DOCSLIB.ORG

Application to the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission for Facility Permits

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Application to the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission for Facility Permits BURNS~ £DONNELL~ Application to the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission for Facility Permits Sweetland Wind Farm, LLC Sweetland Wind Farm Project Burns & McDonnell Project No. 103828 Final 3/6/2019 Application to the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission for Facility Permits Sweetland Wind Farm, LLC Sweetland Wind Farm Project Hand County, South Dakota Burns & McDonnell Project No. 103828 Final 3/6/2019 prepared by Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc. Centennial, Colorado COPYRIGHT © 2019 BURNS & McDONNELL ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. Application for Facility Permit Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY .......................................................... 2-1 2.1 Community Outreach and Land Acquisition ....................................................... 2-1 2.2 Summary of Agency Coordination ...................................................................... 2-2 2.3 County Permitting ................................................................................................ 2-3 2.4 Purchase and Off-take Agreements ..................................................................... 2-3 2.5 Environmental Analysis ....................................................................................... 2-3 2.6 Project Design ...................................................................................................... 2-4 3.0 FACILITY PERMIT APPLICATION ................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Relationship to NEPA .......................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Summary of Potential Impacts ............................................................................. 3-1 4.0 NAMES OF PARTICIPANTS (ARSD 20:10:22:06) .......................................... 4-1 5.0 NAME OF OWNER AND MANAGER (ARSD 20:10:22:07) ............................. 5-1 6.0 PURPOSE OF, AND DEMAND FOR, THE WIND ENERGY FACILITY (ARSD 20:10:22:08, 20:10:22:10) .................................................................... 6-1 6.1 Renewable Power Demand .................................................................................. 6-1 6.2 Wind Resources Areas ......................................................................................... 6-3 6.3 Consequences of Delay ........................................................................................ 6-5 7.0 ESTIMATED COST OF THE PROJECT (ARSD 20:10:22:09) ......................... 7-1 8.0 GENERAL SITE AND PROJECT COMPONENT DESCRIPTION (ARSD 20:10:22:11, 20:10:22:33:02, 20:10:22:34) ...................................................... 8-1 8.1 Site Location and Overview................................................................................. 8-1 8.2 Wind Farm Facility .............................................................................................. 8-1 8.2.1 Turbines ................................................................................................ 8-3 8.2.2 Access Roads and Crane Paths ............................................................. 8-5 8.2.3 O&M Facility ........................................................................................ 8-5 8.2.4 Meteorological Towers ......................................................................... 8-6 8.2.5 Project Electrical System ...................................................................... 8-6 8.2.6 Switchyard ............................................................................................ 8-8 8.2.7 Construction and Operations................................................................. 8-9 Sweetland Wind Farm, LLC TOC-1 Burns & McDonnell Application for Facility Permit Table of Contents 8.3 Transmission Facility ......................................................................................... 8-10 8.3.1 Transmission Right-of-Way................................................................ 8-10 8.3.2 Configuration of Pole and Conductors ............................................... 8-12 8.3.3 Construction and Operations............................................................... 8-13 8.4 Temporary Laydown Yard ................................................................................. 8-16 9.0 ALTERNATE SITES AND SITING CRITERIA (ARSD 20:10:22:12) ................ 9-1 9.1 General Project Location Selection ..................................................................... 9-1 9.2 Site Configuration Alternatives ........................................................................... 9-2 9.3 Lack of Reliance on Eminent Domain Powers .................................................... 9-4 10.0 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION (ARSD 20:10:22:13) ............................. 10-1 11.0 EFFECT ON PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT (ARSD 20:10:22:14) .................... 11-1 11.1 Geological Resources......................................................................................... 11-1 11.1.1 Existing Geological Resources ........................................................... 11-1 11.1.2 Geological Resources Impacts/Avoidance & Mitigation Measures ... 11-3 11.2 Soil Resources .................................................................................................... 11-4 11.2.1 Existing Soil Resources ...................................................................... 11-4 11.2.2 Soil Resources Impacts/Avoidance & Mitigation Measures .............. 11-8 12.0 EFFECT ON HYDROLOGY (ARSD 20:10:22:14, 20:10:22:15) ..................... 12-1 12.1 Groundwater Resources ..................................................................................... 12-1 12.1.1 Existing Groundwater Resources ........................................................ 12-1 12.1.2 Groundwater Resources Impacts/Avoidance & Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................. 12-2 12.2 Surface Water Resources ................................................................................... 12-3 12.2.1 Existing Surface Water Resources ...................................................... 12-3 12.2.2 Surface Water Resources Impacts/Avoidance & Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................. 12-4 12.3 Current and Planned Water Uses ....................................................................... 12-6 12.3.1 Current or Planned Water Use ............................................................ 12-6 12.3.2 Current or Planned Water Use Impacts/Avoidance & Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................. 12-6 13.0 EFFECT ON TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS (ARSD 20:10:22:16) .............. 13-1 13.1 Vegetation .......................................................................................................... 13-1 13.1.1 Existing Vegetation ............................................................................. 13-1 13.1.2 Vegetation Impacts/Avoidance & Mitigation Measures..................... 13-3 13.2 Wildlife .............................................................................................................. 13-5 13.2.1 Existing Wildlife ................................................................................. 13-5 13.2.2 Wildlife Impacts/Avoidance & Mitigation Measures ....................... 13-13 13.3 Wetlands and Waterbodies .............................................................................. 13-18 13.3.1 Existing Wetlands and Waterbodies ................................................. 13-18 Sweetland Wind Farm, LLC TOC-2 Burns & McDonnell Application for Facility Permit Table of Contents 13.3.2 Wetland and Waterbody Impacts/Avoidance & Mitigation Measures ........................................................................................... 13-19 14.0 EFFECT ON AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS (ARSD 20:10:22:17) ....................... 14-1 14.1 Existing Aquatic Ecosystems ............................................................................. 14-1 14.2 Aquatic Ecosystems Impacts/Avoidance & Mitigation Measures..................... 14-1 14.2.1 Wind Farm .......................................................................................... 14-1 14.2.2 Transmission Facility .......................................................................... 14-2 15.0 LAND USE (ARSD 20:10:22:18) .................................................................... 15-1 15.1 Land Use ............................................................................................................ 15-1 15.1.1 Existing Land Use ............................................................................... 15-1 15.1.2 Land Use Impacts/Avoidance & Mitigation Measures ....................... 15-2 15.2 Public Lands and Facilities ................................................................................ 15-4 15.2.1 Existing Public Lands and Facilities ................................................... 15-4 15.2.2 Public Lands and Facilities Impacts/Avoidance & Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................. 15-5 15.3 Sound ................................................................................................................. 15-5 15.3.1 Existing Sound ...................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Economic Development Benefits from Wind Energy in Nebraska: DE-AC36-08-GO28308 a Report for the Nebraska Energy Office (Revision) 5B
    Technical Report Economic Development Benefits NREL/TP-500-44344 from Wind Power in Nebraska: Revised June 2009 A Report for the Nebraska Energy Office E. Lantz Technical Report Economic Development Benefits NREL/TP-500-44344 from Wind Power in Nebraska: Revised June 2009 A Report for the Nebraska Energy Office E. Lantz Prepared under Task No. WER9.8501 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC Contract No. DE-AC36-08-GO28308 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. Available electronically at http://www.osti.gov/bridge Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy and its contractors, in paper, from: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Powering America FY07 Activities Summary
    Wind Powering America FY07 Activities Summary Dear Wind Powering America Colleague, We are pleased to present the Wind Powering America FY07 Activities Summary, which reflects the accomplishments of our state Wind Working Groups, our programs at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and our partner organizations. The national WPA team remains a leading force for moving wind energy forward in the United States. At the beginning of 2007, there were more than 11,500 megawatts (MW) of wind power installed across the United States, with an additional 4,000 MW projected in both 2007 and 2008. The American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) estimates that the U.S. installed capacity will exceed 16,000 MW by the end of 2007. When our partnership was launched in 2000, there were 2,500 MW of installed wind capacity in the United States. At that time, only four states had more than 100 MW of installed wind capacity. Seventeen states now have more than 100 MW installed. We anticipate five to six additional states will join the 100-MW club early in 2008, and by the end of the decade, more than 30 states will have passed the 100-MW milestone. WPA celebrates the 100-MW milestones because the first 100 megawatts are always the most difficult and lead to significant experience, recognition of the wind energy’s benefits, and expansion of the vision of a more economically and environmentally secure and sustainable future. WPA continues to work with its national, regional, and state partners to communicate the opportunities and benefits of wind energy to a diverse set of stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Energy Production: Legal Issues and Related Liability Concerns for Landowners
    Wind Energy Production: Legal Issues and Related Liability Concerns for Landowners 2321 N. Loop Drive, Ste 200 Ames, Iowa 50010 www.calt.iastate.edu Updated June 20, 2011 ‐ by Roger A. McEowen* Overview Current Emphasis On Wind-Generated Electricity Farmers have long used the wind. Beginning in the 1800’s, farmers in the United States installed In large part, the current push for wind- several million windmills across the Midwest generated electricity (and other forms of and Plains to pump water and (later) generate “renewable” energy) is based in power for lights and radios. Those windmills fit environmentalism.4 Concerns over the nicely into the existing landscape and generally environment began to be raised in the U.S. did not create problems for others. Today, during the 1960s and the 1970s. These concerns however, the wind energy industry is using the have had a profound impact on the political wind in a different manner by virtue of large- debate surrounding the belief by some in “global scale aerogenerators1 that have a tremendous climate change.”5 Proponents of wind energy impact on the visual landscape and the rural claim that wind generated electricity reduces culture.2 In some communities, wind energy emissions of carbon dioxide, which they claim development has raised issues between (contrary to a scientific study by the U.S. neighbors, between private landowners and wind National Academy of Sciences) is a significant energy development companies, and between contributor to “global warming.”6 local officials and development companies.3 Note: The National Research Council of Some farmers and other rural landowners have the National Academies concluded in a 2007 entered into long-term agreements with wind study that even under the most optimistic energy companies for the placement and conditions, the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • WHERE IS ELECTRIC GENERATION HEADED? Rodney Andrews, Phd
    WHERE IS ELECTRIC GENERATION HEADED? Rodney Andrews, PhD PE Director UK Center for Applied Energy Research The Annual Energy Outlook 2020 (January 29, 2020) 2 Key Takeaways from U.S. Energy Information Administration’s Annual Energy Outlook 2020 • The electricity generation mix continues to experience a rapid rate of change, with renewables the fastest‐growing source of electricity generation through 2050 because of continuing declines in the capital costs for solar and wind that are supported by federal tax credits and higher state‐level renewables targets. With slow load growth and increasing electricity production from renewables, U.S. coal‐fired and nuclear electricity generation declines; most of the decline occurs by the mid‐2020s. • The United States continues to produce historically high levels of crude oil and natural gas. Slow growth in domestic consumption of these fuels leads to increasing exports of crude oil, petroleum products, and liquefied natural gas. 3 Production grows faster than consumption with shift toward electrification Energy production (AEO2020 Reference case) Energy consumption by sector (AEO2020 Reference case) quadrillion British thermal units quadrillion British thermal units 2019 2019 50 50 history projections history projections dry natural gas 45 45 electric power 40 40 35 35 industrial 30 30 25 crude oil and lease 25 condensate transportation 20 other renewable energy 20 15 15 coal residential 10 natural gas plant 10 commercial liquids 5 nuclear 5 hydro 0 0 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 4 What is driving the energy markets nationally? • Future oil prices are highly uncertain and are subject to international market.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Transportation Planning for Future Renewable Energy Projects: Final Report (FHWA 0-6850-1)
    TECHNICAL REPORT 0-6850-1 TXDOT PROJECT NUMBER 0-6850 Texas Transportation Planning for Future Renewable Energy Projects: Final Report Sebastian Astroza Priyadarshan N. Patil Katherine I. Smith Vivek Kumar Chandra R. Bhat Zhanmin Zhang August 2016; Published March 2017 http://library.ctr.utexas.edu/ctr-publications/0-6850-1.pdf Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA/TX-16/0-6850-1 Accession No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Texas Transportation Planning for Future Renewable Energy August 2016; Published March 2017 Projects: Final Report 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Sebastian Astroza, Priyadarshan N. Patil, Katherine I. Smith, 0-6850-1 Vivek Kumar, Chandra R. Bhat, Zhanmin Zhang 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Transportation Research 11. Contract or Grant No. The University of Texas at Austin 0-6850 1616 Guadalupe Street, Suite 4.202 Austin, TX 78701 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Technical Report Research and Technology Implementation Office January 2015–August 2016 P.O. Box 5080 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Austin, TX 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Project performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation. 16. Abstract There will be a significant increase in the number of renewable energy production facilities in Texas. The construction of wind farms requires the transport of wind turbine components that create increased loads on rural roads and bridges. These rural roads and bridges are typically not designed for such loads.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning for Wind Energy
    Planning for Wind Energy Suzanne Rynne, AICP , Larry Flowers, Eric Lantz, and Erica Heller, AICP , Editors American Planning Association Planning Advisory Service Report Number 566 Planning for Wind Energy is the result of a collaborative part- search intern at APA; Kirstin Kuenzi is a research intern at nership among the American Planning Association (APA), APA; Joe MacDonald, aicp, was program development se- the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), the nior associate at APA; Ann F. Dillemuth, aicp, is a research American Wind Energy Association (AWEA), and Clarion associate and co-editor of PAS Memo at APA. Associates. Funding was provided by the U.S. Department The authors thank the many other individuals who con- of Energy under award number DE-EE0000717, as part of tributed to or supported this project, particularly the plan- the 20% Wind by 2030: Overcoming the Challenges funding ners, elected officials, and other stakeholders from case- opportunity. study communities who participated in interviews, shared The report was developed under the auspices of the Green documents and images, and reviewed drafts of the case Communities Research Center, one of APA’s National studies. Special thanks also goes to the project partners Centers for Planning. The Center engages in research, policy, who reviewed the entire report and provided thoughtful outreach, and education that advance green communities edits and comments, as well as the scoping symposium through planning. For more information, visit www.plan- participants who worked with APA and project partners to ning.org/nationalcenters/green/index.htm. APA’s National develop the outline for the report: James Andrews, utilities Centers for Planning conduct policy-relevant research and specialist at the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission; education involving community health, natural and man- Jennifer Banks, offshore wind and siting specialist at AWEA; made hazards, and green communities.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Offshore Wind Power Economic Impact Assessment
    U.S. Offshore Wind Power Economic Impact Assessment Issue Date | March 2020 Prepared By American Wind Energy Association Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Current Status of U.S. Offshore Wind .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Lessons from Land-based Wind ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Announced Investments in Domestic Infrastructure ............................................................................................................................ 5 Methodology ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Input Assumptions ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Modeling Tool ........................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Clean Energy Economy
    JUNE 2009 The Pew Charitable Trusts applies the power of knowledge to solve today’s most challenging problems. Our Pew Center on the States identifies and advances effective policy approaches to critical issues facing states, and our Pew Environment Group promotes practical, meaningful solutions to some of the world’s most pressing environmental problems. PEW CENTER ON THE STATES PEW ENVIRONMENT GROUP Susan Urahn, managing director Joshua Reichert, managing director Project Team Kevin Curtis Kil Huh Brendan Hill Phyllis Cuttino Lori Grange Jeannette Lam Laura Lightbody E. Brooks Riley Michele Mariani Vaughn Shannon Heyck-Williams Jill Antonishak Melissa Maynard Jane Breakell Carla Uriona, design Sean Greene Research Consultants: Collaborative Economics, Inc. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report benefited tremendously from the insights and expertise of an advisory panel and two additional external reviewers. These experts provided feedback and guidance at critical stages in the project. While they have screened the report for accuracy, neither they nor their organizations necessarily endorse its findings or conclusions. Advisory Panel: Marilyn Brown, professor, School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology; Doug Cameron, managing director and chief science advisor, Piper Jaffray; Joe Cortright, vice president and principal, Impresa; Jeff Finkle, CEcD, president and CEO, International Economic Development Council; Tim Woodward, managing director, Nth Power; and Joel S. Yudken, PhD, principal, High Road Strategies, LLC. External Reviewers: Mark Z. Jacobson, professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering and director, Atmosphere/Energy Program, Stanford University; and Joe Fargione, Lead Scientist, North America Region, The Nature Conservancy. We would like to thank our Pew colleagues—Andrew McDonald, Brandon MacGillis, Kymberly Escobar, Lisa Cutler, Janet Lane, Alyson Freedman and Jessica Riordan—for their assistance with communications and dissemination.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Powering America Fy08 Activities Summary
    WIND POWERING AMERICA FY08 ACTIVITIES SUMMARY Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Dear Wind Powering America Colleague, We are pleased to present the Wind Powering America FY08 Activities Summary, which reflects the accomplishments of our state Wind Working Groups, our programs at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and our partner organizations. The national WPA team remains a leading force for moving wind energy forward in the United States. At the beginning of 2008, there were more than 16,500 megawatts (MW) of wind power installed across the United States, with an additional 7,000 MW projected by year end, bringing the U.S. installed capacity to more than 23,000 MW by the end of 2008. When our partnership was launched in 2000, there were 2,500 MW of installed wind capacity in the United States. At that time, only four states had more than 100 MW of installed wind capacity. Twenty-two states now have more than 100 MW installed, compared to 17 at the end of 2007. We anticipate that four or five additional states will join the 100-MW club in 2009, and by the end of the decade, more than 30 states will have passed the 100-MW milestone. WPA celebrates the 100-MW milestones because the first 100 megawatts are always the most difficult and lead to significant experience, recognition of the wind energy’s benefits, and expansion of the vision of a more economically and environmentally secure and sustainable future. Of course, the 20% Wind Energy by 2030 report (developed by AWEA, the U.S. Department of Energy, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and other stakeholders) indicates that 44 states may be in the 100-MW club by 2030, and 33 states will have more than 1,000 MW installed (at the end of 2008, there were six states in that category).
    [Show full text]
  • A Feasibility Study for Transitioning Louisville, Kentucky's
    a Feasibility Study for Transitioning Louisville, Kentucky’s Transportation and Electricity Generation to Renewable Sources The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Darst, Timothy. 2016. a Feasibility Study for Transitioning Louisville, Kentucky’s Transportation and Electricity Generation to Renewable Sources. Master's thesis, Harvard Extension School. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33797349 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA A Feasibility Study for Transitioning Louisville, Kentucky’s Transportation and Electricity Generation to Renewable Sources Timothy J. Darst A Thesis in the Field of Sustainability and Environmental Management for the Degree of Liberal Arts in Extension Studies Harvard University May 2016 © 2016 Timothy J. Darst. Abstract Climate change is caused mainly by humans and there is a great risk of “severe, pervasive and irreversible impacts for people and ecosystems” (IPCC, 2014). It has been proposed by many that America can address climate change by simply buying electric cars and then obtaining all electricity from renewable sources (Deutch, & Moniz, 2010; Freeman & Parks, 2016). This “silver bullet” is appealing; however, without detailed study it is not known whether this is a viable solution in many communities across the United States. Louisville, Kentucky was chosen as a case study to determine if it is feasible for conversion to a 100%-renewably-sourced electricity grid and all-electric transportation model.
    [Show full text]
  • Application for a Large Wind Energy Conversion System Site Permit
    Application for A Large Wind Energy Conversion System Site Permit Walleye Wind, LLC Rock County, Minnesota MN PUC Docket Number: IP7026/WS-20-384 Amendment Submittal November 3, 2020 CONTENTS TABLES ....................................................................................................................................... vii FIGURES ...................................................................................................................................... ix MAPS x APPENDICES .............................................................................................................................. xi ACRONYM/TERM DEFINITIONS ......................................................................................... xii MINNESOTA RULE COMPLIANCE .................................................................................. xviii 1.0 APPLICANT INFORMATION ...................................................................................... 1 1.1 Letter of transmittal signed by an authorized representative or agent of the applicant. .... 2 1.2 Complete name, address, and telephone number of the applicant and any authorized representative. The authorized representatives for the Applicant are: ....................................... 2 1.3 Signature of the preparer of the application if prepared by an agent or consultant of the applicant. .................................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Role of the applicant in the construction
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia Offshore Energy Development Law and Policy Review and Recommendations
    E N V I R O N M E N T A L L A W I N S T I T U T E Virginia Offshore Energy Development Law and Policy Review and Recommendations Prepared by Environmental Law Institute® for the Virginia Coastal Zone Management Program December 2008 VIRGINIA OFFSHORE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT LAW AND POLICY REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS Prepared by Environmental Law Institute for the Virginia Coastal Zone Management Program #NA07NOS4190178 #NA06NOS4190241 December 22, 2008 Table of Contents I. Introduction……………………………………………………………...1 Virginia Energy Policies and Legislation……………………………………....1 Summary of Results……………………………………………………………..3 II. Offshore Energy Development & Impacts………………………........4 Natural Gas/Oil Development on the OCS…………………………………….4 Offshore Wind Energy Facilities…………………………………………….....6 Offshore Wave Energy Facilities……………………………………………...14 III. Federal Jurisdiction………………………………………,…………21 IV. State Laws Relevant to Offshore Energy Spatial Location……......31 Massachusetts Oceans Act of 2008…………………………………………….31 California: Ocean Protection Act and Marine Life Protection Act…………34 Rhode Island: Ocean Special Area Management Plan……………………….38 Oregon: Territorial Sea Plan.……..…………………………………………...41 Other States……………………………………………………………………..43 V. State Regulatory Laws Related to Offshore Energy Projects………45 Massachusetts…………………………………………………………………..45 North Carolina………………………………………………………………….51 Delaware...………………………………………………………………………56 Texas…………………………………………………………………………….60 Oregon…………………………………………………………………………...62 Washington……...………………………………………………………………66 VI. Virginia
    [Show full text]