DOCSLIB.ORG

Resource-Partitioning Between Three Syntopic Thornbills (Acanthizidae: Acanthiza Vigors and Horsfield)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Resource-Partitioning Between Three Syntopic Thornbills (Acanthizidae: Acanthiza Vigors and Horsfield) RESOURCE-PARTITIONING BETWEEN THREE SYNTOPIC THORNBILLS (ACANTHIZIDAE: ACANTHIZA VIGORS AND HORSFIELD) HENRY LAWRIE BELL (B.App.Sc., Canberra College of Advanced Education; M.Sc., University of Papua New Guinea) A Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The University of New England January 1983 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF PLATES LIST OF APPENDICES ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Chapter 1 1-7 PART I Environment, Availability of Food, and the Bird Community Chapter 2 The Environment 8-33 Chapter 3 Availability of Arthropods 33-47 Chapter 4 The Bird Community 48-52 PART II Social Organization of Thornbills Chapter 5 Social and Territorial Organization 53-88 Chapter 6 Mixed-species Flocks of Insectivorous Birds 89-106 PART III Foraging Behaviour Chapter 7 Substrate Foraged Upon by Thornbills 107-125 Chapter 8 Plant Species Foraged Upon by Thornbills 126-153 Chapter 9 Vertical Distribution 154-174 Chapter 10 Foraging Method 175-189 Chapter 11 Diet 190-204 Chapter 12 Morphology 205-220 PART V Chapter 13 Food Limitations in Thornbills 221-241 Chapter 14 General Summary 242-248 REFERENCES 249-272 APPENDICES iv LIST OF TABLES Number Page Table 1. Results of Transect Counts of Vegetation at Wollomombi 18 Showing Percentage of Numbers and Canopy Cover by Plant Species, and the Extent of Defoliation During Drought. Table 2. Mean Density of Plant Species at Study Area, Wollomombi 19 (individuals/ha) (data from point-centred quarter sampling method). Table 3. Proportions, by Height Categories, of Volume of Foliage 20 of Plant Species at Study Area (died or defoliated shown in brackets). Table 4. Proportions, by Eucalypt Species, of Trunk Bark Available 22 to Birds; and of Trunk Sizes by dbh at Wollomombi. Table 5. Seasonal Abundance of Arthropods Inside and on the 46 Surface of Bark of Eucalypts at Wollomombi, 1978/79. (Data supplied by R.A. Noske). Table 6. Distribution, by Months, of Agonistic Displays and 61 Breeding Records of Brown Thornbills at Wollomombi, and Division of Labour at the Nest. Table 7. Distribution, by Months, of Agonistic Displays and 69 Breeding Records of Buff-rumped Thornbills at Wollomombi and Division of Labour at the Nest. Table 8. Distribution, by Months, of Agonistic Displays and 77 Breeding Records of Striated Thornbills at Wollomombi, and Division of Labour at the Nest. Table 9. Interactions (see paragraph 111) in Mixed-species 98 Feeding Flocks, Between Thornbills and Other Species. Table 10. Composition, by Time, of a MSF Following Buff-rumped 101 Thornbills 2 July 1979 (see Figure 32b). v. Number Page Table 11. Differences Between Mean Annual and Seasonal 117 Frequencies of Use of Substrate by Thornbills. Significance Values and Direction of the Seasonal Value from the Mean (+: higher than mean, -: lower than mean) are shown. 2 Table 12. Significance by X Test (d.f.l) for Increases 133 Between Seasonal Use of Plant Species for Foraging by Thornbills Against Mean Values for Each Plant Species Over the Whole Study Period. Table 13. Preferences of Brown Thornbills for Plant Species 134 Compared with Frequency of Plant Species in Study Area. Table 14. Preferences of Buff-rumped Thornbills for Plant 138 Species Compared with Frequency of Plant Species in the Study Area at Wollomombi. Table 15. Preferences of Striated Thornbills for Plant 139 Species Compared with Frequency of Plant Species in the Study Area at Wollomombi. Table 16. Preferences of Brown Thornbills for Different 143 Groups of Eucalypts. Table 17. Preferences of Buff-rumped Thornbills for Different 144 Groups of Eucalypts. Table 18. Preferences of Striated Thornbills for Different 145 Groups of Eucalypts. Table 19. Foraging by Thornbills on Main Groups of Eucalypts, 146 When in MSF and Overall (including MSF). 2 Table 20. Significance, by X Test (d.f. 1) of Foraging by 160 Thornbills, by Seasons, at Heights More Frequently Than Expected, 1978/81. vi Number Page Table 21. Proportions of Foliage at Wollomombi, by Height 165 Categories, Compared to the Frequency of Observat- ion of Thornbills in those Categories. Table 22. Frequency of Foraging by Thornbills on the Foliage 168 of Plant Species Below 2m in Height and the Availability of Foliage at that Level. Table 23. Mean Numbers and Biomass (per 10 ha) by Height 172 Distribution of Insectivorous Birds at Wollomombi, 1978-81. 2 Table 24. Significance, by X Test (d.f. 1) of Foraging Methods 179 Used by Thornbills, by Seasons, at Wollomombi, 1978-81. Table 25. Distribution (%) of Observations of Thornbills at 181 Wollomombi 1978-1981, by Substrate and Foraging Method Used. Table 26. Distribution (%) of Observations of Thornbills at 182 Wollomombi 1978-81, by Plant Species and Foraging Method Used. Table 27. Significance Levels (by Wilcoxsons Sum of Ranks Test) 185 of Differences by Time of Day in Speeds and Distance Covered by Thornbills in Foraging. Table 28. Prey Items of Thornbills at Wollomombi Identified 198 by Direct Observation. Table 29. Behaviour of Thornbills at Wollomombi When Offered 199 Sugared Water. Table 30. Differences in Stomach Contents of Thornbills 201 Between Warmer Months (October-March) and Cooler Months (April-September). vii Number Page Table 31. Results of Comparisons of Morphological Data Between 213 Species Pairs of Thornbills (each pair compared by T-test except where otherwise shown; *: Mann-Whitney U-test; : mere comparison of means for each species). Table 32. Results of Grasping-strength Tests on Thornbills at 214 Wollomombi (value for each individual in g). Table 33. Comparison of the Seasons of 1978/79 in Which Each 227 Thornbill Species Carried out its Specialised Foraging Behaviour Significantly More Than Expected, and the Availability of Arthropods by Seasons. Table 34. Comparisons, by T-test, of Mean Overlaps and S.D. 228 Between Thornbill Species in Months of Scarce and Abundant Resources. Table 35. Percentage Overlaps in Foraging Between Species Pairs 232 of Thornbills Compared When in and When Not in MSF. viii LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1. Study Areas at Wollomombi Falls Reserve of R.A. Noske 10 and L. Huddy (Edgaris Spur and Quail Thrush Spur) and H.L. Bell (EdgaA Spur). Figure 2. Mean monthly maximum and minimum temperatures, Monthly 12 and mean monthly rainfall, monthly Plant Growth Index and monthly Leaf Growth Index at Wollomombi Falls Reserve (September 1978 to August 1981). Figure 3. Distribution, by height categories, of foliage present 17 at Wollomombi showing proportions killed or defoliated by drought. Figure 4. Cross-section of bark on trunks, at breast height, 23 of three Eucalyptus spp. (life-size). Figure 5. Leaves of (a) Stringybark Eucalyptus caliginosa, 26 (b) Box, E. sp. aff. cypellocarpa, (c) Gum, E.viminalis, (d) bipinnate Acacia., A. irrorata. Figure 6. Leaves of (a) Cassinia quinquefaria, (b) Olearia viscidula, 27 (c) Jacksonia scoparia, and (d) Exocarpos cupressiformis. Figure 7. Monthly biomass (mg wet weight/1000g foliage) of arthropods38 taken from grass sweeps and foliage sampling at Wollomombi, September 1978-August 1981. Figure 8. Monthly biomass (mg wet weight/1000g of foliage) of 39 arthropod samples taken from eucalypts, bipinnate Acacia, Olearia, Exocarpos, Jacksonia and Cassinia at Wollomombi, September 1978-August 1981 . Figure 9. Monthly biomass (mg wet weight/1000g of foliage) of 41 Coleoptera, Hemiptera, Formicoidea and Araneidea taken in foliage samples at Wollomombi, September 1978-August 19 81 . Figure 10. Monthly biomass (mg wet weight/100 X 2 m grass sweeps) 42 of Araneidea, Hymenoptera, Diptera and Lepidoptera taken in grass sweeps at Wollomombi, September 1978-August 1981 . ix Page Figure 11. Proportions of arthropods, by lengths, taken in foliage 44 samples and grass sweeps at Wollomombi. Figure 12. Monthly mean lengths of arthropods taken on grass sweeps 45 and on foliage samples of eucalypts, bipinnate Acacia, OZearia and Jacksonia at Wollomombi, September 1978- August 1981). Figure 13. Mean monthly biomass of all insectivores at Wollomombi 50 (13a) mean daily energy demand of insectivores compared with arthropod samples (13W-; Resource demand (Kjoules/ 10 ha per mg arthropods/1000 g of foliage) and distribution of breeding records of insectivores at Wollomombi(13c). Figure 14. Percentage occurrences, by months (September 1978-August 56 1981), of Brown Thornbills by size of party (total n: 4656 individuals, monthly range 63-112). Figure 15. Territories of Brown Thornbills at Wollomombi, 1978/79, 58 1979/80, 1980/81 (September-August) and 1981/82 (September-February). Letters denote colour-banded birds. Top bird of each pair is female. (Note: BuR daughter of YY, BuW son of LB). Figure 16. Inverse correlation (r: 0.855, P: < 0.01) between 59 frequency of observed agonistic encounters by Brown Thornbills against colour-banded neighbours and length of territorial boundary. Letters identify females, number in brackets: number of breeding seasons. Figure 17. Sizes of Brown Thornbills territories at Wollomombi, 60 and the proportion of each covered by understorey (Spearman Rank Correlation, smallness of territory with proportion covered in understorey, r: 1.000, P: 0.01). Letters refer to female of each pair. Figure 18. Percentage occurrences, by months (September 1978- 64 August 1981), of Buff-rumped Thornbills by size of party (total n: 4674 individuals, Monthly Range 30-232). Page Figure 19. Territories of clans of Buff-rumped Thornbills at 66 Wollomombi 1978-181. Area to North cleared grazing land, to South gorge country, unoccupied by species. Figure 20. Clan and group territories of Buff-rumped Thornbill 67 at Wollomombi, 1978/79, 1979/80, 1980/81 (September- August) and 1981/82 (September-February). Letters refer to banded birds (paragraph 75) top bird is female. Figure 21. History of individual Buff-rumped Thornbills of Clan A, 68 at Wollomombi 1978/82. Broken edge at left of bar indicates age unknown at banding, at right indicates known to be alive after leaving.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sericornis, Acanthizidae)
    GENETIC AND MORPHOLOGICAL DIFFERENTIATION AND PHYLOGENY IN THE AUSTRALO-PAPUAN SCRUBWRENS (SERICORNIS, ACANTHIZIDAE) LESLIE CHRISTIDIS,1'2 RICHARD $CHODDE,l AND PETER R. BAVERSTOCK 3 •Divisionof Wildlifeand Ecology, CSIRO, P.O. Box84, Lyneham,Australian Capital Territory 2605, Australia, 2Departmentof EvolutionaryBiology, Research School of BiologicalSciences, AustralianNational University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia, and 3EvolutionaryBiology Unit, SouthAustralian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia ASS•CRACr.--Theinterrelationships of 13 of the 14 speciescurrently recognized in the Australo-Papuan oscinine scrubwrens, Sericornis,were assessedby protein electrophoresis, screening44 presumptivelo.ci. Consensus among analysesindicated that Sericorniscomprises two primary lineagesof hithertounassociated species: S. beccarii with S.magnirostris, S.nouhuysi and the S. perspicillatusgroup; and S. papuensisand S. keriwith S. spiloderaand the S. frontalis group. Both lineages are shared by Australia and New Guinea. Patternsof latitudinal and altitudinal allopatry and sequencesof introgressiveintergradation are concordantwith these groupings,but many featuresof external morphologyare not. Apparent homologiesin face, wing and tail markings, used formerly as the principal criteria for grouping species,are particularly at variance and are interpreted either as coinherited ancestraltraits or homo- plasies. Distribution patternssuggest that both primary lineageswere first split vicariantly between
    [Show full text]
  • Survival of Brown and Striated Thornbills in the Brindabella Range, Australian Capital Territory S
    138 S. V. Briggs and S. A. Thornton: Management of River Red Gums for waterbird nesting Corella 19(4) REFERENCES Lowe, K. W. (1989). Notes on the breeding of the Pacific Heron Ardea pacifirn near Balranald, New South Wales. Beck. L. ( 1991). Lowbidgee management plan stage two: land Corella 13: 88-89. and water management 1991-1996. Department of Water Maher, P. (1988). Historical records on colonial nesting water­ Resources. Leellln. birds in Moira Lake and Gulpa Creek wetland complexes. Briggs. S. V .. Thornton. S. A. and Hodgson, P. F. (1993). Report to New South Wales Department of Water Characteristics of River Red Gums used by nesting water­ Resources, Sydney. birds. A11s1. Birds 27: 12-20. Maher, P. (1990). Bird survey of the Lachlan/ Murrumbidgee Briggs. S. V. Thornton. S. A. and Lawler, W. G. (1994). confluence wetlands. Report to National Parks and Wildlife Management of Red Gum wetlands for waterbirds. Report Service, Sydney. to Natural Resources Management Strategy. National Parks Maher, P. (1993). Breeding success of' ..:olonial waterbirds in and Wildlife Service. Sydney. Moira Lake and Gulpa Creek wetlands. Proc. S. Riverin.a Chesterfield. E. A.. Loyn. R. H. and Macfarlane, M. A. Field Naturalisls Club 1: 47-57. ( 198-+). Flora and fauna of Barmah forest and their manage­ Marchant, S. and Higgins, P. J. (1990). 'Handbook of Austra­ ment. Forest Commission Victoria Research Branch Report lian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds, Vol. I b. (Oxford No. 2-+0. University Press: Melbourne.) Forestry Commission of New South Wales (1985). Manage­ Magrath, M. J. L. (1992). Waterbird study of the lower ment plan for Murray management area.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Biology and Behaviour of the Scarlet
    Corella, 2006, 30(3/4):5945 BREEDINGBIOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUROF THE SCARLETROBIN Petroicamulticolor AND EASTERNYELLOW ROBIN Eopsaltriaaustralis IN REMNANTWOODLAND NEAR ARMIDALE, NEW SOUTH WALES S.J. S.DEBUS Division of Zoology, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351 E-mail: [email protected] Received:I3 January 2006 The breeding biology and behaviour of the Scarlet Robin Petroica multicolor and Eastern Yellow Robin Eopsaltria australis were studied at lmbota Nature Reserve, on the New England Tableland of New South Wales,in 200G-2002by colour-bandingand nest-monitoring.Yellow Robins nested low in shelteredpositions, in plants with small stem diameters(mostly saplings,live trees and shrubs),whereas Scarlet Robins nested high in exposed positions, in plants with large stem diameters (mostly live trees, dead branches or dead trees).Yellow Robin clutch size was two or three eggs (mean 2.2; n = 19). Incubationand nestling periods were 15-17 days and 11-12 days respectively(n = 6) for the Yellow Robin, and 16-18 days (n = 3) and 16 days (n = 1) respectivelyfor the ScarletRobin. Both specieswere multi-brooded,although only YellowRobins successfully raised a second brood. The post-fledging dependence period lasted eight weeks for Yellow Robins, and six weeks for Scarlet Robins. The two robins appear to differ in their susceptibilityto nest predation, with corresponding differences in anti-predator strategies. INTRODUCTION provides empirical data on aspects that may vary geographicallywith seasonalconditions, or with habitator The
    [Show full text]
  • Social Behaviour and Breeding Biology of the Yeliow-Rumped Thornbill
    Social Behaviour and Breeding Biology of the Yeliow-Rumped Thornbill Daniel Ebert A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of hilosophy of The Australian National University April 2004 Declaration The research presented in this thesis is my own original work and no part has been submitted for a previous degree. Signed Daniel Ebert April 2004 Dedication In memory of Anjeli Catherine Nathan 18 March 1975 - 3 November 1999 Acknowledgements This thesis was a work in progress, or not, for some years and many people made significant contributions of supervision, assistance or support. My supervisor, Rob Magrath, and Andrew Cockburn and David Green were instrumental in promoting thombill research as a worthwhile pursuit. I thank them for their contributions to the formulation of this project and their interest in my work. Rob Magrath’s particular combination of insight, knowledge and patience was invaluable throughout this study. I am also grateful for the general advice and guidance of Rob Heinsohn and Sarah Legge. This project involved many early morning mist-netting sessions which would have been even more “miss” than “hit” without the enthusiastic assistance of numerous volunteers. David Green, Mike Double, James Nicholls, Sarah Legge, Anjeli Nathan, Janet Gardner, Nie MacGregor, Rob Heinsohn, Rob Magrath, Andrew Cockburn and Peter Marsack all cheerfully participated in the usually unrewarding exercise of netting thombills in the mist and cold. I’m especially grateful to Steve Murphy for his competence and enthusiasm in the field and his impressive ability to find thombill nests after half an hour of “training”. Minisatellite DNA fingerprinting is an error-prone and frustrating procedure usually requiring good fortune as well as good management for success.
    [Show full text]
  • Diverse Interactions, Including Hybridisation, Between Brown and Inland Thornbills in South Australia
    18 South Australian Ornithologist 41 (1) Diverse interactions, including hybridisation, between Brown and Inland Thornbills in South Australia ANDREW BLACK, PHILIPPA HORTON AND LEO JOSEPH Abstract relative) the Mountain Thornbill, A. katherina, of the Wet Tropics rainforests; the Inland Thornbill, A. apicalis, widespread across southern and Brown and Inland Thornbills have three zones of central Australian semi-arid and arid zones and contact in South Australia. Two of these involve the more mesic south-west of Western Australia; the Mount Lofty Ranges Brown Thornbill, which and the Tasmanian Thornbill, A. ewingi, endemic hybridises extensively with the Inland Thornbill in to Tasmania and its larger offshore islands. coastal shrublands and mangroves of eastern Gulf St Vincent, and which forms an apparently narrow Though the Brown and Inland Thornbills are not hybrid zone near Meningie with Inland Thornbills of sister species, the nature of interactions between the Upper South-East of South Australia. The third them where they approach each other in several zone involves Brown Thornbills of the South-East parts of their ranges has long been a contentious of South Australia and the Inland Thornbill, again area of research (e.g. Mayr and Serventy 1938, its Upper South-East population. This is evidently a Boles 1983, Schodde and Mason 1999). This paper broad zone of overlap without interbreeding. Closer further addresses the issue. study of the Gulf St Vincent hybrid zone revealed a variety of hybrid phenotypes but no parental forms. Across their full geographic ranges three major Most of the hybrid phenotypes resemble Inland zones of interaction between Brown and Inland Thornbills while some resemble Brown Thornbills of Thornbills have been recognised: 1) the Upper the Mount Lofty Ranges or of the South-East of South South-East of South Australia (SA) and north- Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Australia: October-November 2016
    Tropical Birding Trip Report Eastern Australia: October-November 2016 A Tropical Birding SET DEPARTURE tour EASTERN AUSTRALIA: From Top to Bottom 23rd October – 11th November 2016 The bird of the trip, the very impressive POWERFUL OWL Tour Leader: Laurie Ross All photos in this report were taken by Laurie Ross/Tropical Birding. 1 www.tropicalbirding.com +1-409-515-9110 [email protected] Page Tropical Birding Trip Report Eastern Australia: October-November 2016 INTRODUCTION The Eastern Australia Set Departure Tour introduces a huge amount of new birds and families to the majority of the group. We started the tour in Cairns in Far North Queensland, where we found ourselves surrounded by multiple habitats from the tidal mudflats of the Cairns Esplanade, the Great Barrier Reef and its sandy cays, lush lowland and highland rainforests of the Atherton Tablelands, and we even made it to the edge of the Outback near Mount Carbine; the next leg of the tour took us south to Southeast Queensland where we spent time in temperate rainforests and wet sclerophyll forests within Lamington National Park. The third, and my favorite leg, of the tour took us down to New South Wales, where we birded a huge variety of new habitats from coastal heathland to rocky shorelines and temperate rainforests in Royal National Park, to the mallee and brigalow of Inland New South Wales. The fourth and final leg of the tour saw us on the beautiful island state of Tasmania, where we found all 13 “Tassie” endemics. We had a huge list of highlights, from finding a roosting Lesser Sooty Owl in Malanda; to finding two roosting Powerful Owls near Brisbane; to having an Albert’s Lyrebird walk out in front of us at O Reilly’s; to seeing the rare and endangered Regent Honeyeaters in the Capertee Valley, and finding the endangered Swift Parrot on Bruny Island, in Tasmania.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of Waite Conservation Reserve
    BIRDS OF WAITE CONSERVATION RESERVE Taxonomic order & nomenclature follow Menkhorst P, Rogers D, Clarke R, Davies J, Marsack P, & Franklin K. 2017. The Australian Bird Guide. CSIRO Publishing. Anatidae Australian Wood Duck Chenonetta jubata R Pacific Black Duck Anas superciliosa R Phasianidae Stubble Quail Coturnix pectoralis R Brown Quail Coturnix ypsilophora V Ardeidae White-faced Heron Egretta novaehollandiae V Pelecanidae Australian Pelican Pelecanus conspicillatus V Accipitridae Black-shouldered Kite Elanus axillaris R Square-tailed Kite Lophoictinia isura R Little Eagle Hieraaetus morphnoides V Wedge-tailed Eagle Aquila audax R Brown Goshawk Accipiter fasciatus U Collared Sparrowhawk Accipiter cirrocephalus R Spotted Harrier Circus assimilis V Whistling Kite Haliastur sphenurus V Turnicidae Little Button-quail Turnix velox V Columbidae Feral Pigeon (Rock Dove) *Columba livia C Spotted Dove *Spilopelia chinensis R Common Bronzewing Phaps chalcoptera U Crested Pigeon +Ocyphaps lophotes C Cuculidae Horsfield’s Bronze Cuckoo Chalcites basalis R Fan-tailed Cuckoo Cacomantis flabelliformis R Tytonidae Eastern Barn Owl Tyto delicatula V Strigidae Southern Boobook Ninox boobook C Podargidae Tawny Frogmouth Podargus strigoides C Alcedinidae Laughing Kookaburra Dacelo novaeguineae C Falconidae Nankeen Kestrel Falco cenchroides R Australian Hobby Falco longipennis R Brown Falcon Falco berigora V Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus U Cacatuidae Yellow-tailed Black-Cockatoo Calyptorhynchus funereus C Galah Eolophus roseicapilla C Long-billed Corella
    [Show full text]
  • Years 11 and 12
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 263 010 SE 046 226 AUTHOR Brown, David W., Ed.; Sewell, Jeffrey J., Ed. TITLE Australian Biology Test Item Bank, Years 11 and 12. Volume I: Year 11. INSTITUTION Australian Council for Educational Research, Hawthorn. REPORT NO ISBN-0-85563-377-8 PUB DATE 85 NOTE 237p.; For volume II, see SE 046 227. AVAILABLE FROMBiology Test Item Bank Project, The Australian Council for Educational Research, 9 Frederick Street, Hawthorn, Victoria 3122, Australia. PUB TYPE Tests/Evaluation Instruments (160) EDRS PRICE MF01 Plus Postage. PC Not Available from EDRS. DESCRIPTORS *Biology; *Ecology; Grade 11; Grade 12; High Schools; Nutrition; Reproduction (Biology); Science Education; *Science Tests; *Secoldary School Science; *Test Items IDENTIFIERS *Australia ABSTRACT This document consists of test items which are applicable to biology courses throughout Australia (irrespective of course materials used); assess key concepts within course statement (for both core and optional studies); assess a wide range of cognitive processes; and are relevant to current biological concepts. These items are arranged under eight headings: (1) investigating the living world; (2) the variety of life; (3) organisms and environments; (4) reproduction; (5) nutrition, development and growth; (6) populations; (7) interaction and change in the natural world; and (8) the living world. Also included are brief comments on and applications of the test items. (ML) *********************************************************************** * Reproductions supplied by EDRS
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptive Radiation and the Evolution of Nectarivory in a Large Songbird Clade
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/evo.13734 Adaptive radiation and the evolution of nectarivory in a large songbird clade Petter Z. Marki,1,2,3 Jonathan D. Kennedy,1,4 Christopher R. Cooney,4 Carsten Rahbek,1,5,6 and Jon Fjeldsa˚ 1,7 1Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen DK-2100, Denmark 2Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, Oslo 0318, Norway 3E-mail: [email protected] 4Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom 5Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Ascot SL5 7PY, United Kingdom 6E-mail: [email protected] 7E-mail: [email protected] Received April 9, 2018 Accepted March 22, 2019 The accumulation of exceptional ecological diversity within a lineage is a key feature of adaptive radiation resulting from diversi- fication associated with the subdivision of previously underutilized resources. The invasion of unoccupied niche space is predicted to be a key determinant of adaptive diversification, and this process may be particularly important if the diversity of competing lineages within the area, in which the radiation unfolds, is already high. Here, we test whether the evolution of nectarivory resulted in significantly higher rates of morphological evolution, more extensive morphological disparity, and a heightened build- up of sympatric species diversity in a large adaptive radiation of passerine birds (the honeyeaters, about 190 species) that have diversified extensively throughout continental and insular settings. We find that a large increase in rates of body size evolution and general expansion in morphological space followed an ancestral shift to nectarivory, enabling the build-up of large numbers of co-occurring species that vary greatly in size, compared to related and co-distributed nonnectarivorous clades.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1. Locality Map Appendix 2
    Appendix 1. Locality map Appendix 2. Species of conservation significance recorded within the site. Table 1. Threatened Flora species Common Name Scientific Name National NSW Victoria Threatened Threatened Threatened Species Species Species Boree Acacia pendula e Common Joyweed Alternanthera nodiflora k Swamp Wallaby Amphibromus fluitans vvk Grass Emu-foot Cullen tenax e Western Boobialla Myoporum montanum r Austral Pillwort Pilularia novae-hollandiae e Sandalwood Santalum lanceolatum e Lilac Darling Pea Swainsona phacoides e Key: e, endangered; v, vulnerable; r, rare; k, poorly known in Victoria 1 Other noteworthy flora may occur in the NSW Murray Central State Forests but their presence has not been positively determined. Potentially occurring threatened species include Brachycome muelleroides, Callitriche cyclocarpa, Cullen parvum, Lepidium monoplocoides, Rhodanthe stricta and Sclerolaena napiformis; National Threatened Species: listed under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999; NSW Threatened Species: listed under the NSW Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995; Victorian Threatened Species: listed under the Victorian Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988. Table 2. Threatened Fauna Species Common Name Scientific NameIUCN Threatened Species Act JAMBA/ Red Nationa NSW Victoria CAMBA List l BIRDS Australasian Shoveler4 (a) Anas rhynchotis v Forked-tailed Swift5 Apus pacificus J,C Great Egret3 (a) Ardea alba eJ,C Little Egret3 (a) Egretta garzetta ce Cattle Egret4 (a) Ardea ibis J,C Intermediate Egret3 (a) Ardea
    [Show full text]
  • A Glovebox Guide Greening Australia
    n A GLOVEBOX GUIDE GREENING AUSTRALIA n A GLOVEBOX GUIDE GREENING AUSTRALIA bringing birds back acknowledgements A glovebox GUIDE FOR BIRD IDENTIFICation Greening Australia Would like & Habitat restoration IN THE ACT & SE NSW to THank: PROJECT TEAM: Sue Streatfield, Nicki Taws & • All landholders for their commitment to habitat Haydn Burgess restoration, and for making their properties available for bird surveys AUTHOR: Nicki Taws • Sue Streatfield for conceiving and developing ContributORS: Suzi Bond & Toby Jones the Birdwatch project INFormation SOURCES: • Nicki Taws for making the project happen, drawing Pizzey, G. and Knight, F. 2003. The Field Guide the data together and writing the Bringing Birds to Birds of Australia 7th ed. Back publication Schodde, R. and Tidemann, S.C. (eds.) 1986. • C anberra Ornithologists Group and associated Reader’s Digest Complete Book of Australian Birds. volunteers, including Barbara Allan, Tony Daukus, PHotos: Dianne Deans, Mike Doyle, Ken Freeman, Roger Helen Fallow: Yellow-rumped Thornbill, Crimson Freney, Malcolm Fyfe, Julie McGuiness, Martyn Rosella, Australian Magpie, Willie Wagtail, White- Moffat, John Reynolds, Graham and Helen plumed Honeyeater, European Goldfinch, White-browed Stephinson, Nicki Taws and Richard Webb for Scrubwren, Australian Raven, Blackbird, Scarlet Robin, contributing their highly skilled birdwatching efforts Speckled Warbler, Diamond Firetail, Hooded Robin, • Special thanks to Malcolm Fyfe and Barbara Allan Southern Whiteface, White-throated Treecreeper, for their unwavering
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology of the Ecological Community
    APPENDIX A: BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY OF THE ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY This appendix provides further relevant information about the biology and ecology of the KI Narrow-leaved Mallee Woodland ecological community to better understand what the ecological community is and how it functions. Biology of key species The dominant presence of Eucalyptus cneorifolia in the tree canopy is a diagnostic feature of the ecological community. The KI narrow-leaved mallee is an upright tree, to ten metres tall, sometimes with a single stem or in the form of a multi-stemmed mallee (Brooker et al., 2002). It generally forms a dense canopy of narrow, dark green leaves. The leaves have conspicuous oil glands and the species was used for the Eucalyptus oil industry (Willoughby et al., 2001). The KI narrow-leaved mallee develops a lignotuber at the base of the trunk. Regeneration after disturbances, such as fire, occurs mostly through resprouts from the lignotuber. Regeneration from canopy-stored seed or from the soil seed bank is thought to be limited (Rawson et al., 2012). Other plant species may be widespread throughout the ecological community, for instance Melaleuca uncinata (broombrush), M. lanceolata (dryland tea-tree) or Thryptomene ericaea (heath thryptomene) are common at many sites. However, no other plant species occurs across all sites nor has such an obvious presence that it governs the structure and appearance of the ecological community. Similar considerations apply to the faunal component of the ecological community. The upper height limit for mallee eucalypts is typically about 9 metres (Parsons, 1994). An unusual feature of mallees on KI is that they can be taller, sometimes exceptionally so.
    [Show full text]