DOCSLIB.ORG

Historical Shoreline Change Along the North Coast of Alaska, US

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Historical Shoreline Change Along the North Coast of Alaska, US National Assessment of Shoreline Change— Historical Shoreline Change Along the North Coast of Alaska, U.S.-Canadian Border to Icy Cape Open-File Report 2015–1048 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Oblique aerial photograph at Flaxman Island showing tapped and untapped thermokarst lakes, caribou tracks, narrow beaches, and bluff failures along the coast. Image taken August 9, 2006. National Assessment of Shoreline Change— Historical Shoreline Change along the North Coast of Alaska, U.S.–Canadian Border to Icy Cape By Ann E. Gibbs and Bruce M. Richmond Open–File Report 2015–1048 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2015 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS (1–888–275–8747). For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Gibbs, A.E., and Richmond, B.M., 2015, National assessment of shoreline change—Historical shoreline change along the north coast of Alaska, U.S.–Canadian border to Icy Cape: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2015–1048, 96 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20151048. ISSN 2331-1258 (online) iii Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................3 U.S. Geological Survey National Assessment of Shoreline Change ............................................3 The Role of State and Federal Governments ...................................................................................4 Previous National and Northern Alaska Shoreline Assessments .........................................................5 Geology and Geomorphology of the North Coast of Alaska ...................................................................6 Lands of Unique Importance ...............................................................................................................6 Geologic and Tectonic Setting ............................................................................................................7 The Late Quaternary ....................................................................................................................7 Surficial Geology and Geomorphology .............................................................................................8 Coastal Environments .................................................................................................................8 Coastal Bluffs ......................................................................................................................8 Beaches and Barrier Spits ................................................................................................9 Barrier Islands .....................................................................................................................9 Coastal Lagoons ..................................................................................................................9 Wetlands ............................................................................................................................10 Deltas ................................................................................................................................10 Permafrost .........................................................................................................................10 Thermokarst .......................................................................................................................10 Dunes ................................................................................................................................10 Methods of Analyzing Shoreline Change ................................................................................................11 Compilation of Historical Shorelines ...............................................................................................11 1940s-Era Shorelines .................................................................................................................12 2000s-Era Shorelines .................................................................................................................13 Estimation of Shoreline Position Uncertainty ................................................................................14 Calculation of Shoreline Change Rates ..........................................................................................16 Estimation of Shoreline Change Rate Uncertainty at Individual Transects .....................16 Estimation of Regionally Averaged Shoreline Change Rate Uncertainty .........................16 Historical Shoreline Change Analysis ......................................................................................................17 (1) U.S.-Canadian Border to Jago River ..........................................................................................25 Introduction.................................................................................................................................25 Sheltered Mainland-Lagoon Shoreline Change ...................................................................26 Exposed Open-Ocean Shoreline Change ..............................................................................26 (2) Jago River to Staines River .........................................................................................................31 Introduction.................................................................................................................................31 Sheltered Mainland-Lagoon Shoreline Change ...................................................................33 Jago River Delta to Okpilak-Hulahula River Delta .......................................................33 Okpilak-Hulahula River Delta to Sadlerochit River .....................................................33 Sadlerochit River to Konganevik Point ..........................................................................34 Konganevik Point to Staines River .................................................................................34 Exposed Open-Ocean Shoreline Change ..............................................................................35 Jago River Delta to Okpilak-Hulahula River Delta .......................................................35 iv Contents—Continued Okpilak-Hulahula River Delta to Sadlerochit River .....................................................35 Sadlerochit River to Konganevik Point ..........................................................................35 Konganevik Point to the Staines River ..........................................................................36 (3) Staines River to Sagavanirktok River .........................................................................................38 Introduction.................................................................................................................................38 Sheltered Mainland-Lagoon Shoreline Change ...................................................................41 Exposed Open-Ocean Shoreline Change ..............................................................................41 Flaxman Island ..................................................................................................................44 Maguire Islands ................................................................................................................45 Stockton Islands ...............................................................................................................45 McClure Islands ................................................................................................................45 Tigvariak Islands ...............................................................................................................45 (4) Sagavanirktok River to Colville River .........................................................................................47 Introduction.................................................................................................................................47 Sheltered Mainland-Lagoon Shoreline Change ...................................................................49 Heald Point to Point McIntyre (Prudhoe Bay) ..............................................................49 Point McIntyre to Kuparuk River Delta .........................................................................49 Kuparuk River Delta to Milne Point ................................................................................49 Milne Point to Oliktok Point .............................................................................................51
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Beaufort Seas West To
    71° 162° 160° 158° 72° U LEGEND 12N 42W Ch u $ North Slope Planning Area ckchi Sea Conservation System Unit (Offset for display) Pingasagruk (abandoned) WAINWRIGHT Atanik (Abandoned) Naval Arctic Research Laboratory USGS 250k Quad Boundaries U Point Barrow I c U Point Belcher 24N Township Boundaries y 72° Akeonik (Ruins) Icy Cape U 17W C 12N Browerville a Trans-Alaska Pipeline p 39W 22N Solivik Island e Akvat !. P Ikpilgok 20W Barrow Secondary Roads (unpaved) a Asiniak!. Point s MEADE RIVER s !. !. Plover Point !. Wainwright Point Franklin !. Brant Point !. Will Rogers and Wiley Post Memorial Whales1 U Point Collie Tolageak (Abandoned) 9N Point Marsh Emaiksoun Lake Kilmantavi (Abandoned) !. Kugrua BayEluksingiak Point Seahorse Islands Bowhead Whale, Major Adult Area (June-September) 42W Kasegaluk Lagoon West Twin TekegakrokLake Point ak Pass Sigeakruk Point uitk A Mitliktavik (Abandoned) Peard Bay l U Ikroavik Lake E Tapkaluk Islands k Wainwright Inlet o P U Bowhead Whale, Major Adult Area (May) l 12N k U i i e a n U re Avak Inlet Avak Point k 36W g C 16N 22N a o Karmuk Point Tutolivik n U Elson Lagoon t r !. u a White (Beluga) Whale, Major Adult Area (September) !. a !. 14N m 29W 17W t r 17N u W Nivat Point o g P 32W Av k a a Nokotlek Point !. 26W Nulavik l A s P v a a s Nalimiut Point k a k White (Beluga) Whale, Major Adult Area (May-September) MEADE RIVER p R s Pingorarok Hill BARROW U a Scott Point i s r Akunik Pass Kugachiak Creek v ve e i !.
    [Show full text]
  • Conditional Probabilities for the Beaufort Sea Planning Area
    OCS Report BOEM 2020-003 Oil Spill Risk Analysis: Conditional Probabilities for the Beaufort Sea Planning Area US Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Headquarters This page intentionally left blank. OCS Report BOEM 2020-003 Oil Spill Risk Analysis: Conditional Probabilities for the Beaufort Sea Planning Area January 2020 Authors: Zhen Li Caryn Smith In-House Document by U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Division of Environmental Sciences Sterling, VA US Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Headquarters This page intentionally left blank. REPORT AVAILABILITY To download a PDF file of this report, go to the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Oil Spill Risk Analysis web page (https://www.boem.gov/environment/environmental- assessment/oil-spill-risk-analysis-reports). CITATION Li Z, Smith C. 2020. Oil Spill Risk Analysis: Conditional Probabilities for the Beaufort Sea Planning Area. Sterling (VA): U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. OCS Report BOEM 2020-003. 130 p. ABOUT THE COVER This graphic depicts the study area in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas and boundary segments used in the oil spill risk analysis model for the the Beaufort Sea Planning Area. Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................... i List of Figures ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Glacial & Coastal Landforms
    1 GEOMORPHOLOGY 201 READER PART IV : EVOLUTION OF GLACIAL & COASTAL LANDFORMS A landform is a small to medium tract or parcel of the earth’s surface. After weathering processes have had their actions on the earth materials making up the surface of the earth, the geomorphic agents like running water, ground water, wind, glaciers, waves perform erosion. The previous sections covered the erosion and deposition and hence landforms caused by running water (fluvial geomorphology) and by wind (aeolian geomorphology). Erosion causes changes on the surface of the earth and is followed by deposition, which likewise causes changes to occur on the surface of the earth. Several related landforms together make up landscapes, thereby forming large tracts of the surface of the earth. Each landform has its own physical shape, size, materials and is a result of the action of certain geomorphic processes and agents. Actions of most of the geomorphic processes and agents are slow, and hence the results take a long time to take shape. Every landform has a beginning. Landforms once formed may change their shape, size and nature slowly or fast due to continued action of geomorphic processes and agents. Due to changes in climatic conditions and vertical or horizontal movements of landmasses, either the intensity of processes or the processes themselves might change leading to new modifications in the landforms. Evolution here implies stages of transformation of either a part of the earth’s surface from one landform into another or transformation of individual landforms after they are once formed. That means, each and every landform has a history of development and changes through time.
    [Show full text]
  • Bering Sea NWFC/NMFS
    VOLUME 1. MARINE MAMMALS, MARINE BIRDS VOLUME 2, FISH, PLANKTON, BENTHOS, LITTORAL VOLUME 3, EFFECTS, CHEMISTRY AND MICROBIOLOGY, PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY VOLUME 4. GEOLOGY, ICE, DATA MANAGEMENT Environmental Assessment of the Alaskan Continental Shelf July - Sept 1976 quarterly reports from Principal Investigators participatingin a multi-year program of environmental assessment related to petroleum development on the Alaskan Continental Shelf. The program is directed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration under the sponsorship of the Bureau of Land Management. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORIES Boulder, Colorado November 1976 VOLUME 1 CONTENTS MARINE MAMMALS vii MARINE BIRDS 167 iii MARINE MAMMALS v MARINE MAMMALS Research Unit Proposer Title Page 34 G. Carleton Ray Analysis of Marine Mammal Remote 1 Douglas Wartzok Sensing Data Johns Hopkins U. 67 Clifford H. Fiscus Baseline Characterization of Marine 3 Howard W. Braham Mammals in the Bering Sea NWFC/NMFS 68 Clifford H. Fiscus Abundance and Seasonal Distribution 30 Howard W. Braham of Marine Mammals in the Gulf of Roger W. Mercer Alaska NWFC/NMFS 69 Clifford H. Fiscus Distribution and Abundance of Bowhead 33 Howard W. Braham and Belukha Whales in the Bering Sea NWFC/NMFS 70 Clifford H. Fiscus Distribution and Abundance of Bow- 36 Howard W. Braham et al head and Belukha Whales in the NWFC/NMFS Beaufort and Chukchi Seas 194 Francis H. Fay Morbidity and Mortality of Marine 43 IMS/U. of Alaska Mammals 229 Kenneth W. Pitcher Biology of the Harbor Seal, Phoca 48 Donald Calkins vitulina richardi, in the Gulf of ADF&G Alaska 230 John J. Burns The Natural History and Ecology of 55 Thomas J.
    [Show full text]
  • An International Journal Published by the Marine Environmental Alabama Sciences Consortium Of
    An International Journal Evolution of the Florida State University Coastal and Marine Laboratory MICHAEL J. GREENBERG,WILLIAM F. HERRNKIND, AND FELICIA C. COLEMAN Published by the Marine Environmental Sciences Consortium of Alabama Gulf of Mexico Science, 2010(1–2), pp. 149–163 Evolution of the Florida State University Coastal and Marine Laboratory MICHAEL J. GREENBERG,WILLIAM F. HERRNKIND, AND FELICIA C. COLEMAN SIXTY YEARS OF HISTORY and the toponym Turkey Point Laboratory or, more often, the FSU Marine Laboratory n 1949, just 2 yr after the Florida State College (FSUML) stuck for more than 4 decades. I for Women was transformed into a coeduca- In 2006, Felicia Coleman became the 13th tional institution—The Florida State University director of the Laboratory. She is the first (FSU)—marine science gained a permanent director whose primary workplace is at the foothold on the Tallahassee campus with the laboratory, and the first with an on-site faculty formation of The Oceanographic Institute (OI). to manage. And the laboratory became the FSU This institute—within the College of Arts and Coastal and Marine Laboratory (FSUCML). Sciences—was meant to train graduate students The history of these two laboratories, which in marine science, to provide marine research follows, is narrated primarily by three of the 13 facilities for faculty and students and visiting directors. We have divided the narrative into four investigators, to conduct interdisciplinary basic distinct periods: The Genesis, 15 yr at Alligator research in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico, and Harbor; The Great Move from Alligator Harbor also to conduct applied research directed toward to Turkey Point, 7 yr of change; The Long improving Florida’s fishing industry and devel- Struggle at Turkey Point, 34 yr of intermittent, oping other marine resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Beaufort Sea: Hypothetical Very Large Oil Spill and Gas Release
    OCS Report BOEM 2020-001 BEAUFORT SEA: HYPOTHETICAL VERY LARGE OIL SPILL AND GAS RELEASE U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Alaska OCS Region OCS Study BOEM 2020-001 BEAUFORT SEA: HYPOTHETICAL VERY LARGE OIL SPILL AND GAS RELEASE January 2020 Author: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Alaska OCS Region U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Alaska OCS Region REPORT AVAILABILITY To download a PDF file of this report, go to the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (www.boem.gov/newsroom/library/alaska-scientific-and-technical-publications, and click on 2020). CITATION BOEM, 2020. Beaufort Sea: Hypothetical Very Large Oil Spill and Gas Release. OCS Report BOEM 2020-001 Anchorage, AK: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Alaska OCS Region. 151 pp. Beaufort Sea: Hypothetical Very Large Oil Spill and Gas Release BOEM Contents List of Abbreviations and Acronyms ............................................................................................................. vii 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 What is a VLOS? ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 What Could Precipitate a VLOS? ................................................................................................ 1 1.2.1 Historical OCS and Worldwide
    [Show full text]
  • Oce1001, Introduction to Oceanography, Fall, 2005
    OCE1001, INTRODUCTION TO OCEANOGRAPHY, Fall, 2018 THIRD MID-TERM EXAMINATION Test No. 0001 Name: __________________________ READ THIS!!!! Put your name in the blank above. Read all questions carefully, and answer only the question which is asked. You may find the following equations useful: C = (gL/2) = 1.25 L (m/s) Where: C = speed of a wave and: g = gravity = 9.8 m/s2 C = (gD) = 3.1 D (m/s) L = wavelength of a wave C = 1.56 T (m/s) D = water depth C = L/T T = period of a wave PLEASE WRITE NEATLY. Matching: The Beaches Are Moving (8 pts) Do not put these on the scantron sheet. ____ neap ____ hook A. worldwide change in sea level. B. structure intended to widen a beach. ____ jetty ____ groin C. wall intended to keep a channel open. D. two high and two low tides per day. ____ eustatic E. current parallel to the shore caused by waves. ____ semidiurnal F. twice monthly tide that with a smaller than average range. ____ marine terrace G. bend in end of a spit caused by wave refraction. ____ longshore current H. region eroded flat by waves, elevated above sea level. ____ longitudinal I. disturbance of wave is parallel to wave movement Multiple Choice: (2 pts each) Put the answers to these questions on the scantron sheet. 1. In Figure 1, the features labeled 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 are, respectively: a. spit, barrier island, baymouth bar, hook, tombolo. b. hook, spit, baymouth bar, barrier island, tombolo. c. tombolo, spit, baymouth bar, barrier island, hook.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGIC MAP of the KAVIK RIVER AREA, NORTHEASTERN BROOKS RANGE, ALASKA by M.A
    Report of Investigations 2011-3A GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE KAVIK RIVER AREA, NORTHEASTERN BROOKS RANGE, ALASKA by M.A. Wartes, W.K. Wallace, A.M. Loveland, R.J. Gillis, P.L. Decker, R.R. Reifenstuhl, P.R. Delaney, D.L. LePain, and E.C. Carson Exposure of the Hue Shale along Juniper Creek. The unit is interpreted as a condensed Brookian section that accumulated in the distal, underfilled portion of the northeastern Colville foreland basin. The Upper Cretaceous portion of the unit shown here includes distinctive bright-weathering silicified tuff, creamy bentonite, and organic-rich fissile shale. Note geologist at far left for scale. Published by STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL & GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS 2011 Report of Investigations 2011-3A GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE KAVIK RIVER AREA, NORTHEASTERN BROOKS RANGE, ALASKA by M.A. Wartes, W.K. Wallace, A.M. Loveland, R.J. Gillis, P.L. Decker, R.R. Reifenstuhl, P.R. Delaney, D.L. LePain, and E.C. Carson 2011 This DGGS Report of Investigations is a final report of scientific research. It has received technical review and may be cited as an agency publication. STATE OF ALASKA Sean Parnell, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Daniel S. Sullivan Commissioner DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL & GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS Robert F. Swenson, State Geologist and Director Publications produced by the Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys (DGGS) are available for free download from the DGGS website (www.dggs.alaska.gov). Publications on hard-copy or digital media can be examined or purchased in the Fairbanks office: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys 3354 College Rd., Fairbanks, Alaska 99709-3707 Phone: (907) 451-5020 Fax (907) 451-5050 [email protected] www.dggs.alaska.gov Alaska State Library Alaska Resource Library & Information State Office Building, 8th Floor Services (ARLIS) 333 Willoughby Avenue 3150 C Street, Suite 100 Juneau, Alaska 99811-0571 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Elmer E.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Use Summary Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Public Use Summary Arctic National Wildlife Refuge April 2010 Arctic National Wildlife Refuge 907/456-0250 800/362-4546 [email protected] http://arctic.fws.gov/ Report Highlights: This report contains a summary of historic visitor use information compiled for the area now designated within the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge boundary (up to 1997); depicts a general index of recent visitor use patterns (1998-2009) based upon available data; summarizes available harvest data for general hunting and trapping; and discusses current trends in public use with implications for future management practices. Recent visitor use patterns include: Visitation has generally remained steady since the late 1980s, averaging around 1000 visitors, yet at the same time there has been a steady increase in the number of commercial permits issued. The Dalton Highway serves as a significant access corridor to the Refuge. The highway passes less than a mile from Atigun Gorge, which has experienced a steady increase in visitation. The majority of visitors float rivers, while hiking/backpacking and hunting comprise other major user activities. Across activity types, more than half of the commercially-supported visitation is guided. On average, where locations are known, about 77% of overall commercially-supported visitation occurs north of the Brooks Range, while about 23% occurs on the south side. Nearly one-quarter (21%) of the commercially-supported visitors to the Refuge visit the Kongakut River drainage on the north side of the Brooks Range. Commercially guided or transported recreational visitors spend, on average, about nine days in the Refuge, in groups that average around five individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 83 Thursday, No. 22 February 1, 2018 Pages
    Vol. 83 Thursday, No. 22 February 1, 2018 Pages 4575–4830 OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL REGISTER VerDate Sep 11 2014 21:58 Jan 31, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\01FEWS.LOC 01FEWS daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with FRONT MATTER WS II Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 22 / Thursday, February 1, 2018 The FEDERAL REGISTER (ISSN 0097–6326) is published daily, SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Monday through Friday, except official holidays, by the Office PUBLIC of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register Subscriptions: Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) and the regulations of the Administrative Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Committee of the Federal Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Assistance with public subscriptions 202–512–1806 Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20402 is the exclusive distributor of the official General online information 202–512–1530; 1–888–293–6498 edition. Periodicals postage is paid at Washington, DC. Single copies/back copies: The FEDERAL REGISTER provides a uniform system for making Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Assistance with public single copies 1–866–512–1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and (Toll-Free) Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general FEDERAL AGENCIES applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published Subscriptions: by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public interest. Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions: Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Email [email protected] Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the Phone 202–741–6000 issuing agency requests earlier filing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trans-Alaska Pipeline System Facilitates Shrub Establishment in Northern Alaska Rosemary A
    ARCTIC VOL. 71, N0. 3 (SEPTEMBER 2018) P. 249 – 258 https://doi.org/10.14430/arctic4729 The Trans-Alaska Pipeline System Facilitates Shrub Establishment in Northern Alaska Rosemary A. Dwight1,2 and David M. Cairns1 (Received 2 February 2018; accepted in revised form 22 May 2018) ABSTRACT. The Arctic tundra is undergoing many environmental changes in addition to increasing temperatures: these changes include permafrost degradation and increased shrubification. Disturbances related to infrastructure can also lead to similar environmental changes. The Trans-Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS) is an example of infrastructure that has made a major imprint on the Alaskan landscape. This paper assesses changes in shrub presence along the northernmost 255 km of the TAPS. We used historical satellite imagery from before construction of the TAPS in 1974 and contemporary satellite imagery from 2010 to 2016 to examine changes in shrub presence over time. We found a 51.8% increase in shrub presence adjacent to the pipeline compared to 2.6% in control areas. Additionally, shrub presence has increased significantly more in areas where the pipeline is buried, indicating that the disturbances linked to pipeline burial have likely created favorable conditions for shrub colonization. These results are important for predicting potential responses of tundra vegetation to disturbance, which will be crucial to forecasting the future of Arctic tundra vegetation. Key words: shrub expansion; Arctic change; tundra; Trans-Alaska Pipeline System; permafrost; disturbance RÉSUMÉ. La toundra de l’Arctique fait l’objet de nombreux changements environnementaux, sans compter que les températures augmentent. Ces changements touchent notamment la dégradation du pergélisol et l’intensification des arbustaies.
    [Show full text]
  • 174 Coastal Processes and Hazards I. WATER, WAVES and COASTAL
    Coastal Processes and Hazards I. WATER, WAVES AND COASTAL DYNAMICS A. Beach and coastal areas represent sites of dynamic sedimentation, erosion and re- working of river-borne sediments as they reach coastal regions 1. Dynamic interaction between wind, waves, sedimentation and erosion 2. Coastal areas noted for extremely variable meteorologic conditions 3. Hurricanes and storms profoundly influence coastal morphology a. Wave energy and wind energy during coastal storms exhibit great capability to do work in the form of erosion and transportation of sediment (1) Eg. storm wash-over processes (2) storm surges (3) changes in coastal morphology via erosion and sedimentation 4. Gross coastal configuration primarily a function of plate tectonic history, however relentless wave processes modify coast through erosion and sedimentation B. The Ocean and Wave Activity 1. Beach/coastal sand/sediment profoundly influenced by wave action a. waves provide motion/energy for transportation and erosion of sediment 2. Waves generated by wind shear blowing across ocean surface for long distances a. shear creates orbital rotation of water to form water waves (1) orbital motion = circular to and fro motion, diminishing in intensity at depth from surface (2) Although the wave is passed through the water as a medium; actual water molecules are NOT displaced as the wave is propagated b. Wave form controlled by: (1) wind velocity (2) duration of wind (3) fetch- distance over which wind blows (length across water) (> fetch, > wave amplitude) 3. Wave Morphology a. Wave crest: high upper peak of wave train b. Wave trough: low separating two crests c. Wave Height: vertical distance between crest and trough (1) Avg.
    [Show full text]