DOCSLIB.ORG

Arecibo Waste to Energy and Resource Recovery Project FEIS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arecibo Waste to Energy and Resource Recovery Project FEIS Arecibo Waste-to-Energy and Resource Recovery Project Final Environmental Impact Statement Prepared for: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Rural Utilities Service January 2017 This page intentionally left blank. Arecibo Waste-to-Energy Project Final EIS January 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................. i LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... vi LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................... vii ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................ ix 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Project Overview and Description ............................................................................. 1-2 1.2 Project Background .................................................................................................... 1-2 1.2.1 Energy Supply ................................................................................................ 1-2 1.2.2 Renewable Energy Portfolio Standards ......................................................... 1-3 1.2.3 Reserve Capacity ........................................................................................... 1-4 1.2.4 Solid Waste Management and Capacity ........................................................ 1-4 1.2.5 Disposal of Municipal Solid Waste ............................................................... 1-7 1.2.6 Solid Waste Generation in Puerto Rico ......................................................... 1-8 1.2.7 Existing Operating Landfills Overview ......................................................... 1-8 1.2.8 Recycling Rates for Puerto Rico .................................................................. 1-10 1.3 Purpose and Need for the Action ............................................................................. 1-11 1.3.1 Rural Utilities Service .................................................................................. 1-11 1.3.2 Energy Answers’ Purpose and Need............................................................ 1-12 1.3.3 Energy Needs in Puerto Rico ....................................................................... 1-12 1.3.4 Municipal Solid Waste Purpose and Need................................................... 1-13 1.4 Authorizing Actions ................................................................................................. 1-13 1.5 Public Participation .................................................................................................. 1-18 1.5.1 Scoping Process ........................................................................................... 1-18 1.5.2 Public Review and Comment Analysis........................................................ 1-19 1.5.3 Issues Considered But Dismissed ................................................................ 1-20 2.0 PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES ............................................................ 2-1 2.1 Alternatives Considered But Eliminated From Further Consideration...................... 2-1 2.1.1 Project Site Selection ..................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.2 Waste-to-Energy Technologies ...................................................................... 2-3 2.1.3 Water Sources ................................................................................................ 2-6 i Arecibo Waste-to-Energy Project Final EIS January 2017 2.1.4 Alternative Fuel and Renewable Energy Resources ...................................... 2-8 2.2 Selection of Proposed Alternative ............................................................................. 2-9 2.2.1 No-action Alternative..................................................................................... 2-9 2.2.2 Arecibo Waste-to-Energy and Resource Recovery Project ......................... 2-11 2.2.3 Flooding ....................................................................................................... 2-32 2.2.4 Stormwater Management ............................................................................. 2-32 2.3 Utility support Works .............................................................................................. 2-33 2.3.1 Brackish Water Pumping and Transfer Pipeline .......................................... 2-33 2.3.2 Power Transmission Line and Improvements to Existing Substation ......... 2-34 3.0 PRESENT ENVIRONMENT AND EFFECTS OF ALTERNATIVES ....................... 3-1 3.1 Soils and Geology ...................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 Affected Environment .................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.2 Effects Analysis ............................................................................................. 3-8 3.2 Water Resources ...................................................................................................... 3-10 3.2.1 Affected Environment .................................................................................. 3-10 ii Arecibo Waste-to-Energy Project Final EIS January 2017 3.2.2 Effects Analysis ........................................................................................... 3-27 3.3 Air Quality ............................................................................................................... 3-36 3.3.1 Affected Environment .................................................................................. 3-36 3.3.2 Effects Analysis ........................................................................................... 3-44 3.4 Biological Resources ............................................................................................... 3-59 3.4.1 Affected Environment .................................................................................. 3-59 3.4.2 Environmental Effects ................................................................................. 3-63 3.5 Land Resources ........................................................................................................ 3-70 3.5.1 Affected Environment .................................................................................. 3-70 3.5.2 Effects Analysis ........................................................................................... 3-75 3.6 Visual Resources ...................................................................................................... 3-78 3.6.1 Affected Environment .................................................................................. 3-78 3.6.2 Effects Analysis ........................................................................................... 3-83 3.7 Acoustic Environment ............................................................................................. 3-86 iii Arecibo Waste-to-Energy Project Final EIS January 2017 3.7.1 Affected Environment .................................................................................. 3-86 3.7.2 Effects Analysis ........................................................................................... 3-91 3.8 Transportation .......................................................................................................... 3-96 3.8.1 Affected Environment .................................................................................. 3-96 3.8.2 Effects Analysis ......................................................................................... 3-102 3.9 Cultural Resources/Historic Properties .................................................................. 3-103 3.9.1 Definition of Cultural Resources and Historic Properties ......................... 3-103 3.9.2 Area of Potential Effects ............................................................................ 3-104 3.9.3 Culture History Overview .......................................................................... 3-105 3.9.4 Archeological Resources ........................................................................... 3-116 3.9.5 Historic Structures ..................................................................................... 3-117 3.9.6 Effects Analysis ......................................................................................... 3-117 3.10 Public Health and Safety ........................................................................................ 3-117 3.10.1 Affected Environment ................................................................................ 3-117 3.10.2 Effects Analysis ......................................................................................... 3-118 3.11 Socioeconomics and Environmental Justice .......................................................... 3-124 3.11.1 Affected Environment ................................................................................ 3-124 3.11.2 Effects Analysis ......................................................................................... 3-131 iv Arecibo Waste-to-Energy Project Final EIS January 2017 4.0 OTHER REQUIRED CONSIDERATIONS .................................................................. 4-1 4.1 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts ..................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 84, No. 119/Thursday, June 20, 2019/Notices
    28850 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 119 / Thursday, June 20, 2019 / Notices or speech-impaired individuals may status reviews of 53 species under the Relay Service at 800–877–8339 for TTY access this number through TTY by Endangered Species Act, as amended. A assistance. calling the toll-free Federal Relay 5-year review is an assessment of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Service at 800–877–8339. best scientific and commercial data Dated: June 14, 2019. available at the time of the review. We Why do we conduct 5-year reviews? are requesting submission of Brian D. Montgomery, Under the Endangered Species Act of Acting Deputy Secretary. information that has become available since the last reviews of these species. 1973, as amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 [FR Doc. 2019–13146 Filed 6–19–19; 8:45 am] et seq.), we maintain lists of endangered BILLING CODE 4210–67–P DATES: To allow us adequate time to and threatened wildlife and plant conduct these reviews, we must receive species in title 50 of the Code of Federal your comments or information on or Regulations (CFR) at 50 CFR 17.11 (for DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR before August 19, 2019. However, we wildlife) and 17.12 (for plants: List). will continue to accept new information Section 4(c)(2)(A) of the ESA requires us Fish and Wildlife Service about any listed species at any time. to review each listed species’ status at least once every 5 years. Our regulations [FWS–R4–ES–2019–N037; ADDRESSES: For instructions on how to FXES11130900000C2–190–FF09E32000] submit information and review at 50 CFR 424.21 require that we publish a notice in the Federal Register Endangered and Threatened Wildlife information that we receive on these species, see Request for New announcing those species under active and Plants; Initiation of 5-Year Status review.
    [Show full text]
  • Reporton the Rare Plants of Puerto Rico
    REPORTON THE RARE PLANTS OF PUERTO RICO tii:>. CENTER FOR PLANT CONSERVATION ~ Missouri Botanical Garden St. Louis, Missouri July 15, l' 992 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Center for Plant Conservation would like to acknowledge the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and the W. Alton Jones Foundation for their generous support of the Center's work in the priority region of Puerto Rico. We would also like to thank all the participants in the task force meetings, without whose information this report would not be possible. Cover: Zanthoxy7um thomasianum is known from several sites in Puerto Rico and the U.S . Virgin Islands. It is a small shrub (2-3 meters) that grows on the banks of cliffs. Threats to this taxon include development, seed consumption by insects, and road erosion. The seeds are difficult to germinate, but Fairchild Tropical Garden in Miami has plants growing as part of the Center for Plant Conservation's .National Collection of Endangered Plants. (Drawing taken from USFWS 1987 Draft Recovery Plan.) REPORT ON THE RARE PLANTS OF PUERTO RICO TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements A. Summary 8. All Puerto Rico\Virgin Islands Species of Conservation Concern Explanation of Attached Lists C. Puerto Rico\Virgin Islands [A] and [8] species D. Blank Taxon Questionnaire E. Data Sources for Puerto Rico\Virgin Islands [A] and [B] species F. Pue~to Rico\Virgin Islands Task Force Invitees G. Reviewers of Puerto Rico\Virgin Islands [A] and [8] Species REPORT ON THE RARE PLANTS OF PUERTO RICO SUMMARY The Center for Plant Conservation (Center) has held two meetings of the Puerto Rlco\Virgin Islands Task Force in Puerto Rico.
    [Show full text]
  • Review the Conservation Status of West Indian Palms (Arecaceae)
    Oryx Vol 41 No 3 July 2007 Review The conservation status of West Indian palms (Arecaceae) Scott Zona, Rau´l Verdecia, Angela Leiva Sa´nchez, Carl E. Lewis and Mike Maunder Abstract The conservation status of 134 species, sub- ex situ and in situ conservation projects in the region’s species and varieties of West Indian palms (Arecaceae) botanical gardens. We recommend that preliminary is assessed and reviewed, based on field studies and conservation assessments be made of the 25 Data current literature. We find that 90% of the palm taxa of Deficient taxa so that conservation measures can be the West Indies are endemic. Using the IUCN Red List implemented for those facing imminent threats. categories one species is categorized as Extinct, 11 taxa as Critically Endangered, 19 as Endangered, and 21 as Keywords Arecaceae, Caribbean, Palmae, palms, Red Vulnerable. Fifty-seven taxa are classified as Least List, West Indies. Concern. Twenty-five taxa are Data Deficient, an indica- tion that additional field studies are urgently needed. The 11 Critically Endangered taxa warrant immediate This paper contains supplementary material that can conservation action; some are currently the subject of only be found online at http://journals.cambridge.org Introduction Recent phylogenetic work has changed the status of one genus formerly regarded as endemic: Gastrococos is now The islands of the West Indies (the Caribbean Islands shown to be part of the widespread genus Acrocomia sensu Smith et al., 2004), comprising the Greater and (Gunn, 2004). Taking these changes into consideration, Lesser Antilles, along with the Bahamas Archipelago, endemism at the generic level is 14%.
    [Show full text]
  • Sitios Arqueológicos De Ponce
    Sitios Arqueológicos de Ponce RESUMEN ARQUEOLÓGICO DEL MUNICIPIO DE PONCE La Perla del Sur o Ciudad Señorial, como popularmente se le conoce a Ponce, tiene un área de aproximadamente 115 kilómetros cuadrados. Colinda por el oeste con Peñuelas, por el este con Juana Díaz, al noroeste con Adjuntas y Utuado, y al norte con Jayuya. Pertenece al Llano Costanero del Sur y su norte a la Cordillera Central. Ponce cuenta con treinta y un barrios, de los cuales doce componen su zona urbana: Canas Urbano, Machuelo Abajo, Magueyes Urbano, Playa, Portugués Urbano, San Antón, Primero, Segundo, Tercero, Cuarto, Quinto y Sexto, estos últimos seis barrios son parte del casco histórico de Ponce. Por esta zona urbana corren los ríos Bucaná, Portugués, Canas, Pastillo y Matilde. En su zona rural, los barrios que la componen son: Anón, Bucaná, Canas, Capitanejo, Cerrillos, Coto Laurel, Guaraguao, Machuelo Arriba, Magueyes, Maragüez, Marueño, Monte Llanos, Portugués, Quebrada Limón, Real, Sabanetas, San Patricio, Tibes y Vallas. Ponce cuenta con un rico ajuar arquitectónico, que se debe en parte al asentamiento de extranjeros en la época en que se formaba la ciudad y la influencia que aportaron a la construcción de las estructuras del casco urbano. Su arquitectura junto con los yacimientos arqueológicos que se han descubierto en el municipio, son parte del Inventario de Recursos Culturales de Ponce. Esta arquitectura se puede apreciar en las casas que fueron parte de personajes importantes de la historia de Ponce como la Casa Paoli (PO-180), Casa Salazar (PO-182) y Casa Rosaly (PO-183), entre otras. Se puede ver también en las escuelas construidas a principios del siglo XX: Ponce High School (PO-128), Escuela McKinley (PO-131), José Celso Barbosa (PO-129) y la escuela Federico Degetau (PO-130), en sus iglesias, la Iglesia Metodista Unida (PO-126) y la Catedral Nuestra Señora de Guadalupe (PO-127) construida en el siglo XIX.
    [Show full text]
  • National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands 1996
    National List of Vascular Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary Indicator by Region and Subregion Scientific Name/ North North Central South Inter- National Subregion Northeast Southeast Central Plains Plains Plains Southwest mountain Northwest California Alaska Caribbean Hawaii Indicator Range Abies amabilis (Dougl. ex Loud.) Dougl. ex Forbes FACU FACU UPL UPL,FACU Abies balsamea (L.) P. Mill. FAC FACW FAC,FACW Abies concolor (Gord. & Glend.) Lindl. ex Hildebr. NI NI NI NI NI UPL UPL Abies fraseri (Pursh) Poir. FACU FACU FACU Abies grandis (Dougl. ex D. Don) Lindl. FACU-* NI FACU-* Abies lasiocarpa (Hook.) Nutt. NI NI FACU+ FACU- FACU FAC UPL UPL,FAC Abies magnifica A. Murr. NI UPL NI FACU UPL,FACU Abildgaardia ovata (Burm. f.) Kral FACW+ FAC+ FAC+,FACW+ Abutilon theophrasti Medik. UPL FACU- FACU- UPL UPL UPL UPL UPL NI NI UPL,FACU- Acacia choriophylla Benth. FAC* FAC* Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd. FACU NI NI* NI NI FACU Acacia greggii Gray UPL UPL FACU FACU UPL,FACU Acacia macracantha Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd. NI FAC FAC Acacia minuta ssp. minuta (M.E. Jones) Beauchamp FACU FACU Acaena exigua Gray OBL OBL Acalypha bisetosa Bertol. ex Spreng. FACW FACW Acalypha virginica L. FACU- FACU- FAC- FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acalypha virginica var. rhomboidea (Raf.) Cooperrider FACU- FAC- FACU FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acanthocereus tetragonus (L.) Humm. FAC* NI NI FAC* Acanthomintha ilicifolia (Gray) Gray FAC* FAC* Acanthus ebracteatus Vahl OBL OBL Acer circinatum Pursh FAC- FAC NI FAC-,FAC Acer glabrum Torr. FAC FAC FAC FACU FACU* FAC FACU FACU*,FAC Acer grandidentatum Nutt.
    [Show full text]
  • Monocotyledons and Gymnosperms of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands
    SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Contributions from the United States National Herbarium Volume 52: 1-415 Monocotyledons and Gymnosperms of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands Editors Pedro Acevedo-Rodríguez and Mark T. Strong Department of Botany National Museum of Natural History Washington, DC 2005 ABSTRACT Acevedo-Rodríguez, Pedro and Mark T. Strong. Monocots and Gymnosperms of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Contributions from the United States National Herbarium, volume 52: 415 pages (including 65 figures). The present treatment constitutes an updated revision for the monocotyledon and gymnosperm flora (excluding Orchidaceae and Poaceae) for the biogeographical region of Puerto Rico (including all islets and islands) and the Virgin Islands. With this contribution, we fill the last major gap in the flora of this region, since the dicotyledons have been previously revised. This volume recognizes 33 families, 118 genera, and 349 species of Monocots (excluding the Orchidaceae and Poaceae) and three families, three genera, and six species of gymnosperms. The Poaceae with an estimated 89 genera and 265 species, will be published in a separate volume at a later date. When Ackerman’s (1995) treatment of orchids (65 genera and 145 species) and the Poaceae are added to our account of monocots, the new total rises to 35 families, 272 genera and 759 species. The differences in number from Britton’s and Wilson’s (1926) treatment is attributed to changes in families, generic and species concepts, recent introductions, naturalization of introduced species and cultivars, exclusion of cultivated plants, misdeterminations, and discoveries of new taxa or new distributional records during the last seven decades.
    [Show full text]
  • US EPA-Pesticides; Dodine
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON D.C., 20460 OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDESDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES PC Code: 044301 DP Barcode: D338148 Date: January 22, 2008 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Ecological Risk Assessment for the Dodine Section 3 New Use on Peanuts and Bananas TO: Robert Westin, Product Manager Mary Waller, Team Leader Registration Division (7505P) FROM: Christopher J. Salice, P.h.D, Biologist Marietta Echeverria, Envronmental Scientist Environmental Risk Branch IV Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P) REVIEWED BY: Thomas Steeger, Ph.D., Senior Biologist R. David Jones, Ph.D., Senior Agronomist Environmental Risk Branch IV Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P) APPROVED BY: Elizabeth Behl, Branch Chief Environmental Risk Branch IV Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P) The Environmental Fate and Effects Division (EFED) has reviewed the proposed label for the use of dodine (n-dodecylguanidine monoacetate; CAS 2439-10-3) and its end-use product SYLLIT® FL (39.6% dodine) fungicide on peanuts and bananas. The results of this screening-level risk assessment indicate that the proposed new uses of dodine on peanuts and bananas have the potential for direct adverse effects on listed and non-listed freshwater and estuarine/marine invertebrates, listed and non-listed vascular and non-vascular plants, and listed and non-listed birds and mammals. Major data gaps are listed below. Without these data potential risk to the associated taxa can not be precluded: • Aquatic vascular plant toxicity data (850.4400) There is uncertainty regarding the potential chronic effects of dodine to saltwater invertebrates and fish since there are no toxicity data. Using acute-to-chronic ratios (ACR) from freshwater species to calculate chronic endpoints for the saltwater species, however, suggests that risks may be low.
    [Show full text]
  • An Inconceivable Indigeneity: the Historical, Cultural, and Interactional Dimensions of Puerto Rican Taíno Activism
    An Inconceivable Indigeneity: The Historical, Cultural, and Interactional Dimensions of Puerto Rican Taíno Activism by Sherina Feliciano-Santos A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Anthropology) in the University of Michigan 2011 Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Barbra A. Meek, Chair Professor Bruce Mannheim Professor Judith T. Irvine Professor Ruth Behar Associate Professor Lawrence M. La Fountain-Stokes © Sherina Feliciano-Santos 2011 DEDICATION Para Mami y Daddy Por el apoyo incondicional y por siempre creer en mi, aún cuando a mi misma se me hacía díficil. Por ser modelos de humanidad e integridad. Por ser mis padres, los quiero. También a Abuelito, Porque fuiste ejemplo y siempre te llevaré conmigo. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Five years ago, in a meeting to talk about my final paper proposal on Jibaridad in Puerto Rico, Tom Trautmann asked if there were any indigenous movements in the Island. After a responding with a resolute ―NO,‖ I thought about it and remembered that the prior summer I had read an article in a newspaper about a group of people claiming to be Taíno protesting the management of the Caguana ceremonial site in Utuado, PR. It was this question and my own response to it, which led to the questions that would ultimately inform this dissertation project. For asking that initial question, I want to thank Tom Trautmann. Barb Meek has been an exceptional teacher, mentor, advisor, and friend. During my many years at Michigan, Barb guided me in thinking about language, indigeneity, field methods, and analysis. I feel deeply fortunate to have had her exceptional input and her unwavering support throughout my graduate student career.
    [Show full text]
  • Certified Nursery
    CERTIFIED NURSERY Floribunda Palms and Exotics #BRN: 0120 Hawaiian Acres Road 10 Mt. View, HI 96771 VALID FROM YEAR: 2021 Contact: Jeff Marcus PHONE: (808) 966-8003 Date Inspected: 7/28/2020 Island: Hawaii Date Inventory Reviewed: 10/21/2020 Plant Genus Pot Sizes Acanthophoenix crinita Seedling, 4", 1 Gallon, 3 Gallon Acanthophoenix rubra Seedling, 4", 1 Gallon, 3 Gallon Acoelorraphe wrightii Seedling, 4", 1 Gallon, 3 Gallon Actinokentia divaricata Seedling, 4", 1 Gallon, 3 Gallon Aiphanes erosa Seedling, 4", 1 Gallon, 3 Gallon Allagoptera arenaria Seedling, 4", 1 Gallon, 3 Gallon Allagoptera leucocalyx Seedling, 4", 1 Gallon, 3 Gallon Anthurium clavigerum Seedling, 4", 1 Gallon, 3 Gallon Anthurium decipiens Seedling, 4", 1 Gallon, 3 Gallon Anthurium hookeri Seedling, 4", 1 Gallon, 3 Gallon Anthurium pseudospectabile Seedling, 4", 1 Gallon, 3 Gallon Anthurium trilobum Seedling, 4", 1 Gallon, 3 Gallon Anthurium veitchii Seedling, 4", 1 Gallon, 3 Gallon Archontophoenix cunninghamiana v. Illiwara Seedling, 4", 1 Gallon, 3 Gallon Archontophoenix maxima Seedling, 4", 1 Gallon, 3 Gallon Archontophoenix myolensis Seedling, 4", 1 Gallon, 3 Gallon Archontophoenix purpurea Seedling, 4", 1 Gallon, 3 Gallon Archontophoenix tuckerii Seedling, 4", 1 Gallon, 3 Gallon Areca catechu Seedling, 4", 1 Gallon, 3 Gallon Areca guppyana Seedling, 4", 1 Gallon, 3 Gallon Areca hutchinsoniana Seedling, 4", 1 Gallon, 3 Gallon Areca latiloba Seedling, 4", 1 Gallon, 3 Gallon Areca macrocalyx (red crownshaft) Seedling, 4", 1 Gallon, 3 Gallon Areca macrocarpa Seedling,
    [Show full text]
  • Puerto Rico Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy 2005
    Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy Puerto Rico PUERTO RICO COMPREHENSIVE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION STRATEGY 2005 Miguel A. García José A. Cruz-Burgos Eduardo Ventosa-Febles Ricardo López-Ortiz ii Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy Puerto Rico ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Financial support for the completion of this initiative was provided to the Puerto Rico Department of Natural and Environmental Resources (DNER) by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Federal Assistance Office. Special thanks to Mr. Michael L. Piccirilli, Ms. Nicole Jiménez-Cooper, Ms. Emily Jo Williams, and Ms. Christine Willis from the USFWS, Region 4, for their support through the preparation of this document. Thanks to the colleagues that participated in the Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy (CWCS) Steering Committee: Mr. Ramón F. Martínez, Mr. José Berríos, Mrs. Aida Rosario, Mr. José Chabert, and Dr. Craig Lilyestrom for their collaboration in different aspects of this strategy. Other colleagues from DNER also contributed significantly to complete this document within the limited time schedule: Ms. María Camacho, Mr. Ramón L. Rivera, Ms. Griselle Rodríguez Ferrer, Mr. Alberto Puente, Mr. José Sustache, Ms. María M. Santiago, Mrs. María de Lourdes Olmeda, Mr. Gustavo Olivieri, Mrs. Vanessa Gautier, Ms. Hana Y. López-Torres, Mrs. Carmen Cardona, and Mr. Iván Llerandi-Román. Also, special thanks to Mr. Juan Luis Martínez from the University of Puerto Rico, for designing the cover of this document. A number of collaborators participated in earlier revisions of this CWCS: Mr. Fernando Nuñez-García, Mr. José Berríos, Dr. Craig Lilyestrom, Mr. Miguel Figuerola and Mr. Leopoldo Miranda. A special recognition goes to the authors and collaborators of the supporting documents, particularly, Regulation No.
    [Show full text]
  • To See Our Puerto Rico Vacation Planning
    DISCOVER PUERTO RICO LEISURE + TRAVEL 2021 Puerto Rico Vacation Planning Guide 1 IT’S TIME TO PLAN FOR PUERTO RICO! It’s time for deep breaths and even deeper dives. For simple pleasures, dramatic sunsets and numerous ways to surround yourself with nature. It’s time for warm welcomes and ice-cold piña coladas. As a U.S. territory, Puerto Rico offers the allure of an exotic locale with a rich, vibrant culture and unparalleled natural offerings, without needing a passport or currency exchange. Accessibility to the Island has never been easier, with direct flights from domestic locations like New York, Charlotte, Dallas, and Atlanta, to name a few. Lodging options range from luxurious beachfront resorts to magical historic inns, and everything in between. High standards of health and safety have been implemented throughout the Island, including local measures developed by the Puerto Rico Tourism Company (PRTC), alongside U.S. Travel Association (USTA) guidelines. Outdoor adventures will continue to be an attractive alternative for visitors looking to travel safely. Home to one of the world’s largest dry forests, the only tropical rainforest in the U.S. National Forest System, hundreds of underground caves, 18 golf courses and so much more, Puerto Rico delivers profound outdoor experiences, like kayaking the iridescent Bioluminescent Bay or zip lining through a canopy of emerald green to the sound of native coquí tree frogs. The culture is equally impressive, steeped in European architecture, eclectic flavors of Spanish, Taino and African origins and a rich history – and welcomes visitors with genuine, warm Island hospitality. Explore the authentic local cuisine, the beat of captivating music and dance, and the bustling nightlife, which blended together, create a unique energy you won’t find anywhere else.
    [Show full text]