DOCSLIB.ORG

PARK DESIGN GUIDE 2018 Drafts 1 and 2 Prepared by Draft 3 and 4 Prepared By

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PARK DESIGN GUIDE 2018 Drafts 1 and 2 Prepared by Draft 3 and 4 Prepared By PARK DESIGN GUIDE 2018 Drafts 1 and 2 prepared by Draft 3 and 4 prepared by November 2017 January 2018 Draft Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date 1 for client review GW/RW/LD JR/GW NH HS 22/09/17 2 for final submission (for GW RW SJ HS 10/11/17 internal LLDC use) 3 for consultation AM/RH RH 24/11/17 4 final draft AM/RH RH LG 24/09/18 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 USER GUIDE 6 STREET FURNITURE STRATEGIC GUIDANCE STREET FURNITURE OVERVIEW 54 SEATING 55 PLAY FURNITURE 64 VISION 8 BOUNDARY TREATMENTS 66 INCLUSIVE DESIGN 9 PLANTERS 69 RELEVANT POLICIES AND GUIDANCE 10 BOLLARDS 70 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE AND BIODIVERSITY 12 LIGHTING 72 HERITAGE AND CONSERVATION 14 PUBLIC ART 74 VENUE MANAGEMENT 15 REFUSE AND RECYCLING FACILITIES 75 SAFETY AND SECURITY 16 WAYFINDING 76 TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE 17 CYCLE PARKING 80 TEMPORARY AND MOVEABLE FURNITURE 82 CHARACTER AREA DESIGN PRINCIPLES OTHER MISCELLANEOUS FURNITURE 84 QUEEN ELIZABETH OLYMPIC PARK 22 LANDSCAPE AND PLANTING NORTH PARK 23 SOUTH PARK 24 LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATION GUIDELINES 88 CANAL PARK 25 NORTH PARK 90 KEY DESIGN PRINCIPLES 26 SOUTH PARK 95 TREES 108 SURFACE MATERIALS SOIL AND EARTHWORKS 113 SUSTAINABLE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS (SUDS) 116 STANDARD MATERIALS PALETTE 30 WATERWAYS 120 PLAY SPACES 31 FOOTPATHS 34 CONSTRUCTION DESIGN AND MANAGEMENT FOOTWAYS 38 CARRIAGEWAYS 40 PARK OPERATIONS AND DESIGN MANAGEMENT 126 KERBS AND EDGING 42 RISK MANAGEMENT 127 SLOPES, RAMPS AND STEPS 45 CONSTRUCTION PLANNING AND MITIGATION 128 DRAINAGE 47 ASSET MANAGEMENT 129 PARKING AND LOADING 49 A PARK FOR THE FUTURE 130 UTILITIES 51 SURFACE MATERIALS MAINTENANCE 52 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS GLOSSARY REFERENCES QUEEN ELIZABETH OLYMPIC PARK DESIGN GUIDE INTRODUCTION CONTEXT Occupying more than 100ha, Queen Elizabeth Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Estate is made Olympic Park lies across the border of four up of development plots which are defined East London boroughs: Hackney, Newham, by Legacy Communities Scheme (LCS). Tower Hamlets and Waltham Forest, and is The LLDC’s priority theme of ‘High Quality one of the largest regeneration projects in Design,’ is to be applied to these plots and London’s history. Queen Elizabeth Olympic the remaining parkland areas, to maintain the Park won the Rosa Barba International design excellence seen through Games time, Landscape Prize 2016. The Park will forever and provide a consistency of high quality, be synonymous with the London 2012 accessible public realm, biodiversity and play Olympic and Paralympic Games, and is now as a lasting legacy. at a crucial development stage in becoming Stratford an integrated part of the wider urban grain of The neighbourhood and development plots International Bromley London. include: by Bow - Chobham Manor Attracting over six million visitors every year, - East Village Stratford the Park is already a huge draw for families, - East Bank sports enthusiasts and a growing population - East Wick and Sweetwater of local residents and businesses, as a large - Hackney Wick Metropolitan park of national significance. - Bromley By Bow - Pudding Mill Lane The London Legacy Development Corporation - Rick Roberts Way (LLDC) is the Planning Authority responsible Pudding for preserving the landscape quality of This guidance sets out the expected standards Mill Lane Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Estate, whilst for ensuring that good design and biodiversity managing and maintaining the Park. is sustained across the open spaces of the Estate, whilst integrating place making principles as part of the ongoing management of the Park. Venues Pudding Mill Lane East Wick and Sweetwater Chobham Manor East Bank Rick Roberts Way Bromley LLDC Planning Authority Motorway by Bow Borough boundaries Transport Links 4 QUEEN ELIZABETH OLYMPIC PARK DESIGN GUIDE PURPOSE The Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Design Guide is primarily designed to provide third party designers, developers and land managers with: ■ details on existing standards for the Park ■ documentation of the existing qualities of as a whole. the Park and existing planning permissions, such as the Legacy Communities Scheme ■ the overarching design principles shown as Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park expected by the LLDC for developing plans Estate on the adjacent plan. associated with proposed neighbourhoods and landscape improvements. ■ provision of supplementary design considerations for existing planning ■ how to incorporate standards for new applications (to complement existing Stratford open space proposals within developments International design codes). Bromley on Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Estate. by Bow ■ how design needs to fit with overall long ■ guidance on how the interface between term stewardship objectives of the Park Stratford new developments and parkland should be designed and managed. The Park Design Guide should be read in ■ design parameters for selecting materials conjunction with other relevant planning and products. permissions e.g. Legacy Communities Scheme ■ high level guidance on implementation (LCS), planning conditions and the Park standards. Management Plan. Pudding ■ sign posting to relevant policy and Mill Lane The map opposite highlights how this Guide standards. relates to the LLDC’s planning boundary. AREAS OF INFLUENCE PARK DESIGN GUIDE APPLICATION LLDC zone of influence Recommended for guiding wider neighbourhood public (Planning Authority) realm schemes Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Essential for informing open space design standards across Bromley by Bow Estate the LCS neighbourhoods Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Estate Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Essential for designing changes to the core parkland and for Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Parkland Parkland outside LLDC parkland informing ongoing maintenance LLDC Planning Authority Motorway Borough boundaries Transport Links Parkland outside LLDC Recommended for guiding public realm design management improvements in these areas QUEEN ELIZABETH OLYMPIC PARK DESIGN GUIDE 5 USER GUIDE OVERVIEW GENERAL APPLICATION PROCESS The Guide, alongside the Park Management 1. Designers and project managers are to DESIGNER / LLDC QUALITY REVIEW PANEL Plan, should be used to inform design review the Park Design Guidance materials APPLICANT PROCESS decisions on the Park, Estate and wider areas palette to justify the use of materials being Comprising a range of built environment This guidance (current planning area). In some cases other considered. experts, the panel has been set up to supports the process guides may be applicable such as the Canal support the Planning Authority with external for submitting and Park or Lea River Park Design Manual. professional input to ensure high quality design reviewing design throughout the design process. 2. A discussion with an LLDC Design Advisor applications through Designers are expected to utilise the should be organised, which could form part the planning system guidance set out in this document to justify Any project can be brought forward by LLDC of a pre-planning application with an LLDC Design the decision making process and the selected for review and it is recommended that this Advisor, depending material palette. Where alternative design occurs at an early stage of design to ensure on the nature of the approaches are suggested by a third party recommended changes can be incorporated proposal. designer, reasons for deviating from the effectively. 3. An application is submitted. standards set out in this guidance should be Specific products agreed with LLDC. At an early stage (RIBA 1/2), the panel meets may be agreed for for a design workshop focusing on strategic implementation on Depending on area of application, decisions and initial design matters including 4. Applicants may be required to attend a trial basis to test recommendations should not be seen as a accessibility requirements. and/or present at an LLDC Quality Review the suitability of the prescriptive set of rules, but rather as best Panel meeting where the proposal will be product before Park- practice design parameters that still allow for From RIBA Stage 3, a formal Design Review further assessed. wide roll-out. some flexibility and individuality in designs process is undertaken to provide technical coming forward. These parameters are advice to the client and concentrate on issues For projects on the needed to ensure a lasting coherence for the that do not meet an acceptable standard. A 5. Applicants will be informed of the Park the process design aesthetic of the area as a whole. Quality Review Panel meeting may take place outcome of their proposal within should begin with a at application stage to ensure that suitable appropriate timescale of the review review of the long The document is intended to be a live report changes have been made to a proposal. meeting. term sustainability and will need periodic review. and management It is recommended that panel members objectives. The document should also be read are briefed with this design guide, before alongside LLDC’s Inclusive Design Standards 6. Implementation of proposals. participating on the panel. Stakeholder which focuses on recommendations to and community create genuinely inclusive and accessible OTHER PANELS engagement should be environments for all Park users. embedded within the ■ Built Environment and Access Panel (BEAP) 7. Monitoring and post-installation process. It must be recognised that the guidance set inspection. ■ Legacy Youth Voice out in this document cannot replace the expert advice of LLDC professionals. ■ Park Panel 6 QUEEN ELIZABETH OLYMPIC PARK DESIGN GUIDE
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Making of an Evangelical Tory: the Seventh Earl of Shaftesbury (1801-1885) and the Evolving Character of Victorian Evangelicalism
    The Making of an Evangelical Tory: The Seventh Earl of Shaftesbury (1801-1885) and the Evolving Character of Victorian Evangelicalism David Andrew Barton Furse-Roberts A thesis in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy UNSW School of Humanities & Languages Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences November 2015 CONTENTS Page Abstract i Abbreviations ii Acknowledgements iii Introduction I Part I: Locating Anthony Ashley Cooper within the Anglican Evangelical tradition 1 1.1 Ashley’s expression of Evangelicalism 2 1.2 How the associations and leaders of Anglican Evangelicalism shaped the evolving 32 religious temperament of Ashley. 1.3 Conclusion: A son of the Clapham Sect or a brother of the Recordites? 64 Part II: A just estimate of rank and property: Locating Ashley’s place within the 67 tradition of paternalism 2.1 Identifying the character of Ashley’s paternalism 68 2.2 How Tory paternalist ideas influenced the emerging consciousness of Ashley in the 88 pre-Victorian era 2.3 The place of Ashley’s paternalism within the British Tory and Whig traditions 132 2.4 Conclusion: Paternalism in the ‘name of the people’ 144 Part III: Something admirably patrician in his estimation of Christianity: Ashley 147 and the emerging synthesis between Evangelicalism and Tory paternalism 3.1 Common ground forged between Tory paternalism and early Victorian Evangelicalism 148 3.2 Ashley and the factory reform movement: Project of Tory paternalism or 203 by-product of Evangelical social concern? 3.3 The coalescence of these two belief systems in the emerging political philosophy of 230 Ashley 3.4 Conclusion: Making Evangelicalism a patrician creed 237 Part IV: Ashley and the milieux of Victorian Evangelicalism 240 4.1 Locating Ashley’s place within the Victorian Evangelical Terrain 242 4.2 Thy kingdom come, thy will be done: The premillennial eschatology and 255 Evangelical activism of Ashley 4.3 Desire for the nations: Ashley and Victorian Evangelical attitudes to imperialism, 264 race and the ‘Jewish question’.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Pennsylvania History a journal of mid-atlantic studies PHvolume 79, number 2 · spring 2012 Articles “What Must Poor People Do?”: Economic Protest and Plebeian Culture in Philadelphia, 1682–1754 Daniel Johnson 117 James Wilson—His Scottish Background: Corrections and Additions Martin Clagett 154 The Public Interest of the Private City: The Pennsylvania Railroad, Urban Space, and Philadelphia’s Economic Elite, 1846–1877 Andrew Heath 177 Engaging the Trope of Redemptive Suffering: Inmate Voices in the Antebellum Prison Debates Jennifer Graber 209 review essAys The “Mighty Macs”: Women’s Basketball in Chester County Karen Guenther 234 Henry Ossawa Tanner: Modern Spirit Exhibition, Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Arts, Philadelphia Alexia I. Hudson 238 This content downloaded from 128.118.152.206 on Wed, 14 Mar 2018 15:38:31 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms PAH 79.2_FM.indd 1 18/04/12 1:01 AM book reviews John Fea. Was America Founded as a Christian Nation? A Historical Introduction Reviewed by Robert Shaffer 249 Beverly C. Tomek. Colonization and Its Discontents: Emancipation, Emigration, and Antislavery in Antebellum Pennsylvania Reviewed by Nicholas Wood 252 contributors 255 This content downloaded from 128.118.152.206 on Wed, 14 Mar 2018 15:38:31 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms PAH 79.2_FM.indd 2 18/04/12 1:01 AM submission information Pennsylvania History publishes documents previously unpublished and of interest to scholars of the Middle Atlantic region. The Journal also reviews books, exhibits, and other media dealing primarily with Pennsylvania history or that shed significant light on the state’s past.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lea Valley Walk
    THE LEA VALLEY WALK LEAGRAVE TO THE HEART OF LONDON by Leigh Hatts JUNIPER HOUSE, MURLEY MOSS, OXENHOLME ROAD, KENDAL, CUMBRIA LA9 7RL www.cicerone.co.uk 774 Lea Valley text 2020 3rd Ed Rpt.indd 3 28/09/2020 14:52 © Leigh Hatts 2015 Third edition 2015 ISBN 978 1 85284 774 6 Reprinted 2020 (with updates) Second edition 2007 First edition 2001 Printed in Singapore by KHL using responsibly sourced paper. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. All photographs are by the author unless otherwise stated. This product includes mapping data licensed from Ordnance Survey® with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. © Crown copyright 2015. All rights reserved. Licence number PU100012932. Updates to this Guide While every effort is made by our authors to ensure the accuracy of guidebooks as they go to print, changes can occur during the lifetime of an edition. Any updates that we know of for this guide will be on the Cicerone website (www.cicerone.co.uk/774/updates), so please check before planning your trip. We also advise that you check information about such things as transport, accommodation and shops locally. Even rights of way can be altered over time. We are always grateful for information about any discrepancies between a guidebook and the facts on the ground, sent by email to [email protected] or by post to Cicerone, Juniper House, Murley Moss, Oxenholme Road, Kendal, LA9 7RL. Register your book: To sign up to receive free updates, special offers and GPX files where available, register your book at www.cicerone.co.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • London Explorer Pass List of Attractions
    London Explorer Pass List of Attractions Tower of London Uber Boat by Thames Clippers 1-day River Roamer Tower Bridge St Paul’s Cathedral 1-Day hop-on, hop-off bus tour The View from the Shard London Zoo Kew Gardens Shakespeare’s Globe Theatre Tour Westminster Abbey Kensington Palace Windsor Palace Royal Observatory Greenwich Cutty Sark Old Royal Naval College The Queen’s Gallery Chelsea FC Stadium Tour Hampton Court Palace Household Cavalry Museum London Transport Museum Jewel Tower Wellington Arch Jason’s Original Canal Boat Trip ArcelorMittal Orbit Beefeater Gin Distillery Tour Namco Funscape London Bicycle Hire Charles Dickens Museum Brit Movie Tours Royal Museums Greenwich Apsley House Benjamin Franklin House Queen’s Skate Dine Bowl Curzon Bloomsbury Curzon Mayfair Cinema Curzon Cinema Soho Museum of London Southwark Cathedral Handel and Hendrix London Freud Museum London The Postal Museum Chelsea Physic Garden Museum of Brands, Packaging and Advertising Pollock’s Toy Museum Twickenham Stadium Tour and World Rugby Museum Twickenham Stadium World Rugby Museum Cartoon Museum The Foundling Museum Royal Air Force Museum London London Canal Museum London Stadium Tour Guildhall Art Gallery Keats House Estorick Collection of Modern Italian Art Museum of London Docklands National Army Museum London Top Sights Tour (30+) Palaces and Parliament – Top Sights Tour The Garden Museum London Museum of Water and Steam Emirates Stadium Tour- Arsenal FC Florence Nightingale Museum Fan Museum The Kia Oval Tour Science Museum IMAX London Bicycle Tour London Bridge Experience Royal Albert Hall Tour The Monument to the Great Fire of London Golden Hinde Wembley Stadium Tour The Guards Museum BAPS Shri Swaminarayan Mandir Wernher Collection at Ranger’s House Eltham Palace British Museum VOX Audio Guide .
    [Show full text]
  • How Do You Lose a River?
    Number 1,1, SpringSummer 2016 2015 Waypoints 1 How do you lose a river? In this paper I explore the concept of the lost river and the implications this Jonathan Gardner term has for our understanding of the history of changing urban environ- jonathan.gardner@ucl. ments. ac.uk In taking a voyage down one of the London 2012 Olympic Park’s now-filled waterways, the Pudding Mill River, charting it and the surrounding area’s diverse history, I explore how rivers end up becoming losable. Drawing on diverse methodologies from archaeology and geography and with a particular emphasis on mapping, I argue that a literal and metaphorical exploration of such a rapidly changing environment reveals a multitude of buried narratives and fluid histories. This research suggests that the labeling of a river as lost is not a politically neutral act and that, with its romantic connotations, the term may actually serve to legitimise insensitive and contentious changes to our environment. Much has been written about London’s numerous lost watercourses over the years, most notably Nicho- las Barton’s seminal volume The Lost Rivers of London [1] and more, recently Paul Talling’s London’s Lost Riv- ers [2] and Tom Bolton’s London’s Lost Rivers: A Walker’s Guide [3]. In addition to these works a large range of blogs and websites devoted to the lost rivers are continually created and updated, for example, Diamond Geezer 2015 [4]. The subject is one that seems to inspire intense interest amongst a wide range of people and would suggest that city-dwellers are curiously attracted to such forgotten or lost spaces, and in particular, the unusual juxtaposition of the natural and the urban these watercourses seem to present.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossrail Act 2008 Page 1
    Crossrail Act 2008 Page 1 Crossrail Act 2008 2008 CHAPTER 18 Thomson Reuters (Legal) Limited. UK Statutes Crown Copyright. Reproduced by permission of the Controller of Her Majesty©s Stationery Of®ce. An Act to make provision for a railway transport system running from Maidenhead, in the County of Berkshire, and Heathrow Airport, in the London Borough of Hillingdon, through central London to Shen®eld, in the County of Essex, and Abbey Wood, in the London Borough of Greenwich; and for connected purposes. [22nd July 2008] BE IT ENACTED by the Queen©s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:± Extent Preamble: England, Wales, Scotland Works Law In Force 1 Construction and maintenance of scheduled works (1) The nominated undertaker may construct and maintain the works speci®ed in Schedule 1 (ªthe scheduled worksº), being± (a) works for the construction of an underground railway between, in the west, a tunnel portal at Royal Oak in the City of Westminster and, in the east, tunnel portals at Custom House and Pudding Mill Lane in the London Borough of Newham, (b) works for the construction of other railways in the London Boroughs of Barking & Dagenham, Bexley, Ealing, Greenwich, Hammersmith and Fulham, Havering, Hillingdon, Newham, Redbridge and Tower Hamlets, the City of Westminster, the Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea, the District of Basildon and the Borough of Brentwood in the County of Essex, the Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead and the Borough of Slough in the County of Berkshire and the District of South Bucks in the County of Buckinghamshire, (c) works consequent on, or incidental to, the construction of the works mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b).
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Heatherwick, Architecture's Showman
    Thomas Heatherwick, Architecture’s Showman His giant new structure aims to be an Eiffel Tower for New York. Is it genius or folly? February 26, 2018 | By IAN PARKER Stephen Ross, the seventy-seven-year-old billionaire property developer and the owner of the Miami Dolphins, has a winningly informal, old-school conversational style. On a recent morning in Manhattan, he spoke of the moment, several years ago, when he decided that the plaza of one of his projects, Hudson Yards—a Doha-like cluster of towers on Manhattan’s West Side—needed a magnificent object at its center. He recalled telling him- self, “It has to be big. It has to be monumental.” He went on, “Then I said, ‘O.K. Who are the great sculptors?’ ” (Ross pronounced the word “sculptures.”) Before long, he met with Thomas Heatherwick, the acclaimed British designer of ingenious, if sometimes unworkable, things. Ross told me that there was a presentation, and that he was very impressed by Heatherwick’s “what do you call it—Television? Internet?” An adviser softly said, “PowerPoint?” Ross was in a meeting room at the Time Warner Center, which his company, Related, built and partly owns, and where he lives and works. We had a view of Columbus Circle and Central Park. The room was filled with models of Hudson Yards, which is a mile and a half southwest, between Thirtieth and Thirty-third Streets, and between Tenth Avenue and the West Side Highway. There, Related and its partner, Oxford Properties Group, are partway through erecting the complex, which includes residential space, office space, and a mall—with such stores as Neiman Marcus, Cartier, and Urban Decay, and a Thomas Keller restaurant designed to evoke “Mad Men”—most of it on a platform built over active rail lines.
    [Show full text]
  • Central London Bus and Walking Map Key Bus Routes in Central London
    General A3 Leaflet v2 23/07/2015 10:49 Page 1 Transport for London Central London bus and walking map Key bus routes in central London Stoke West 139 24 C2 390 43 Hampstead to Hampstead Heath to Parliament to Archway to Newington Ways to pay 23 Hill Fields Friern 73 Westbourne Barnet Newington Kentish Green Dalston Clapton Park Abbey Road Camden Lock Pond Market Town York Way Junction The Zoo Agar Grove Caledonian Buses do not accept cash. Please use Road Mildmay Hackney 38 Camden Park Central your contactless debit or credit card Ladbroke Grove ZSL Camden Town Road SainsburyÕs LordÕs Cricket London Ground Zoo Essex Road or Oyster. Contactless is the same fare Lisson Grove Albany Street for The Zoo Mornington 274 Islington Angel as Oyster. Ladbroke Grove Sherlock London Holmes RegentÕs Park Crescent Canal Museum Museum You can top up your Oyster pay as Westbourne Grove Madame St John KingÕs TussaudÕs Street Bethnal 8 to Bow you go credit or buy Travelcards and Euston Cross SadlerÕs Wells Old Street Church 205 Telecom Theatre Green bus & tram passes at around 4,000 Marylebone Tower 14 Charles Dickens Old Ford Paddington Museum shops across London. For the locations Great Warren Street 10 Barbican Shoreditch 453 74 Baker Street and and Euston Square St Pancras Portland International 59 Centre High Street of these, please visit Gloucester Place Street Edgware Road Moorgate 11 PollockÕs 188 TheobaldÕs 23 tfl.gov.uk/ticketstopfinder Toy Museum 159 Russell Road Marble Museum Goodge Street Square For live travel updates, follow us on Arch British
    [Show full text]
  • How to Find Us Garfield House, 86-88 Edgware Road, London W2 2EA
    How to find us etc.venues Marble Arch is located on Edgware Road in the heart of the West End. By underground Central line to Marble Arch Station – when you exit the station, turn right on to Oxford Street and then right again on to Edgware Road walking past the Odeon Cinema. etc.venues Garfield House, 86-88 Edgware Road, London W2 2EA Marble Arch is in Garfield House, on the right hand side next to the Tescos. Tel: 020 7793 4200 Fax: 020 7793 4201 By train Email: [email protected] Paddington station is approximately 20 minutes walk. Use the Praed Street exit and turn left on Sat nav: 51.51542, -0.163319 to Praed Street and continue until you walk on to Edgware Road. Turn right onto Edgware Road and continue towards Marble Arch. GLO etc.venues Marble Arch is at the other end of A5 T S Y B Edgware Road on the left. Alternatively bus W B U R O CEST R R O routes 36 or 436 go from outside Paddington A W H N Garfield House on Praed Street and on to Edgware Road and S E T E ST R P 86-88 Edgware Road take approximately 10 minutes to Marble Arch. O RG GE London W2 2EA L G ACE EDG REAT By bus S TESCOTESCO EYMOU WAR etc.venues Marble Arch sits on many bus METROMETRO CU Y ST A41 KELE routes including 7, 10, 73, 98, 137, 390, 6, 23, E M E R R B BERL P E R 94, 159, 30, 94, 113, 159, 274, 2, 16, 36, 74, U P P RD L ACE 82, 148, 414, 436 AN 4 D A520 PL G H T ST Parking R A ST CONNAU M OU CE There is a NCP car park situated within close S EY proximity to Marble Arch - visit www.ncp.co.uk A5 ODEANODEAN MARBLEMARBLE MARBLEMARBLE ARCHARCH for more details.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Greek Myth and Drama in Greek Cinema (1930–2012): an Overall Approach
    Konstantinos KyriaKos ANCIENT GREEK MYTH AND DRAMA IN GREEK CINEMA (1930–2012): AN OVERALL APPROACH Ι. Introduction he purpose of the present article is to outline the relationship between TGreek cinema and themes from Ancient Greek mythology, in a period stretching from 1930 to 2012. This discourse is initiated by examining mov- ies dated before WW II (Prometheus Bound, 1930, Dimitris Meravidis)1 till recent important ones such as Strella. A Woman’s Way (2009, Panos Ch. Koutras).2 Moreover, movies involving ancient drama adaptations are co-ex- amined with the ones referring to ancient mythology in general. This is due to a particularity of the perception of ancient drama by script writers and di- rectors of Greek cinema: in ancient tragedy and comedy film adaptations,3 ancient drama was typically employed as a source for myth. * I wish to express my gratitude to S. Tsitsiridis, A. Marinis and G. Sakallieros for their succinct remarks upon this article. 1. The ideologically interesting endeavours — expressed through filming the Delphic Cel- ebrations Prometheus Bound by Eva Palmer-Sikelianos and Angelos Sikelianos (1930, Dimitris Meravidis) and the Longus romance in Daphnis and Chloë (1931, Orestis Laskos) — belong to the origins of Greek cinema. What the viewers behold, in the first fiction film of the Greek Cinema (The Adventures of Villar, 1924, Joseph Hepp), is a wedding reception at the hill of Acropolis. Then, during the interwar period, film pro- duction comprises of documentaries depicting the “Celebrations of the Third Greek Civilisation”, romances from late antiquity (where the beauty of the lovers refers to An- cient Greek statues), and, finally, the first filmings of a theatrical performance, Del- phic Celebrations.
    [Show full text]
  • Arcelormittal ORBIT
    ArcelorMittal ORBIT Like many parents we try pathetically With the help of a panel of experts, to improve our kids by taking them to including Nick Serota and Julia Peyton- see the big exhibitions. We have trooped Jones, we eventually settled on Anish. through the Aztecs and Hockney and He has taken the idea of a tower, and Rembrandt – and yet of all the shows transformed it into a piece of modern we have seen there is only one that really British art. seemed to fire them up. It would have boggled the minds of the I remember listening in astonishment as Romans. It would have boggled Gustave they sat there at lunch, like a bunch of Eiffel. I believe it will be worthy of art critics, debating the intentions of the London’s Olympic and Paralympic Games, artist and the meaning of the works, and worthy of the greatest city on earth. but agreeing on one point: that these In helping us to get to this stage, were objects of sensational beauty. I especially want to thank David McAlpine That is the impact of Anish Kapoor on and Philip Dilley of Arup, and everyone Our ambition is to turn the young minds, and not just on young at the GLA, ODA and LOCOG. I am Stratford site into a place of minds. His show at the Royal Academy grateful to Tessa and also to Sir Robin destination, a must-see item on broke all records, with hundreds of Wales and Jules Pipe for their the tourist itinerary – and we thousands of people paying £12 to see encouragement and support.
    [Show full text]
  • The Art of the Possible the Arcelormittal Orbit, Collective Memory, and Ecological Survival
    The Art of the Possible The ArcelorMittal Orbit, collective memory, and ecological survival David Cross [For ‘Regeneration Songs: Sounds of Opportunity and Loss in East London’ Edited by Alberto Duman, Anna Minton, Dan Hancox and Malcolm James London: Repeater Books, September 2018] As the 2012 London Olympics have long since passed from anticipation through lived experience into history, or at least memory, I decided at last to ‘experience’ the ArcelorMittal Orbit in its physical setting. Emerging from Stratford tube station, I tried to reach the Olympic Park without passing through Westfield, Europe’s largest shopping centre. But the pedestrian walkway petered out in a banal and featureless non-place; with no viable way forward, I had to concede, and return to the main concourse. Surrounded by surveillance cameras, I felt self-conscious and began to suspect myself of having criminal thoughts. But with my field of vision dominated by a brilliant screen playing fragments of a disaster movie, interspersed with an advertisement for dairy milk chocolate, it was easy to be distracted. Framed by an avenue of retail façades, my first glimpse of the ArcelorMittal Orbit had the quality of a computer-generated image, a silhouette shimmering faintly in the polluted London air. Having found my bearings, I decided to relax and ‘go with the flow’, allowing my movement to be governed by the urban form. I wandered through the corporate branded environment, a ‘forest of signs’ enjoining me to “Explore, Discover, Experience, Share, Indulge, and Eat”. I went into a stylish boutique café with a ceiling of beaten copper and a display counter of authentic-looking wooden fruit packing crates, where I was served an organic fairtrade coffee and a delicious pain au chocolat, heated and handed to me in a recycled paper bag by someone who seemed so bored or exhausted that they were almost gone.
    [Show full text]