) USAID/FFP $773,056,592 Agriculture & Food Security (7%) Humanitarian Coordination & Information Management (7%) State/PRM3 $91,553,826 Shelter & Settlements (4%) Other (1%) 1.9 million 4 Estimated Number of IDPs 2 $1,131,509,441 USAID/FFP FUNDING TOTAL USG HUMANITARIAN FUNDING FOR THE in South Sudan BY MODALITY IN FYS 2018–2019 SOUTH SUDAN RESPONSE IN FYs 2018–2019 UN – August 2, 2019 58% 34% 6% $4,262,636,414 U.S. In-Kind Food Aid (58%) 2% TOTAL USG HUMANITARIAN FUNDING FOR THE Local & Regional Food Procurement (34%) SOUTH SUDAN RESPONSE IN FYs 2014–2019, INCLUDING FUNDING FOR SOUTH SUDANESE 185,000 Complementary Services (6%) REFUGEES IN NEIGHBORING COUNTRIES Estimated Individuals Seeking Cash Transfers for Food, Food Vouchers (2%) Refuge at UNMISS Bases UNMISS – August 5, 2019 KEY DEVELOPMENTS • Health actors are scaling up Ebola virus disease (EVD) preparedness activities in areas of 2.3 million South Sudan located near the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and Uganda Estimated Refugees and Asylum amid ongoing concerns of possible cross-border EVD transmission, the Government of Seekers from South Sudan in the Republic of South Sudan (GoRSS) Ministry of Health (MoH) reports.
    [Show full text]
  • Intention- Wau Perception Displacement Sites Survey
    Published 25 March 2019 IOM DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX SOUTH SUDAN INTENTION- WAU PERCEPTION DISPLACEMENT SITES SURVEY Dec 2019 - Jan 2020 Udici Atido Alel Chok Abu-shaka SOUTH SUDAN Marial Bai Wau POC AA Kuom St Joseph Wau North Cathedral Besselia Lokoloko Ngolimbo Achot Wau South Nazareth Abu-shaka WAU Masna Momoi Bringi Bagari Wathalelo Ngodakala Rocrocdong 0 1.5 3 6 Kilometers Bagari Bagari Bussere 1 CONTENTS Arrival time ..............................................................................................8 Methodology .....................................................................................................2 Housing, Land and Property ........................................................... 10 KEY FINDINGS ...............................................................................................3 Livelihoods ............................................................................................. 10 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ........................................4 INTENTIONS ............................................................................................... 11 KEY FINDINGS BY MAIN DESTINATIONS .......................................5 Intentions across all respondents ................................................ 11 Jur River as preferred destination ....................................................5 No intention to return ...................................................................... 12 Urban Wau County as preferred destination ............................5 Intending
    [Show full text]