Expedition EUROPE Young People’S Views on Tomorrow’S Europe

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Expedition EUROPE Young People’S Views on Tomorrow’S Europe Expedition EUROPE Young people’s views on tomorrow’s Europe. Deze publicatie is ook beschikbaar in het Nederlands. Cette publication est également disponible en français. Diese Veröffentlichung ist auch in Deutsch erhältlich. Contents Preface 4 Introduction 5 Objectives and an account 6 Viewpoints 6 How the European Union works 14 6 Enlargement of the European Union 22 6 Key values within the European model 28 6 The future of Europe 36 Panel that selected the young Belgians 43 The young people and their mentors 44 The Prince Philippe Fund 52 Preface I am both honoured and grateful to be able to present to you, on behalf of the Board of Governors of the Prince Philippe Fund, this report on Expedition Europe. Expedition Europe has been a fascinating experience for the many people who took part in it. Over a peri- Mr Philippe Busquin, European Commissioner, who od of several months, young people debated, devel- were present to introduce and stimulate the debate; oped ideas and gave their creativity free rein. In this and Baron de Schoutheete de Tervarent, Baron and report you can read a polished version of these bright Baroness Snoy, Belgacom, the National Bank of plans for the future. Belgium, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Ryckevelde Foundation and the Belgian Armed In response to the call from the heads of state and Forces, who provided the necessary guidance and government at the summit in Nice, a group of 100 logistical support. young Belgians developed a vision of the Europe of tomorrow. They then sent it to the other 14 European Above all, the Board of Governors would like to Member States, where others of the same age dis- express its gratitude to HRH Prince Philippe, who cussed and analysed the texts, amending them where guided the process and was present at all the events. necessary. His interest and his valuable contributions were extremely helpful in bringing about the young peo- For the great event at the end of the project, two ple’s vision of the Europe of tomorrow. young people from each EU Member State came to Brussels for an exchange of ideas with their Belgian Now let us all work together to give Europe the ener- friends. The fruit of all these discussions can also be gy and commitment it deserves, so that we can be found on the following pages. completely free, within a European democracy built on sound values, to continue our work to create the This exciting process was only possible thanks to the prosperity underpinning the happiness of so many commitment and support of many people, including: European citizens. Mr Louis Michel, Minister of Foreign Affairs; Mr Jean-Luc Dehaene, former Prime Minister; Mr Karel Baron Paul Buysse Van Miert, former European Commissioner; and Chairman of the Prince Philippe Fund 4 Introduction In early 2001, the Prince Philippe Fund launched an awareness-raising campaign with a view to record- ing the expectations and suggestions of young people in Belgium regarding the new Europe. The initiative was dubbed ‘Expedition Europe’ and brought together a hundred young people from Belgium’s three Communities to ponder a number of topics relating to Europe as it is today and as it might look tomorrow. In the presence of HRH Prince Philippe, and under the guidance of a num- ber of senior Belgian politicians with international experience – Karel Van Miert, Jean-Luc Dehaene, Louis Michel and Philippe Busquin – they formulat- ed their viewpoints. In the following months, they then tested these views on young people from the other Member States of the European Union. This publication is a record of the whole project, and represents its concluding element. It will be pre- in the European model, and expectations about the sented by HRH Prince Philippe to the Prime Europe of the future. After each series of view- Minister, Guy Verhofstadt, to bring along with him points, you will also find the conclusions that to the European Council meeting in Laeken on emerged from a discussion held on 13 and 15 December 2001. 14 October 2001 between the young Belgians and young people from other European Member States. In what follows, we first present the objectives of Finally, you will find a presentation of the panel Expedition Europe and give a detailed account of that selected the young Belgians, and the names of the project. This is followed by the young people’s all the participants and those who guided the dis- viewpoints. They are arranged according to the four cussions. topics the young people considered: how Europe works, the enlargement of Europe, the key values 5 Objectives and an account about European society and the roles that young people regard as reserved for themselves and others. How it all began The project has been run in the context of Belgium’s presidency of the European Union from Recent surveys have shown that one in three young 1 July to 31 December 2001. The Belgian presidency’s people regard the European treaties as the basis for programme includes a wide range of initiatives. the Europe of the future, on condition that there is These are connected with the decisions and recom- also daily interaction mendations that have between Europe’s citi- emerged from the past zens and societies. This summits in Lisbon and is why it is crucial that Nice. Among other areas, young people, too, these relate to the active should be given the welfare state in Europe, opportunity to express the enlargement of the their opinions and take Union to include new an active part in the for- Member States, the mation of European workings of the thinking – in other European institutions words, that they should and the future of join in building a new Europe. One of the big and lasting European society. priorities for the years ahead is to develop better communication between those who make the deci- In order to record the expectations and suggestions sions in Europe and the different elements of the of young people in Belgium regarding the new population of Europe. Europe, the Prince Philippe Fund initiated an aware- ness-raising project in spring 2001. The idea behind The task that falls to Belgium during its presidency Expedition Europe was to bring together young thus goes beyond ensuring the smooth running of people from Belgium’s three Communities to pon- affairs within the Union. Our country must help lend der a number of topics relating to Europe as it is substance to a Europe that delivers positive added today and as it might look tomorrow. The ultimate value to its citizens. The people of Belgium, in all goal was to arrive at a synthesis of their thinking their diversity, can act as a catalyst in this process. 6 This approach ties in closely with the role of the Prince Philippe Fund, which is to bring the Communities of Belgium into contact with one another and enable them to discover one another’s individuality. Given that young people are the future of Europe, this specifically young people’s initiative has a special contribution to make, a con- tribution that supplements the other initiatives in Belgium’s programme for its European presidency in important ways. From the very outset of Expedition Europe, it was decided to work around topics that are closely con- nected with the subjects on the agenda for the European Council at Laeken. A number of aspects were selected and grouped under four headings. Each of the young people who applied to take part in Expedition Europe chose one of these topics to work on. The launch The main elements of the campaign consisted Expedition Europe was launched at a well-attended of a colourful logo (shown on the cover of this press conference on Monday, 12 March at the Royal publication), an advertisement, the website Palace in Brussels, attended by high-ranking per- www.expeditioneurope.be and a leaflet in Belgium’s sons including HRH Prince Philippe, Prime Minister three languages which was printed in 22,000 Guy Verhofstadt and Romano Prodi, President of copies. Together with the leaflets, forms were also the European Commission. At the press conference, distributed which young people could use to apply. the project itself was presented, together with the The advertisement was published in two weekend advertising campaign that would be used to editions of a number of national newspapers, and encourage young Belgians to promote their views. called on young people to visit the website. 7 Initially, the website had more or less the same Thursday 12 and Friday 13 April 2001 at the head- contents as the leaflet: the background and pur- quarters of the King Baudouin Foundation. The list pose of Expedition Europe was explained, the four of panel members is given at the back of this pub- topics were presented together with the various lication. The panel’s task was to select a maximum phases the project would go through, and the nec- of 100 young people to participate in Expedition essary explanations were given regarding the appli- Europe on the basis of the interviews. They applied cation and selection procedure. The application the following criteria: motivation and engagement, forms could also be downloaded from the website. knowledge about Europe, interest in the chosen In time, however, the website was to evolve into a topic and knowledge of the languages of the other fully-fledged communication platform for young Communities. An attempt was also made to arrive people, with four separate forums on which they at an evenly balanced group on the basis of gen- could share their opinions and reactions with one der, educational level and representation of another.
Recommended publications
  • Association of Accredited Lobbyists to the European Parliament
    ASSOCIATION OF ACCREDITED LOBBYISTS TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT OVERVIEW OF EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT FORUMS AALEP Secretariat Date: October 2007 Avenue Milcamps 19 B-1030 Brussels Tel: 32 2 735 93 39 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.lobby-network.eu TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction………………………………………………………………..3 Executive Summary……………………………………………………….4-7 1. European Energy Forum (EEF)………………………………………..8-16 2. European Internet Forum (EIF)………………………………………..17-27 3. European Parliament Ceramics Forum (EPCF………………………...28-29 4. European Parliamentary Financial Services Forum (EPFSF)…………30-36 5. European Parliament Life Sciences Circle (ELSC)……………………37 6. Forum for Automobile and Society (FAS)…………………………….38-43 7. Forum for the Future of Nuclear Energy (FFNE)……………………..44 8. Forum in the European Parliament for Construction (FOCOPE)……..45-46 9. Pharmaceutical Forum…………………………………………………48-60 10.The Kangaroo Group…………………………………………………..61-70 11.Transatlantic Policy Network (TPN)…………………………………..71-79 Conclusions………………………………………………………………..80 Index of Listed Companies………………………………………………..81-90 Index of Listed MEPs……………………………………………………..91-96 Most Active MEPs participating in Business Forums…………………….97 2 INTRODUCTION Businessmen long for certainty. They long to know what the decision-makers are thinking, so they can plan ahead. They yearn to be in the loop, to have the drop on things. It is the genius of the lobbyists and the consultants to understand this need, and to satisfy it in the most imaginative way. Business forums are vehicles for forging links and maintain a dialogue with business, industrial and trade organisations. They allow the discussions of general and pre-legislative issues in a different context from lobbying contacts about specific matters. They provide an opportunity to get Members of the European Parliament and other decision-makers from the European institutions together with various business sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Belgian Polities in 1988 Content 1. the Painstaking Forming of The
    Belgian Polities in 1988 Content 1. The painstaking forming of the Martens VIII Cabinet 303 A. The forming of regional governments complicates the making of a national cabinet . 303 B. The information mission of Dehaene 305 C. Dehaene's formation mission . 305 D. Martens VIII wins vote of confidence in Parliament 308 ll. Phase one of the constitutional reform 309 A. The amendment of seven constitutional articles 309 B. The special August 8, 1988 Act. 310 C. The bill on the language privileges . 312 111. The second phase of the constitutional reform 314 A. The new politica! status of the Brussels Region 314 B. The Arbitration Court . 315 C. The regional financing law. 315 D. Consultation and meditation 316 IV. The municipal elections, the government reshuffle and the debt of the larger cities 317 A. The municipal elections, Fourons and municipalities with special language status 317 B. The government reshuffle . 318 C. The debt of the larger cities 318 V. The social and economie policy of the Martens VIII cabinet 319 A. The 1988 and 1989 budgets 319 B. Tax reform 320 C. Labor Relations-Public Service Strikes-Health lnsurance 321 Vl. Foreign Affairs and Defense. 323 A. Foreign Affairs 323 B. Defense . 325 VII. lnternal politica! party developments. 325 Belgian polities in 1988 by Ivan COUTTENIER, Licentiate in Politica) Science During the first four months of 1988, Belgium witnessed the painstaking for­ mation of the Martens VIII center-left Cabinet. In October 1987, the Christian Democratic-Liberal Martens VI Cabinet had been forced to resign over the pe­ rennial Fourons affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Xxviiith Report on Competition Policy 1998
    European Commission XXVIIIth Report on Competition Policy 1998 (Published in conjunction with the `General Report on the Activities of the European Union Ð 1998') Brussels ð Luxembourg, 1999 A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu.int). Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1999 ISBN 92-828-7198-3 European Communities, 1999 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in Belgium PRINTED ON WHITE CHLORINE-FREE PAPER Contents NOTICE TO THE READER 6 FOREWORD BY MR KAREL VAN MIERT 7 Part One Ð XXVIIIth Report on Competition Policy 1998 SEC (99) 743 final 13 INTRODUCTION 19 I Ð Antitrust Ð Articles 81 and 82 State monopolies and monopoly rights Ð Articles 31 and 86 27 A Ð Modernisation of the legislative and interpretative rules 27 B Ð Consolidating the single market 35 C Ð Sector-based policies 41 D Ð Statistics 59 II Ð Merger control 61 A Ð Introduction 61 B Ð New developments 64 C Ð Statistics 79 III Ð State aid 81 A Ð General policy 81 B Ð Concept of aid 84 C Ð Assessing the compatibility of aid with the common market 89 D Ð Procedures 104 E Ð Statistics 109 IV Ð International activities 111 A Ð Enlargement 111 B Ð Bilateral cooperation 114 C Ð Multilateral cooperation 118 V Ð Outlook for 1999 121 ANNEX Ð CASES DISCUSSED IN THE REPORT 125 COMPETITION REPORT 1998 4 CONTENTS Part Two Ð Report on the application
    [Show full text]
  • Download the List of Participants
    46 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS Socialfst International BULGARIA CZECH AND SLOVAK FED. FRANCE Pierre Maurey Bulgarian Social Democratic REPUBLIC Socialist Party, PS Luis Ayala Party, BSDP Social Democratic Party of Laurent Fabius Petar Dertliev Slovakia Gerard Fuchs Office of Willy Brandt Petar Kornaiev Jan Sekaj Jean-Marc Ayrault Klaus Lindenberg Dimit rin Vic ev Pavol Dubcek Gerard Collomb Dian Dimitrov Pierre Joxe Valkana Todorova DENMARK Yvette Roudy Georgi Kabov Social Democratic Party Pervenche Beres Tchavdar Nikolov Poul Nyrup Rasmussen Bertrand Druon FULL MEMBER PARTIES Stefan Radoslavov Lasse Budtz Renee Fregosi Ralf Pittelkow Brigitte Bloch ARUBA BURKINA FASO Henrik Larsen Alain Chenal People's Electoral Progressive Front of Upper Bj0rn Westh Movement, MEP Volta, FPV Mogens Lykketoft GERMANY Hyacinthe Rudolfo Croes Joseph Ki-Zerbo Social Democratic Party of DOMINICAN REPUBLIC Germany, SPD ARGENTINA CANADA Dominican Revolutionary Bjorn Entolm Popular Socialist Party, PSP New Democratic Party, Party, PRD Hans-Joe en Vogel Guillermo Estevez Boero NDP/NPD Jose Francisco Pena Hans-Ulrich Klose Ernesto Jaimovich Audrey McLaughlin Gomez Rosemarie Bechthum Eduardo Garcia Tessa Hebb Hatuey de Camps Karlheinz Blessing Maria del Carmen Vinas Steve Lee Milagros Ortiz Bosch Hans-Eberhard Dingels Julie Davis Leonor Sanchez Baret Freimut Duve AUSTRIA Lynn Jones Tirso Mejia Ricart Norbert Gansel Social Democratic Party of Rejean Bercier Peg%:'. Cabral Peter Glotz Austria, SPOe Diane O'Reggio Luz el Alba Thevenin Ingamar Hauchler Franz Vranitzky Keith
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2007/2008
    Annual Report 2007/2008 The Voice of European Railways COMMUNITY OF EUROPEAN RAILWAY AND INFRASTRUCTURE COMPANIES COMMUNAUTÉ EUROPÉENNE DU RAIL ET DES COMPAGNIES D’INFRASTRUCTURE GEMEINSCHAFT DER EUROPÄISCHEN BAHNEN UND INFRASTRUKTURGESELLSCHAFTEN Table of Contents Foreword . .2 Guest .contribution Vice-President .of .the .european .commission .responsible .for .transport . Jacques .barrot . .4 in .Focus Promoting .rail .freight .corridors . .6 Transport policy of the European Commission . .6 Communication on a rail freight network . .8 CER concept for a Primary European Rail Freight Network . .9 Challenges for the future . .11 .external .costs .of .transport .and .the .revision .of .the .eurovignette .directive . .13 An unbalanced situation in the European freight market . .13 The Eurovignette Directive – a tool for a solution? . .14 Signs of progress – latest EU development . .15 Follow the Swiss! . .16 Interview with Werner Rothengatter . ..17 other .rail .Policy .deVeloPments the .risks .of .mega-trucks .on .europe’s .roads . .19 Developments .regarding .rail .passenger .transport . .20 Financing .rail .transport . .23 Progress .on .social .dialogue . .25 customs .and .security . .27 Further .progress .on .interoperability .legislation . .29 chronology: .Political .events .2007/2008 . .30 cer .eVents .2007/2008 conference .“Fighting .climate .change .– .the .potential .of .rail .transport” . .34 First .european .railway .award . .35 chronology .of .cer .activities . .36 about .cer member .railway .and .infrastructure .companies . .42 . cer .governance . .46 Annual Annual Report 2007/2008 cer .team . .52 cer .publications .2007/2008 . .54 railway .statistics .2007 . .55 list .oF .abbreViations . .58 20 .years .oF .cer: .time .line .1988 .- .2008 . .61 1 Foreword 2008 is a significant year for CER and a crucial year for rail transport in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • REY Commission (1967-1970)
    COMPOSITION OF THE COMMISSION 1958-2004 HALLSTEIN Commission (1958-1967) REY Commission (1967-1970) MALFATTI – MANSHOLT Commission (1970-1973) ORTOLI Commission (1973-1977) JENKINS Commission (1977-1981) THORN Commission (1981-1985) DELORS Commission (1985) DELORS Commission (1986-1988) DELORS Commission (1989-1995) SANTER Commission (1995-1999) PRODI Commission (1999-2004) HALLSTEIN COMMISSION 1 January 1958 – 30 June 1967 TITLE RESPONSIBLITIES REPLACEMENT (Date appointed) Walter HALLSTEIN President Administration Sicco L. MANSHOLT Vice-President Agriculture Robert MARJOLIN Vice-President Economics and Finance Piero MALVESTITI Vice-President Internal Market Guiseppe CARON (resigned September 1959) (24 November 1959) (resigned 15 May 1963) Guido COLONNA di PALIANO (30 July 1964) Robert LEMAIGNEN Member Overseas Development Henri ROCHEREAU (resigned January 1962) (10 January 1962) Jean REY Member External Relations Hans von der GROEBEN Member Competition Guiseppe PETRILLI Member Social Affairs Lionello LEVI-SANDRI (resigned September 1960) (8 February 1961) named Vice-president (30 July 1064) Michel RASQUIN (died 27 April 1958) Member Transport Lambert SCHAUS (18 June 1958) REY COMMISSION 2 July 1967 – 1 July 1970 TITLE RESPONSIBLITIES REPLACEMENT (Date appointed) Jean REY President Secretariat General Legal Service Spokesman’s Service Sicco L. MANSHOLT Vice-president Agriculture Lionelle LEVI SANDRI Vice-president Social Affairs Personnel/Administration Fritz HELLWIG Vice-president Research and Technology Distribution of Information Joint
    [Show full text]
  • Together /I[ Europe
    FORTNIGHTLY BUREAU DE DEPOT BRUXELLES "X" 1st November 1994 - If 57 +*+ t I TOGETHER .l * .r * t+* /I[ EUROPE EC NEWSLETTER FOR CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE REI"ATIONS WITII THE COMMT]NITY CONTENT5 ACCESSION STRATEGY FOR ASSOCIATED REI,ATIONS COINTNES WITH THE COMMT]NITY The meeting in Luxembourg on 31 October between the EU Council of Foreign Ministers and their counterparts from the ACCESSION STRATEffi 1 Associated Countries ofcentral and eastern Europe was singularly characterized as a "historical" meeting. Formally it was the first POLISH WEW OF DR,4FT meetingunder the framework of strategtof accession as opressed STPATEw 2 in the conclusions of the Copenhagen and Corfu European Coun- cils. It was also the first meeting which was held in advance of the GLOBAL POLIff FOR THE ECCouncil meeti.g so that the normalmeeting could take into BALNCS 1 account the proposals and attitudes elpressed. Thetwo andhalf hour debate wassubstantial.A significant NEGOTUNONS WTT.H oonvergence of views has been reached and this may permit the SLOWNU 5 Council to finalize, by the end of Norrcmber, the final document on the Strategl to Prepare the Countries of central and EUROPEAN TRAINING easternEurope forAccession for the Essen EuropeanCouncil in FOWDATTON 5 December. There is certain disappointment that there is not yet a ROITUNU-EU TOINT formal decision on ajoint meetingat Essen between the European COMMITTEE 6 Council andtheHeads of State and Governmentof the associated countries. Mr. Kinkel conlirmed that there was an agreement in DEFINITIW ANN.DUMPING principle to hold such meeting but no formal decision. DAW ON METAL-CI4LCruM- Sources in the German Presidency suggested to us, that a APPEALTOCOURT 6 fair amount of exchange of views among the Member Countries still needs to be made before the strategl plan would be ready AGNCWTURE COUNCIL for approrral and for presentation to the heads of state of the APPROWS IMPROWMENTS associated countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Sp.A (Socialistische Partij Anders)
    Le SP.a (Socialistische Partij anders) Régis DANDOY Le 13 octobre 2001, les membres du parti socialiste flamand SP adoptent en congrès à Gand un nouveau nom et un nouveau sigle pour leur parti qui devient le Socialistische Partij anders – Sociaal progressief alternatief (SP.a). Cette double appellation est révélatrice des tendances observées au cours de la dernière décennie dans ce parti, à savoir un discours rénovateur récurrent et une volonté de construire un grand mouvement de gauche, flamand et progressiste. Ces deux ambitions parallèles jalonnent son histoire récente, expliquant en grande partie les performances électorales, les participations au pouvoir, l’éphémère cartel électoral avec Spirit, le contenu des programmes électoraux ou encore le profil socio-démographique des électeurs et des membres du parti socialiste flamand. Le parti socialiste flamand provient de la scission linguistique de l’historique parti socialiste belge (PSB) en une aile francophone – menant à la création du PS – et une aile flamande en 1978. Les socialistes flamands étaient minoritaires par rapport aux francophones, ce qui eut un impact non négligeable, notamment sur la sélection des dirigeants et élites ou la ligne idéologique et programmatique du parti. Le SP (Socialistische Partij), officiellement créé lors du congrès des 8 et 9 mars 1980, se départit peu à peu de l’influence de son « grand frère » francophone. Le mot anders (autrement) dans le nom du parti fait en partie référence à cette prise de distance par rapport à l’héritage historique du parti et ses liens avec son alter ego francophone. Cette différenciation des deux anciennes ailes linguistiques du PSB atteint son apogée en 2007 lorsque le PS choisit de participer à la coalition en place au gouvernement fédéral, tandis que le SP.a fait le choix de l’opposition.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics: the Right Or the Wrong Sort of Medicine for the EU?
    Policy paper N°19 Politics: The Right or the Wrong Sort of Medicine for the EU? Two papers by Simon Hix and Stefano Bartolini Notre Europe Notre Europe is an independent research and policy unit whose objective is the study of Europe – its history and civilisations, integration process and future prospects. The association was founded by Jacques Delors in the autumn of 1996 and presided by Tommaso Padoa- Schioppa since November 2005. It has a small team of in-house researchers from various countries. Notre Europe participates in public debate in two ways. First, publishing internal research papers and second, collaborating with outside researchers and academics to contribute to the debate on European issues. These documents are made available to a limited number of decision-makers, politicians, socio-economists, academics and diplomats in the various EU Member States, but are systematically put on our website. The association also organises meetings, conferences and seminars in association with other institutions or partners. Proceedings are written in order to disseminate the main arguments raised during the event. Foreword With the two papers published in this issue of the series “Policy Papers”, Notre Europe enters one of the critical debates characterising the present phase of the European construction. The debate revolves around the word ‘politicisation’, just as others revolve around words like ‘democracy’, ‘identity’, bureaucracy’, ‘demos’, ‘social’. The fact that the key words of the political vocabulary are gradually poured into the EU mould is in itself significant. In narrow terms, the issue at stake is whether the European institutions should become ‘politicised’ in the sense in which national institutions are, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Le Barreau De Bruxelles, Barreau De La Capitale De L'europe
    1 Le barreau de Bruxelles, barreau de la capitale de l’Europe. Allocution du bâtonnier le 22 juin 2012 La société civile doit être ouverte à une souveraineté européenne démocratique et par exemple à l’élection d’un président de la Commission au suffrage universel de tous les citoyens européens. La vieille Europe doit avoir le cœur à se réveiller. Ma génération n’a connu ni l’occupation, ni la peur et les privations, ni les réfugiés et les déportés, ni l’épuration. Je suis un enfant de l’Europe, né dans un des pays fondateur de l’Union. Je suis Paul-Henry Spaak, Jean Ray, Willy De Clercq, Karel Van Miert, Philippe Busquin, Louis Michel, Etienne Davignon, Karel de Gucht. Je suis baigné de liberté d’établissement et de prestations de services. Je revendique les bienfaits pour chacun d’entre nous d’une union monétaire forte et d’une monnaie unique commune. Depuis mon entrée au barreau, nous n’avons connu que des crises successives, des bulles qui explosent, des subprime qui déraillent, des notes dégradées, des dettes souveraines non honorées, des marchés financiers qui déraillent. Aujourd’hui, la société civile doit se faire entendre plus que jamais. Le barreau le plus important en nombre du pays et le troisième barreau francophone le plus important du monde. Notre barreau, fait partie des grands barreaux du monde comme New York, Londres, Tokyo ou Singapour. A Bruxelles, nous avons le siège non seulement des institutions européennes, mais de nombreuses fédérations nationales et européennes d’avocats et je salue tout spécialement Madame Prunbauer-Glaser, présidente du CBE, entourée de plusieurs membres de la Présidence.
    [Show full text]
  • 25 Years of CER and EU Transport Policy
    25 Years of CER and EU transport policy On the right track for a single European railway area? June 2013 The Voice of European Railways Design and production: Tostaky - www.tostaky.be Photos kindly provided by CER members and http://ec.europa.eu Printed in Belgium in June 2013 Publisher: Community of European Railway and Infrastructure Companies (CER) Avenue des Arts 53, 1000 Brussels - Belgium - www.cer.be Disclaimer CER, nor any person acting on its behalf, may be held responsible for the use to which information contained in this publication may be put, nor for any errors which may appear despite careful preparation and checking. Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged. Foreword Back in 1988, 14 railway companies felt the need to establish a stronger link with the European institutions following increasingly significant political developments in transport. As a result, CER was founded as an independent group of the International Union of Railways (UIC) with its own offices in Brussels. Soon after this, in 1991, the European Commission began the first of its initiatives to regulate the railway sector by adopting the foundation for rail market opening - Directive 91/440/EEC. A number of other important rail legislative proposals followed: the first railway package was published in 2001, the second in 2004, the third in 2007, and the fourth one in January 2013. CER, representing the vast majority of EU rail business, has always been at the forefront in helping shape rail regulation. CER became an independent body in 1996, and the membership grew quickly to its current level of 82 railway undertakings, infrastructure companies and vehicle leasing companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Operations
    20 YEARS OF EUROPE! • ACTIVITY REPORT 1996-2016 OUR OPERATIONS OUR PROFILE / OUR IMPACT OUR PRESIDENTS OUR GOVERNING BODIES OUR TEAMS OUR FINANCING 49 20 YEARS OF EUROPE! • ACTIVITY REPORT 1996-2016 THE EU AND OUR COLLECTIVE SECURITY: STRONGER TOGETHER! Tribune by Jacques Delors, António Vitorino, Pascal Lamy, Enrico Letta and Yves Bertoncini, 17 June 2016 THE EU AND GREECE: CHANGING FRAMES AND PURSUING THE ODYSSEY Tribune by Jacques Delors, António Vitorino and Pascal Lamy, 5 July 2015 ERASMUS PRO: FOR A MILLION Our profile / our impact “YOUNG EUROPEAN APPRENTICES” BY 2020 Tribune by Jacques Delors, via our publications Henrik Enderlein, Pascal Lamy, Enrico Letta, François Villeroy de Galhau, ver the period from 1996 to 2016, the Jacques Delors Institute António Vitorino, Jean-Michel Baer O has published more than 900 publications, among which and Sofia Fernandes, 12 May 2015 150 Studies & Reports, more than 200 Policy Papers and Policy Briefs, FACES ON DIVIDES: THE MAY almost 300 Tribunes, 170 Syntheses of events or publications on 2014 EUROPEAN ELECTIONS Europe, and around 20 books. These publications can be viewed in Study by Yves Bertoncini and Thierry Chopin, French and English on our website. Foreword by Julian Priestley, 25 April 2014 Over 500 internal and external authors (see page 72) have provided their contribution to the debates on the main European challenges analysed by the Jacques Delors Institute, such as the Economic and Monetary Union, the Energy Union, relations with the EU’s neighbours, European democratic and institutional challenges, the Single Market, cohesion and solidarity, the Federation of Nation States, mobility or the EU’s influence in the world.
    [Show full text]