DOCSLIB.ORG

Coalition and Conservative Cabinet Reactions to the Communist Threat to Britain 1917-1927 Luke Alexander Maynard

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

i Coalition and Conservative Cabinet reactions to the Communist threat to Britain 1917-1927 Luke Alexander Maynard Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2019 ii Statement of originality I, Luke Maynard, confirm that the research included within this thesis is my own work or that where it has been carried out in collaboration with, or supported by others, that this is duly acknowledged below and my contribution indicated. Previously published material is also acknowledged below. I attest that I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the work is original, and does not to the best of my knowledge break any UK law, infringe any third party’s copyright or other Intellectual Property Right, or contain any confidential material. I accept that the College has the right to use plagiarism detection software to check the electronic version of the thesis. I confirm that this thesis has not been previously submitted for the award of a degree by this or any other university. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author. Signature: Luke Maynard Date: 15/05/2019 iii Abstract Despite plenty of fine research on the inter-war period there has, of yet, been no detailed study of the reaction in Whitehall and Westminster to the Bolshevik revolution in Russia during the Llyod George Coalition and Conservative Governments in this period. This thesis fills that gap by tackling the bitter clashes between moderates and hardliners in the Coalition and Conservative Cabinets over how, where and when Britain should handle the threat posed by Communism. It looks at the extraordinary circumstances of the age, a time of radical and profoundly uncertain political and social change, seen by many at the time as a point of potential rupture from the existing representative institutions and traditions. Starting with the Russian revolution and debate over military intervention in the Russian Civil War, it explores key flashpoints over the next ten years, including mass soldiers' strikes, rebellion on the Clyde and the General Strike of 1926. Using source material obtained from the Baldwin Archives, the Cabinet Archives, Hansard, the Chamberlain Papers and Churchill Archive, among others, the thesis maps and analyses the fluid changes in the factions within the Cabinet and the factors that influenced key political figures. Looking at the leadership of Lloyd George and Baldwin, it asks how governance was maintained over such an emotive issue and how the divides in Cabinet and the Conservative Party impacted the policy of government. This thesis argues that both premiers were able to forge a path which suited their own moderate approach but which was tempered by the views of the hardliners - a middle way that, by stretching cabinet collective responsibility to its limits helps account for the durability of both coalition and single party government in the decade following the First World War iv Acknowledgments Firstly, my thanks must go to Professor Tim Bale. He has been invaluable as my PhD supervisor: encouraging and always a great source of advice; helping with my understanding of the period, talking me through the difficult decisions and always available when I needed guidance. Thanks also to my friends and peers in the Department, Alan Wager, Dr Paul Simms and Dr Jack Brown, providing humour and advice along the way. The support, love and patience of my parents Ann and Paul, and my partner Olivia has also been above and beyond, keeping me sane over the last four years, offering respite when needed, and encouragement when necessary. v Contents Chapter 1. Introduction: Cabinet debate and splits within the Lloyd George Coalition and Conservative Government Party on the issue of Bolshevism, 1917 – 1927. ....................................... 1 The parameters of the research ........................................................................................................ 1 The period and political parties in question, and the focus on Cabinet ........................................... 2 The Cabinet and factions over Bolshevism...................................................................................... 6 Hardliners ..................................................................................................................................... 8 Moderates/Pragmatists ................................................................................................................. 9 The silent section ....................................................................................................................... 11 Diehards and Hardliners............................................................................................................. 12 Influences on faction membership ................................................................................................. 14 The gap to fill ................................................................................................................................. 16 The scene is set .............................................................................................................................. 18 Chapter 2. Literature Review ............................................................................................................. 21 Key literature.................................................................................................................................. 21 Overviews of the period ................................................................................................................. 23 On the parties ................................................................................................................................. 24 Key individuals .............................................................................................................................. 27 The British Left .............................................................................................................................. 32 Key events ...................................................................................................................................... 34 Chapter 3: “Kill the Bolshie, Kiss the Hun?” – Russian Intervention, 1917 – 1921 ......................... 40 Revolution in Russia and Brest-Litovsk ........................................................................................ 40 Argument for intervention and the end of war ............................................................................... 47 Early 1919: The debates in London and Prinkipo .......................................................................... 56 The Paris Peace Talks ..................................................................................................................... 65 March 1919–1920: Post-Paris debates and an end to intervention ................................................ 71 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................... 84 Chapter 4: “The Road to Revolution”? Domestic Unrest and Bolshevik Conspiracies, Britain 1917 - 1919 .................................................................................................................................................... 87 The government, the threat of revolution and party splits ............................................................. 88 1918 – 1919: Strikes ...................................................................................................................... 92 The Clyde ................................................................................................................................. 101 The soldiers' strikes, 1919 ........................................................................................................ 105 vi The police strikes, 1918 - 1919 ................................................................................................ 113 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................... 119 Chapter 5: “Where are those Communists? Let us hear them” – Domestic Unrest, 1920 – 1924 ... 121 Hands Off Russia, the last year of intervention, and Polish Aid .................................................. 123 The miners' strike, September – October 1920 ............................................................................ 127 Black Friday, April 1921 .............................................................................................................. 130 The Conservative Party, the Russian Trade Agreement and the Genoa Conference ................... 134 Genoa ....................................................................................................................................... 138 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................... 142 Chapter 6: “Behind Socialism stands Communism, behind Communism, Moscow!” Stanley Baldwin:, Rise to Power and Electoral Defeat, 1922 – 1925 ........................................................... 145 The election of 1922, retirement of Law and leadership election ................................................ 146 Leadership contest and the rise of Baldwin ................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Recall of Mps

    Recall of Mps

    House of Commons Political and Constitutional Reform Committee Recall of MPs First Report of Session 2012–13 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 21 June 2012 HC 373 [incorporating HC 1758-i-iv, Session 2010-12] Published on 28 June 2012 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Political and Constitutional Reform Committee The Political and Constitutional Reform Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to consider political and constitutional reform. Current membership Mr Graham Allen MP (Labour, Nottingham North) (Chair) Mr Christopher Chope MP (Conservative, Christchurch) Paul Flynn MP (Labour, Newport West) Sheila Gilmore MP (Labour, Edinburgh East) Andrew Griffiths MP (Conservative, Burton) Fabian Hamilton MP (Labour, Leeds North East) Simon Hart MP (Conservative, Camarthen West and South Pembrokeshire) Tristram Hunt MP (Labour, Stoke on Trent Central) Mrs Eleanor Laing MP (Conservative, Epping Forest) Mr Andrew Turner MP (Conservative, Isle of Wight) Stephen Williams MP (Liberal Democrat, Bristol West) Powers The Committee’s powers are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in Temporary Standing Order (Political and Constitutional Reform Committee). These are available on the Internet via http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmstords.htm. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the internet at www.parliament.uk/pcrc. A list of Reports of the Committee in the present Parliament is at the back of this volume.
  • The Russo-Japanese War, Britain's Military Observers, and British

    The Russo-Japanese War, Britain's Military Observers, and British

    Born Soldiers Who March Under the Rising Sun: The Russo-Japanese War, Britain’s Military Observers, and British Impressions Regarding Japanese Martial Capabilities Prior to the First World War by Liam Caswell Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia December 2017 © Copyright by Liam Caswell, 2017 Table of Contents Table of Contents………………………………………………………………………… ii Abstract………………………………………………………………………………….. iii List of Abbreviations Used……………………………………………………………… iv Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………… v Chapter I Introduction……………………………………………………………………. 1 Chapter II “An Evident Manifestation of Sympathy”: The Relationship between the British Press and Japan at War………………………………………………………….. 25 Chapter III “Surely the Lacedaemonians at Thermopylae were Not Braver than these Men”: British Observers and the Character and Ability of the Japanese Soldier…………………………………………………………………………………... 43 Chapter IV “Russia’s Invincible Foe”: Estimations of British Observers Regarding the Performance of the Imperial Japanese Army…………………………………………… 77 Chapter V A Most Impressive Pupil: Captain William Pakenham, R.N., and the Performance of the Imperial Japanese Navy during the War’s Maritime Operations……………………………………………………………………………... 118 Chapter VI Conclusion………………………………………………………………... 162 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………... 170 ii Abstract This thesis explores how Japan’s military triumphs during the Russo-Japanese War of 1904-’05 influenced British opinions regarding
  • Welsh Disestablishment: 'A Blessing in Disguise'

    Welsh Disestablishment: 'A Blessing in Disguise'

    Welsh disestablishment: ‘A blessing in disguise’. David W. Jones The history of the protracted campaign to achieve Welsh disestablishment was to be characterised by a litany of broken pledges and frustrated attempts. It was also an exemplar of the ‘democratic deficit’ which has haunted Welsh politics. As Sir Henry Lewis1 declared in 1914: ‘The demand for disestablishment is a symptom of the times. It is the democracy that asks for it, not the Nonconformists. The demand is national, not denominational’.2 The Welsh Church Act in 1914 represented the outcome of the final, desperate scramble to cross the legislative line, oozing political compromise and equivocation in its wake. Even then, it would not have taken place without the fortuitous occurrence of constitutional change created by the Parliament Act 1911. This removed the obstacle of veto by the House of Lords, but still allowed for statutory delay. Lord Rosebery, the prime minister, had warned a Liberal meeting in Cardiff in 1895 that the Welsh demand for disestablishment faced a harsh democratic reality, in that: ‘it is hard for the representatives of the other 37 millions of population which are comprised in the United Kingdom to give first and the foremost place to a measure which affects only a million and a half’.3 But in case his audience were insufficiently disheartened by his homily, he added that there was: ‘another and more permanent barrier which opposes itself to your wishes in respect to Welsh Disestablishment’, being the intransigence of the House of Lords.4 The legislative delay which the Lords could invoke meant that the Welsh Church Bill was introduced to parliament on 23 April 1912, but it was not to be enacted until 18 September 1914.
  • Proquest Dissertations

    Proquest Dissertations

    British Policy Towards Russian Refugees in the Aftermath of the Bolshevik Revolution Elina Hannele Multanen Ph.D. Thesis The School of Slavonic and East European Studies University College London University of London ProQuest Number: U120850 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest U120850 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ABSTRACT This thesis examines British government policy towards Russian refugees in the aftermath of the Bolshevik Revolution and the Civil War in Russia. As a consequence of these two events, approximately one million Russians opposing the Bolshevik rule escaped from Russia. The Russian refugee problem was one of the major political and humanitarian problems of inter-war Europe, affecting both individual countries of refuge, as well as the international community as a whole. The League of Nations had been formed in 1919 in order to promote international peace and security. The huge numbers of refugees from the former Russian Empire, on the other hand, were seen as a threat to the intemational stability. Consequently, the member states of the League for the first time recognised the need for intemational co-operative efforts to assist refugees, and the post of High Commissioner for Russian Refugees was established under the auspices of the League.
  • Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell

    Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell

    Copyrights sought (Albert) Basil (Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell) Filson Young (Alexander) Forbes Hendry (Alexander) Frederick Whyte (Alfred Hubert) Roy Fedden (Alfred) Alistair Cooke (Alfred) Guy Garrod (Alfred) James Hawkey (Archibald) Berkeley Milne (Archibald) David Stirling (Archibald) Havergal Downes-Shaw (Arthur) Berriedale Keith (Arthur) Beverley Baxter (Arthur) Cecil Tyrrell Beck (Arthur) Clive Morrison-Bell (Arthur) Hugh (Elsdale) Molson (Arthur) Mervyn Stockwood (Arthur) Paul Boissier, Harrow Heraldry Committee & Harrow School (Arthur) Trevor Dawson (Arwyn) Lynn Ungoed-Thomas (Basil Arthur) John Peto (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin & New Statesman (Borlasse Elward) Wyndham Childs (Cecil Frederick) Nevil Macready (Cecil George) Graham Hayman (Charles Edward) Howard Vincent (Charles Henry) Collins Baker (Charles) Alexander Harris (Charles) Cyril Clarke (Charles) Edgar Wood (Charles) Edward Troup (Charles) Frederick (Howard) Gough (Charles) Michael Duff (Charles) Philip Fothergill (Charles) Philip Fothergill, Liberal National Organisation, N-E Warwickshire Liberal Association & Rt Hon Charles Albert McCurdy (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett & World Review of Reviews (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Colin) Mark Patrick (Crwfurd) Wilfrid Griffin Eady (Cyril) Berkeley Ormerod (Cyril) Desmond Keeling (Cyril) George Toogood (Cyril) Kenneth Bird (David) Euan Wallace (Davies) Evan Bedford (Denis Duncan)
  • The Relationship of the Home Office and the Ministry Of

    The Relationship of the Home Office and the Ministry Of

    THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE HOME OFFICE AND THE MINISTRY OF LABOUR WITH THE TREASURY ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION 1919-1946 AN EVALUATION OF CONTRASTING NEEDS NORMAN GEORGE PRICE Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD London School of Economics (University of London) 1 UMI Number: U042642 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U042642 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 t h e s e s F 68 nu-oaaiS ABSTRACT The thesis examines three Departments of the British Home Civil Service from 1919 to 1946: the Home Office, the Ministry of Labour and the Treasury Establishment Division. The study investigates the contrasting needs, in establishment terms, of an old "Secretary of State" department the Home Office, performing a largely regulatory role, with a new department the Ministry of Labour performing an administrative role, and the relationship of both over establishment matters with the Treasury. The study assesses the roles of individual Administrative Class civil servants in the three departments from the rank of Principal to Permanent Secretary: with particular reference to the relationships existing between the Permanent Secretaries of the two departments and the Permanent Secretaries of the Treasury and their Controllers of Establishments.
  • Members of Parliament Disqualified Since 1900 This Document Provides Information About Members of Parliament Who Have Been Disqu

    Members of Parliament Disqualified Since 1900 This Document Provides Information About Members of Parliament Who Have Been Disqu

    Members of Parliament Disqualified since 1900 This document provides information about Members of Parliament who have been disqualified since 1900. It is impossible to provide an entirely exhaustive list, as in many cases, the disqualification of a Member is not directly recorded in the Journal. For example, in the case of Members being appointed 5 to an office of profit under the Crown, it has only recently become practice to record the appointment of a Member to such an office in the Journal. Prior to this, disqualification can only be inferred from the writ moved for the resulting by-election. It is possible that in some circumstances, an election could have occurred before the writ was moved, in which case there would be no record from which to infer the disqualification, however this is likely to have been a rare occurrence. This list is based on 10 the writs issued following disqualification and the reason given, such as appointments to an office of profit under the Crown; appointments to judicial office; election court rulings and expulsion. Appointment of a Member to an office of profit under the Crown in the Chiltern Hundreds or the Manor of Northstead is a device used to allow Members to resign their seats, as it is not possible to simply resign as a Member of Parliament, once elected. This is by far the most common means of 15 disqualification. There are a number of Members disqualified in the early part of the twentieth century for taking up Ministerial Office. Until the passage of the Re-Election of Ministers Act 1919, Members appointed to Ministerial Offices were disqualified and had to seek re-election.
  • The Conservatives in British Government and the Search for a Social Policy 1918-1923

    The Conservatives in British Government and the Search for a Social Policy 1918-1923

    71-22,488 HOGAN, Neil William, 1936- THE CONSERVATIVES IN BRITISH GOVERNMENT AND THE SEARCH FOR A SOCIAL POLICY 1918-1923. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1971 History, modern University Microfilms, A XEROX Company, Ann Arbor, Michigan THIS DISSERTATION HAS BEEN MICROFILMED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED THE CONSERVATIVES IN BRITISH GOVERNMENT AND THE SEARCH FOR A SOCIAL POLICY 1918-1923 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Neil William Hogan, B.S.S., M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 1971 Approved by I AdvAdviser iser Department of History PREFACE I would like to acknowledge my thanks to Mr. Geoffrey D.M. Block, M.B.E. and Mrs. Critch of the Conservative Research Centre for the use of Conservative Party material; A.J.P. Taylor of the Beaverbrook Library for his encouragement and helpful suggestions and his efficient and courteous librarian, Mr. Iago. In addition, I wish to thank the staffs of the British Museum, Public Record Office, West Sussex Record Office, and the University of Birmingham Library for their aid. To my adviser, Professor Phillip P. Poirier, a special acknowledgement#for his suggestions and criticisms were always useful and wise. I also want to thank my mother who helped in the typing and most of all my wife, Janet, who typed and proofread the paper and gave so much encouragement in the whole project. VITA July 27, 1936 . Bom, Cleveland, Ohio 1958 .......... B.S.S., John Carroll University Cleveland, Ohio 1959 - 1965 .... U.
  • Filenote Enq 2008/5/2-Pcc

    Filenote Enq 2008/5/2-Pcc

    FILENOTE ENQ 2008/5/2-PCC 13 October 2008 ‘Fetters and Roses’ Dinner This was an informal name for a dinner given at the House of Commons on 9 January 1924 for Members of Parliament who had been imprisoned for political or religious reasons. This note is intended to assist identification of as many individuals as possible in a photograph which was donated to the Library, through the Librarian, by Deputy Speaker Mrs Sylvia Heal MP. The original of the photograph will be retained by Parliamentary Archives, while scanned copies are accessible online. A report in The Times the following day [page 12] lists 49 people who had accepted invitations. Some of these were current MPs, while others had been Members in the past and at least two [Mrs Ayrton Gould and Eleanor Rathbone] were to become Members in the future. I have counted 46 people in the photograph, not including the photographer, whose identity is unknown. Mr James Scott Duckers [who never became an MP, but stood as a Parliamentary candidate, against Churchill, in a by- election only a few weeks after the dinner] is described on the photograph as being ‘in the chair’. The Times report also points out that ‘it was explained in an advance circular that the necessary qualification is held by 19 members of the House of Commons, of whom 16 were expected to be present at the dinner’. This raises the question of who the absentees were. One possibility might be George Lansbury [then MP for Poplar, Bow & Bromley], who had been imprisoned twice, in 1913 [after a speech in the Albert Hall appeared to sanction the suffragettes’ arson campaign] and in 1921 [he was one of the Poplar councillors who had refused to collect the rates].
  • Arthur Balfour and the Anglo-Japanese Alliance, 1894-1923

    Arthur Balfour and the Anglo-Japanese Alliance, 1894-1923

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of East Anglia digital repository A Matter of Imperial Defence: Arthur Balfour and the Anglo-Japanese Alliance, 1894-1923 Takeshi Sugawara A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of East Anglia School of History November 2014 © “This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that use of any information derived there from must be in accordance with current UK Copyright Law. In addition, any quotation or extract must include full attribution.” 1 Abstract This thesis investigates Arthur Balfour’s policy towards Japan and the Anglo-Japanese alliance from 1894 to 1923. Although Balfour was involved in the Anglo-Japanese alliance from its signing to termination, no comprehensive analysis of his role in the alliance has been carried out. Utilising unpublished materials and academic books, this thesis reveals that Balfour’s policy on the Anglo-Japanese alliance revolved around two vital principles, namely imperial defence and Anglo-American cooperation. From the viewpoint of imperial defence, Balfour emphasised the defence of India and Australasia more than that of China. He opposed the signing of the Anglo-Japanese alliance of 1902 because it was not useful in the defence of India. The Russo-Japanese War raised the concern of Indian security. Changing his lukewarm attitude, Balfour took the initiative in extending the alliance into India to employ Japanese troops for the defence of India.
  • 1034 the London Gazette, February 11, 1910. Count? of Monmouth

    1034 the London Gazette, February 11, 1910. Count? of Monmouth

    1034 THE LONDON GAZETTE, FEBRUARY 11, 1910. COUNT? OF MONMOUTH. Tyneside Division. Northern Division. John Mackinnon Robertson, Esq. The Right Honourable Reginald McKenna. Hexham Division. Western Division. Richard Darning Holt, Esq. Thomas Richards, Esq. Berwick- upon- Tweed Division. Southern Division. The Right Honourable Sir Edward Grey, Bart. Major-General Sir Ivor John Garadoc Herbert,, Borough of Norwich, Bart, O.B. Sir Frederick Low, K.C. BOROUGH OF MONMOUTH. George Henry Roberts, Esq. Lewis Haslam, Esq. COUNTY OP NOTTINGHAM. COUNTY OP MONTGOMERY. Bassetlaw Division. David Davies, Esq. William Ellis Hume-Williams, Esq., K.C. BOROUGH OP MONTGOMERY. Newark Division. John David Rees, Esq., C.I.E., C.V.O. John Ralph Starkey, Esq. BOROUGH OP MORPETH. Rushclijfe Division. The Right Honourable Thomas Burt. The Right Honourable John Edward Ellis. BOROUGH OP NEWCASTLE-UNDER-LYME. Mansfield Division. Josiah Clement Wedgwood, Esq. Arthur Basil Markham, Esq. BOROUGH OP NEWCASTLE-UPON-TYNE. BOROUGH OP NOTTINGHAM. Edward Shortt, Esq. West Division. Walter Hudson, Esq. Sir James Henry Yoxall. BOROUGH OP NEWINGTON. East Division. West Division. James Archibald Morrison, Esq. Cecil William Norton, Esq. South Division. Walworth Division. Major Henry Cavendish Bentinck (commonly James Arthur Dawes, Esq. called Lord Henry Bentinck). COUNTY OF NORFOLK. BOROUGH OP OLDHAM. North- Western Division. The Right Honourable Alfred Emmott. Sir George White. William Barton, Esq. South- Western Division. COUNTY OF OXFORD. Richard Winfrey, Esq. Northern or Banbury Division. Northern Division, Robert Bingham Brassey, Esq. Noel Edward Buxton, Esq. Mid or Woodstock Division. Eastern Division, Alfred St. G-eorge Hamersley, Esq., K.C. Sir Robert John Price. Southern or Henley Division.
  • Acq. by Mar. Early 18Th C., Built Mid-18Th C., Sold 1914) Estates: 4528 (I) 2673

    Acq. by Mar. Early 18Th C., Built Mid-18Th C., Sold 1914) Estates: 4528 (I) 2673

    742 List of Parliamentary Families Seat: Prehen, Londonderry (acq. by mar. early 18th c., built mid-18th c., sold 1914) Estates: 4528 (I) 2673 Knox [Gore] Origins: Descended from an older brother of the ancestor of the Earls of Ranfurly. Mary Gore, heiress of Belleek Manor (descended from a brother of the 1 Earl of Arran, see Gore), married Francis Knox of Rappa. One of their sons succeeded to Rappa and another took the additional name Gore and was seated at Belleek. 1. Francis Knox – {Philipstown 1797-1800} 2. James Knox-Gore – {Taghmon 1797-1800} Seats: Rappa Castle, Mayo (Knox acq. mar. Gore heiress 1761, family departed 1920s, part demolished 1937, ruin); Moyne Abbey, Mayo (medieval, burned 1590, partly restored, acq. mid-17th c., now a ruin); Belleek Manor (Abbey, Castle), Mayo (rebuilt 1831, sold c. 1942, hotel) Estates: Bateman 30592 (I) 11082 and at Rappa 10722 (I) 2788 (five younger sons given 1,128 acres worth £408 pa each in mid-19th c.) Title: Baronet 1868-90 1 Ld Lt 19th Knox Origins: Cadet of the Rappa line. 1. John Knox – {Dongeal 1761-68 Castlebar 1768-74} 2. Lawrence Knox – Sligo 1868-69 Seat: Mount Falcon, Mayo (acq. 19th c., built 1876, sold 20th c., hotel) Estates: Bateman 5589 (I) 2246. Still owned 93 acres in 2001. LA TOUCHE IRELAND Origins: Huguenot refugees who came from Amsterdam to Ireland with William III’s army. One fought at the Boyne. Sheriff 1797. They operated a poplin factory in Dublin from 1694 and then became bankers (1712) and country gentlemen simultaneously in the 18th and 19th centuries.