Excavations at Crown Wharf, Dace Road, Tower Hamlets

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Excavations at Crown Wharf, Dace Road, Tower Hamlets BRIDGING THE LEA: EXCAVATIONS AT CROWN WHARF, DACE ROAD, TOWER HAMLETS Angus Stephenson With a contribution by Damian Goodburn SUMMARY After the Romano-British period, a phase of natural alluvial deposition appears to have occurred before post- An excavation in advance of development at Crown medieval industrial activity began on the site. At least Wharf, Dace Road, Tower Hamlets, revealed a sequence one, and possibly two, timber-lined tanks and several of archaeological deposits within a former channel of timber conduits were exposed across the site. One of the the River Lea. A peat layer at the base of the sequence tanks had reused sections of a London ‘Western-type’ has been radio-carbon dated to the Mesolithic period, barge in its lining. The tanks are thought to date from between 8460 and 7340 cal BC. the 18th century and were overlain by brick footings, Above this lay naturally formed deposits of alluvial conduits and made ground. clay. Approximately 40 large oak piles driven into these layers were recorded. Many of these piles showed INTRODUCTION boxed heart conversion and were trimmed to points with axes in typical Roman fashion and four have The excavation at Crown Wharf Ironworks, been radiocarbon-dated to the early Roman period. The Dace Road, in the London Borough of timbers continued beyond the edges of the excavated area Tower Hamlets, London EC3, was conducted to the north and east, but were recorded over distances by the AOC Archaeology Group (site code: of c.7m in both directions. They appear to form roughly DAC03), for CPM Environmental Planning parallel lines across and within a structure running and Design, acting for Pollard Thomas and from SSW to NNE, and some are interpreted as being Edwards, architects, on behalf of London part of the structure of an early Roman bridge. Green Developments Ltd, the developing In the later Roman period the base of the stream client. channel appears to have been consolidated with gravel The site lies on the west side of the River and sand dumped over the timbers. Finds from these Lea as canalised by the River Lea Navigation layers contained 3rd- and 4th-century Roman pottery (Hackney) Cut in the late 18th century. It is and ceramic building material. This gravel dumping bounded on the east by the River Lea, on the may have formed a causeway through the marshy north by the Swan Wharf warehouses and ground in the later Roman period at a time when river Dace Road, on the west by the warehouses of levels were known to have fallen. Two large post-pits, Percy Dalton’s Company, and on the south cut through these gravels 5.60m apart, may have been by the raised 19th-century Northern Outfall part of a gateway structure built to control local access. Sewer (Fig 1). The site is located within an The final phase of Roman activity identified on the Archaeological Priority Area as defined in site comprised a group of smaller stakes across the line the London Borough of Tower Hamlets of the two large posts; this was possibly a fence-line Unitary Development Plan. closing off access to the area from this direction. In order to comply with planning condit- 39 N Stratford Hackney Rail Depot Wick BR South A12 Hackney Site Victoria Park A106 Lefevre Stratford Walk sewer Old Ford Road 1:20000 0 500m B119 Roman Road Wick Lane 000 000 SMEED ROAD 37 37 5 5 Works Warehouse DACE ROAD Hackney Cut T2 River Lee Navigation Works 537000 T4 T3 Fig 4 T5 Sewer 0 50m 1:1000 Fig 1. Site location Fig 1: Site Location Bridging the Lea: Excavations at Crown Wharf, Dace Road, Tower Hamlets 41 ions, five evaluation trenches, 2m wide and part of it or in the run-up to the Roman 10m long, were to be dug in locations which invasion. It has been conjectured, however, avoided previous investigation trenches and that the major Roman road from Silchester boreholes, and which would be affected by the to Colchester (which ran along Old Street foundations of the proposed development. and through Bethnal Green, close to the These trenches were excavated in reverse north side of modern Roman Road) may numerical order to facilitate machine access have had Iron Age antecedents (Black 1977), and after inspection of the first three trenches and there is limited evidence for Iron Age opened, it was agreed that Trenches 1 and occupation of the general area. 2 should be replaced with a single trench The evidence for activity during the 4m square at the base (Trench 2). The Roman period, however, is incontestable numbering on the trench location plan (Fig and extensive. The first signs that there may 1) is therefore in accordance with the site have been Roman occupation in the area records. During the excavation of Trench 5 were supplied by chance finds, usually in the by mechanical excavator, substantial timbers form of coins and burials, and more recently were encountered and the strategy was through controlled excavation. The first of revised so that an extended trench was dug these were concentrated in an area to the as shown in Fig 1. south of the present site. It has long been suggested that there might GEOLOGICAL CONTEXT be substantial remains of the main Roman road between London and Colchester to be Crown Wharf Ironworks is on the floodplain found (eg RCHM 1928) but actual physical of the River Lea, close to the western edge evidence was only found in 1969 (Sheldon of the alluvial tract comprising deposits of 1971), after which it was confirmed on several sand, silt and clay (Branch et al 2005, 1). subsequent sites (eg Sheldon 1972). The most The floodplain here is c.1.6km in width and comprehensively recorded sighting of this is flanked on both sides by discontinuous road was made during the excavations by Pre- remnants of a low terrace, now regarded as Construct Archaeology (PCA) during 1995— equivalent to the Kempton Park Terrace of 1996 at Lefevre Walk, approximately 400m to the River Thames. The bedrock beneath the the south-west of the present site (Brown et valley floor is the Lower Tertiary London al forthcoming). The full width of the road Clay or, in places, sediments of the Lower including the two side ditches was approx- Tertiary Lambeth Group (Woolwich and imately 26m. The construction of the road Reading Beds). apparently began within a few years of the Claudian invasion and it appears to have been ARCHAEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND in use throughout most of the Roman period, often with modifications to one or more of the There has been little evidence found of land- three tracks. The boundary ditches defining use in the immediate vicinity of the site before the road zone appear to have been recut very the Roman period. A Palaeolithic axe and late in the Roman period and evidence of an unretouched flint flake were recovered local occupation and roadside activities was from Victoria Park (GLSMR 080060) and a found continuing at least until the end of the Mesolithic tranchet axe was found nearby 4th and possibly into the 5th century. (GLSMR 080080), but these were apparently The exact nature of the settlement isolated finds. The Neolithic and Bronze Age around Old Ford continues to be somewhat are also sparsely represented, with no evidence enigmatic and the evidence will be reviewed of land being exploited to any great extent in a forthcoming monograph (Brown et al in this area, although evidence of prehistoric forthcoming). For present purposes it may occupation of Bronze Age date was found suffice to say that the settlement, if such it during the Lefevre Walk excavations of the is, has produced large quantities of Roman 1990s (Brown et al forthcoming). pottery, coins, burials, ditches, pits and The central area of London is not believed animal bones, particularly of cattle, all in to have held any major political importance fairly close proximity to each other, if not of during the Iron Age, either in the earlier the same historical date. 42 Angus Stephenson The nature of the crossing-point for the area is thus effectively an island within two Roman road over the Lea has never been narrower areas of marshy land beside the proved. The name Old Ford is of (late) Saxon river channels. It is therefore suggested that origin and does not imply that the Roman the Roman road made use of this to reduce crossing-point also consisted of a ford. The the bridging or fording distances and made river probably comprised a series of braided a slight adjustment of the route’s alignment channels at this date and one might think near the top of the hill. that it would be at least inconvenient to have It was hypothesized for some time that the a long ford in the middle of a strategically Roman road actually crossed the western important road. That said, although the stream(s) via a ford a short distance to the actual road has been seen at several points south. Reginald Smith reported in 1910 both east and west of the Lea, there has that a section of herringbone pavement had never been any observation of any timber been found during dredging operations structure for a bridge connecting the known in the Lea between Iceland and Bundock road alignments at Old Ford on the west side Wharves (Smith 1910; GLSMR 0815171) and of the Lea and Stratford on the east. suggested that this pavement formed part of The natural topography of the area, the solid bed of the ford across the river.
Recommended publications
  • The Lea Valley Walk
    THE LEA VALLEY WALK LEAGRAVE TO THE HEART OF LONDON by Leigh Hatts JUNIPER HOUSE, MURLEY MOSS, OXENHOLME ROAD, KENDAL, CUMBRIA LA9 7RL www.cicerone.co.uk 774 Lea Valley text 2020 3rd Ed Rpt.indd 3 28/09/2020 14:52 © Leigh Hatts 2015 Third edition 2015 ISBN 978 1 85284 774 6 Reprinted 2020 (with updates) Second edition 2007 First edition 2001 Printed in Singapore by KHL using responsibly sourced paper. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. All photographs are by the author unless otherwise stated. This product includes mapping data licensed from Ordnance Survey® with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. © Crown copyright 2015. All rights reserved. Licence number PU100012932. Updates to this Guide While every effort is made by our authors to ensure the accuracy of guidebooks as they go to print, changes can occur during the lifetime of an edition. Any updates that we know of for this guide will be on the Cicerone website (www.cicerone.co.uk/774/updates), so please check before planning your trip. We also advise that you check information about such things as transport, accommodation and shops locally. Even rights of way can be altered over time. We are always grateful for information about any discrepancies between a guidebook and the facts on the ground, sent by email to [email protected] or by post to Cicerone, Juniper House, Murley Moss, Oxenholme Road, Kendal, LA9 7RL. Register your book: To sign up to receive free updates, special offers and GPX files where available, register your book at www.cicerone.co.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • How Do You Lose a River?
    Number 1,1, SpringSummer 2016 2015 Waypoints 1 How do you lose a river? In this paper I explore the concept of the lost river and the implications this Jonathan Gardner term has for our understanding of the history of changing urban environ- jonathan.gardner@ucl. ments. ac.uk In taking a voyage down one of the London 2012 Olympic Park’s now-filled waterways, the Pudding Mill River, charting it and the surrounding area’s diverse history, I explore how rivers end up becoming losable. Drawing on diverse methodologies from archaeology and geography and with a particular emphasis on mapping, I argue that a literal and metaphorical exploration of such a rapidly changing environment reveals a multitude of buried narratives and fluid histories. This research suggests that the labeling of a river as lost is not a politically neutral act and that, with its romantic connotations, the term may actually serve to legitimise insensitive and contentious changes to our environment. Much has been written about London’s numerous lost watercourses over the years, most notably Nicho- las Barton’s seminal volume The Lost Rivers of London [1] and more, recently Paul Talling’s London’s Lost Riv- ers [2] and Tom Bolton’s London’s Lost Rivers: A Walker’s Guide [3]. In addition to these works a large range of blogs and websites devoted to the lost rivers are continually created and updated, for example, Diamond Geezer 2015 [4]. The subject is one that seems to inspire intense interest amongst a wide range of people and would suggest that city-dwellers are curiously attracted to such forgotten or lost spaces, and in particular, the unusual juxtaposition of the natural and the urban these watercourses seem to present.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossrail Act 2008 Page 1
    Crossrail Act 2008 Page 1 Crossrail Act 2008 2008 CHAPTER 18 Thomson Reuters (Legal) Limited. UK Statutes Crown Copyright. Reproduced by permission of the Controller of Her Majesty©s Stationery Of®ce. An Act to make provision for a railway transport system running from Maidenhead, in the County of Berkshire, and Heathrow Airport, in the London Borough of Hillingdon, through central London to Shen®eld, in the County of Essex, and Abbey Wood, in the London Borough of Greenwich; and for connected purposes. [22nd July 2008] BE IT ENACTED by the Queen©s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:± Extent Preamble: England, Wales, Scotland Works Law In Force 1 Construction and maintenance of scheduled works (1) The nominated undertaker may construct and maintain the works speci®ed in Schedule 1 (ªthe scheduled worksº), being± (a) works for the construction of an underground railway between, in the west, a tunnel portal at Royal Oak in the City of Westminster and, in the east, tunnel portals at Custom House and Pudding Mill Lane in the London Borough of Newham, (b) works for the construction of other railways in the London Boroughs of Barking & Dagenham, Bexley, Ealing, Greenwich, Hammersmith and Fulham, Havering, Hillingdon, Newham, Redbridge and Tower Hamlets, the City of Westminster, the Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea, the District of Basildon and the Borough of Brentwood in the County of Essex, the Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead and the Borough of Slough in the County of Berkshire and the District of South Bucks in the County of Buckinghamshire, (c) works consequent on, or incidental to, the construction of the works mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b).
    [Show full text]
  • LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD
    LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD ACC/2423 Reference Description Dates LEE CONSERVANCY BOARD ENGINEER'S OFFICE Engineers' reports and letter books LEE CONSERVANCY BOARD: ENGINEER'S REPORTS ACC/2423/001 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1881 Jan-1883 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/002 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1884 Jan-1886 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/003 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1887 Jan-1889 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/004 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1890 Jan-1893 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/005 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1894 Jan-1896 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/006 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1897 Jan-1899 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/007 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1903 Jan-1903 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/008 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1904 Jan-1904 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/009 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1905 Jan-1905 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/010 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1906 Jan-1906 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 2 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD ACC/2423 Reference Description Dates ACC/2423/011 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1908 Jan-1908 Lea navigation/ stort navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/012 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1912 Jan-1912 Lea navigation/ stort navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/013 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1913 Jan-1913 Lea navigation/ stort navigation
    [Show full text]
  • Hackney Today Is Produced by the Communications & Consultation Team at London Borough of Hackney, Room 82, Hackney Town Hall, Mare Street, E8 1EA
    hackneytoday Circulated to 108,000 homes and businesses by Hackney Council Issue 295 19 November 2012 inside 3 Right on Brand 5 Festive cheer 11 Hackney People 15 Listings pull-out 16 Never forget Photo: Gary Manhine WIN Veteran Jack Webb at the annual Remembrance Sunday parade and service in Hackney Dick Whittington RESIDENTS joined Sunday parade and church remember those who have the Normandy Veterans and Girls Brigade Band, the panto tickets ex-servicemen and women service on 11 November. given their lives in wars and Association, Royal British Sea Cadets, Army Cadets, Air and civic dignitaries to The second Sunday in conflicts past and present. Legion and members of Training corps and Red Cross. remember the fallen at the November is traditionally the Taking part in the parade other local associations See pages 6-7 for more borough’s Remembrance day put aside each year to were representatives from including the Jewish Lads info and pics. 25 Hackney History www.hackney.gov.uk 2 19 November 2012 hackneynews Hackney Today is produced by the Communications & Consultation team at London Borough of Hackney, Room 82, Hackney Town Hall, Mare Street, E8 1EA. E-mail: htnews@ hackney.gov.uk Editor: Jane Young Tel: 020 8356 3275 E: [email protected] Sub-editor & designer: Sappho Lauder today Tel: 020 8356 2342 E: [email protected] Reporter: Marcel Reinard Photos: Gary Manhine Tel: 020 8356 4966 E: [email protected] Advertising & distribution manager David Roberts Tel: 020 8356 2416 Say no to E: [email protected] Clockwise from main: PCSO Mohammed Ashraf talks to Lisa and Elle Knight, two; Claire Bunker, of Hackney Trading Standards, with a member of the public; Hackney Today is published Leanna Brown and Paulette Flardware with Chief by the London Borough Inspector Andy Walker; Bahar Seven and Audrey Lee of Hackney.
    [Show full text]
  • British Waterways Board General Canal Bye-Laws
    BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD GENERAL CANAL BYE-LAWS 1965 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD BYE-LAWS ____________________ for regulation of the canals belonging to or under the control of the British Waterways Board (other than the canals specified in Bye-law 1) made pursuant to the powers of the British Transport Commission Act, 1954. (N.B. – The sub-headings and marginal notes do not form part of these Bye-laws). Application of Bye-laws Application of 1. These Bye-laws shall apply to every canal or inland navigation in Bye-Laws England and Wales belonging to or under the control of the British Waterways Board except the following canals: - (a) The Lee and Stort Navigation (b) the Gloucester and Sharpness Canal (c) the River Severn Navigation which are more particularly defined in the Schedule hereto. Provided that where the provisions of any of these Bye-laws are limited by such Bye-law to any particular canal or locality then such Bye-law shall apply only to such canal or locality to which it is so limited. These Bye-laws shall come into operation at the expiration of twenty-eight days after their confirmation by the Minister of Transport as from which date all existing Bye-laws applicable to the canals and inland navigations to which these Bye-laws apply (other than those made under the Explosives Act 1875, and the Petroleum (Consolidation) Act 1928) shall cease to have effect, without prejudice to the validity of anything done thereunder or to any liability incurred in respect of any act or omission before the date of coming into operation of these Bye-laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Hackney Marshes & Adjacent Green Spaces
    Electricity Generating Station on east bank of Lea was built MAP SERIES OF WALKS Wick Woodland is at a lower level from the rest of Hackney in 1901. It used coal brought by barge and stored on the Marshes because no materials were dumped on it after Marshes. Most of the power station and its tall chimney were CONNECTING HACKNEY’S World War II. It is edged with mature trees: plane trees demolished in 1970, and is now Hackney Cleansing Depot. In alongside the canal; black poplar and ash along Homerton front of it a path connects Cow Bridge with Millfields. Road. Football was played here until the late 1980s. In the Middlesex Filter Beds. The water powered mills from C14 PARKS & OPEN SPACES mid-1990s it was planted with native trees, including black to C19. In C19 became Filter Beds to provide clean and safe poplar. It is now home to a variety of birds and plants and is water for East London. After the plant at Coppermills was managed with the help of the local community. opened in 1970s, the Beds became a nature reserve: open Arena Field (owned by the Olympic Delivery Authority since daily, but times may vary through the year. 2007) lies at the southern end of Hackney Marshes. Trees and bushes near the Lea Navigation Canal were home to Hackney Marshes came into public ownership at the end of many birds, including house sparrows. The Channel Tunnel C19 when many of the mature trees were planted – planes, Rail Link between Stratford and Kings Cross runs under its ash, and native black poplars (the largest collection in London southern end.
    [Show full text]
  • Lee Valley Regional Park Landscape Character Assessment
    LCT C: Urban Valley Floor with Marshlands SPA, which provides a nationally important habitat for overwintering birds. Cultural Influences 4.64 The low-lying land of rich alluvial deposits supported a system of grazing, referred to as the Lammas system5 from the Anglo-Saxon period to the end of the C19th. Grazing rights on the marshes were extinguished by the early C20th and a substantial proportion of the marshlands, with the exception of Walthamstow Marshes, were then modified by industrial activities and landfill, including the dumping of bomb rubble after WW2. In the 1950 and 60s the construction of flood relief channels ended the periodic inundation of the marshlands. 4.65 Communication routes through the valley floor proliferated over the C20th, including pylons, roads and railway lines mounted on embankments, but residential and industrial development remains largely confined to the margins. 4.66 Public access and recreation now characterises much of the marshlands, with some areas managed as nature reserves. However substantial infrastructure, such as the railway lines and flood relief channels and adjacent industrial development, means access through and into the marshes from surrounding urban areas is often severed. The tow-path following the River Lee Navigation provides a continuous link along the valley for visitors to enjoy the landscape. 5 A system of grazing whereby cattle was grazed only after the cutting and collection of hay Lee Valley Regional Park Landscape Strategy 85 April 2019 LCA C1: Rammey Marsh Lee Valley Regional Park Landscape Strategy 86 April 2019 LCA C1: Rammey Marsh Occasional long views out to wooded valley sides between Residential properties overlooking the southern area across the riverside vegetation.
    [Show full text]
  • Carpenters Road Lock Heritage from the Shadow of the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park
    Carpenters Road Lock Heritage from the shadow of the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Conservation Management Plan Florence Salberter Heritage Adviser Canal & River Trust May 2015 CONTENT 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Purpose and scope of the document 1.2 Authorship 2.0 Understanding the historic asset 2.1 Historic context: a changing waterscape 2.2 Carpenters Road Lock: Why the lock was built and how it works 2.2.1 A unique lock design 2.2.2 A 1930s project 2.2.3 Dual function: Flood protection and navigation 2.2.4 Hygienic improvement 2.3 The Olympics’ legacy and the lock restoration 2.3.1 Abandoned waterways: how the lock fell into disrepair and is being recovered as part of the Olympics’ Legacy 2.3.2 Parallels between Olympics led regeneration today and the regeneration scheme of the 1930s depression 3.0 Statement of Significance and conservation principles 3.1 A lock with dual functions in response to local conditions 3.2 Conservation principles 4.0 Vulnerability and Risks 4.1 Threats to the heritage 4.1.1 Funding shortage 4.1.2 Inappropriate design intervention 4.1.3 Lack of maintenance 4.2 Interpretation 4.2.1 Content quality 4.2.2 Design and Vandalism 4.2.3 Sharing of information 5.0 Conservation Management aims and objectives 5.1 Broad aims and objectives for safeguarding heritage significance 5.1.1 The Lock 5.1.2 Interpretation 5.2 Environmental Appraisal 5.3 Stakeholders’ engagement Carpenters Road Lock Conservation Plan Page 2 of 20 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose and Scope of the document This Conservation Management Plan has been prepared by the Canal & River Trust to support the second phase of the HLF Heritage Grant application to restore and interpret Carpenters Road Lock.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Management Plan
    SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN DRAIN LONDON LONDON BOROUGH OF HACKNEY FINAL DRAFT V2.1 Quality Management Quality Management DOCUMENT INFORMATION Title: Surface Water Management Plan for London Borough of Hackney Owner: Andrew Cunningham Version: v2.1 Status: Working draft Project Number: CS/046913 File Name: L:\Environment\ZWET\CS046913_DrainLondon_Tier2\Reports\Group4_Outp uts\Final_Deliverables\Hackney\SWMP\Main_Text\Word\DLT2_GP4_Hackn ey_SWMP Draft_V2.1.doc REVISION HISTORY Date of Summary of Changes Completed By Version Issue Initial draft SI 1.0 Amendments following initial Borough feedback SI 29/07/2011 2.0 Typo corrected on page 52 MA 04/03/2013 2.1 AUTHOR Name Organisation and Role Stephanie Ip Senior Consultant, Capita Symonds Ruth Farrar Consultant, Capita Symonds APPROVALS Name Title Signature Date Ruth Goodall Director, Capita Symonds Principal Consultant, Capita Michael Arthur Symonds Kevin Reid Programme Manager DISTRIBUTION Name Organisation and Role Andrew Cunningham Head of Streetscene, LB Hackney Kevin Reid Programme Manager, GLA Adam Littler Senior Engineer – Flooding – Streetscene – LB Hackney RELATED DOCUMENTS Date of Doc Ref Document Title Author Version Issue i Acknowledgements Acknowledgements A number of people and organisations outside Hackney Council have contributed to this Surface Water Management Plan. Their assistance is greatly appreciated, and in particularly inputs and information provided by: The British Geological Survey British Waterways Drain London Group 4 boroughs: o London Borough of Enfield o London Borough of Haringey o London Borough of Waltham Forest o London Borough of Newham o London Borough of Tower Hamlets The Environment Agency The Greater London Authority London Councils The London Fire Brigade Network Rail Thames Water Transport for London and London Underground ii Executive Summary Executive Summary This document forms the Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) for the London Borough (LB) of Hackney.
    [Show full text]
  • PARK DESIGN GUIDE 2018 Drafts 1 and 2 Prepared by Draft 3 and 4 Prepared By
    PARK DESIGN GUIDE 2018 Drafts 1 and 2 prepared by Draft 3 and 4 prepared by November 2017 January 2018 Draft Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date 1 for client review GW/RW/LD JR/GW NH HS 22/09/17 2 for final submission (for GW RW SJ HS 10/11/17 internal LLDC use) 3 for consultation AM/RH RH 24/11/17 4 final draft AM/RH RH LG 24/09/18 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 USER GUIDE 6 STREET FURNITURE STRATEGIC GUIDANCE STREET FURNITURE OVERVIEW 54 SEATING 55 PLAY FURNITURE 64 VISION 8 BOUNDARY TREATMENTS 66 INCLUSIVE DESIGN 9 PLANTERS 69 RELEVANT POLICIES AND GUIDANCE 10 BOLLARDS 70 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE AND BIODIVERSITY 12 LIGHTING 72 HERITAGE AND CONSERVATION 14 PUBLIC ART 74 VENUE MANAGEMENT 15 REFUSE AND RECYCLING FACILITIES 75 SAFETY AND SECURITY 16 WAYFINDING 76 TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE 17 CYCLE PARKING 80 TEMPORARY AND MOVEABLE FURNITURE 82 CHARACTER AREA DESIGN PRINCIPLES OTHER MISCELLANEOUS FURNITURE 84 QUEEN ELIZABETH OLYMPIC PARK 22 LANDSCAPE AND PLANTING NORTH PARK 23 SOUTH PARK 24 LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATION GUIDELINES 88 CANAL PARK 25 NORTH PARK 90 KEY DESIGN PRINCIPLES 26 SOUTH PARK 95 TREES 108 SURFACE MATERIALS SOIL AND EARTHWORKS 113 SUSTAINABLE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS (SUDS) 116 STANDARD MATERIALS PALETTE 30 WATERWAYS 120 PLAY SPACES 31 FOOTPATHS 34 CONSTRUCTION DESIGN AND MANAGEMENT FOOTWAYS 38 CARRIAGEWAYS 40 PARK OPERATIONS AND DESIGN MANAGEMENT 126 KERBS AND EDGING 42 RISK MANAGEMENT 127 SLOPES, RAMPS AND STEPS 45 CONSTRUCTION PLANNING AND MITIGATION 128 DRAINAGE 47 ASSET MANAGEMENT 129 PARKING AND LOADING 49 A PARK FOR THE FUTURE 130 UTILITIES 51 SURFACE MATERIALS MAINTENANCE 52 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS GLOSSARY REFERENCES QUEEN ELIZABETH OLYMPIC PARK DESIGN GUIDE INTRODUCTION CONTEXT Occupying more than 100ha, Queen Elizabeth Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Estate is made Olympic Park lies across the border of four up of development plots which are defined East London boroughs: Hackney, Newham, by Legacy Communities Scheme (LCS).
    [Show full text]
  • Waterways Framework Olympic Legacy Waterways Framework Foreword 3
    OLYMPIC LEGACY WATERWAYS FRAMEWORK OLYMPIC LEGACY WATERWAYS FRAMEWORK FOREWORD 3 Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park straddles a previously hidden and derelict network of waterways known as the Bow Back Rivers. Shaped and adapted for over 1,000 years, these 6km of canals and rivers are finally re-connected to England and Wales’ 2,000 mile inland waterways network owned by the Canal & River Trust. They now lie at the heart of one of the biggest regeneration projects in Europe. Across the country waterways are playing a vital role in revitalising our cities in an attractive and sustainable way. The restoration and transformation of the Bow Back Rivers through London’s Olympic plans and through the construction of Three Mills Lock has created a living legacy for London’s people and wildlife, and will form the backbone for a world class water city. The Olympic Legacy Waterways Framework developed by the London Legacy Development Corporation in partnership with the Canal & River Trust looks at how the rivers’ potential can be unlocked so that they are not just a visual backdrop to the surrounding developments, but a leisure and commercial resource in their own right. This strategy expands beyond the 6km within the Park to encompass the River Lee Navigation from Three Mills Island to Hackney Marshes and the lower end of the Hertford Union Canal – a length of 11km in total. TONY HALES QUOTE Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse aliquam, arcu quis vestibulum facilisis. BORIS JOHNSON QUOTE Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse aliquam, arcu quis vestibulum facilisis.
    [Show full text]