Federal and State Endangered and Threatened Species Expenditures

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Federal and State Endangered and Threatened Species Expenditures FEDERAL AND STATE ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES EXPENDITURES Fiscal Year 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES EXPENDITURES FISCAL YEAR 2016 PURPOSE ................................................................................................................................3 BACKGROUND .....................................................................................................................4 SECTION 18(1), FEDERAL EXPENDITURES ....................................................................5 SECTION 18(2), STATE EXPENDITURES ..........................................................................5 SUMMARY OF DATA ...........................................................................................................5 COMPARISON TO PREVIOUS REPORTS ..........................................................................6 Table 1. FY 2016 Reported Expenditures for Endangered and Threatened Species…………….7 Table 2. Species Ranked in Descending Order of Total FY 2016 Reported Expenditures….....98 Table 3. FY 2016 Reported Land Acquisition Expenditures for Endangered and Threatened Species……………………………………………………………...166 Table 4. FY 2016 Expenditures Reported by Individual Federal Agencies and the States…...178 Appendix A. Supplemental Guidance for Reporting Expenditures for the Conservation of Endangered and Threatened Species…………………………………………….184 Appendix B. Reports Provided by Other Federal Agencies……………………………..……189 Appendix C. Expenditures Reported by the States…………………………………………....449 ENDANGERED SPECIES EXPENDITURES FISCAL YEAR 2016 PURPOSE The Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) (Act) was reauthorized and amended on October 7, 1988, under Public Law 100-478. A new section 18 was added to the Act that requires the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) on behalf of the Secretary of the Interior to report annually on certain expenditures on a species-by-species basis. The section reads: SEC. 18. On or before January 15, 1990, and each January 15 thereafter, the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Fish and Wildlife Service, shall submit to the Congress an annual report covering the preceding fiscal year which shall contain (1) the accounting on a species-by-species basis of all reasonably identifiable Federal expenditures made primarily for the conservation of endangered or threatened species pursuant to this Act; and (2) an accounting on a species-by-species basis of all reasonably identifiable expenditures made primarily for the conservation of endangered or threatened species pursuant to this Act by States receiving grants under section 6. This document constitutes the 27th report by the Service pursuant to the requirements of section 18 of the Act. The report covers fiscal year 2016 (October 1, 2015 - September 30, 2016), although some States may be reporting for a different fiscal year period (without duplicating a previous year's reported data). To assist Federal and State agencies with more accurate accounting of expenditures, a multi-species reporting category was added to the FY12 and subsequent reports. This option gives agencies another way to report expenditures when it is not possible to determine individual species costs for those species that are part of a multi-species conservation activity. The term "State" as used in this report is defined in section 3(17) of the Act to mean any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands. The term “State agency” as used in this report is defined in section 3(18) of the Act to mean any State agency, department, board, commission, or other governmental entity which is responsible for the management and conservation of fish, plant, or wildlife resources within a State. The term "conservation," as defined in section 3(3) of the Act, means the use of all methods and procedures necessary to bring any endangered or threatened species to the point where the measures provided for by the Act are no longer necessary--including, but not limited to, research, census, law enforcement, habitat acquisition and maintenance, propagation, live trapping, and transplantation. For the purposes of this report, the definition of conservation is further expanded to include any and all actions taken by Federal and State agencies on behalf of threatened or endangered species listed pursuant to the Act. 3 BACKGROUND At the time the reporting requirement was enacted by Congress, the Service determined that a good faith effort was expected to develop methods to track and obtain data that are "reasonably identifiable." No extensive or extraordinary measures to develop exceptionally precise data were sought, nor were the reporting agencies expected to prorate staff salaries and other normal operational and maintenance costs not directed toward a particular species. The expenditures reported in this and the preceding reports do not necessarily constitute all expenditures made for each species. This report represents a compilation of reasonably identifiable expenditures for the conservation of listed species reported independently by Federal and State agencies. Expenditures for FY 2016 are reported for 1,605 domestic threatened and endangered species of the 1,703 domestic species that were listed under United States jurisdiction in 50 CFR Part 17 during FY 2016 up through September 30, 2016 (Tables 1 and 3). Expenditures are identified by listed entity, which may be a species1, subspecies2, Distinct Population Segment (DPS)3, or Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU)4, as identified in the Act’s implementing regulations at 50 CFR 17.11 and 17.12. These expenditures are reported separately for the Service and in aggregate for all other Federal agencies and the States (Tables 1 and 3). For these annual reports, the Service requests that all reporting agencies submit their data directly into our Web-based data entry system to ensure accuracy, consistency, and efficiency. At the time of submission, the reporting agencies certify that their information is accurate. The information provided in this report, pursuant to section 18 of the Endangered Species Act, is presented as it was submitted by these agencies. We do not verify an agency’s data after the data are submitted to us. In order to improve the Service’s efficiency in producing future editions of this report, the Service will no longer enter a reporting agency’s expenditures data into our Web- based system. All agencies must enter their own expenditures data into our Web-based system. Expenditures for candidate species or other species not listed in 50 CFR Part 17 as of the end of each fiscal year are not included in this report. In addition, other types of expenses, such as those for litigation, are not reported. 1 Species For purposes of the ESA, this term includes any species or subspecies of fish or wildlife or plants, and any Distinct Population Segment of any species of vertebrate fish or wildlife that interbreeds when mature. 2 Subspecies A taxonomic rank below that of species, usually recognizing individuals that have certain heritable characteristics distinct from other subspecies of a species. 3 Distinct Population Segment A subdivision of a vertebrate species that is treated as a species for purposes of listing under the Endangered Species Act. 4 Evolutionarily Significant Unit A Pacific salmonid stock that is substantially reproductively isolated from other stocks of the same species and which represents an important part of the evolutionary legacy of the species; functionally equivalent to DPS for the purpose of listing under ESA. 4 SECTION 18(1), FEDERAL EXPENDITURES Expenditures Reported by the Fish and Wildlife Service The Service's operational categories of expenditures include fisheries, refuges, land acquisition, law enforcement, research, international conservation, and regional and field office operations for listing, recovery, consultation, migratory birds, and grants. All reasonably identifiable expenditures that could be attributed to individual species within these activities have been included. The Federal assistance portion under section 6 of the Act for each species is included in the FWS Total in Table 1. The State share for each species for which a Federal contribution was made is included in the States Total column of Table 1. A portion of the Service's funds for consultation, listing, and recovery are incorporated into salaries, operations, and maintenance costs. If these costs contributed to the conservation of listed species and are reasonably identifiable to specific species, they are included in this report. Expenditures Reported by other Federal Agencies The Director of the Service sends a request to other Federal agencies identified as likely to have species-specific expenditures under the Act to report for each fiscal year. The Service provides guidance identifying what constitutes reasonably identifiable expenditures and how these are to be reported (Appendix A). For FY 2016, the Service and 26 other Federal agencies identified expenditures for the conservation of individual threatened and endangered species. Results from all responding Federal agencies are included in Appendix B. The data identified by those responding Federal agencies for individual species and multi-species conservation activities are tabulated in the “Other Fed” columns of this report (Tables 1 and 3). SECTION 18(2), STATE EXPENDITURES The
Recommended publications
  • Reporton the Rare Plants of Puerto Rico
    REPORTON THE RARE PLANTS OF PUERTO RICO tii:>. CENTER FOR PLANT CONSERVATION ~ Missouri Botanical Garden St. Louis, Missouri July 15, l' 992 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Center for Plant Conservation would like to acknowledge the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and the W. Alton Jones Foundation for their generous support of the Center's work in the priority region of Puerto Rico. We would also like to thank all the participants in the task force meetings, without whose information this report would not be possible. Cover: Zanthoxy7um thomasianum is known from several sites in Puerto Rico and the U.S . Virgin Islands. It is a small shrub (2-3 meters) that grows on the banks of cliffs. Threats to this taxon include development, seed consumption by insects, and road erosion. The seeds are difficult to germinate, but Fairchild Tropical Garden in Miami has plants growing as part of the Center for Plant Conservation's .National Collection of Endangered Plants. (Drawing taken from USFWS 1987 Draft Recovery Plan.) REPORT ON THE RARE PLANTS OF PUERTO RICO TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements A. Summary 8. All Puerto Rico\Virgin Islands Species of Conservation Concern Explanation of Attached Lists C. Puerto Rico\Virgin Islands [A] and [8] species D. Blank Taxon Questionnaire E. Data Sources for Puerto Rico\Virgin Islands [A] and [B] species F. Pue~to Rico\Virgin Islands Task Force Invitees G. Reviewers of Puerto Rico\Virgin Islands [A] and [8] Species REPORT ON THE RARE PLANTS OF PUERTO RICO SUMMARY The Center for Plant Conservation (Center) has held two meetings of the Puerto Rlco\Virgin Islands Task Force in Puerto Rico.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Theecological Systemsof Puerto Rico
    United States Department of Agriculture Guide to the Forest Service Ecological Systems International Institute of Tropical Forestry of Puerto Rico General Technical Report IITF-GTR-35 June 2009 Gary L. Miller and Ariel E. Lugo The Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is dedicated to the principle of multiple use management of the Nation’s forest resources for sustained yields of wood, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Through forestry research, cooperation with the States and private forest owners, and management of the National Forests and national grasslands, it strives—as directed by Congress—to provide increasingly greater service to a growing Nation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD).To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Authors Gary L. Miller is a professor, University of North Carolina, Environmental Studies, One University Heights, Asheville, NC 28804-3299.
    [Show full text]
  • 13488 Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 69 I Tuesday. April 10, 1990 I Rules and Regulations
    13488 Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 69 I Tuesday. April 10, 1990 I Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: defined under the authority of the Responsibility for the Steller sea lion National Environmental Pnlicy Act of Ash and Wildlife Service under the Endangered Species Act (16 1969, need not be prepared in regard to U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) lies with the regulations adopted under section 4(a) 5OCFRPart 1741 ~t O National Marine Fisheries Service of the Act. A notice outlining the (NMFS), National Oceanic and reasons for this determination was RIN 1O18-AB41 Atmospheric Administration, published in the Federal Register on Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Department of Commerce. See October 25, 1985 (48 FR 49244). and Plants; Emergency Usting of the Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1970. List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 17 Steller Sea Lion Section 4(a)(2)(A) of the Act provides that NMFS must decide whether a Endangered and threatened species, AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, species under its jurisdiction should be Fish, Marine mammals. Plants Interior. listed as endangered or threatened. The (agriculture). Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) is ACTION: Emergency rule. RegulationPromulgation responsible for the actual addition of a species to the List of Endangered and Accordingly, part 17, subchapter B of SUMMARY: The Service adds the Steiler chapter 1, title 50 of the Code of Federal (northern) sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus) Threatened Wildlife in 50 CFR 17.11(h). In the April 5, 1990, issue of the Regulations, is amended as set forth to theList of Endangered and below: Threatened Wildlife for a period of 240 Federal Register (55 FR 12645).
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics and Phylogeny of Oecopetalum (Metteniusaceae), a Genus of Trees Endemic to North and Central America
    Systematics and phylogeny of Oecopetalum (Metteniusaceae), a genus of trees endemic to North and Central America Humberto Adrián Hernández Urban1, Diego F. Angulo2, Maite Lascurain-Rangel3, Sergio Avendaño-Reyes4, Lilia Lorena Can5, Gregory W. Stull6 & Rodrigo Duno de Stefano5,7* 1. Maestría en Biociencias, Departamento de Zoología, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Prolongación de Carpio y Plan de Ayala s/n, 11340 México, D.F., México; [email protected] 2. Departamento de Ecología, Campus de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, AP 4-116, Colonia Itzimna, 97100, Mérida, Yucatán, México; [email protected] 3. Red Ambiente y Sustentabilidad, Instituto de Ecología, A. C., Apartado Postal 63, 91000 Xalapa, Veracruz, México; [email protected] 4. Instituto de Ecología, A.C. Herbario XAL, México; [email protected] 5. Herbario CICY, Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, A. C., Calle 43 No. 130, Col. Chuburna de Hidalgo, 97200 Merida, Yucatán, México; [email protected] 6. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, 1105 N. University Ave, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 U.S.A.; [email protected] 7. Herbario CICY, Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, A. C. (CICY), Calle 43 No. 130, Col. Chuburna de Hidalgo, 97200 Merida, Yucatán, México; [email protected] * Correspondence Received 23-V-2018. Corrected 11-III-2019. Accepted 16-VII-2019. Abstract: Oecopetalum Greenm. & C.H. Thomps. (Metteniusaceae) is distributed in
    [Show full text]
  • 20131121 Draft Puertoricanpa
    DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE REINTRODUCTION OF THE THIRD WILD POPULATION OF THE PUERTO RICAN PARROT IN PUERTO RICO November 21, 2013 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Caribbean Ecological Services Field Office Puerto Rican Parrot Recovery Program Office P.O. Box 1600 Río Grande, PR 00745 Phone: (787) 887-8769 Fax: (787) 887-7512 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I - PURPOSE AND NEED FOR PROPOSED ACTION ............................................. 1 1.1 PURPOSE ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 NEED .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 REQUIRED DECISIONS .................................................................................................... 3 1.4 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................. 3 SECTION II - ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................................... 4 2.1 HISTORY AND PROCESS USED TO FORMULATE THE ALTERNATIVES .............. 4 2.2 ALTERNATIVE DESIGN, EVALUATION AND SELECTION CRITERIA ................... 5 2.3 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED BUT ELIMINATED FROMDETAILED ANALYSIS6 2.4 ALTERNATIVES ANALYZED IN DETAIL ..................................................................... 6 2.4.1 Alternative A – No Action ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Instituto Politécnico Nacional Escuela Nacional
    INSTITUTO POLITÉCNICO NACIONAL ESCUELA NACIONAL DE CIENCIAS BIOLÓGICAS MAESTRÍA EN BIOCIENCIAS Tesis Que para obtener el grado de MAESTRÍA EN CIENCIAS Presenta: Humberto Adrián Hernández Urban Sistemática y filogenia del género Calatola Standl. (Metteniusaceae Schnizlein) para México Directores de tesis Dr. Emilio Estrada-Ruiz Laboratorio de Ecología, Departamento de Zoología, ENCB-IPN Dr. Rodrigo Duno de Stefano Herbario CICY, Unidad de Recursos Naturales Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, A.C. (CICY) RECONOCIMIENTOS Este trabajo de investigación se realizó bajo la dirección del Dr. Emilio Estrada Ruiz, en el Laboratorio de Zoología, en la Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, del Instituto Politécnico Nacional y del Dr. Rodrigo Duno de Stefano del Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán (CICY), Mérida, Yucatán. Este trabajo fue apoyado por la beca de maestría del CONACYT (741215/596953) otorgado a Humberto Adrián Hernández Urban y por los proyectos de investigación del CONACYT (240241) y SIP-IPN 20161352 y 20170872 del Dr. Emilio Estrada Ruiz. Agradezco y expreso el merecido reconocimiento al comité tutorial y jurado revisor: Dr. Emilio Estrada Ruiz, Dr. Rodrigo Duno de Stefano, Dr. Carlos Fabián Vargas Mendoza, Dr. Héctor Omar Mejía Guerrero y M. en C. Ma. Patricia Vera Caletti, por su esfuerzo conjunto que significó invaluables revisiones, críticas y observaciones a este trabajo. Agradecimientos Agradezco a CONACYT por el apoyo económico brindado para la elaboración de esta investigación. Agradezco al Instituto Politécnico Nacional por permitirme ser parte de esta magnífica institución. Agradezco al Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, AC, por el apoyo facilitado durante mi estancia. Quiero agradecer a mi director de tesis, el Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Puerto Rico State Wildlife Action Plan: Ten Year Review
    Puerto Rico State Wildlife Action Plan: Ten Year Review Puerto Rico Department of Natural and Environmental Resources. September 2015. Puerto Rico State Wildlife Action Plan Page TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................................... 4 LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................................... 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............................................................................................................................. 7 SUMMARY OF CHANGES ........................................................................................................................ 11 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 13 CHAPTER 2. SPECIES OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED ..................................................................... 19 AMPHIBIANS .......................................................................................................................................... 21 SPECIES AND ACTIONS FOR PRIORITIZATION ........................................................................................................ 21 STATUS AND PROTECTION OF SPECIES OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED ............................................................... 23 FOREST COMPOSITION, STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION (FROM DRNA 2010). ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • HPB 18 1 TEXT Final.Indd
    NoteS oN the FLoWer, FrUit, aNd the reprodUctive pheNoLogy oF the eLUSive OTTOSCHULZIA RHODOXYLON EUGENIO SANTIAGO-VALENTÍN1, 2 AND ELSON VIRUET-OQUENDO1 Abstract. We present a morphological description of the flower and fruit of Ottoschulzia rhodoxylon based on material collected at Hacienda La Esperanza Nature Reserve, Puerto Rico, cultivated material, as well as on data in herbarium specimens. Plants of Ottoschulzia rhodoxylon bear hermaphrodite flowers, and at least some appear to be fully functional. We also summarize phenological data for the species: flowering occur at the beginning of the rainy season, especially June; fruits develop further, until November. Resumen. Se presenta una descripción morfológica de la flor y el fruto deOttoschulzia rhodoxylon, con base en material recolectado en la Reserva Natural Hacienda La Esperanza, Puerto Rico, en material cultivado, así como de datos de especímenes de herbario. Las plantas de Ottoschulzia rhodoxylon producen flores hermafroditas, algunas de las cuales parecen completamente funcionales. También se resumen datos fenológicos para la especie: la floración ocurre a comienzo de la época de lluvias, especialmente en junio; los frutos se desarrollan posterior- mente, hasta noviembre. Keywords: floral morphology, greater antilles, icacinaceae, Ottoschulzia, phenology The genus Ottoschulzia (Icacinaceae sensu of the genus. Unfortunately, fertile specimens stricto, Kårehed, 2001; Lens et al., 2008) available at that time were sparse, and prevented was established by Ignatz Urban (1912), the author from completing the morphogical and comprises four species of trees from the description of reproductive structures in O. Greater Antilles (O. cubensis Urb. in Cuba, O. rhodoxylon and O. domingensis. In 1982, domingensis Urb. in Hispaniola, O.
    [Show full text]
  • Arecibo Waste to Energy and Resource Recovery Project FEIS
    Arecibo Waste-to-Energy and Resource Recovery Project Final Environmental Impact Statement Prepared for: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Rural Utilities Service January 2017 This page intentionally left blank. Arecibo Waste-to-Energy Project Final EIS January 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................. i LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... vi LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................... vii ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................ ix 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Project Overview and Description ............................................................................. 1-2 1.2 Project Background .................................................................................................... 1-2 1.2.1 Energy Supply ................................................................................................ 1-2 1.2.2 Renewable Energy Portfolio Standards ......................................................... 1-3 1.2.3 Reserve Capacity ........................................................................................... 1-4 1.2.4 Solid
    [Show full text]
  • Resolving Basal Lamiid Phylogeny and the Circumscription of Icacinaceae with a Plastome-Scale Data Set1
    RESEARCH ARTICLE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY Resolving basal lamiid phylogeny and the circumscription of Icacinaceae with a plastome-scale data set 1 Gregory W. Stull2,3,5 , Rodrigo Duno de Stefano 4 , Douglas E. Soltis 2,3 , and Pamela S. Soltis 3 PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Major relationships within Lamiidae , an asterid clade with ~40 000 species, have largely eluded resolution despite two decades of intensive study. The phylogenetic positions of Icacinaceae and other early-diverging lamiid clades (Garryales, Metteniusaceae, and Oncothecaceae) have been particularly problematic, hindering classifi cation and impeding our understanding of early lamiid (and euasterid) character evolution. METHODS: To resolve basal lamiid phylogeny, we sequenced 50 plastid genomes using the Illumina sequencing platform and combined these with avail- able asterid plastome sequence data for more comprehensive phylogenetic analyses. KEY RESULTS: Our analyses resolved basal lamiid relationships with strong support, including the circumscription and phylogenetic position of the enig- matic Icacinaceae. This greatly improved basal lamiid phylogeny off ers insight into character evolution and facilitates an updated classifi cation for this clade, which we present here, including phylogenetic defi nitions for 10 new or converted clade names. We also off er recommendations for applying this classifi cation to the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG) system, including the recognition of a reduced Icacinaceae, an expanded Metteniusaceae, and two orders new to APG: Icacinales (Icacinaceae + Oncothecaceae) and Metteniusales (Metteniusaceae). CONCLUSIONS: The lamiids possibly radiated from an ancestry of tropical trees with inconspicuous fl owers and large, drupaceous fruits, given that these morphological characters are distributed across a grade of lineages (Icacinaceae, Oncothecaceae, Metteniusaceae) subtending the core lamiid clade (Bor- aginales, Gentianales, Lamiales, Solanales, Vahlia ).
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Refuges and Other Nearby Reserves in Southwestern Puerto Rico
    United States Department of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Agriculture Forest Service Service Refuges And Other Nearby Reserves In Southwestern Puerto Rico International Institute of Tropical Forestry General Technical Peter L. Weaver and Joseph J. Schwagerl Report IITF-40 Front cover Top, Cabo Rojo National Wildlife Refuge. The Cabo Rojo Salt flats, critical wildlife habitat at the southwestern tip of Puerto Rico, boast a long history of wildlife use and human activity (Photo by Jorge Salivia). Bottom, Laguna Cartagena National Wildlife Refuge. Farming and water diversion measures around the Cartagena Lagoon in southwestern Puerto Rico have modified its water quality and regimen (Photo by Peter L. Weaver) . Top, Wildlife refuge. Welcome to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Cabo Rojo National Wildlife Refuge via Mariano Rodríguez Lane (Photo by Peter L. Weaver). Bottom, Headquarters. First constructed to monitor regional communications, the original headquarters was the home of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for 35 years (Photo by Peter L. Weaver). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Refuges And Other Nearby Reserves In Southwestern Puerto Rico Peter L. Weaver International Institute of Tropical Forestry U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Río Piedras, Puerto Rico and Joseph J. Schwagerl U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cabo Rojo, Puerto Rico June 2009 International Institute of Tropical Forestry Jardín Botánico Sur 1201 Calle Ceiba San Juan, PR 00926-1119 Contents Page Abstract ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2020–0059; FF09E22000 FXES11130900000 212]
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 07/14/2021 and available online at Billing Code 4333–15 federalregister.gov/d/2021-14661, and on govinfo.gov DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2020–0059; FF09E22000 FXES11130900000 212] RIN 1018–BE56 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Reclassification of the Palo de Rosa from Endangered to Threatened with Section 4(d) Rule AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), propose to reclassify palo de rosa (Ottoschulzia rhodoxylon) from endangered to threatened (downlist) under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). The proposed downlisting is based on our evaluation of the best available scientific and commercial information, which indicates that the species’ status has improved such that it is not currently in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range, but that it is still likely to become so in the foreseeable future. We also propose a rule under section 4(d) of the Act that provides for the conservation of palo de rosa. DATES: We will accept comments received or postmarked on or before [INSERT DATE 60 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. Comments submitted electronically using the Federal eRulemaking Portal (see ADDRESSES, below) must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the closing date. We must receive requests for a public hearing, in writing, at the address shown in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by [INSERT DATE 45 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].
    [Show full text]