Carpenters Road Lock Heritage from the Shadow of the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Carpenters Road Lock Heritage from the Shadow of the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Carpenters Road Lock Heritage from the shadow of the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Conservation Management Plan Florence Salberter Heritage Adviser Canal & River Trust May 2015 CONTENT 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Purpose and scope of the document 1.2 Authorship 2.0 Understanding the historic asset 2.1 Historic context: a changing waterscape 2.2 Carpenters Road Lock: Why the lock was built and how it works 2.2.1 A unique lock design 2.2.2 A 1930s project 2.2.3 Dual function: Flood protection and navigation 2.2.4 Hygienic improvement 2.3 The Olympics’ legacy and the lock restoration 2.3.1 Abandoned waterways: how the lock fell into disrepair and is being recovered as part of the Olympics’ Legacy 2.3.2 Parallels between Olympics led regeneration today and the regeneration scheme of the 1930s depression 3.0 Statement of Significance and conservation principles 3.1 A lock with dual functions in response to local conditions 3.2 Conservation principles 4.0 Vulnerability and Risks 4.1 Threats to the heritage 4.1.1 Funding shortage 4.1.2 Inappropriate design intervention 4.1.3 Lack of maintenance 4.2 Interpretation 4.2.1 Content quality 4.2.2 Design and Vandalism 4.2.3 Sharing of information 5.0 Conservation Management aims and objectives 5.1 Broad aims and objectives for safeguarding heritage significance 5.1.1 The Lock 5.1.2 Interpretation 5.2 Environmental Appraisal 5.3 Stakeholders’ engagement Carpenters Road Lock Conservation Plan Page 2 of 20 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose and Scope of the document This Conservation Management Plan has been prepared by the Canal & River Trust to support the second phase of the HLF Heritage Grant application to restore and interpret Carpenters Road Lock. This document briefly identifies the heritage, its significance and any risks to it. It supports the choices that have been made for the restoration, design and interpretation themes. The Canal & River Trust is a recently established charity (July 2012) set up to care for England and Wales’ 200 year old waterways. The Trust is among the UK’s biggest charities, with responsibility for 2,000 miles of canals, rivers, docks and reservoirs, along with museums, archives and the country’s third largest collection of protected historic buildings. In East London, the Trust works in partnership with a whole host of stakeholders, government agencies, businesses and local communities to develop a new model for the management and stewardship of the canals, rivers and docks – one which we hope can be heralded as a model for creating an active, vibrant and truly sustainable place for people, wildlife and enterprise. 1.2 Authorship This Statement has been prepared by Florence Salberter, heritage adviser at Canal & River Trust (MA, MSc, IHBC). Florence has been working for the organisation for over eight years and was responsible for ensuring the historic environment was given due considerations in anticipation of the Games and for sourcing and researching archives. She commissioned the report on the lock carried out by Pre-Construct Archaeology (PCA) and also liaised with English Heritage/Historic England, the Inland Waterways Association (IWA) and the Greater London Industrial Archaeology Society (GLIAS) as well as provided support to the team throughout the development of this project. The sources consulted for this Conservation Plan in particular were: Heritage Assessment of the mechanical and electrical elements of carpenters road lock, 2010, Pre-Construct Archaeology. By River, Fields and Factories; Powell Andrew. The Making of the Lower Lea Valley. The Olympic Park, Waterways and associated built heritage structures: Carpenters Lock, City Mill River Footbridge, Pudding Mill Lock, Old Ford Locks, Old Ford Lock houses, Marshgate Lane Lock, Stone and Brick Riverbank Walls, Pudding Mill River, 2008, MoLA-PCA. Carpenters Road Lock Conservation Plan Page 3 of 20 2.0 UNDERSTANDING THE HISTORIC ASSET 2.1 Historic context: a changing waterscape The Bow Back Rivers and the Lea Navigation have a very rich history that has contributed to shaping the area but is not widely known. The River Lea goes back to prehistoric times but the first documentary evidence for use of the river occurs in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle where it relates that in 894 the Danes of Mersea rowed their ships up the Thames and the Lea. The 1086 Domesday survey records at least eight tidal watermills on the tributaries of the River Lea, used for various manufacturing processes. Some of these former mills can be identified in the names still in use today in the area: Pudding Mill, City Mill, Waterworks Mill, Abbey Mill and Three Mills. Beyond the banks and channels, the land would have been used for arable and reed cultivation and animal husbandry. During the 14th century Edward III encouraged the expansion of manufacturing on the lower Lea. These industries included soap making, printing, paper making, gun powder manufacture, flour milling, distilling, linen and silk weaving, tanning and the manufacture of porcelain. While the navigation was used for carrying various materials including coal and timber, malt and grain for beer and bread making, copper ingots, gunpowder and armaments. The River Lea was the first, in 1424 of any rivers in the British Isles to benefit from an Act for navigational improvement. Conflicts were common between the various users. Fisheries and water mills required weirs which penned the water to help them function efficiently. The bargemen required an uninterrupted waterway to achieve a profitable fast passage. It took many years of disputes to achieve a workable, though sometimes fragile, compromise. In addition, from the 17th century, the New River Company required supplies to enable them to provide London with drinking water. West Ham Council and the Lee Conservancy Board submitted a joint Parliamentary Bill in 1930 for the River Lee (Flood Relief) Act. The works proposed in the bill were “to prevent and minimise the risk of flooding in the area, to improve hygienic conditions and to render the waterways navigable at all states of the tide”. The bill went on to proclaim: “In addition it is considered that an all-round improvement of the district generally should result in consequence of the execution of the works.” The works included the widening and re-routing of various waterways, two new locks (City Mill and Carpenters Road Lock) to allow access from the tidal Waterworks River, the demolition and re-location of houses and the creation of wharves to tempt new industry to the area. A lifting sluice gate was also built into Prescott Channel which enabled to control the amount of water flowing through this new channel, as this was diverting water from the House Mill. Carpenters Road Lock Conservation Plan Page 4 of 20 Extract from the ‘official opening of river improvement works’ leaflet, 1935 Unfortunately the hoped-for boom never came and the Bow Back Rivers area gradually deteriorated. In the second half of the 20th century, the Bow Back Rivers were categorised as Remainder Waterways and both locks became unusable, with the last passage by boat through Carpenters Road Lock recorded in the 1960s. The advent of the Olympics saw major works invigorating new life into these waterways with City Mill lock being brought back to full automated use, a new lock on Prescott Channel being built along with a weir and fish pass, and waterway walls being repaired throughout. The new lock, Three Mills Lock and associated sluice on Three Mills Wall are now controlling tidal waters influx as well as the fluvial level which enable to control the water level within the Bow Back Rivers. Carpenters Road Lock Conservation Plan Page 5 of 20 Over the years and especially in the 20th century, with the decline of heavy polluting industries and the recent clean up and installation of eel passes, the water level quality has improved. Extensive research techniques including geotechnical boreholes, palaeoenvironmental study, archaeological investigations, built heritage survey, documentary and cartographic research, and oral history recording have been used to understand the development and historical context of the area that sustained major transformation to receive ‘The 2012 Olympics’. This has provided a large amount of data and information and a greater understanding of the Lea’s river system and tributaries, their relationship with the floodplains as well as the relationship between landscape, river and settlement. It has demonstrated how the environment has influenced former land and water courses usage and how these have in turn shaped developments through the ages. Little of these findings are available to visitors of the Park and the restoration of Carpenters Road Lock given its position and role within the Park, offers the opportunity to act as a catalyst and be the place where some of these stories will be shared with visitors and participants. 2.2 Carpenters Road Lock: Why the lock was built and how it works 2.2.1 A unique lock design Carpenters Road Lock had double radial gates lifted or lowered by an innovative operating mechanism mounted on overhead gantries. One of these gantries was also carrying the towpath over to the other side. The gear comprised a substantial centrally located manually operated enclosed epicyclic gearbox which drove two output shafts, one on either side. Each shaft drove a pair of couples winding barrels at either end of the gantry that respectively raised/lowered the gates and counterweights. This system enabled the gates to be operated at different speed and although those planetary gearing were not new it would appear that their use to operate lock gate might have been a first in the UK. The lock was the only one on the Lee Navigation to be fitted with rising radial gates, a type of lifting gate used on the Continent.
Recommended publications
  • Sugar House Lane Conservation Area Character Appraisal and Management Proposals January 2010
    Sugar House Lane Conservation Area Character Appraisal and Management Proposals January 2010 London Borough of Newham CONTENTS PART 1: CONSERVATION AREA CHARACTER APPRAISAL Introduction……………………………………………………………………………..2 The Planning Context……………………………………………………………….....4 Summary of Special Interest……………………………………………………….....6 Location and Context……………………………………………………………….....7 Topography and Landscape Setting… …………………………………………......7 Geology……………………………………...……………………………………........7 Historical Development…………………………………………………...................8 Townscape Analysis………………………………………………………………….12 Analysis of Key Buildings and Spaces………….………………………………….16 Negative Features and Issues………………………………………………………25 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………...…..26 PART 2: CONSERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN A Vision for Sugar House Lane……………………..……….………………………27 Future Development…………………………………………………………………..28 Planning Controls……………………………………………………………………..29 Council Functions………………………………………..……………………………29 Enhancement and Funding…………………………………………………………..30 Community Engagement…………………………………………………………… 30 Public Realm……………………………………………………………….……….....30 Boundary Review……………………………………………………………………...31 Public Consultation and Monitoring…………………………………………….…...31 MAPS Sugar House Lane Conservation Area Boundary…………………………………..3 John Roque 1745………………………………………………………………………8 Ordnance Survey 1867………………………………………………………………..9 Ordnance Survey 1894…....................................................................................10 Views to and from Sugar House Lane………………………………………………13 Analysis
    [Show full text]
  • The Lea Valley Walk
    THE LEA VALLEY WALK LEAGRAVE TO THE HEART OF LONDON by Leigh Hatts JUNIPER HOUSE, MURLEY MOSS, OXENHOLME ROAD, KENDAL, CUMBRIA LA9 7RL www.cicerone.co.uk 774 Lea Valley text 2020 3rd Ed Rpt.indd 3 28/09/2020 14:52 © Leigh Hatts 2015 Third edition 2015 ISBN 978 1 85284 774 6 Reprinted 2020 (with updates) Second edition 2007 First edition 2001 Printed in Singapore by KHL using responsibly sourced paper. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. All photographs are by the author unless otherwise stated. This product includes mapping data licensed from Ordnance Survey® with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. © Crown copyright 2015. All rights reserved. Licence number PU100012932. Updates to this Guide While every effort is made by our authors to ensure the accuracy of guidebooks as they go to print, changes can occur during the lifetime of an edition. Any updates that we know of for this guide will be on the Cicerone website (www.cicerone.co.uk/774/updates), so please check before planning your trip. We also advise that you check information about such things as transport, accommodation and shops locally. Even rights of way can be altered over time. We are always grateful for information about any discrepancies between a guidebook and the facts on the ground, sent by email to [email protected] or by post to Cicerone, Juniper House, Murley Moss, Oxenholme Road, Kendal, LA9 7RL. Register your book: To sign up to receive free updates, special offers and GPX files where available, register your book at www.cicerone.co.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Report 2017–19
    Heritage Report 2017–19 September 2019 Dundas Aqueduct 2 Heritage Report 2017–19 Case Studies The following case studies are included in the Report: Managing our heritage Restoring a bridge-keeper’s hut, River Weaver 8 Derwent Mouth Lock repairs, Trent & Mersey Canal 9 Foxton Locks re-gating, Grand Union Leicester Line 10 Traffic lights at Golden Nook Bridge, Shropshire Union Canal 11 Safety railings at Marple Aqueduct, Peak Forest Canal 12 Cookley Forge Basin Bridge, Staffordshire & Worcestershire Canal 13 Repairs to Chirk Aqueduct, Llangollen Canal 14 Marple Yard cottages refurbished, Macclesfield Canal 16 Carpenter’s Road Lock restoration, Bow Back Rivers 17 Parapet repairs to Bedford Street Bridge, Caldon Canal 18 Repairs to Saint Thomas Bridge, Staffordshire & Worcestershire Canal 19 Curdworth Bridge repairs, Birmingham & Fazeley Canal 20 Towpath widening, Edgbaston Tunnel, Worcester & Birmingham Canal 21 Maintaining high standards Drone survey, Engine Arm Aqueduct, Birmingham New Main Line Canal 25 Repairs to Roundthorn Bridge, Llangollen Canal 26 Parapet alterations to Beeston Iron Lock footbridge, Shropshire Union Canal 27 Fox’s Malthouse revived, Gloucester Docks 28 Soulbury Pump House restored, Grand Union Canal 29 Heritage Apprentices, Monmouthshire & Brecon Canal, Wales 30 Surveying the old Line of the Oxford Canal 32 Recording Beeston and Bunbury locks, Shropshire Union Canal 33 Metal detectorists, Grand Union Aylesbury Arm 34 British Transport Commission sign recovered 34 Engagement Cataloguing wooden patterns at Ellesmere
    [Show full text]
  • Take a Fresh Look at the Parks, Waterways and Heritage Around Bow and the Olympic Park
    Take a fresh look at the parks, waterways and heritage around Bow and the Olympic Park A self-guided walk inspired by the ‘Photos from the Footpath’ project DiscoverBow Looking afresh at the neighbourhood When dashing about day to day, it’s easy to miss the many interesting sights close to home. On the ‘Photos from the Footpath’ project, 45 local residents joined together on a series of walks. We used photography to look afresh at the parks, 1 Set o! from Mile End crossroads waterways, streets and landmarks in and around Bow. And stories from local history helped put the neighbourhood in context. Our walk begins on top of the Green Bridge – a millennium project to carry Mile End Park high above the tra"c. Here there’s Head out on this walk and, like us, you can discover tranquil a bird’s-eye view of High Street 2012, red-brick Guardian Angels, canals, taste smoked salmon on Fish Island, witness the latest and the Gherkin beyond. There are spectacular skylines too from Olympic developments, peer behind-the-scenes at the House Mill, the top of the mound, created in the footprint of the New Globe and explore the Cemetery Park’s wild charms. Tavern pleasure gardens. ‘Photos from the Footpath’ was lead by Graham Barker at Walk East and Natalie Clarke at The Photo School. There are oodles of other photos from the project at www.blurb.com/user/njc109. We’d love to hear your feedback, please get in touch at [email protected] With thanks to our walking photographers Howard Baker, Sharon Bench, Michael Benn, Terri Bennett, Monica Blake, Bryony
    [Show full text]
  • How Do You Lose a River?
    Number 1,1, SpringSummer 2016 2015 Waypoints 1 How do you lose a river? In this paper I explore the concept of the lost river and the implications this Jonathan Gardner term has for our understanding of the history of changing urban environ- jonathan.gardner@ucl. ments. ac.uk In taking a voyage down one of the London 2012 Olympic Park’s now-filled waterways, the Pudding Mill River, charting it and the surrounding area’s diverse history, I explore how rivers end up becoming losable. Drawing on diverse methodologies from archaeology and geography and with a particular emphasis on mapping, I argue that a literal and metaphorical exploration of such a rapidly changing environment reveals a multitude of buried narratives and fluid histories. This research suggests that the labeling of a river as lost is not a politically neutral act and that, with its romantic connotations, the term may actually serve to legitimise insensitive and contentious changes to our environment. Much has been written about London’s numerous lost watercourses over the years, most notably Nicho- las Barton’s seminal volume The Lost Rivers of London [1] and more, recently Paul Talling’s London’s Lost Riv- ers [2] and Tom Bolton’s London’s Lost Rivers: A Walker’s Guide [3]. In addition to these works a large range of blogs and websites devoted to the lost rivers are continually created and updated, for example, Diamond Geezer 2015 [4]. The subject is one that seems to inspire intense interest amongst a wide range of people and would suggest that city-dwellers are curiously attracted to such forgotten or lost spaces, and in particular, the unusual juxtaposition of the natural and the urban these watercourses seem to present.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossrail Act 2008 Page 1
    Crossrail Act 2008 Page 1 Crossrail Act 2008 2008 CHAPTER 18 Thomson Reuters (Legal) Limited. UK Statutes Crown Copyright. Reproduced by permission of the Controller of Her Majesty©s Stationery Of®ce. An Act to make provision for a railway transport system running from Maidenhead, in the County of Berkshire, and Heathrow Airport, in the London Borough of Hillingdon, through central London to Shen®eld, in the County of Essex, and Abbey Wood, in the London Borough of Greenwich; and for connected purposes. [22nd July 2008] BE IT ENACTED by the Queen©s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:± Extent Preamble: England, Wales, Scotland Works Law In Force 1 Construction and maintenance of scheduled works (1) The nominated undertaker may construct and maintain the works speci®ed in Schedule 1 (ªthe scheduled worksº), being± (a) works for the construction of an underground railway between, in the west, a tunnel portal at Royal Oak in the City of Westminster and, in the east, tunnel portals at Custom House and Pudding Mill Lane in the London Borough of Newham, (b) works for the construction of other railways in the London Boroughs of Barking & Dagenham, Bexley, Ealing, Greenwich, Hammersmith and Fulham, Havering, Hillingdon, Newham, Redbridge and Tower Hamlets, the City of Westminster, the Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea, the District of Basildon and the Borough of Brentwood in the County of Essex, the Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead and the Borough of Slough in the County of Berkshire and the District of South Bucks in the County of Buckinghamshire, (c) works consequent on, or incidental to, the construction of the works mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b).
    [Show full text]
  • LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD
    LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD ACC/2423 Reference Description Dates LEE CONSERVANCY BOARD ENGINEER'S OFFICE Engineers' reports and letter books LEE CONSERVANCY BOARD: ENGINEER'S REPORTS ACC/2423/001 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1881 Jan-1883 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/002 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1884 Jan-1886 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/003 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1887 Jan-1889 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/004 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1890 Jan-1893 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/005 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1894 Jan-1896 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/006 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1897 Jan-1899 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/007 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1903 Jan-1903 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/008 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1904 Jan-1904 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/009 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1905 Jan-1905 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/010 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1906 Jan-1906 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 2 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD ACC/2423 Reference Description Dates ACC/2423/011 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1908 Jan-1908 Lea navigation/ stort navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/012 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1912 Jan-1912 Lea navigation/ stort navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/013 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1913 Jan-1913 Lea navigation/ stort navigation
    [Show full text]
  • Meridian Cuttings Meridian Cuttings
    MeridianMeridian CuttingsCuttings Issue No. 004 Spring 2013 The newsletter of the North & East and South London branches of The Inland Waterways Association Campaigning for the conservation, use, maintenance, restoration and development of the Inland Waterways - 1 - elcome to the Spring edition of Meridian Cuttings - although Spring seems as far away as when I was writing the last editorial in December. In preparation for our trip from Audlem, in Cheshire, to Canalway Cavalcade at WLittle Venice (see page 12) Alan and I had our boat, Tickety Boo, de winterised in mid March. Having spent two weekends attempting some paint patching in howling winds and blizzards we’re very much hoping the weather improves soon. We’re very excited about our trip and, at the last count, we’ll be amongst 148 other boats assembling for the 30th year of Cavalcade. Why not put in a couple of hours helping - there are lots of interesting things to do - give Libby a ring and she’ll give you some details. In preparation for the better weather waterside there are towpath walks you can join - take a look at the programme on page 8, and lots of opportunities to help smarten up a waterway near you - see Alison Smedley’s message on page 16, the C&RT Taskforce Diary on page 18, and the Wandle Community River Cleanups programme on page 22. There are lots of other snippets for you - some views of Deptford you may not have seen on page 15, Ian Shacklock’s concerns about the threat to Holborn Studios under the Eagle Wharf Regeneration scheme on page 9 and an update on the judgement against British Waterways (C&RT) also on page 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Examination in Public of Lldc Local Plan 2015 - 2031
    EXAMINATION IN PUBLIC OF LLDC LOCAL PLAN 2015 - 2031 PROPOSED ADDITIONS AND AMENDMENTS TO LOCAL PLAN Based on East End Waterway Group Representation made at the hearing session on 3 March 2015 MATTER 4: BUILT AND NATURAL ENVIRONMENT New para 2.4 (p. 8) HISTORY LOWER LEA VALLEY Pre-Roman Marshland, saltmarsh and tidal mud flats with timber trackways and ford across River Lea at Old Ford on prehistoric routeway across the flood plain. 43-410 AD Roman Britain Settlement at Stratford and along the Roman road to Colchester on higher ground in Bow: the road used the prehistoric ford at Old Ford 1100s-1500s Medieval Eight Mills in West Ham: probably in one or more tide mills on the tidal River Lea and Bow Back Rivers Marginal marshland used as meadow for hay, eg Old Ford Marsh Bow Bridge built over River Lea (first stone arch bridge in England) and causeway across wide flood plain to Stratford Langthorne (c.1110) Cicercian Abbey at Stratford Langthorne By the 13th century, the tide mills were grinding grain (brought by barge down the River Lea from Hertfordshire) into flour for the bakers of Bow to bake bread for sale in the City of London. Fulling mills on rivers for thickening newly-woven woollen cloth Dye works and woollen dyeing works 1600s and 1700s Industrial development World's first scarlet dye house at Bow (1607) First English calico printing works at West Ham (1676) Calico printing established at Old Ford Distilling alcohol in association with tide mills at Three Mills: for making gin West Ham Water Works opened c.1743 on Waterworks
    [Show full text]
  • British Waterways Board General Canal Bye-Laws
    BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD GENERAL CANAL BYE-LAWS 1965 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD BYE-LAWS ____________________ for regulation of the canals belonging to or under the control of the British Waterways Board (other than the canals specified in Bye-law 1) made pursuant to the powers of the British Transport Commission Act, 1954. (N.B. – The sub-headings and marginal notes do not form part of these Bye-laws). Application of Bye-laws Application of 1. These Bye-laws shall apply to every canal or inland navigation in Bye-Laws England and Wales belonging to or under the control of the British Waterways Board except the following canals: - (a) The Lee and Stort Navigation (b) the Gloucester and Sharpness Canal (c) the River Severn Navigation which are more particularly defined in the Schedule hereto. Provided that where the provisions of any of these Bye-laws are limited by such Bye-law to any particular canal or locality then such Bye-law shall apply only to such canal or locality to which it is so limited. These Bye-laws shall come into operation at the expiration of twenty-eight days after their confirmation by the Minister of Transport as from which date all existing Bye-laws applicable to the canals and inland navigations to which these Bye-laws apply (other than those made under the Explosives Act 1875, and the Petroleum (Consolidation) Act 1928) shall cease to have effect, without prejudice to the validity of anything done thereunder or to any liability incurred in respect of any act or omission before the date of coming into operation of these Bye-laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Discover Old Ford Lock & Bow Wharf
    Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Victoria River Lee Navigation Bonner Hall Well Street G Park Islington Hackney Bridge Common r Camden o v Green e Victoria Park R l o a a n Skew Deer Park Pavilion a d Café C Bridge n io n Re U ge n West Lake rd t’s o f C Chinese rt an He Discover al Pagoda d Se oa Grove Road Old Ford Lock w R e a c Bridge rd rd a st o l & Bow Wharf o F P ne d r R Ol to Old Ford Lock & oa ic d V Royal Bow Wharf recall Old Ford Lock Wennington London’s grimy Road industrial past. Now Bethnal Green being regenerated, Wennington it remains a great Green place to spot historic Little adventures Bow Mile End d canal features. o a Ecology on your doorstep Wharf R an Park o m STAY SAFE: R Stay Away From Mile End the Edge Mile End & Three Mills Map not to scale: covers approx 0.5 miles/0.8km Limehouse River Thames A little bit of history Old Ford Lock is where the Regent’s Canal meets the Hertford Union Canal. The lock and Bow Wharf are reminders of how these canals were once a link in the chain between the Port of London and the north. Today, regeneration means this area is a great place for family walks, bike rides and for spotting wildlife. Best of all it’s FREE!* ive things to d F o at O ld Fo rd Lo ck & Bow Wharf Information Spot old canal buildings converted to new uses and Bow Wharf canal boats moored along the canal.
    [Show full text]
  • CONFIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM to the BOARD [Redactions Below Relate to Commercially Confidential Information] REGENERATION REPORT – JANUARY 2010
    INFORMATION & DECISION REPORT BWB 3392 CONFIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM TO THE BOARD [Redactions below relate to commercially confidential information] REGENERATION REPORT – JANUARY 2010 Report by Director of Regeneration 1. PURPOSE: 1.1 To update the Board on key regeneration activities across England and Wales 1.2 To seek Board approval to increase expenditure on Three Mills Lock project to £ [ ] (£ [ ] previously noted), to cover risk of additional costs being awarded against BW following Adjudication process. 2.0 NEW REGENERATION DIRECTORATE: 2.1 The new Regeneration Directorate is now fully operational. The transition of regeneration/external funding functions from the former Business Units into the four geographical teams has been a smooth process with project continuity and the need to maintain key external relationships being uppermost in our minds. 3.0 REGENERATION SECTOR COMMENTARY: 3.1 Regional Development Agencies: The future of the RDA’s continues to be debated with the Conservative’s seemingly backtracking on previous pledges to scrap them, in favour of a more flexible approach dependent on whether respective local authorities valued them or not. It is suggested that where LA’s might opt to remove a RDA, the agency would be replaced by a partnership of Councils around real economic regions. These Local Enterprise Partnerships would closely resemble the ‘Leeds City Region’ model although with a smaller number of councils – maybe seven to eight. The Labour Party has however reiterated its support for RDA’s stating recently that they would remain central to Govt plans for economic recovery. 3.2 Conservative Party Policy on Regeneration: The Tory green paper, which was expected to be published in the New Year, has been deferred.
    [Show full text]