PUDDING MILL

Consultation report

Fluid 2016

PUDDING MILL

CONTENTS

CHAPTER 1 CHAPTER 4 SUMMARY 5 FINDINGS 43 1.1 Introduction 5 4.1 Overview 43 1.2 Summary of events & involvement 6 4.2 Comments at a glance 44 1.3 Masterplan Key Themes 8 4.3 Events feedback 46 1.4 Synopsis of responses 11 1.5 Summary of findings 12 CHAPTER 5 1.6 Synopsis of findings 14 TRACKING CHANGES & NEXT STEPS 59 1.7 Recommendations 18 5.1 Tracking Changes 59 5.2 Next Steps 59 CHAPTER 2 BACKGROUND 21 APPENDICES 61 2.1 Pudding Mill 21 A. Publicity & communications 62 2.2 About Pudding Mill 22 B. Stakeholder mapping 2.3 Who is involved 23 67 C. Main exhibition materials 2.4 Context 24 70 D. Pop up materials 2.4 About the site: Opportunities 26 84 2.5 About the site: Constraints 28

CHAPTER 3 CONSULTATION PROCESS 31 3.1 Overview 31 3.2 Consultation diary 32 3.3 Communication, promotion & wayfinding 34 3.4 Activities & events 36 3.5 Community involvement: 40

3

PUDDING MILL

CHAPTER 1 SUMMARY

1.1 Introduction Community consultation Pudding Mill is a 8.4 hectare brownfield site that forms part of As part of the masterplanning team, the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Fluid was appointed by LLDC to carry out community consultation estate. It is immediately bounded to inform development of the by the Waterworks River to the masterplan. The aims of this process northeast and Bow Back River are to: to the southeast, with the Great Eastern Railway viaduct to the • Raise awareness of the project north and Cooks Road to the west. and masterplan development. The City Mill River and Greenway • Gather aspirations and form a natural division within the understand key issues with site, creating two adjacent plots regard to the Pudding Mill that have been termed Pudding masterplan for the surrounding Mill and Bridgewater and which communities. together will form the Pudding Mill neighbourhood. These plots are at • Be inclusive, accessible, different levels but are connected transparent and engaging. via a pedestrian/cycle route off the • Facilitate a variety of different Greenway and have two separate ways for people to get involved. means of vehicular access. Both • Clearly communicate the sites are largely vacant at present feedback from the community except for interim site compounds, to LLDC and the masterplanning although the Bridgewater site team. includes newly formed allotments.

This report documents the activities, findings and outcomes from the first and second stage of the consultation process and will inform the Statement of Participation to be submitted as part of the future Pudding Mill planning application.

5 Chapter 1 | Summary 1.2 Summary of events & involvement

1.2 Summary of events & Feeding into the masterplan involvement

The first stage of consultation took The findings from the consultation place in February 2016 at a one-day have been discussed with LLDC public exhibition held at the London and the masterplanning team to Aquatic Centre in conjunction help inform the development of the with the Cultural and Education masterplan. Below is an overview of District consultation. the process:

The public exhibition was an • Initial findings from events have opportunity to raise awareness of been fed back to the wider team the project, inform the public why shortly after the consultation the masterplan is being re-visited, period. provide background information on the Legacy Communities Scheme • A dedicated session with the planning application and share the project team to present and project’s objectives, constraints discuss the consultation findings. and opportunities. The public were • To inform the next stage informed about the broad stages of consultation, the project of the consultation programme team aims to address the key and the opportunities for them to issues raised in Stage 2 where get involved and help shape the appropriate. development of the masterplan. • This report is a record of the The second stage of consultation process that will ultimately started in July 2016 and was inform the Statement of attended by approximately 2,729 Participation and will be part of people, out of which 697 people the planning application. signed up to be kept informed on Over the course of the consultation Pudding Mill. Stage 2 events were as the project team has listened to follows: and wherever possible responded to the views expressed through • 3 Pop-up events in Hackney this consultation, alongside those Wick and Stratford Shopping of key stakeholders and Statutory Centre Consultees (such as Transport for • Public Exhibition held over nine London). days at the London Aquatics Centre in conjunction with the As the masterplan develops we will Cultural and Educational District track how community feedback has consultation influenced the masterplan. • Targeted resident session

Findings from the engagement will test the masterplan principles and help inform development of the masterplan, and targetted engagement will be carried out between November 2016 and early 2017.

Event information was circulated to over 21,000 local residents and businesses, alongside information available on the project web site.

6 Chapter 1 | Summary 1.2 Summary of events & involvement

people attended the public 2,729 exhibition

Pop-up - Stratford Shopping Centre Pop-up - Wick Green, Hackney Wick 64 completed feedback

forms at the Exhibition

Comments received through pre-printed and online feedback 200 forms

21,000 event flyers delivered locally

people signed Public exhibition - London Aquatics Centre up to be kept informed on 697 Pudding Mill

7 Chapter 1 | Summary 1.3 Masterplan Key Themes

1.3 Masterplan Key Themes

The masterplan was presented under three key themes that relate to the planning process and the strategic objectives of LLDC.

A vibrant local centre: A diverse residential Public Spaces and Play Movement & connectivity neighbourhood: Spaces: Character & form Public Space Creation of a new square adjacent to Pudding Mill A diverse residential Each public space within Lane DLR will be a neighbourhood comprised the masterplan responds significant point of of a network of close, directly to its immediate arrival linking the heart intimate streets and context and is connected of the new development shared spaces connecting through a variety of to the DLR station and a series of distinct public streets and shared spaces. the wider area. Active spaces with larger more Play space provision will ground floor uses will formal blocks dissected offer a range of leisure and help encourage by mews streets and recreation opportunities movement towards passages. for users of all ages. Marshgate Lane. A diverse residential Public Spaces and Play A vibrant local centre: neighbourhood: Spaces: Retail and employment A range of housing Greenway typologies Creation of new Although Pudding Mill employment spaces A diversity of typologies, is somewhat isolated around Pudding Mill Lane from mews houses to at present it has the DLR Station will add stacked maisonettes, potential to become a vibrancy and vitality to mansion blocks to well-connected site with within the Local Centre residential buildings.. improved pedestrian and and support Marshgate cycle links to the Park, Lane as a new local high access on to the Greenway street. Retail and leisure and reinstated or newly uses located principally provided riverside around the station. towpaths.

8 Chapter 1 | Summary 1.3 Masterplan Key Themes

12 Illustrative masterplan for Pudding Mill

WARTON ROAD

     9         1 

WATERWORKS RIVER

BRIDGEWATER SQUARE

2

GREENWAY

CITY MILL RIVER

11         13            4   9

      

                       5 STRATFORD HIGH STREET

      PUDDING MILL LANE  7    

EAST - WEST STREET 3 6 14 8

                      9 BOW BACK RIVER  

                  10  



                   Station Square    Existing 4 9 Towpath 14 Bow Substation                New 5 Pudding Mill Square  The Greenway  10 Bow Back Square      1 Allotments 6 East - West Street 11 Railway Local Centre

2 Bridgewater Square and 7 Residential blocks connection to Greenway 12 UCL East Improved Mews Connectivity Stratford High Street 8 3 13 Marshgate Yard Pedestrian & Cycle route

Pudding Mill Lane DLR Station

9 Chapter 1 | Summary 1.3 Masterplan Key Themes

Birds-eye view looking south-west over the Pudding Mill site

PUDDING MILL SITE

10 Chapter 1 | Summary 1.4 Synopsis of responses

1.4 Synopsis of responses The response to the emerging masterplan for Concern exists over the loss of light and views from Pudding Mill has been very positive with high the allotment holders and residents of surrounding levels of support. residential buildings such as Ruby Court and Otter Close. The approach to design, architecture and identity received the greatest level of feedback, the Types of Feedback majority of which was very supportive. All comments have been considered and each The provision of retail, community facilities and categorized by the topic it references. In total 200 employment spaces in the new Local Centre comments were collected from both the feedback also received a high level of positive response. forms at the exhibition in the Aquatics Centre and the Additionally the ambition to provide new housing online version available. to meet local needs was welcomed and well received. Analysing in this way enables a transparent and Consultees were very supportive of the proposals rigorous process in order to unveil particular to provide new pedestrian and cycle routes to emerging themes and areas of interest. Below is a connect Pudding Mill to Queen Elizabeth Olympic high level summary of the key issues at this stage of Park and the surrounding area. consultation; alongside a diagram showing how often Feedback highlighted that people feel the different topic areas were commented on and where masterplan provides a good range of open spaces the comments came from (Local residents, visitors or and play provision. Although not forming part of individuals that are members of organisations). the Pudding Mill site, comments were received over the loss of green space in Queen Elizabeth Olympic Overleaf is a slightly more in-depth summary of Park due to the Cultural and Education District feedback received. developments. Local residents currently make use of these open spaces and requested more detailed information with regards to the public open spaces proposed for Pudding Mill.

Topics most discussed during stage 2 of consultation

Design / identity / scale / architecture 32.5 %

Community benefit / facilities / involvement 17 %

Access & movement 12 %

Open / public places 9.5 % Each unit approx. 1%

Retail / Food & Drink 8.5 % Local Residents Visitors Housing & accomodation 8 % Member of an organisation Unknown Others 7 %

Jobs / employment 3 %

Masterplanning process / timescale 2.5 %

Approximate percentage of comments

11 Chapter 1 | Summary 1.5 Summary of findings

1.5 Summary of findings 1 | WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL IMPRESSION OF THE PROPOSALS FOR PUDDING MILL?

The main method of gathering feedback was through either pre-printed or an No answer | 7% online feedback form that asked people Excited | 24% questions on themes relating to the Unsure | 3% masterplan. 64 forms were returned. Neutral | 9% The following diagrams show the quantitative responses to the feedback form questions.

74% OF RESPONDEES ARE EITHER EXCITED OR FEEL GENERALLY POSITIVE ABOUT THE PROPOSALS FOR PUDDING MILL

Generally positive | 56%

ARE YOU A ...? 2 | DO YOU SUPPORT THE ASPIRATION TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL HOUSING AT PUDDING MILL TO MEET LOCAL NEEDS?

Don’t know | 6% Visitor | 20% Local Resident | 41% No answer | 9% Yes | 82%

No | 3%

Unknown | 31%

Part of an organisation | 8%

3 | DO YOU SUPPORT OUR VIEW FOR THE NEW LOCAL 4 | HOW WELL DO YOU THINK THE MASTERPLAN CENTRE AT PUDDING MILL PROVIDING FLEXIBLE CONNECTS TO THE WIDER AREA THROUGH NEW EMPLOYMENT AND RETAIL FLOORSPACE, AS WELL AS NEW PEDESTRIAN, CYCLING AND PUBLIC TRANSPORT ROUTES? COMMUNITY FACILITIES?

Not enough No answer connections | 17% Don’t know | 15% | 11% Yes | 71% No answer | 12% Don’t know | 17%

No | 2% Too many connections | 5%

Just enough connections | 50%

12 Chapter 1 | Summary 1.5 Summary of findings

5 | HOW WELL DO YOU THINK THE MASTERPLAN PROVIDES A GOOD 6 | DO YOU AGREE WITH THE APPROACH TO CHARACTER AND FORM? RANGE OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACES, INCLUDING PLAY PROVISION, FOR USE BY THE FUTURE RESIDENTS, VISITORS AND SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES?

Strongly agree No answer | 14% No answer | 22% | 16% Very well | 24%

Strongly Don’t know | 12% disagree | 3%

Disagree | 3%

Poorly | 6%

Don’t know |15% Agree | 41% Well | 44%

7 | DO YOU EVER USE PUDDING MILL AT PRESENT? 7A | IF SO WHY?

Other | 7% No answer | 14% Yes | 31% DLR station | 41%

Allotments | 19%

No | 55% Access to park | 33%

7B | IF NOT, WILL THE PROPOSALS 8 | HAVE YOU FOUND THIS EVENT INFORMATIVE? PRESENTED HERE TODAY ENCOURAGE YOU TO DO SO ?

No answer | 14% No answer | 31% Yes | 75% Yes | 47% Don’t Know | 5%

No | 6%

Don’t Know | 15%

No | 7%

13 Chapter 1 | Summary 1.6 Synopsis of findings

1.6 Synopsis of findings

The summaries to the right give an overview of the feedback received in Stages one and two, categorised into a number of overarching topics.

These topics have been informed by the areas that received most discussion and debate in the first stage of consultation.

As the consultation process continues, Σ we will reference back to these topic areas to track feedback and how the masterplan has sought to address the issues raised. Overall Impression

“I have been in Stratford since 2008 and have a much more positive view of this proposal than the earlier plans presented for the post-Olympic legacy.” • More than three quarters (78.3%) of all respondents reacted positively to the proposals for Pudding Mill. A quarter (25%) of the respondents expressed that they feel ‘excited’ about the proposals. Additionally more than half of the respondents (53.3%) expressed feeling ‘generally positive’ about the proposals for Pudding Mill. • Local residents who took part in the consultation responded with very high levels of support. 21% of residents feel ‘excited’ about the proposals whilst 50% of residents feel ‘generally positive’ meaning 71% of the comments received from local residents were positive about the proposals.

14 Chapter 1 | Summary 1.6 Synopsis of findings

1 | A vibrant Local Centre

Retail & employment Movement & connectivity

“There needs to be space for local “Linking areas south of Stratford businesses not just large businesses. High Street, through Pudding Mill & Would be good to see short hold Bridgewater to UCL East and beyond. tenancies (12 months) to encourage small Admittedly difficult due to constraints, business/start ups.” but current routes are convoluted and “Independent cafe, independent pub, difficult to find.” independent green grocer”

With the surrounding area Local Centre • Respondents identified • The proposed Local Centre for providing strong connections for Pudding Mill received very high Pudding Mill to the surrounding rates of support with over 70% areas as a priority. of respondents supporting the need for a new Local Centre at Pudding Mill to provide Lack of clarity in the masterplan flexible employment and retail • Comments indicate a lack floorspace, as well as new of clarity in the proposed community facilities. masterplan and the need for connectivity to be one of the key drivers. Independent retail outlets • Concerns were raised about the Opportunities and suggestions affordability of the proposed • Waterways and the Greenway retail units and there is a desire are one of the areas strongest to see small, local and community features and could be further orientated amenities. explored as avenues to connect the area to its surroundings. Independent food & drink • Respondents have suggested a Open to sustainable modes of need for independent and local transport businesses to provide the food • Comments written on feedback and drink offer rather than well- forms show an openness to known chains. change, with people accepting and encouraging new sustainable modes of transport such as cycling and pedestrian routes. Only one out of 200 comments mentioned the lack of parking spaces in the new proposals as a problem. 15 Chapter 1 | Summary 1.6 Synopsis of findings

2 | Public open spaces and play space

Public open space and play Greenway provision “Make more of the Greenway! More “Lots of great public realm opportunities Santander cycle stops” and an exciting new hub for London” Opportunities for the Greenway to be “Would still love to see more open space, a sustainable transport highway but understand economics.” • Respondents commented on the necessity to take advantage • The public open space and of the Greenway, for example play provision detailed in installing bicycle rental points the proposals for Pudding along its length. Mill were received with high levels of approval: 24% of all • One comment was received respondents answered ‘very suggesting better lighting from positively’ and 44% responded the Greenway to the DLR station ‘positively’. In contrast only 6% to improve safety. of all respondents think that the public open space and play • Respondents also voiced concern space provision in the current that the cycling network is not masterplan is poor. clearly shown in the masterplan.

Opportunities for green space along the waterways • Some comments voiced concern over the density and lack of green spaces and also identified the waterways as a means to provide green open space that will promote greater biodiversity.

• Other concerns included the loss of green open space provided at the moment by Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park.

16 Chapter 1 | Summary 1.6 Synopsis of findings

3 | A diverse residential neighbourhood

A range of building typologies Character & form Other comments & questions

“I like the proposal for more mews/ “Like the relatively low rise form and Phasing terrace/townhouses.” predominantly brick construction” “A phasing programme would be welcome as unsure if all the proposed “Good mix of residential and small “Overall idea seems sensible & developments will commence at the retail space to provide a vibrant new reasonable particularly with regard to same time.” community for residents” social housing. However from a personal perspective I am concerned about • Local residents voiced Affordable housing the height of the proposed residential concerns about the number of • The provision of additional buildings either side of Otter Close.” developments in the area and housing at Pudding Mill was the lack of clarity on phasing: overwhelmingly well received Massing and tall buildings strategy this should be addressed. (with 82% of all responses being • Overall there was strong positive), however concern support for the massing and Current use exists over the affordability of tall buildings strategy being • Less than a third of the the new homes and potential proposed for Pudding Mill. respondents currently use gentrification of the area. Pudding Mill. Currently Concerns over scale and views from respondents indicate that they A flexible neighbourhood with existing residents and users use Pudding Mill in order to use community facilities the DLR station (41%); to access • There are however concerns • Feedback was received Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park over a perceived loss of light suggesting Pudding Mill would (33%) and to gain access to the and views from both the be able to accommodate allotments (18%). allotment holders and residents a diverse community by of Otter Close and Ruby Court. providing a good range of Consultation events community facilities such as • Respondents indicated that the indoor and outdoor leisure events were informative. facilities, a community centre and youth centre.

Social infrastructure • Comments were received expressing concern over the lack of social infrastructure facilities in the proposal such as schools, GPs, nurseries, dentists and libraries.

17 Chapter 1 | Summary 1.7 Recommendations

1.7 Recommendations Process recommendations Feedback throughout the second stage of consultation has been A. Heard through consultation B. Fluid recommendations very positive with regards to the The comments below were heard The following recommendations proposals for Pudding Mill. during the consultation and relate are made by Fluid after carrying to items outside of scope of the out the first and second stage Recommendations for the masterplan itself. of consultation. These relate to masterplan and next stages of the the wider process and not to the consultation process are summarised • Continue to carry out community masterplan. below: consultation and engagement throughout the development and • The findings from the Draft masterplan: next step delivery of the masterplan. consultation on the masterplan recommendations should inform a brief that will • Involve the local residents in be given to the detailed design The headline findings on page 9 the engagement process to team. A mechanism should (and in more detail on pages 12 ensure the development does also be put in place to ensure to 14) provide an overview of the not negatively impact these feedback received now, that is community recommendations and communities. relevant to later stages, is re- suggestions for developing the visited and considered at the masterplan. Below are a number of appropriate stage. recommendations for the next stage of consultation: • At stage 3 of consultation, develop responses to the • Show how Pudding Mill will be key issues raised to date. connected to the surrounding Demonstrating how they areas. Specifically more have been addressed and information on provision for influenced the masterplan where pedestrians and cyclists. appropriate. • Provide more information on the • Ensure that the voice of local types of public spaces and play residents groups and community provision. groups continue to be heard. • Clarify the provision of social infrastructure such as health and education facilities as well as the different types of employment and retail. • Commission a study to assess the impact of new development on the existing allotments and homes in terms of daylight, sunlight and views. • Clarify the quantum of affordable housing to be provided within the Pudding Mill development. • Provide a construction phasing programme for Pudding Mill and information on other major developments in the surrounding area in order to minimise disruption.

18 Chapter 1 | Summary 1.7 Recommendations

Public exhibition - London Aquatics Centre

Pop-up - Stour Space, Hackney Wick

19

PUDDING MILL

CHAPTER 2 BACKGROUND

2.1 Pudding Mill The Legacy Communities Scheme The Legacy Corporation is revisiting (LCS) planning application, which the Pudding Mill masterplan in was approved in September 2012, response to the changing context of proposed a range of employment adjoining developments, including and residential uses at Pudding Mill, the Cultural and Education District. as well as other supporting social infrastructure and open space The Legacy Corporation wants to create a vibrant Local Centre In total the scheme allowed for at the heart of Pudding Mill, as around 1,300 homes, plus a range of supported by the Local Plan, which employment floorspace, retail units maximises residential capacity and and community facilities. employment opportunities, as well as meeting key priorities around local economic benefit, equality and inclusion, sustainability and community engagement.

Background - Legacy Communities Scheme

Illustrative Masterplan Produced for LCS (2012)

21 Chapter 2 | Background 2.2 About Pudding Mill

2.2 About Pudding Mill The new development will seek The neighbourhood will include: to improve pedestrian and cycle • New homes, including sheltered The Pudding Mill masterplan connections through the site accommodation aims to create a new residential and maximise the opportunities neighbourhood with a vibrant presented by its proximity to • Flexible employment space Local Centre, providing a range Pudding Mill Lane DLR station and • Retail units of housing typologies to meet Stratford High Street, as well as local need, as well as flexible Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park. • Social infrastructure employment floorspace, retail units and community facilities; all tied • Play space together through a high quality • Leisure space public realm.

Pudding Mill

Birds-eye view looking over Pudding Mill

London Stadium London Aquatics Centre

22 Chapter 2 | Background 2.3 Who is involved

2.3 Who is involved

London Legacy Development Allies & Morrison Bradley-Hole Schoenaich Landscape Corporation (LLDC) Architects Role: Masterplanners Role: Landowner and developer Role: Landscape Architects Allies and Morrison is an Formed in April 2012, LLDC’s architecture and urban planning Bradley-Hole Schoenaich Landscape purpose is to use the once-in-a- practice based in London. Having Architects, BHSLA, provide lifetime opportunity of the Olympic been appointed as masterplanners design services for contemporary Games and the creation of Queen for Pudding Mill, our aim is to landscapes. Elizabeth Olympic Park to develop a develop proposals that integrate dynamic new heart for east London, into their context and to maximise BHSLA, provide design services for creating opportunities for local the site’s potential to promote the contemporary landscapes. Their people and driving innovation and regeneration of the wider area. focus is to create the high quality growth in London and the UK. public landscape that offers a We place considerable emphasis variety of spaces and activities, a LLDC is responsible for delivering on a detailed analysis of the brief network of multipurpose amenity one of the most important Olympic and the development of a clear spaces that integrate into existing legacy promises - the long-term understanding of the aspirations landscape infrastructure. Their planning, development, management of our clients and neighbouring design accommodates a combination and maintenance of the Park and its communitites. Our designs then of different scales and characters of impact on the surrounding area after evolve as a direct response to this, trees that address given constraints the London 2012 Games. and to their context, in order to of proposed public spaces, but create good places that complement also contribute to the identity of and add to their locality, offer each individual streets, squares, delight to those who use them and greens and yard while providing AECOM foster community. continuous dynamic tree canopy. Their horticultural expertise allows Role: Planning Agent & We enjoy simplicity, believing that BHSLA to innovate successfully with Environmental Consultant coherent and modest buildings, dynamic vegetation concepts set informed by an integrated approach within an architectural framework. AECOM is appointed as the to sustainability and longevity, Planning Consultant to support the are more likely to stand the test of preparation of planning applications time. And our interest in craft and for CED and obtaining planning in quality underpins the technical permissions. AECOM are leading rigour of our approach, from the and coordinating the preparation macro through to the micro scales. and submission of the planning application for Pudding Mill, including the preparation of the Environmental Impact Assessment and Transport Assessment.

23 Chapter 2 | Background 2.4 Context

2.4 Context 6 BOBBY MOORE ACADEMY 13 CHOBHAM FARM (PROSPECT EAST) Summary: A sports specialist secondary Summary: A new family neighbourhood A fast changing area school and primary school with a 6th form delivering around 1000 homes (of which across two sites. over 40% are family homes), home zone Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park and Status: Under construction streets, new public space, commercial space and community facilities. its surroundings are significant areas Proposed operator: David Ross of change in one of the most exciting Education Trust Status: Prospect East first residents moved in and fastest-growing areas in London. Developer: LCR and East Thames Group Here are some of the projects 7 PUDDING MILL Summary: A residential neighbourhood that around the site. will deliver up to 1,300 homes, employment 14 INTERNATIONAL QUARTER LONDON floorspace, retail units, community facilities, Summary: 4 million sq ft of new workplace and a wide range of public open spaces. - TFL and the FCA confirmed as tenants. 1 EAST WICK Status: Outline planning permission A 4 star hotel, shops, restaurants, childcare Summary: Up to 870 new homes, new granted with amendments currently being and community facilities. Up to 25,000 jobs primary school and two new nurseries. considered by LLDC created. Status: Zonal masterplan approved Developer: London Legacy Development Status: Construction started in 2014, first December 2015, Phase 1 detailed design Corporation office occupation in 2017 planning permission granted Developer: Lend Lease and LCR Developer: London Legacy Development 8 RICK ROBERTS WAY Corporation, East Wick and Sweetwater Summary: Provision of approx. 500 new Projects Ltd homes as part of a mixed-use masterplan. 15 GLASSHOUSE GARDENS Status: Outline planning permission granted, Summary: The residential development that forms part of International Quarter London 2 SWEETWATER with secondary school relocated within PDZ3 (see no. 6) and further amendments - 330 new homes looking out over the iconic Summary: Up to 650 new homes under consideration buildings of the south of the Park as part of including apartments and family homes. International Quarter London. A new primary school, two new nurseries, Developer: London Legacy Development community space, a library and health Corporation and the London Borough of Status: First residents moved in October centre. Newham 2016 Status: Outline planning permission granted Developer: Lend Lease and LCR Developer: London Legacy Development 9 HERE EAST Corporation, East Wick and Sweetwater Summary: Transforming the former Olympic Projects Ltd Press and Broadcast Centre – an innovation 16 CHERRY PARK centre set to provide over 1.2 million square Summary: Approx 1,200 new homes feet of space for creative entrepreneurs alongside community facilities, restaurants, 3 HACKNEY WICK CENTRAL and creating up to 7,500 jobs on site and in cafes and a servicing facility for Marks and the local community. Key tenants include Spencer. Summary: Creation of a new neighbourhood BT Sport, Hackney Community College, centre focused around Hackney Wick Loughborough University and Infinity SDC. Status: Hybrid planning application Station. The new station which includes an submitted underpass through the existing embankment Status: BT Sport already broadcast on site, will create a new north – south pedestrian fully operational by 2018 Developer: Stratford City Developments Ltd link. The neighbourhood centre development will consist of workspace clusters with Developer: iCITY, a joint venture between Delancey and Infinity SDC a diverse range of spaces, retail, local 17 ANGEL LANE amenities, and the introduction of between Summary: Unite student accommodation for 800-850 new homes. 10 CHOBHAM MANOR 750 students, new hotel, a major apartment Status: Planning permission granted for Summary: The first of the five new tower and offices. the new station. Outline application for neighbourhoods from 2015. Including 828 Status: Opened September 2015 the Hackney Wick Neighbourhood Centre new homes, 75% designed for families and planning permission approved. 1/3 affordable homes. Shops, cafes, bars Developer: Unite Group Plc and other facilities will support a vibrant Developer: London Legacy Development Corporation community. Status: Sales underway, first residents 18 STRAND EAST occupied their homes in late 2015 Summary: 1,200 homes, office spaces for a 4 STRATFORD WATERFRONT & UCL EAST Developer: Chobham Manor LLP range of businesses including digital and Summary: A new campus for UAL’s London creatives, a riverside park and a range of College of Fashion, along with major new retail and community uses. spaces for the Victoria and Albert Museum 11 EAST VILLAGE Status: Planning permission granted and Sadler’s Wells. UCL East - a new Summary: 2,818 new homes, a new school campus for UCL. (Chobham Academy - see point 12), a new Developer: Vastint UK Status: UCL East outline planning health centre, cafés, bars, restaurants, application submitted. shops and 27 acres of public space. Further developments for an additional 2,000 homes Developer: London Legacy Development are currently in the planning process. 19 MARSHGATE Corporation with site partners Status: Now open Summary: 8 new buildings containing approx. 45,000 sq ft of business floorspace, Developer: Get Living London and Triathlon 254 new homes and open space 5 THE LONDON STADIUM Homes Status: Planning permission granted Summary: From 2016 the London Stadium will become the home of West Ham United, Developer: Workspace before then it will host a number of 12 CHOBHAM ACADEMY international events including the Rugby Summary: A new school for 3-18 year olds World Cup in 2015. A new community track that opened in September 2014. In addition will be open alongside the London Stadium to 100 children in the nursery, when the 20 COOK’S ROAD and will be home to the Newham and Essex Academy is at full capacity it will have 600 Summary: Up to 543 residential units, Beagles Athletic Club. The London Stadium students in the primary school, a further 900 approx. 58,000 sq ft of commercial will also become the new national centre students in the secondary school and a Sixth floorspace and open spaces and landscaping for athletics from 2016. Form for 420. Status: The application for the southern Status: Opened summer 2016 Status: Now open block has been approved. Developer: E20 Stadium LLP Developer: A Lend Lease Harris Partnership Developer: Bellway 24 Chapter 2 | Background 2.4 Context

12

10 9 WICK STRATFORD NEW TOWN 11

13 1 14

3

17 2 14 4 16

15 6 BOW EAST 5

6

7

8

7 20

19

18 Pudding Mill Site Boundary LLDC Boundary LB Hackney Boundary LB Newham Boundary LB Tower Hamlets Boundary Health Centre Education / Training Workspace BROMLEY- BY-BOW Cultural / Exhibition Business Hotel / Student Housing Community Facilities Retail / Leisure N Sport Surrounding Area

Plan showing some of the major developments in the area. (Dots do not indicate locations of facilities) 25 Chapter 2 | Background 2.4 About the site: Opportunities

2.4 About the site: Opportunities

The setting of Pudding Mill provides incredible opportunities to make the most out of the site’s unique geographic features and strategic location. Still, there are Bridgewater constraints within the site that limit possibilities. Key considerations that work in favour of Pudding Mill are highlighted below; factors that are limiting are outlined on the Pudding Mill following pages.

Character Areas The natural division of the site allows for the creation of two distinct, yet interconnected neighbourhoods: a vibrant urban neighbourhood at Pudding Mill defined by the Local Centre and a more domestic and relaxed neighbourhood at Bridgewater. Pudding Mill site and Local Centre.

Transport Connections Pudding Mill DLR Station, re-opened in 2014, provides direct access to Stratford Station in just 2 minutes, which acts as an interchange for various onward connections across London.

Pudding Mill DLR station

26 Chapter 2 | Background 2.4 About the site: Opportunities

Connectivity At present Pudding Mill is somewhat isolated, being bounded by various barriers to pedestrian or vehicular movement. The masterplan will explore opportunities to promote new or improved connections to the Park and Stratford High Street, as well as Warton Road. The masterplan will consider the hierarchy of these connections and how they should be linked to new internal routes across Pudding Mill.

Pudding Mill’s transport connetions and waterways

Waterways Pudding Mill benefits from close proximity to a variety of waterways, with rivers surrounding it on three sides. The masterplan will provide appropriate responses to this special setting by taking into account strategic views and pedestrian movement patterns.

Bowback River

27 Chapter 2 | Background 2.5 About the site: Constraints

2.5 About the site: Constraints

Underground utilities A number of underground constraints such as Power Lines Underground (PLUG), HV cables and their easements as well as utilities within existing roads impact the development of the site.

Pudding Mill site and underground utilities Railway Viaduct The Great Eastern Railway/Crossrail/ DLR viaduct bounds Pudding Mill to the north. Whilst the station itself will offer a degree of active frontage, the viaduct west of the station is comprised of a blank concrete wall. To the east of the station, the Marshgate Lane underpass separates vehicular and pedestrian routes by way of a significant drop in level.

DLR Viaduct

28 Chapter 2 | Background 2.5 About the site: Constraints

Bow Electricity Substation, Bow Electricity Substation and the new headhouses for the underground power lines are situated in the centre of Pudding Mill, on either side of Pudding Mill Lane. These enclosures form part of London’s strategic infrastructure network and have specific operational constraints that need to be respected. They therefore require careful integration into the layout of the neighbourhood to avoid stretches of uninhabited frontage alongside poor quality public space.

Pudding Mill site and Bow Substation

Bow Electricity Substation

29

PUDDING MILL

CHAPTER 3 CONSULTATION PROCESS

3.1 Overview

Consultation on the Pudding Mill masterplan is a process, involving stakeholders and the community at each key stage of design development. Below is a broad overview of the aims of each stage. The following pages detail Stage 1 and Stage 2 activities that have taken place, as well as outlining the aspirations of Stage 3.

Stage 1 | Issues, opportunities & information sharing Stage 1 involved consultation on the masterplan brief and introduction to the site conditions and changing context, as well as the relationship of the masterplan to the schemes being developed at Stratford Waterfront and UCL East. • The first stage aimed to raise awareness of the project and masterplan brief with local stakeholders and the local community, including key groups such as local residents. • Consultation was focused on raising awareness and sharing information on the opportunities and constraints as well as the overarching masterplan principles. Stage 2 | Emerging Masterplan • Stage 2 continued to raise project awareness, with pop up road show events in key locations (Stratford and Hackney Wick) and a public exhibition in the London Aquatics Centre held in conjunction with the Stage 3 Cultural and Education District exhibition. The aim has been to inform and involve a representative cross section of the local community and future users of the site. • Consultation on the emerging masterplan has enabled the gathering of feedback to help develop and deliver a masterplan that is fine tuned to both local aspirations and Pudding Mill’s masterplan objectives. Stage 3 | Pre-submission public exhibition The public exhibition will be an information sharing session before the proposals are submitted for planning approval. The event will offer an opportunity to the public to view the final masterplan and speak to a member of LLDC or the project team.

31 Chapter 3 | Consultation process 3.2 Consultation diary

3.2 Consultation diary

What has happened so far The first and second stages of the process have aimed to involve as many people as possible through a variety of events and publications that are accessible and appropriate for the many communities and stakeholders connected to the project. 30 JULY - 13 AUGUST Main Exhibition in the London 9 - 12 JULY Aquatics Centre held Door-to-door in conjunction with flyer distribution the stage 3 Cultural and Education District exhibition

27 FEBRUARY Cultural and Education District stage 29 JULY 2 and Pudding Soft launch of the 9 days Mill stage 1 Main Exhibition 2,729 attendees exhibition in the 21,000 flyers in the London 64 feedback forms 12 AUGUST London Aquatics 80+ bundles Aquatics Centre held in conjunction Neighbouring Centre plus emails with Cultural and Residents Workshop Education District 11 JULY stage 3 Park Panel 2 AUGUST presentation Workshop Invitations posted

The Marshgate Business Centre Ref No. 06214 219 attendees 10/12 Marshgate Lane, London E15 2NH Date 01.08.2016

Subject: Pudding Mill consultation involvement

Dear Marshgate Business Centre tenants,

I am contacting you on behalf of London Legacy Development Corporation regarding the plans for Pudding Mill.

The London Legacy Development Corporation (LLDC) is developing a masterplan for Pudding Mill that aims to create a unified neighbourhood centre. The masterplan will reflect the wider Cultural and Education District development, and contribute towards local economic benefits, equality and inclusion, sustainability and community engagement.

We are going to be holding a public exhibition for two weeks between 30 July and 13 August in the The Upper Welcome Zone of the London Aquatics Cetre. We are keen to have you attend this exhibition in order to gain your feedback, which will shape the masterplans.

Please RSVP by either emailing [email protected] or calling us on 020 7729 0770.

Thank you very much for your help and we look forward to hearing from you.

With best regards,

Gabrielle Appiah Consultation Assistant

Fluid T. +44 020 7729 0770 Fluid Is the trading name of Fluid Design Ltd. Registered in England 3166163 E. [email protected] 148 Curtain Road BS EN ISO London EC2A 3AT W. www.fluidoffice.com 9001 accredited 517 letters were sent to residents of Otter Close, Icona Point, Stratford Halo, Amber Court and Carpenters Estate Neighbourhood Forum..

Invitations were also sent to the allotment holders and tenants at the Marshgate Business Centre.

COMMUNICATION COMMUNITY

YOUTH COMMUNITY COMMUNICATION

2016 FEBRUARY JULY AUGUST

STAGE 1 STAGE 2

32 Chapter 3 | Consultation process 3.2 Consultation diary

11 NOV Senior BEEs Workshop

2017 NOVEMBER DECEMBER

33 Chapter 3 | Consultation process 3.3 Communication, promotion & wayfinding

3.3 Communication, promotion & wayfinding

Stage 3 Event flyer Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park website Event flyer distribution area

Keeping in touch Letters, emails & flyers Website In early July 2016, approximately 21,000 event flyers detailing Pudding Mill has a dedicated web the Masterplan exhibition were page within the Queen Elizabeth delivered to households and Olympic Park website. It is businesses surrounding the site. regularly updated to inform people 80 ‘bundles’ were also delivered to about the project and also how local centres. In addition, flyers were to get involved. There is access to also delivered to approximately 600 information material as well as local residents. other key documents relating to the project. Workshop invitations were sent to 517 residents in surrounding Pudding Mill website residential buildings including QueenElizabethOlympicPark.co.uk/ Amber Court, Stratford Halo Tower, pudding-mill Icona Point, Otter Close and tenants of Marshgate Business Centre.

Invitations to the public exhibition were sent to the allotment plot holders.

34 Chapter 3 | Consultation process 3.3 Communication, promotion & wayfinding

Window vinyl outside the Upper Welcome Zone of the London Aquatics Centre

Wayfinding poster around the Park Cargo bike outside the venue

35 Chapter 3 | Consultation process 3.4 Activities & events

3.4 Activities & events

Exhibition Boards Introductory Flipbook Physical scale model

Main exhibition

The main exhibition was held in the Activities included: During the main exhibition, Upper Welcome Zone of the London approximately 2,700 people Aquatics Centre over a two week Cargo bike: Legacy Youth Voice attended and 64 individual feedback period. The space was shared with members were employed for forms were received UCL East & Stratford Waterfront as the duration of the exhibition to part of the Cultural and Education welcome people in from the Park. Event details District stage 3 consultation. They rode around distributing exhibition flyers which included Saturdays: 30 July (launch), 6 & 13 August, The Pudding Mill masterplan was information on Pudding Mill, and 11am – 5pm presented visitors with Cultural and presented through 6 exhibition Tuesdays: 2 & 9 August, 11am – 3pm boards accompanied by a Flipbook Educational District branded canvas and a physical scale model. bags and balloons. Wednesdays: 3 & 10 August, 1pm – 5pm Thursday: 11 August, 4pm – 8pm Pudding Mill & Cultural and Feedback forms: Visitors to the exhibition were given a feedback Education District Friday: 5 August, 4pm – 8pm form to complete and write any The public exhibition allowed comments on the proposals. This Held at the Upper Welcome Zone, London visitors to the Park, local residents feedback form was also available Aquatics Centre. and organisations to gather, meet online. the team and provide feedback on the emerging Masterplan. Quick comment sheets: In case visitors had short comments they where also given the option to complete a quick comment sheet.

Physical scale model: A model of the illustrative masterplan made reference to the proposed scale and layout of Pudding Mill in relation to the surrounding context.

36 Chapter 3 | Consultation process 3.4 Activities & events

Physiscal scale model

Exhibition Boards

Sign in and feedback forms Sing in and pick up a feedback form and post completed at the end of your visit

Entrance

Pudding Mill exhibition plan

Physical scale model and a feedback form return box Feedback form

37 Chapter 3 | Consultation process 3.4 Activities & events

Resident Group session Technical Stakeholder Briefing 2

Outreach sessions Technical stakeholders

As part of the on-going engagement Meetings and presentations Park Panel with adjacent neighbours during were arranged with the technical stage 2, workshops were organised stakeholders and Park Panel during Event details with local residents and groups to stages 1 and 2. Monday 11 July 2016, 6pm to 8pm at the ensure that a good cross-section of The meetings with the technical Podium, Queen Elizabeth Olyimpic Park. the community was involved in the stakeholders were attended by process and were able to input and statutory stakeholders (including Technical Stakeholder Briefing 2 so help shape the masterplan. Historic England, Environment Event details Workshops with the Legacy Youth Agency, TfL and Local Authorities), Voice, Senior BEEs, Manor Gardening consultants, the LLDC and PPDT. Tuesday 9 August 2016, 3pm to 5pm at the Society and the Marshgate London Aquatics Centre. The presentation to the Park Panel Businness Centre tenants will be was attended by members including held during the winter of 2016. Faringford Road Neighbourhood Resident group Watch, Manor Gardening Society, and Youth Board. Residents were identified through our stakeholder mapping and invited All meetings were held in to visit the exhibition at a dedicated conjunction with Stratford time. Waterfront and UCL East. Built Environment Access Panel The Resident Group is comprised of residents living in Pudding Mill or in Event details the surrounding area. As they will be Tuesday 14 March 2016, 11am to 2pm at most impacted by the development LLDC Offices. their views and local knowledge are critical to the success of the project. Technical Stakeholder Briefing 1

Event details Event details Friday 12 August 2016, 6pm to 7:30pm at Wednesday 23 March 2016, 2pm to 6:30pm the London Aquatics Centre. at LLDC, Stratford.

38 Chapter 3 | Consultation process 3.4 Activities & events

Introductory flipbook and physical scale model

39 Chapter 3 | Consultation process 3.5 Community involvement:

3.5 Community involvement:

Local attendance mapping p To the right is a map of known event attendees and people who have given us their feedback. This gives a broad indication of where those engaged are geographically located p in relation to the site.

It is worth noting that contact details could not always be collected during the exhibition, due to the nature p of the venue and location which attracted many people who were just visiting the Park and casually dropping into the exhibition. 110 attendee p postcodes Therefore the attendance mapping located on is not exhaustive and serves to the map (587 provide a check that there is a located off the good cross-section of involvement map) from the different neighbourhoods surrounding the site.

Demographics To ensure we are engaging with a representative cross-section of the Below are some of the key COMMUNITY DEMOGRAPHICS local community, at the exhibition observations the team kept an observational record of age groups, ethnicity • Young people under 25 were less and gender. This provides a good engaged in the general process. indication of the groups that have However there will be a workshop been engaged and allows for with Legacy Youth Voice to ensure comparison against local census data. this group is represented. Exhibition average Ward Average comparison • There has been a significant Gender under representation of BAME Male 52% 50% +2% communities. It might be beneficial to reach out to these groups in the Female 48% 50% -2% near future. Age

• People aged between 40 and 54 Under 25 23% 35% -12% were over represented in this stage of events. There will also be 25-39 29% 34% -5% additional engagement with Senior 40-54 31% 17% +14% Bees - a group of local residents for over 50's. Over 55 17% 13% +4%

Ethnicity

White 71% 46% +25%

BAME 29% 54% -25%

Notes on the demographics table above: • Categories and Ward data taken from the 2011 Census. All figures rounded to the nearest whole number, as such there may be a small discrepancy of 1%. 40 Chapter 3 | Consultation process 3.5 Community involvement:

View towards the Pudding Mill site, looking south over Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park. Exhibition average Ward Average comparison

Gender

Male 52% 50% +2%

Female 48% 50% -2%

Age

Under 25 23% 35% -12%

25-39 29% 34% -5%

40-54 31% 17% +14%

Over 55 17% 13% +4%

Ethnicity

White 71% 46% +25%

BAME 29% 54% -25%

41

PUDDING MILL

CHAPTER 4 FINDINGS

4.1 Overview

Stage 1 In addition to the information sharing that took place during Stage 1 to re-introduce the Pudding Mill masterplan to the public, key statutory stakeholders were also consulted on the project including a built environment access panel and a technical stakeholder briefing. Below is a summary of the key topics discussed.

Built Environment Access Panel (BEAP) Topics discussed in relation to Pudding Mill centred on the accesibility of the proposed masterplan designs and the provision of typologies well adapted for the needs of specific groups.

Technical Stakeholder Briefing 1 Topics discussed in relation to Pudding Mill centred on the use of the Greenway to be developed or emphasised more within the proposal.

Stage 2 Stage 2 events continued to raise project awareness, identifying key issues and challenges and gathering feedback to test, support and inform development of the masterplan.

The feedback and findings on the following pages have been gathered from feedback forms completed during the main exhibition and online feedback from online respondents. The following materials were used to collect feedback:

• Feedback forms • Comment cards In addition to this key statutory stakeholders were also consulted on the project in stage 2 including a technical stakeholder briefing and a Park Panel meeting. Below is a summary of the key topics discussed:

Technical Stakeholder Briefing 2 Topics discussed in relation to Pudding Mill included feedback about the formalised access to the Greenway, pedestrian connections and the relationship to the wider Pudding Mill site.

Park Panel Allies and Morrison provided and update on the Pudding Mill masterplan. Key areas that were discussed after the presentation included confirmation that 1,500 homes were planned for Pudding Mill, and that the quantum of affordable housing is still to be finalised. It was stated that a range of employment space would be provided. An area of concern was with regards to overshadowing of the allotments by the new development. It was confirmed that the plans are being tested for daylight and sunlighting and that there would be a follow up session with Manor Garden Society on the revised plans. 43 Chapter 4 | Findings 4.2 Comments at a glance

4.2 Comments at a glance

A selection of comments received in the feedback forms can be read here. These cover a variety of different opinions and topics and show the diversity of feedback received in this stage of the masterplanning process.

More thought and consideration for meaningful connections north & south & commitment to delivery of I have been in Stratford since this needed. Linking areas south of 2008 and have a much more Stratford High Street, through Pudding positive view than the earlier Mill & Bridgewater to UCL East and plans presented for the post- beyond. Admittedly difficult due to Olympic legacy. Fewer high rises, constraints, but current routes are more open space and better convoluted and difficult to find. access/connections. (Feedback form) (Local resident, feedback form)

A phasing plan would be welcome as it is not clear if all Marshgate Yard should only be proposed developments will three or four storeys as opposed commence at the same time. to the proposed six. Views from Four years after the games (Local resident, feedback form) second and third floor will be and some footpaths are still blocked from the Otter Close inaccessible. How can you residentail building opposite.' assure us this new development will be any different? (Local resident, feedback form) (Local resident, feedback form)

The masterplan should include more public open spaces and play provision Good mix of residential and Is there an option to have a as the area around Pudding Mill lacks small retail space to provide green park/ roof on top of the green spaces, trees, biodiversity and a vibrant new community for railway lines? plants. The balance of the suggested residents. (Local resident, feedback above should match QEOP character (Local resident, feedback form) and form. forms) (Local resident, feedback forms)

These developments will likely open up the area not to locals but to highly paid There should be more green people! spaces along the towpath; (Local resident, feedback (Local Resident, feedback form) form)

KEY

Support & Requests

Suggestions

Challenges

44 Chapter 4 | Findings 4.2 Comments at a glance

Beautiful aestherics especially mews and terraces but more There needs to be space for local green and please make prices Connecting the greenway (sewer businesses not just large businesses. accesible to young buyers as bank) in a logical manner for Would be good to see shorthold otherwise we all know what cyclists is vital. This is NOT clear in tenancies (12 months) to encourage will happen.... the masterplan small business/start ups. (Local resident, feedback (Local resident, feedback form) (Local resident, feedback form) form)

Excited to get more retail units near where we live and Liking the use of bricks; gives a increased housing more urban/authentic feel which Some of the language in (Local resident, feedback should also have a nice ‘patina’ over the exhibition is jargon e.g. forms ) time (as opposed to metal, plastic-y typologies - what is that? look of most high rise buildings). Varying building heights are great. (Local resident, feedback form) (Local resident, feedback form)

The allotments, if unaffected by development work well and provide community access and visible green It looks like orientated to young space. Plans look as though the area will be vibrant and people I haven’t seen any info about (Local resident, feedback form) interesting. a primary or high school needs (Local resident, feedback (Local resident, feedback form) form)

Lots of great public realm opportunities and As a photographer I would like an exciting new a workspace in this area - studio hub for london with other creatives. Only two residents from Otter Close are (Visitor, feedback here as people are on holiday. We need (Local resident,, feedback form) form) another session. Seagulls are common now and territorial around PM. I have seen them trying to attack a heron on City Mill River. Seagulls like sitting and nesting on flat roofs and ventilation on rooftops. This should be taken into account for the building of Marshgate Yard. (Local resident, feedback form)

45 Chapter 4 | Findings 4.3 Events feedback

4.3 Events feedback

The diagrams reflect findings from the tick box questions on the feedback forms. In total,64 feedback forms were completed and 200 comments recorded. The responses have been categorised into those received either from the general public or from local residents to try and ensure local issues are acknowledged and responded to.

A tick box on the feedback form allowed people to identify whether they were local to the area.

Are you...

41% 31% 20% 8%

A local resident A visitor Unknown Member of an organisation

E18 | 4% E17 | 4%

E13 | 4%

E11 | 4%

E9 | 4% Local Residents... Of the 27 respondents who identify

E15 | 45% themselves as local residents: E3 | 12% • 20 are from the following postcodes: E3, E9, E11, E13, E15, E17, E18. • 2 are from SE18 and N19 • 5 are unknown

UNKNOWN OR OTHER | 23 %

*based on 64 feedback forms completed and 200 comments received.

46 Chapter 4 | Findings 4.3 Events feedback

Q01: What is your overall impression of the proposals for Pudding Mill?

19 comments 28 comments received received

GENERAL PUBLIC LOCAL RESIDENTS

26% 20%

EXCITED

53% 54%

GENERALLY POSITIVE

5% 10%

NEUTRAL

2% 9%

UNSURE

0% 4%

UNEXCITED

13% 4%

NO ANSWER

*based on 64 feedback forms completed and 200 comments received. Analysis: The overall written feedback responding to this Local residents suggested more green spaces, using question was positive amongst both the general public the the towpath along the waterways as a public and local residents. This reflects the tick-box feedback green space and noted the importance of it being received in which 79% of the general public and 74% open to the public. They also expressed being pleased of local residents were excited or positive about the that the allotments are remaining on the site. Other plans. Comments from both groups highlighted their suggestions included a community space and youth support for the dynamism and vitality that will be centre. Local residents however voiced concerns over brought into the area in the form of the Local Centre the number of developments in the surrounding area and retail and residential mix. In addition, comments and have requested a detailed phasing plan. from the general public were positive about the area Local residents also voiced concerns about the loss of being put back into use and local residents comments sunlight for the allotments and existing residences; showed support for the mix of housing typologies. as well as aprehension about the amount and affordability of ‘affordable housing’. They suggested more affordable housing should be provided.

47 Chapter 4 | Findings 4.3 Events feedback

Q02: Do you support the aspiration to provide additional housing at Pudding Mill to meet local needs?

GENERAL PUBLIC LOCAL RESIDENTS

79% 88%

YES

5% 4%

DON’T KNOW

3% 4%

NO

13% 4%

NO ANSWER

*based on 64 feedback forms completed and 200 comments received. Analysis: The aspiration to provide additional housing at about the type and quantity of affordable housing. Pudding Mill received high levels of support within There were concerns about the area attracting foreign both local residents (88%) and the general public investment and gentrification. (79%). Responses identify the area as being under utilised and a demand in the area for new housing. Though there were high levels of support, both local residents and the general public expressed concerns

48 Chapter 4 | Findings 4.3 Events feedback

Q03: Do you support our view for the new Local Centre at Pudding Mill providing flexible employment and retail floorspace, as well as new community facilities? What type of facilities would you like to see provided? Do you think the mix of residential and employment being proposed is appropriate?

39 comments 37 comments received received

GENERAL PUBLIC LOCAL RESIDENTS

66% 77%

YES

16% 15%

DON’T KNOW

0% 4%

NO

18% 4%

NO ANSWER

*based on 64 feedback forms completed and 200 comments received. Analysis: Overall tick-box responses to this question were In addition local residents would also like to see supportive of the Local Centre and the provision of opportunities for artists live work studio spaces. More both employment and retail floorspace with 66% of information on the quality of employment, residential the general public and 77% of local residents selecting and retail spaces within the Local Centre would be ‘Yes’ in answer to the question. helpful. The general public echoed these concerns and expressed difficulty in understanding the type of However, in the written feedback, local residents employment and retail being proposed. queried the kind of employment and retail to be provided and suggested that housing seems to be Both local residents and the general public voiced of more importance than employment. In relation to their desires to see more social infrastructure food, drink and retail they noted their preference for provided within the Local Centre, specifically health independent retail rather than well known chains. and education facilities.

49 Chapter 4 | Findings 4.3 Events feedback

Q04: How well do you think the masterplan connects to the wider area through pedestrian, cycling and public transport routes? Are there any missed opportunities, and/or do you have any suggestions?

10 comments 11 comments received received

GENERAL PUBLIC LOCAL RESIDENTS

5% 4%

TOO MANY CONNECTIONS

45% 46%

JUST ENOUGH CONNECTIONS

13% 23%

DON’T KNOW

18% 27%

NOT ENOUGH CONNECTIONS

18% 0%

NO ANSWER

*based on 64 feedback forms completed and 200 comments received. Analysis: Residents asked for better connections to the Within the 45% of the general public and 46% of the surrounding areas like Stratford Hight Street and the local residents who selected ‘just enough connections’ Park. Respondents also highlighted the lack of bicycle some expressed concerns over a lack of clarity stations on the Greenway as a missed opportunity. within the masterplan in relation to wayfinding Local residents agreed with using the waterways and and connections to the surrounding areas within adjacent towpaths for connectivity. the written feedback. In addition both groups also specified that better wayfinding was needed under The general public echoed these concerns and the railway lines and across and along rivers. More suggestions: connectivity between the Park and detail on the future paths and road links to Pudding Stratford High Street is vital for Pudding Mill to be Mill Lane DLR station and Stratford High Street and a succesful neighbourhood, as current routes are the Park is needed. convoluted and difficult to find.

50 Chapter 4 | Findings 4.3 Events feedback

Q05: How well do you think the masterplan provides a good range of public spaces, including play provision, for use by future users, visitors and surrounding communities? What works well? What else could be provided for?

7 comments 9 comments received received

GENERAL PUBLIC LOCAL RESIDENTS

31% 12%

VERY WELL

37% 53%

WELL

8% 19%

DON’T KNOW

3% 12%

POORLY

0% 0%

NOT AT ALL

21% 4%

NO ANSWER

*based on 64 feedback forms completed and 200 comments received. Analysis: Overall tick-box responses were generally positive there was a suggestion to use the allotments as a with 68% of the general public and 65% of local public green space. The waterways and towpath residents selecting ‘well’ or ‘very well’ however the were also mentioned as potential green open public comments received in written feedback were mixed. spaces. Local residents however noted a lack of green spaces and trees in Pudding Mill and stated that the Comments from the general public were positive masterplan doesn’t clearly demonstrate the quality of whilst comments from local residents highlighted the green space and play provision. concerns: The general public complimented the masterplan on the wide range and quantity of open More detailed information of the public open spaces spaces proposed, but the lack of a large open space and play provisions should be provided in order to for people to congregate was pointed out. In addition, allow for more informative feedback from consultees.

51 Chapter 4 | Findings 4.3 Events feedback

Q06: Do you agree with the approach to character and form? Tell us more...

2 comments 11 comments received received

GENERAL PUBLIC LOCAL RESIDENTS

13% 12%

STRONGLY AGREE

42% 38%

AGREE

8% 27%

DON’T KNOW

0% 8%

DISAGREE

8% 4%

STRONGLY DISAGREE

29% 11%

NO ANSWER

*based on 64 feedback forms completed and 200 comments received.

Analysis: Overall tick-box feedback has been generally positive However concern was raised specifically by residents with 55% of the general public and 50% of local adjoining Pudding Mill and allotment plot holders on residents stating that they either ‘strongly agree’ or the adverse impact the proposed tall buildings would ‘agree’ with the approach to character and form. have on sunlight and existing views. Those who responded positively also supported the massing strategy and thought the scale was appropriate for the area. They also responded positively to the mix of building typologies.

52 Chapter 4 | Findings 4.3 Events feedback

Q07: Do you ever use Pudding Mill at present?

GENERAL PUBLIC LOCAL RESIDENTS

26% 38%

YES

53% 58%

NO

21% 4%

NO ANSWER

*based on 64 feedback forms completed and 200 comments received.

Q07a: If so why?

GENERAL PUBLIC LOCAL RESIDENTS

27% 50%

DLR STATION

27% 31%

ACCESS TO PARK

36% 7%

ALLOTMENTS

3% 12%

OTHER

*based on 64 feedback forms completed and 200 comments received.

53 Chapter 4 | Findings 4.3 Events feedback

Q07b: If not, will the proposals presented here today encourage you to do so?

GENERAL PUBLIC LOCAL RESIDENTS

53% 38%

YES

14% 8%

DON’T KNOW

6% 17%

NO

28% 37%

NO ANSWER

*based on 64 feedback forms completed and 200 comments received.

Analysis: 53% of the general public and 58% of local residents Results from members of the general public present noted that they do not use Pudding Mill at present. a more even split of uses with equal proportion of people using the area to access the DLR station and to The local residents that use the area mainly do so to access the Park (both with 27%). Just over a third of use the DLR station (53%) and to a lesser extent to respondents from the general public use Pudding Mill access the Park (31%). Only 7% of local residents use to access the allotments (36%). Pudding Mill to access the allotments. In addition, 53% of the general public and 38% of local residents who do not use Pudding Mill at present are encouraged to do so after viewing the proposals.

54 Chapter 4 | Findings 4.3 Events feedback

Q08: Have you found this event informative?

GENERAL PUBLIC LOCAL RESIDENTS

74% 77%

YES

5% 8%

DON’T KNOW

5% 4%

NO

16% 11v%

NO ANSWER

*based on 64 feedback forms completed and 200 comments received.

Q09: Do you have any further comments? Are there any missed opportunities, and/or do you have any suggestions?

17 comments 10 comments received received

GENERAL PUBLIC LOCAL RESIDENTS Analysis: There was a strong level of support throughout Members of the general public complimented the the consultation process for the masterplan. Local exhibition and the high level of engagement but also residents agreed with the need to organise further pointed out the use of jargon on the exhibition boards. meetings with residents and other local community groups. In addition some local residents have also suggested an increase of affordable housing to at least 50%. An impact study has been requested by adjoining residents and allotment plot holders to assess any loss of daylight and impact on views.

55 Chapter 4 | Findings 4.3 Events feedback

Your thoughts The topics on this page were sourced from comments received through feedback forms. Answers to questions from the feedback forms and comments have been categorised into the key themes and sub-themes in the diagram on the next page. These topics have then been organised into three categories and sub-categories:

• Form & identity

• Access and inclusion

• General or other

Public exhibition - London Aquatics Centre

56 Chapter 4 | Findings 4.3 Events feedback

Topics most discussed Number of comments

Buildings scale 7 21 Employement and residential mix 6 21 Ambition and vision 2 11 41% Housing offer and rent 2 8 Residential ownership FORM & 8 Architecture and planning IDENTITY 4 Buildings aesthetics 4 Response to context 3 Urban greenery 3

Linkages 20 18 Green open spaces 12 Retail 8 11 Community involvement 6 9 Indoor leisure facilities 5 7 Health facilities 5 7 Outdoor leisure facilities 5 7 48% Education Facilities 5 6 ACCESS & Food & drink 5 6 INCLUSION Cycling Infrastructure 3 Communal indoor spaces 2 Landscape and public spaces 2 Communal outdoors spaces 1 Food growing 1 Pedestrian friendly places 1 Parking 1 Public transport 1

Exhibition feedback 8 Types of employment 6 Masterplaning process/timescale 4 13% Culture 2 GENERAL Temporary uses 2 OR OTHER Public art 1 Sustainability 1

57

PUDDING MILL

CHAPTER 5 TRACKING CHANGES & NEXT STEPS

5.1 Tracking Changes

Over the course of the consultation the project team will listen to and wherever possible respond to the views of local communities and groups, alongside those of key stakeholders and statutory consultees.

The second stage of consultation has provided valuable insight into the key issues and aspirations, and has gathered responses to the emerging masterplan concepts and proposals from local groups and the community. Comments received are now being reviewed by the design team who will then:

• develop a phasing plan • develop a connectivity plan • carry-out a sunlight/daylight study • provide further details open space/landscaping • provide further details on typologies and mix of tenure

5.2 Next Steps

This report provides a summary of findings and community involvement from the second stage of consultation.

The findings are now being used by LLDC to help inform its plans.

For more information as the project progresses, visit: www.QueenElizabethOlympicPark.co.uk/pudding-mill

59

PUDDING MILL

APPENDICES

A. Publicity & communications B. Stakeholder mapping C. Main exhibition materials D. Pop up materials E. Feedback form

61 Chapter 5 | Appendices A. Publicity & communications

A. Publicity & communications

A1. Consultation events flyer — July 2016

Side A

Side B

62 Chapter 5 | Appendices A. Publicity & communications

A2. Consultation events flyer - distribution boundary

Pudding Mill site

Distribution boundary

63 Chapter 5 | Appendices A. Publicity & communications

A3. Websites

Pudding Mill website http://queenelizabetholympicpark.co.uk/pudding-mill

64 Chapter 5 | Appendices A. Publicity & communications

A4. Exhibition board - Febuary 2016

PUDDING MILL FEBRUARY 2016

Site context As there have been changes to plans The Legacy Corporation is aiming to create elsewhere on the Park, particularly with a strong and unified neighbourhood centre, The site Olympicopolis, we are re-visiting the Pudding as supported by the Local Plan, within Pudding Mill is located to the south of Queen Elizabeth Mill masterplan to make sure it fits with the Pudding Mill which maximises residential Olympic Park (the Park) and is bounded on two sides new developments and contributes fully capacity and contributes towards meeting by the Waterworks River to the northeast and Bow towards meeting local housing needs. the Legacy Corporation’s key priorities Back River to the southeast. To the southwest it is around local economic benefit, equality and contained by Cooks Road, which is owned by third inclusion, sustainability and community parties, and adjoins existing allotments and the Great Eastern Railway corridor to the northeast. engagement. Connections Bow Back River The ‘Greenway’, a strategic pedestrian and cycle route, bisects Pudding Mill and provides an important link between Stratford and Hackney, as well as routes into the Park. The City Mill River also runs through Pudding Mill, crossing beneath the Great Eastern Railway corridor at its junction with the Greenway. A cluster of residential buildings occupy a triangular piece of land between the City Mill River and Greenway, whilst a number of high rise residential towers are located to the south of the Bow Back River along Stratford High Street.

Character Marshgate Lane The site itself is characterised by various site compounds and industrial warehouses, as well as the Hackney Wick Bow Electricity Substation and associated utilities infrastructure which criss-cross the site. Pudding Mill Stratford DLR station is located at the junction of Marshgate Lane and Barbers Road and acts as a new gateway to Bow East the site.

Surrounding context The surrounding context of Pudding Mill, which is subject to rapid change, is defined largely by the Park to the north, Warton Road and the Carpenters Estate to the east, and Stratford High Street plus the associated development at Strand East to the south. Pudding Mill Bromley-by Bow Olympicopolis

Proposed Residential Development

Surrounding development

Background The Legacy Communities Scheme planning application, which was approved in September 2012, proposed a range of employment and residential uses at Pudding Mill, as well as other supporting social infrastructure and open space. In total the scheme allowed for up to 118,290sqm Gross External Area (GEA) of residential uses and 35,949sqm GEA of employment uses.

Bow Electricity Substation Pudding Mill DLR Station View from the DLR Waterworks River

65 Chapter 5 | Appendices A. Publicity & communications

66 Chapter 5 | Appendices B.Stakeholder mapping

B. Stakeholder mapping Please see the mapping below, from the wider area who have a showing local groups and particular interest, wide remit or We are continually working to make organisations who may be to ensure that groups based on sure those who have an active interested. This is not an exhaustive the outskirts of this area can be interest in, or are impacted by list, but aims to show a good cross- involved. The mapping is always Pudding Mill are kept informed and section of local groups within being updated, please let us know involved. There are currently over approximately one mile of the UCL if there are any groups you believe 700 project contacts who we will East site. This boundary is flexible should be considered. continue to engage with throughout and we will also be involving groups the process.

S5 APPROX. 20 MINU TES W ALK FR OM CE M14 NT RE H12 M36 M32 J3 A8 G3 M35 B1 M13 M34 K3 A6 M12 J2 A7 WICK K4 STRATFORD NEW TOWN K5 S9 M8 G2 A2 M31 M37 D1 M5 S3 M18 M2 T2 M16 C2 C1 B2 M6 R2 F4 M33 H16 H14 H6 C6 P3 K1 Q2 M30 H5 H10 J4 M19 K9 H7 G1 H13 R1 H11 M1 M29 H17 F3 H8 T3 D3 D5 F1 M20 C3 B7 L1 M28 A15 D2 A16 H15 BOW EAST S1 M15 C5 N1 E1 S7 A9 T1 M3 S4 A15 H1 A1 M17 M21 Q3 D4 M7 M27 S8 N2 S2

F2 A3 Q1 M4 K6 A11 C4 H3 A10 P2 H18 K7

P1 M24 M11 M9 B3 A13 M25 M22 A12 A4 M26 A5 K2 B5 K8 M23 H4 S6 M10 A14 E2 B4 H9

BROMLEY-BY-BOW KEY

PUDDING MILL B6 H2 J1 GUIDE BOUNDARY FOR IDENTIFYING STAKEHOLDER GROUPS

67 PUDDING MILL Chapter 5 | Appendices STAGES 1+2 CONSULTATION REPORT B.Stakeholder mapping

STAKEHOLDER GROUPS

A EDUCATION - PRIMARY E EDUCATION - SPECIAL SCHOOL J LOCAL COMMUNITY GROUPS / INTEREST GROUPS A1 Carpenters Primary School E1 John F. Kennedy School # A2 Gainsborough Community E2 The Cherry Trees School J1 Community Links, Newham Primary School J2 Aston Mansfield A3 Old Ford Primary School F YOUNG PEOPLE J3 Chandos Community Group (& Hub) J4 A4 St Agnes Catholic School F1 Discover Children’s Museum & Story African Caribbean Voices Association A5 Old Palace Primary School Centre*# Newham New Deal Partnership A6 Colegrave Primary School F2 Eastside Youth Centre Newham Community Team - Stratford and West Ham A7 St Francis R C Primary School F3 Carpenters & Dockland Centre Hackney Wick and Fish Island A8 Maryland Primary School F4 Newham Education Business Partnership Cultural Interest Group (CIG) A9 West Ham Church of England DiVA* Together! 2012 CIC* Primary School Circle in Hackney A10 Renelagh Primary School Park Champions A11 Manor Primary School Inland Waterways Association A12 Malmesbury Primary School G LIFE LONG LEARNING AND ELDERS Manor Garden Society A13 Phoenix Primary School London Cycling Campaign G1 50 Plus St John’s A14 Wellington Primary School Bow Bengali Forum G2 Trowbridge senior citizens club A15 Legatum School# A16 G3 Hibiscus Caribbean School 21 (Primary) Elderly Association K LOCAL COMMUNITY Age UK East London B EDUCATION - SECONDARY FACILITIES / CENTRES B1 Chobham Academy# K1 Stratford Library # B2 Sarah Bonnell School H CIVIC / ARTS / CULTURE K2 Bromley by Bow Centre B3 Phoenix Secondary School K3 Sir Ludwig Guttmann Health And H1 Stratford Rising (inc. Stratford Cultural Wellbeing Centre B4 Ian Mikardo High School Forum)# K4 Timber Lodge B5 East London Science School H2 Fundamental Architecture Inclusion* K5 Cre8 Lifestyle Centre B6 St Paul’s Way School H3 Assemble (Sugarhouse Studios)* K6 Eastside Youth and Community Centre B7 School 21 (Secondary) H4 3 Mills Studios # K7 Tredegar Community Centre Hackney Community College H5 Stratford Picturehouse* K8 Kingsley Hall Community Centre H6 Stratford Circus*# EDUCATION - FURTHER # K9 Hub 67 C H7 Theatre Royal Stratford East* & HIGHER EDUCATION Stratford and West Ham Community Hub H8 Iroko Theatre Company # # Spotlight Centre C1 University Square Stratford H9 Rosetta Art Centre* # Poplar HARCA (Birkbeck & UEL Partnership)* H10 East London Dance*# # C2 University of East London Stratford* H11 APE Media* C3 Building Crafts College H12 Maryland Studioz* L SAFETY C4 Alpha Building Services, H13 Actorshop* Engineering Training H14 White building (SPACE Studios)# L1 Faringford Road Neighbourhood C5 Williams College, Private H15 London Centre for Book Arts# Watch C6 Newtec Training Centres H16 The Yard Theatre# LLDC Park Police Newham Collegiate Sixth Form Centre H17 Stour Space# Newham Safer Neighbourhoods New Vic College H18 Urban Development Team Newham College of Further Education Hackney Wicked Festival# Ward Panel CREATE# D EDUCATION - NURSERY Whitechapel Gallery# D1 The Alphabet House Nursery School The New Black Film Collective (TNBFC)* D2 Little Rainbow Nursery D3 Newtec Nurseries (five nurseries in various location) D4 Rebecca Cheetham Nursery Education Centre D5 Montessori on the Park, Early Year’s Education

68 Chapter 5 | Appendices B.Stakeholder mapping

M FAITH GROUPS N LOCAL BUSINESS AND T HOUSING ASSOCIATIONS ENTERPRISE GROUPS AND STUDENT ACCOMMODATION M1 St John’s Parish Church* # M2 Radha Krishna Temple N1 Stratford Renaissance Partnership* T1 Mansion View M3 West Ham Parish Church N2 The View Tube T2 Unite Stratford One M4 Church of Christ Stratford Market Traders Association T3 East Thames Group* M5 St Mary of Eaton Church Thames Gateway Technology Centre Genesis Housing M6 The Celestial Church of Christ Newham Chamber of Commerce Family Mosaic M7 Old Ford Methodist Church Newham Council Hackney Homes M8 St Paul’s Church Micro-enterprise Project Stratford BID M9 Gurdwara Sikh Sangat EXISTING PANELS AND NETWORKS M10 Methodist Church of Tower Hamlets Stratford Business Network Infrastructure M11 Masjid e Ilyas East London Small Business Centre BEAP # M12 Al-hudaa Islamic Prayer Group UK East London Business Alliance Legacy Youth Voice and Youth Board M13 Alhudaa Mosque Park Panel Cultural and Education District M14 Madrasah Al-Tawhid SOCIAL ENTERPRISES / START-UP P Stakeholder Group M15 Bryant Street Methodist Church / CO-WORKING / AFFORDABLE Creating Connections East M16 The Redeemed Christian Church of God P1 Bow Arts Trust*# Stratford Rising M17 Salvation Army Church P2 Yardhouse at Sugarhouse Studios Hackney Wick and Fish Island M18 Hope and Grace Romanian Church P3 Echo Cultural Interest Group (CIG) M19 Highway Church M20 Brickfields United Reformed Church M21 West Ham Baptist Tabernacle Q BUSINESS PARKS UCL M22 London Markaz Q1 Marshgate Business Centre Student Community M23 Bromley By Bow URC Church Q2 Stratford Office Village Students Union M24 Bow Baptist Church Academic Staff Q3 Burford Road Business Centre M25 St. Mary-atte-Bow Professional Services M26 Our Lady & St Catherine of Siena Church R RETAIL M27 New Bethel Revival Ministry Church M28 Christian Life City at The iCAN Studios R1 Stratford Shopping Centre M29 Saint Mark’s Gate R2 Westfield Shopping Centre M30 Royal Connections Retail business along Stratford M31 Calvary Church of God in Christ High Street Hackney Wick Other retail M32 Major Road Baptist Church M33 Saint Matthew, West Ham S LOCAL TENANTS’ AND M34 Stratford Spiritual Church RESIDENTS’ ASSOCIATIONS M35 St James Church M36 Stratford Seventh-Day Adventist Church S1 Carpenters TMO Board M37 Homerton Baptist Church S2 Stratford Halo Ramgarhia Sikh Gurdwara Temple S3 Leebank Square RA SKS Swaminarayan Temple East S4 Wick Lane London S5 Kingsmead Estate (Hackney Wick) Gujarat Hidu Welfare Association S6 Tredegar Estate Hackney and East London Synagogue S7 Icona Point residents Yavnah Synagogue S8 Association of Ironworks residents S9 East Village Residents Association

KEY

Located off the map * Stratford Rising Member Overarching group / multiple locations # Cultural and Education District Stakeholder Group

69 Chapter 5 | Appendices C. Main exhibition materials

C. Main exhibition materials

C1. Exhibition board 1 (A1)

70 Chapter 5 | Appendices C. Main exhibition materials

C1. Exhibition board 2 (A1)

71 Chapter 5 | Appendices C. Main exhibition materials

C1. Exhibition board 3 (A0)

PUDDING MILL Summer 2016 3. EMERGING ILLUSTRATIVE MASTERPLAN

The Pudding Mill masterplan seeks to stitch a new residential neighbourhood and Local Centre back into the surrounding communities, improving connections to Strand East, Stratford High Street and the Park, as well as developments along the Bow Back 12 River.

The key components of the emerging masterplan are outlined below:

Local Centre • Providing a focus for employment and retail provision and a WARTON ROAD hub of activity at the heart of Pudding Mill, adjacent to the DLR   Station    9    Employment Provision     • Approximately 36,000sqm of ‰ exible employment ‰ oospace for a  range of end users, consolidated within the new Local Centre 1  • Ancillary ground ‰ oor employment ‰ oospace along Barbers Road and Marshgate Lane WATERWORKS RIVER Retail • Approximately 2,500sqm of retail ‰ oorspace lining Marshgate Lane and Pudding Mill Square, catering for the needs of the new residential community and adjoining developments such as UCL East

Community/Leisure Facilities • Ancillary leisure and social infrastructure, which could include a BRIDGEWATER crèche, walk in GP or a gym SQUARE

Public Open Space and Play Space • A network of public open spaces, catering for a range of users, 2 connected by a series of shared surfaces • Play provision for all ages that reinforces the character of GREENWAY Pudding Mill as a residential neighbourhood

Improved Connectivity CITY MILL RIVER • An active high street along Marshgate Lane that connects Stratford High Street with the new UCL East campus and the Park beyond

• A cycle and pedestrian route along Pudding Mill Lane, providing 11        access to the DLR station, and extending in to the Park through a  13         viaduct archway     • A new East-West Street providing a shared space to integrate 4   9

 adjoining developments with the Local Centre, and creating a new      internal route through the scheme  • Improved connections to the Greenway and river edges, as well    as reinstating or providing additional pedestrian and cycle links    to the Park                Housing   STRATFORD HIGH STREET • High density residential development that contributes towards 5 meeting local housing need • Provision of varied housing typologies   • 40-bed (minimum) sheltered housing accommodation     PUDDING MILL LANE  7    

Existing 10 Bow Back Square EAST š WEST STREET 3 14 New 11 Railway 6 8 1 Allotments 12 UCL East       Bridgewater Square and     2 13   Marshgate Yard      connection to Greenway       9 BOW BACK RIVER  3 Stratford High Street 14 Bow Substation 

           4 Station Square   The Greenway      10   5 Pudding Mill Square Local Centre

6 East - West Street Improved  Connectivity 7 Residential blocks Pedestrian &        Cycle route 8 Mews                Pudding Mill       9 Towpath     Lane Station         

72 Chapter 5 | Appendices C. Main exhibition materials

C1. Exhibition board 4 (A1)

73 Chapter 5 | Appendices C. Main exhibition materials

C1. Exhibition board 5 (A1)

74 Chapter 5 | Appendices C. Main exhibition materials

C1. Exhibition board 6 (A1)

75 Chapter 5 | Appendices C. Main exhibition materials

C2. Cultural and Education District exhibition board (A0)

76 Chapter 5 | Appendices C. Main exhibition materials

C3. Introductory flipbook (A3 - content overleaf

The introductory flip-book has been used at all events and is also available as an online resource.

77 Chapter 5 | Appendices C. Main exhibition materials

Introductory Flip-Book | Summer 2016 Pudding Mill Introductory Flip-Book | Summer 2016 Pudding Mill

PUDDING MILL INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND - LEGACY COMMUNITIES INTRODUCTORY The Legacy Corporation is SCHEME FLIP-BOOK revisiting the Pudding Mill Pudding Mill masterplan in response to the The Legacy Communities Summer 2016 changing context of adjoining Scheme (LCS) planning developments, including the application, which was approved Cultural and Education District. in September 2012, proposed a range of employment and London Stadium The Legacy Corporation wants London Aquatics Centre residential uses at Pudding Mill, to create a vibrant Local Centre as well as other supporting at the heart of Pudding Mill, as social infrastructure and open supported by the Local Plan, space. which maximises residential capacity and employment In total the scheme allowed opportunities, as well as meeting for around 1,300 homes, key priorities around local plus a range of employment economic benefit, equality and floorspace, retail units and inclusion, sustainability and community facilities. community engagement.

Illustrative Masterplan Produced for LCS (2012)

4 5 Pudding Mill Square

Introductory Flip-Book | Summer 2016 Pudding Mill Introductory Flip-Book | Summer 2016 Pudding Mill Introductory Flip-Book | Summer 2016 Pudding Mill

WHAT IS A SITE CONTEXT MASTERPLAN

A masterplan usually consists of The outline planning application Pudding Mill sits between a series of two dimensional plans will seek to deliver the following Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park In Links folder do and three dimensional images for Pudding Mill: to the North and Stratford High and text describing how an area Street to the South. Both of again to change name will be developed. which are undergoing a rapid EMPLOYMENT COMMUNITY FACILITIES period of change. The outline planning application Approximately 36,000 sqm of flexible Up to 13,142 sqm of community employment space that can either facilities Pudding Mill is bounded on will set out the vision for the site be used by a single tenant or by two sides by the Waterworks as well as details of access, scale, tenants, either taking entire floors or OPEN SPACE River to the northeast and Bow character, use and urban design; subdivided sections. Approximately 16,000 sqm of open Back River to the southeast. To it provides a foundation from space to compliment the wider the southwest it is contained which future Reserved Matters RESIDENTIAL provision within Queen Elizabeth by Cooks Road, and adjoins Applications can be prepared. Approximately 1,500 residential homes Olympic Park. The masterplan will of which 40 will be assisted living also include play space and cater for existing allotments and the homes. all ages. Great Eastern Railway corridor to the northeast. RETAIL AND LEISURE FACILITIES Approximately 2,500 sqm of retail The City Mill River also runs space and leisure facilities through Pudding Mill, crossing beneath the Great Eastern Railway corridor at its junction with the Greenway.

10 11 12

Pudding Mill Introductory Flip-Book | Summer 2016 Pudding Mill Introductory Flip-Book | Summer 2016 Pudding Mill Introductory Flip-Book | Summer 2016

OPPORTUNITIES CONSTRAINTS

CHARACTER AREAS CONNECTIVITY RAILWAY VIADUCT The natural division of the site allows At present Pudding Mill is somewhat The Great Eastern Railway/Crossrail/DLR for the creation of two distinct, yet isolated, being bounded by various viaduct bounds Pudding Mill to the north. interconnected neighbourhoods: barriers to pedestrian or vehicular Whilst the station itself will offer a degree a vibrant urban neighbourhood movement. The masterplan will explore of active frontage, the viaduct west of the at Pudding Mill defined by the opportunities to promote new or station is comprised of a blank concrete Local Centre and a more domestic improved connections to the Park and wall. and relaxed neighbourhood at Stratford High Street, as well as Warton Bridgewater.. Road. The masterplan will consider the To the east of the station, the Marshgate Pudding Mill Bridgwater hierarchy of these connections and how Lane underpass separates vehicular and TRANSPORT CONNECTIONS they should be linked to new internal pedestrian routes by way of a significant The Pudding Mill DLR Station, re- routes across Pudding Mill. drop in level. opened in 2014, provides direct access to Stratford Station in WATERWAYS just 2 minutes, which acts as an Pudding Mill benefits from a variety of UNDERGROUND UTILITIES interchange for various onward waterside with rivers surrounding it on A number of underground constraints connections across London. three sides. The masterplan will provide such as Power Lines Underground (PLUG), appropriate responses to this special HV cables and their easements as well as setting by taking into account strategic utilities within existing roads impact the views and pedestrian movement patterns, development of the site. as well as townscape considerations.

18 16 17

Pudding Mill Introductory Flip-Book | Summer 2016 Pudding Mill Introductory Flip-Book | Summer 2016 Pudding Mill Introductory Flip-Book | Summer 2016

ILLUSTRATIVE VISUALISATIONS A VIBRANT LOCAL CENTRE

WARTON ROAD

WATERWORKS RIVER KEY FEATURES

BRIDGEWATER • Creation of a new square adjacent to Pudding • Some community facilities will also be located GREEN Mill DLR comprising soft and hard landscaping in the Local Centre around neighbourhood open elements will be a significant point of arrival spaces and the East-West Street CITY MILL RIVER linking the heart of the new development to the PUDDING • Frontages will have active ground floor uses to MILL DLR station and the wider area SQUARE

help encourage movement towards Marshgate PUDDING MILL LANE

MARSHGATE • Creation of new employment spaces around Lane LANE SQUARE Pudding Mill Lane DLR Station will add vibrancy STRATFORD HIGH STREET and vitality within the Local Centre and support BOW BACK RIVER

BOW Marshgate Lane as a new local high street BACK SQUARE • Retail and leisure uses will be located principally Pudding Mill Square Marshgate Lane Yard around the station

   

                                  Ground Floor Use Plan  

26 24 25

78 Chapter 5 | Appendices C. Main exhibition materials

Introductory Flip-Book | Summer 2016 Pudding Mill Introductory Flip-Book | Summer 2016 Pudding Mill Introductory Flip-Book | Summer 2016 Pudding Mill

BRIEF AND VISION WHO’S INVOLVED FOR PUDDING MILL

The Pudding Mill masterplan The new development will The neighbourhood will include: LONDON LEGACY DEVELOPMENT aims to create a new residential seek to improve pedestrian CORPORATION (LLDC) neighbourhood with a vibrant and cycle connections through • New homes, including Landowner & Developer Local Centre, providing a range the site and maximise on the sheltered accommodation of housing typologies to meet opportunities presented by its • Flexible employment space ALLIES & MORRISON local need, as well as flexible proximity to the Pudding Mill Masterplanners employment floorspace, retail Lane DLR station and Stratford • Retail units units and community facilities; High Street, as well as Queen • Social infrastructure BRADLEY-HOLE SCHOENAICH all tied together through a high Elizabeth Olympic Park. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS (BHSLA) • Play space quality public realm. Landscape Architect • Leisure space AECOM Planning Agent & Environmental Consultant

FLUID Community Consultation

6 8 9

Introductory Flip-Book | Summer 2016 Pudding Mill Introductory Flip-Book | Summer 2016 Pudding Mill Introductory Flip-Book | Summer 2016 Pudding Mill

19 COOKS ROAD 1 EAST WICK 12 CHOBHAM ACADEMY 6 BOBBY MOORE ACADEMY SURROUNDING CONTEXT CHARACTER WIDER MAJOR Summary: Up to 870 new homes, new Summary: A new school for 3-18 year Summary: Up to 543 residential units, primary school and two new nurseries Summary: A sports specialist secondary school olds that opened in September 2014. In approx. 58,000 sq ft of commercial and primary school with a 6th form across two addition to 100 children in the nursery, floorspace and open spaces and The surrounding context of Pudding The site itself was formerly industrial Status: Zonal masterplan approved sites. when the Academy is at full capacity it landscaping December 2015, Phase 1 detailed design in will have 600 students in the primary planning process Status: Planning applications granted Status: The application for the southern DEVELOPMENTS school, a further 900 students in the block has been approved. Mill, which is subject to rapid change, land and is characterised by various Developer: London Legacy Development Proposed operator: David Ross secondary school and a Sixth Form for Corporation, East Wick and Sweetwater Education Trust 420. Developer: BellwayPartnership Projects Ltd is defined largely by the Park to the site compounds, as well as the Bow Status: Now open 7 PUDDING MILL 2 Developer: A Lend Lease Harris 12 Summary: A residential neighbourhood that Partnership north, Warton Road and the Carpenters Electricity Substation and associated SWEETWATER will deliver up to 1,300 homes, employment Summary: Up to 650 new homes floorspace, retail units, community facilities, 20 MARSHGATE 10 including apartments and family homes. and a wide range of public open spaces. 13 CHOBHAM FARM Summary: 8 new buildings containing Estate to the east, and Stratford High utilities infrastructure that criss-cross 9 A new primary school, two new nurseries, Status: Outline planning permission Summary: A new family neighbourhood community space, a library and health delivering around 1000 homes (of which approx. 45,000 sq ft of business WICK STRATFORD granted with amendments currently being floorspace, 254 new homes and open centre considered by LLDC over 40% are family homes), home zone NEW TOWN streets, new public space, commercial space Street plus the associated development the site. 11 Status: Zonal masterplan to be submitted for Developer: London Legacy Development space and community facilities. Status: Planning permission granted planning approval in summer 2016 Corporation Status: Under construction at Strand East to the south. 13 Developer: London Legacy Development Developer: Workspace 1 Corporation, East Wick and Sweetwater Developer: LCR and East Thames Group Pudding Mill DLR station is located 14 Projects Ltd 8 RICK ROBERTS WAY 14 THE INTERNATIONAL QUARTER 3 Summary: Provision of approx. 500 new Summary: 4 million sq ft of new CONNECTIONS at the junction of Marshgate Lane 3 HACKNEY WICK CENTRAL homes as part of a mixed-use masterplan. workplace - TFL and the FCA confirmed as Summary: Creation of a new neighbourhood tenants. A 4 star hotel, shops, restaurants, 17 centre focused around Hackney Wick Status: Outline planning permission granted, childcare and community facilities. Up to with secondary school relocated within 25,000 jobs created. and Barbers Road and acts as a new 2 14 Station. The new station which includes an The ‘Greenway’, a strategic pedestrian underpass through the existing embankment PDZ3 (see no. 6) and further amendments 4 under consideration Status: Construction started in 2014, first 16 will create a new north – south pedestrian office occupation in 2017 gateway to the site. An allotment link. The neighbourhood centre development Developer: London Legacy Development and cycle route, bisects Pudding will consist of workspace clusters with Corporation and Newham Developer: Lend Lease and LCR a diverse range of spaces, retail, local roughly 1 hectare in size, is located amenities, and the introduction of between Mill and provides an important link 15 800-850 new homes. 15 GLASSHOUSE GARDENS 9 HERE EAST Bow Back River 6 Status: Planning permission granted for Summary: The residential development south of the railway viaduct. BOW EAST 5 the new station. Outline application for the Summary: Transforming the former Olympic that forms part of The International between Stratford and Hackney, as well Hackney Wick Neighbourhood Centre to be Press and Broadcast Centre – an innovation Quarter - 330 new homes looking out over submitted April 2016 centre set to provide over 1.2 million square the iconic buildings of the south of the feet of space for creative entrepreneurs Park as part of The International Quarter. as routes into the Park. Developer: London Legacy Development and creating up to 7,500 jobs on site and in Corporation the local community. Key tenants include Status: Final completion estimated for A cluster of residential buildings 6 BT Sport, Hackney Community College, 2017 Loughborough University and Infinity SDC. Developer: Lend Lease and LCR 7 Status: BT Sport already broadcast on site, A network of waterways known as the occupy a triangular piece of land 4 STRATFORD WATERFRONT fully operational by 2018 Summary: A new campus for UAL’s London 16 CHERRY PARK College of Fashion, along with major new Developer: iCITY, a joint venture between between the City Mill River and 8 spaces for the Victoria and Albert Museum Delancey and Infinity SDC Summary: Approx 1,200 new homes ‘Bow Back Rivers’ intersects with the and Sadler’s Wells. alongside community facilities, 20 restaurants, cafes and a servicing facility 7 Status: Cultural and Education District for Marks and Spencer. Greenway, whilst a number of high outline planning applications due to be 10 CHOBHAM MANOR Great Eastern Railway viaduct, submitted late 2016 Summary: The first of the five new Status: Hybrid planning application 19 neighbourhoods from 2015. Including 828 submitted Developer: London Legacy Development new homes, 75% designed for families and Greenway (Northern Outfall Sewer) and rise residential towers are located to Corporation with site partners Developer: Stratford City Developments 18 1/3 affordable homes. Shops, cafes, bars Ltd and other facilities will support a vibrant High Street Stratford. the south of the Bow Back River along Pudding Mill Site Boundary community. LLDC Boundary Status: Sales underway, first residents 17 ANGEL LANE Stratford High Street. LB Hackney Boundary occupied their homes in late 2015 Summary: Unite student accommodation LB Newham Boundary Developer: Chobham Manor LLP for 750 students, new hotel, a major 5 THE STADIUM apartment tower and offices. LB Tower Hamlets Boundary Summary: From 2016 the Stadium will Status: Opened September 2015 There is the potential to expand and Health Centre become the home of West Ham United, 11 EAST VILLAGE Developer: Unite Group Plc Education / Training before then it will host a number of BROMLEY- international events including the Rugby Summary: 2,818 new homes, a new school improve these links, particularly the Workspace World Cup in 2015. A new community track (Chobham Academy - see point 12), a new BY-BOW 18 STRAND EAST Cultural / Exhibition will be open alongside the Stadium and will health centre, cafés, bars, restaurants, be home to the Newham and Essex Beagles shops and 27 acres of public space. Further Summary: 1,200 homes, office spaces for Greenway, as the near-by UCL East Business Athletic Club. The Stadium will also become developments for an additional 2,000 homes a range of businesses including digital and Hotel / Student Housing the new national centre for athletics from are currently in the planning process. creatives, a riverside park and a range of 2016. retail and community uses. Community Facilities Status: Now open site and Stratford Waterfront are Status: Fully open from summer 2016 Status: Planning permission granted Retail / Leisure N Developer: Get Living London and Triathlon Developer: E20 Stadium LLP Homes developed. Sport Developer: Vastint UK Surrounding Area

Plan showing some of the major developments in the area. Waterworks River (Dots do not indicate locations of facilities)

13 14 15

Pudding Mill Introductory Flip-Book | Summer 2016 Pudding Mill Introductory Flip-Book | Summer 2016 Pudding Mill Introductory Flip-Book | Summer 2016

Existing

PUDDING MILL New 12

KEY ASPIRATIONS 1 Allotments WARTON ROAD

        Bridgewater Square and   2     connection to Greenway 1

BOW ELECTRICITY SUBSTATION, WATERWORKS RIVER The masterplan seeks to deliver the following: 3 Stratford High Street Bow Electricity Substation and the new

4 Station Square headhouses for the underground power • A new residential neighbourhood that • Taller buildings that are located to signify key 9 lines are situated in the centre of Pudding provides a range of housing to meet local locations or relationships within the masterplan, 5 Pudding Mill Square

 Mill, on either side of Pudding Mill      need such as the arrival at Pudding Mill DLR or 3 Lane. 6 East - West Street 2 • A new Local Centre providing flexible proximity with Stratford High Street Residential blocks These enclosures form part of London’s 7 employment floorspace, retail units and • A wide range of public open spaces, including 9

   CITY MILL RIVER  strategic infrastructure network and have     Mews   8  community facilities  13     play provision for all ages   4   11  specific operational constraints that need  

      to be respected. They therefore require • A high-quality environment comprising a • Improved pedestrian and cycle connectivity 9 Towpath       5    careful integration into the layout of         variety of building uses and typologies  within the site, as well as new links to the Park  Bow Back Square  10  STRATFORD HIGH STREET  the neighbourhood to avoid stretches  • A place that will engage with its immediate and Stratford High Street  PUDDING MILL LANE of uninhabited frontage alongside poor  11  Railway  6     7    quality public space. context in terms of form and character  12 UCL East

EAST - WEST STREET 13 City Mill Yard 8                    BOW BACK RIVER   The Greenway   9

                  Local Centre   10 Improved Connectivity  Pudding Mill Lane Station                                         23  19 20      

Pudding Mill Introductory Flip-Book | Summer 2016 Pudding Mill Introductory Flip-Book | Summer 2016 Pudding Mill Introductory Flip-Book | Summer 2016

PRECEDENT IMAGES A DIVERSE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBOURHOOD

KEY FEATURES 2

UCL EAST

WARTON ROAD • A diversity of typologies, from mews houses, • To support a diverse residential neighbourhood Bridgewater

ALLOTMENTS to stacked maisonette, to mansion blocks to the masterplan is comprised of a network of close, WATERWORKS RIVER residential towers. intimate streets and shared spaces connecting a 4 series of distinct public spaces with larger more

GREENWAY formal blocks dissected by mews streets and 3

CITY MILL RIVER 1. Workspace 2. Local Retail passages. 1 Mews House 2 Terraced House • One of the key aspects of the landscape strategy

STRATFORD HIGH STREET Dual Aspect Residential Block Pudding Mill is to ensure integration between the new 4 Single Aspect Residential Block Stacked Maisonettes neighbourhood and its adjacent key routes Mews 1 Sheltered Housing and sites through shared public open spaces or BOW BACK RIVER Townhouses Taller Buildings ‘neighbourhood places’ Pudding Mill Lane Station

Residential Typologies Plan

3 Perimeter Block 4 Hybrid Block

3. High Density Residential 4. Community Facilities

29 27 28

79 Chapter 5 | Appendices C. Main exhibition materials

Introductory Flip-Book | Summer 2016 Pudding Mill Introductory Flip-Book | Summer 2016 Pudding Mill Introductory Flip-Book | Summer 2016 Pudding Mill

PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND PLAY AREAS

43 27 Pudding Mill Site KEY FEATURES 20 Stratford High Street UCL East 20 • In order to create a successful urban 27 Warton Road • Each public space within the masterplan responds neighbourhood with a sense of intimacy Heights (in storeys) P directly to its immediate context and is connected WATERWORKS RIVER and intensity, a 6-storey datum has been Allotments through a variety of streets and shared spaces established across the site. P P • Pudding Mill Square has an urban character in P • Key moments have then been reinforced by response to its location within the Local Centre. Bridgewater Green Pudding Mill Square Greenway taller context sensitive elements, which provide CITY MILL RIVER landmarks to improve legibility within the site. • Marshgate Yard is informal, working and robust P 23 P due to its enclosure by employment and housing. Marshgate yard

Pudding Mill Lane Station • Bow Back Green is more relaxed, green and P

P

playful, articulating a widening in the river and STRATFORD HIGH STREET

BARBER ROAD

benefiting from its southerly orientation. P Marshgate Lane Square • Bridgwater Green is more domestic in scale, BOW BACK RIVER

providing a moment of rest along the Greenway. P Bow Back Green • Play space provision will offer a range of leisure P Indicative Local Play and recreation opportunities for users of all ages. Public Open Spaces and Play Areas Building Heights Scale and Massing

30 31 34

Introductory Flip-Book | Summer 2016 Pudding Mill Introductory Flip-Book | Summer 2016 Pudding Mill Pudding Mill Introductory Flip-Book | Summer 2016 SUMMER 2016

PRECEDENT IMAGES

Bow Back Green Visualisation - Board 6

1. River Bank Planting 2. Play space

FIND OUT MORE

To ask any questions or to let us know you would like to recieve future updates, please contact the Pudding Mill team at Fluid on:

020 7729 0770

[email protected]

Fluid Indicative Local Play 148 Curtain Road London EC2A 3AT Illustrative Visualisation: Bow Back Green You can also keep up to date on the web by visiting: 3. Public Squares 4. Landscaped Areas Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park website http://queenelizabetholympicpark.co.uk/the-park/homes-and-living/pudding-mill 35 37 39

80 Chapter 5 | Appendices C. Main exhibition materials

C4. Quick comment sheet (A5)

PUDDING MILL

Your comment(s)

Name (optional): Postcode (optional):

Comment(s):

PUDDING MILL

Your comment(s)

Name (optional):

Postcode (optional):

Comment(s):

81 Chapter 5 | Appendices C. Main exhibition materials

C5. Feedback form (A3)

03. Do you support our view for the new Local Centre at Pudding Mill, providing flexible employment and retail floorspace, as well as new community facilities?

Yes No Don’t know PUDDING FEEDBACK FORM

Please tell us your thoughts to help inform What type of facilities would you like to see provided? the developing plans for Pudding Mill. MILL Your name:

Are you:

a local resident part of an organisation(s): Do you think the mix of employment and residential being proposed is appropriate? a visitor

01. What is your overall impression of the proposals for Pudding Mill?

Excited Generally positive Neutral Unsure Unexcited

04. How well do you think the masterplan connects to the wider area through new pedestrian, cycling and public transport routes? Tell us more...

Not enough Just enough Too many Don’t know connections conections connections

Are there any missed opportunities, and/or do you have any suggestions?

02. Do you support the aspiration to provide additional housing at Pudding Mill to meet local needs?

Yes No Don’t know

82 Chapter 5 | Appendices C. Main exhibition materials

05. How well do you think the masterplan provides a good range of 08. Have you found this event informative? public open spaces, including play provision, for use by future residents, visitors and surrounding communities? Yes No Don’t know

Very well Well Don’t know Poorly Not at all

19. Do you have any further comments?

Are there any missed opportunities, and/or do you have any suggestions? What works well? What else could be provided for?

06. Do you agree with the approach to character and form?

Strongly Strongly agree Agree Don’t know Disagree disagree Have you attended previous consultation events?

Yes No Tell us more...

Tick as appropriate

Cultural and Education District Public Exhibition (February 2016)

Other:

Your details*:

07. Do you ever use Pudding Mill at present? Address:

Yes No

Postcode: Telephone:

If so, why? Email:

DLR station Do not contact Access to the park *We will only contact you regarding the project and your details will not be used Allotments for any other purposes.

Other (please say):

If not, will the proposals presented here today encourage you to do so?

Yes No Don’t know

83 Chapter 5 | Appendices D.Pop up materials

D. Pop up materials

D1. Banners

PUDDING MILL THE EMERGING MASTERPLAN

The Legacy Corporation is revisiting of Pudding Mill, as supported by the the Pudding Mill masterplan in response Local Plan, which maximises residential 1 to the changing context of adjoining capacity and employment opportunities, WARTON ROAD developments, including the Cultural and as well as meeting key priorities around

Education District. local economic benefit, equality and         inclusion, sustainability and community       The Legacy Corporation wants to create engagement. 3 a vibrant Local Centre at the heart WATERWORKS RIVER

2 Pudding Mill

1 UCL EAST

2 Great Eastern Railway

CITY MILL RIVER

  3 Allotments                   4 Bow Substation  

      The Greenway 

    Local Centre  London Stadium                London Aquatics Centre Pudding Mill   Lane Station  Improved

  Connectivity    PUDDING MILL LANE      

STRATFORD HIGH STREET

EAST - WEST STREET 4

                  BOW BACK RIVER     

                    



                           The masterplan seeks to deliver:                • A new residential neighbourhood that   provides a range of housing to meet local THE need BACKGROUND • A new Local Centre providing flexible The Legacy Communities Scheme planning social infrastructure and open space. employment floorspace, retail units and application, which was approved in In total the scheme allowed for community facilities September 2012, proposed a range of around 1,300 homes, plus a range of VISION • A high-quality environment comprising a employment and residential uses at employment floorspace, retail units and variety of building uses and typologies Pudding Mill, as well as other supporting community facilities. • A place that will engage with its immediate context in terms of form and character FOR • Taller buildings that are located to signify key locations or relationships within the Coming to Queen Elizabeth Olympic masterplan, such as the arrival at Pudding SAT 30 JULY - Park - the latest proposals for the Mill DLR or proximity with Stratford High redevelopment of Pudding Mill. PUDDING Street SAT 13 AUGUST • A wide range of public open spaces, Sat 30th, 6th & 13th from 11am to 5pm All are welcome - the team will be on including play provision for all ages Tues 2nd & 9th from 11am to 3pm hand to answer questions, discuss the • Improved pedestrian and cycle Wed 3th & 10th from 1pm to 5pm scheme in more detail and explain what MILL connectivity within the site, as well as new Thurs 11th from 4pm to 8pm happens next. links to the Park and Stratford High Street Fri 5th from 4pm to 8pm

L ONDON The Upper Welcome Zone, London Aquatics Centre, AQUATICS Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park, CENTRE E20 2ZQ

Pudding Mill Square Bow Back Green Marshgate Lane Square Illustrative Visualisations

This area is not visible This area is not visible

84 Chapter 5 | Appendices D.Pop up materials

85 This consultation report has been produced by: Chapter 5 | Appendices

Fluid D.Pop up materials

148 Curtain Road London EC2A 3AT

Any queries should be referred to the Pudding Mill consultation team as follows:

020 7729 0770

[email protected]

Pudding Mill website http://queenelizabetholympicpark.co.uk/the-park/homes-and-living/pudding-mill

88