DOCSLIB.ORG

Departamento De Loreto

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Departamento De Loreto 9. Departamento de Loreto Perú: Análisis Etnosociodemográfico de las Comunidades Nativas de la Amazonía, 1993 y 2007 159 160 Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática LORETO: UBICACIÓN GEOGRÁFICA Y DISTRIBUCIÓN ESPACIAL DE LA POBLACIÓN POR ETNIA, SEGÚN CENTROS POBLADOS, 2007 MAYNAS LORETO MARISCAL RAMÓN CASTILLA DATEM DEL MARAÑÓN ALTO AMAZONAS REQUENA SIGNOS CONVENCIONALES Río Carretera asfaltada Carretera afirmada Carretera sin afirmar Trocha carrozable UCAYALI UBICACIÓN EN EL PAÍS Población en las comunidades COLOMBIA nativas amazónicas ECUADOR Etnia 3 420 TUMBES LORETO Achual, Aguaruna (Aguajun), Arabela, Asháninka. PIURA AMAZONAS LAMBAYEQUE Bora, Candoshi - Murato (Shapra), Capanahua, CAJAMARCA SAN 1682 MARTÍN BRASIL Chamicuro - Cocama Cocamilla. LA LIBERTAD Chayahuita, Cocama Cocamilla, Huambisa, Huitoto - Meneca, ÁNCASH 759 HUÁNUCO UCAYALI Huitoto - Murui, Huitoto Muiname, Iquito, Jebero, Jebero - Chayahuita, Jíbaro - Achual. PASCO 561 JUNÍN LIMA Matses, Ocaina, Orejón, Piro, Quichua. MADRE DE DIOS 272 CUSCO HUANCAVELICA Resígaro - Ocaina, Secoya, Shipibo - Conibo, Ticuna, OCÉANO PACÍFICO APURÍMAC AYACUCHO 96 ICA Urarina, Yagua. PUNO 5 AREQUIPA SIGNOS CONVENCIONALES MOQUEGUA Capital de Departamento BOLIVIA Límite Departamental TACNA CHILE Fuente: INEI - II Censo de Comunidades Indígenas de la Amazonía Peruana, 2007. Límites Políticos Administrativos con fines Censales Perú: Análisis Etnosociodemográfico de las Comunidades Nativas de la Amazonía, 1993 y 2007 161 162 Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática 9. Departamento de Loreto: Análisis Sociodemográfico de las Comunidades Nativas de la Amazonía (CNA) 9.1 UBICACIÓN GEOGRÁFICA encuentran distribuidos en 41 distritos que a su vez comprenden a 29 etnias que se muestran en el siguiente El departamento de Loreto comprende a un total de listado: 105 mil 900 nativos amazónicos, los cuales se DISTRITOS Y ETNIAS POB. DISTRITOS Y ETNIAS POB. DISTRITOS Y ETNIAS POB. Distrito Alto Nanay 569 Etnia Chayahuita 705 Distrito San Pablo 825 Etnia Asháninka 50 Etnia Jebero - Chayahuita 226 Etnia Ticuna 198 Etnia Iquito 519 Etnia Jebero 126 Etnia Yagua 627 Distrito Indiana 1 214 Distrito Lagunas 2 999 Distrito Alto Tapiche 244 Etnia Yagua 1 214 Etnia Candoshi - Murato (Shapra) 1 051 Etnia Capanahua 244 Distrito Las Amazonas 1 437 Etnia Cocama -Cocamilla 1 780 Distrito Emilio San Martín 140 Etnia Yagua 1 437 Etnia Chamicuro - Cocama Cocamilla 63 Etnia Capanahua 140 Distrito Mazán 576 Etnia Chayahuita 105 Distrito Maquia 2 432 Etnia Orejón 79 Distrito Santa Cruz 851 Etnia Cocama -Cocamilla 2 432 Etnia Quichua 179 Etnia Cocama -Cocamilla 499 Distrito Yaquerana 1 724 Etnia Yagua 318 Etnia Chayahuita 352 Etnia Matses 1 724 Distrito Napo 7 691 Distrito Teniente César Lopez Rojas 1 247 Distrito Contamana 3 700 Etnia Arabela 403 Etnia Aguaruna (Aguajun) 10 Etnia Shipibo - Conibo 3 700 Etnia Huitoto - Murui 438 Etnia Chayahuita 1 237 Distrito Inahuaya 126 Etnia Orejón 79 Distrito Nauta 241 Etnia Shipibo - Conibo 126 Etnia Quichua 6 771 Etnia Cocama -Cocamilla 241 Distrito Padre Márquez 2 924 Distrito Punchana 1 316 Distrito Parinari 3 276 Etnia Shipibo - Conibo 2 924 Etnia Cocama -Cocamilla 1 316 Etnia Cocama -Cocamilla 3 276 Distrito Pampa Hermosa 242 Distrito Putumayo 2 671 Distrito Tigre 3 511 Etnia Piro 177 Etnia Cocama -Cocamilla 130 Etnia Achual 390 Etnia Shipibo - Conibo 65 Etnia Huitoto - Meneca 176 Etnia Cocama -Cocamilla 196 Distrito Sarayacu 56 Etnia Huitoto - Murui 549 Etnia Quichua 2 925 Etnia Shipibo - Conibo 56 Etnia Ocaina 29 Distrito Trompeteros 7 234 Distrito Vargas Guerra 309 Etnia Orejón 32 Etnia Achual 6 505 Etnia Shipibo - Conibo 309 Etnia Quichua 1 184 Etnia Jíbaro - Achual 168 Distrito Barranca 753 Etnia Ticuna 68 Etnia Quichua 259 Etnia Aguaruna (Aguajun) 753 Etnia Yagua 503 Etnia Urarina 302 Distrito Cahuapanas 5 877 Distrito Torres Causana 4 301 Distrito Urarinas 5 497 Etnia Aguaruna (Aguajun) 1 268 Etnia Quichua 4 009 Etnia Cocama -Cocamilla 945 Etnia Chayahuita 4 609 Etnia Secoya 292 Etnia Urarina 4 552 Distrito Manseriche 4 362 Distrito Belén 114 Distrito Ramón Castilla 6 234 Etnia Aguaruna (Aguajun) 4 362 Etnia Cocama -Cocamilla 114 Etnia Ticuna 5 397 Distrito Morona 3 690 Distrito Teniente Manuel Clavero 2 619 Etnia Yagua 837 Etnia Achual 807 Etnia Huitoto - Meneca 121 Distrito Pebas 2 068 Etnia Aguaruna (Aguajun) 95 Etnia Huitoto - Murui 108 Etnia Bora 748 Etnia Candoshi - Murato (Shapra) 882 Etnia Quichua 1 761 Etnia Huitoto - Murui 417 Etnia Huambisa 1 906 Etnia Secoya 629 Etnia Huitoto Muiname 55 Distrito Pastaza 646 Distrito Yurimaguas 685 Etnia Ocaina 68 Etnia Candoshi - Murato (Shapra) 646 Etnia Chayahuita 685 Etnia Resígaro - Ocaina 37 Distrito Andoas 5 923 Distrito Balsapuerto 13 200 Etnia Yagua 743 Etnia Achual 3 217 Etnia Chayahuita 13 200 Distrito Yavarí 1 319 Etnia Candoshi - Murato (Shapra) 676 Distrito Jeberos 1 057 Etnia Ticuna 1 319 Etnia Quichua 2 030 Perú: Análisis Etnosociodemográfico de las Comunidades Nativas de la Amazonía, 1993 y 2007 163 9.2 VOLUMEN POBLACIONAL Y TASA DE CRECIMIENTO El Censo 2007 registra para el departamento de departamento de Loreto, pues de una población de Loreto una población total de 687 mil 282 habitantes, 687 mil 282 habitantes, pasó a 891 mil 732 de los cuales 456 mil 962 son hombres y 434 mil 770 habitantes, marcando un ritmo de crecimiento anual son mujeres. Dentro de esta población se ubica una de 1,84 por cada 100 habitantes. Por otro lado, la población nativa amazónica de 105 mil 900 habitantes, población nativa amazónica tuvo un cambio es decir, 11,9% de la población total del departamento poblacional bastante importante, pues pasó de de Loreto. 61 mil 793 habitantes a 105 mil 900 habitantes observando un ritmo de crecimiento anual de 3,84 El cambio poblacional experimentado en el periodo por cada 100 habitantes. intercensal 1993-2007 fue considerable a nivel del GRÁFICO N° 9.1 DEPARTAMENTO DE LORETO: POBLACIÓN CENSADA, 1993 Y 2007 1 000 000 r=1,84 891 732 900 000 800 000 687 282 700 000 600 000 500 000 400 000 300 000 200 000 100 000 0 0 1993 2007 Fuente: INEI – Censos Nacionales de Población y Vivienda 1993 y 2007. GRÁFICO N° 9.2 DEPARTAMENTO DE LORETO: POBLACIÓN EN LAS COMUNIDADES NATIVAS AMAZÓNICAS, 1993 Y 2007 120 000 105 900 r=3,84 100 000 80 000 61 793 60 000 40 000 20 000 0 1993 2007 Fuente: INEI – Censo de Comunidades Indígenas de la Amazonía Peruana, 1993 y 2007. Censos Nacionales de Población y Vivienda 1993 y 2007. 9.3 ESTRUCTURA DE LA POBLACIÓN POR EDAD Y SEXO En el Cuadro Nº 9.1, se muestra la distribución por de los años 1993 y 2007, como referentes se añade la sexo y edades quinquenales de la población de las distribución de la población por edad y sexo del comunidades nativas amazónicas (CNA) que habitan departamento de Loreto, para los mismos referentes el departamento de Loreto, según los reportes censales censales. 164 Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática Las correspondientes representaciones gráficas se hacen de un "rejuvenecimiento por la base". Pero la pirámide en pirámides poblacionales relativas tanto para la correspondiente al año 2007 en las comunidades población de las comunidades nativas amazónicas nativas amazónicas que habitan el departamento de como para la población del departamento de Loreto. Loreto evidencia una pirámide del tipo expansiva, netamente joven, evidenciando un alto nivel de Puede apreciarse a nivel del departamento, para el fecundidad, así mismo, el deterioro de la pirámide 2007, que todavía se percibe una población joven en los quinquenios de 15 a 19 y de 20 a 24, advierte con base ancha, y los primeros quinquenios de la que hay desplazamientos de jóvenes abandonando vida muestran un cambio en la tendencia de la sus comunidades, ligeramente más marcado en el población ocasionado por un rebrote de la género masculino. fecundidad, esto es lo que viene a llamarse el inicio CUADRO Nº 9.1 DEPARTAMENTO DE LORETO: ESTRUCTURA DE LA POBLACION CENSADA Y DE LAS COMUNIDADES NATIVAS AMAZÓNICAS POR SEXO, SEGÚN EDADES QUINQUENALES, 1993 Y 2007 EDADES DEPARTAMENTO DE LORETO, 1993 C.N.A.DEL DEPARTAMENTO DE LORETO 1993 QUINQUENALES Total Hombre Mujer Total Hombre Mujer Total 687 282 353 587 333 695 61 793 31 973 29 820 0 - 4 114 265 57 933 56 332 12 241 6 099 6 142 5 - 9 104 613 52 842 51 771 10 659 5 405 5 254 10 - 14 93 816 47 986 45 830 8 703 4 560 4 143 15 - 19 72 408 37 350 35 058 6 068 2 981 3 087 20 - 24 58 370 29 098 29 272 5 157 2 566 2 591 25 - 29 51 060 25 734 25 326 4 341 2 274 2 067 30 - 34 44 316 23 245 21 071 3 417 1 881 1 536 35 - 39 36 148 19 099 17 049 2 940 1 500 1 440 40 - 44 29 408 16 286 13 122 2 318 1 353 965 45 - 49 22 088 11 825 10 263 2 017 1 076 941 50 - 54 17 394 9 440 7 954 1 290 758 532 55 - 59 13 194 7 040 6 154 874 522 352 60 - 64 11 202 6 034 5 168 772 456 316 65 - 69 7 604 3 987 3 617 419 215 204 70 - 74 5 142 2 658 2 484 300 169 131 75 - 79 3 254 1 669 1 585 129 77 52 80 y más 3 000 1 361 1 639 148 81 67 EDADES DEPARTAMENTO DE LORETO, 2007 C.N.A.DEL DEPARTAMENTO DE LORETO 2007 QUINQUENALES Total Hombre Mujer Total Hombre Mujer Total 891 732 456 962 434 770 105 900 55 853 50 047 0 - 4 128 240 65 187 63 053 19 465 9 822 9 643 5 - 9 105 686 53 699 51 987 16 541 8 269 8 272 10 - 14 110 421 56 612 53 809 14 463 7 611 6 852 15 - 19 100 631 51 003 49 628 11 029 5 556 5 473 20 - 24 80 569 40 194 40 375 8 843 4 530 4 313 25 - 29 68 734 34 617 34 117 7 757 4 235 3 522 30 - 34 57 630 29 428 28 202 6 206 3 559 2 647 35 - 39 51 784 25 998 25 786 5 688 3 025 2 663 40 - 44 45 885 24 109 21 776 4 487 2 632 1 855 45 - 49 38 094 20 364 17 730 3 595 2 092 1 503 50 - 54 29 836 16 190 13 646 2 524 1 449 1 075 55 - 59 22 952 12 534 10 418 1 904 1 149 755 60 - 64 16 914 9 198 7 716 1 409 789 620 65 - 69 12 797 6 843 5 954 855 496 359 70 - 74 8 830 4 671 4 159 502 283 219 75 - 79 6 598 3 415 3 183 341 206 135 80 y más 6 131 2 900 3 231 291 150 141 Fuente: INEI - Censo de Comunidades Indígenas de la Amazonía Peruana, 1993 y 2007 - Censos Nacionales de Población y Vivienda, 1993 y 2007.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Corrientes River Case: Indigenous People's
    THE CORRIENTES RIVER CASE: INDIGENOUS PEOPLE'S MOBILIZATION IN RESPONSE TO OIL DEVELOPMENT IN THE PERUVIAN AMAZON by GRACIELA MARIA MERCEDES LU A THESIS Presented to the Department of International Studies and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment ofthe requirements for the degree of Master of Arts December 2009 ---------------- ii "The Corrientes River Case: Indigenous People's Mobilization in Response to Oil Development in the Peruvian Amazon," a thesis prepared by Graciela Marfa Mercedes Lu in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts degree in the Department of International Studies. This thesis has been approved and accepted by: lT.. hiS man.u...s. c. ript .has been approved by the advisor and committee named~ _be'oV\l __~!1_d _~Y--'3:~c~_ard Linton, Dean of the Graduate Scho~I_.. ~ Date Committee in Charge: Derrick Hindery, Chair Anita M. Weiss Carlos Aguirre Accepted by: III © 2009 Graciela Marfa Mercedes Lu IV An Abstract of the Thesis of Graciela M. Lu for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of International Studies to be taken December 2009 Title: THE CORRIENTES RIVER CASE: INDIGENOUS PEOPLE'S MOBILIZATION IN RESPONSE TO OIL DEVELOPMENT IN THE PERUVIAN AMAZON Approved: Derrick Hindery Economic models applied in Latin America tend to prioritize economic growth heavily based on extractive industries and a power distribution model that affects social equity and respect for human rights. This thesis advances our understanding of the social, political and environmental concerns that influenced the formation of a movement among the Achuar people, in response to oil exploitation activities in the Peruvian Amazon.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the World's Indigenous Peoples
    5th Volume State of the World’s Indigenous Peoples Photo: Fabian Amaru Muenala Fabian Photo: Rights to Lands, Territories and Resources Acknowledgements The preparation of the State of the World’s Indigenous Peoples: Rights to Lands, Territories and Resources has been a collaborative effort. The Indigenous Peoples and Development Branch/ Secretariat of the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues within the Division for Inclusive Social Development of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat oversaw the preparation of the publication. The thematic chapters were written by Mattias Åhrén, Cathal Doyle, Jérémie Gilbert, Naomi Lanoi Leleto, and Prabindra Shakya. Special acknowledge- ment also goes to the editor, Terri Lore, as well as the United Nations Graphic Design Unit of the Department of Global Communications. ST/ESA/375 Department of Economic and Social Affairs Division for Inclusive Social Development Indigenous Peoples and Development Branch/ Secretariat of the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues 5TH Volume Rights to Lands, Territories and Resources United Nations New York, 2021 Department of Economic and Social Affairs The Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat is a vital interface between global policies in the economic, social and environmental spheres and national action. The Department works in three main interlinked areas: (i) it compiles, generates and analyses a wide range of economic, social and environ- mental data and information on which States Members of the United Nations draw to review common problems and to take stock of policy options; (ii) it facilitates the negotiations of Member States in many intergovernmental bodies on joint courses of action to address ongoing or emerging global challenges; and (iii) it advises interested Governments on ways and means of translating policy frameworks developed in United Nations conferences and summits into programmes at the country level and, through technical assistance, helps build national capacities.
    [Show full text]
  • Years in the Abanico Del Pastaza - Why We Are Here Stop Theto Degradation of the Planet’S Natural Environment and to Build a Nature
    LESSONS LEARNED years10 in + the Abanico del Pastaza Nature, cultures and challenges in the Northern Peruvian Amazon In the Abanico del Pastaza, the largest wetland complex in the Peruvian Amazon, some of the most successful and encouraging conservation stories were written. But, at the same time, these were also some of the toughest and most complex in terms of efforts and sacrifices by its people, in order to restore and safeguard the vital link between the health of the surrounding nature and their own. This short review of stories and lessons, which aims to share the example of the Achuar, Quechua, Kandozi and their kindred peoples with the rest of the world, is dedicated to them. When, in the late nineties, the PREFACE WWF team ventured into the © DIEGO PÉREZ / WWF vast complex of wetlands surrounding the Pastaza river, they did not realize that what they thought to be a “traditional” two-year project would become one of their longest interventions, including major challenges and innovations, both in Peru and in the Amazon basin. The small team, mainly made up of biologists and field technicians, aspired to technically support the creation of a natural protected area to guarantee the conservation of the high local natural diversity, which is also the basis to one of the highest rates of fishing productivity in the Amazon. Soon it became clear that this would not be a routine experience but, on the contrary, it would mark a sort of revolution in the way WWF Patricia León Melgar had addressed conservation in the Amazon until then.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2015 Annual Report Download
    Literacy & Evangelism INTERNATIONAL “...in his word I put my hope.” PSALM 130:5 NIV THE MISSION Literacy & Evangelism International (LEI) equips the Church to share the message of Jesus Christ through the gift of reading. THE STRATEGY We develop Bible-content materials to teach basic reading in local languages and conversational English. We train church leaders and missionaries to use LEI materials for evangelism, discipleship and church planting. We develop partnerships that expand the mission of LEI. “...in his word I put my hope.” PSALM 130:5 NIV 2015 Annual Report 1 MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT: Sid Rice Dear LEI Shareholders: “I wait for the LORD, my whole being waits, and in His word I put my hope.” (Psalm 130:5 NIV) I resonate with the words of the psalmist and, like you, have the privilege of daily reading the words in which we place our hope. However, a billion non-readers around the globe are not able to read for themselves the hope found in the scriptures. Literacy and Evangelism International (LEI) missionaries and global partners continue to open the eyes of non-readers that they too may read of the hope found in God’s word. I am encouraged by Christopher, an eleven- year-old from the Democratic Republic of Congo, who shared, before he could read and write he was “feeling as if I didn’t even exist.” Now, after learning to read using an LEI basic reader, he shares, “God has opened my memory.” Learning to read has given Christopher a new hope. Christopher is not alone; he is one of over twenty thousand new Bible readers created in 2014 through the ministry of LEI.
    [Show full text]
  • A Legacy of Harm
    A LEGACY OF HARM Occidental Petroleum in Indigenous Territory in the Peruvian Amazon EarthRights International Racimos de Ungurahui Amazon Watch EarthRights International • Racimos de Ungurahui • Amazon Watch A LEGACY OF HARM Occidental Petroleum in Indigenous Territory in the Peruvian Amazon “[Oxy] said there wasn’t anything wrong, that the river and the animals and fish were fine. Oxy . didn’t warn us about anything, and this was when Oxy was contaminating our area. Oxy said, ‘we’re just extracting petroleum, we’re not contaminating.’ And so we got no support from Oxy . How am I going to survive? Where am I going to hunt? I want help. How am I going to raise my children?” — Man from Antioquía, May 2006 ABOUT the AUthorS EarthRights International (ERI) is a nonprofit, nongovernmental organization that combines the power of law and the power of people in defense of human rights and the environment. We focus our work at the intersection of human rights and the environment, which we define as earth rights. We specialize in fact-finding, legal actions against perpetrators of earth rights abuses, training for grassroots and community leaders, and advocacy campaigns. Through these strategies, ERI seeks to end earth rights abuses and promote and protect earth rights. ERI has offices in Thailand and Washington, DC. Racimos de Ungurahui is a nonprofit, nongovernmental organization based in Lima, Peru that was founded in 1995 with the mission to contribute to the strengthening and development of the human rights of indigenous Amazonian peoples. Racimos works with the social movement representing the indigenous Amazonian peoples of Peru to strengthen the internal capacity and external capacity of these communities within the context of their multiethnic and multicultural society.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    IPPI 6 May 2002 STRATEGY TO INCLUDE INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES IN THE RURAL EDUCATION PROJECT PERU: Rural Education and Teacher Development Project Public Disclosure Authorized I. BACKGROUND 1. LEGAL FRAMEWORK The Peruvian legal framework includes the right of indigenous peoples to education in various legal instances. Peruvian norms in this respect are included in the political constitution of the nation, the General Education Act, the Primary Education Regulations and the recent regulations creating in the National Inter-cultural Bilingual Education Directorate and its Consultative Council. Article 2, ofPeru's Political Constitution mentions that all individuals have the right to preserve their ethnic and cultural identity; that the Peruvian state recognizes and protects ethnic and cultural plurality in the nation; that bilingual and inter-cultural education must be fostered, recognizing each area's characteristics while preserving the various cultural and language manifestations. Public Disclosure Authorized Peru has signedILO'S 169 Agreement(ratified in 1993) recognizing the right of indigenous boys and girls to learn to read and write in their own language, and preserve and develop it. It also recognizes the right of indigenous peoples to be asked about state measures aimed at accomplishing these goals. Likewise, Peru has signed theUniversal Declaration of Human Right4 article 26 of which establishes that educatioii will have as its objective to achieve full individual development, and to strengthen respect for human rights and fundamental
    [Show full text]
  • Uses, Cultural Significance, and Management of Peatlands in The
    1 Uses, cultural significance, and management of peatlands in the Peruvian Amazon: 2 implications for conservation 3 Christopher Schulz a, Manuel Martín Brañas b, Cecilia Núñez Pérez b, Margarita Del Águila 4 Villacorta b, Nina Laurie c, Ian T. Lawson c, Katherine H. Roucoux c 5 a Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Downing Place, Cambridge CB2 3EN, 6 United Kingdom 7 b Amazonian Cultural Diversity and Economy Research Programme, Peruvian Amazon Research 8 Institute (IIAP), Av. José A. Quiñones km 2.5, Iquitos, Peru 9 c School of Geography and Sustainable Development, University of St Andrews, Irvine Building, 10 North Street, St Andrews KY16 9AL, United Kingdom 11 12 Corresponding author: 13 Christopher Schulz ([email protected]) 14 Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Downing Place, Cambridge CB2 3EN, 15 United Kingdom 16 17 E-mail addresses co-authors: 18 Manuel Martín Brañas: [email protected] 19 Cecilia Núñez Pérez: [email protected] 20 Margarita Del Águila Villacorta: [email protected] 21 Nina Laurie: [email protected] 22 Ian T. Lawson: [email protected] 23 Katherine H. Roucoux: [email protected] 24 25 Acknowledgements 26 The authors would like to thank the communities of Nueva York and Nueva Unión, Loreto, Peru, 27 for agreeing to participate in this research. Further thanks are due to Sam Staddon and Mary 28 Menton for advice on community benefits, Michael Gilmore on participatory mapping, Harry 29 Walker on doing research in Urarina communities, Greta Dargie on peat and peatland 30 characteristics, Eurídice Honorio Coronado, Tim Baker, Jhon del Aguila Pasquel, and Ricardo 31 Zárate on the ecology of the area, and Althea Davies for comments on an earlier version of this 32 manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • Polysynthetic Structures of Lowland Amazonia
    OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – REVISES, Sat Aug 19 2017, NEWGEN Chapter 15 Polysynthetic Structures of Lowland Amazonia Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald 15.1 Lowland Amazonian languages: a backdrop The Amazon basin is an area of high linguistic diversity (rivalled only by the island of New Guinea). It comprises around 350 languages grouped into over fifteen language families, in addition to a number of isolates. The six major linguistic families of the Amazon basin are as follows. • The Arawak language family is the largest in South America in terms of its geographical spread, with over forty extant languages between the Caribbean and Argentina. Well- established subgroups include Campa in Peru and a few small North Arawak groupings in Brazil and Venezuela. Arawak languages are spoken in at least ten locations north of the River Amazon, and in at least ten south of it. European languages contain a number of loans from Arawak languages, among them hammock and tobacco. • The Tupí language family consists of about seventy languages; nine of its ten branches are spoken exclusively in Amazonia. The largest branch, Tupí- Guaraní, extends beyond the Amazonian Basin into Bolivia and Paraguay. Loans from Tupí-Guaraní languages include jaguar and jacaranda. • Carib languages number about twenty five, and are spoken in various locations in Brazil and Venezuela in northern Amazonia, and in the region of the Upper Xingu and adjacent areas of Mato Grosso in Brazil south of the River Amazon. The place name ‘Caribbean’ and the noun cannibal (a version of the ethnonym ‘Carib’) are a legacy from Carib languages. • Panoan languages number about thirty, and are spoken on the eastern side of the Andes in Peru and adjacent areas of Brazil.
    [Show full text]
  • The Amazonian Peoples' Resources Initiative (APRI) Is a Human Rights Organization Working
    P r o f i d e s THE AMAZONIAN PEOPLES'RESOURCES INITIATIVE: Promoting Reproductive Rights and Community Development in the Peruvian Amazon Bartholomew Dean, Eliana Elias Valdeavellano, Michelle McKinley, and Rebekah Saul [R]eproductive rights ... rest on the recognition of the basic right of couples and individuals to decide freely and responsibly the number, spacing and timing of their children and to have the information and means to do so, and the right to attain the high- est standard of sexual and reproductive health . .. [taking] into account the needs of their living and future children and their responsibilities towards the community. The promotion of the responsible exercise of these rights for all people should be the fundamental basis for ... community-supported policies and pro- grammes in the area of reproductive health.... Programmeof Action adopted at the International Conference on Population and Development, Cairo, 1994, Paragraph7.3 IFounded in 1995, the Amazonian Peoples' Resources Initiative (APRI) is a human rights organization working Bartholomew Dean, PhD, is an assistant professor of anthropology at the University of Kansas and the research director of the Amazonian People's Resources Initiative (APRI). Eliana Elias Valdeavellano is the executive director of Minga-Peru. Michelle McKinley, JD, is the director of APRI. Rebekah Saul is a research and public policy associate at APRI. Please address correspondence to the authors care of Bartholomew Dean, 202 SpoonerHall, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA or to [email protected]. Copyright C 2000 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. HEALTH AND HuMAN RIGHTS 219 The President and Fellows of Harvard College is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve, and extend access to Health and Human Rights ® www.jstor.org with rural and indigenous communities in the Peruvian Amazon.
    [Show full text]
  • Descriptive and Comparative Research on South American Indian Languages
    Historical overview: Descriptive and comparative research on South American Indian languages Willem F. H. Adelaar 1. Introduction The extreme language diversity that was characteristic for South America must have been a challenge to native groups throughout the subcontinent, struggling to maintain commercial and political relations with each other. Due to the absence of phonetically based writing systems in pre-European times there is hardly any documentation about the way cross-linguistic communication was achieved. How- ever, the outlines of a conscious linguistic policy can be assumed from the Incas’ success in imposing their language upon a millenary multilingual society. Second- language learning, often by users of typologically widely different languages, must have been an everyday concern to the subjects of the Inca empire. Sixteenth-cen- tury chroniclers often report in a matter-of-fact way on the ease and rapidity with which native Americans mastered the language of their conquerors, be it Quechua, Spanish or any other language. Apart from such cases of political necessity, there are indications that language played an essential role in many South American native societies and that it could be manipulated and modified in a deliberate way. The use of stylistic speech levels among the Cuna (Sherzer 1983) and of ceremo- nial discourse among the Mbyá (Cadogan 1959; Clastres 1974), the Shuar (Gnerre 1986) and the Trio (Carlin 2004), the appreciation of rhetorical skill as a requisite for leadership among the Mapuche, the distinction of female and masculine speech among the Karajá (Rodrigues 2004) and the Chiquitano (Galeote 1993), the associ- ation of language choice and family lineage among the peoples of the Vaupés region (Sorensen 1967; Aikhenvald 2002), and the association of language choice and professional occupation in highland Bolivia (Howard 1995) appear to indicate an awareness of linguistic functionality not limited to daily communication alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Equality Without Equivalence: an Anthropology of the Common&
    Equality without equivalence: an anthropology of the common Harry Walker London School of Economics and Political Science This article elaborates an Amazonian conception of the common and the challenge it poses to Western thinking about individualism and equality. It is suggested that a number of distinctive features of Amazonian Urarina sociality may have their basis in a shared refusal of factors that give rise to relations of equivalence between people. This kind of singularism, or ‘individualism without individuals’, results from an orientation to the common as a collective resource that is antithetical to property, in which subjectivity is shaped in relation to wider ecological and affective resources that are continuously and collectively produced. This embraces not only shared economic resources, such as land or game animals, but also ways of organizing and producing affective, cognitive, and linguistic relations, ‘commonalities’ of various kinds which never reduce differences to an abstract subject, such as the individual of liberalism or the collective of socialism. In Coral gardens and their magic, Malinowski railed against two grand themes of nineteenth-century anthropology: the notion of ‘primitive communism’; and the idea of a general evolution of social forms from communal to individual. ‘There is no more jejune and fruitless distinction in primitive sociology’, he concluded, ‘than that between individualism and Communism’ (1966: 380). The Trobrianders exemplified a subtle blending of the two: while almost all work was done by co-operative groups, for example, these were cross-cut by individual land titles, a highly developed sense of individuality, and strong desires for individual distinctions (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • The Linguistic Expression of Affective Stance in Yaminawa (Pano, Peru)
    The Linguistic Expression of Affective Stance in Yaminawa (Pano, Peru) By Kelsey Caitlyn Neely A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Lev D. Michael, Chair Professor Eve Sweetser Professor Justin Davidson Summer 2019 Copyright by Kelsey Caitlyn Neely Abstract The Linguistic Expression of Affective Stance in Yaminawa (Pano, Peru) by Kelsey Caitlyn Neely Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics University of California, Berkeley Professor Lev D. Michael, Chair This dissertation explores affective expression in Yaminawa, a Panoan language ofPe- ruvian Amazonia. In this study, ‘affect’ is used to refer broadly to the English language concepts of ‘emotion’ and ‘feeling’. Affective expression is approached as an interac- tional phenomenon and it is analyzed in terms of affective stancetaking, i.e., the way speakers position themselves to objects in the discourse as well as their interlocutors via linguistic performance. This study considers affective resources at the levels of the lex- icon, morphology, prosody, acoustics (voice quality, speech rate and volume, etc.), and interactional features (turn duration, complexity of backchannels, etc.). This study contextualizes affective expression in Yaminawa with a detailed descrip- tion of Yaminawa ethnopsychology and the lexical resources that describe affective states, as well as behaviors and bodily sensations that are associated with particular affects by the Yaminawa. Using methods from Cognitive Anthropology, I investigate the ways that native Yaminawa speakers categorize emotion terms, and show that prosociality vs. anti- sociality is a major cultural axis along which emotion terms are conceptually organized.
    [Show full text]