DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation of Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Blank Data And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation of Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Blank Data And Prepared in cooperation with the California State Water Resources Control Board A product of the California Groundwater Ambient Monitoring and Assessment (GAMA) Program Evaluation of Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Blank Data and Application of Study Reporting Levels to Groundwater Data Collected for the California GAMA Priority Basin Project, May 2004 through September 2010 Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5139 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Left: Field crew member collecting VOC samples inside a mobile laboratory using long sampling lines. (Photograph by Cathy M. Munday, U.S. Geological Survey.) Right: Field crew members collecting VOC samples at a well site using short sampling lines. (Photograph by Michael T. Land, U.S. Geological Survey.) Evaluation of Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Blank Data and Application of Study Reporting Levels to Groundwater Data Collected for the California GAMA Priority Basin Project, May 2004 through September 2010 By Miranda S. Fram, Lisa D. Olsen, and Kenneth Belitz A product of the California Groundwater Ambient Monitoring and Assessment (GAMA) Program Prepared in cooperation with the California State Water Resources Control Board Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5139 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Fram, M.S., Olsen, L.D., and Belitz, Kenneth, 2012, Evaluation of volatile organic compound (VOC) blank data and application of study reporting levels to groundwater data collected for the California GAMA Priority Basin Project, May 2004 through September 2010: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5139, 94 p. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................2 Use of Study Reporting Levels ............................................................................................................4 Philosophy of Quality-Control Evaluation of Blanks ........................................................................5 Purpose and Scope .............................................................................................................................6 Methods Used to Collect and Evaluate VOC Data ....................................................................................7 Field Methods ........................................................................................................................................7 Groundwater Samples ................................................................................................................7 Blanks .........................................................................................................................................10 Laboratory Methods ...........................................................................................................................11 Data Analysis Methods ......................................................................................................................14 Identification of Representative Field Blanks .......................................................................15 Definition of Study Reporting Levels (SRLs) ..........................................................................16 Binomial Probability Approach .......................................................................................16 Maximum Concentration Approach ..............................................................................18 Maximum LT-MDL Approach ..........................................................................................18 Evaluation of Potential Sources of Contamination to Blanks and Groundwater Samples and Selection of Appropriate SRLs ....................................................................18 Statistical Tests Used in Identification of Representative Field Blanks and Evaluation to Infer Potential Sources of Contamination ....................................................................19 Quality-Control Assessment Results ........................................................................................................20 Identification of VOCs for Which the SRL Approach Can be Applied and of Representative Quality-Control Field Blanks (QCFBs) for Use in Calculation of SRLs ....................................................................................................................................20 Minimal Contamination from the Certified Blank Water .....................................................20 Acetone, 2-Butanone, and Tetrahydrofuran Contamination Associated with Methanol ........................................................................................................................20 Inadvertent Field Test of Contamination by Methanol ................................................20 Acetone, 2-Butanone, and Tetrahydrofuran Contamination in Field Blanks...........26 Acetone, 2-Butanone, and Tetrahydrofuran Contamination in Groundwater Samples ................................................................................................................26 SRLs for Acetone, 2-Butanone, and Tetrahydrofuran.................................................31 Differences Between Sample-Collection Equipment Configurations ...............................31 Quality-Control Field Blanks (QCFBs) .....................................................................................32 iv Contents—Continued Quality-Control Assessment Results—Continued Evaluation of Potential Sources of Contamination, Selection of SRLs, and Application of SRLs to Groundwater Data for VOCs Detected in Blanks ..........................................32 Hydrocarbons .............................................................................................................................32 Ethylbenzene, m- and p-Xylenes, o-Xylene, Benzene, and Styrene ........................32 Inferred Mechanisms of Contamination .............................................................38 SRLs for Ethylbenzene, m- and p-Xylenes, o-Xylene, Benzene, and Styrene .........................................................................................................40 Toluene ...............................................................................................................................45 Inferred Mechanisms of Contamination ..............................................................45 SRL for Toluene ........................................................................................................48 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ....................................................................................................48 Inferred Mechanisms of Contamination ..............................................................50 SRL for 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene .............................................................................53 Chlorinated Organic Solvents ..................................................................................................54 Dichloromethane, 1,1-Dichloroethene, and Trichloroethene ....................................54 Tetrachloroethene ............................................................................................................54 Other VOCs ..................................................................................................................................54 Bromodichloromethane and Trichlorofluoromethane ................................................54 Carbon Disulfide ................................................................................................................61 Inferred Source of Contamination ........................................................................61 SRL for Carbon Disulfide .........................................................................................61 Chloroform .........................................................................................................................63 Inferred Source of Contamination ........................................................................63 SRL for Chloroform ..................................................................................................63 Application of SRLs and Maximum LT-MDLS ..........................................................................................65 Effect of LT-MDL Changes on VOC Detection Frequencies .........................................................65
Load more
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

101 pages remaining, click to load more.

Recommended publications
  • Chemistry Department 32.Pdf (10.36Mb)
    THE FABRICATION OF NANOMETRIC METAL SULFIDES FROM XANTHATE PRECURSORS By ALAN PIQUETTE Bachelor of Arts Western State College of Colorado Gunnison, Colorado 2002 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University In partial fulfillment of The requirements for The Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December, 2007 THE FABRICATION OF NANOMETRIC METAL SULFIDES FROM XANTHATE PRECURSORS Thesis Approved: _______________ __Allen Apblett___ ______________ Thesis Advisor ________________ Nicholas Materer_____ __________ _____________ __LeGrande Slaughter___ __________ _______________ ____Jim Smay___ _______________ _____________ __A. Gordon Emslie___ ____________ Dean of the Graduate College ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It is with my utmost sincere appreciation that I acknowledge my thesis advisor, Dr. Allen W. Apblett, for his support, guidance, and motivation. He provided a research environment that was both friendly and challenging, which made my years in his group enjoyable and rewarding. His broad range of knowledge was something of which I was happy to take advantage. His dedication to teaching and research is something that will be a positive influence on me for the rest of my scientific career. I would like to express gratitude to my committee members: Dr. Nicholas Materer, Dr. LeGrande Slaughter, and Dr. Jim Smay, for their assistance, advice, guidance, and support throughout the years. I am deeply grateful to all my colleagues and friends in the chemistry department. I would specifically like to thank Sulaiman Al-Fadul, Mohammed Al-Hazmi, Zeid Al- Othmann, Mohamed Chehbouni, Satish Kuriyavar, and Tarek Trad for showing me the ropes, for their valuable discussions, continuous encouragement, and for all the help they extended during the course of my stay in the Apblett Group.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Patent (113,607,865
    United States Patent (113,607,865 (72) Inventors John Dyer (56) References Cited Media; UNITED STATES PATENTS Lyle H. Phifer, West Chester, both of Pa. 2,694,723 l l 11954 Schramm ..................... 260/455 B 2l Appl. No. 732,551 2,761,247 9/1956 Meadows.... a 260/216 22 Filed May 28, 1968 2,825,655 3/1958 Meadows..................... 260/216 45) Patented Sept. 21, 1971 2,910,466 101959 Watt............................. 260/216 73) Assignee FMC Corporation Philadelphia, Pa. 3.141023,103,507 9/19637/1964 O'Boyle...Knoevenagel. 260/234 Primary Examiner-Lewis Gotts (54) PREPARATION OFXANTHATES Assistant Examiner-Johnnie R. Brown 10 Claims, No Drawings Attorneys-Thomas R. O'Malley, George F. Mueller and Robert G. Hoffmann 52) U.S.C........................................................ 260/234 R, 260/26, 260/455 B 51 int. Cl......................................................... C07c69132 ABSTRACT: A method of forming alcohol xanthates utilizing 50 Field of Search............................................ 260/455 B, a transXanthation reaction between an alcohol xanthate and 234,216 an alcohol, is disclosed herein. 3,607,865 PREPARATION OFXANTHATES erythritol Alcohol xanthic acids and their derivatives are known to be sorbital useful for a variety of applications including mineral flotation glucose agents, sulfidizing agents, rubber vulcanization accelerators, mannitol adhesives and as intermediates in the preparation of shaped 2-methoxyethanol articles, for example, regenerated cellulose fibers and films. 2-ethoxyethanol In general, alcohol xanthates have been derived by reacting 2-butoxyethanol carbon disulfide with simple and complex alcohols under al diethyleneglycol ethylether kaline conditions. Reactions of this type have been known for polyethylene glycols many years and may be seen, for example, in many prior U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • An Improved Method for BTEX Extraction From
    Analytical Methods Accepted Manuscript This is an Accepted Manuscript, which has been through the Royal Society of Chemistry peer review process and has been accepted for publication. Accepted Manuscripts are published online shortly after acceptance, before technical editing, formatting and proof reading. Using this free service, authors can make their results available to the community, in citable form, before we publish the edited article. We will replace this Accepted Manuscript with the edited and formatted Advance Article as soon as it is available. You can find more information about Accepted Manuscripts in the Information for Authors. Please note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the text and/or graphics, which may alter content. The journal’s standard Terms & Conditions and the Ethical guidelines still apply. In no event shall the Royal Society of Chemistry be held responsible for any errors or omissions in this Accepted Manuscript or any consequences arising from the use of any information it contains. www.rsc.org/methods Page 1 of 6 Analytical Methods 1 2 Analytical Methods RSC Publishing 3 4 5 TECHNICAL NOTE 6 7 8 9 An improved method for BTEX extraction from 10 charcoal 11 Cite this: DOI: 10.1039/x0xx00000x 12 13 Raffaele Cucciniello a, Antonio Proto a,*, Federico Rossi a, Nadia 14 b c 15 Marchettini , Oriana Motta Received 00th January 2015, 16 Accepted 00th January 2015 17 Abstract In this paper we propose a simple procedure for the extraction of BTEX (benzene, 18 DOI: 10.1039/x0xx00000x toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes) from activated charcoal. For this purpose synthetic samples 19 www.rsc.org/ were prepared in laboratory and real samples were collected in a polluted environment using 20 21 passive sampling.
    [Show full text]
  • 1997-11-12 Carbon Disulfide As Federal Hazardous Air Pollutant
    CARBON DISULFIDE Carbon disulfide is a federal hazardous air pollutant and was identified as a toxic air contaminant in April 1993 under AB 2728. CAS Registry Number: 75-15-0 CS2 Molecular Formula: CS2 Carbon disulfide is a highly refractive, mobile, and very flammable liquid. The purest distillates have a sweet odor. However, the usual commercial and reagent grades of carbon disulfide are foul smelling. It burns with a blue flame to form carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide. Liquid carbon disulfide will attack some forms of plastics, rubber, and coatings but is non- corrosive to most commercial structural materials at ordinary temperatures. It is miscible in water, alcohol, oils, chloroform, and ether (Merck, 1989). Physical Properties of Carbon Disulfide Synonyms: carbon bisulfide; carbon disulphide; carbon sulfide; sulphocarbonic anhydride; sulphuret of carbon; dithiocarbonic anhydride Molecular Weight: 76.14 Boiling Point: 46.5 oC Melting Point: -111.5 oC Vapor Density: 2.67 (air =1) Flash Point: -30 oC (closed cup) Density/Specific Gravity: 1.2632 at 20/4 oC (water = 1) Critical Temperature: 280 oC Vapor Pressure: 297 mm Hg at 20 oC Log Octanol/Water Partition Coefficient: 1.70 - 4.16 Conversion Factor: 1 ppm = 3.11 mg/m3 (Howard, 1990; HSDB, 1991; Merck, 1989; U.S. EPA, 1994a) SOURCES AND EMISSIONS A. Sources Carbon disulfide is used in the preparation of rayon viscose fibers, and as a solvent for lipids, phosphorus, sulfur, selenium, bromine, iodine, rubber, resins, and waxes (Proctor et al, 1991). Carbon disulfide is also used in the manufacture of carbon tetrachloride, cellophane, flotation Toxic Air Contaminant Identification List Summaries - ARB/SSD/SES September 1997 193 Carbon Disulfide agents, xanthogenates, and numerous other chemicals (HSDB, 1991; Sax, 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • Carbonyl Sulfide, Dimethyl Sulfide and Carbon Disulfide In
    Atmospheric Environment 44 (2010) 3805e3813 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Atmospheric Environment journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/atmosenv Carbonyl sulfide, dimethyl sulfide and carbon disulfide in the Pearl River Delta of southern China: Impact of anthropogenic and biogenic sources H. Guo a,*, I.J. Simpson b, A.J. Ding c,T.Wanga, S.M. Saunders d, T.J. Wang c, H.R. Cheng a, B. Barletta b, S. Meinardi b, D.R. Blake b, F.S. Rowland b a Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong b Department of Chemistry, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, USA c School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, China d School of Biomedical, Biomolecular and Chemical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia article info abstract Article history: Reduced sulfur compounds (RSCs) such as carbonyl sulfide (OCS), dimethyl sulfide (DMS) and carbon Received 28 October 2009 disulfide (CS2) impact radiative forcing, ozone depletion, and acid rain. Although Asia is a large source of Received in revised form these compounds, until now a long-term study of their emission patterns has not been carried out. Here 19 June 2010 we analyze 16 months of RSC data measured at a polluted rural/coastal site in the greater Pearl River Accepted 22 June 2010 Delta (PRD) of southern China. A total of 188 canister air samples were collected from August 2001 to December 2002. The OCS and CS2 mixing ratios within these samples were higher in autumn/winter and Keywords: lower in summer due to the influence of Asian monsoon circulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Modification of Xanthate Collectors to Enhance the Flotation
    Article pubs.acs.org/IECR Structural Modification of Xanthate Collectors To Enhance the Flotation Selectivity of Chalcopyrite † ‡ † † † Xin Ma, Liuyin Xia, Shuai Wang,*, Hong Zhong,*, and Hui Jia † College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, People’s Republic of China ‡ Surface Science, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6G0J3, Canada *S Supporting Information ABSTRACT: A modified xanthate compound similar to xanthogen formates, S-benzoyl O-isobutyl xanthate (BIBX), was designed by introducing a carbonyl and a benzyl group into the xanthate structure. The preparation, recovery performance, and mechanism of adsorption of this compound to chalcopyrite is discussed. BIBX was synthesized using a one-pot approach with superior efficiency, which has important commercial implications. BIBX’s performance in the recovery of and mechanism of adsorption to chalcopyrite was investigated via flotation tests, adsorption quantity measurements, FTIR spectroscopy, X- ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and density functional theory (DFT) calculations. The results show that BIBX displays a substantially stronger collecting ability toward chalcopyrite than sodium isobutyl xanthate and O-isopropyl-N- ethylthionocarbamate. Moreover, BIBX displays superior selectivity for chalcopyrite compared to pyrite. The adsorption data indicate that BIBX can be applied under slightly acidic or alkaline conditions. BIBX behaves like a bidentate ligand, bonding with the chalcopyrite copper through the thiol sulfur and carbonyl oxygen atoms. These findings are supported by FTIR and XPS data. DFT calculations predict two distinct adsorption geometries, one with one Cu atom to form a six-membered ring complex and another with two Cu atoms to form an “irregular pentagon”-shaped complex. 1. INTRODUCTION atom.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Analysis of Carbon Disulfide (CS2) Using the 3-D Chemistry Transport Model STOCHEM
    AIMS Environmental Science, 4(3): 484-501. DOI: 10.3934/environsci.2017.3.484 Received: 13 March 2017 Accepted: 17 May 2017 Published: 22 May 2017 http://www.aimspress.com/journal/environmental Research article Global analysis of carbon disulfide (CS2) using the 3-D chemistry transport model STOCHEM Anwar Khan1, Benjamin Razis1, Simon Gillespie1, Carl Percival2,! and Dudley Shallcross1,* 1 Atmospheric Chemistry Research Group, School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Cantock’s Close, Bristol BS8 1TS, UK 2 The Centre for Atmospheric Science, The School of Earth, Atmospheric and Environmental Science, The University of Manchester, Simon Building, Brunswick Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK ! Now at NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 4800 Oak Grove Dr, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA * Correspondence: Email: d.e.shallcross@bristol.ac.uk; Tel: +44 (0) 117-928-7796. Abstract: Carbon disulfide (CS2), a precursor to the long-lived carbonyl sulphide (OCS) is one of the main contributors to the atmospheric sulfate layer. The annual fluxes from its sources and sinks are investigated using a 3-D chemistry transport model, STOCHEM-CRI. In terms of the flux analysis, the oxidation of CS2 by OH is found to be the main removal process (76–88% of the total loss) and the dry deposition loss contributes 11–24% to the total loss of CS2. The global burden of CS2 was calculated, varying between 6.1 to 19.2 Tg and the lifetime of CS2 was determined to be within the range of 2.8–3.4 days. The global distribution of CS2 found the Northern Hemisphere (NH) continental landmasses to be the areas of concentration maxima with peak concentrations reaching up to 20 ppt during June-July-August (J-J-A) season and 40 ppt during December-January-February (D-J-F) season in anthropogenic source regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Thiocarbonyl Complexes of Iron Jan Wallace Dunker Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1981 Thiocarbonyl complexes of iron Jan Wallace Dunker Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Inorganic Chemistry Commons Recommended Citation Dunker, Jan Wallace, "Thiocarbonyl complexes of iron " (1981). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 6900. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/6900 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact digirep@iastate.edu. INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the film inspector noticed either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy.
    [Show full text]
  • New Eco-Friendly Xanthate-Based Flotation Agents
    minerals Article New Eco-Friendly Xanthate-Based Flotation Agents Milutin M. Milosavljevi´c 1,*, Aleksandar D. Marinkovi´c 2, Milica Ranˇci´c 3, Goran Milentijevi´c 1, Aleksandra Bogdanovi´c 2, Ilija N. Cvijeti´c 4 and Dejan Gureši´c 1 1 Faculty of Technical Science, University of Priština, Knjaza Miloša 7, 38220 Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia; goranmilentijevickm@gmail.com (G.M.); dejan.guresic@pr.ac.rs (D.G.) 2 Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy, University of Belgrade, Karnegijeva 4, P.O. Box 3503, 11120 Belgrade, Serbia; marinko@tmf.bg.ac.rs (A.D.M.); abogdanovic@tmf.bg.ac.rs (A.B.) 3 Faculty of Forestry, University of Belgrade, Kneza Višeslava 1, 11030 Beograd, Serbia; milica.rancic@sfb.bg.ac.rs 4 Innovation center of the Faculty of Chemistry, University of Belgrade, Studentski trg 12, 11158 Belgrade, Serbia; ilija@chem.bg.ac.rs * Correspondence: milutin.milosavljevic@pr.ac.rs Received: 25 March 2020; Accepted: 10 April 2020; Published: 14 April 2020 Abstract: An optimal laboratory two-step procedure was developed for sodium/potassium O-alkyl carbonodithioate (sodium/potassium alkyl xanthates) production in the form of aqueous solutions. Sodium isopropyl xanthate (Na-iPrX), as the most effective salt in a real ore flotation process, was also produced at an industrial level and introduced as a collector for copper ores. In order to reduce toxicity of the flotation process and improve sustainability by minimising environmental impacts, collector efficiency and selectivity in the flotation process were studied in relation to possible synergism of xanthates combined with the derived biomass and biodegradable green reagents levulinic acid, 5-hydroxymethyl-2-furanacrylic acid (HMFA), and condensation product of hydroxymethylfurfural and levulinic acid.
    [Show full text]
  • EPA's Hazardous Waste Listing
    Hazardous Waste Listings A User-Friendly Reference Document September 2012 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Overview of the Hazardous Waste Identification Process .............................................................. 5 Lists of Hazardous Wastes .............................................................................................................. 5 Summary Chart ............................................................................................................................... 8 General Hazardous Waste Listing Resources ................................................................................. 9 § 261.11 Criteria for listing hazardous waste. .............................................................................. 11 Subpart D-List of Hazardous Wastes ............................................................................................ 12 § 261.31 Hazardous wastes from non-specific sources. ............................................................... 13 Spent solvent wastes (F001 – F005) ......................................................................................... 13 Wastes from electroplating and other metal finishing operations (F006 - F012, and F019) ... 18 Dioxin bearing wastes (F020 - F023, and F026 – F028) .......................................................... 22 Wastes from production of certain chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons (F024
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon Disulfide
    SIGMA-ALDRICH sigma-aldrich.com SAFETY DATA SHEET Version 5.2 Revision Date 02/26/2014 Print Date 02/27/2014 1. PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION 1.1 Product identifiers Product name : Carbon disulfide Product Number : 335266 Brand : Sigma-Aldrich Index-No. : 006-003-00-3 REACH No. : A registration number is not available for this substance as the substance or its uses are exempted from registration, the annual tonnage does not require a registration or the registration is envisaged for a later registration deadline. CAS-No. : 75-15-0 1.2 Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against Identified uses : Laboratory chemicals, Manufacture of substances 1.3 Details of the supplier of the safety data sheet Company : Sigma-Aldrich 3050 Spruce Street SAINT LOUIS MO 63103 USA Telephone : +1 800-325-5832 Fax : +1 800-325-5052 1.4 Emergency telephone number Emergency Phone # : (314) 776-6555 2. HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION 2.1 Classification of the substance or mixture GHS Classification in accordance with 29 CFR 1910 (OSHA HCS) Flammable liquids (Category 2), H225 Acute toxicity, Oral (Category 4), H302 Skin irritation (Category 2), H315 Eye irritation (Category 2A), H319 Reproductive toxicity (Category 2), H361 Specific target organ toxicity - repeated exposure, Inhalation (Category 1), H372 Acute aquatic toxicity (Category 3), H402 Chronic aquatic toxicity (Category 3), H412 For the full text of the H-Statements mentioned in this Section, see Section 16. 2.2 GHS Label elements, including precautionary statements Pictogram Signal word Danger Hazard statement(s) H225 Highly flammable liquid and vapour. H302 Harmful if swallowed.
    [Show full text]
  • Acutely Toxic (P-List) Hazardous Chemical Substance Waste No
    Appendix D Discarded commercial chemical products, off-specification species, container residues, and spill residues thereof; acutely toxic (P-list) Hazardous Chemical Substance waste No. abstracts No. P023 107-20-0 Acetaldehyde, chloro- P002 591-08-2 Acetamide, N-(aminothioxomethyl)- P057 640-19-7 Acetamide, 2-fluoro- P058 62-74-8 Acetic acid, fluoro-, sodium salt P002 591-08-2 1-Acetyl-2-thiourea P003 107-02-8 Acrolein P070 116-06-3 Aldicarb P203 1646-88-4 Aldicarb sulfone. P004 309-00-2 Aldrin P005 107-18-6 Allyl alcohol P006 20859-73-8 Aluminum phosphide (R,T) P007 2763-96-4 5-(Aminomethyl)-3-isoxazolol P008 504-24-5 4-Aminopyridine P009 131-74-8 Ammonium picrate (R) P119 7803-55-6 Ammonium vanadate P099 506-61-6 Argentate(1-), bis(cyano-C)-, potassium P010 7778-39-4 Arsenic acid H3 AsO4 P012 1327-53-3 Arsenic oxide As2 O3 P011 1303-28-2 Arsenic oxide As2 O5 P011 1303-28-2 Arsenic pentoxide P012 1327-53-3 Arsenic trioxide P038 692-42-2 Arsine, diethyl- P036 696-28-6 Arsonous dichloride, phenyl- P054 151-56-4 Aziridine P067 75-55-8 Aziridine, 2-methyl- P013 542-62-1 Barium cyanide P024 106-47-8 Benzenamine, 4-chloro- P077 100-01-6 Benzenamine, 4-nitro- P028 100-44-7 Benzene, (chloromethyl)- P042 51-43-4 1,2-Benzenediol, 4-[1-hydroxy-2-(methylamino)ethyl]-, (R)- P046 122-09-8 Benzeneethanamine, alpha,alpha-dimethyl- P014 108-98-5 Benzenethiol P127 1563-66-2 7-Benzofuranol, 2,3-dihydro-2,2-dimethyl-, methylcarbamate.
    [Show full text]