DOCSLIB.ORG

And 'Of the Kings of Israel': What Sort of Books

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
And 'Of the Kings of Israel': What Sort of Books THE BOOKS OF THE CHRONICLES ‘OF THE KINGS OF JUDAH’ AND ‘OF THE KINGS OF ISRAEL’: WHAT SORT OF BOOKS WERE THEY? by MENAHEM HARAN Jerusalem For Frank Moore Cross in friendship and respect I The ‘Book ( sepher) of the Chronicles of the Kings of Judah’ is referred to fteen times by our Books of Kings (the rst time in 1 Kgs. xiv 29) and the ‘Book of the Chronicles of the Kings of Israel’ eigh- teen times (the rst reference being 1 Kgs. xiv 19). The ‘Book of the Acts (diºerê, but LXXL ²merÇn = hayyˆmîm l e, i.e. the Chronicles) of Solomon’ (1 Kgs. xi 41) seems to have been a book of the same kind as the rst two, but con ned to the reign of Solomon. The Books of Kings refer to these books in a standard and schematic formula: ‘And the other events of PN’s reign’— sometimes adding some deed of his (e.g. with respect to Jeroboam son of Nebat [1 Kgs. xiv 19], to Asa [1 Kgs. xv 23], to Baasha [1 Kgs. xvi 5], to Zimri [1 Kgs. xvi 20])— ‘are recorded in the Book of the Chronicles of the Kings of Israel’ (or ‘of the Kings of Judah’). Just what were these ‘chronicles’ and what purpose did they serve? Some scholars say that they were annals, pure and simple, i.e. an oYcial record of the events of the king’s reign. 1 Yet it is evident that 1 Scholars had already reached this conclusion in the 19th century. For our time see, e.g. A. Jepsen, Die Quellen des Königsbuches (Halle [Saale], 1953 [1956]), pp. 54-60; T.N.D. Mettinger, Solomonic State O Ycials (Lund, 1971), pp. 38-40. Mettinger opines that the annals were one chronicle written in two columns (on the model of chronicles in the Akkadian literature). Jepsen classi es the archive-derived material in Kings into ‘a synchronistic chronicle’ (S) and ‘annals’ (A). J.A. Montgomery ( The Books of Kings , ICC [New York, 1951], pp. 43-44) also shares the opinion that the Books of the Chronicles of the Kings of Judah and of Israel were o Ycial annals. He believes, however, that © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 1999 Vetus Testamentum XLIX, 2 the books of the chronicles 157 the greater part of the material of the Books of Kings is narrative or literary, and de nitely not annalistic in character. Moreover, from the manner in which reference is made to these two ‘chronicles’, it would seem that access to them was open to anyone who wanted. This has led other scholars to the conclusion that the ‘Books of the Chronicles’ were not annals but books of literature in the form of uno Ycial historical surveys that were based on annal-like records. 2 According to this sug- gestion, there was indeed a link between the Deuteronomistic editors and the royal annals, but an indirect one, mediated through the Books of the ‘Chronicles of the Kings’. What the Deuteronomistic editors took from those ‘Books’ was mainly annalistic items (e.g. the names of the mother of the Judaen Kings) and chronological data, on which skeleton they proceeded to construct the canonical Books of Kings. To Montgomery goes the credit for rst pointing out the distinct annal-like (his word is ‘archival’) character of the matters mentioned in our Books of Kings with reference to the Books of the Chronicles of the Kings of Israel and Judah. These references to ‘the other events in [so-and-so]’s reign’ are occasionally supplemented by annal-like items, such as ‘the might’ of the king and his achievements (1 Kgs. xv 23; xvi 27; xxii 46; 2 Kgs. xiv 28, etc.), his feats of construction (1 Kgs. xv 23; xxii 39; 2 Kgs. xx 20), his revolt against his predecessor (1 Kgs. xvi 20; 2 Kgs. xv 15), the illnesses of his old age (1 Kgs. xv 23; cf. 2 Kgs. xv 5). Montgomery also puts his nger on statements loosely connected to their context, whose content and wording also suggest annals material (e.g. 1 Kgs. ix 25, ‘and he kept the House in repair’; also 1 Kgs. xxii 49-50; 2 Kgs. i 1; xv 19-20, etc.). A date which belongs to the context and precedes the event to be narrated also indicates, in Montgomery’s opinion, the archival character of the report in ques- tion. Instead of the date there may come expressions such as ‘then’, the narratives between 1 Kgs. xii and 2 Kgs. xvii were attached to the chronicles in Josiah’s time. 2 The notion that the three afore-mentioned books were not annals was rst expressed in the 19th century but not really in a proper critical manner. See, e.g., G.F. Keil, The Books of Kings (Edinburgh, 1872), pp. 12-4. Keil assumed that the writers of the ‘Chronicles’ were prophets, relying on prophetical compositions, among them the exten- sive corpus of Elijah and Elisha narratives. In our time, critically-based reiterations of this notion have come from, in particular, the following scholars: O. Eissfeldt, Einleitung in das AT (Tübingen, 31964), pp. 64-5; M. Noth, Überlieferungsgeschichtliche Studien (Tübingen, 1957), pp. 66-7, 72-5; idem, Könige I, BK (Neukirchen-Vluyn, 1968), p. 327; S. Mowinckel, ‘Israelite Historiography’, ASTI 2 (1963), pp. 7-8, 12-13, 17-21; J. Van Seters, In Search of History (New Haven, 1983 [1997]), pp. 292-302. Noth laid special emphasis on the chronological data that the Deuteronomistic editor obtained from these chronicles..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • God Disciplines a Rebellious People
    Unit .15 Session .05 God Disciplines a Rebellious People Scripture 2 Chronicles 36:11-21 11 Zedekiah was twenty-one years old when he began until there was no remedy. 17 Therefore he brought to reign, and he reigned eleven years in Jerusalem. up against them the king of the Chaldeans, who killed 12 He did what was evil in the sight of the Lord his their young men with the sword in the house of their God. He did not humble himself before Jeremiah the sanctuary and had no compassion on young man or prophet, who spoke from the mouth of the Lord. 13 virgin, old man or aged. He gave them all into his hand. He also rebelled against King Nebuchadnezzar, who 18 And all the vessels of the house of God, great and had made him swear by God. He stiffened his neck small, and the treasures of the house of the Lord, and and hardened his heart against turning to the Lord, the treasures of the king and of his princes, all these he the God of Israel. 14 All the officers of the priests brought to Babylon. 19 And they burned the house of and the people likewise were exceedingly unfaithful, God and broke down the wall of Jerusalem and burned following all the abominations of the nations. And they all its palaces with fire and destroyed all its precious polluted the house of the Lord that he had made holy vessels. 20 He took into exile in Babylon those who in Jerusalem. 15 TheLord , the God of their fathers, had escaped from the sword, and they became servants sent persistently to them by his messengers, because to him and to his sons until the establishment of the he had compassion on his people and on his dwelling kingdom of Persia, 21 to fulfill the word of the Lord place.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Kings 15-16
    Book of First Kings I Kings 15-16 The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly This section of 1 Kings gives a brief survey of the kings of Judah and Israel from 913 to 885 B.C. From this point through the rest of 1 Kings, a cross reference is used in introducing each new king of Judah and Israel. When each king begins his reign it is connected to the reigning king of the other kingdom. Eight of Judah’s kings were good, but most were bad kings. Four kings of Judah (Asa, Jehoshaphat, Hezekiah, and Josiah) led notable religious revivals at critical times to preserve the nation. All of Israel’s kings were bad, but some were worse than others. Two Kings of Judah (15:1-24) – One bad king and one good king 1. King Abijam (15:1-8) – He reigned over Judah 3 years (913-911 B.C.). Two bad things are said about him: A. He walked in the sins for his father – Like father, like son. B. He was not devoted to the Lord – He was not loyal to God (“his heart was not perfect”) as David had been. The same thing was said about Solomon (11:4). David was mostly faithful to God except in the matter of Uriah. He took Uriah’s wife and then he took Uriah’s life. For the most part, David did what was right in the eyes of God. Proverbs 15:3 The eyes of the LORD are in every place, beholding the evil and the good.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 the Assyrian Empire, the Conquest of Israel, and the Colonization of Judah 37 I
    ISRAEL AND EMPIRE ii ISRAEL AND EMPIRE A Postcolonial History of Israel and Early Judaism Leo G. Perdue and Warren Carter Edited by Coleman A. Baker LONDON • NEW DELHI • NEW YORK • SYDNEY 1 Bloomsbury T&T Clark An imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc Imprint previously known as T&T Clark 50 Bedford Square 1385 Broadway London New York WC1B 3DP NY 10018 UK USA www.bloomsbury.com Bloomsbury, T&T Clark and the Diana logo are trademarks of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc First published 2015 © Leo G. Perdue, Warren Carter and Coleman A. Baker, 2015 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publishers. Leo G. Perdue, Warren Carter and Coleman A. Baker have asserted their rights under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as Authors of this work. No responsibility for loss caused to any individual or organization acting on or refraining from action as a result of the material in this publication can be accepted by Bloomsbury or the authors. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN: HB: 978-0-56705-409-8 PB: 978-0-56724-328-7 ePDF: 978-0-56728-051-0 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Typeset by Forthcoming Publications (www.forthpub.com) 1 Contents Abbreviations vii Preface ix Introduction: Empires, Colonies, and Postcolonial Interpretation 1 I.
    [Show full text]
  • THE GOOD KINGS of JUDAH Learning to Avert Moral Failure from Eight Good Men Who Didn’T
    THE GOOD KINGS OF JUDAH learning to avert moral failure from eight good men who didn’t . give me an undivided heart . Psalm 86:11 Answer Guide ©2013 Stan Key. Reproduction of all or any substantial part of these materials is prohibited except for personal, individual use. No part of these materials may be distributed or copied for any other purpose without written permission. Unless otherwise noted, scripture quotations are from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version® (ESV®), copyright ©2001 by Crossway, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved. For information about these or other additional study materials, contact: PO Box 7 Wilmore, KY 43090 859-858-4222 800‒530‒5673 [email protected] www.francisasburysociety.com To follow Stan on his blog, visit: http://pastorkeynotes.wordpress.com. Downloadable PDFs of both student and answer guides for this study are available at www.francisasburysociety.com/stan-key. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION TO THE GOOD KINGS OF JUDAH .......................1 SOLOMON ................................................................................3 ASA .........................................................................................5 JEHOSHAPHAT .........................................................................7 JOASH .....................................................................................10 AMAZIAH .................................................................................12 UZZIAH....................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Josiah's Reform in Judah (2 Kgs 22-23//2 Chr 34- 35: Implications For
    770 Olanisebe, “Josiah’s Reform in Judah,” OTE 30/3 (2017): 770-784 Josiah’s Reform in Judah (2 Kgs 22-23//2 Chr 34- 35: Implications for Nigeria in Pursuit of a Sus- tained Democracy SAMSON OLUSINA OLANISEBE (DEPARTMENT OF RELIGIOUS STUDIES, OBAFEMI AWOLOWO UNIVERSITY, NIGERIA) ABSTRACT Josiah was a young boy of eight years when he assumed the position of leadership over the Southern kingdom of Israel. Before his ascen- sion to the throne, there were many structural defects in the kingdom. The immediate task before him was how to restructure and re-engi- neer the socio-religious decay he met on the ground, to which he responded promptly and with a record of success. This paper, there- fore, through narrative analysis, identifies the leadership and follow- ership qualities that assisted Josiah in his reform policy in Southern Israel and recommends, through content analysis, the imbibing of those qualities by the Nigerian leaders and citizenry in their quest for a sustained democracy. KEYWORDS: Democracy; followers; Josiah’s reform; leadership role; Nigeria. A INTRODUCTION The concept of democracy is traceable to the ancient Greeks, specifically the city-state of Athens in the fifth century BCE. The word democracy is derived from two Greek words “demos” meaning the people and “kratos,” meaning “power” or “rule.”1 Defining democracy is a herculean task because there is no universally acceptable definition. However, it has been defined by various schol- ars based on the features that a true democracy must have. Those features include a system where people rule themselves, a society based on equal opportunities and individual merit rather than hierarchy or privilege, a system of welfare and redistribution aimed at narrowing social inequalities, decision making based on majority rule, to mention just a few.2 In the words of Badru, democracy is a sys- tem of government that enables both the leaders and the citizens to be conscious * Article submitted: 26/01/2017; peer-reviewed: 20/03/2017; accepted: 11/07/2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Zedekiah: Last King of Judah
    ZEDEKIAH: LAST KING OF JUDAH SHIMON BAKON Zedekiah was the last King of Jud ah, in whose reign it collapsed under the onslaught of Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon, on the Ninth Day of Ab in the year 586 BCE. We may gain some better understanding of this disaster if we summarize the cataclysmic events that preceded it. A little less than 30 years earlier there had been two regional powers, Assy- ria to the north of Judah and Egypt to the south. The balance of power be- came disturbed when a new colossus began to stride across the entire Near East – Babylon. In 712, it destroyed Nineveh, the capital of Assyria. This was the beginning of the upheavals that led to the destruction of Judah. Egypt, deeply concerned about this new threat, moved northward to bolster the wan- ing power of Assyria. It set on the march in 608, moving via Judah. Josiah, a truly righteous king, attempted to stop the Egyptian forces, and was mortally wounded in battle at Megiddo. KING JOSIAH AND HIS SONS (Josiah killed in battle with Egypt in 608 BCE) JEHOAHAZ (608 BCE) JEHOIAKIM (608-597) (crowned by the (crowned by Neco of Egypt am-ha’aretz in 608 but became vassal and deposed by Egypt the of Babylonia) same year) JEHOIACHIN (597) ZEDEKIAH (597-586) Being a sympathizer (crowned by Babylon) of Egypt, he was deposed by Babylon) 1 The Judean am-haaretz – the landed gentry – put Josiah's son Jehoahaz on the throne, but Necho, the Egyptian pharaoh, hurried to depose him and carry him off into captivity.
    [Show full text]
  • Chart of the Kings of Israel and Judah
    The Kings of Israel & Judah Why Study the Kings? Chart of the Kings Questions for Discussion The Heritage of Jesus Host: Alan's Gleanings Alphabetical List of the Kings A Comment about Names God's Message of Salvation Kings of the United Kingdom (c 1025-925 BC) Relationship to God's King Previous King Judgment Saul none did evil Ishbosheth* son (unknown) David none did right Solomon did right in youth, son (AKA Jedidiah) evil in old age * The kingdom was divided during Ishbosheth's reign; David was king over the tribe of Judah. Kings of Judah (c 925-586 BC) Kings of Israel (c 925-721 BC) Relationship to God's Relationship to God's King King Previous King Judgment Previous King Judgment Rehoboam son did evil Abijam Jeroboam servant did evil son did evil (AKA Abijah) Nadab son did evil Baasha none did evil Asa son did right Elah son did evil Zimri captain did evil Omri captain did evil Ahab son did evil Jehoshaphat son did right Ahaziah son did evil Jehoram son did evil (AKA Joram) Jehoram son of Ahab did evil Ahaziah (AKA Joram) (AKA Azariah son did evil or Jehoahaz) Athaliah mother did evil Jehu captain mixed Joash did right in youth, son of Ahaziah Jehoahaz son did evil (AKA Jehoash) evil in old age Joash did right in youth, son did evil Amaziah son (AKA Jehoash) evil in old age Jeroboam II son did evil Zachariah son did evil did evil Uzziah Shallum none son did right (surmised) (AKA Azariah) Menahem none did evil Pekahiah son did evil Jotham son did right Pekah captain did evil Ahaz son did evil Hoshea none did evil Hezekiah son did right Manasseh son did evil Amon son did evil Josiah son did right Jehoahaz son did evil (AKA Shallum) Jehoiakim Assyrian captivity son of Josiah did evil (AKA Eliakim) Jehoiachin (AKA Coniah son did evil or Jeconiah) Zedekiah son of Josiah did evil (AKA Mattaniah) Babylonian captivity Color Code Legend: King did right King did evil Other.
    [Show full text]
  • What Did King Josiah Reform?
    Chapter 17 What Did King Josiah Reform? Margaret Barker King Josiah changed the religion of Israel in 623 BC. According to the Old Testament account in 2 Kings 23, he removed all manner of idolatrous items from the temple and purified his kingdom of Canaanite practices. Temple vessels made for Baal, Asherah, and the host of heaven were removed, idolatrous priests were deposed, the Asherah itself was taken from the temple and burned, and much more besides. An old law book had been discovered in the temple, and this had prompted the king to bring the religion of his kingdom into line with the requirements of that book (2 Kings 22:8–13; 2 Chronicles 34:14–20).1 There could be only one temple, it stated, and so all other places of sacrificial worship had to be destroyed (Deuteronomy 12:1–5). The law book is easily recognizable as Deuteronomy, and so King Josiah’s purge is usually known as the Deuteronomic reform of the temple. In 598 BC, twenty-five years after the work of Josiah, Jerusalem was attacked by the Babylonians under King Nebuchadnezzar (2 Kings 24:10– 16; 25:1–9); eleven years after the first attack, they returned to destroy the city and the temple (586 BC). Refugees fled south to Egypt, and we read in the book of Jeremiah how they would not accept the prophet’s interpretation of the disaster (Jeremiah 44:16–19). Jeremiah insisted that Jerusalem had fallen because of the sins of her people, but the refugees said it had fallen because of Josiah.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Ancient Israel's Politics
    Evolution of Ancient Israel’s Politics Tribes, Monarchies, and Foreign Empires Three Significant Eras • In his writings on the Politics of Ancient Israel sourced from the U of A website, Norman Gottwald suggests ancient Israel moved through three main ‘zones’ (or eras) of political structure. • Tribal Era (1,200 BCE – 1,000 BCE) • Monarchic Era (1,000 BCE – 586 BCE) • Colonial Era (586 BCE – 135 CE) • Brief revival of the monarchy under the Hasmonean Dynasty, 140 - 63 B.C.E • He notes that these eras did not totally displace one another, but overlapped and aspects of each period can be seen in future eras. - https://bibleinterp.arizona.edu/articles/2001/politics Tribal Era (1,200 BCE – 1,000 BCE) • Jacob (renamed Israel) had 12 sons known for 12 tribes of Israel. • No tribe for Joseph but tribes for his sons Ephraim and Manasseh • Tribe of Levi owned no property. They were the Priestly tribe supported by the other tribes. • “The Lord said to Aaron (Levite), ‘You will have no inheritance in their land, nor will you have any share among them; I am your share and your inheritance among the Israelites.” Numbers 18:20 From Tribes to Nation-building • In Ancient Israel’s history up to the Exodus, leadership was Tribal. • Leadership within the tribe was inherited similarly to everything else, emphasis on the oldest living son. • Beginning with the Exodus, we have our first example of ‘national unity’. Moses was God’s chosen leader to bring the Hebrew people out of slavery to the Holy Land, where they are referenced as Israelites.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 15 • Session 2 the Southern Kingdom of Judah
    Unit 15 • Session 2 The Southern Kingdom of Judah Use Week of: Unit 15 • Session 2 Hezekiah and Josiah BIBLE PASSAGE: 2 Chronicles 29; 34–35 STORY POINT: God planned to send Jesus. KEY PASSAGE: 2 Chronicles 7:14b CHRIST CONNECTION: Jesus always obeyed God perfectly. Bible Story for Toddlers King Hezekiah of Judah loved God, just like his grandfather King David. Hezekiah said to the priests, “Our fathers turned away from God, and He punished them. Get rid of every evil thing in the temple. We will obey God.” The priests did what Hezekiah said, and the people loved God again. After Hezekiah died, though, the people forgot God. Many years later, Josiah became king when he was a boy. Josiah loved God too. Josiah repaired the temple and found God’s law. The priest read the words of God’s law to Josiah. Then Josiah invited all the people to the temple and read the law to them. While Josiah was king, the people loved God and obeyed Him. Babies Gospel Gems * Hezekiah and Josiah loved God. * Judah obeyed God when the king obeyed Him. * Jesus helps His people obey God. Additional resources are available at gospelproject.com. For free training and session-by-session help, visit MinistryGrid.com/gospelproject. Babies & Toddlers Leader Guide 38 Unit 15 • Session 2 BABIES Activities Look in the Bible Provide hand-size Bibles for babies to handle. Open your Bible to 2 Chronicles 29. Show the Bible story picture as you say the gospel gems in a soothing voice. Read the key passage card.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ironic Death of Josiah in 2 Chronicles
    3mitchell.qxd 5/1/2006 9:29 AM Page 421 The Ironic Death of Josiah in 2 Chronicles CHRISTINE MITCHELL St. Andrew’s College Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W3, Canada MOST RECENT STUDIES OF 2 Chronicles 34–35 have attempted to deal with various historical issues of the text.1 Although many of the insights from these studies are valuable, very little attention has been paid to reading Josiah’s rule and death in 2 Chronicles from a literary perspective.2 In this contribution, there- fore, I propose a literary reading of 2 Chronicles 34–35 on the terms of the Chron- I would like to thank Gary Knoppers and Ehud Ben Zvi for their comments on this article as it evolved. Any errors that remain are, of course, my own. 1 The discussion began with H. G. M. Williamson, “The Death of Josiah and the Continuing Development of the Deuteronomic History,” VT 32 (1982) 242-48, and continued with C. T. Begg, “The Death of Josiah: Another View,” VT 37 (1987) 1-8; H. G. M. Williamson, “Reliving the Death of Josiah: A Reply to C. T. Begg,” VT 37 (1987) 9-15; Zipora Talshir, “The Three Deaths of Josiah and the Strata of Biblical Historiography (2 Kings xxiii 29-30; 2 Chronicles xxxv 20-5; 1 Esdras i 23-31),” VT 46 (1996) 213-36; Baruch Halpern, “Why Manasseh Is Blamed for the Babylonian Exile: The Evolution of a Biblical Tradition,” VT 48 (1998) 473-514. The work in these articles is often in conversation with that of C.
    [Show full text]
  • Scripturalization and the Aaronide Dynasties
    Journal of Hebrew Scriptures Volume 13, Article 6 DOI:10.5508/jhs.2013.v13.a6 Scripturalization and the Aaronide Dynasties JAMES W. WATTS Articles in JHS are being indexed in the ATLA Religion Database, RAMBI, and BiBIL. Their abstracts appear in Religious and Theological Abstracts. The journal is archived by Library and Archives Canada and is accessible for consultation and research at the Electronic Collection site maintained by Library and Archives Canada. ISSN 1203–1542 http://www.jhsonline.org and http://purl.org/jhs SCRIPTURALIZATION AND THE AARONIDE DYNASTIES JAMES W. WATTS SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY Evidence for the history of the Second Temple priesthood is very fragmentary and incomplete. To the best of our knowledge, how- ever, worship at the temple site in Jerusalem was controlled from ca. 535 to 172 B.C.E. by a single family, the descendants of Jeshua ben Jehozadak, the first post-exilic high priest (the family is often called the Oniads). After disruptions caused by civil wars and the Maccabean Revolt, they were replaced by another family, the Hasmoneans, who controlled the high priesthood from at least 152 until 37 B.C.E. Sources from the Second Temple period indicate that both families claimed descent from Israel’s first high priest, Aaron.1 1 For the Oniads’ genealogical claims, see 1 Chr 6:3–15; Ezra 2:36; 3:2. For the Hasmoneans’ claims, see 1 Macc 2:1; cf. 1 Chr 24:7. No ancient source challenges these claims, but many modern historians have been skeptical of them (e.g., J. Wellhausen, Prolegomena to the History of Israel [trans.
    [Show full text]