Wind Energy & Wind Park Siting and Zoning Best Practices And
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
2012 Wind Energy & Wind Park Siting and Zoning Best Practices and Guidance for States NARUC Grants & Research January 2012 NARUC The National Association A report for the Minnesota Public Utilities of Regulatory Commission Funded by the U.S. Department of Utility Energy Commissioners The report you are reading was created under the State Electricity Regulators Capacity Assistance and Training (SERCAT) program, a project of the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) Grants & Research Department. This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number DE-OE0000123. The report was authored by Tom Stanton. Throughout the preparation process, the members of NARUC provided the author(s) with editorial comments and suggestions. However, the views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the author(s) and may not necessarily agree with positions of NARUC or those of the U.S. Department of Energy. Special thanks to the Commissioners and staff at the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission for guiding this work, and to the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability and the National Energy Technology Lab for their continued technical assistance to NARUC. Please direct questions regarding this report to Miles Keogh, NARUC’s Director of Grants & Research, [email protected]; (202) 898-2200. Disclaimer: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. Put It There! – Wind Energy & Wind-Park Siting and Zoning Best Practices and Guidance for States Tom Stanton Principal for Electricity January 2012 12-03 © 2012 National Regulatory Research Institute This page intentionally blank. Acknowledgments This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory under Award Number(s) DE-OE0000123. This paper results from a National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) grant for State Electricity Regulators Capacity Assistance and Training (SERCAT). Funding for the NARUC SERCAT program is provided under a cooperative agreement between NARUC and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL). NRRI is grateful to NARUC, the DOE, and NETL for supporting SERCAT and this project. The author wishes to thank these colleagues from the National Regulatory Research Institute. Without their assistance, this project would not have been possible. Deborah Luyo, Research Assistant, assiduously obtained, edited, and verified current information for the survey of wind siting and zoning practices presented in Appendix A and helped check the accuracy of the summary of the state surveys reported in Part II. Leah Goodwin supported this project with her expert editing and desktop-publishing skills. In addition to those colleagues from NRRI, I wish to thank: Tricia DeBleeckere, staff at the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, for her continuing consultation. Ben Hoen from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, for his careful reading and helpful suggestions. James McElfish of the Environmental Law Institute, whose 2011 report, State Enabling Legislation for Commercial-Scale Wind Power Siting and the Local Government Role, was an important resource for understanding practices in the states, and for helping us to correct several errors in our initial survey work. Charles McKeown of Michigan State University, Martin (“Mike”) Pasqualetti of Arizona State University, and Roopali Phadke of Macalester College, who generously shared reference materials and provided encouragement for this work. Victoria Pebbles and the staff and my colleagues who participate in the Great Lakes Wind Collaborative, whose excellent work in summarizing practices in the Great Lakes states (and the neighboring Canadian provinces of Ontario and Quebec) and important Best Practices guidebook helped inform this project. My colleagues who participate in Michigan’s State Wind Outreach Team (SWOT), for their ongoing efforts to provide the best available information and educate the Michigan public, including me, about wind energy technology, policy, and implementation. Paul Gipe, keeper of the website www.wind-works.org, for his long-standing diligence in indexing news items and sharing references about wind energy. Any inaccuracies, mistakes, or omissions are my responsibility. Comments, corrections, editorial guidance, and new information to update this report and the survey results are welcome. Comments can be submitted to: Tom Stanton, Principal for Electricity National Regulatory Research Institute [email protected] (517) 775-7764 i Online Access This paper can be accessed online via the National Regulatory Research Institute website at http://www.nrri.org/pubs/electricity/NRRI_Wind_Siting_Jan12-03.pdf. Disclaimer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe upon privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of the author expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. ii Table of Contents Acknowledgments .................................................................................................... i Online Access ........................................................................................................... ii Disclaimer ................................................................................................................ ii Table of Contents ................................................................................................... iii Table of Figures and Tables .................................................................................... v Executive Summary .......................................................................................... ES-1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1 I. Current Status ................................................................................................ 3 A. Summary information from the survey of state practices ................................................... 5 1. Responsibility for siting and zoning and certificates of necessity: state, local, or both ............................................................................................... 13 2. A primary rule about local authority: Home Rule versus Dillon’s Rule.............. 14 3. Mandatory evaluation criteria, voluntary guidelines, model ordinances, setback and sound standards, and local ordinances ............... 15 4. Supporting policies: clean energy portfolio standards and goals, promoting in-state wind energy facilities, and renewable energy zones ............. 16 B. The nature of wind-park opposition and list of major concerns ....................................... 17 II. Best Practices for Wind Siting and Zoning Procedures .......................... 22 A. Develop procedures that result in clarity, predictability, and transparency ...................... 23 B. Establish one-stop, pre-submission consultation for applicants ....................................... 23 C. Identify and map constrained and preferred wind energy development zones ................. 23 D. Include preferred development zones in transmission plans............................................. 24 iii E. Prepare and make readily available guidelines for participants ........................................ 25 F. Prepare and make available for local siting and zoning officials guidelines, checklists, technical resources, and model ordinances ................................... 25 G. Ensure that the sequence for obtaining permits and approvals meets requirements to allow development of suitable projects ........................................ 26 III. Guidelines for Implementing Wind-Park Siting and Zoning Criteria and Setback Distances ................................................................................. 27 A. Avoiding or mitigating public health and safety, nuisance and annoyance issues .......... 28 1. Noise, sound, and infrasound ..............................................................................