DOCSLIB.ORG

Downloaded 09/26/21 02:59 AM UTC 138 WEATHER and FORECASTING VOLUME 15

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Downloaded 09/26/21 02:59 AM UTC 138 WEATHER and FORECASTING VOLUME 15 VOLUME 15 WEATHER AND FORECASTING APRIL 2000 Utilization of Automatic Weather Station Data for Forecasting High Wind Speeds at Pegasus Runway, Antarctica R. E. HOLMES AND C. R. STEARNS Space Science and Engineering Center, University of WisconsinÐMadison, Madison, Wisconsin G. A. WEIDNER AND L. M. KELLER Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of WisconsinÐMadison, Madison, Wisconsin (Manuscript received 14 December 1998, in ®nal form 20 September 1999) ABSTRACT Reduced visibility due to blowing snow can severely hinder aircraft operations in the Antarctic. Wind speeds in excess of approximately 7±13 m s21 can result in blowing snow. The ability to forecast high wind speed events can improve the safety and ef®ciency of aircraft activities. The placement of automatic weather stations to the south (upstream) of the Pegasus Runway, and other air®elds near McMurdo Station, Antarctica, can provide the forecaster the information needed to make short-term (3±6 h) forecasts of high wind speeds, de®ned in this study to be greater than 15 m s21. Automatic weather station (AWS) data were investigated for the period of 1 January 1991 through 31 December 1996, and 109 events were found that had high wind speeds at the Pegasus North AWS site. Data from other selected AWS sites were examined for precursors to these high wind speed events. A temperature increase was generally observed at most sites before such an event commenced. Increases in the temperature difference between the Pegasus North AWS and the Minna Bluff AWS and increasing pressure differences between other AWS sites were also common features present before the wind speed began to increase at the Pegasus North site. Many times, changes in one or more of these parameters occurred hours before the wind began to increase at the Pegasus North site. Monitoring of these parameters can lead to an improved 3±6-h forecast of these high wind speed events at Pegasus Runway, Antarctica. 1. Introduction whiteout, the vast snow ®eld of the Ross Ice Shelf, while the wheeled aircraft can only land on runways con- The National Science Foundation's Of®ce of Polar structed on ice. The reliance on an ice runway for Programs operates the United States Antarctic Pro- wheeled aircraft increases the importance of a good gram's (USAP) year-round stations in the Antarctic at Anvers Island (Palmer Station), Ross Island (McMurdo weather forecast for these ¯ights because after passing Station), and at the South Pole (Amundsen±Scott Sta- the point of safe return, the only landing sites that can tion). While Palmer Station is generally serviced via accommodate wheeled aircraft are the two ice runways USAP research vessels from South America, McMurdo near McMurdo Station. Station is partially supplied by aircraft from Christ- Figure 1 shows the three landing sites, Williams Field church, New Zealand, and Amundsen±Scott Station is ski-way, Pegasus blue-ice runway, and the sea-ice run- supplied entirely by aircraft ¯ights from McMurdo Sta- way, in the vicinity of McMurdo Station. The sea-ice tion. Most of the personnel at McMurdo and Amund- runway is located on the annual sea ice west of the sen±Scott Stations travel by air to and from New Zea- southernmost point of Hut Point Peninsula although its land. location annually varies. The sea-ice runway is used by The aircraft used for ¯ights between Christchurch and both ski-equipped and wheeled aircraft. Its season of McMurdo Station are the ski-equipped LC-130, and the use begins in August and continues until early Decem- wheeled C-130, C-141, and C-5. In the area of McMurdo ber, when the sea ice becomes unsafe for aircraft op- Station, the ski-equipped LC-130 can land on ice, com- erations. At this time, all aircraft operations shift to pacted snow, or, in extreme circumstances such as a Williams Field and all ¯ights, whether between Mc- Murdo Station and New Zealand, Amundsen±Scott Sta- tion, or remote ®eld camps, are made exclusively by the ski-equipped LC-130. Corresponding author address: Robert Holmes, Space Science and Engineering Center, 1225 West Dayton St., Madison, WI 53706. The Pegasus blue-ice runway is used for ¯ights by E-mail: [email protected] wheeled aircraft late in the austral summer ®eld season, q 2000 American Meteorological Society 137 Unauthenticated | Downloaded 09/26/21 02:59 AM UTC 138 WEATHER AND FORECASTING VOLUME 15 TABLE 1. Locations of AWS units used in support of this study. Elevation Site Lat Long (m) Pegasus North 77.958S 166.518E 10 Minna Bluff 78.568S 166.698E 920 Elaine 83.158S 174.468E 60 Willie Field 77.858S 167.088E 40 Ferrell 78.028S 170.808E 45 Lettau 82.528S 174.438W 55 Gill 80.038S 178.638W 55 Linda 78.508S 168.358E 50 Schwerdtfeger 79.948S 169.838E 60 Marilyn 79.988S 165.038E 75 AWS site than that at Ferrell AWS site. The wind di- rection associated with the maximum monthly wind speed at Pegasus was from the direction of Minna Bluff, which lies 55 km to the south of the Pegasus AWS site. Data for 1989 for Ferrell and Pegasus AWS sites are given by Stearns and Weidner (1990). Plans were made to install AWS units at the north and south ends of the Pegasus Runway, on top of Minna Bluff, at Williams Field, and on the Ross Ice Shelf east of Minna Bluff based on the information initially pro- vided by the Pegasus AWS unit. The purpose of the AWS site on top of Minna Bluff, at an elevation of 920 m, was to detect the strong winds ¯owing over Minna Bluff and continuing toward the Pegasus Runway. The AWS site east of Minna Bluff (Linda AWS site) was installed to investigate the air¯ow near the east end of Minna Bluff. The AWS units on each end of the Pegasus Runway were installed to observe any differences in the FIG. 1. Location map of the Pegasus runway site (adapted from wind speed, wind direction, atmospheric pressure, and Blaisdell et al. 1995). air temperature along the runway. The AWS unit on the west end of the Williams Field ski-way was installed to provide a nearby AWS test site and to obtain meteo- approximately late January into March. During most of rological data for the entire year. Previously, meteoro- the austral summer, the runway is covered with snow logical data were collected only when Williams Field to maintain the integrity of the ice surface, and then the was in operation. snow is removed prior to the commencement of air op- The Pegasus North AWS site was installed in January erations. The use of the Pegasus runway also allows the 1990 at the north end of the now established Pegasus ski-equipped LC-130 to operate on wheels and not on runway. The AWS sites at Minna Bluff, Linda, and Peg- skis, which allows for as much as a 50% increase in asus South were established in January 1991. The Peg- the payload. asus South AWS unit also measures a vertical temper- The ®rst automatic weather station (AWS) unit near ature pro®le in the ice. Stearns and Weidner (1991, all three runway facilities was installed near the wrecked 1992) reported that while the wind directions at both aircraft named Pegasus in January 1989. It provided the Pegasus North and South AWS sites were most com- atmospheric pressure, air temperature, and wind speed monly from the east-northeast, winds with speeds great- and direction data until the unit was removed in No- er than 8 m s21 had a strong tendency to blow from the vember 1989. The data record over this time period south. showed that the Pegasus AWS site monthly mean air Several AWS units have also been deployed near Mc- temperature was approximately 18C warmer than the Murdo and to the south (upstream) of the Ross Island monthly mean temperature at Ferrell AWS site, ap- area to aid in operational forecasting. Fleming (1983) proximately 88 km to the east and at approximately the utilized data from many of these units to forecast fog same latitude (Table 1). The monthly average wind at the Williams Field runway. He found that during the speed was 1±2 m s21 less at Pegasus AWS site than that period from 1 November 1982 to 13 January 1983 there at Ferrell AWS site, but the maximum monthly wind was a strong correlation between a wind from the south- speed had a tendency to be 8±10 m s21 greater at Pegasus east quadrant (908±1708) at Ferrell AWS site and dense Unauthenticated | Downloaded 09/26/21 02:59 AM UTC APRIL 2000 HOLMES ET AL. 139 The data for this study were obtained from the AWS sites, whose geographic location and elevation are found in Table 1; Fig. 4 shows the locations for these AWS sites. Data from 1991 through 1996 were chosen for this study. Unfortunately, not all of the units were op- erating at all times. Missing data can be the result of any number of events that occur while the AWS unit is unattended. 3. Statement of the problem Because of its remote location, air travel in the Ant- arctic can be dangerous. A downed aircraft could lead to loss of life not only from the crash itself, but from exposure or because of the lack of nearby medical fa- cilities. Therefore, safety is a high priority for those involved in air transportation. FIG. 2. Layout of the AWS unit used in the Antarctic. The installed Most of the personnel working for USAP are trans- AWS unit has a 3-m tower with a horizontal boom supporting the antenna, aerovane, air temperature thermometer, upper themopile, and ported to the continent by air, using one of three runway the relative humidity sensor.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Development Pressures on the Antarctic Wilderness
    XXVIII ATCM – IP May 2004 Original: English Agenda Items 3 (Operation of the CEP) and 4a (General Matters) DEVELOPMENT PRESSURES ON THE ANTARCTIC WILDERNESS Submitted to the XXVIII ATCM by the Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition DEVELOPMENT PRESSURES ON THE ANTARCTIC WILDERNESS 1. Introduction In 2004 the Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition (ASOC) tabled information paper ATCM XXVII IP 094 “Are new stations justified?”. The paper highlighted proposals for the construction of no less than five new Antarctic stations in the context of at least 73 established stations (whether full year or summer only), maintained by 26 States already operating in the Antarctic Treaty Area. The paper considered what was driving the new station activity in Antarctica, whether or not it was necessary or desirable, and what alternatives there might be to building yet more stations. Whilst IP 094 focused on new station proposals, it noted that there were other significant infrastructure projects underway in Antarctica, which included substantial upgrades of existing national stations, the development of air links to various locations in Antarctica and related runways, and an ice road to the South Pole. Since then, ASOC has become aware of additional proposals for infrastructure projects. This paper updates ASOC’s ATCM XXVII IP 094 to include most infrastructure projects planned or currently underway in Antarctica as of April 2005, and discusses their contribution to cumulative impacts. The criteria used to select these projects are: 1. The project’s environmental impact is potentially “more than minor or transitory”; 2. The project results in a development of infrastructure that is significant in the Antarctic context; 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Environmental Evaluation
    Initial Environmental Evaluation Construction and operation of Troll Runway Norwegian Polar Institute November 2002 Table of Contents 1 Summary ........................................................................................3 2 Introduction....................................................................................4 2.1 BACKGROUND............................................................................................................. 4 2.2 PURPOSE AND NEED ..................................................................................................... 5 3 Description of activity (including alternatives)...............................7 3.1 LOCATION AND LAYOUT OF RUNWAY.......................................................................... 7 3.2 PREPARATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE RUNWAY................................................. 11 3.3 OPERATION OF THE RUNWAY.................................................................................... 12 3.4 RUNWAY FACILITIES ................................................................................................. 14 3.5 ASSOCIATED ACTIVITIES........................................................................................... 14 3.6 TIMEFRAME............................................................................................................... 16 4 Description of the environment ....................................................17 4.1 THE ENVIRONMENT AT THE SITE...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GPS Observations for Ice Sheet History (GOFISH)
    GPS Observations for Ice Sheet History (GOFISH) WASA/ABOA and SVEA stations, East Antarctica December 2001-January 2002 Dan Zwartz, Michiel Helsen Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research Utrecht University, The Netherlands Contents List of acronyms 2 Map of Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica 3 Introduction 4 GPS Observations for Ice Sheet History (GOFISH) Travel itinerary 5 Expedition timetable 8 GPS geodesy Snow sample programme 12 Glacial geology 18 Weather Stations Maintenance 19 Acknowledgements 20 References 21 Front cover. View on Scharffenbergbotnen in the Heimefrontfjella, near the Swedish field station Svea, East Antarctica (photo by M. Helsen). 1 List of acronyms ABL Atmospheric Boundary Layer AWS Automatic Weather Station CIO Centre for Isotope Research (Groningen University) DML Dronning Maud Land ENABLE EPICA-Netherlands Atmospheric Boundary Layer Experiment EPICA European Project for Ice Coring in Antarctica GISP Greenland Ice Sheet Project GPS Global Positioning System GRIP Greenland Ice Coring Project GTS Global Telecommunication System GOFISH GPS Observations for Ice Sheet History HM Height Meter (stand-alone sonic height ranger) IMAU Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research (Utrecht University) m asl Meters above mean sea level KNMI Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute NWO Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research SL (Atmospheric) Surface Layer (lowest 10% of the ABL) VU Free University of Amsterdam w.e. water equivalents 2 Map of Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica 10°5°0°5°10° 69° FIMFIMBUL
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation (CEE) for the Upgrading of the Norwegian Summer Station Troll in Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica, to Permanent Station
    FINAL Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation (CEE) for the upgrading of the Norwegian summer station Troll in Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica, to permanent station. The Norwegian Polar Institute is Norway’s main institution for research, monitoring and topographic mapping in Norwegian polar regions. The institute also advises Norwegian authorities on matters concerning polar environmental management. Norwegian Polar Institute 2004 Preface The Norwegian Polar Institute (NPI) prepared a draft Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation (Draft CEE) for the upgrading of the Norwegian summer station Troll in Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica, to permanent station. The Draft CEE was submitted to the Ministry of Environment (MoE) in January 2004. The Draft CEE was then made publicly available according to the provisions of the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty (Environmental Protocol) as confirmed in the national regulations pertaining to the protection of the environment in Antarctica (Antarctic Regulations). The Draft CEE was made available on the NPI website (www.npolar.no) from February 2004. The Parties to the Antarctic Treaty were notified about the Draft CEE and made aware of its website location through diplomatic notice (dated 23.01.04), satisfying the provisions of Article 3 (3) of Annex I of the Environmental Protocol. The NPI received comments on the Draft CEE from Australia and Germany. The comments are attached as Appendix 9 to this final version of the CEE (Final CEE). The suggestions and concerns raised in these comments are addressed in the present document. All modifications are in italics with corresponding footnotes on the originators of the particular comment. The Draft CEE was furthermore submitted to the CEP Chair for CEP’s consideration in accordance with Article 3 (4) of Annex I of the Environmental Protocol.
    [Show full text]
  • II. Expedition Dates
    Information Exchange Under United States Antarctic Activities Articles III and VII(5) of the Activities Planned for 2003- 2004 ANTARCTIC TREATY II. Expedition Dates II. Expedition Dates Section II of the 2003-2004 season plan includes information concerning vessel and aircraft operations along with estimated dates of expeditions and other significant events. Winfly Activities Annual augmentation of the U.S. Antarctic Program (USAP) begins with austral winter flights (WINFLY), departing Christchurch, New Zealand, and arriving McMurdo Station, Antarctica, about 20 August 2003. The aircraft will carry scientists and support personnel to start early pre-summer projects, to augment maintenance personnel, and to prepare skiways and ice runways at McMurdo Station. This will involve 3 U.S. Air Force C-17 flights and will increase station population from the winter-over level of about 154 to a transition level of about 580 (285 personnel expected to deploy at WINFLY). Mainbody Activities Austral summer activities will be initiated on 30 September 2003 with wheeled aircraft operations between Christchurch, New Zealand and the sea-ice runways at McMurdo Station, Antarctica. This will involve approximately 21 C-141 flights, 11 C-17 flights and 4 C-5 flights of transport aircraft of the U.S. Air Force Air Mobility Command (AMC), and 15 flights by C-130 transport aircraft of the Royal New Zealand Air Force. The sea- ice runway operations will cease about mid December 2003. Williams Field will open for the ski-equipped LC-130 aircrafts and at the same time approximately 2 days pass the Ice Runway closure, Pegasus Blue Ice Runway will be open for wheeled aircraft from Christchurch to McMurdo.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Construction and Operation of a Gravel Runway in the Area of Mario Zucchelli Station, Terra Nova Bay, Victoria Land, Antarctica
    ATCM XXXIX, CEP XIX, Santiago 2016 Annex A to the WP presented by Italy Draft Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation Proposed construction and operation of a gravel runway in the area of Mario Zucchelli Station, Terra Nova Bay, Victoria Land, Antarctica January 2016 Rev. 0 (INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) TABLE OF CONTENTS Non-technical summary ...................................................................................................................... i I Introduction ........................................................................................................................ i II Need of Proposed Activities .............................................................................................. ii III Site selection and alternatives .......................................................................................... iii IV Description of the Proposed Activity ............................................................................... iv V Initial Environmental Reference State .............................................................................. v VI Identification and Prediction of Environmental Impact, Mitigation Measures of the Proposed Activities .......................................................................................................... vi VII Environmental Impact Monitoring Plan ........................................................................... ix VIII Gaps in Knowledge and Uncertainties ............................................................................. ix
    [Show full text]
  • CRREL Report 93-14
    CRREL REPORT 93-14 Malcolm Mellor Aviation Notes onAntarctic August1993 Abstract Antarctic aviation has been evolving for the best part of a century, with regular air operations developing over the past three or four decades. Antarctica is the last continent where aviation still depends almost entirely on expeditionary airfields and “bush flying,” but change seems imminent. This report describes the history of aviation in Antarctica, the types and characteristics of existing and proposed airfield facilities, and the characteristics of aircraft suitable for Antarctic use. It now seems possible for Antarctic aviation to become an extension of mainstream international aviation. The basic requirement is a well-distributed network of hard-surface airfields that can be used safely by conventional aircraft, together with good international collaboration. The technical capabilities al- ready exist. Cover: Douglas R4D Que Sera Sera, which made the first South Pole landing on 31 October 1956. (Smithsonian Institution photo no. 40071.) The contents of this report are not to be used for advertising or commercial purposes. Citation of brand names does not constitute an official endorsement or approval of the use of such commercial products. For conversion of SI metric units to U.S./British customary units of measurement consult ASTM Standard E380-89a, Standard Practice for Use of the International System of Units, published by the American Society for Testing and Materials, 1916 Race St., Philadelphia, Pa. 19103. CRREL Report 93-14 US Army Corps of Engineers Cold Regions Research & Engineering Laboratory Notes on Antarctic Aviation Malcolm Mellor August 1993 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. PREFACE This report was prepared by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of Russia–Us Joint Antarctic Inspection
    REPORT OF RUSSIA–US JOINT ANTARCTIC INSPECTION UNDER ARTICLE VII OF THE ANTARCTIC TREATY AND ARTICLE 14 OF THE PROTOCOL ON ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TO THE ANTARCTIC TREATY India – Maitri China – Zhongshan India – Bharati Japan – Syowa Belgium – Princess Elisabeth Norway – Troll NOVEMBER 29 – DECEMBER 6, 2012 Table Part I – Introduction ............................................................... 2 of Contents Part II – Inspection Overview .............................................. 5 Part III – General Conclusions ............................................. 7 Part IV – Antarctic Station Inspection Reports India – Maitri ........................................................................... 8 China – Zhongshan .............................................................. 14 India – Bharati ....................................................................... 21 Japan – Syowa ........................................................................ 27 Belgium – Princess Elisabeth .............................................. 33 Norway – Troll ...................................................................... 40 List of Acronyms ................................................................... 45 Part I – INTRODUCTION The U.S.-Russia Joint Antarctic Inspection Susannah Cooper was conducted from November 29 – Senior Advisor for Antarctica December 6, 2012. This is the second Office of Ocean and Polar Affairs phase of our joint inspection, which began United States Department of State in January 2012 based out of the
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation for Continuation and Modernization of Mcmurdo Station Area Activities
    DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION FOR CONTINUATION AND MODERNIZATION OF MCMURDO STATION AREA ACTIVITIES February 2019 Comments on the Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation should be addressed to: Dr. Polly A. Penhale, Senior Advisor, Environment National Science Foundation, Office of Polar Programs 2415 Eisenhower Avenue Alexandria, Virginia 22314 E-mail: [email protected] National Science Foundation 2415 Eisenhower Avenue Alexandria, Virginia 22314 This page intentionally left blank. DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION FOR CONTINUATION AND MODERNIZATION OF MCMURDO STATION AREA ACTIVITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS Non-Technical Summary ..................................................................................................................... NS-1 1. Introduction, Purpose and Need ................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 National Science Foundation and United States Antarctic Program Background ........... 1-1 1.1.1 History of Program and Development at McMurdo ........................................... 1-1 1.1.2 Scientific Goals of the USAP at McMurdo and Field Locations Supported by the Station ..................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Purpose and Need for the Proposed Activity ................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Scope of the Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation ................................................ 1-3 1.3.1 Scoping Process .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Airfields on Antarctic Glacierice
    AD-A217 638 ©2E[2 EL DI FILCOPYM US Army Corps 89-w21 of Engineers REPORT Cold Regions Research & Engineering Laboratory Airfields on Antarctic glacierice Vu., vA2 2~ FEB 0C DLSPM ONSAEM-T r it Cover: Blue ice areas near the Scott Glacier. There is a possible landing field at 86035"S, 148025"W (5600 ft-or 1700 m-a.s.L ), but approaches are obstructed by mountains on thrae sides. CRREL Report 89-21 December 1989 Airfields on Antarctic glacier ice Malcolm Mellor and Charles Swithinbank Prepared for DIVISION OF POLAR PROGRAMS NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION 2 0 Approved for public release: distribution is unlimited. 9 0 u UNCLASSIFIED S ccuRvfc CAIION OF Tits PAGE REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE O O.o-'W.o U _ __ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ __ _ ___ __ _ _ _ _Emo Oote:.A 3u0. Q66 loo REPORT.S nCU ,.WC ,WAN IS.RESTICITV Aft.G,,.S Unclassified 20. SECURi 1Y CLA$CAWIN AWHORAY 3, M~IM OUIIONIAVAJ1AMUIY0F REPOill 1,rApproved for public release; 2. oowN-o SCHE distribution Wunlimited. 4, PROnMN4 GaWWJAI*. REPORT NUMER 5, MOM= O O%;,%A N EEPORI T'VS18EINS) CRREL Report $9-21 60, NAMIE OF PEAF0CRM4.G 0WANZATA' 6b. OfF)EVL 7o. NAME OF MONM1OR'.NG OW~AINVUA U.S. Army Cold Regions Research (ioprcob.) National Science Foundation and Engineering Laboratory CECRL Division of Polar Programs on4PSS(5V.?WFWCo**) 70. AOESS CC-) $1-04. andZP COO#.) 72 Lyme Road 1800 G St., NW Hanover, N.H.03755-1290 Washington, D.C.20550 Go.
    [Show full text]
  • WOLFS FANG RUNWAY Initial Environmental Evaluation Report Final July 2016
    WOLFS FANG RUNWAY Initial Environmental Evaluation Report Final July 2016 For Submission to the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office Wolfs Fang Runway IEE Final Report July 2016 WOLFS FANG RUNWAY Initial Environmental Evaluation Report Final July 2016 Author White Desert Ltd Date of Issue 18 July 2016 Issue/Status Issue 2/Final Document Number WFR_IEE_Final Distribution FCO BAS White Desert Ltd 242 Acklam Rd London W10 5JJ Wolfs Fang Runway IEE Final Report July 2016 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 7 2 LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT AND SCREENING 8 3 BACKGROUND 8 4 PURPOSE AND NEED 10 4.1 Whichaway Camp 12 4.2 Client Activities 12 4.3 Logistic Support 12 5 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT APPROACH 13 5.1 Consultation and Stakeholder Engagement 13 5.2 Relevant Guidance and Legislation 14 5.3 Approach and Methodology 15 5.4 Study Area 17 5.5 Establishment of Baseline Conditions 17 6 PROPOSED ACTIVITY 18 6.1 Operation of Wolfs Fang Runway 20 6.1.1 Fuel Handling 26 6.2 Ongoing Conduct of Intercontinental Flights 26 6.2.1 Flight Frequency 26 6.2.2 Runway activity 27 6.2.3 Flight activity 27 6.3 Ongoing changes to Client Numbers and intra continental Transfer Flights 28 6.4 Once Off Establishment Activities and Decommissioning /Remediation Activities 29 6.4.1 Season 1 30 6.4.2 Season 2 31 6.4.3 Decommissioning and Remediation 31 7 ALTERNATIVES 33 8 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENT AND BASELINE CONDITIONS 34 8.1 Introduction 34 8.2 Physical Environment 38 8.2.1 Wider Study Area 38 8.2.2 The Wolfs Fang Runway Site 38 8.3 Land Use 41 8.4 Flora and Fauna 41 White
    [Show full text]
  • AD-A273 018 Notes on Antarctic Aviation
    AD-A273 018 Notes on Antarctic Aviation Malcolm Mellor August 1993 ................... ......... ................ ......... ..... ...... .. .... .. .. .. ...... .......... .. :.:....... .. .. .. a .**.*.*..*~.*/o.il B ~ *NN Abstract Antarctic aviation has been evolving for the best part of a century, with regular air operations developing over the past three or four decades. Antarctica is the last continent where aviation still depends almost entirely on expeditionary airfields and *bush flying,' but change seems imminent. This report describes the history of aviation in Antarctica, the types and characteristics of existing and proposed airfield facilities, and the characteristics of aircraft suitable forAntarctic use. It now seems possible for Antarctic aviation to become an extension of mainstream international aviation. The basic requirement is a well-distributed network of hard-surface airfields thatcon be used safely by conventional aircraft, togetherwith good international collaboration. Thetechnical capabilities already exist. Cover: Douglas R4D Que Sera Sera, which made the first South Pole land•,,g on 31 October 1956. (Smithsonian Institution photo no. 4007 1.) The contents of this report are not to be used for advertising or commercial purposes. Citation of brand names does not constitute an official endorsement or approval of the use of such commercial products. For conversion of SI metric units to U.S./British customary units of measurement consult ASTM Standard E380-89a, StandardPractice for Use of the International System of Units, published by the American Society for Testing and Materials, 1916 Race St., Philadelphia, Pa. 19103. CRREL Report 93-14 US Army Corps of Engineers Cold Regions Research & Engineering Laboratory Notes on Antarctic Aviation Malcolm Mellor August 1993 Accesion For NTIS CRA&I DTIC TAB Unannounced E] Justification By Dist, ibution I Availability Codes Avail a:dIor Dist Special Approved for public release; distribution Is unlimited.
    [Show full text]