Addendum to Our Submission of 7 Dec: Terms of Reference

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Addendum to Our Submission of 7 Dec: Terms of Reference Addendum to our submission of 7th Dec: Terms of Reference I would like to address the following Terms of Reference of the Committee: • Strategic approach to managing the species at a regional level. The public health issues outlined hereunder suggest that both Federal and State authorities need to co-ordinate a strategic national approach to species management as a matter of priority. Risks to Public health and Agriculture: We currently have flying-fox roosts in some 56 regional centres and city suburbs spread over 3,000km of the East coast, that have given their local council cause to get permits to carry out management activity. Some of these roosts are seasonal, some permanent. We tolerate the existence of these bio-concentrations on the basis that flying-fox populations are ‘critical’ to the health of our rain forests and native bush. They may very well be important, perhaps critical, but in either case it is evident that the health and survival of the species and benefit to our bush, is NOT dependent on camps or roosts being located and tolerated in residential or suburban areas. As a community we would quite reasonably prohibit the establishment of a poultry farm with say 20,000 birds in the middle of a regional CBD or a Sydney suburb, citing noise, smell, disease risk etc. However recently a bio-concentration of around 300,000 animals was allowed to build up in a small regional town, Batemans Bay, before effective dispersal action was taken. These animals are known disease carriers and in recent years have caused human fatalities in Australia from both ABLV (Australian Bat Lyssavirus) and Hendra. Anecdotal evidence from Batemans Bay suggests a markedly higher incidence of lung infections related to the recent invasion of GHFF, particularly amongst the elderly. Known diseases carried by flying-fox populations: • Hendra virus • Australian Bat Lyssavirus (ABLV) • Menangle virus • Ross River fever (with a high incidence in Cairns corresponding to a high FF concentration) • Japanese encephalitis If these animals (in conjunction with mosquitoes as happens with Ross River fever) were to become a vector for any other contagious disease (think Avian flu or Zika), then the bulk of our East coast population and possibly our agricultural industry would be at increased, and I submit, unacceptable risk. (Attachment: Journal of Applied Microbiology 2003, 94, 59S–69S Managing emerging diseases borne by fruit bats (flying foxes), with particular reference to henipaviruses and Australian bat lyssavirus.) Journal of Applied Microbiology 2003, 94, 59S–69S Managing emerging diseases borne by fruit bats (flying foxes), with particular reference to henipaviruses and Australian bat lyssavirus J.S. Mackenzie1, H.E. Field2 and K.J. Guyatt1 1Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, School of Molecular and Microbial Sciences, University of Queensland and 2Department of Primary Industries, Animal Research Institute, Moorooka, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia 1. Summary, 59S 5. Other viruses associated with fruit bats, 63S 2. Introduction, 59S 6. Management strategies, 63S 3. Emergence of three new viruses in Australia, 60S 6.1 Current strategies, 64S 3.1 Hendra virus, 60S 6.1.1 Hendra and Nipah viruses, 64S 3.2 Australian Bat Lyssavirus (ABLV), 61S 6.1.2 Menangle virus, 64S 3.3 Menangle virus, 61S 6.1.3 Australian bat lyssavirus, 64S 4. The emergence of similar viruses in Southeast Asia, 62S 6.2 Future strategies, 65S 4.1 Nipah virus, 62S 6.2.1 Can a vaccination strategy be developed to 4.2 Tioman virus, 63S control emerging viral diseases in flying 4.3 Australian bat lyssavirus, 63S foxes? 65S 4.4 Comments on the possible emergence of other 7. Acknowledgements, 66S related viruses, 63S 8. References, 66S to flying foxes, and better disease recognition and diagnosis, 1. SUMMARY and for ABLV specifically, the use of rabies vaccine for pre- Since 1994, a number of novel viruses have been described and post-exposure prophylaxis. Finally, an intriguing and from bats in Australia and Malaysia, particularly from fruit long-term strategy is that of wildlife immunization through bats belonging to the genus Pteropus (flying foxes), and it is plant-derived vaccination. probable that related viruses will be found in other countries across the geographical range of other members of the 2. INTRODUCTION genus. These viruses include Hendra and Nipah viruses, members of a new genus, Henipaviruses, within the family The role of bats in the maintenance and spread of various Paramyxoviridae; Menangle and Tioman viruses, new viral diseases is well established (Sulkin and Allen 1974; members of the Rubulavirus genus within the Paramyxov- Ghatak et al. 2000; McColl et al. 2000), including members iridae; and Australian bat lyssavirus (ABLV), a member of of the alphaviruses, flaviviruses, rhabdoviruses and arenavi- the Lyssavirus genus in the family Rhabdoviridae. All but ruses. However, much of the information has been gathered Tioman virus are known to be associated with human and/ from members of the suborder Microchiroptera (insectivor- or livestock diseases. The isolation, disease associations and ous and vampire bats), and relatively little information is biological properties of the viruses are described, and are available for the members of the suborder Megachiroptera used as the basis for developing management strategies (fruit bats and flying foxes). Lyssaviruses, particularly for disease prevention or control. These strategies are rabies, have been identified in six genera of fruit bats directed largely at disease minimization through good farm (McColl et al. 2000; Van der Poel et al. 2000), but most management practices, reducing the potential for exposure other reports have been concerned with various flaviviruses, including West Nile (Paul et al. 1970) and Kyasanur Forest Correspondence to: John S. Mackenzie, Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia (Pavri and Singh 1968), and with two unidentified para- (e-mail: [email protected]). myxoviruses (Pavri et al. 1971; Henderson et al. 1995). Of ª 2003 The Society for Applied Microbiology 60S J.S. MACKENZIE ET AL. the two paramyxoviruses, one was isolated from a Rousette the horses, and subsequently from kidney tissue from the fruit bat (Rousettus leschenaulti) in India (Pavri et al. 1971) fatal human case. The virus was named equine morbillivirus and was later identified as a new animal subtype of on the basis of a weak one-way cross-reaction with rinderpest parainfluenza virus (PIV) type 2, and the other, Mapuera virus, but was subsequently renamed Hendra virus (after the virus, a member of the genus Rubulavirus, was isolated from Brisbane suburb where the outbreak occurred). a Yellow-shouldered bat (Sturnira lilium) captured in the A second small outbreak in Mackay, about 1000 km north tropical rain forest of Brazil in 1979 (Henderson et al. 1995). of Brisbane, came to light about 12 months later, although it Experimentally, fruit bats have been shown to be susceptible actually pre-dated the Hendra outbreak by over a month. to infection with Japanese encephalitis (Banerjee et al. 1979, Two horses died of unknown cause and the farmer, who had 1984) and Ebola (Swanepoel et al. 1996) viruses, the former assisted at necropsy, had a mild meningitic illness, but inducing a sufficient viraemia for onward transmission by recovered. Thirteen months later, however, the farmer mosquitoes (Banerjee et al. 1984) and the latter also became ill and died of a severe encephalitis which was shown producing a viraemia with a high virus titre. However, to be caused by Hendra virus (O’Sullivan et al. 1997). considerable interest has recently been engendered by the Subsequent investigations demonstrated that the horses had emergence of novel viruses from fruit bats in Australia and died of Hendra virus infection (Hooper et al. 1996; Rogers Southeast Asia. This paper describes these viruses and the et al. 1996), and the farmer had been infected at that time, problems in their management. but the virus had presumably remained latent and reacti- vated 13 months later (O’Sullivan et al. 1997). A third incident of equine infection with Hendra virus occurred in 3. EMERGENCE OF THREE NEW VIRUSES January 1999 (Field et al. 2000; Hooper et al. 2000), but IN AUSTRALIA only affecting a single animal. Between 1994 and 1997, three novel zoonotic viruses were An extensive seroepidemiological investigation of wild discovered in Australia associated with fruit bats of the and domestic animals was initiated to find the source of the genus Pteropus (flying foxes); Hendra virus in 1994, ABLV virus (Rogers et al. 1996; Ward et al. 1996; Young et al. in 1996, and Menangle virus in 1997. Their emergence was 1996). The only seropositive animals to be found were unprecedented; no similar multi-emergence of three novel flying foxes (Young et al. 1996, 1997). Indeed antibodies to viruses belonging to two virus families and three genera, and Hendra virus were detected in all four species of flying all isolated from a single host genus, had been reported foxes found in Australia. These are the spectacled flying previously over such a short time frame. fox (Pteropus conspicillatus), which occurs in northern and eastern parts of Queensland; the black flying fox (P. alecto), which has a wide distribution across northern Australia, 3.1 Hendra virus the little red flying fox (P. scapulatus), which is found The first of the three viruses to appear was Hendra virus, across northern and eastern Australia, and the grey-headed previously called equine morbillivirus. A number of recent flying fox (P. poliocephalus), which occurs in eastern and reviews have described the isolation, ecology, epidemiology, south-eastern Australia (Field et al. 2001a,b). Approxi- molecular biology, virion structure and laboratory diagnosis mately 47% of flying foxes sampled over their full of Hendra virus (Daniels et al. 2001, Field et al. 2001a,b; geographical range have been found to have antibodies to Hyatt et al.
Recommended publications
  • Mosquitoes in DENGUE MOSQUITOES the World? ARE MOST ACTIVE DURING BO the DAY AROUND a U S T YOUR YARD T SALTMARSH MOSQUITOES C ARE MOST a ACTIVE at DUSK
    Mosquito awareness Did you know... Mosquito species there are 3500 vary in their species of biting behaviour mosquitoes in DENGUE MOSQUITOES the world? ARE MOST ACTIVE DURING BO THE DAY AROUND A U S T YOUR YARD T SALTMARSH MOSQUITOES C ARE MOST A ACTIVE AT DUSK AND DAWN F Council conducts 300 SPECIES IN AUSTRALIA mosquito control 40 SPECIES IN TOWNSVILLE World's COUNCIL CONDUCTS deadliest MOSQUITO CONTROL ON MOSQUITOES PUBLIC LAND, USING BOTH animals GROUND AND AERIAL TREATMENTS TO TARGET NUMBER OF PEOPLE MOSQUITO LARVAE. KILLED BY ANIMALS PER YEAR Mosquitoes wings beat 300-600 times per second Mosquitoes Mosquitoes can carry are attracted many diseases. to humans FROM THE ODOURS AND CARBON DIOXIDE WE EXPIRE FROM BREATHING Protect yourself OR SWEATING. townsville.qld.gov.au and your family Mosquitoes distance of travel 13 48 10 from mosquito bites from breeding point by using personal DENGUE MOSQUITO SALTMARSH MOSQUITO protection. 200M 50KM BREEDING PLACE Mosquito Mosquito Mosquito life cycle disease prevention A mosquito is an insect characterised by Protect yourself Did you know... Dengue. 1. Three body parts against disease-carrying Townsville City Do your weekly a. Head mosquitoes Council undertakes yard check. b. Thorax c. Abdomen reactive inspection ARE YOU MAKING DENGUE Mosquito borne How do of properties within MOSSIES WELCOME 2. A proboscis (for AROUND YOUR HOME? piercing and sucking) diseases found in mosquitoes the Townsville local TAKE RESPONSIBILITY TO 3. One pair of antennae Townsville include transmit government area PROTECT YOURSELF AND 4. One pair of wings YOUR FAMILY BY CHECKING Ross River virus diseases? based on customer YOUR YARD FOR ANYTHING 5.
    [Show full text]
  • California Encephalitis Orthobunyaviruses in Northern Europe
    California encephalitis orthobunyaviruses in northern Europe NIINA PUTKURI Department of Virology Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki Doctoral Program in Biomedicine Doctoral School in Health Sciences Academic Dissertation To be presented for public examination with the permission of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, in lecture hall 13 at the Main Building, Fabianinkatu 33, Helsinki, 23rd September 2016 at 12 noon. Helsinki 2016 Supervisors Professor Olli Vapalahti Department of Virology and Veterinary Biosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki and Department of Virology and Immunology, Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa, Helsinki, Finland Professor Antti Vaheri Department of Virology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Reviewers Docent Heli Harvala Simmonds Unit for Laboratory surveillance of vaccine preventable diseases, Public Health Agency of Sweden, Solna, Sweden and European Programme for Public Health Microbiology Training (EUPHEM), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Stockholm, Sweden Docent Pamela Österlund Viral Infections Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland Offical Opponent Professor Jonas Schmidt-Chanasit Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine WHO Collaborating Centre for Arbovirus and Haemorrhagic Fever Reference and Research National Reference Centre for Tropical Infectious Disease Hamburg, Germany ISBN 978-951-51-2399-2 (PRINT) ISBN 978-951-51-2400-5 (PDF, available
    [Show full text]
  • The Non-Human Reservoirs of Ross River Virus: a Systematic Review of the Evidence Eloise B
    Stephenson et al. Parasites & Vectors (2018) 11:188 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2733-8 REVIEW Open Access The non-human reservoirs of Ross River virus: a systematic review of the evidence Eloise B. Stephenson1*, Alison J. Peel1, Simon A. Reid2, Cassie C. Jansen3,4 and Hamish McCallum1 Abstract: Understanding the non-human reservoirs of zoonotic pathogens is critical for effective disease control, but identifying the relative contributions of the various reservoirs of multi-host pathogens is challenging. For Ross River virus (RRV), knowledge of the transmission dynamics, in particular the role of non-human species, is important. In Australia, RRV accounts for the highest number of human mosquito-borne virus infections. The long held dogma that marsupials are better reservoirs than placental mammals, which are better reservoirs than birds, deserves critical review. We present a review of 50 years of evidence on non-human reservoirs of RRV, which includes experimental infection studies, virus isolation studies and serosurveys. We find that whilst marsupials are competent reservoirs of RRV, there is potential for placental mammals and birds to contribute to transmission dynamics. However, the role of these animals as reservoirs of RRV remains unclear due to fragmented evidence and sampling bias. Future investigations of RRV reservoirs should focus on quantifying complex transmission dynamics across environments. Keywords: Amplifier, Experimental infection, Serology, Virus isolation, Host, Vector-borne disease, Arbovirus Background transmission dynamics among arboviruses has resulted in Vertebrate reservoir hosts multiple definitions for the key term “reservoir” [9]. Given Globally, most pathogens of medical and veterinary im- the diversity of virus-vector-vertebrate host interactions, portance can infect multiple host species [1].
    [Show full text]
  • A New Orbivirus Isolated from Mosquitoes in North-Western Australia Shows Antigenic and Genetic Similarity to Corriparta Virus B
    viruses Article A New Orbivirus Isolated from Mosquitoes in North-Western Australia Shows Antigenic and Genetic Similarity to Corriparta Virus but Does Not Replicate in Vertebrate Cells Jessica J. Harrison 1,†, David Warrilow 2,†, Breeanna J. McLean 1, Daniel Watterson 1, Caitlin A. O’Brien 1, Agathe M.G. Colmant 1, Cheryl A. Johansen 3, Ross T. Barnard 1, Sonja Hall-Mendelin 2, Steven S. Davis 4, Roy A. Hall 1 and Jody Hobson-Peters 1,* 1 Australian Infectious Diseases Research Centre, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia 4072, Australia; [email protected] (J.J.H.); [email protected] (B.J.M.); [email protected] (D.W.); [email protected] (C.A.O.B.); [email protected] (A.M.G.C.); [email protected] (R.T.B.); [email protected] (R.A.H.) 2 Public Health Virology Laboratory, Department of Health, Queensland Government, P.O. Box 594, Archerfield 4108, Australia; [email protected] (D.W.); [email protected] (S.H.-M.) 3 School of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands 6009, Australia; [email protected] 4 Berrimah Veterinary Laboratory, Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Darwin 0828, Australia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-7-3365-4648 † These authors contributed equally to the work. Academic Editor: Karyn Johnson Received: 19 February 2016; Accepted: 10 May 2016; Published: 20 May 2016 Abstract: The discovery and characterisation of new mosquito-borne viruses provides valuable information on the biodiversity of vector-borne viruses and important insights into their evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Sequencing of Historical Isolates, K-Mer Mining and High Serological Cross-Reactivity with Ross River Virus Argue Against the Presence of Getah Virus in Australia
    pathogens Article Sequencing of Historical Isolates, K-mer Mining and High Serological Cross-Reactivity with Ross River Virus Argue against the Presence of Getah Virus in Australia 1, 1, 1 2 3 Daniel J. Rawle y , Wilson Nguyen y , Troy Dumenil , Rhys Parry , David Warrilow , Bing Tang 1, Thuy T. Le 1, Andrii Slonchak 2, Alexander A. Khromykh 2,4, Viviana P. Lutzky 1, Kexin Yan 1 and Andreas Suhrbier 1,4,* 1 Inflammation Biology Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; [email protected] (D.J.R.); [email protected] (W.N.); [email protected] (T.D.); [email protected] (B.T.); [email protected] (T.T.L.); [email protected] (V.P.L.); [email protected] (K.Y.) 2 School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia; [email protected] (R.P.); [email protected] (A.S.); [email protected] (A.A.K.) 3 Public Health Virology Laboratory, Department of Health, Queensland Government, Brisbane, QLD 4108, Australia; [email protected] 4 GVN Center of Excellence, Australian Infectious Diseases Research Centre, Brisbane, QLD 4006 and 4072, Australia * Correspondence: [email protected] These authors equally contributed to this work. y Received: 14 September 2020; Accepted: 15 October 2020; Published: 16 October 2020 Abstract: Getah virus (GETV) is a mosquito-transmitted alphavirus primarily associated with disease in horses and pigs in Asia. GETV was also reported to have been isolated from mosquitoes in Australia in 1961; however, retrieval and sequencing of the original isolates (N544 and N554), illustrated that these viruses were virtually identical to the 1955 GETVMM2021 isolate from Malaysia.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinically Important Vector-Borne Diseases of Europe
    Natalie Cleton, DVM Erasmus MC, Rotterdam Department of Viroscience [email protected] No potential conflicts of interest to disclose © by author ESCMID Online Lecture Library Erasmus Medical Centre Department of Viroscience Laboratory Diagnosis of Arboviruses © by author Natalie Cleton ESCMID Online LectureMarion Library Koopmans Chantal Reusken [email protected] Distribution Arboviruses with public health impact have a global and ever changing distribution © by author ESCMID Online Lecture Library Notifications of vector-borne diseases in the last 6 months on Healthmap.org Syndromes of arboviral diseases 1) Febrile syndrome: – Fever & Malaise – Headache & retro-orbital pain – Myalgia 2) Neurological syndrome: – Meningitis, encephalitis & myelitis – Convulsions & coma – Paralysis 3) Hemorrhagic syndrome: – Low platelet count, liver enlargement – Petechiae © by author – Spontaneous or persistent bleeding – Shock 4) Arthralgia,ESCMID Arthritis and Online Rash: Lecture Library – Exanthema or maculopapular rash – Polyarthralgia & polyarthritis Human arboviruses: 4 main virus families Family Genus Species examples Flaviviridae flavivirus Dengue 1-5 (DENV) West Nile virus (WNV) Yellow fever virus (YFV) Zika virus (ZIKV) Tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) Togaviridae alphavirus Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) O’Nyong Nyong virus (ONNV) Mayaro virus (MAYV) Sindbis virus (SINV) Ross River virus (RRV) Barmah forest virus (BFV) Bunyaviridae nairo-, phlebo-©, orthobunyavirus by authorCrimean -Congo heamoragic fever (CCHFV) Sandfly fever virus
    [Show full text]
  • This Report Considers the Development of a National Pest Manag
    Exclusion and Control of Exotic Mosquitoes of Public Health Significance .............................................................................................................. Report to the Minister for Biosecurity Published by Public Health Group, Ministry of Health, Manatü Hauora Wellington, New Zealand June 1997 (Revised September 1997) ISBN 0-478-20853-7 (Booklet) ISBN 0-478 20854-5 (Internet) Summary of Key Issues Potentially the most significant mosquito-borne diseases to New Zealand are the arboviral diseases Ross River Fever (Epidemic Polyarthritis), Dengue Fever, Barmah Forest virus and Japanese Encephalitis. The establishment and maintenance of a nationally co-ordinated approach to exclude and control exotic mosquitoes of public health significance is crucial to protect the public health. There are number of species of mosquitoes that should be of concern to New Zealand. The species of greatest concern is Aedes albopictus, the Asian Tiger Mosquito, a competent vector for Ross River Virus and Dengue. The risk of an outbreak of an arboviral disease or malaria in New Zealand is real and is likely to increase with time. In terms of potential entry of exotic mosquitoes, North Island port cities, such as those in Auckland and Northland, are more important than cities without either major international airports or shipping. The likely consequences of a major outbreak of arboviral disease are so serious that all reasonable steps should be taken to prevent such an occurrence. Enhancements are required to existing border control,
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Groups: Viruses (C) 1988, American Biological Safety Association
    Rev.: 1.0 Risk Groups: Viruses (c) 1988, American Biological Safety Association BL RG RG RG RG RG LCDC-96 Belgium-97 ID Name Viral group Comments BMBL-93 CDC NIH rDNA-97 EU-96 Australia-95 HP AP (Canada) Annex VIII Flaviviridae/ Flavivirus (Grp 2 Absettarov, TBE 4 4 4 implied 3 3 4 + B Arbovirus) Acute haemorrhagic taxonomy 2, Enterovirus 3 conjunctivitis virus Picornaviridae 2 + different 70 (AHC) Adenovirus 4 Adenoviridae 2 2 (incl animal) 2 2 + (human,all types) 5 Aino X-Arboviruses 6 Akabane X-Arboviruses 7 Alastrim Poxviridae Restricted 4 4, Foot-and- 8 Aphthovirus Picornaviridae 2 mouth disease + viruses 9 Araguari X-Arboviruses (feces of children 10 Astroviridae Astroviridae 2 2 + + and lambs) Avian leukosis virus 11 Viral vector/Animal retrovirus 1 3 (wild strain) + (ALV) 3, (Rous 12 Avian sarcoma virus Viral vector/Animal retrovirus 1 sarcoma virus, + RSV wild strain) 13 Baculovirus Viral vector/Animal virus 1 + Togaviridae/ Alphavirus (Grp 14 Barmah Forest 2 A Arbovirus) 15 Batama X-Arboviruses 16 Batken X-Arboviruses Togaviridae/ Alphavirus (Grp 17 Bebaru virus 2 2 2 2 + A Arbovirus) 18 Bhanja X-Arboviruses 19 Bimbo X-Arboviruses Blood-borne hepatitis 20 viruses not yet Unclassified viruses 2 implied 2 implied 3 (**)D 3 + identified 21 Bluetongue X-Arboviruses 22 Bobaya X-Arboviruses 23 Bobia X-Arboviruses Bovine 24 immunodeficiency Viral vector/Animal retrovirus 3 (wild strain) + virus (BIV) 3, Bovine Bovine leukemia 25 Viral vector/Animal retrovirus 1 lymphosarcoma + virus (BLV) virus wild strain Bovine papilloma Papovavirus/
    [Show full text]
  • OSAC Health Security Snapshot: Ross River Virus Disease (RRVD)
    OSAC Health Security Snapshot: Ross River Virus Disease (RRVD) Product of the Research & Information Support Center (RISC) The following is based on open-source reporting. It is designed to give a brief snapshot of a particular outbreak. For additional information, please contact OSAC’s Global Health and Pandemic Analyst. June 6, 2017 What is Breaking Out? Ross River virus disease (RRVD) is spread through mosquito bites. About 55%–75% of people who are infected do not feel sick. For those who do feel sick, symptoms of RRVD include joint (most commonly wrists, knees, ankles, fingers, elbows, shoulders, and jaw) pain and swelling, muscle pain, fever, tiredness, and rash. Joint pain may impact different joints at different times. Most patients recover within a few weeks, but some people experience joint pain, joint stiffness, or tiredness for many months. About 10% of people have ongoing depression and fatigue. Ross River virus disease is not fatal. Where is it Breaking Out? Ross River virus infection is the most common mosquito-related infection in Australia. RRVD had been considered a greater risk in rural regions of Australia; however, there have been outbreaks in the suburbs of Brisbane, Sydney, and Perth. In 2015, Brisbane was the epicenter of the largest outbreak of RRV since 1996. An outbreak in 1979-1980 in South Pacific islands resulted in more than 500,000 cases in American Samoa, Fiji, the Cook Islands, and New Caledonia. Since then, a large-scale RRVD outbreak has not occurred in the region. However, transmission from regional travelers -- most notably from Fiji -- does continue.
    [Show full text]
  • A Systematic Review of the Natural Virome of Anopheles Mosquitoes
    Review A Systematic Review of the Natural Virome of Anopheles Mosquitoes Ferdinand Nanfack Minkeu 1,2,3 and Kenneth D. Vernick 1,2,* 1 Institut Pasteur, Unit of Genetics and Genomics of Insect Vectors, Department of Parasites and Insect Vectors, 28 rue du Docteur Roux, 75015 Paris, France; [email protected] 2 CNRS, Unit of Evolutionary Genomics, Modeling and Health (UMR2000), 28 rue du Docteur Roux, 75015 Paris, France 3 Graduate School of Life Sciences ED515, Sorbonne Universities, UPMC Paris VI, 75252 Paris, France * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +33-1-4061-3642 Received: 7 April 2018; Accepted: 21 April 2018; Published: 25 April 2018 Abstract: Anopheles mosquitoes are vectors of human malaria, but they also harbor viruses, collectively termed the virome. The Anopheles virome is relatively poorly studied, and the number and function of viruses are unknown. Only the o’nyong-nyong arbovirus (ONNV) is known to be consistently transmitted to vertebrates by Anopheles mosquitoes. A systematic literature review searched four databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Lissa. In addition, online and print resources were searched manually. The searches yielded 259 records. After screening for eligibility criteria, we found at least 51 viruses reported in Anopheles, including viruses with potential to cause febrile disease if transmitted to humans or other vertebrates. Studies to date have not provided evidence that Anopheles consistently transmit and maintain arboviruses other than ONNV. However, anthropophilic Anopheles vectors of malaria are constantly exposed to arboviruses in human bloodmeals. It is possible that in malaria-endemic zones, febrile symptoms may be commonly misdiagnosed.
    [Show full text]
  • Mosquito-Borne Viruses and Non-Human Vertebrates in Australia: a Review
    viruses Review Mosquito-Borne Viruses and Non-Human Vertebrates in Australia: A Review Oselyne T. W. Ong 1,2 , Eloise B. Skinner 3,4 , Brian J. Johnson 2 and Julie M. Old 5,* 1 Children’s Medical Research Institute, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia; [email protected] 2 Mosquito Control Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia; [email protected] 3 Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia; [email protected] 4 Biology Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 5 School of Science, Western Sydney University, Hawkesbury, Locked bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Mosquito-borne viruses are well recognized as a global public health burden amongst humans, but the effects on non-human vertebrates is rarely reported. Australia, houses a number of endemic mosquito-borne viruses, such as Ross River virus, Barmah Forest virus, and Murray Valley encephalitis virus. In this review, we synthesize the current state of mosquito-borne viruses impacting non-human vertebrates in Australia, including diseases that could be introduced due to local mosquito distribution. Given the unique island biogeography of Australia and the endemism of vertebrate species (including macropods and monotremes), Australia is highly susceptible to foreign mosquito species becoming established, and mosquito-borne viruses becoming endemic alongside novel reservoirs. For each virus, we summarize the known geographic distribution, mosquito vectors, vertebrate hosts, clinical signs and treatments, and highlight the importance of including non-human vertebrates in the assessment of future disease outbreaks. The mosquito-borne viruses discussed can impact wildlife, livestock, and companion animals, causing significant changes to Australian Citation: Ong, O.T.W.; Skinner, E.B.; ecology and economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Geography of Human Monkeypox Case Occurrences Across Africa
    Ecology and Geography of Human Monkeypox Case Occurrences Across Africa Christine Ellis DVM Kansas State University College of Veterinary Medicine Manhattan, KS . Monkeypox Ecological Niche Modeling My Project . Introduction to Monkeypox Monkeypox – Virus Orthopoxvirus, Poxviridae, Chordopoxvirinae cowpox, vaccinia, variola Central genome tightly conserved Key functions: transcription, virus assembly Genes at termini are more variable Associated with virus-host interactions www.ci.vbi.vt.edu/pathinfo/pathogens/Monkeypox_virus_Info.shtml Monkeypox – Virus 2 geographically distinct clades Congo Basin clade West African clade 99% identical Diversity is located in the terminal regions West African clade Less virulent Less transmissible www.rst.gsfc.nasa.gov/Sect6/Sect6 Monkeypox – Human Disease “Emerged” in 1970-1971 After successful eradication of smallpox West and Central Africa rural, tropical rainforest areas Number of Reported* Cases of Monkeypox 500 400 300 # cases 200 100 Number of cases 0 1970- 1980- 1987- 1993- 1996 1997 1979 1986 1992 1995 Year Monkeypox – Human Disease 2003: United States 72 cases: 37 confirmed Monkeypox – Human Disease Source of virus Source of human infection www.nps.gov photos.igougo.com www.pets-classifieds.co.uk www.everwonder.com/david/bullwinkle Monkeypox – Clinical Presentation 10-14 day incubation 1-3 day prodrome Fever, malaise, lymphadenopathy, URT illness 2-4 weeks: febrile rash illness: Begins on the trunk, spreads centrifugally Macular, papular, vesicular, pustular stages
    [Show full text]