Kaktovik Subsistence LAND USE VALUES THROUGH TIME in the ARCTIC NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE AREA
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Conditional Probabilities for the Beaufort Sea Planning Area
OCS Report BOEM 2020-003 Oil Spill Risk Analysis: Conditional Probabilities for the Beaufort Sea Planning Area US Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Headquarters This page intentionally left blank. OCS Report BOEM 2020-003 Oil Spill Risk Analysis: Conditional Probabilities for the Beaufort Sea Planning Area January 2020 Authors: Zhen Li Caryn Smith In-House Document by U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Division of Environmental Sciences Sterling, VA US Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Headquarters This page intentionally left blank. REPORT AVAILABILITY To download a PDF file of this report, go to the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Oil Spill Risk Analysis web page (https://www.boem.gov/environment/environmental- assessment/oil-spill-risk-analysis-reports). CITATION Li Z, Smith C. 2020. Oil Spill Risk Analysis: Conditional Probabilities for the Beaufort Sea Planning Area. Sterling (VA): U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. OCS Report BOEM 2020-003. 130 p. ABOUT THE COVER This graphic depicts the study area in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas and boundary segments used in the oil spill risk analysis model for the the Beaufort Sea Planning Area. Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................... i List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................... -
Open Letter from Assistant Administrator(PDF)
USDA MEM United States Department of Agriculture Rural Development OPEN LETTER FROM THE ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR RUS Telecommunications August 29, 2016 Program 1400 Independence Ave, SW Mail Stop 1599 To all RUS Telecommunications personnel, Infrastructure and Washington, DC 20250 Broadband Loan Applicants and Borrowers: Guidelines regarding the Voice 202.690.4673 funding of CPE. CLE, and Premises Wiring. Fax 1.844.885.8181 In order to best serve the residents of rural America, and ensure that they enjoy the same technology enabled opportunities as residents of urban areas, RUS routinely reviews and updates program guidelines and procedures. As part of this endeavor, and in response to multiple inquiries for clarification, the Rural Utilities Service (RUS), has generated an updated set of guidelines addressing the eligibility of program funding for CPE, CLE, and premise wiring under the Infrastructure and Farm Bill Broadband loan programs. To better reflect current technologies and industry practices, these guidelines include an updating of some of the past funding eligibilities. In particular, the funding practices of network elements such as ONTs and DSL Modems located inside a customer's premises, and borrower owned CPE, such as non-integrated Wi-Fi routers, have been addressed and modified. Please contact the Portfolio Management and Risk Assessment Division at (202) 720-1025, or your General Field Representative, if you require clarification or additional information. Sincerely, KEITH B. ADAMS Assistant Administrator Telecommunications Program Rural Utilities Service USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. 2 Farm Bill and Telecommunications Infrastructure Program System Construction Guidelines Guidelines regarding the funding of premises located equipment and cabling GENERAL: These guidelines, effective as of September 1, 2016, are intended to clarify the information regarding the eligibility of equipment and facilities for funding under the Infrastructure (7 CFR 1735) and the Farm Bill Broadband (7 CFR 1738) programs. -
5820 Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line (Adsl) Data Access Service
Bell MTS SUPPLEMENTARY TARIFF CRTC 24002 SPECIAL SERVICES AND FACILITIES Part II 5th Revised Page 81 Cancels 4th Revised Page 81 INTEGRATED DIGITAL NETWORK SERVICES ITEM Because the Commission has forborne, in Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2009-19, with respect to the regulation of this service as set out in that decision, the Company may also provide the service in C this tariff item at rates and on terms different from the tariffed rates and terms pursuant to an agreement entered into between the Company and a competitor that has been filed with the Commission for the C public record. 5820 ASYMMETRIC DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER LINE (ADSL) DATA ACCESS SERVICE 1. GENERAL A. ADSL Data Access service is a broadband access service based on Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line (ADSL) technology. The service enables a High Speed Service Provider (HSSP) to establish a high-speed data access path between its end-user premises and a Company serving Wire Centre. End-user login and C password authentication are established via a “network selection gateway” which can enable access to multiple destination networks. B. ADSL is a transmission technology that provides asymmetric transmission (higher bandwidth in one direction, and lower bandwidth in the opposite direction) of data. ADSL delivers high-speed downstream transmission to the end-user and a lower- speed upstream transmission to the HSSP. No reverse (lower-speed downstream, high-speed upstream) ADSL transmission is permitted. C. The service is limited to lines terminating on individual line station equipment. ADSL Data Access service does not prevent the simultaneous use of the end- user’s telephone line for voice-band applications, permissive data or facsimile. -
Glossary of Common Telecommunications Terms
A Real Estate Professional’s Glossary of Common Telecommunications Terms Bandwidth - A term used to describe the capacity of wiring to carry communications signals or how much information can travel along a pathway in a given period of time. A typical data transmission would involve many thousands or millions of bits per second. Broadband – A communications channel having a bandwidth greater than a voice grade channel characterized by high data transmission speeds. Bundled Services - The combination of several services, such as local telephone, long distance telephone, internet access and video, with a single bill to the customer. Cable System - A multichannel video programming distribution facility consisting of a set of closed transmission paths and associated signal generation, reception and control equipment designed to provide cable service (including video programming) to multiple subscribers within a community. Cell Site - The location of a cellular radio antenna. Cellular Telephone System – A land based mobile telephone system wherein channels assigned to the system are divided among many geographic “cells”, each covering a defined service area. Each cell is served by its own low powered transmitter and receiver and is connected to the telephone network through landline telephone trunks. As a user moves from one cell to an adjacent cell the call is instantly shifted from one transmitter/receiver to the next one. Central Office (C.O.) - Telephone company facility where customers’ lines are joined to switching equipment used for connecting customers to each other, locally and for long distance. Coaxial Cable - A cable consisting of an outer conductor concentric to an inner conductor, separated from each other by insulating material. -
Federal Communications Commission Record 5 FCC Red No
FCC 90-220 Federal Communications Commission Record 5 FCC Red No. 15 VII. Ordering Clauses 84 ·Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 I. INTRODUCTION 1. In Review of Sections 68.104 and 68.213 of the Com mission's Rules Concerning Connection of Simple Inside Wiring to the Telephone Network (Notice of Proposed Rule CC Docket No. 88-57 Making), CC Docket No. 88-57, 3 FCC Red 1120 (1988) (Notice), the Commission undertook a review of the rules In the Matter of setting forth the terms and conditions under which cus tomers may install and connect to the network simple Review of Sections 68.104 and inside telephone wiring. In this Report and Order and 68.213 of the Commission's Rules Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making we (1) modify Section 68.104 to allow customers to connect simple in Concerning Connection of side wiring to the telephone network by direct access to Simple Inside Wiring carrier-installed wiring at points up to and including the to the Telephone Network demarcation point. (2) revise the definition of the de marcation point in Section 68.3 so that in most cases it and will be at or near where wiring enters the customer's premises, (3) modify Section 68.108 to authorize the car Petition for Modification of RM-5643 rier to discontinue service when harm occurs originating from customer-installed wiring, or when the carrier rea Section 68.213 of the Commission's sonably believes such harm is imminent, (4) delete Sec Rules filed by the Electronic tions 68.213 (e), (f) and (g) concerning notification, Industries Association acceptance testing and extraordinary procedures. -
Hotwire 5246 Remote Termination Unit (RTU) Customer Premises Installation Instructions Document Number 5246-A2-GN10-10 February 1998
TM Hotwire 5246 Remote Termination Unit (RTU) Customer Premises Installation Instructions Document Number 5246-A2-GN10-10 February 1998 Before You Begin An optional POTS (Plain Old Telephone Service) splitter is available for the 5246 RTU. When a POTS splitter is installed, the telephone and 5246 RADSL (Rate Adaptive Digital Subscriber Line) RTU can function at the same time over the same pair of copper wires. In order to confirm the RTU installation, the POTS splitter should be installed first. To install a POTS splitter, refer to the appropriate POTS splitter document: Document Number Document Title 5030-A2-GN10 Hotwire 5030 POTS Splitter Customer Premises Installation Instructions 5034-A2-GN10 Hotwire 5034 Indoor POTS Splitter Customer Premises Installation Instructions 5038-A2-GN10 Hotwire 5038 Distributed POTS Splitter Customer Premises Installation Instructions Contact your sales or service representative to order additional product documentation. Paradyne documents are also available on the World Wide Web at: http://www.paradyne.com Select Service & Support → Technical Manuals Wiring and Cables Needed The following wiring and standard connectors are used with this product: - New or existing unshielded twisted-pair wiring (CAT3 or better). The CAT3 wiring must meet EIA/TIA-568 specifications with 24 AWG (.5 mm) or 26 AWG (.4 mm). - Standard RJ11 wall jack. - Standard Ethernet 8-pin, non-keyed modular plug for a PC or workstation. An Ethernet straight-through or crossover cable is used. Refer to Installing the RTU, page 8, for Ethernet cable details. 1 Package Checklist Verify that your package contains the following: - Model 5246 Remote Termination Unit (RTU) - DSL interface cable with RJ11 modular plugs - Power cord with power transformer - Two ferrite chokes - Warranty card Refer to Cables & Connectors, page 14, for standard pin numbers. -
Download (PDF)
FEDERAL REGULATION AND COMPETITIVE ACCESS TO MULTIPLE-UNIT PREMISES: MORE CHOICE IN COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES? LYNNE HOLT* & MARK JAMISON** I. INTRODUCTION The nature of competition in the United States’ communications sector changed significantly over the past two decades. Before the 1990s, ‘‘competition’’ referred to the fight among providers of discrete services, such as the contest among AT&T, MCI, and Sprint over the long- distance slice of the communications pie. Today, competition is much more likely to describe the fight over the entire pie, among firms offering a ‘‘triple play’’ of services----high-speed Internet service, video, and t e l e p h o n y ----over a single broadband platform. Some firms recently expanded the pie with a ‘‘quadruple play’’ that includes wireless services as well. Cable operators, traditional wireline telephone companies, and, increasingly, wireless providers are competing to offer consumers both the underlying broadband platform and various bundled services that ride across it. However, not all consumers benefit from this competition in like manner.1 Public policy deliberations tend to focus more on differences in access to communications services either between consumers in rural and * Dr. Lynne Holt, Policy Analyst, Public Utility Research Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-7142, [email protected]. ** Dr. Mark A. Jamison, Director, Public Utility Research Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-7142, [email protected]. The authors appreciate the review by Mr. William Cox, Able Band Chartered, and his suggestions for improving an earlier version of this paper. 1. For example, the staff of the New York Public Service Commission found differences between geographic areas in terms of the competitive alternatives that customers enjoyed. -
This Manuscript Has Been Reproduced from the Microfilm Master. UMI Films the Text Directly from the Original Or Copy Submitted
Returning: Twentieth century performances of the King Island Wolf Dance Item Type Thesis Authors Kingston, Deanna Marie Download date 09/10/2021 06:41:20 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/9533 INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. Bell & Howell Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. -
North Slope Borough Comprehensive Plan
North Slope Borough Comprehensive Plan August 25, 1993 Return comments to: Kirk Wickersham Attorney at Law Planning Consultant 3111 C Street, Suite 200 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Draft North Slope Borough Comprehensive Plan Table of Contents CHAPTER\. BOUNDARlliSANDLANDSTATUS 1.1 Introduction 1 \.2 Land Use 2 1.3 Land Status 2 1.4 Land Management Programs 3 1.4.1 Federal management 3 1.4.2 State Management 6 1.4.3 Arctic Slope Regional Corporation Management 7 1.4.4 North Slope Borough Management 7 1.5 References 8 CHAPTER 2. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT 9 2.1 Introduction 9 2.2 Water Resources 10 2.2.1 Surface Water 11 2.2.2 Distribution of Runoff 12 2.2.3 Water Quality 12 2.2.4 Sediment 13 2.2.5 Groundwater and Pennafrost 14 2.2.6 Domestic Consumption 15 2.2.7 Industrial Areas (Prudhoe Bay) 16 2.2.8 Water Related Development Issues 16 2.3 Air Quality 16 2.3.1 Nitrogen Oxides 17 2.3.2 Sulphur Dioxide 17 2.3.3 Ozone 17 2.3.4 Carbon Monoxide 18 2.3.5 Hydrocarbons 18 2.3.6 Total Suspended Particulates 18 2.4 Noise Analysis 19 2.5 Other Pollutants 19 2.6 Beach Erosion 20 2.7 Offshore Environmental Hazards 20 2.7.1 Sea Ice IInpacts 21 2.7.2 Wave Erosion 21 2.8 Onshore Environmental Hazards 22 2.8.1 Flooding : 22 2.8.2 Pennafrost 22 2.8.3 High Winds 22 2.8.4 Subsea Pennafrost 22 2.8.5 Seismic Activity 22 2.8.6 Soil Erosion 23 2.8.7 Topographic Hazards 23 2.9 References 24 CHAPTER 3. -
The Sea Ice Topography of M'clure Strait in Winter and Summer Of
ARCTK: VOL. 37. NO. 2 (JUNE 1984) P. 110-120 The Sea Ice Topography of M’Clure Strait in Winter and Summer of 1960 from Submarine Profiles ALFRED S. MCLARENI, PETER WADHAMS2, and RUTH WEINTRAUB2 ABSTRACT. Submarine profiles of the ice underside in M’Clure Strait were obtained by USS Sorgo in February 1960 and by USS Seadmgon in August 1960. They gavethe first quantitative measurementsof the icedraft distribution in the strait and in the nearby BeaufortSea shelf zone, as well as providing a seasonal comparison of iceconditions within a single year. Analysis of the profiles reveals a region of very high meanice draft (7.8 m) and heavy ridging off the southwest tip of Prince Patrick Island in winter. Within M’Clure Strait itself the mean ice draft lay in the4-5 m range and the draft distribution showed that the ice was mainly first-year, as opposed to the mixture of first- and multi-year ice that exists out in the Beaufort Sea. This suggests a local origin for the ice in the strait. Pressure ridges were much more frequent in summer than in winter, as were polynyas. Both the pressure ridge draft distribution (in summer) and the ice draft distribution at great depths (in summer and winter) fitted a negative exponential distribution, in common with other ice profiles which have been analysed. Key words: sea ice, pressure ridges, sonar, M’Clure Strait, Viscount Melville Sound RfiSUMk. Des profils sous-marins de la surface infkrieure de la glace dans le dktroit M’Clure furent obtenus par 1’U.S.S. -
Euro-American Whaler Interaction on Herschel Island, Northern Yukon T
event or conjuncture? searching for the material record of inuvialuit–euro-american whaler interaction on herschel island, northern yukon T. Max Friesen Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto, 19 Russell St., Toronto, ON M5S 2S2; [email protected] abstract During the 1890s, northern Yukon saw sustained and intensive interaction between local Mackenzie Inuit, foreign commercial whaling crews, and between whaling crews and Alaska Iñupiat at Pauline Cove on Herschel Island. The historical record for this period is rich, leading to an expectation that Inuit activities dating to this period should be well represented in the archaeological record. However, three field seasons of archaeological survey and excavation did not reveal the expected density of Inuit occupations dating to the 1890s. Instead, only two atypical and in some ways ambiguous components were encountered that could be confidently dated to this period and related to Inuit activities. In this paper, these two components are described and reasons for their rarity are discussed. keywords: Herschel Island, Inuvialuit, interaction, whalers, ethnicity introduction This paper is about looking for hard archaeological evi- the whaler era in inuvialuit history dence for a key “event” in Inuvialuit history: the brief but critical period during which Inuit, Euro-American whal- The Mackenzie Delta region generally, and Herschel ers, Athapaskans, and people of many other backgrounds Island specifically, have been occupied by Inuit since interacted in the Mackenzie Delta region during the 1890s. the Thule migration, currently dated in this region to Based on the prominence of this period in Inuvialuit his- around ad 1200 (Friesen and Arnold 2008). -
OCS Study MMS 2006-14 Demographics and Behavior Of
OCS Study MMS 2006-14 Demographics and Behavior of Polar Bears Feeding on Bowhead Whale Carcasses at Barter and Cross Islands, Alaska, 2002-2004 Prepared for: U.S. Department of the Interior Minerals Management Service Alaska Outer Continental Shelf Region Final Report Demographics and Behavior of Polar Bears Feeding on Bowhead Whale Carcasses at Barter and Cross Islands, Alaska, 2002-2004 by Susanne Miller, Scott Schliebe, and Kelly Proffitt U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Marine Mammals Management 1011 E. Tudor Road Anchorage, Alaska 99503 April 2006 This study was funded by the U.S. Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Alaska Outer Continental Shelf Region, Anchorage, Alaska, under Intra-agency Agreement No. 0102RU85166, NSL # AK-02-10, as part of the MMS Alaska Environmental Studies Program. The opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this report or product are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Department of the Interior, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the Federal Government. Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank the Minerals Management Service for funding this study. Special appreciation is extended to the Nuiqsut Whaling Captains Association and the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge for providing accommodations and logistical support at Cross and Barter islands, respectively. We thank the following people who participated in data collection: Sherman Anderson (Alaska Nanuuq Commission); Anthony Fischbach and Steven Partridge (U.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center); Jason Ransom (National Park Service, Denali National Park), Alan Brackney, Sara Gillespie, Steven Kendall, Jennifer Reed, Cashell Villa, Tara Wertz, and Gary Wheeler (U.S.