DOCSLIB.ORG

North Slope Borough Comprehensive Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
North Slope Borough Comprehensive Plan North Slope Borough Comprehensive Plan August 25, 1993 Return comments to: Kirk Wickersham Attorney at Law Planning Consultant 3111 C Street, Suite 200 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Draft North Slope Borough Comprehensive Plan Table of Contents CHAPTER\. BOUNDARlliSANDLANDSTATUS 1.1 Introduction 1 \.2 Land Use 2 1.3 Land Status 2 1.4 Land Management Programs 3 1.4.1 Federal management 3 1.4.2 State Management 6 1.4.3 Arctic Slope Regional Corporation Management 7 1.4.4 North Slope Borough Management 7 1.5 References 8 CHAPTER 2. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT 9 2.1 Introduction 9 2.2 Water Resources 10 2.2.1 Surface Water 11 2.2.2 Distribution of Runoff 12 2.2.3 Water Quality 12 2.2.4 Sediment 13 2.2.5 Groundwater and Pennafrost 14 2.2.6 Domestic Consumption 15 2.2.7 Industrial Areas (Prudhoe Bay) 16 2.2.8 Water Related Development Issues 16 2.3 Air Quality 16 2.3.1 Nitrogen Oxides 17 2.3.2 Sulphur Dioxide 17 2.3.3 Ozone 17 2.3.4 Carbon Monoxide 18 2.3.5 Hydrocarbons 18 2.3.6 Total Suspended Particulates 18 2.4 Noise Analysis 19 2.5 Other Pollutants 19 2.6 Beach Erosion 20 2.7 Offshore Environmental Hazards 20 2.7.1 Sea Ice IInpacts 21 2.7.2 Wave Erosion 21 2.8 Onshore Environmental Hazards 22 2.8.1 Flooding : 22 2.8.2 Pennafrost 22 2.8.3 High Winds 22 2.8.4 Subsea Pennafrost 22 2.8.5 Seismic Activity 22 2.8.6 Soil Erosion 23 2.8.7 Topographic Hazards 23 2.9 References 24 CHAPTER 3. SUBSISTENCE AND BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 3.1 Introduction 31 3.2 Subsistence 31 3.2.1 Impacting Factors 33 3.3 Subsistence Resources 33 3.3.1 Large Terrestrial Mammals 33 3.3.2 Small Furbearing Mammals 34 3.3.3 Marine Mammals 34 3.3.4 Birds 35 3.3.5 Bird Eggs - Mannich 35 3.3.6 Invertebrates 36 3.3.7 Fish 36 3.3.8 Berries 37 3.3.9 Greens and Roots 37 3.3.10 Forest Vegetation 37 3.4 Distribution and Special Habitat 38 3.4.1 Large Terrestrial Mammals 38 3.4.2 Furbearers 41 3.4.3 Marine Manunals 42 3.4.4 Freshwaler Fisheries 45 3.4.5 Birds 47 3.4.6 Threatened and Endangered Plants 50 3.5 References 51 CHAPTER 4. INUPIAT mSTORY AND CULTURE 4.1 Introduction 63 4.2 Pre-Contact and History 63 4.3 Cultural and Archaeological Resources 70 4.4 Threats to Cultural Resources 72 4.5 The Commission on I_upiat History, Language and Culture 74 4.6 References 76 CHAPTER 5. SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC FACTORS 5.1 Introduction 87 5.2 EmpIoymenUincome 88 5.2.1 Expansion of the Labor Force 90 5.2.2 CupiatINon-Cupiat Employment 90 5.3 Cost of Living 91 5.4 Housing 92 5.5 Economic Development 93 5.6 Communications 94 5.7 Tourism 97 5.7.1 Packaged Tours 97 5.7.2 Outdoor lourist activities 98 5.7.3 Sport Hunting and Fishing 100 5.7.4 Winter Activities 101 5.7.5 Other Activilies 102 5.7.6 Haul RoadConidor 102 5.8 Health 101 5:8.1 Recent Improvements in Native Health 103 5.8.2 Control of Infectious Disease 103 5.8.3 Sexually Transmitted Diseases 104 5.8.4 Adolescent Pregnancy 104 5.8.5 Alcoholism and Alcohol-Related Injuries 105 5.8.6 Causes of Death in the Borough 105 5.8.7 Infant Mortality 106 5.8.8 Causes of Hospitalization 106 5.8.9 Outpatient Treatment 105 5.8.10 Other Health Concerns 105 5.9 Recreation 106 5.10 References __ 107 CHAPTER 6. TRANSPORTATION 6.1 Introduction III 6.2 Air Transportation 111 6.3 Land Transportation 112 6.3.1 Community Transportation 112 6.3.2 Prudhoe BaylDeadhorse 113 6.3.3 Haul Road 114 6.3.4 Traditional and Off-Road Routes 115 6.3.5 Gates of the Arctic 115 6.3.6 Oil Pipelines 116 6.3.7 Constraints of Seasonal Land and Snow Availability 116 6.4 Water Transportation 116 6.4.1 Ice Breaking Tankers 117 6.4.2 Petroleum Development 117 6.5 References 119 CHAPTER 7. OIL, GAS AND MINERAL DEVELOPMENT 7.1 Introduction 121 7.2 Petroleum Development 122 7.2.1 History of Petroleum Development 122 7.2.2 Exploration 123 7.2.3 Production 125 7.2.4 Infrastructure And Logistics 126 7.2.5 Environmental Impacts 126 7.2.6 Construction 138 7.2.7 Off-Road Travel And Marine Transportation 140 7.2.8 Oil Drilling 141 7.2.9 Rehabilitation And Cleanup 141 7.2.10 North Slope Oil Production 132 7.2.11 Federal Leasing Programs 135 7.2.12 State Leasing Program 137 7.3 Natural Gas 149 7.4 Coal 137 7.5 Sand and Gravel 152 7.6 Other Minerals 154 7.7 Facility Siting 140 7.8 References : 141 CHAPTER 8. GOVERNMENT 8.1 Introduction 159 8.2 Finances 160 8.2.1 Revenue 160 8.2.2 Revenue Forecasts 161 8.2.3 Operating Budget 162 8.2.4 Capital Improvements Program 163 8.3 Borough Government Services 167 8.3.1 Department of Administration and Finance 168 8.3.2 ClPM Department 168 8.3.3 Department of Planning and Community Services 168 8.3.4 Departmcntof Municipal Services 169 8.3.5 Department of Industrial Development 170 8.3.6 Departments of Public Safety, Fire and Search & Rescue 171 8.3.7 Department of Heallh and Social Services 171 8.4 Education 172 8.4.1 North Slope Borough School District 172 8.4.2 Arctic Sivunmum llisagvik College 174 8.5 Barrow Water and Sewer 174 8.6 Municipal Recreation Powers 156 8.7 Hospital 175 8.8 Housing 176 8.9 Governmental Cooperation - Private Development 176 8.10 Intergovernmental Coordination 176 8.11 References 176 CHAPTER 9. COMMUNITIES 9.1 Anaktuvuk Pass 179 9.1.1 History 179 9.1.2 Subsistence 180 9.1.3 Social Characteristics 181 9.1.4 Existing Public Facilities 181 9.1.5 Capital Improvement Projects in Progress 182 9.1.6 Future Capital Improvement Projects 182 9.2 Atqasuk 182 9.2.1 History 182 9.2.2 Subsistence 184 9.2.3 Social Characteristics 185 9.2.4 Existing North Slope Borough Public Facilities 186 9.2.5 Capital Improvement Projects in Progress 186 9.2.6 Future Capital Improvement Projects 187 9.3 Barrow 187 9.3.1 History 187 9.3.2 Subsistence 189 9.3.3 Social Characteristics 192 9.3.4 Existing North Slope Borough Public Facilities 193 9.3.5 Ongoing Capital Improvement Projects 194 9.3.6 Future Capital Improvement Projects 194 9.3 KaklOvik195 9.3.1 History 195 9.3.2 Subsistence 196 9.3.3 Social Characteristics 199 9.3.4 Existing North Slope Borough Public Facilities 199 9.3.5 Capital Improvement Projects in Progress 200 9.3.6 Future Capital Improvement Projects 200 9.4 Nuiqsut 200 9.4.1 History 200 9.4.2 Subsistence 201 9.4.3 Social Characteristics 203 9.4.4 Existing North Slope Borough Public Facilities 204 9.4.5 Capital Improvement Projects in Progress 204 9.4.6 Future Capital Improvement Projects 204 9.5 Point Hope 205 9.5.1 History 205 9.5.2 Subsistence 207 9.5.3 Social Characterisitics 210 9.5.4 Existing North Slope Borough Public Facilities 211 9.5.5 Capital Improvement Projects in Progress 211 9.5.6 Future Capital Improvement Projects 212 9.6 Pl. Lay 212 9.6.1 History 212 9.6.2 Subsistence 214 9.6.3 Social Characteristics 216 9.6.4 Existing North Slope Borough Public Facilities 217 9.6.5 Capital Improvement Projects in Progress 217 9.6.6 Future Capital Improvement Projects 218 9.7 Wainv.rright 218 9.7.1 History 218 9.7.2 Subsistence 221 9.7.3 Social Characteristics 223 9.7.4 Existing North Slope Borough Public Facilities 223 9.7.5 Capital Improvement Projects in Progress 224 9.7.6 Future Capital Improvement Projects 224 INTRODUCTION TO THE 1993 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN "I want you to stop offshore oil exploration which keeps us from taking bowhead whales. We want to be able to develop oil onshore and on OUf own lands in ANWR." Jacob Adams, NSB Assembly Member "That is exactly the opposite of current federal policy." Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of the Interior. August 1993. The Borough has had a Comprehensive Plan and Land Management Regulations since late 1982. The three volumes which comprise the 1993 Comprehensive Plan build upon that work Clod provide updated data and policy. The purpose of a comprehensive plan to provide for the orderly development of the Borough and to promote the health, safety and welfare of its residents. This Comprehensive Plan, as the 1982 Comprehensive Plan, accomplishes that by identifying and discussing the impacts of development, both good and bad. Its aim is to gain for the Borough and its residents as many of the good impacts as possible and avoid or eliminate as many of the bad impacts as possible. What a "good" impact is and what a "bad" impact is varies from community to community all across the world. Within each community what is good and what is bad will vary from one area to the next and with the passage of time.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Conditional Probabilities for the Beaufort Sea Planning Area
    OCS Report BOEM 2020-003 Oil Spill Risk Analysis: Conditional Probabilities for the Beaufort Sea Planning Area US Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Headquarters This page intentionally left blank. OCS Report BOEM 2020-003 Oil Spill Risk Analysis: Conditional Probabilities for the Beaufort Sea Planning Area January 2020 Authors: Zhen Li Caryn Smith In-House Document by U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Division of Environmental Sciences Sterling, VA US Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Headquarters This page intentionally left blank. REPORT AVAILABILITY To download a PDF file of this report, go to the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Oil Spill Risk Analysis web page (https://www.boem.gov/environment/environmental- assessment/oil-spill-risk-analysis-reports). CITATION Li Z, Smith C. 2020. Oil Spill Risk Analysis: Conditional Probabilities for the Beaufort Sea Planning Area. Sterling (VA): U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. OCS Report BOEM 2020-003. 130 p. ABOUT THE COVER This graphic depicts the study area in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas and boundary segments used in the oil spill risk analysis model for the the Beaufort Sea Planning Area. Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................... i List of Figures ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Satellite Tracking of Bowhead Whales
    _______________ OCS Study BOEM 2013-01110 Satellite Tracking of Bowhead Whales Movements and Analysis from 2006 to 2012 Final Report U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Alaska Region www.boem.gov OCS Study BOEM 2013-01110 _______________ OCS Study BOEM 2013-01110 Prepared under BOEM Contract M10PC00085 ii Satellite Tracking of Bowhead Whales: Movements and Analysis from 2006 to 2012 Authors Lori T. Quakenbush Robert J. Small John J. Citta Prepared under BOEM Contract M10PC00085 by Alaska Department of Fish and Game P.O. Box 25526 Juneau, Alaska 99802-5526 Published by U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Anchorage, Alaska Alaska Outer Continental Shelf Region August 2013 iii DISCLAIMER This report was prepared under contract between the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) and the Alaska Department of Fish and Game. This report has been technically reviewed by BOEM, and it has been approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of BOEM, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. It is, however, exempt from review and compliance with BOEM editorial standards. REPORT AVAILABILITY This report may be downloaded from the boem.gov website through the Environmental Studies Program Information System (ESPIS) by referencing OCS Study BOEM 2013-01110. It is also available from the Alaska Department of Fish and Game website adfg.alaska.gov. You will be able to obtain this report also from the National Technical Information Service in the near future.
    [Show full text]
  • Satellite Tracking of Bowhead Whales
    _______________ OCS Study BOEM 2013-01110 Satellite Tracking of Bowhead Whales Movements and Analysis from 2006 to 2012 Final Report U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Alaska Region www.boem.gov OCS Study BOEM 2013-01110 _______________ OCS Study BOEM 2013-01110 Prepared under BOEM Contract M10PC00085 ii Satellite Tracking of Bowhead Whales: Movements and Analysis from 2006 to 2012 Authors Lori T. Quakenbush Robert J. Small John J. Citta Prepared under BOEM Contract M10PC00085 by Alaska Department of Fish and Game P.O. Box 25526 Juneau, Alaska 99802-5526 Published by U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Anchorage, Alaska Alaska Outer Continental Shelf Region August 2013 iii DISCLAIMER This report was prepared under contract between the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) and the Alaska Department of Fish and Game. This report has been technically reviewed by BOEM, and it has been approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of BOEM, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. It is, however, exempt from review and compliance with BOEM editorial standards. REPORT AVAILABILITY This report may be downloaded from the boem.gov website through the Environmental Studies Program Information System (ESPIS) by referencing OCS Study BOEM 2013-01110. It is also available from the Alaska Department of Fish and Game website adfg.alaska.gov. You will be able to obtain this report also from the National Technical Information Service in the near future.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaktovik Comprehensive Development Plan
    Kaktovik Comprehensive Development Plan Final Draft December 2014 Department of Planning and Community Services North Slope Borough Charlotte Brower, Mayor iii | P a g e Kaktovik Comprehensive Development Plan Final Draft December 2014 Community Planning and Development Division Department of Planning and Community Services North Slope Borough North Slope Borough Charlotte Brower, Mayor KAKTOVIK COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN – DECEMBER 2014 iv | P a g e KAKTOVIK COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN – DECEMBER 2014 v | P a g e Kaktovik Comprehensive Development Plan Final Draft December 2014 City of Kaktovik Resolution #14-04, November 11, 2014 North Slope Borough Planning Commission Resolution #__, December 18, 2014 Assembly Ordinance #__ Prepared by the Community Planning and Development Division Department of Planning & Community Services North Slope Borough Charlotte Brower, Mayor NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH KAKTOVIK COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN – DECEMBER 2014 vi | P a g e Assembly Forrest Olemaun, President (Barrow) Mike Aamodt, Vice President (Barrow) Herbert Kinneeveauk Jr. (Point Hope & Point Lay) John Hopson Jr., (Wainwright & Atqasuk) Doreen Lampe (Barrow) Vernon Edwardsen (Barrow) Duane Hopson, Sr. (Nuiqsut, Kaktovik, Anaktuvuk Pass, & Deadhorse) Planning Commission Paul Bodfish, Chair (Atqasuk) Lawrence Burris, (Anaktuvuk Pass) Richard Glenn (Barrow) Daisy Sage (Pt. Hope) Eli Nukapigak (Nuiqsut) Matthew Rexford (Kaktovik) Willard Neakok (Point Lay) Raymond Aguvluk (Wainwright) Kaktovik City Council Nora Jane Burns, Mayor Fenton Rexford
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Storm Conditions in Response to Projected 21St
    Prepared in cooperation with and funded in part by the Arctic Landscape Conservation Cooperation (ALCC) Changing Storm Conditions in Response to Projected 21st Century Climate Change and the Potential Impact on an Arctic Barrier Island–Lagoon System—A Pilot Study for Arey Island and Lagoon, Eastern Arctic Alaska Open-File Report 2020–1142 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: View from the western end of Barter Island looking southeast toward Arey Lagoon. Image and other oblique images of the North Slope of Alaska are available for download at http://pubs.usgs. gov/ds/436/ (Gibbs and Richmond, 2009). Changing Storm Conditions in Response to Projected 21st Century Climate Change and the Potential Impact on an Arctic Barrier Island–Lagoon System—A Pilot Study for Arey Island and Lagoon, Eastern Arctic Alaska By Li H. Erikson, Ann E. Gibbs, Bruce M. Richmond, Curt D. Storlazzi, Ben M. Jones, and Karin A. Ohman Prepared in cooperation with and funded in part by the Arctic Landscape Conservation Cooperation (ALCC) Open-File Report 2020–1142 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey James F. Reilly II, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2020 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov.
    [Show full text]
  • Subsistence Land Use and Place Names Maps for Kaktovik, Alaska
    SUBSISTENCE LAND USE AND PLACE NAMES MAPS FOR KAKTOVIK, ALASKA Sverre Pedersen Michael Coffing Jane Thompson Technical Paper No. 109 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Subsistence Fairbanks, Alaska December, 1985 ABSTRACT This study focuses on the spatial dimensions of land use associated with the procurement of wild resources by residents of Kaktovik, Alaska. Land use mapping with members of 21 households produced 33 map biographies, 15 community map biographies, and 3 summary maps covering the time span from about 1923 to 1983. Additionally, 188 place names of significance to Kaktovik residents were recorded and geographically located. Kaktovik subsistence land uses in Alaska cover a minimum area of 11,406 square miles, stretching from the United States and Canadian border in the east to within 20 miles of the Colville River in the west, a linear distance of 200 miles. The resource use area spans about 25 miles northward into the Beaufort Sea from Kaktovik and extends about 85 miles inland to the continental divide of the Brooks Range in the eastern Arctic. Virtually all community-based subsistence activity takes place within the confines of this area. In certain areas more than one resource use activity occurs. Land use activities by Kaktovik residents are associated with efforts to harvest a wide variety of locally available resources which are shared throughout the community. Use areas may differ between households but all households share common use areas. One hundred sixty-seven Inupiat place names were recorded for the Kaktovik area. Distribution of the place names firmly supports the initial finding that the community's overall subsistence land use area is extensive.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaktovik Subsistence
    • Kaktovik Subsistence Land Use Values through Time in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Area - ' by Michael J. Jacobson Cynthia Wentworth U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Northern Alaska Ecological Services 1982 Kaktovik Subsistence LAND USE VALUES THROUGH TIME IN THE ARCTIC NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE AREA NAES 82-01 Kaktovik Subsistence LAND USE VALUES THROUGH TIME IN THE ARCTIC NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE AREA by Michael J. Jacobson Cynthia Wentworth Kaktovik Resource Specialists: Nora and George Agiak Mae Agiak Kaveolook Eunice Agiak Sims Herman Aishanna Isaac and Mary Sirak Akootchook George Akootchook Jane Akootchook Thompson Olive Gordon Anderson Betty and Archie Koonneak Brower Tommy Uiiiiiiq Gordon Alfred and Ruby Linn Herman and Mildred Rexford U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Northern Alaska Ecological Services 101 12th Avenue, Fairbanks, Alaska 99701 1982 CONTENTS Foreward .................. i Acknowledgements Introduction .. iii 1. Subsistence Setting . .v . .................. 2. History of Kaktovik . 1 . " . 3 3. Traditional Land Use Inventory Sites . .... .7 4. Land Use Patterns Over Time. .... 15 5. The Land and the Subsistence Economic System . ........ 21 6. Yearly Cycle . .. 29 7. Resources Harvested . .. 35 8. Future Studies and Recommmendations .. ......................... 69 Appendix 1. Genealogy ............................................. 71 Appendix 2. The Reindeer Era . .79 Appendix 3. Traditional Land Use Inventory Sites. .................... 85 Appendix 4. Individual Histories and Residence Chronologies ............... 121 Appendix 5. Muskox. .. 137 Literature Cited .......... .................. 139 Cover photo: Tents along the Sadlerochit River (M. Jacobson). Book design by Visible Ink, Anchorage, Alaska. LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Population from Brownlow Point to Demarcation Point ............... 7 Table 2. Traditional Land Use Inventory Sites in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge ........................... 8 Table 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Shoreline Change Along the North Coast of Alaska, US
    National Assessment of Shoreline Change— Historical Shoreline Change Along the North Coast of Alaska, U.S.-Canadian Border to Icy Cape Open-File Report 2015–1048 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Oblique aerial photograph at Flaxman Island showing tapped and untapped thermokarst lakes, caribou tracks, narrow beaches, and bluff failures along the coast. Image taken August 9, 2006. National Assessment of Shoreline Change— Historical Shoreline Change along the North Coast of Alaska, U.S.–Canadian Border to Icy Cape By Ann E. Gibbs and Bruce M. Richmond Open–File Report 2015–1048 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2015 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS (1–888–275–8747). For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Gibbs, A.E., and Richmond, B.M., 2015, National assessment of shoreline change—Historical shoreline change along the north coast of Alaska, U.S.–Canadian border to Icy Cape: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaktovik Comprehensive Development Plan – July 2014 Draft
    ii | Page KAKTOVIK COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN – JULY 2014 DRAFT iii | Page Kaktovik Comprehensive Development Plan Public Review Draft July 2014 Community Planning Division Department of Planning and Community Services North Slope Borough North Slope Borough Charlotte Brower, Mayor KAKTOVIK COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN – JULY 2014 DRAFT iv | Page KAKTOVIK COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN – JULY 2014 DRAFT v | Page Kaktovik Comprehensive Development Plan Public Review Draft July 2014 Adopted [DATE] City of Kaktovik Resolution # Assembly Ordinance # Prepared by the Community Planning Division Department of Planning & Community Services North Slope Borough Charlotte Brower, Mayor NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH KAKTOVIK COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN – JULY 2014 DRAFT vi | Page Assembly Mike Aamodt, President (Barrow) Forrest Olemaun, Vice-President (Barrow) Herbert Kinneeveauk, Jr. (Point Hope & Point Lay) John Hopson, Jr, (Wainwright & Atqasuk) Doreen Lampe (Barrow) Vernon Edwardsen (Barrow) Duane Hopson, Sr. (Nuiqsut, Kaktovik, Anaktuvuk Pass, & Deadhorse) Planning Commission Paul Bodfish, Chair (Atqasuk) Lawrence Burris, (Anaktuvuk Pass) Richard Glenn (Barrow) Daisy Sage (Pt. Hope) Eli Nukapigak (Nuiqsut) Matthew Rexford (Kaktovik) Willard Neakok (Point Lay) Raymond Aguvluk (Wainwright) Department of Planning & Community Services Rhoda Ahmaogak, Director Wiley Contrades, Deputy Director Arnold Brower, Deputy Director Community Planning Division Robert Shears KAKTOVIK COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN – JULY 2014 DRAFT vii | Page Kaktovik Comprehensive Development Plan Acknowledgements Many individuals and organizations participated in the several-year effort to revise the Kaktovik Comprehensive Development Plan. The community review organizations deserve a special thank you for their efforts in providing information for the plan: City of Kaktovik, Native Village of Kaktovik, Kaktovik Iñupiat Corporation, Harold Kaveolook School Advisory Committee, North Slope Borough School District, NSB Departments, Ilisagvik College, and NSB Commission on History, Language & Culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Barrier Island-Lagoon System Response to Arctic
    Arctic LCC Progress Report 1. PROJECT INFORMATION Title: Modeling arctic barrier island-lagoon system response to projected arctic warming Report period July 1 to December 31 Report submission date February 3, 2012; revised final submitted June 22, 2012 Author of Report Erikson, L.H., Gibbs, A.E., Richmond B.M., Storlazzi, C.D., Jones, B.M. Principal Investigator(s), Co-Principal Investigators and Recipient Organization(s): Bruce M. Richmond, Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center (PCMSC) at USGS, [email protected] Li H. Erikson, PCMSC, USGS, [email protected] Ann Gibbs, PCMSC, USGS, [email protected] Curt Storlazzi, PCMSC, USGS, [email protected] Benjamin Jones, Alaska Science Center, USGS, [email protected] Philip Martin, US Fish & Wildlife Service, [email protected] 2. PROJECT OVERVIEW a. Briefly (4-5 sentences) describe both the research purpose and the underlying need for this research. Changes in Arctic coastal ecosystems in response to global warming may be some of the most severe on the planet. A better understanding and analysis of the rates at which these changes are expected to occur over the coming decades is crucial in order to delineate high-priority areas that are likely to be affected by climate changes. In this study we investigate the likelihood of changes to habitat-supporting barrier island – lagoon systems in response to projected changes in atmospheric and oceanographic forcing associated with Arctic warming. To better understand the relative importance of processes responsible for the current and future coastal landscape, key parameters related to increasing arctic temperatures are investigated and used to establish boundary conditions for models that simulate barrier island migration and inundation of deltaic deposits and low-lying tundra.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaktovik Subsistence LAND USE VALUES THROUGH TIME in the ARCTIC NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE AREA
    Kaktovik Subsistence Land Use Values through Time in the - "~" -'.~ Arctic National. Wildlife Refuge. Area. '0' _:: . :.,- .. : • ::1: -,' -:..:~ "', ...~ g-:?:..:.:~~ .". .~__ 7~_';~;~:~.\~~: rr========'='"'="-==-,="'=-=-,,,=-"'=="='==;] '"";t£i~ -/:: ~::::':::::;'::'­ ~:-;' -:~~:?! :-:~ ",: ....... .. - :' j~~~li.~ .. "_........" ..•., c _-.•,­ ·:~~~;f~ft:· ',:'-~~ .-:'~'';;.~'' ' :'"'",. -, ..",...... • ~:_., •• _. _'0 , -, .:':'Ef?"t-:;-.: "-~~ '. :..:..•• ~~ :0,:. "":"... ...OOC' ': ;;:~~~ ;~~~~~f ·~-_r..~ :.-~ ,~:..~,~, .~~: ~-s;;> ."'- :;~T' ",.-, --: , :',~ 0' __ '".. ' -./- ,.~~>;- '1 ;: <. ,.; :.-. NAES 82-01 Kaktovik Subsistence LAND USE VALUES THROUGH TIME IN THE ARCTIC NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE AREA I . i by Michael J. Jacobson Cynthia Wentworth Kaktovik Resource Specialists: Nora and George Agiak Mae Agiak Kaveolook Eunice Agiak Sims Herman Aishanna Isaac and Mary Sirak Akootchook George Akootchook Jane Akootchaok Thompson Olive Gordon Anderson Betty and Archie Koonneak Brower Tommy Uii'ii'iiq Gordon Alfred and RUby Linn Herman and Mildred Rexford u.s. Fish and Wildli1e Service Northern Alaska Ecological Services 101 12th Avenue. Fairbanks, Alaska 99701 1982 CONTENTS I Foreward . .•. 1 Acknowledgements .. iii Introduction ,... .. _ v 1. Subsistence Setting. , .1 2. Hlslory of Kaktovik. .. .. .3 3. Traditronal Land Use Inventory Sites . .7 4. Land Usa Patterns Over Time. ......,. .15 5. The Land and the Subsistence Economic System ........21 6. Yearly Cycle _. ._ ..29 7. Resources Harvested _. .... 35 8. Future Studies and
    [Show full text]
  • USGS ARCTIC NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE FIELD SUMMARY, 1995-1997 by Christopher J
    Chapter FS (Field Studies, 1995-1997) USGS ARCTIC NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE FIELD SUMMARY, 1995-1997 by Christopher J. Schenk1, David W. Houseknecht2, and Robert C. Burruss3 in The Oil and Gas Resource Potential of the 1002 Area, Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, Alaska, by ANWR Assessment Team, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 98-34. 1999 1 U.S. Geological Survey, MS 939, Denver, CO 80225 2 U.S. Geological Survey, MS 915, Reston, VA 20192 3 U.S. Geological Survey, MS 956, Reston, VA 20192 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards (or with the North American Stratigraphic Code). Use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U. S. Geological Survey. FS-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION FIELD WORK SUMMARY- AUGUST 2-10, 1995 FIELD WORK SUMMARY- JULY 28 TO AUGUST 14, 1996 FIELD WORK SUMMARY- JULY 5-14, 1997 FIELD WORK SUMMARY- AUGUST 2-14, 1997 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS FIGURES FS1. Low altitude air photograph of Kavik Camp FS2. Paleocene clinoforms along the Canning River FS3. Section along the East Fork of Marsh Creek FS4. Sagavanirktok Formation near Kavik Camp FS5. Fire Creek Siltstone in Fire Creek Canyon FS6. Type Section of Hue Shale at Hue Creek FS7. Sampling waters at Red Hill Spring FS8. Oil-stained Sagavanirktok Formation near Kavik FS9. Oil-stained Paleocene sandstones at “Navy” Section FS10.Sampling waters along the Hulahula River FS11.View of Last Creek Section FS12.Kemik Sandstone at “Sadlerochit
    [Show full text]