The Peggy Guggenheim Collection, Venice
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The American Abstract Artists and Their Appropriation of Prehistoric Rock Pictures in 1937
“First Surrealists Were Cavemen”: The American Abstract Artists and Their Appropriation of Prehistoric Rock Pictures in 1937 Elke Seibert How electrifying it must be to discover a world of new, hitherto unseen pictures! Schol- ars and artists have described their awe at encountering the extraordinary paintings of Altamira and Lascaux in rich prose, instilling in us the desire to hunt for other such discoveries.1 But how does art affect art and how does one work of art influence another? In the following, I will argue for a causal relationship between the 1937 exhibition Prehis- toric Rock Pictures in Europe and Africa shown at the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) and the new artistic directions evident in the work of certain New York artists immediately thereafter.2 The title for one review of this exhibition, “First Surrealists Were Cavemen,” expressed the unsettling, alien, mysterious, and provocative quality of these prehistoric paintings waiting to be discovered by American audiences (fig. ).1 3 The title moreover illustrates the extent to which American art criticism continued to misunderstand sur- realist artists and used the term surrealism in a pejorative manner. This essay traces how the group known as the American Abstract Artists (AAA) appropriated prehistoric paintings in the late 1930s. The term employed in the discourse on archaic artists and artistic concepts prior to 1937 was primitivism, a term due not least to John Graham’s System and Dialectics of Art as well as his influential essay “Primitive Art and Picasso,” both published in 1937.4 Within this discourse the art of the Ice Age was conspicuous not only on account of the previously unimagined timespan it traversed but also because of the magical discovery of incipient human creativity. -
Download Our Guide To
BEST OF CORNWALL 2020 Marianne Stokes, née Priendlsberger 1855 - 1927 Lantern Light, 1888 Oil on canvas, 82.5 x 102 cm Penlee House Gallery & Museum Purchased by private treaty from Mr & Mrs Allan Amey with assistance from The Art Fund, The MLA/V&A Purchase Grant Fund and the Friends of Penlee A brief and incomplete history of ... art and artists in Cornwall By Andrea Breton Cornwall has always appealed to the creative type; a land of mists and megaliths, it combines a wide variety of landscape, from perfectly sanded coves to dramatic cliffs and breakers; bleak, haunted moors to lush vegetal valleys. There are picturesque harbours and grand country houses set in vast acreages. There are impressive landmarks from the past such as Tintagel Castle, St Michael’s Mount and more standing stones and Neolithic sites than you can shake a stick at. They exist happily alongside the present day futuristic domes of Eden, the stately grey bulk of Tate St Ives, old Mine chimneys (sensibly bestowed with World Heritage status) and the spoil heaps of the clay pits near St Austell. 35 BEST OF CORNWALL 2020 However there is more to Cornwall’s appeal than It was clear that luck landmarks. It is the geographical distance to the rest of was needed. Fortunately, the England; the quirk of geology which makes Cornwall Victorian age was coming somewhat longer than it is wide. Surrounded by the sea, and with it the age of steam it gives the county an all enveloping bright light, allegedly powered travel and the artists’ a couple of lux higher than the mainland. -
Instructions for Genre Matching Cards This PDF Is Contains Large and Small Pictures Representing Each Genre. Each Page Contains
Montessori Alliance (c) Clair Battle Instructions for Genre Matching Cards This PDF is contains large and small pictures representing each genre. Each page contains a name card one large and 4 small pictures. Print, cut and laminate each picture from each genre and each name card This material can be used in several ways & here is a suggested exercise 1. Explain that art is grouped together in “families” known as genres. Each genre has things unique to it that all art in that family share. We are going to look at the five genres here and sort each picture into the correct genre. 2. Take the first genre name tag and explain what is unique about it. Then show the child an example of it from the four smaller art pieces. Help them identify and lay the others out below it. Continue with each genre, explaining it and then sorting until all have been placed. 3. Allow the student to peruse the art and each genre until they are ready to start the exercise again or put it away. All downloads are for your personal use and can be used within your setting but cannot be sold or uploaded to your own website or social media page. Montessori Alliance (c) Clair Battle Great Arsts in Naonal Gallery of Ireland Genre Game Poin(llism (c) Clair Battle Abstract Art (c) Clair Battle Cubism (c) Clair Battle Chromac (c) Clair Battle Baroque (c) Clair Battle Poinllist Art (Clockwise from top le) Chromac Art (Clockwise from top le) Signac “Breakfast” Monet “Water Lilies Blue” Signac “Women at the Well” Picasso “The Old Guitarist” Seraut “A Sunday Aernoon on the Island of La Grande Jae” Van Gogh “Vase with Fieen Sunflowers” Seguin “Portrait de M. -
Scanned Using Book Scancenter 5022
The RUTGERS ART REVIEW Published Annually by the Students of the Graduate Program in Art History at Rutgers university Spring 1984 Volume V II Corporate Matching Funds Martin Eidclberg Carrier Corporation Foundation. Inc. Mrs. Helmut von Erffa Citicorp Dino Philip Galiano Seth A. Gopin Lifetime Benefactor Daria K. Gorman Henfield Foundation Mary C. Gray Nathaniel Gurien Benefactors Marion Husid In memory of Mary Bartlett Linda R. Idetberger Cowdrey Nancy M. KatzolT John and Katherine Kenfield Patrons Mr. and Mrs. Sanford Kirschenbaum In memory of Frank S. Allmuth, Julia M. Lappegaard Class of 1920 Cynthia and David Lawrence Mr. and Mrs. John L. Ayer Patricia I..eightcn Olga and Oev Berendsen Deborah Leuchovius Robert P. and Marcelle Bergman Marion and Allan Maiilin Dianne M. Green Ricky A. Malkin Frima and Larry Hofrichter Tod A. Marder Robert S. Peckar Joan Marter Paul S. Sheikewiiz, M.D. Thomas Mohle Jeffrey Wechsler Roberto A. Moya Scott E. Pringle Supporters Eliot Rowlands Carol and Jerry Alterman Anita Sagarese Randi Joan Alterman John M. Schwebke Richard Derr John Beldon Scott Archer St. Clair Harvey Mr. and Mrs. Eugene Seitz William E. Havemeyer Marie A. Somma Dr. Robert Kaita and Ms. Chiu-Tze Jack and Helga Spector Lin James H. Stubblebine Mr. and Mrs. Edward J. Linky Richard and Miriam Wallman Mr. and Mrs. James McLachlan Harvey and Judith Waterman Barbara and Howard Mitnick Michael F. Weber Elizabeth M. Thompson Sarah B. Wilk Lorraine Zito*Durand Friends Department of Art History, University of Ann Conover, Inc. Delaware Keith Asszony The Pennsylvania State University, Renee and Matthew Baigell Department of Art History William and Elizabeth Bauer The Graduate School-New Brunswick, Naomi Boretz Rutgers University Phillip Dennis Cate Jane Voorhees Zimmerli Art Museum Zeau C. -
Aspects of Modern British Art
Austin/Desmond Fine Art GILLIAN AYRES JOHN BANTING WILHELMINA BARNS-GRAHAM DAVID BLACKBURN SANDRA BLOW Aspects of DAVID BOMBERG REG BUTLER Modern ANTHONY CARO PATRICK CAULFIELD British Art PRUNELLA CLOUGH ALAN DAVIE FRANCIS DAVISON TERRY FROST NAUM GABO SAM HAILE RICHARD HAMILTON BARBARA HEPWORTH PATRICK HERON ANTHONY HILL ROGER HILTON IVON HITCHENS DAVID HOCKNEY ANISH KAPOOR PETER LANYON RICHARD LIN MARY MARTIN MARGARET MELLIS ALLAN MILNER HENRY MOORE MARLOW MOSS BEN NICHOLSON WINIFRED NICHOLSON JOHN PIPER MARY POTTER ALAN REYNOLDS BRIDGET RILEY WILLIAM SCOTT JACK SMITH HUMPHREY SPENDER BRYAN WYNTER DAVID BOMBERG (1890-1957) 1 Monastery of Mar Saba, Wadi Kelt, near Jericho, 1926 Coloured chalks Signed and dated lower right, Inscribed verso Monastery of Mar Saba, Wadi Kelt, near Jericho, 1926 by David Bomberg – Authenticated by Lillian Bomberg. 54.6 x 38.1cm Prov: The Artist’s estate Bernard Jacobson Gallery, London ‘David Bomberg once remarked when asked for a definition of painting that it is ‘A tone of day or night and the monument to a memorable hour. It is structure in textures of colour.’ His ‘monuments’, whether oil paintings, pen and wash drawings, or oil sketches on paper, have varied essentially between two kinds of structure. There is the structure built up of clearly defined, tightly bounded forms of the early geometrical-constructivist work; and there is, in contrast, the flowing, richly textured forms of his later period, so characteristic of Bomberg’s landscape painting. These distinctions seem to exist even in the palette: primary colours and heavily saturated hues in the early works, while the later paintings are more subtle, tonally conceived surfaces. -
John Ferren (American Painter, 1905-1970)
237 East Palace Avenue Santa Fe, NM 87501 800 879-8898 505 989-9888 505 989-9889 Fax [email protected] John Ferren (American Painter, 1905-1970) John Ferren was one of the few members of the American abstract artists to come to artistic maturity in Paris. A native of California, in 1924 Ferren went to work for a company that produced plaster sculpture. He briefly attended art school in San Francisco. Later he served as an apprentice to a stonecutter. By 1929, Ferren had saved enough money to go to Europe, stopping first in New York where he saw the Gallatin Collection. He went to France and to Italy. In Saint-Tropez, he met Hans Hofmann, Vaclav Vytlacil, and other Hofmann students. When Ferren stopped to visit them in Munich, he saw a Matisse exhibition, an experience that was instrumental in shifting his work from sculpture to painting. In Europe, Ferren did not pursue formal art studies, although he sat in on classes at the Sorbonne and attended informal drawing sessions at the Academie Ranson and the Academie de la Grande Chaumiere. Instead, Ferren said, he "literally learned art around the cafe tables in Paris, knowing other artists and talking." After this initial year in Europe, Ferren returned to California. By 1931 he was again in Paris, where he lived for most of the next seven years. Surrounded by the Parisian avant-garde, Ferren wrestled with his own idiom. His diaries from these years indicate far-ranging explorations from a Hofmann-like concern for surface to the spiritual searches of Kandinsky and Mondrian. -
FDRS Price MF-$0.65 HC$23.03 Appendicestwo Cn Western Art, Two on Architect Ire, and One Each on Nonwestern Art, Nonwestern Musi
DOCDPENT RESUME ED 048 316 24 TE 499 838 AUTHOR Colwell, Pichard TTTLE An Approach to Aesthetic Education, Vol. 2. Final Report. INSTITUTION Illinois Univ., Urbana, Coll. of Education. SPCNS AGENCY Office of Education (DREW), Washington, D.0 Bureau of Research. 'aUREAU NO BR-6-1279 PUB DATE Sep 70 CONTRACT OEC-3-6-061279-1609 NOTE 680p. EERS PRICE FDRS Price MF-$0.65 HC$23.03 DESCRIPTORS *Architecture, *Art Education, *Cultural Enrichment, *Dance, Film Study, Inst,.uctional Materials, Lesson Plans, Literature, Music Education, Non Western Civilization, *Teaching Techniques, Theater Arts, Western Civilization ABSTRACT Volume 2(See also TE 499 637.) of this aesthetic education project contains the remiinirig 11 of 17 report appendicestwo cn Western art, two on architect ire, and one each on Nonwestern art, Nonwestern music, dance, theatre, ana a blif outline on film and literature--offering curriculum materials and sample lesson plans.The. last two appendices provide miscellaneous informatics (e.g., musi,:al topics not likely to be discussed with this exemplar approach) and a "uorking bibliography." (MF) FINACVPORT Contract Number OEC3,6-061279-1609 AN APPROACH TO AESTHETIC EDUCATION VOLUME II September 1970 el 111Q1 7). ,f; r ri U.S. DepartmentDepartment of Health, Education, and Welfore Office of Education COLLEGE OF EDUCATION rIVERSITY 01. ILLINOIS Urbana - Champaign Campus 1 U S DEPARTMENT Of HEALTH, EDUCATION A WELFARE OFFICE Of EDUCATION THIS DOCUMikl HAS REIN REPRODUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE POISON OP OOGANITATION ORIOINATIOLS IT POINTS Of VIEW OR OPINIONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE Of EDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY. AN APPROACH TO AESTHETIC EDUCATION Contract Number OEC 3-6-061279-1609 Richard Colwell, Project Director The research reported herein was performed pursuant to a contract with the Offices of Education, U.S. -
The Henry Moore Foundation Review Contents
Issue Number Fifteen Winter 2006 The Henry Moore Foundation Review Contents 3 Chairman’s Introduction Sir Ewen Fergusson 4 Director’s Report Tim Llewellyn 7 Financial Statement 2005 – 2006 8 Henry Moore Collections and Exhibitions Anita Feldman Bennet 11 Restoration of Hoglands David Mitchinson 12 Henry Moore Institute Penelope Curtis 15 Publishing Sculpture Studies at the Henry Moore Institute Martina Droth 16 Grants Programme 20 Publications 23 General Information Front Cover: Sheep Piece 1971–72 (LH 627) at Perry Green. Photo: Michael Phipps Tim Llewellyn in 1994 with Moore’s Large Figure in a Shelter 1985– 86 (LH 652c). Photo: Michel Muller Chairman’s Introduction This year has been rich in achievements and there is much Whatever has been achieved over the past year, I must to excite us for the future, but I start with the bad news. now look ahead to a most significant event. Next May, after While last year’s Review was being printed, thieves succeeded thirteen years of extraordinary activity on behalf of the in stealing a large bronze from Perry Green. No trace has Foundation, Timothy Llewellyn will be retiring from the since been found. It is hard to imagine a motive for this post of Director. audacious crime, which inevitably has influenced the Tim Llewellyn came to the Foundation early in 1994 conditions under which we and others will be able to show after a highly successful career at Sotheby’s. He brought sculpture to the public in the future. with him experience in management, a knowledge of finan- In spite of this discouraging beginning, the year has seen cial affairs and, above all, a genuine feel for works of art, many exciting projects brought to fruition, including the historic and contemporary. -
Primitivism in Russian Futurist Book Design 1910–14
Primitivism in Russian Futurist Book Design 1910–14 In the introduction to his book “Primitivism” in 20th ponents in 1913), Russian artists such as Mikhail Jared Ash Century Art, William Rubin notes the relative paucity of Larionov, Natalia Goncharova, Kazimir Malevich, and scholarly works devoted to “primitivism—the interest of Olga Rozanova espoused the fundamental aesthetic prin- modern artists in tribal art and culture, as revealed in ciples and theories, set the priorities, and developed the their thought and work.”1 While considerable attention courage to abandon naturalism in art in favor of free cre- has been paid to primitivism in early-twentieth-century ation, pure expression, and, ultimately, abstraction. French and German art in the time since Rubin’s 1984 The present work focuses on the illustrated publication, Western awareness of a parallel trend in book as the ideal framework in which to examine primi- Russia remains relatively limited to scholars and special- tivism in Russia. Through this medium, artists and writ- ists. Yet, the primary characteristics that Russian artists’ ers of the emerging avant-garde achieved one of the recognized and revered in primitive art forms played as most original responses to, and modern adaptations of, profound a role in shaping the path of modern art and primitivism, and realized the primary goals and aesthetic literature in Russia as they did in the artistic expressions credos set forth in their statements and group mani- of Western Europe. “Primitive” and “primitivism,” as festos. These artists drew on a wide range of primitive they are used in this text, are defined as art or an art art forms from their own country: Old Russian illumin- style that reveals a primacy and purity of expression. -
Tambimuttu: Re-Inventing the Art of Poetry Illustration
Tambimuttu: Re-Inventing the Art of Poetry Illustration Sandra Boselli In 1939, Meary James Thurairajah Tambimuttu, a young poet from Ceylon1 who had recently arrived in London, founded the journal Poetry London, which quickly became ‘the most important poetry publication’2 of the war years. Four years later, in 1943, with the financial backing of the publishers Nicholson & Watson, he launched his book imprint Editions Poetry London (PL). A characteristic feature of both his magazine and poetry books was their inclusion of bespoke illustrations – commissioned from established or emerging artists of the day – that went beyond mere decoration. In the most successful pairings of poet and artist, the combination of word and image achieved a unified purpose despite the apparent mismatch between poems and illustrations, consonant with his credo that ‘it is contrast that teaches us the nature of truth’.3 Tambimuttu’s thought-provoking choice of poems and visual works combined with his belief ‘in the unity of the various arts’,4 enabled the editor to offer his readers first-rate poetry set within aesthetically pleasing books and a periodical in complete contrast to the prosaic-looking literary magazines of the 1930s. Yet, little has been written on this prominent wartime editor who gave so much pleasure to his readers and who was, undoubtedly, an inspiration to other contemporary editors.5 The objective of this article, therefore, is to examine the innovations introduced by Tambimuttu in his publications and to address influences that would have shaped his editorial policy. Much has been written about the controversies that arose in the wake of his departure from Britain in 1949, but little on the nature and scope of his achievements during the ten years spent in London as a successful editor. -
Lyrical Abstraction
Lyrical Abstraction Findlay Galleries presents the group exhibition, Lyrical Abstraction, showcasing works by Mary Abbott, Norman Bluhm, James Brooks, John Ferren, Gordon Onslow Ford, Paul Jenkins, Ronnie Landfield, Frank Lobdell, Emily Mason, Irene Rice Pereira, Robert Richenburg, and Vivian Springford. The Lyrical Abstraction movement emerged in America during the 1960s and 1970s in response to the growth of Minimalism and Conceptual art. Larry Aldrich, founder of the Aldrich Museum, first coined the term Lyrical Abstraction and staged its first exhibition in 1971 at The Whitney Museum of American Art. The exhibition featured works by artists such as Dan Christensen, Ronnie Landfield, and William Pettet. David Shirey, a New York Times critic who reviewed the exhibition, said, “[Lyrical Abstraction] is not interested in fundamentals and forces. It takes them as a means to an end. That end is beauty...” Jackson Pollock’s drip paintings and Mark Rothko’s stained color forms provided important precedence for the movement in which artists adopted a more painterly approach with rich colors and fluid composition. Ronnie Landfield, an artist at the forefront of Lyrical Abstraction calls it “a new sensibility,” stating: ...[Lyrical Abstraction] was painterly, additive, combined different styles, was spiritual, and expressed deep human values. Artists in their studios knew that reduction was no longer necessary for advanced art and that style did not necessarily determine quality or meaning. Lyrical Abstraction was painterly, loose, expressive, ambiguous, landscape-oriented, and generally everything that Minimal Art and Greenbergian Formalism of the mid-sixties were not. Building on Aldrich’s concept of Lyrical Abstractions, Findlay Galleries’ exhibition expands the definition to include artists such as John Ferren, Robert Richenburg and Frank Lobdell. -
Carroll Barnes (March 1–March 15) Carroll Barnes (1906–1997) Worked in Various Careers Before Turning His Attention to Sculpture Full Time at the Age of Thirty
1950 Sculpture in Wood and Stone by Carroll Barnes (March 1–March 15) Carroll Barnes (1906–1997) worked in various careers before turning his attention to sculpture full time at the age of thirty. His skills earned him a position as a professor of art at the University of Texas and commissions from many public and private institutions. His sculptures are created in various media, such as Lucite and steel. This exhibition of the California-based artist’s work presented thirty-seven of his sculptures. Barnes studied with Carl Milles (1875– 1955) at the Cranbrook Academy of Art. [File contents: exhibition flier] Color Compositions by June Wayne (March) June Wayne’s (1918–2011) work received publicity in an article by Jules Langsner, who praised her for developing techniques of drawing the viewer’s eye through imagery and producing a sense of movement in her subjects. Her more recent works (as presented in the show) were drawn from the dilemmas to be found in Franz Kafka’s works. [File contents: two articles, one more appropriate for a later show of 1953 in memoriam Director Donald Bear] Prints by Ralph Scharff (April) Sixteen pieces by Ralph Scharff (1922–1993) were exhibited in the Thayer Gallery. Some of the works included in this exhibition were Apocrypha, I Hate Birds, Walpurgisnacht, Winter 1940, Nine Cats, and Four Cows and Tree Oranges. Watercolors by James Couper Wright (April 3–April 15) Eighteen of James Couper Wright’s (1906–1969) watercolors were presented in this exhibition. Wright was born in Scotland, but made his home in Southern California for the previous eleven years.