Can Civil Society Organizations Solve the Crisis of Partisan Representation in Latin America?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Can Civil Society Organizations Solve the Crisis of Partisan Representation in Latin America? Can Civil Society Organizations Solve the Crisis of Partisan Representation in Latin America? Kathryn Hochstetler Elisabeth Jay Friedman ABSTRACT This article takes up the question of whether civil society organiza- tions (CSOs) can and do act as mechanisms of representation in times of party crisis. It looks at recent representation practices in Argentina, Bolivia, and Brazil, three countries where political par- ties have experienced sharp crises after several decades of mixed reviews for their party systems. At such moments, any replacement of parties by CSOs should be especially apparent. This study con- cludes that the degree of crisis determines the extent that CSOs’ representative functions replace partisan representation, at least in the short term. Where systems show signs of re-equilibration, CSOs offer alternative mechanisms through which citizens can influence political outcomes without seeking to replace parties. Where crisis is profound, CSOs claim some of the basic party functions but do not necessarily solve the problems of partisan representation. he words political party and crisis have become regular compan- T ions in the study of Latin American politics. The empirical referents range from longer-term patterns, such as the instability of partisan iden- tification, to short-term crises resulting in the collapse of party systems. Political parties’ abilities to meet performance, legitimacy, and repre- sentation expectations have all been questioned (e.g., Hagopian 1998; Mainwaring et al. 2006; Pearce 2004). In other contexts, scholars have argued that such crises should lead—and have led—to a transformation of mechanisms of representation: “citizens across the world have shifted from older and traditional forms of representation, such as polit- ical parties and unions, to ‘newer’ modes, such as social movements, informal citizen groups and nongovernmental organizations” (Chandoke 2005, 308). This transformation implies a radical move beyond the parameters of the state-society relationship suggested by pluralism, wherein competing interest groups lobby politicians but parties retain a monopoly on repre- sentation (Dahl 1961). We call such arguments the “crisis of representation hypothesis” because the change in modes of representation is explained primarily through the failure of traditional representation systems (Bartolini © 2008 University of Miami 2 LATIN AMERICAN POLITICS AND SOCIETY 50: 2 and Mair 2001; Chandoke 2005; Lawson and Merkl 1988; Lawson and Poguntke 2004). The implication is that the scope of nonparty representa- tion is an inverse function of the quality of partisan representation. The crisis of representation hypothesis was first developed in the European party literature, and clearly does not explain developments in all of Latin America. In some countries, party system meltdown has led to the reinvention of populist mediation by such leaders as Alberto Fuji- mori in Peru and Hugo Chávez in Venezuela. Citizens in such countries do not have the option of choosing between partisan and “newer” modes of representation, which we refer to collectively as civil society organizations (CSOs). CSOs are weak or have been largely crowded out. In other Latin American countries, however, party crisis does coexist with significant civil society self-organization. The crisis of representa- tion hypothesis prompts us to examine developments in those countries more closely, to see whether CSOs are able to play more extensive rep- resentational roles when parties are weakened. To do so, we compare Argentina, Bolivia, and Brazil, three coun- tries where political parties have experienced sharp crises since 2000 coupled with an upsurge of CSO activity. If the crisis of representation hypothesis has any relevance in Latin America, it should be evident in such countries. Our cases represent a spectrum of crisis intensity, rang- ing from total party system collapse (Bolivia) to partial collapse (Argentina) to delegitimation of the governing parties (Brazil). The hypothesis suggests that there should be more evidence of a substitu- tive shift to the newer CSO forms of representation in Bolivia, and pos- sibly Argentina, than in Brazil. While the hypothesis assumes that CSOs can actually act as repre- sentational mechanisms, this is far from an accepted understanding of their possible roles. Therefore, we begin by offering a conceptual explo- ration of CSOs as modes of representation, using the traditional mecha- nism of political parties as a point of comparison. The discussion also provides the foundation for assessing the different levels and kinds of representation that CSOs might perform. Insider strategies of CSO rep- resentation largely serve as complements to partisan representation, while outsider strategies seek to replace it. Thus the crisis of represen- tation hypothesis anticipates that CSOs will move toward outsider strate- gies as parties founder. The empirical sections of this article characterize the nature and extent of the recent party crises in these three countries, as well as the roles of CSOs during and (if applicable) after the crises. We conclude that there is general support for the crisis of representation hypothesis that the depth of party crisis is related to the scope of nonpartisan rep- resentation. Only in cases of severe crisis is the replacement thesis par- tially upheld; in Bolivia, CSOs really are using outsider strategies to HOCHSTETLER AND FRIEDMAN: CIVIL SOCIETY 3 claim direct party roles alongside parties, including agenda setting, effective decisionmaking, fielding candidates, and checking or revoking executive power. In the more circumscribed crises in Argentina and Brazil, CSOs do not replace parties as mechanisms of representation— and they do not even try to, except for a brief period in Argentina at the height of the crisis in 2001–2, when the nation cycled through five pres- idents in just a few weeks. In both countries, however, even insider CSOs can carry out important representational functions. POLITICAL PARTIES AND CSOS AS MECHANISMS OF REPRESENTATION A curious disconnect exists between theoretical studies of representa- tion and most empirical studies. Theoretically, representation is a con- tested concept, with multiple meanings (e.g., Manin 1997; Pitkin 1967; Saward 2001). At its core, the concept demands that the values and interests of citizens in some way guide those who stand for them in col- lective political processes—functions that could be performed in many ways. Yet empirically, scholars have tended to restrict their focus to the world of parties, elections, and electoral systems, often without com- ment (e.g., Kitschelt 2000; Powell 2004; Przeworski et al. 1999). This article challenges that empirical restriction. It argues that CSOs also can perform what Bartolini and Mair call the political integration functions of partisan representation: articulating and aggregating interests and integrating and mobilizing citizens (Bartolini and Mair 2001). Thus, although CSOs do not generally engage in the specific democratic elec- toral form of representation particular to parties (Peruzzotti 2006; Rehfeld 2006), they fulfill a range of other functions (Friedman and Hochstetler 2002; Fung 2003; Gurza Lavalle et al. 2006). Understanding both parties and CSOs as mechanisms of representation requires careful attention to their structural similarities and differences. Representation by Political Parties Political parties are the primary channel for representation in democra- cies. Following V. O. Key’s influential formulation, parties perform three major groups of functions, each of which is central to representation: parties in the electorate, parties as organizations, and parties in govern- ment (Dalton and Wattenberg 2000, 5–10). Similarly, parties may fail at one or some subset of these functions. In their role of relating to the electorate, parties serve as interpreters for the voting public, presenting different ways to understand political issues and helping voters to determine their general political interests and identities. In doing so, some parties engage in extensive organizing, 4 LATIN AMERICAN POLITICS AND SOCIETY 50: 2 reaching deep into civil society. But many serve exclusively as electoral vehicles that become dormant between electoral cycles. Party-society ties have long been weak in Latin America, but they continue to weaken in the posttransition democracies. Even where party systems were once based on more programmatic and mass-participatory linkages, those ties have now loosened. Personalist, patron-client, and charismatic linkages prevail. The result is party-society relations grounded largely in parties’ electoral ambitions, a thin relationship with little interest and legitimacy for citizens (Pearce 2004; Roberts 2002; Taylor-Robinson 2001). Similar processes are at work in Europe, albeit from higher historical levels of integration (Dalton and Wattenberg 2000; Lawson and Poguntke 2004). In both old and new democracies, citizens are increasingly consumers rather than subjects of politics (Bartolini and Mair 2001, 333). Parties as organizations perform the functions of recruiting elites for office and running their campaigns. Articulating interests and aggre- gating them into broad programs of government are related functions. Latin American parties have generally performed these party functions comparatively well, with the notable exception of the programmatic function. Many Latin American parties lack coherent programs of gov- ernance
Recommended publications
  • Brazil Ahead of the 2018 Elections
    BRIEFING Brazil ahead of the 2018 elections SUMMARY On 7 October 2018, about 147 million Brazilians will go to the polls to choose a new president, new governors and new members of the bicameral National Congress and state legislatures. If, as expected, none of the presidential candidates gains over 50 % of votes, a run-off between the two best-performing presidential candidates is scheduled to take place on 28 October 2018. Brazil's severe and protracted political, economic, social and public-security crisis has created a complex and polarised political climate that makes the election outcome highly unpredictable. Pollsters show that voters have lost faith in a discredited political elite and that only anti- establishment outsiders not embroiled in large-scale corruption scandals and entrenched clientelism would truly match voters' preferences. However, there is a huge gap between voters' strong demand for a radical political renewal based on new faces, and the dramatic shortage of political newcomers among the candidates. Voters' disillusionment with conventional politics and political institutions has fuelled nostalgic preferences and is likely to prompt part of the electorate to shift away from centrist candidates associated with policy continuity to candidates at the opposite sides of the party spectrum. Many less well-off voters would have welcomed a return to office of former left-wing President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (2003-2010), who due to a then booming economy, could run social programmes that lifted millions out of extreme poverty and who, barred by Brazil's judiciary from running in 2018, has tried to transfer his high popularity to his much less-known replacement.
    [Show full text]
  • La Congruencia Aliancista De Los Partidos Argentinos En Elecciones Concurrentes (1983- 2011) Estudios Políticos, Vol
    Estudios Políticos ISSN: 0185-1616 [email protected] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México México Cleric, Paula La congruencia aliancista de los partidos argentinos en elecciones concurrentes (1983- 2011) Estudios Políticos, vol. 9, núm. 36, septiembre-diciembre, 2015, pp. 143-170 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Distrito Federal, México Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=426441558007 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto La congruencia aliancista de los partidos argentinos en elecciones concurrentes (1983 -2011) Paula Clerici* Resumen El presente artículo ofrece un estudio sobre la congruencia de las alianzas electorales en Argen- tina entre 1983 y 2011. Lo anterior a partir de dos acciones: primero, ubicando empíricamente el fenómeno; segundo, conociendo el nivel de congruencia que los partidos han tenido en su política aliancista en los distintos procesos electorales que se presentaron durante el período considerado. La propuesta dedica un apartado especial al Partido Justicialista (PJ) y a la Unión Cívica Radical (UCR), por su importancia sistémica. Palabras clave: alianzas partidistas, partidos políticos, congruencia aliancista, procesos electorales, .Argentina. Abstract This article presents a study on the consistency of the electoral alliances in Argentina between 1983 and 2011. From two actions: first, locating empirically the phenomenon; and second, knowing the level of consistency that the parties have had in their alliance policy in the different electoral processes that occurred during the period.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure A1 General Elections in Argentina, 1995-2019 Figure A2 Vote for Peronists Among Highest-Educated and Top-Income Voters In
    Chapter 15. "Social Inequalities, Identity, and the Structure of Political Cleavages in Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru, 1952-2019" Oscar BARRERA, Ana LEIVA, Clara MARTÍNEZ-TOLEDANO, Álvaro ZÚÑIGA-CORDERO Appendix A - Argentina Main figures and tables Figure A1 General elections in Argentina, 1995-2019 Figure A2 Vote for Peronists among highest-educated and top-income voters in Argentina, after controls Table A1 The structure of political cleavages in Argentina, 2015-2019 Appendix Figures - Structure of the Vote for Peronists Figure AA1 Vote for Peronists by income decile in Argentina Figure AA2 Vote for Peronists by income group in Argentina Figure AA3 Vote for Peronists by education level in Argentina Figure AA4 Vote for Peronists by age group in Argentina Figure AA5 Vote for Peronists by gender in Argentina Figure AA6 Vote for Peronists by marital status in Argentina Figure AA7 Vote for Peronists by employment status in Argentina Figure AA8 Vote for Peronists by employment sector in Argentina Figure AA9 Vote for Peronists by self-employment status in Argentina Figure AA10 Vote for Peronists by occupation in Argentina Figure AA11 Vote for Peronists by subjective social class in Argentina Figure AA12 Vote for Peronists by rural-urban location in Argentina Figure AA13 Vote for Peronists by region in Argentina Figure AA14 Vote for Peronists by ethnicity in Argentina Figure AA15 Vote for Peronists by religious affiliation in Argentina Figure AA16 Vote for Peronists by religiosity in Argentina Figure AA17 Vote for
    [Show full text]
  • Responsabilidade Civil E Solidariedade Social: Potencialidades De Um Diálogo 393
    Responsabilidade civil e solidariedade social: potencialidades de um diálogo 393 Responsabilidade civil e solidariedade social: potencialidades de um diálogo Nelson Rosenvald1 Procurador de Justiça do Ministério Público de Minas Gerais Felipe Braga Netto2 Procurador da República Sumário: 1. Uma palavra introdutória: olhando para trás. 1.1. O individualismo jurídico e as liberdades clássicas do direito civil. 1.2. A tradição patrimonialista que historicamente permeou os institutos civis. 2. A revitalização do direito civil em múltiplas dimensões: o es- pectro normativo da dignidade e da solidariedade social. 3. Os ciclos evolutivos da responsabilidade civil: entre velhas estruturas e novas funções. 3.1. Os degraus da responsabilidade civil: um olhar através dos ciclos históricos. 4. Proposições conclusivas. 1. Uma palavra introdutória: olhando para trás Para bem compreendermos o novo, é essencial conhecer o que havia antes. Seja para evitar o apego anacrônico a modelos teóricos que já não nos servem, seja para evitar que nos deixemos seduzir ir- refletidamente pela (leviana) novidade. O novo não é necessariamente sinônimo de qualidade. O autenticamente novo é um fiel depositário 1 Pós-Doutor em Direito Civil na Universidade de Roma Tre (Itália). Professor Visitante na Oxford Uni- versity (Inglaterra). Professor Pesquisador na Universidade de Coimbra (Portugal). Doutor e Mestre em Direito Civil pela PUC-SP. Bacharel em Direito pela Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Membro do European Law Institute (ELI). Membro da Society of Legal Scholars (Inglaterra). Membro do Comitê Científico da Revista Actualidad Juridica Iberoamericana (Espanha). Coautor do Curso de Direito Civil, do Novo Tratado de Responsabilidade Civil, e do Volume Único de Direito Civil.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transformation of Party-Union Linkages in Argentine Peronism, 1983–1999*
    FROM LABOR POLITICS TO MACHINE POLITICS: The Transformation of Party-Union Linkages in Argentine Peronism, 1983–1999* Steven Levitsky Harvard University Abstract: The Argentine (Peronist) Justicialista Party (PJ)** underwent a far- reaching coalitional transformation during the 1980s and 1990s. Party reformers dismantled Peronism’s traditional mechanisms of labor participation, and clientelist networks replaced unions as the primary linkage to the working and lower classes. By the early 1990s, the PJ had transformed from a labor-dominated party into a machine party in which unions were relatively marginal actors. This process of de-unionization was critical to the PJ’s electoral and policy success during the presidency of Carlos Menem (1989–99). The erosion of union influ- ence facilitated efforts to attract middle-class votes and eliminated a key source of internal opposition to the government’s economic reforms. At the same time, the consolidation of clientelist networks helped the PJ maintain its traditional work- ing- and lower-class base in a context of economic crisis and neoliberal reform. This article argues that Peronism’s radical de-unionization was facilitated by the weakly institutionalized nature of its traditional party-union linkage. Although unions dominated the PJ in the early 1980s, the rules of the game governing their participation were always informal, fluid, and contested, leaving them vulner- able to internal changes in the distribution of power. Such a change occurred during the 1980s, when office-holding politicians used patronage resources to challenge labor’s privileged position in the party. When these politicians gained control of the party in 1987, Peronism’s weakly institutionalized mechanisms of union participation collapsed, paving the way for the consolidation of machine politics—and a steep decline in union influence—during the 1990s.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Liberties: 2 Aggregate Score: 83 Freedom Rating: 2.0 Overview
    Argentina Page 1 of 8 Published on Freedom House (https://freedomhouse.org) Home > Argentina Argentina Country: Argentina Year: 2018 Freedom Status: Free Political Rights: 2 Civil Liberties: 2 Aggregate Score: 83 Freedom Rating: 2.0 Overview: Argentina is a vibrant representative democracy, with competitive elections and lively public debate. Corruption and drug-related violence are among the country’s most serious challenges. Political Rights and Civil Liberties: POLITICAL RIGHTS: 33 / 40 A. ELECTORAL PROCESS: 11 / 12 A1. Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? 4 / 4 The constitution provides for a president to be elected for a four-year term, with the option of reelection for one additional term. Presidential candidates must win 45 percent of the vote to avoid a runoff. Mauricio Macri was elected president in 2015 in a poll deemed competitive and credible by international observers. A2. Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? 4 / 4 https://freedomhouse.org/print/49941 9/14/2018 Argentina Page 2 of 8 The National Congress consists of a 257-member the Chamber of Deputies, whose representatives are directly elected for four-year terms with half of the seats up for election every two years; and the 72-member Senate, whose representatives are directly elected for six-year terms, with one third of the seats up for election every two years. Legislators are elected through a proportional representation system with a closed party list. Legislative elections, including the most recent held in October 2017, are generally free and fair.
    [Show full text]
  • Argentina: from Kirchner to Kirchner
    ArgentinA: From Kirchner to Kirchner Steven Levitsky and María Victoria Murillo Steven Levitsky is professor of government at Harvard University. María Victoria Murillo is associate professor of political science and international affairs at Columbia University. Together they edited Ar- gentine Democracy: The Politics of Institutional Weakness (2005). Argentina’s 28 October 2007 presidential election contrasted sharply with the one that preceded it. The 2003 race took place in the after- math of an unprecedented economic collapse and the massive December 2001 protests that toppled two presidents in a span of ten days. That election—which was won by little-known (Peronist) Justicialist Party governor Néstor Kirchner—was held in a climate of political fragmenta- tion and uncertainty. Little uncertainty surrounded the 2007 campaign. After four years of strong economic growth, and with the opposition in shambles, a victory by the incumbent Peronists was a foregone conclu- sion. The only surprise was that Kirchner, who remained popular, chose not to seek reelection. Instead, his wife, Senator Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, ran in his place. Cristina Kirchner captured 45 percent of the vote, easily defeating Elisa Carrió of the left-of-center Civic Coalition (23 percent) and Kirch- ner’s former economics minister, Roberto Lavagna (17 percent), who was backed by the Radical Civic Union (UCR). In addition to winning more than three-quarters of Argentina’s 23 governorships, the Justicial- ist Party (PJ) and other pro-Kirchner allies won large majorities in both legislative chambers. In the Chamber of Deputies, the lower house of Argentina’s bicameral National Congress, progovernment Peronists and other Kirchner allies (including pro-Kirchner Radicals) won 160 of 257 seats, while dissident Peronists won another 10 seats.
    [Show full text]
  • Os Percursos Da Cidadania Na Geografia Escolar Portuguesa
    UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA INSTITUTO DE GEOGRAFIA E ORDENAMENTO DO TERRITÓRIO OS PERCURSOS DA CIDADANIA NA GEOGRAFIA ESCOLAR PORTUGUESA Maria Helena Mariano de Brito Fidalgo Esteves DOUTORAMENTO EM GEOGRAFIA ESPECIALIDADE ENSINO DA GEOGRAFIA 2010 UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA INSTITUTO DE GEOGRAFIA E ORDENAMENTO DO TERRITÓRIO OS PERCURSOS DA CIDADANIA NA GEOGRAFIA ESCOLAR PORTUGUESA Maria Helena Mariano de Brito Fidalgo Esteves DOUTORAMENTO EM GEOGRAFIA ESPECIALIDADE ENSINO DA GEOGRAFIA TESE ORIENTADA PELA PROF. DOUTORA TERESA BARATA SALGUEIRO 2010 Resumo A Geografia escolar portuguesa abraçou nas últimas décadas o desafio da adaptação a um mundo em mudança, protagonizando pela Reforma do Sistema Educativo (Decreto-Lei n.º 286/89, de 29 de Agosto) e pela Reorganização Curricular do Ensino Básico (Decreto-Lei n.º 6/2001, de 18 de Janeiro). No âmbito de um ensino que seja capaz de contribuir para a formação de cidadãos conscientes e participativos numa sociedade democrática, a Geografia escolar, durante os anos 90, vai aprofundar o estudo da Europa e preocupar-se com a problemática do desenvolvimento sustentável. Mais recentemente, e em articulação com o Currículo Nacional do Ensino Básico, vai afirmar-se como uma disciplina vocacionada para uma melhor compreensão do mundo nas suas dimensões cultural, social e ambiental, assumindo-se como tendo um papel fundamental na formação e informação de futuros cidadãos. Esta investigação teve como objectivo conhecer de que forma os professores de Geografia têm percepcionado estas mudanças curriculares. Os professores foram estudados, através do conhecimento dos seus discursos e das suas práticas. Procurou-se igualmente conhecer a sua opinião sobre a importância da Geografia como disciplina vocacionada para uma educação para a cidadania.
    [Show full text]
  • Macro Report Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 4: Macro Report September 10, 2012
    Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 1 Module 4: Macro Report Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 4: Macro Report September 10, 2012 Country: Argentina Date of Election: October 25, 2015 Prepared by: Noam Lupu, Carlos Gervasoni, Virginia Oliveros, and Luis Schiumerini Date of Preparation: December 2016 NOTES TO COLLABORATORS: . The information provided in this report contributes to an important part of the CSES project. The information may be filled out by yourself, or by an expert or experts of your choice. Your efforts in providing these data are greatly appreciated! Any supplementary documents that you can provide (e.g., electoral legislation, party manifestos, electoral commission reports, media reports) are also appreciated, and may be made available on the CSES website. Answers should be as of the date of the election being studied. Where brackets [ ] appear, collaborators should answer by placing an “X” within the appropriate bracket or brackets. For example: [X] . If more space is needed to answer any question, please lengthen the document as necessary. Data Pertinent to the Election at which the Module was Administered 1a. Type of Election [ ] Parliamentary/Legislative [X] Parliamentary/Legislative and Presidential [ ] Presidential [ ] Other; please specify: __________ 1b. If the type of election in Question 1a included Parliamentary/Legislative, was the election for the Upper House, Lower House, or both? [ ] Upper House [ ] Lower House [X] Both [ ] Other; please specify: __________ Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 2 Module 4: Macro Report 2a. What was the party of the president prior to the most recent election, regardless of whether the election was presidential? Frente para la Victoria, FPV (Front for Victory)1 2b.
    [Show full text]
  • Populism from A
    Addressing European Populism from a Sustainability Policy Perspective Sara Gottenhuber & Eric Mulholland ESDN Quarterly Report 53 1 July 2019 This report is published as a work of the ESDN Office. The opinions expressed do not reflect the official views of ESDN Steering Group countries. Please cite this publication as: Gottenhuber, S., Mulholland, E. “Addressing European Populism from a Sustainability Policy Perspective”, ESDN Quarterly Report 53, July 2019, ESDN Office, Vienna. AUTHORS: Sara Gottenhuber & Eric Mulholland, ESDN Office CONTACT: ESDN Office Institute for Managing Sustainability Vienna University of Economics and Business Welthandelsplatz 1, A-1020 Vienna, Austria [email protected] +43-1-31336-4807 © 2019 EUROPEAN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT NETWORK (ESDN) 2 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 4 CHAPTER 1: POTENTIAL INCONGRUENCES BETWEEN POPULISM AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................................................................................... 5 WHAT IS POPULISM? ................................................................................................................................ 5 IS ALL POPULISM BAD? .............................................................................................................................. 6 POPULISM AND SUSTAINABILITY ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PERONISM and ANTI-PERONISM: SOCIAL-CULTURAL BASES of POLITICAL IDENTITY in ARGENTINA PIERRE OSTIGUY University of California
    PERONISM AND ANTI-PERONISM: SOCIAL-CULTURAL BASES OF POLITICAL IDENTITY IN ARGENTINA PIERRE OSTIGUY University of California at Berkeley Department of Political Science 210 Barrows Hall Berkeley, CA 94720 [email protected] Paper presented at the LASA meeting, in Guadalajara, Mexico, on April 18, 1997 This paper is about political identity and the related issue of types of political appeals in the public arena. It thus deals with a central aspect of political behavior, regarding both voters' preferences and identification, and politicians' electoral strategies. Based on the case of Argentina, it shows the at times unsuspected but unmistakable impact of class-cultural, and more precisely, social-cultural differences on political identity and electoral behavior. Arguing that certain political identities are social-culturally based, this paper introduces a non-ideological, but socio-politically significant, axis of political polarization. As observed in the case of Peronism and anti-Peronism in Argentina, social stratification, particularly along an often- used compound, in surveys, of socio-economic status and education,1 is tightly associated with political behavior, but not so much in Left-Right political terms or even in issue terms (e.g. socio- economic platforms or policies), but rather in social-cultural terms, as seen through the modes and type of political appeals, and figuring centrally in certain already constituted political identities. Forms of political appeals may be mapped in terms of a two-dimensional political space, defined by the intersection of this social-cultural axis with the traditional Left-to-Right spectrum. Also, since already constituted political identities have their origins in the successful "hailing"2 of pluri-facetted people and groups, such a bi-dimensional space also maps political identities.
    [Show full text]
  • Populism and the Economics of Globalization
    Journal of International Business Policy (2018) ª 2018 Academy of International Business All rights reserved 2522-0691/18 www.jibp.net Populism and the economics of globalization Dani Rodrik Abstract Populism may seem like it has come out of nowhere, but it has been on the rise John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard for a while. I argue that economic history and economic theory both provide University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA ample grounds for anticipating that advanced stages of economic globalization would produce a political backlash. While the backlash may have been Correspondence: predictable, the specific form it took was less so. I distinguish between left-wing D Rodrik, John F. Kennedy School of and right-wing variants of populism, which differ with respect to the societal Government, Harvard University, cleavages that populist politicians highlight. The first has been predominant in Cambridge, MA 02138, USA Latin America, and the second in Europe. I argue that these different reactions e-mail: [email protected] are related to the relative salience of different types of globalization shocks. Journal of International Business Policy (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-018-0001-4 Keywords: populism; globalization; Latin America; Europe INTRODUCTION ‘‘Populism’’ is a loose label that encompasses a diverse set of movements. The term originates from the late nineteenth century, when a coalition of farmers, workers, and miners in the US rallied against the Gold Standard and the Northeastern banking and finance establishment. Latin America has a long tradition of populism going back to the 1930s, and exemplified by Peronism. Today populism spans a wide gamut of political movements, including anti-euro and anti-immigrant parties in Europe, and Syriza and Podemos in Greece and Spain, respectively, Trump’s antitrade nativism in the US, the economic populism of Chavez in Latin America, and many others in between.
    [Show full text]