DOCSLIB.ORG

REVISED CORE STRATEGY CONSULTATION June – August 2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
REVISED CORE STRATEGY CONSULTATION June – August 2009 REVISED CORE STRATEGY CONSULTATION June – August 2009 SCHEDULE OF COMMENTS MADE AND OFFICER RESPONSES (OCTOBER 2009) Worthing Borough Council Revised Core Strategy Consultation Responses and Officer Comments Reported at: 27/10/09 CS Section - Responses What section - Do you of the agree or Organisation Person document are Comments - Do you have any comments on the text, policies, Full Name disagree Council comments - Officer Comments Details ID you making areas of change or options in this section? with the your content of comments this on? section? Chapter 2 (Characteristics of the Borough) provides a summary of the town's demographic profile. In particular, paragraph General Mr My only comment on this occasion refers to provision for older 2.10 relates to the older population in the Comment on Resident Peter 184551 Disagree residents. i couldn't find any specific references to this aspect, which town. The need to meet the needs of this Whole Stafford is of particular significance to this town. sector of the population is reflected Document throughout the document, for example, within the Strategic Objectives (4,5,7) and the Housing and Infrastructure chapter. There are a lot of inconsistent references to "tourism, visitors, leisure, entertainment and culture", in no particular order, but no grounding of It is agreed that for clarity and accuracy what each means, and in what context. The importance of this reference to the Dome should be amended to distinction in relation to the integrity of the Dome Cinema as a read Grade II* Listed Dome Cinema. Cinema can be seen, for instance, in the different category 'use Reference to this designation provides clear within a use' D2 Use Classes in para. A.6 below. indication that the 'Dome' has historic and para. 3.13 refers to "the town centre and seafront areas (establishing) References to architectectural importance and there is no themselves as high quality visitor destinations and a local leisure and Tourism, need to repeat this within the text. recreational resource". Culture, Although it is considered that references to Mr para. 3.21 refers to "investment in leisure, cultural and tourism Save the Community, 'tourism, visitors, leisure, entertainment and Robin 184683 Disagree related facilities has been lacking". Dome Leisure and culture' have been made consistently and King para. 3.36 states: "A number of leisure and community facilities in the Entertainment appropriately throughout the Core Strategy Borough are in need of either enhancement, replacement and in throughout the attention will be given to the potential for some cases new provision". I cannot actually find any proposed document improving clarity in this regard during strategy for achieving this even through the "7 Strategic Directives". subsequent revisions to the document. The para. 6.44 refers to "the role of cultural and leisure based growth". aim of improving and delivering these para. 6.47 in line seven a "visitor and entertainment hub" and a elements is reflected within the strategic "heritage quarter" are referred to. Where better than based on the objectives (particularly Strategic Objectives 2, Dome Cinema? 3 and 5). para. 6.54 refers to "reinforcing the town centre's role for culture, tourism and leisure" and "see Worthing become an attractive CS Section - Responses What section - Do you of the agree or Organisation Person document are Comments - Do you have any comments on the text, policies, Full Name disagree Council comments - Officer Comments Details ID you making areas of change or options in this section? with the your content of comments this on? section? destination with the dynamic economy that serves visitors, business and leisure". Where better than in the Dome Cinema? Policy 4 refers to "the need to promote the provision of new tourist and leisure within the town with a particular focus on the town centre and seafront area". Where better than in the Dome Cinema? These particular expressions are scattered throughout the Area of Change texts: AOC2 Aquarena refers to "leisure" uses; AOC3 Stagecoach Site provides for "Cultural uses" in the area (includes the Dome Cinema); AOC4 Grafton refers to "leisure" uses; AOC5 Union Place south refers to "leisure and entertainment" in relation to Connaught Theatre; AOC6 Teville Gate regers to "leisure" uses. Ergo - the only AOC specific site that mentions "Culture" is in relation to the Dome Cinema. BUT nowhere does it define what is meant by this in the Core Strategy or its Appendices. It does not even mention the Dome is a cinema at all (let alone a cultural centre). The Core Strategy does not mention that the Dome Cinema has an "exceptional" designation of historic and architectural importance through its Grade ll* listing. It should mention all these things. It is acknowledged that High Salvington has a distinctive character and a number of attractive features. However, the Council aims to ensure that no insensitive development is permitted anywhere within the There is no reference to producing a Development Plan Document, Borough and it would be wrong to single out a which this Association considers critical. This Association would want specific area and produce a DPD in this High to see High Salvington recognised as requiring special protection Mr regard. Salvington Omission from against insensitive development, through the DPD. (Separate, Brian R 321785 Disagree Strategic Objective 6 seeks to deliver high Residents' the document detailed document attached as part of this representation, titled: 'High Lewis quality distinctive places and ensure that new Association Salvington - Need for Specific DPD'). development is built to a high standard that See also your paragraph 8.4: 'Natural Environment and Landscape enhances the environment and respects the Character', and Policy 15: 'Built Environment and Design'. character of the Borough. In High Salvington, as elsewehere in the Borough, very careful consideration will be given to the impact of any development proposals on the character of the area. CS Section - Responses What section - Do you of the agree or Organisation Person document are Comments - Do you have any comments on the text, policies, Full Name disagree Council comments - Officer Comments Details ID you making areas of change or options in this section? with the your content of comments this on? section? The Core Strategy is the key document in the LDF as, once adopted, it will set out the overall vision and strategy for place-making and it will provide the context for all subsequent Local Development Documents and their policies. However, it should be noted that the detailed work programme is set out within the Local Development Scheme (LDS). It is expected that the LDS will be reviewed in early 2010 when greater clarity on the future work programme beyond the adoption of the Core Strategy will be provided. Part of the work programme is likely to include a review of existing and potential Conservation Areas within the Borough. Worthing's role within the wider Sub-Region is covered within the document (particularly Document as a I think that generally from the reading of the Core Strategy that Chapter 3 - Issues and Challenges). Planning Mrs wole - Worthing as a place could be viewed as unconnected to surrounding However, it is agreed that it would be helpful Policy Colette 184306 particularly Disagree areas. Perhaps more reference to its function within the sub region if greater reference is made to the sub- Adur District Blackett Local could be added with more of a reference to the growth point of regional context, particularly the growth point Council Characteristics Shoreham Harbour. at Shoreham Harbour. Relevant sections of the Proposed Submission Core Strategy will reflect this. Planning and Local Ms Having reviewed your document, I confirm that we have no specific Authority Rachael 316769 All Neutral Noted comments to make of this document at this stage. Liaison Bust Coal Authority It is acknowledged that High Salvington has a distinctive character and a number of The Core Strategy does not appear to make provisions for attractive features. However, the Council developing individual DPDs for areas such as High Salvington which Ms aims to ensure that no insensitive Whole require special protection from intensification of the built environment. Resident Jessica 326395 Disagree development is permitted anywhere within the document residents would ask the Council to give due consideration to Sapphire Borough and it would be wrong to single out a developing an area specific plan to protect the character, green specific area and produce a DPD in this infrastructure and biodiversity of high Salvington. regard. Strategic Objective 6 seeks to deliver high CS Section - Responses What section - Do you of the agree or Organisation Person document are Comments - Do you have any comments on the text, policies, Full Name disagree Council comments - Officer Comments Details ID you making areas of change or options in this section? with the your content of comments this on? section? quality distinctive places and ensure that new development is built to a high standard that enhances the environment and respects the character of the Borough. Furthermore, Strategic Objective 1 seeks to ensure that new development avoids or mitigates any adverse impact on flora and fauna and environmentally sensitive areas. In High Salvington, as elsewehere in the Borough, very careful consideration will be given to the impact of any development proposals on the character of the area. The Core Strategy is the key document in the LDF as, once adopted, it will set out the overall vision and strategy for place-making and it will provide the context for all subsequent Local Development Documents and their policies. However, it should be noted that the detailed work programme is set out within the Local Development Scheme (LDS). It is expected that the LDS will be reviewed in early 2010 when greater clarity on the future work programme beyond the adoption of the Core Strategy will be provided.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • East Worthing Flood Alleviation Scheme Teville Stream – Hydraulic Modelling Report
    East Worthing Flood Alleviation Scheme Teville Stream – Hydraulic Modelling Report November 2011 Environment Agency EW FAS Teville Stream Model Build Report November 2011 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 2 1.1 Background 2 1.2 Objectives 2 1.3 Location 2 1.4 Catchment Description 2 1.5 Topography 3 1.6 Geology 3 2 QUALITATIVE DESCRIPTION OF FLOOD RISK 4 2.1 Sources 4 2.2 Pathways 4 2.3 Receptors 4 3 MODELLING APPROACH AND JUSTIFICATION 6 3.1 Modelling Approach 6 3.2 Modelling Limitations and Uncertainty 6 3.3 Model Accuracy and Appropriateness 6 3.4 Model Verification 6 4 INPUT DATA PLAN 7 4.1 Data Used 7 4.2 Data Quality 7 4.3 Data Uncertainties 7 4.4 Previous Studies 8 5 TECHNICAL METHOD AND IMPLEMENTATION 9 5.1 Hydrology 9 5.2 Hydraulic Modelling 9 5.2.1 Surface Water Modelling 10 5.2.2 Fluvial Modelling 11 5.3 Modelling Results Post-processing 13 6 MODEL PROVING 14 6.1 Run Performance 14 6.1.1 Surface Water Model 14 6.1.2 Fluvial hydraulic model 14 6.2 Model Calibration and Verification 14 6.2.1 Surface Water Model 14 6.2.2 Fluvial hydraulic model 15 6.3 Sensitivity Analysis 15 7 MODEL RESULTS 16 7.1 Model Runs 16 7.2 Model results and flood risk summary 17 8 LIMITATIONS 22 8.1 Model Shortcomings 22 8.2 Model Improvements 22 8.2.1 Surface Water Model 22 8.2.2 Fluvial Model 22 8.3 Further Uses for the Model 23 9 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 24 EW FAS Teville Stream Hydraulic Modelling Report v01.doc ii Environment Agency EW FAS Teville Stream Model Build Report November 2011 Appendices Appendix A – Model User Report Appendix B – Tabulated
    [Show full text]
  • 155 04 SD397 NEECA 2 Schedule 19 Appendix A
    Project Title: East Worthing FAS – Teville Stream Hydraulic Study Project Number: IMSO001181 Project Stage: Initial Assessment Environment Agency Project Manager: Contact Details for EAPM: Address: Telephone: E-mail: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEM: The Teville Stream lies within the town of Worthing, West Sussex. The River Adur Catchment Flood Management Plan (Capita Symonds, 2008) identified possible areas of flood risk, but did not carry out broadscale modelling of the catchment and instead based it’s assessment of risk on the Flood Zone maps. The CFMP states that the current baseline is insufficient to appropriately determine fluvial flood risk within the system. This project seeks to accurately determine the level of fluvial flood risk within the Teville Stream catchment area. The catchment is densely populated with much of the upper area being culverted and integrated with the surface water of the town. The semi-natural part of the upper watercourse is not very well defined, having several tributary streams and agricultural drainage channels. The main channel is a mixture of culverts and open sections, running under and alongside a pharmaceutical works, an industrial estate, historic landfill sites, a public amenity tip and a sewage works, finally emerging in an open channel which enters Brooklands Lake, a public leisure facility/boating lake occupying the area of the former tidal basin. This freshwater lake is maintained artificially by a terminal control structure at the seaward end, which drains into the sea after passing under the A259 seafront road. Flow from the north is augmented by runoff from the A27 highway and is discharged from a retention structure constructed on one of the tributaries.
    [Show full text]
  • TARRING FLOOD ACTION GROUP Rain Garden Proposals
    Active Community Fund GRANT APPLICATION FORM Section D: Your funding application Community Group Tarring Flood Action Group SuDs retro solutions to surface water flooding Project Title recommendations from earlier Feasibility study. Description of issues, needs and/or initiatives Within the West Tarring Conservation Area (See attached supplementary paper -map Appendix 1) there are a number of areas that large amounts of water collects on a regular basis, and more importantly, there have been a number of occasions in the recent past (2000, 2012) when flash floods have badly affected the area, resulting in flooding of, and damage to, a number of residential and commercial properties. Tarring High Street, in the conservation area, has had several floods in recent years and old buildings at the south end of the street and at the north end of South Street / Priory Close have suffered in particular. Following discussions at a TFAG Multi-Agency Meeting, the general consensus is that the floods were caused by a number of contributing factors:- • Climate Change impacting on localised intensity of rainfall • An inability of the network of drains and gullies to cope with heavy downpour events • Blocked drains and gullies • An aging, predominantly combined, surface water and sewage system • Discharge of roof water directly on to pavements/roads • Bow-wave surges caused by uncontrolled through-traffic • The influence of the Teville Stream and its confluence with Broadwater Brook, although this factor is subject to debate. • The lack of empirical data on problem areas of pooling and flooding in the Worthing area. • The dominance of a hard landscape and the lack of any ‘natural’ means of absorbing excessive rainwater before it can develop into flooding.
    [Show full text]
  • Worthing Core Strategy?
    Core Strategy April 2011 Foreword Foreword This Core Strategy was adopted by Worthing Borough Council on 12th April 2011. The document, part of the Local Development Framework (LDF), will help guide planning and development in the Borough for the next 15 years and will be used to inform decision making on all planning applications. Regeneration is the key focus of the document with the strategic development at West Durrington and 12 areas of change identified as major regeneration opportunities. The Core Strategy also outlines how development needs will be met with a series of policies on key issues such as housing, employment, retail and environmental protection. An independent examination of the plan was carried out and the Inspector concluded that, ‘There is a clear vision at the heart of the Core Strategy of a thriving, prosperous and healthy town that plays a central role in the wider sub region.’ The document is the result of a number of years of preparation and consultation and we are really pleased that all the hard work has paid off and the Inspector has approved our plan and has confirmed it is deliverable. The Core Strategy is incredibly important, as it helps us work towards delivering a thriving and stronger Borough. Bryan Turner Cabinet Member for Regeneration Adopted Core Strategy April 2011 1 Foreword 2 Adopted Core Strategy April 2011 Contents Section A - Introduction, Context and Vision 1 Introduction 6 2 Characteristics of the Borough 12 3 Issues and Challenges 20 4 The Vision and Strategic Objectives 32 Section B -
    [Show full text]
  • Part C Infrastructure Delivery Plan
    Residential and or Employment / Commercial use - PDL Sites: Durrington Station 8) Martlets Way - Developer Capacity = 50 units - Realistic Capacity = 50 units. The site also has potential to accommodate 12,000 sqm of office floorspace and 12,000 sqm of industrial space. 9) HMRC Offices, Barrington Road - Developer Capacity = 500 units - Realistic Capacity = 150 units. The site could potneitally accommodated complementary employment. 10) Worthing Leisure Centre - Developer Capacity = 160 units - Realistic Capacity = 160 units * Please note that a windfall allowance / extant planning permissions figure of 2,967 residential units have been identified for the Borough Total Residential - Developer Capacity = 710 units - Realistic Capacity = 360 units Total Employment / Commercial floorspace = 24,000 sqm Scheme / Project Name Scheme description including location Reason for improvement Delivery Lead Delivery Importance to the Local Plan / Prioritisation Status of scheme as at 17 / 18 and commitment Delivery time / phasing Cost Funding Risk / Notes Partner(s) Contingency Critical (C) Essential (E) Desirable (D) Requires Estimated Cost Estimated Funding sources Funding further total Cost reference funding gap information available SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE HEALTH Improvements to Primary Provision of additional Primary Care healthcare facilities at 1 or more GP Required to meet demand arising from development NHS Coastal West Sussex CCG NHS England Critical (C) New schemes Phasing will depend on housing 420,744 NHS health 420,744 Developer contribution 0 Care healthcare facilities surgeries according to patient choice delivery tariff POLICING Officer start-up costs (work stations, radios, protective equipment, The impacts of the proposed quantum of development in the borough is so Police and Crime Commissioner uniforms and bespoke training).
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Ecology Study Addendum
    Landscape Architecture Masterplanning Ecology Landscape and Ecology Study of Greenfield Sites in Worthing Borough ADDENDUM March 2017 Rev B hankinson duckett associates telephone: 01491 838175 email: [email protected] website: www.hda-enviro.co.uk post: The Stables, Howbery Park, Benson Lane, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BA Hankinson Duckett Associates Limited Registered in England & Wales 3462810 Registered Office: The Stables, Howbery Park, Benson Lane, Wallingford, OX10 8BA Landscape and Ecology Study of Greenfield Sites in Worthing - Addendum 2017 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This addendum to the Landscape and Ecology Study of Greenfield Sites in Worthing was prepared by Hankinson Duckett Associates (HDA). The work was commissioned and funded by the joint authority of Adur and Worthing Councils. The work has been guided by Ian Moody, Principal Planning Officer of Adur and Worthing Councils. Landscape and Ecology Study of Greenfield Sites in Worthing - Addendum 2017 CONTENTS Fgures 1 Introduction page 2 Note: Fgures 1 to 26 are contaned wthn the orgnal 2015 report 2 Method Statement page 2 Fig 27 Site Locations page 6 3 Policy Context page 4 Fig 28 Landscape, Heritage and Flood Zone: Site 9 page 7 4 Landscape and Ecology Context page 4 Fig 29 Landscape, Heritage and Flood Zone: Site 10 page 7 5 Site 9: Land East of Titnore Lane page 8 Fig 30 Site 9 Analysis page 8 Site 10: Land at Dale Road page 16 Fig 31 Site 10 Analysis page 16 6 Suitability for Development page 26 Fig 32 Suitability for Development page 27 Appendces Note: Appendces A to D are contaned wthn the orgnal 2015 report E Ecology summaries for sites 9 and 10 Landscape and Ecology Study of Greenfield Sites in Worthing - Addendum 2017 1.
    [Show full text]
  • River Adur Catchment Flood Management Plan
    River Adur Catchment Flood Management Plan September 2008 Environment Agency i River Adur Catchment Flood Management Plan (September 2008) We are the Environment Agency. It’s our job to look after your environment and make it a better place – for you, and for future generations. Your environment is the air you breathe, the water you drink and the ground you walk on. Working with business, Government and society as a whole, we are making your environment cleaner and healthier. The Environment Agency. Out there, making your environment a better place. Published by: Environment Agency Guildbourne House Chatsworth Road Worthing West Sussex BN11 1LD Tel: 01903 832000 © Environment Agency 2008 All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. Environment Agency ii River Adur Catchment Flood Management Plan (September 2008) Foreword I am pleased to be able to introduce the River Adur Catchment Flood Management Plan. Past flood events remind us of the hardship that flooding can cause, especially in the built environment. They also reveal the challenges we face when confronted by the forces of nature. Our aim is to reduce the risk to people, property and the environment. We do this by taking action to manage and reduce the likelihood and consequences of flooding. This is known as ‘flood risk management’. This plan will allow us to understand and describe how the catchment behaves and what the most sustainable flood risk management policies may be over the next 50 to 100 years. We can then use this direction to plan the most acceptable measures to manage flood risk for the long term.
    [Show full text]
  • Adur District Council
    Development Control Sub-Committee 29th June 2011 Agenda Item 4 Ward: ALL Key Decision: Yes / No Report by the Executive Head of Planning, Regeneration and Wellbeing Planning Applications The Committee is requested to consider the following planning applications in accordance with the power contained within section 70 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 which states:- (1) Where an application is made to a local planning authority for planning permission— (a) subject to sections 91 and 92 (time limits), they may grant planning permission, either unconditionally or subject to such conditions as they think fit; or (b) they may refuse planning permission. (2) In dealing with such an application the authority shall have regard to the provisions of the development plan, so far as material to the application, and to any other material considerations. 1 Application Number: WB/10/0852/OUT Recommendation - Members views are requested on this interim report. Site: Teville Gate Proposal: Outline application for the demolition of existing buildings and erection of a mixed use development comprising multi screen cinema, restaurants and cafes, foodstore, hotel, health and fitness centre, offices, multi-function conference and exhibition centre, two residential towers containing 229 apartments together with 19 apartments on a new residential frontage to Teville Road and 12 apartments on a new residential frontage to Broadwater Road, 967 car parking spaces together with a new partially covered pedestrian arcade, landscaping and urban realm and access arrangements. 2 Application Number: WB/11/0249/FULL Recommendation - WB/11/0249/FULL – & WB/11/0250/LBC APPROVE WB/11/0250/LBC – APPROVE Site: The Burlington Hotel Marine Parade Proposal: Resubmission of WB/10/0596/FULL and WB/10/0564/LBC for retention of signage and re-positioning of some existing external lighting.
    [Show full text]
  • Part C Infrastructure Delivery Plan
    Residential - Edge of Town: West Worthing 4) Goring - Ferring Gap - Developer Capacity = 354 units - Realistic Capacity = 0 units 5) Chatsmore Farm - Developer Capacity = 345 units - Realistic Capacity = 0 units * Please note that a windfall allowance / extant planning permissions figure of 2,967 residential units have been identified for the Borough Total Residential - Developer Capacity = 699 units - Realistic Capacity = 0 units Scheme / Project Name Scheme description including location Reason for improvement Delivery Lead Delivery Importance to the Local Plan / Prioritisation Status of scheme as at 17 / 18 Delivery time / phasing Cost Funding Risk / Notes Partner(s) and commitment Contingency Critical (C) Essential (E) Desirable (D) Requires Estimated Cost Estimated Funding sources Funding further total Cost reference funding gap information available SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE POLICING Officer start-up costs (work stations, radios, protective equipment, uniforms and The impacts of the proposed quantum of development in the bespoke training). borough is so significant that they cannot be met without additional staff deployed at a level consistent with the current policing of Policing Worthing. Police and Crime Commissioner £222,641 CIL / Public Funding Staff start-up costs (work stations, radios, protective equipment, uniforms and The impacts of the proposed quantum of development in the bespoke training). borough is so significant that they cannot be met without additional staff deployed at a level consistent with the current policing of Policing Worthing. Police and Crime Commissioner £34,606 CIL / Public Funding Re-provide / relocate Centenary House The impacts of the proposed quantum of development in the borough is so significant that they cannot be met without additional staff deployed at a level consistent with the current policing of Policing Worthing.
    [Show full text]
  • CD03-3 Infrastructure Delivery Plan (2018
    PART B – INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY PLAN (WORKING DRAFT) Position Statements - Baseline This section comprises of position statements which sets out the baseline infrastructure provision, capacity and needs within the borough and therefore have been informed by a review of existing strategies and investment plans prepared by infrastructure providers. The statements sets out information on the following aspects: Lead organisation Main sources of information Existing provision Planned provision Sources of funding and costs Key issues and dependencies Summary and role of Local Plan and IDP Further information The infrastructure types have been categorised under Social Infrastructure, Physical Infrastructure and Green Infrastructure. 1 Social Infrastructure Health and Social Care Primary Care Category Social Infrastructure Type Health and Social Care Provision Primary Care including GP surgeries and dentists Lead Organisation(s) NHS England South NHS Coastal West Sussex Clinical Commissioning Group Main Sources of Delivering the vision: Five Year Strategy & Two Year Operational Plan (May 2015) Information Operational Plan 2017 - 2019 A strategic asset plan is currently being prepared Existing Provision Primary care is the first point of contact for most people and is delivered by a wide range of independent contractors including GPS, Dentists, Pharmacists and Optometrists. Secondary care includes services such as emergency care, community care, planned hospital care, mental health support and learning disability support. NHS England is the national body which receives funding from Government and commission specialist services, most primary care services, and national screening and immunisation programmes. It passes on two thirds of its budget to Local Clinical Commissioning Groups (NHS Coastal West Sussex Clinical Commissioning Group) who commission most services apart from Public Health services which are commissioned by Public Health England and Local Authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Flood Risk Assessment: Volume 2 Technical Report
    Strategic Flood Risk Assessment of West Sussex VOLUME II TECHNICAL REPORT January 2010 successful people successful projects successful performance Issue box The West Sussex Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) is a 'live' document. The current version is developed using the best information and concepts available at the time. As new information and concepts become available the document will be updated and so it is the responsibility of the reader to be satisfied that they are using the most up-to-date information and that the SFRA accounts for this information. All revisions to this document are listed in the table below. Version Issue Date Issued by Issued to Amendments from previous version Draftv1 15/04/2007 Capita West Sussex County Council N/A Symonds Ltd Draft 2 07/06/2007 Capita Discussed with West Sussex West Sussex County Council Symonds Ltd County Council at meeting of general comments same date Final 1 25/01/2008 Capita West Sussex County Council Restructure as per WSCC and Symonds Ltd Environment Agency advice Update 1 12/05/2009 Capita West Sussex County Council Updated with new/ additional Draft v1 Symonds Ltd and Environment Agency flood data Final 26/01/2010 Capita West Sussex County Council West Sussex County Council Update 1 Symonds Ltd and Environment Agency general comments Capita Symonds House Wood Street East Grinstead West Sussex RH19 1UU Tel: 01342 327 161 Fax: 01342 315 927 Project manager: Kristy Chandler Project director: Scott Ferguson www.capitasymonds.co.uk Document management system Job Number: CS/36568 PD: SF PM: KLC Report status: Final Update 1 Date of issue: 26/01/2010 Main author(s): ER/KLC Checked: SF Approved: SF Contents Foreword ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • By Email Only [email protected] DRAFT LOCAL PLAN for WORTHING – CONSULTATION DOCUMENT OCTOBER 2018 the Su
    By email only [email protected] Contact: Laura Brook Direct Dial: 01273 497508 E-mail: [email protected] Date: 12 December 18 DRAFT LOCAL PLAN FOR WORTHING – CONSULTATION DOCUMENT OCTOBER 2018 The Sussex Wildlife Trust (SWT) recognises the importance of a plan led system as opposed to a developer led process and supports Worthing Borough Council’s (WBC) desire to produce a cohesive Local Plan. Therefore we hope that our comments are used constructively to make certain that this draft plan properly plans for the natural capital needed within the Borough and ensures that any development is truly sustainable. Where we are proposing a change to policy or the supporting text, recommended additions are highlighted in bold and deletions are struck through. Part 1 - Introduction SWT supports the inclusion of the social, economic and environmental tables on pages 7- 9. It provides some interesting contextual information for people who may not be familiar with the area. Reading through the plan we were surprised that section 1.38, which refers to the West Sussex Joint Strategic Needs Assessment, does not list the importance of the natural environment in promoting positive physical and mental health and a good quality of life. However, we do recognise that the paragraph goes on to state that the Local Plan will seek to address access to the natural environment through policies. We are supportive of paragraph 1.39 which gives recognition to the challenge WBC will face in terms of climate change resilience. Vision The visions proposed in the draft plan should be ambitious in their intention to add to the Natural Capital of the Borough over the lifetime of the plan.
    [Show full text]