DOCSLIB.ORG

A Feasibility Study for Transitioning Louisville, Kentucky's

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Feasibility Study for Transitioning Louisville, Kentucky's a Feasibility Study for Transitioning Louisville, Kentucky’s Transportation and Electricity Generation to Renewable Sources The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Darst, Timothy. 2016. a Feasibility Study for Transitioning Louisville, Kentucky’s Transportation and Electricity Generation to Renewable Sources. Master's thesis, Harvard Extension School. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33797349 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA A Feasibility Study for Transitioning Louisville, Kentucky’s Transportation and Electricity Generation to Renewable Sources Timothy J. Darst A Thesis in the Field of Sustainability and Environmental Management for the Degree of Liberal Arts in Extension Studies Harvard University May 2016 © 2016 Timothy J. Darst. Abstract Climate change is caused mainly by humans and there is a great risk of “severe, pervasive and irreversible impacts for people and ecosystems” (IPCC, 2014). It has been proposed by many that America can address climate change by simply buying electric cars and then obtaining all electricity from renewable sources (Deutch, & Moniz, 2010; Freeman & Parks, 2016). This “silver bullet” is appealing; however, without detailed study it is not known whether this is a viable solution in many communities across the United States. Louisville, Kentucky was chosen as a case study to determine if it is feasible for conversion to a 100%-renewably-sourced electricity grid and all-electric transportation model. Louisville is in one of the largest coal producing states, is heavily dependent on coal for electricity production, and has a high per capita number of vehicle miles driven annually. In this study the amount of energy needed to power all of the city’s vehicles using electricity was measured, and the amount of electricity that the community would be able to produce from renewable energy sources was estimated. The results indicate that while still monumental in cost and scope, it is possible to convert Louisville’s electricity grid to 100% renewable energy while replacing all of its vehicles with electric vehicles by 2050. To reduce the cost and magnitude of this conversion, conservation and efficiency measures are needed that result in a 26.5% decrease in electricity and a 15.6% reduction in transportation by 2050. Hydroelectricity, wind energy, electricity produced from biomass, and energy storage can meet nighttime base load demand and provide the dispatchability needed for grid stability. After conservation and efficiency and producing energy from other renewable sources, this conversion would require more than 48 million solar panels, enough to cover 36.5 square miles or 9.1% of the city. A transformation of this magnitude will require a large commitment from the community and full participation of the governmental, business, and non-profit sectors. Acknowledgements Many thanks to those who helped me along the way in my research and writing, listed here alphabetically, Stacy Bogan, Junior GIS Specialist at the Harvard Center for Geographic Analysis for help in learning to work with GIS data, Dr. Kate Bulinski, Associate Professor of Geoscience at Bellarmine University’s School of Environmental Studies, for taking on the difficult task of being my thesis director, Andrea Chaves, business technology analyst at Deloitte Consulting LLP in Denver for help with the LiDAR data and ArcGIS programs, George Clark, research librarian at Harvard’s Lamont Library for help in researching and finding documents, Sarah Lynn Cunningham, Executive Director of the Louisville Climate Action Network for technical consulting, Susan Dresley, librarian at the U. S. Department of Transportation Volpe Library for her help in finding sources, Philip Gerstein, librarian at the Harvard University Godfrey Lowell Cabot Library for assisting me in research, Geoffrey Hobin, Capital Program Administrator for the Transit Authority of River City for help with finding transit data, Matthew Jolly, for his work using GIS and LiDAR data, Lori Kelsey, transportation planner at KIPDA for her help in finding census data, Mark Leighton, Harvard University’s Extension School for advising me for this thesis, my wife Angela Lincoln, for being patient with me and being understanding about the many hours of work that was needed for this research, Doc Manning ,for help in understanding the complexities of electricity production, Randy Simon, transportation planner at KIPDA for help in v locating data, Elizabeth Youngblood, for pointing me to sources about solar energy, and Barry Zalph, for proofing and giving me advice on research. vi Table of Contents Acknowledgements v List of Tables xii List of Figures xiii Definition of Terms xiv I. Introduction 1 Research Significance and Objectives 1 Background 2 Base Load and Peaks: Balancing Demand and Supply 7 Ramping 10 Surplus Energy 12 EV Charging 13 Operating Reserves and Storage 18 Limitations for Renewable Energy Production 19 Capacity Factor 22 Local Sources 23 Louisville, Kentucky 24 Research Questions and Hypotheses 27 II. Methods 30 Transportation 30 Increase in Demand from Electric Vehicles 31 Conversion of the Existing Grid to Solar 32 vii Population and Growth 33 Conservation and Energy Efficiency 33 Other Renewable Energy Sources 34 Bioenergy 34 Wind and hydroelectricity 35 Land Usage for Solar Panels 35 Storage Capacity of Electric Vehicles 36 III. Results 37 Transportation 37 Increase in Demand from Electric Vehicles 38 Conversion of the Existing Grid to Solar 39 Population and Growth 40 Conservation and Energy Efficiency 41 Other Renewable Energy Sources 42 Land Usage for Solar Panels 44 Storage Capacity of Electric Vehicles 47 IV. Discussion 49 Increase in Demand from Electric Vehicles 49 Solar Conversion Grid to Solar 50 Efficiency and Conservation 53 Buildings 53 Lighting 54 Appliances 55 viii Heat pumps 56 Observer effect and feedback loops 57 Other conservation and efficiency solutions 59 Transportation 61 Other Renewable Energy Sources 66 Bioenergy 66 Dedicated crops 68 Urban wood waste 69 Lumber mill waste 69 Industrial, commercial, and institutional food waste 70 Manure 71 Agricultural residues 72 Sewage 72 Landfill gas (LFG) 72 Geothermal 74 Hydroelectric 75 Wind 77 Energy Storage 77 Batteries in EVs (V2G) 79 Batteries in Homes 80 Pumped Storage in Hydroelectric Reservoirs 84 Utility Scale Battery Storage 86 Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) 87 ix Capacitors and Other Short-term Storage Devices 89 Flywheel Energy Storage (FES) 91 Other Strategies 93 Smart Grid 93 Demand Response 94 Mitigating Curtailment 97 Flattening the Duck Curve 98 Recommendations 99 Government Sector 99 Business Sector 100 Non-profit Sector 103 Policy Issues 105 Portfolio standards 105 Feed-in tariff 106 Building codes 106 Financing mechanisms 106 Net-metering expansion 107 Land use regulations 107 Conclusion 108 References 110 x List of Tables Table 1 LG&E power plants and production 26 Table 2 Electric vehicles weighted average kWh per mile 38 Table 3 Solar electricity demand based on current levels of usage 40 Table 4 Calculation of weighted average energy efficiency savings, Louisville, Kentucky 41 Table 5 Solar electricity demand after employing conservation or efficiency in buildings and the transportation 42 Table 6 Electricity generation potential from renewable energy sources other than solar 43 Table 7 Solar electricity demand after employing other renewable energy sources 44 Table 8 Largest parking lots in Louisville, Kentucky 45 Table 9 Electric vehicles weighted average battery capacity 47 Table 10 Biomass generation from dedicated corps of switchgrass and trees 69 Table 11 2012 census of cattle, calves, hogs, pigs, and poultry in vicinity of Louisville, Kentucky 71 Table 12 Bioenergy resources Louisville, Kentucky and surrounding counties 73 Table 13 Summary of potential new hydropower resources in Region 5 75 Table 14 Comparison of battery technologies 84 xi List of Figures Fig. 1 How to cut U. S. global warming emissions in half 5 Fig. 2 Sources of greenhouse gas emissions 6 Fig. 3 Hourly electricity demand 8 Fig. 4 Illustrative daily load in 2020 11 Fig. 5 Potential transformer overloading due to L2 EV charging 15 Fig. 6 Shape and transition of fixed hourly aggregate load profile for PEVs 16 Fig. 7 Artist depiction of solar array along highway as proposed for I-264 near the Dixie highway interchange 46 Fig. 8 Average household electricity savings by feedback type 59 Fig. 9 Boulder, Colorado cumulative investment in alternative transportation infrastructure compared with increases in mode share. 63 Fig. 10 Potential new hydropower capacity in Region 5 76 Fig. 11 Capacity of U.S. grid storage projects 78 Fig. 12 Comparison of environmental impacts of five EV batteries using LCA 82 Fig. 13 Pumped storage hydro 85 Fig. 14 Isothermal compression diagram 87 Fig. 15 Schematic of the PowerSouth Energy Cooperative compressed air energy storage facility in McIntosh, Alabama 89 Fig. 16 Flywheel diagram 91 Fig. 17 Comparison of storage devices 92 xii Definition of Terms Base load: Utilities use certain sources of electricity to provide a consistent level of electricity that does not fluctuate throughout the day or night. This minimum amount of electricity is necessary to meet the basic electricity demand of the customers. This demand is called the base load. Bioenergy: Energy produced from plants, such as the electricity and or heat from burning wood, or the energy produced from burning ethanol, or the heat or electricity produced from burning landfill gas. Efficiency: For the purposes of this research, efficiency is the reduction in use of electricity that is achieved by a change in the technology to perform the same task while using less energy. An example of this would be changing to a car that has greater miles per gallon (MPG) or miles per gallon equivalent (MPGe).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2010-IFEA-Festival-And-Event-Entry-Louisville-KY-SECTION-4-3-Listofsuppliersforf-E.Pdf
    ACCOUNTING FIRMS BKD LLP 220 W. Main St. #1700 Louisville, KY 40201 502-581-0435 Deming, Malone, Livesay, and Ostroff 9300 Shelbyville Rd Ste. 1100 Louisville, KY 40222 502-426-9660 Henderman, Jessee & Company, PLLC 304 Whttington Pkwy Ste. 107 Louisville, KY 40222 502-425-4800 Louis T. Roth & Co., PLLC Certified Public Accountants 2100 Gardiner Ln, Ste 207 Louisville, KY 40205 502-459-8100 Strothman & Company Psc 1600 Waterfront Plaza 325 W. Main St. Louisville, KY 40202 502-585-1600 ADVERTISING – PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS Boden Co. Advertising 611 Indian Ridge Rd. Louisville, KY 40207 502-893-2497 Alan Hyman Enterprises, Inc. 9 Eastover Ct. Louisville, KY 40206 502-896-2858 B & W Specialty House Inc. 7321 New LaGrange Rd Ste. 100 Louisville, KY 40222 502-425-4444 Clubhouse Promotions PO Box 436102 Louisville, KY 40243 502-267-6880 Hammond Marketing Inc. 4602 Southern Pkwy Louisville , KY 40214 502-361-0707 Ink Productions Inc.--Screenprinting & Embroidery 1807R Cargo Ct Louisville, KY 40299 502-267-1825 www.inkproductions.com Mackey Printing Services 5000 Olde Creek Way Prospect, KY 40059 502-292-0000 MPC Promotions 4300 Produce Rd Louisville, KY 40218 502-451-4900 Prescence Incorporated 2311 Mohican Hill Ct. Louisville, KY 40207 502-365-4616 Print Tex USA 11198 Ampere Ct Louisville, KY 40299 502-267-1825 Proforma double dog dare 3204 Creekwood Ct. New Albany, IN 47150 812-944-8322 www.proforma.com/doubledogdare Prosperity Promotions 12308 Aiken Rd Ste. 10 Louisville, KY 40223 502-245-2309 Quite an Impression 7209 Deer Ridge Rd. Prospect, KY 40059 502-645-5675 The Source 414 Baxter Ave Louisville, KY 40204 502-241-8888 ADVERTISING / PR FIRMS Bandy Carroll Hellige 307 W.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Energy Production: Legal Issues and Related Liability Concerns for Landowners
    Wind Energy Production: Legal Issues and Related Liability Concerns for Landowners 2321 N. Loop Drive, Ste 200 Ames, Iowa 50010 www.calt.iastate.edu Updated June 20, 2011 ‐ by Roger A. McEowen* Overview Current Emphasis On Wind-Generated Electricity Farmers have long used the wind. Beginning in the 1800’s, farmers in the United States installed In large part, the current push for wind- several million windmills across the Midwest generated electricity (and other forms of and Plains to pump water and (later) generate “renewable” energy) is based in power for lights and radios. Those windmills fit environmentalism.4 Concerns over the nicely into the existing landscape and generally environment began to be raised in the U.S. did not create problems for others. Today, during the 1960s and the 1970s. These concerns however, the wind energy industry is using the have had a profound impact on the political wind in a different manner by virtue of large- debate surrounding the belief by some in “global scale aerogenerators1 that have a tremendous climate change.”5 Proponents of wind energy impact on the visual landscape and the rural claim that wind generated electricity reduces culture.2 In some communities, wind energy emissions of carbon dioxide, which they claim development has raised issues between (contrary to a scientific study by the U.S. neighbors, between private landowners and wind National Academy of Sciences) is a significant energy development companies, and between contributor to “global warming.”6 local officials and development companies.3 Note: The National Research Council of Some farmers and other rural landowners have the National Academies concluded in a 2007 entered into long-term agreements with wind study that even under the most optimistic energy companies for the placement and conditions, the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • WHERE IS ELECTRIC GENERATION HEADED? Rodney Andrews, Phd
    WHERE IS ELECTRIC GENERATION HEADED? Rodney Andrews, PhD PE Director UK Center for Applied Energy Research The Annual Energy Outlook 2020 (January 29, 2020) 2 Key Takeaways from U.S. Energy Information Administration’s Annual Energy Outlook 2020 • The electricity generation mix continues to experience a rapid rate of change, with renewables the fastest‐growing source of electricity generation through 2050 because of continuing declines in the capital costs for solar and wind that are supported by federal tax credits and higher state‐level renewables targets. With slow load growth and increasing electricity production from renewables, U.S. coal‐fired and nuclear electricity generation declines; most of the decline occurs by the mid‐2020s. • The United States continues to produce historically high levels of crude oil and natural gas. Slow growth in domestic consumption of these fuels leads to increasing exports of crude oil, petroleum products, and liquefied natural gas. 3 Production grows faster than consumption with shift toward electrification Energy production (AEO2020 Reference case) Energy consumption by sector (AEO2020 Reference case) quadrillion British thermal units quadrillion British thermal units 2019 2019 50 50 history projections history projections dry natural gas 45 45 electric power 40 40 35 35 industrial 30 30 25 crude oil and lease 25 condensate transportation 20 other renewable energy 20 15 15 coal residential 10 natural gas plant 10 commercial liquids 5 nuclear 5 hydro 0 0 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 4 What is driving the energy markets nationally? • Future oil prices are highly uncertain and are subject to international market.
    [Show full text]
  • PROJECT DATE INVESTMENT ADDRESS Project Development Omni Louisville $300,000,000 400 S
    DRAFT - DEVELOPMENT 2014-2020 Announced, Completed, Under Construction - December 2020 PROJECT DATE INVESTMENT ADDRESS Project Development Omni Louisville $300,000,000 400 S. 2nd Street Churchill Downs Racetrack hotel and racing machine venue $300,000,000 700 Central Ave One Park $250,000,000 2300 Lexington Road UPS Worldport hangar $220,000,000 Kentucky International Convention Center $207,000,000 221 S. 4th Street Soccer stadium development $200,000,000 Butchertown UofL ShelbyHurst campus $189,000,000 Whittington Pkwy Norton Healthcare expansion 2020 $167,000,000 4960 Norton Healthcare Blvd. Norton Audubon Hospital $107,000,000 1 Audubon Plaza Drive Louisville International Aiport Phase 2 $100,000,000 Louisville International Airport Sheppard Square $100,000,000 526 E. Lampton Street Hurstbourne Town Center $100,000,000 101 Whittington Parkway Providence Point apartments Aug-20 $81,000,000 2020 Herr Lane Moxy/Distil hotels $80,000,000 101 W. Main Street Embassy Suites $85,000,000 501 S. 4th Street UofL Belknap Academic buidling $80,000,000 Belknap campus UofL Instructional Building $80,000,000 500 S. Preston Street GE Appliances new dishwasher line Dec-20 $80,000,000 Appliance Park 422 e-Main project Nov-20 $80,000,000 418 E. Main St. and 431 E. Market St. Galt House renovations $80,000,000 140 N. Fourth Street South Pointe Commons $80,000,000 Bardstown and Gene Snyder Norton Children's Hospital $78,300,000 231 E. Chestnut Street Riverport Landings $70,000,000 4646 Cane Run Road Riverpark Place $65,000,000 1600 River Shore Drive Cardinal Stadium $63,000,000 2800 S.
    [Show full text]
  • Clean Energy Economy
    JUNE 2009 The Pew Charitable Trusts applies the power of knowledge to solve today’s most challenging problems. Our Pew Center on the States identifies and advances effective policy approaches to critical issues facing states, and our Pew Environment Group promotes practical, meaningful solutions to some of the world’s most pressing environmental problems. PEW CENTER ON THE STATES PEW ENVIRONMENT GROUP Susan Urahn, managing director Joshua Reichert, managing director Project Team Kevin Curtis Kil Huh Brendan Hill Phyllis Cuttino Lori Grange Jeannette Lam Laura Lightbody E. Brooks Riley Michele Mariani Vaughn Shannon Heyck-Williams Jill Antonishak Melissa Maynard Jane Breakell Carla Uriona, design Sean Greene Research Consultants: Collaborative Economics, Inc. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report benefited tremendously from the insights and expertise of an advisory panel and two additional external reviewers. These experts provided feedback and guidance at critical stages in the project. While they have screened the report for accuracy, neither they nor their organizations necessarily endorse its findings or conclusions. Advisory Panel: Marilyn Brown, professor, School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology; Doug Cameron, managing director and chief science advisor, Piper Jaffray; Joe Cortright, vice president and principal, Impresa; Jeff Finkle, CEcD, president and CEO, International Economic Development Council; Tim Woodward, managing director, Nth Power; and Joel S. Yudken, PhD, principal, High Road Strategies, LLC. External Reviewers: Mark Z. Jacobson, professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering and director, Atmosphere/Energy Program, Stanford University; and Joe Fargione, Lead Scientist, North America Region, The Nature Conservancy. We would like to thank our Pew colleagues—Andrew McDonald, Brandon MacGillis, Kymberly Escobar, Lisa Cutler, Janet Lane, Alyson Freedman and Jessica Riordan—for their assistance with communications and dissemination.
    [Show full text]
  • PROJECT DATE INVESTMENT ADDRESS Project Development Omni Louisville $300,000,000 400 S
    DEVELOPMENT 2014 - MAY 2021 Announced, completed or underway PROJECT DATE INVESTMENT ADDRESS Project Development Omni Louisville $300,000,000 400 S. 2nd Street One Park $250,000,000 2300 Lexington Road UPS Worldport hangar $220,000,000 Kentucky International Convention Center $207,000,000 221 S. 4th Street Soccer stadium development $200,000,000 Butchertown UofL ShelbyHurst campus $189,000,000 Whittington Pkwy Norton Healthcare expansion 2020 $167,000,000 4960 Norton Healthcare Blvd. Norton Audubon Hospital $107,000,000 1 Audubon Plaza Drive Louisville International Aiport Phase 2 $100,000,000 Louisville International Airport Sheppard Square $100,000,000 526 E. Lampton Street Hurstbourne Town Center $100,000,000 101 Whittington Parkway UofL freshman dorms Mar-21 $87,000,000 Providence Point apartments Aug-20 $81,000,000 2020 Herr Lane Moxy/Distil hotels $80,000,000 101 W. Main Street Embassy Suites $85,000,000 501 S. 4th Street UofL Belknap Academic buidling $80,000,000 Belknap campus UofL Instructional Building $80,000,000 500 S. Preston Street GE Appliances new dishwasher line Dec-20 $80,000,000 Appliance Park 422 e-Main project Nov-20 $80,000,000 418 E. Main St. and 431 E. Market St. Galt House renovations $80,000,000 140 N. Fourth Street South Pointe Commons $80,000,000 Bardstown and Gene Snyder Norton Children's Hospital $78,300,000 231 E. Chestnut Street Lyric at Norton Commons Mar-21 $78,000,000 St. Bernadette Avenue and Peppermint Street Riverport Landings $74,000,000 4646 Cane Run Road Riverpark Place $65,000,000 1600 River Shore Drive Cardinal Stadium $63,000,000 2800 S.
    [Show full text]
  • Application for a Large Wind Energy Conversion System Site Permit
    Application for A Large Wind Energy Conversion System Site Permit Walleye Wind, LLC Rock County, Minnesota MN PUC Docket Number: IP7026/WS-20-384 Amendment Submittal November 3, 2020 CONTENTS TABLES ....................................................................................................................................... vii FIGURES ...................................................................................................................................... ix MAPS x APPENDICES .............................................................................................................................. xi ACRONYM/TERM DEFINITIONS ......................................................................................... xii MINNESOTA RULE COMPLIANCE .................................................................................. xviii 1.0 APPLICANT INFORMATION ...................................................................................... 1 1.1 Letter of transmittal signed by an authorized representative or agent of the applicant. .... 2 1.2 Complete name, address, and telephone number of the applicant and any authorized representative. The authorized representatives for the Applicant are: ....................................... 2 1.3 Signature of the preparer of the application if prepared by an agent or consultant of the applicant. .................................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Role of the applicant in the construction
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Power Manufacturing Opportunities in Kentucky
    Wind Power Manufacturing Opportunities in Kentucky May 1, 2012 Jeff Anthony American Wind Energy Association American Wind Energy Association AWEA is the non-profit, national trade association for the U.S. wind energy industry » AWEA was established in 1974 » Over 2,000 companies are business members » AWEA represents the entire industry from small component manufacturers to developers to transportation companies to service firms to electric utilities » Industry employees 75,000 » Convenes conferences and workshops to educate the public and bring industry members together, including one of the fastest growing Conference & Exhibitions in the U.S., WINDPOWER www.awea.org www.windpowerexpo.org 2 Market Overview Global Growth In Wind Power » 238,351 MW of wind installed globally » The global industry grew 21% in 2011 » The U.S. represented 15.5% of the total 2011 market for new wind. Data Sources: AWEA, GWEC U.S. Annual and Cumulative Wind Power Capacity (in MW) Wind Projects Installations » There were 6,816 MW of wind projects installed in the U.S. through the fourth quarter of 2011, a 30% increase over new installations in 2010. » Total U.S. wind installations stand at 46,916 MW, with annual growth of 17% in 2011. » 5-year average annual growth of 35% for the U.S. wind industry. » Invested up to $20 billion annually Source: AWEA U.S. Wind Industry Annual Market Report Year Ending 2011 Wind Power has captured 35% of all new generating capacity in America since 2007 • New wind capacity represented Percent of New Installed Capacity (in MW), 31% of all new capacity installed in 2007-2011 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Proceedings
    Meeting Proceedings Published May 2021 Prepared by Susan Savitt Schwartz American Wind Wildlife Institute 1990 K Street NW, Suite 620 Washington, DC 20006 awwi.org Acknowledgments The meeting and agenda for the 13th Wind Wildlife Research Meeting were planned by the American Wind Wildlife Institute (AWWI). Production of the Proceedings was co-funded by AWWI and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory for the U.S. Department of Energy. AWWI wishes to acknowledge and thank the following companies, organizations, and individuals for their support for the meeting: Platinum Sponsors: DNV • National Renewable Energy Laboratory • Western EcoSystems Technology (WEST), Inc. Gold Sponsors: Bureau Waardenburg • Clearway Energy Group Silver Sponsors: Atwell, LLC • Burns & McDonnell • NextEra Energy Resources • Olsson Bronze Sponsors: Blanton & Associates • Copperhead Environmental Consulting, Inc. Energy Renewal Partners • Locke Lord LLP • Nossaman LLP • Natural Resource Solutions, Inc. • Tetra Tech Members of the Planning Committee, who contributed extensive volunteer hours in planning this meeting, as well as all others who provided input: Amanda Hale, Texas Christian University • Amy Parsons, Avangrid Renewables • Brad Romano, Invenergy • Christi Calabrese, EDP Renewables • Cris Hein, National Renewable Energy Laboratory • Dale Strickland, Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc. • Danna Small, Pattern Energy Group • Dave Nelson, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science • Dave Phillips, Equinor • David Tidhar, Natural Power • Doug Johnson, U.S. Geological Survey • Garry George, National Audubon Society • Hein Prinsen, Bureau Waardenburg • Janine Crane, NextEra Energy • Jay Diffendorfer, U.S. Geological Survey • Jenni Dean, Enel Green Power • Jocelyn Brown-Saracino, U.S. Department of Energy • Joy Page, Defenders of Wildlife • Kate Williams, Biodiversity Research Institute • Katie Umekubo, Natural Resources Defense Council • Kelley Myers, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practices in Wind Energy Options, Easements, and Leases
    BEST PRACTICES IN WIND ENERGY OPTIONS, EASEMENTS, AND LEASES Joseph F. Spitzzeri – [email protected] Nicholas R. Lykins – [email protected] Johnson & Bell, Ltd. SECTION 1—POLITICAL/SOCIAL ATTITUDES Concern about global climate change and continued uncertainty about the future costs and liabilities of natural gas and coal facilities has helped spur the current political and social attitudes towards the use of renewable energy sources. State and local governments are competing to attract wind industry developments to their community to create jobs and improve the tax base, not to mention to further the “green” movement. The Federal Production Tax Credit enables utilities, wind energy developers and manufacturers to invest billions of dollars each year in equipment and facilities associated with the generation of electricity from renewable energy resources such as wind, geothermal, biomass and hydropower. The current value of the credit is 2 cents/kilowatt-hour (kWh) of electricity produced. The credit applies to electricity produced by a qualified wind facility placed in service after December 31, 1992 and before January 1, 2010 as the credit was recently extended to December 31, 2009. It applies only to applicable utility-scale wind turbines, not smaller turbines used to power individual homes or businesses. States have adopted Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) to both encourage and require the use of renewable energy in their states. In 2007, Illinois adopted one of the more aggressive RPS in the country, requiring 75% of all renewable energy to be wind power renewable energy, if available. Illinois is currently 8 th in the United States among wind generating capacity states.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy from the Wind Student Guide
    2012-2013 Energy From the Wind Student Guide INTERMEDIATE Introduction to Wind Wind Average Wind Speed at 80 Meters Wind is moving air. You cannot see air, but it is all around you. You cannot see the wind, but you know it is there. You hear leaves rustling in the trees. You see clouds moving across the sky. You feel cool breezes on your skin. You witness the destruction caused by strong winds such as tornadoes and hurricanes. Wind has energy. Wind resources can be found across the country. Science and technology are providing more tools to accurately predict when and where the wind will blow. This information is allowing people to use wind on small and large scales. Wind is an increasingly important part of the United States’ energy portfolio. Faster than 9.5 m/s (faster than 21.3 mph) 7.6 to 9.4 m/s (17 to 21.2 mph) 5.6 to 7.5 m/s (12.5 to 16.9 mph) 0 to 5.5 m/s (0 to 12.4 mph) Data: NREL The Beaufort Scale BEAUFORT SCALE OF WIND SPEED BEAUFORT At the age of 12, NUMBER NAME OF WIND LAND CONDITIONS WIND SPEED (MPH) Francis Beaufort joined the British 0 Calm Smoke rises vertically Less than 1 Direction of wind shown by smoke drift Royal Navy. 1 Very light 1 - 3 For more than but not by wind vanes twenty years he Wind felt on face, leaves rustle, ordinary 2 Light breeze 4 - 7 sailed the oceans wind vane moved by wind and studied the Leaves and small twigs in constant 3 Gentle breeze 8 - 12 wind, which was motion, wind extends white flag the main power Wind raises dust and loose paper, small 4 Moderate breeze 13 - 18 source for the branches move navy’s fleet.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Energy & Wind Park Siting and Zoning Best Practices And
    2012 Wind Energy & Wind Park Siting and Zoning Best Practices and Guidance for States NARUC Grants & Research January 2012 NARUC The National Association A report for the Minnesota Public Utilities of Regulatory Commission Funded by the U.S. Department of Utility Energy Commissioners The report you are reading was created under the State Electricity Regulators Capacity Assistance and Training (SERCAT) program, a project of the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) Grants & Research Department. This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number DE-OE0000123. The report was authored by Tom Stanton. Throughout the preparation process, the members of NARUC provided the author(s) with editorial comments and suggestions. However, the views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the author(s) and may not necessarily agree with positions of NARUC or those of the U.S. Department of Energy. Special thanks to the Commissioners and staff at the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission for guiding this work, and to the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability and the National Energy Technology Lab for their continued technical assistance to NARUC. Please direct questions regarding this report to Miles Keogh, NARUC’s Director of Grants & Research, [email protected]; (202) 898-2200. Disclaimer: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.
    [Show full text]