DOCSLIB.ORG

Strategic Flood Risk Assessment: Volume 2 Technical Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Strategic Flood Risk Assessment of West Sussex VOLUME II TECHNICAL REPORT January 2010 successful people successful projects successful performance Issue box The West Sussex Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) is a 'live' document. The current version is developed using the best information and concepts available at the time. As new information and concepts become available the document will be updated and so it is the responsibility of the reader to be satisfied that they are using the most up-to-date information and that the SFRA accounts for this information. All revisions to this document are listed in the table below. Version Issue Date Issued by Issued to Amendments from previous version Draftv1 15/04/2007 Capita West Sussex County Council N/A Symonds Ltd Draft 2 07/06/2007 Capita Discussed with West Sussex West Sussex County Council Symonds Ltd County Council at meeting of general comments same date Final 1 25/01/2008 Capita West Sussex County Council Restructure as per WSCC and Symonds Ltd Environment Agency advice Update 1 12/05/2009 Capita West Sussex County Council Updated with new/ additional Draft v1 Symonds Ltd and Environment Agency flood data Final 26/01/2010 Capita West Sussex County Council West Sussex County Council Update 1 Symonds Ltd and Environment Agency general comments Capita Symonds House Wood Street East Grinstead West Sussex RH19 1UU Tel: 01342 327 161 Fax: 01342 315 927 Project manager: Kristy Chandler Project director: Scott Ferguson www.capitasymonds.co.uk Document management system Job Number: CS/36568 PD: SF PM: KLC Report status: Final Update 1 Date of issue: 26/01/2010 Main author(s): ER/KLC Checked: SF Approved: SF Contents Foreword ................................................................................................................... a 1. Introduction................................................................................................... 1-1 2. Flood defences and assets.......................................................................... 2-1 3. Flood warning and emergency plans.......................................................... 3-1 4. Flooding from rivers..................................................................................... 4-1 5. Flooding from the sea .................................................................................. 5-1 6. Flooding from land ....................................................................................... 6-1 7. Flooding from groundwater......................................................................... 7-1 8. Flooding from sewers .................................................................................. 8-1 9. Flooding from artificial sources .................................................................. 9-1 Glossary and notation............................................................................................... i Contents Foreword ................................................................................................................... a 1. Introduction................................................................................................... 1-1 2. Flood defences and assets.......................................................................... 2-1 3. Flood warning and emergency plans.......................................................... 3-1 4. Flooding from rivers..................................................................................... 4-1 5. Flooding from the sea .................................................................................. 5-1 6. Flooding from land ....................................................................................... 6-1 7. Flooding from groundwater......................................................................... 7-1 8. Flooding from sewers .................................................................................. 8-1 9. Flooding from artificial sources .................................................................. 9-1 Glossary and notation............................................................................................... i Annex A - Maps Background maps Overview Map O - Overview of West Sussex County, including existing sites and sites of search Management Map M1 - Areas covered by Catchment Flood Management Plans (CFMPs) and Shoreline Management Plans (SMP) Map M2 - Existing flood management policies across West Sussex Map M3 - Location of existing hydraulic model extents across West Sussex Flood defences and flood warning Map D - System Asset Management Plan areas and Flood Defences Map W - Environment Agency flood warning areas Sequential Test Flooding from rivers (fluvial) Map F1-F - Fluvial Flood Zones (no defences) Map C2-F - Fluvial Flood Zones with climate change (no defences) Flooding from the sea (tidal) Map F1-T - Sea flood zones (flooding without flood defences) Map C2-T - Extent of flooding from rivers with allowance for climate change Flooding from land Map L - Areas prone to flooding from land Flooding from groundwater Map G - Land more prone to groundwater flooding Flooding from sewers Map S - Historic incidents of sewer flooding Flooding from artificial sources Map R - Location of potential artificial sources of flooding Exception Test Flooding from rivers (fluvial) Map A1-F - Actual and residual risk of flooding from rivers (extent) Map A2-F - Depth of actual flooding from rivers Map C1-F - Extent of flooding from rivers with allowance for climate change Flooding from the sea (tidal) Map A1-T - Extent of actual flooding from the sea Map A2-T - Depth of actual flooding from the sea Map C1-T - Extent of flooding from rivers with allowance for climate change Map B - Locations where breach assessments may be required Foreword Foreword West Sussex County Council (WSCC) is required to prepare a Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) to support the development of their Minerals and Waste Development Framework (MWDF). In doing so, they will be able to demonstrate that they have applied a risk-based sequential approach in preparing the framework, as required by Planning Policy Statement 25: Development and Flood Risk (PPS25). The main objective of the SFRA is to provide flood information: • so that an evidence based and risk based sequential approach can be adopted when making planning decisions, in line with PPS25; • that is strategic in that it covers a wide spatial area and looks at flood risk today and in the future; • that supports sustainability appraisals of the local development frameworks; and • that identifies what further investigations may be required in flood risk assessments for specific development proposals. A Level 1 SFRA has been undertaken over the whole of the county. Additional information, that would normally be included in a Level 2 SFRA, has been supplied at key locations. The approach for undertaking the SFRA is consistent with relevant planning guidance and has been discussed with the Environment Agency and WSCC throughout development. The SFRA is primarily based on existing information, however some new modelling and analyses have been undertaken where existing information was not available. These additional analyses were presented to the Environment Agency for discussion and agreement during the scoping stage. As it is not practical to undertake a highly detailed assessment across the whole of the county, a balance has been made between accuracy of results and cost effectiveness. The SFRA is presented in a number of documents: • VOLUME I – decision support document • VOLUME II – technical report and maps • VOLUME III – management guide • VOLUME IV – sites of search (Part A - Minerals sites, Part B - Waste sites) The SFRA is a live document which is intended to be updated as new information and guidance become available. The outcomes and conclusions of the SFRA may not be valid in the event of future changes. It is the responsibility of the user to ensure they are using the best available information. West Sussex SFRA (January 2010) a Volume II - Technical Report Introduction 1. Introduction West Sussex SFRA (January 2010) 1-1 Volume II - Technical Report Introduction Purpose of this report 1.1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessments (SFRAs) provide flood risk information which can inform a range of activities, such as land use planning, emergency planning, development control and the development of specific flood risk management policy. 1.2 This West Sussex SFRA has been developed to inform the county wide Minerals and Waste Development Framework (MWDF). The SFRA must be robust and be evidence-based so that it does not leave planning decisions and land allocations open to challenge through the land use planning process. For this reason, it is crucial that there is transparency in the data and methods used in the assessment. 1.3 This report represents Volume II of the SFRA, containing all of the technical information and methods used in the assessment of flood risk across West Sussex. It includes information on the sources and reliability of data, methods used in the assessment, discussions regarding uncertainty, and key assumptions made. 1.4 To ensure that the technical information is easily updated when new assessments are undertaken in the future, the six ‘sources of flooding’ have been reported in stand alone chapters. Volume I contains a summary of flood risk across West Sussex. The maps generated during the assessment are provided in Annex A. 1.5 The user is referred to Volumes I and III for guidance on how to interpret
Recommended publications
  • Boating on Sussex Rivers

    Boating on Sussex Rivers

    K1&A - Soo U n <zj r \ I A t 1" BOATING ON SUSSEX RIVERS NRA National Rivers Authority Southern Region Guardians of the Water Environment BOATING ON SUSSEX RIVERS Intro duction NRA The Sussex Rivers have a unique appeal, with their wide valleys giving spectacular views of Chalk Downs within sight and smell of the sea. There is no better way to enjoy their natural beauty and charm than by boat. A short voyage inland can reveal some of the most attractive and unspoilt scenery in the Country. The long tidal sections, created over the centuries by flashy Wealden Rivers carving through the soft coastal chalk, give public rights of navigation well into the heartland of Sussex. From Rye in the Eastern part of the County, small boats can navigate up the River Rother to Bodiam with its magnificent castle just 16 miles from the sea. On the River Arun, in an even shorter distance from Littlehampton Harbour, lies the historic city of Arundel in the heart of the Duke of Norfolk’s estate. But for those with more energetic tastes, Sussex rivers also have plenty to offer. Increased activity by canoeists, especially by Scouting and other youth organisations has led to the setting up of regular canoe races on the County’s rivers in recent years. CARING FOR OUR WATERWAYS The National Rivers Authority welcomes all river users and seeks their support in preserving the tranquillity and charm of the Sussex rivers. This booklet aims to help everyone to enjoy their leisure activities in safety and to foster good relations and a spirit of understanding between river users.
  • East Worthing Flood Alleviation Scheme Teville Stream – Hydraulic Modelling Report

    East Worthing Flood Alleviation Scheme Teville Stream – Hydraulic Modelling Report

    East Worthing Flood Alleviation Scheme Teville Stream – Hydraulic Modelling Report November 2011 Environment Agency EW FAS Teville Stream Model Build Report November 2011 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 2 1.1 Background 2 1.2 Objectives 2 1.3 Location 2 1.4 Catchment Description 2 1.5 Topography 3 1.6 Geology 3 2 QUALITATIVE DESCRIPTION OF FLOOD RISK 4 2.1 Sources 4 2.2 Pathways 4 2.3 Receptors 4 3 MODELLING APPROACH AND JUSTIFICATION 6 3.1 Modelling Approach 6 3.2 Modelling Limitations and Uncertainty 6 3.3 Model Accuracy and Appropriateness 6 3.4 Model Verification 6 4 INPUT DATA PLAN 7 4.1 Data Used 7 4.2 Data Quality 7 4.3 Data Uncertainties 7 4.4 Previous Studies 8 5 TECHNICAL METHOD AND IMPLEMENTATION 9 5.1 Hydrology 9 5.2 Hydraulic Modelling 9 5.2.1 Surface Water Modelling 10 5.2.2 Fluvial Modelling 11 5.3 Modelling Results Post-processing 13 6 MODEL PROVING 14 6.1 Run Performance 14 6.1.1 Surface Water Model 14 6.1.2 Fluvial hydraulic model 14 6.2 Model Calibration and Verification 14 6.2.1 Surface Water Model 14 6.2.2 Fluvial hydraulic model 15 6.3 Sensitivity Analysis 15 7 MODEL RESULTS 16 7.1 Model Runs 16 7.2 Model results and flood risk summary 17 8 LIMITATIONS 22 8.1 Model Shortcomings 22 8.2 Model Improvements 22 8.2.1 Surface Water Model 22 8.2.2 Fluvial Model 22 8.3 Further Uses for the Model 23 9 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 24 EW FAS Teville Stream Hydraulic Modelling Report v01.doc ii Environment Agency EW FAS Teville Stream Model Build Report November 2011 Appendices Appendix A – Model User Report Appendix B – Tabulated
  • Dear Consultee PUBLIC CONSULTATION on THE

    Dear Consultee PUBLIC CONSULTATION on THE

    Dear Consultee PUBLIC CONSULTATION ON THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE DOMESTIC SAFETY MANAGEMENT REGIME Introduction In 2001 Domestic Safety Management (DSM) was introduced by the Merchant Shipping (Domestic Passenger Ships) (Safety Management Code) Regulations 2001 (Statutory Instrument, SI 2001/3209). The DSM Code requires operators of domestic passenger ships to have a safety management system tailored to their specific operations. This safety management system should include: A health and safety policy Procedures to ensure the safe operation of ships with relevant duties Lines of communication between personnel ashore and afloat Procedures for reporting accidents Procedures for responding to emergency situations The DSM Code was developed to establish a common standard for the safe operation of passenger ships engaged on domestic (operating only in UK waters) trade and it applies to ships of Classes III, IV, V, VI and VI(A)1 and those certified under the Merchant Shipping (Passenger Ships) (Safety Code for UK Categorised Waters) Regulations 20102 (SI 2010/680). The objectives of safety management require the shipping company to apply simple and cost effect means of ensuring safety on board ships; preventing human injury and loss of life; and complying with applicable regulations and rules. No two ship operations are the same, and ships vary significantly in size and are employed under a wide range of different locations and conditions. The general principles to the safe operation of ships are consistent however, and can be expressed in such terms that they can be applied to a wide variety of ships. The proposed changes and rationale Existing legislation requires each UK domestic passenger ship to be audited for compliance with the DSM Code twice each year, whereas UK internationally operating passenger ships are only audited for compliance with the International Safety Management (ISM) Code twice in every five year period.
  • Arun Valley Flood Risk Management Changes: a Summary of Consultation Responses Appendix a Responses Have Been Redacted to Remove Personal Data

    Arun Valley Flood Risk Management Changes: a Summary of Consultation Responses Appendix a Responses Have Been Redacted to Remove Personal Data

    Arun Valley flood risk management changes: a summary of consultation responses Appendix A Responses have been redacted to remove personal data. customer service line 03708 506 506 floodline 03459 88 11 88 incident hotline 0800 80 70 60 Responder 1 customer service line 03708 506 506 floodline 03459 88 11 88 incident hotline 0800 80 70 60 Responder 2 customer service line 03708 506 506 floodline 03459 88 11 88 incident hotline 0800 80 70 60 From: [mailto @westsussex.gov.uk] Sent: 09 December 2019 14:01 To: Willway, Teresa <teresa.willway@environment‐agency.gov.uk> Cc: < @westsussex.gov.uk>; < @westsussex.gov.uk>; < @westsussex.gov.uk> Subject: RE: Consultation on implementation of LTRAS in SU1 Dear Teresa, Please find the following comments outlined below by the respective departments in relation to the implementation of LTRAS in SU1. As you will see there are no extensive concerns the time taken to reply has specifically been associated with chasing up particular functions of interest here at WSCC. LLFA – Contacts / “The Lead Local Flood Authority have no concerns at this point in time with the EA’s intention to implement LTRAS within SU1. It will continue to undertake its requirements and statutory duties within its remit as ‘the Risk Management Authority (RMA)’ described within the Flood & Water Management Act 2010. WSCC Place Services Directorate, as a whole, will be made aware of any transfer or extension of its current riparian responsibilities”. WSCC Highways Drainage – Contact “There are no concerns at this time with respect highways drainage and to the implementation of LTRAS in SU1” WSCC Structures Team – Contact “We are concerned that these changes will affect Stopham Bridge, a Grade I Listed Scheduled Ancient Monument.
  • 155 04 SD397 NEECA 2 Schedule 19 Appendix A

    155 04 SD397 NEECA 2 Schedule 19 Appendix A

    Project Title: East Worthing FAS – Teville Stream Hydraulic Study Project Number: IMSO001181 Project Stage: Initial Assessment Environment Agency Project Manager: Contact Details for EAPM: Address: Telephone: E-mail: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEM: The Teville Stream lies within the town of Worthing, West Sussex. The River Adur Catchment Flood Management Plan (Capita Symonds, 2008) identified possible areas of flood risk, but did not carry out broadscale modelling of the catchment and instead based it’s assessment of risk on the Flood Zone maps. The CFMP states that the current baseline is insufficient to appropriately determine fluvial flood risk within the system. This project seeks to accurately determine the level of fluvial flood risk within the Teville Stream catchment area. The catchment is densely populated with much of the upper area being culverted and integrated with the surface water of the town. The semi-natural part of the upper watercourse is not very well defined, having several tributary streams and agricultural drainage channels. The main channel is a mixture of culverts and open sections, running under and alongside a pharmaceutical works, an industrial estate, historic landfill sites, a public amenity tip and a sewage works, finally emerging in an open channel which enters Brooklands Lake, a public leisure facility/boating lake occupying the area of the former tidal basin. This freshwater lake is maintained artificially by a terminal control structure at the seaward end, which drains into the sea after passing under the A259 seafront road. Flow from the north is augmented by runoff from the A27 highway and is discharged from a retention structure constructed on one of the tributaries.
  • TARRING FLOOD ACTION GROUP Rain Garden Proposals

    TARRING FLOOD ACTION GROUP Rain Garden Proposals

    Active Community Fund GRANT APPLICATION FORM Section D: Your funding application Community Group Tarring Flood Action Group SuDs retro solutions to surface water flooding Project Title recommendations from earlier Feasibility study. Description of issues, needs and/or initiatives Within the West Tarring Conservation Area (See attached supplementary paper -map Appendix 1) there are a number of areas that large amounts of water collects on a regular basis, and more importantly, there have been a number of occasions in the recent past (2000, 2012) when flash floods have badly affected the area, resulting in flooding of, and damage to, a number of residential and commercial properties. Tarring High Street, in the conservation area, has had several floods in recent years and old buildings at the south end of the street and at the north end of South Street / Priory Close have suffered in particular. Following discussions at a TFAG Multi-Agency Meeting, the general consensus is that the floods were caused by a number of contributing factors:- • Climate Change impacting on localised intensity of rainfall • An inability of the network of drains and gullies to cope with heavy downpour events • Blocked drains and gullies • An aging, predominantly combined, surface water and sewage system • Discharge of roof water directly on to pavements/roads • Bow-wave surges caused by uncontrolled through-traffic • The influence of the Teville Stream and its confluence with Broadwater Brook, although this factor is subject to debate. • The lack of empirical data on problem areas of pooling and flooding in the Worthing area. • The dominance of a hard landscape and the lack of any ‘natural’ means of absorbing excessive rainwater before it can develop into flooding.
  • Beach Recharge in Sussex & East Kent

    Beach Recharge in Sussex & East Kent

    BEACH RECHARGE IN SUSSEX & EAST KENT: A PRELIMINARY INVENTORY & OVERVIEW Compiled by R. Williams, edited by C. Moses. Not to be quoted without permission 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................1 2 Inventory of beach recharge schemes ..............................................................................5 3 Notes and sources ............................................................................................................9 4 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................17 5 References......................................................................................................................21 1 Introduction Sand and shingle are being lost from many beaches in Sussex and Kent as a result of natural coastal processes as well as ill-designed sea defence and coastal protection schemes. To counteract falling beach levels, the Environment Agency and local authorities are increasingly resorting to “topping-up” the beaches with additional sand and shingle. Several terms are currently employed to refer to the artificial provision of extra beach material, but there is disagreement about their precise definition. For the purpose of this report, beach nourishment (or beach replenishment) is defined as the supply of material that has been dredged from the seabed or extracted from inland sand and gravel pits. Beach recycling is defined as the removal
  • Sussex Industrial Archaeology Society Newsletter Number 143 July 2009

    Sussex Industrial Archaeology Society Newsletter Number 143 July 2009

    Sussex Industrial Archaeology Society - Newsletter Sussex Industrial Archaeology Society Newsletter Number 143 July 2009 Society Chairman, John Blackwell, driving the golden spike on the section of restored track on the northern abutment of the former Selsey Tramway bridge over the Portsmouth and Arundel Canal near Hunston, south of Chichester. See report inside. (Martin Snow) 1 Sussex Industrial Archaeology Society - Newsletter Newsletter 143 Contents July 2009 New Edition of : The History of Chichester’s Canal .................................... 2 Editorial .......................................................................................................... 3 Forthcoming SIAS Events ............................................................................. 3 Events from other Societies........................................................................... 4 SERIAC 2009 ................................................................................................ 6 Part of the Selsey Tramway Reborn ............................................................. 9 De Witt Kilns ............................................................................................... 10 Another Arun bridge to be replaced ............................................................ 12 Update: North Stoke Suspension Footbridge ............................................... 15 The dig for Casher Bridge at Chishester Marina ........................................ 16 Request for information ..............................................................................
  • Worthing Core Strategy?

    Worthing Core Strategy?

    Core Strategy April 2011 Foreword Foreword This Core Strategy was adopted by Worthing Borough Council on 12th April 2011. The document, part of the Local Development Framework (LDF), will help guide planning and development in the Borough for the next 15 years and will be used to inform decision making on all planning applications. Regeneration is the key focus of the document with the strategic development at West Durrington and 12 areas of change identified as major regeneration opportunities. The Core Strategy also outlines how development needs will be met with a series of policies on key issues such as housing, employment, retail and environmental protection. An independent examination of the plan was carried out and the Inspector concluded that, ‘There is a clear vision at the heart of the Core Strategy of a thriving, prosperous and healthy town that plays a central role in the wider sub region.’ The document is the result of a number of years of preparation and consultation and we are really pleased that all the hard work has paid off and the Inspector has approved our plan and has confirmed it is deliverable. The Core Strategy is incredibly important, as it helps us work towards delivering a thriving and stronger Borough. Bryan Turner Cabinet Member for Regeneration Adopted Core Strategy April 2011 1 Foreword 2 Adopted Core Strategy April 2011 Contents Section A - Introduction, Context and Vision 1 Introduction 6 2 Characteristics of the Borough 12 3 Issues and Challenges 20 4 The Vision and Strategic Objectives 32 Section B -
  • Southampton Canal Society Newsletter

    Southampton Canal Society Newsletter

    June 1998 Issue 321 The Southampton Canal Society is very pleased to welcome the Day-Star Theatre company to perform for us as part of their 1998 Waterways Tour. The Company that time they have developed a unique style of informal Duffy Marshall known on the cut by his real name Pete comedy theatre which is often performed in whatever but professionally as Duffy. Trained as a drama available space there is in canalside pubs or at teacher and as well as performing he writes all Day- festivals. Their satirical plays are inspired by life on the Star music and scripts. His most recent television waterways but reflect the lives of people everywhere appearances have been in ‘Watching’, ‘Coronation using the highly individual background of the canals Street’ and ‘Brookside’. past and present. Involving many characters the plays are usually performed by just two actors, few props and Jane Marshall as well as performing with Day-Star a minimum of costume and they will take with them the from the beginning has appeared in the film ‘Robin audience, their imaginations, the pub and anything that Hood’, and in ‘Brookside’ and paints traditional just happens to be passing by on a very unusual canalware for canalside shops and gift shops theatrical journey. throughout the country. When not touring the canals and rivers in their current In 1977 Jane and Duffy Marshall moved on board an narrow boat, the ‘Angry Bull’, Day-Star are based at old wooden narrow boat called Day-Star. By 1982 they Audlem in South Cheshire on the Shropshire Union were touring with Day-Star Theatre and this year are on Canal where they also run their school theatre tours their seventeenth summer Waterways Tour.
  • ANGLO-SAXON BURY Anglo-Saxon Bury an Early Medieval Port?

    ANGLO-SAXON BURY Anglo-Saxon Bury an Early Medieval Port?

    Research ANGLO-SAXON BURY Anglo-Saxon Bury An Early Medieval Port? ocated in the picturesque Arun LValley, the small village of Bury may have a hidden past as an Anglo- Saxon port. Initially, this seems rather far-fetched considering Bury’s current inland position in Sussex (Fig.1.), but one must consider that the coastline and river courses were signi cantly different in the 10th and 11th centuries. Not only were the coastal estuaries far more accessible, but river channels were wider and more liable to ooding (Robinson, An Historical Atlas of Sussex). River access to Bury via the River Arun was far from impossible in Anglo-Saxon Sussex. Indeed, this argument follows on A photograph of the old ferry at Bury taken c.1902, which illustrates the proximity of the village to the from what Ann Best maintained river. Photo: © www.gravelroots.net in her article on Romano-British the possessor of thirteen estates Weald; this area was signi cantly Waterways (SPP 139, Aug 2016); in Sussex, the core of which were forested and rather inaccessible that these watercourses were around Lewes and Eastbourne. during the period (Brandon, The commonly utilised. Indeed, apart from Bury and the South Saxons). However, its status as a Hundred meeting place must surely be of some in uence to its royal proprietorship. A Hundred was a measure of land and an area served by the Hundred Court. This assembled on a monthly basis from the tenth century onwards, according to the Hundred Ordinance. James Campbell has argued that there was a deliberate tenth-century policy of ‘extending the weight of royal government to the countryside’ through this Hundred system (Campbell, The Fig.1.
  • Ihe Chichester Ship Canal Chichester Canal Restoration

    Ihe Chichester Ship Canal Chichester Canal Restoration

    THURSDAY 30th. JUNE 7.30pm TALK usED STAMPS, PRTNTER CARTRTDGES, Ihe Chichester Ship Canal Chichester Canal Restoration. An update on the Old or Foreign COINS If you have any spare time and want to make restoration of the canal from Chichester to the sea. UK, Foreign stamps and empty print cartridges can be converted into money! Please leave any new friends and help to improve our At the Council Chamber, West S.C.C. West Street, donations of these items at the Canal Basin Shop environment why not join our friendly bunch Chichester. Tickets f3.00 on the door. for the attention of Linda Wilkinson or post to r of volunteers by helping to staffthe shop or SATURDAY 9th JULY 7.30pm Mikron Theatre Chidham lane, Chidham, Cfiichester POr8 8TL crewthe boats. Please join us to help you in a production of Hell and High Water. At How to find the canal basin... fulfilling way by teaching you new skills. Donnington Parish Hall, Stockbridge Road, By foot from the City Centre walk down South Call Alison or24g 596993 Chichester. Tickets f7.50. the level crossing, the Canal is Street and cross WIIAT'S ON AT THE CAI\AL IN ZOTT Sponsored by Linden Homes. one minute south of the Bus & Rail Stations. The entrance to the canal basin is on Canal Scheduled trips: SUNDAY 10th JULY l0am start. A linear Wharf, just after the Waterside pub. The narrowboat'Egremontt seats up to tz Salterns GUIDED WALK from Lock by If you are coming by car, there are several public passengers.