RDJR0658 Paddy Market

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

RDJR0658 Paddy Market Appendix Appendix 1: The selected 3 areas for feasibility study A-1 Mongkol Borei, Banteay Meanchey + Babel & Thma Koul, Battambang Koy Maeng Ruessei Kraok # N #Y# Feasibility Study Area Bat Trang Mongkol Borei Mongkol Borei, Bavel and Thma Koul Districts # # # Ta Lam # Rohat Tuek Srah Reang # Ou Prasat # # Chamnaom Kouk Ballangk # # Sambuor P# hnum Touch Soea # Boeng Pring # # Prey Khpo#s Lvea Chrouy Sdau # Thmar Koul Kouk Khmum Ta Meun Ampil Pram Daeum Khnach Romeas # # # # # # # Bansay TraenY#g# Bavel Y# Bavel Rung Chrey Ta Pung BANTEAY MEAN CHEY Kdol Ta Hae#n (/5 Ru ess ei K rao k #Ko y Ma en g # Bat Tr an g #Mong kol Borei Ta La m #Ban te ay #YNea ng # Anlong Run # Sra h Re a ng Roha t Tu e k # Ou Ta Ki # Kou k Ba l ang k #Ou Pras a t # Sa m bu o r Ch am n #aom # BANTEAY ME AN CHEY Phnu m To uc h # #So e a # Bo en g Pri ng Lve a Pre y Kh p#o s # # Chro u y Sd au BAT TAMB ANG # Kou k Kh mum Thma K ou l Kh nac h R om e as Ta Meu n Ampil Pra m Daeu m Bav e l Bans a y Tr aen g # Ru ng Ch#re y ## Ta Pu n g # Y#B#av el # Y# Chrey# # Kd ol T a Hae n BATTAMBANG An lon g Ru #n # Ou Ta K i # Chre y Provincial road 8 0 8 16 Kilometers National road Railway A-2 Moung Ruesssei, Battambang + Bakan, Pursat Feasibility Study Area N Moung Ruessei and Bakan Districts Prey Touch # Thipakdei # # Kakaoh 5 Ta Loas /( # Moung Ruessei # Chrey Moung Ruessei #Y# # Kear # Robas Mongkol Prey Svay # Ruessei Krang Me Tuek # # Svay Doun Kaev # # #Ou Ta Paong Preaek Chik Boeng Khnar # # Bakan Sampov Lun Boeng Bat Kandaol Trapeang Chong #Phnum Proek BATTAM BANG # # # Ba#vel Thma# Koul Prey Tralach # Y# Rumlech Khnar Totueng Aek P#hnum # Snam Preah Battambang #BATTAMBANG Kamri eng Y## # # Sangkae Ban#an Rotanak Mond#ol PURSAT Koas #Krala #Moung Ruessei Ta Lou Sam#l out # #Bakan # #Y Kandieng PURSATSampov Meas#Krakor # Phnum Kravanh Provincial road National road 9 0 9 18 Kilometers Railway A-3 Sithor Knadal, Khan Chhriech, Prey Veng, Pea Reaong, Kamchay Mear, Kampong Leav & Peam Ro, Prey Veng Feasibility Study Area Sithor Kandal, Kanh Chriech, Prey Veng, Kampong Leav and Peam Ro Districts # Pnov Ti Muoy Preaek Changkran # # Rumlech Lve # # Pnov Ti Pir Chrey Khmum # Sithor Kandal Y# #Prey Daeum Thnoeng Prey Tueng # # # Kouk Kong Lech Ruessei Sanh Tnaot # # Prey Sralet Ampil Krau Kouk Kong Kaeut Mesa Prachan # Kanhchriech # # # # # Kanhcham Pou Ti Kanhchriech #Kdoeang Reay Y# # Pea Reang Thma Pun Cheach Reab Roka # Kampong Popil # Y# # Chong Ampil # # # # Prey Pnov Seang Khveang Preal # Prey Sniet (11 # Krabau / Prey Khla # # Trabeaek # # Kranhung Kampong Prang Kampong Ruessei Chea Khlang # # Svay Antor # Kamchay Mear Popueus # Doun Koeng # # Y# # Y # # Smaong Cheung Prey Kanlaong Prey Veng # Pou Rieng # Me Bon Chrey Preaek Ta Sar # Angkor Tret # # # # Kampong Leav Ta Kao Smaong Tboung Preaek Anteah Cheung Tuek Damrei Puon # # Y# # # # Kampong Leav Pean Roung Preaek Chrey # # Baray # Samraong # Prey Kandieng Ba Baong Tuek Thla # # Peam Mean Chey # # Peam Ro Y# Peam Ro Preaek Khsay Ka # # Banlich Prasat Preaek Changkran # Pnov Ti Muo#y #Lve PREY VENG Preaek Khsay Kha R#umlech # Chre#y Khmum #Pnov Ti Pir # Sithor Kandal Neak Loeang ##Prey Daeum Thnoeng Prey Tuen#g R#uessei Sanh # Tnaot #Kouk Kong Le#chKouk Kong Kaeut Prey Sralet Pou Ti Ampil Krau Kanhchriech #Mesa Pra#chan # # # K#a nhcham Kdoeang Rea y Y#Thma Pun Pea Reang # # Cheach Reab # # Y##Roka Chong Ampil Kamp#ong Popil Prey Pnov # Seang# Khveang Prey Snie t # Preal Krabau # # Kranhung # #Prey Khla T#rabeaek # Kampong Prang Chea Khlang # Ka#mpong Ruessei Svay Anto#r Kamchay Mear Popueu#s Doun Koe ng Y# Po#u Rieng # YPrey VeaeC#hnrgey #Smaong Che ung Pr#ey KanlaMoneg Bon # Preaek Ta Sar # An#gkor Tret Smaong Tboung # Kampong Leav Ta# Kao # Preaek AnteahCh#eung Tuek Damre i Puon # Ka#mY#pong Leav # Pean R#oung Baray Pr#eaek Chre#y Sa#mraong # Prey Kandieng Tuek Thla # # Ba Baong Peam Mean Chey # #Peam Ro Y# Preaek Khsay Ka Peam Ro # #Banlich Prasat Preaek Khsay Kha# #Neak Loeang N (/11 8 0 8 16 Kilometers Provincial road National road Railway A-4 Appendix 2: Characteristic provincial rice balance A-5 01. Banteay Meanchey Cropping year 1995-1996 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 2005 2005-2006 Total of Planning area croppin Planted area 141,688 145,138 149,400 157,800 146,010 160,075 171,190 185,364 187,014 200,711 205,432 g year Damaged area 12,981 15,089 2,452 12,737 2,267 Harvested area 102,820 127,538 129,400 124,990 140,500 137,796 158,209 170,275 184,562 187,974 203,165 Yield 1.44 1.51 1.28 1.93 1.73 1.77 2.04 1.36 1.75 1.81 2.10 Production 148,557 192,770 165,890 240,770 243,446 244,391 323,240 232,062 323,163 340,803 420,843 Remaining paddy 123,302 159,999 137,689 199,839 202,060 202,845 281,219 201,894 281,152 296,499 366,133 Available for consumption (milled rice) 76,447 99,199 85,367 123,900 125,277 125,764 179,980 129,212 179,937 189,759 234,325 Requirement to eat (milled rice) 82,344 81,497 85,957 89,919 92,077 106,347 102,994 106,942 107,592 100,878 113,601 Surplus (milled rice) -4,055 17,131 -590 33,981 33,200 19,416 76,986 22,270 72,345 88,881 120,725 Surplus (paddy) -6,540 27,631 -952 54,808 53,548 31,316 120,291 34,797 113,039 138,877 188,633 Wet Planning area season Planted area 141,150 144,600 149,250 157,500 145,700 159,563 169,200 181,043 186,469 198,675 201,165 crops Damaged area 38,868 31,000 63,750 62,750 5,500 22,279 12,931 15,089 2,452 12,737 2,267 Harvested area 102,282 127,000 129,250 124,700 140,200 137,284 157,759 169,847 184,017 185,938 201,165 Yield 1.44 1.51 1.28 1.92 1.73 1.77 2.04 1.36 1.75 1.80 2.10 Production 147,287 191,500 165,440 239,900 242,546 242,855 321,912 230,992 321,293 334,695 414,396 Dry Planning area season Planted area 538 65 150 300 310 512 500 428 545 2,036 2,000 crops Damaged area 10 10 0 50 0 0 0 0 Harvested area 538 65 150 290 300 512 450 428 545 2,036 2,000 Yield 2.48 2.46 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.95 2.50 3.43 3.00 3.20 Production 1,270 160 450 870 900 1,536 1,328 1,070 1,870 6,108 6,447 Rivised coefficiency for balance Planted area calucuration (MAFF) 450,000 2.10 2.2 420,843 Damaged area 400,000 1.93 2.0 2.04 1.81 Harvested 1.77 340,803 1.73 1.75 area 350,000 323,240 323,163 1.8 Yield ) 300,000 1.6 n o 1.44 t ( 244,391 1.51 240,770 243,446 1.36 ) n 250,000 232,062 1.4 a o Production i 1.28 h t / c n u 192,770 188,633 o d 200,000 1.2 t o ( r 165,890 d P Remaining l 148,557 , e ) 138,877 i paddy a 150,000 1.0 Y h ( 113,039 a 120,291 5 6 e 4 2 Available for 1 r 7 6 5 , 9 9 5 100,000 7 3 0.8 , , A consumption 0 2 0 0 7 6 4 , 2 0 2 8 0 8 0 9 , 8 0 (milled rice) 0 3 5 1 9 7 8 1 54,808 7 53,548 , , 0 4 5 9 5 , 1 , 0 , 7 2 1 9 7 4 4 3 8 , 2 2 1 2 31,316 1 34,797 50,000 2 0.6 1 Requirement 27,631 1 1 0 1 to eat (milled -6,540 -952 rice) 0 0.4 Surplus 1995- 1996- 1997- 1998- 1999- 2000- 2001- 2002- 2003- 2004- 2005- (milled rice) -50,000 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 0.2 Surplus Year (paddy) A-6 02. Battambang Cropping year 1995-1996 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 Total of Planning area croppin Planted area 175,751 156,228 195,705 203,333 185,454 208,299 206,581 203,643 224,268 235,703 238,760 g year Damaged area 47,140 22,711 18,968 22,937 2,440 Harvested area 147,791 121,200 139,283 169,900 169,771 152,781 159,441 180,932 205,300 212,766 236,320 Yield 2.00 2.12 1.63 1.98 2.11 2.05 2.18 1.63 2.17 2.20 2.60 Production 295,120 256,944 226,721 336,980 357,860 313,850 347,405 295,511 446,359 467,635 603,221 Remaining paddy 244,950 213,264 188,178 279,693 297,024 260,496 302,242 257,095 388,332 406,842 524,802 Available for consumption (milled rice) 151,869 132,223 116,671 173,410 184,155 161,507 193,435 164,541 248,533 260,379 335,873 Requirement to eat (milled rice) 108,350 107,881 106,744 128,854 126,314 143,582 139,054 142,027 140,115 144,424 145,393 Surplus (milled rice) 47,178 23,357 9,926 44,556 57,841 17,926 54,381 22,513 108,418 115,956 190,480 Surplus (paddy) 76,094 37,673 16,010 71,865 93,292 28,913 84,970 35,177 169,403 181,181 297,625 Wet Planning area season Planted area 173,323 153,800 193,065 202,033 184,154 206,294 203,881 201,917 222,568 228,255 236,775 crops Damaged area 27,960 37,856 119,594 33,333 15,583 55,518 46,940 22,690 18,968 22,899 2,357 Harvested area 145,363 120,000 136,643 168,700 168,571 150,776 156,941 179,227 203,600 212,031 234,418 Yield 1.98 2.12 1.61 1.99 2.11 2.04 2.17 1.62 2.17 2.20 2.50 Production 287,820 254,000 219,995 335,000 355,700 308,035 339,905 290,348 440,997 465,376 596,254 Dry Planning area season Planted area 2,428 1,225 2,640 1,300 1,300 2,005 2,700 1,726 1,700 800 1,985 crops Damaged area 100 100 0 200 21 0 65 83 Harvested area 2,428 1,200 2,640 1,200 1,200 2,005 2,500 1,705 1,700 735 1,902 Yield 3.00 2.50 2.55 1.65 1.8 2.90 3.00 3.03 3.15 3.07 3.70 Production 7,300 3,000 6,726 1,980 2,160 5,815 7,500 5,163 5,362 2,259 6,967 Rivised coefficiency for balance Planted area calucuration (MAFF) 650,000 2.8 603,221 Damaged area 2.60 600,000 2.6 550,000 Harvested 2.4 area 500,000 467,635 2.20 ) 4426.1,3759 n 2.11 2.2 o 450,000 t 2.05 Yield ( 2.00 1.98 2.18 2.12 ) n 400,000 a o 357,860 2.0 i 347,405 h t 336,980 / c 350,000 n u 313,850 Production o d 295,120 295,511 297,625 1.8 t o ( r 300,000 1.63 1.63 P 256,944 d l , e ) 226,721 1.6 i a 250,000 Y Remaining h ( paddy a 181,181 e 200,000 169,403 1.4 r A Available for 150,000 0 2 6 0 3 1.2 consumption 6 , 93,292 0 2 7 0 1 6 3 , 3 1 , 1 76,094 0 7 1 (milled rice) 3 2 71,865 9 3 4 100,000 5 8 , 9 7 9 2 1 0 , , 8 4 0 7 0 , 7 84,970 , 2 0 9 9 , 2 2 8 , 9 2 2 6 6 7 37,673 , 1 9 5 1.0 5 1 1 4 28,913 35,177 Requirement 1 3 1 1 50,000 1 2 16,010 1 1 to eat (milled 0 0.8 rice) 1995- 1996- 1997- 1998- 1999- 2000- 2001- 2002- 2003- 2004- 2005- Surplus (milled rice) 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Year Surplus (paddy) A-7 03.
Recommended publications
  • Download the Full Report
    H U M A N “They Treat Us Like Animals” R I G H T S Mistreatment of Drug Users and “Undesirables” in Cambodia’s WATCH Drug Detention Centers “They Treat Us Like Animals” Mistreatment of Drug Users and “Undesirables” in Cambodia’s Drug Detention Centers Copyright © 2013 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-62313-0817 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch is dedicated to protecting the human rights of people around the world. We stand with victims and activists to prevent discrimination, to uphold political freedom, to protect people from inhumane conduct in wartime, and to bring offenders to justice. We investigate and expose human rights violations and hold abusers accountable. We challenge governments and those who hold power to end abusive practices and respect international human rights law. We enlist the public and the international community to support the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org DECEMBER 2013 978-1-62313-0817 “They Treat Us Like Animals” Mistreatment of Drug Users and “Undesirables” in Cambodia’s Drug Detention Centers Map 1: Closed Drug Detention Centers and the Planned National Center .............................. i Map 2: Current Drug Detention Centers in Cambodia .......................................................... ii Summary ........................................................................................................................... 1 Recommendations .............................................................................................................. 7 To the Government of Cambodia ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix J.2.3)
    Supplementary Appendix H.1 NORTHWEST IRRIGATION SECTOR PROJECT LINK CANAL SUBPROJECT RESETTLEMENT PLAN List of Contents Page 1. The Project 3 2. Impact on Structures and Land Acquisition 4 3. Mitigating Project Impact 5 4. Socio-Economic Situation in the Project Area. 6 4.1 Project Socioeconomic Surveys 6 4.2 Socio-Economic Characteristics Of The Wider Project Area 6 5. Objectives, Policy Framework and Entitlements 16 6. Mitigating Impact and Ensuring the Restoration of Livelihoods of APs 18 7. Participation, Information and Consultation and Grievance Redress 21 7.1 AP Participation 21 7.2 Disclosure of Information to APs 21 7.3 The Grievance Process 22 8. Management and Organisation 24 9. Resettlement Budget 26 10.Implementation Schedule 28 11.Monitoring and Evaluation 28 List of Tables: Number Title Page No. 3.1 Development Agents Working in Area 7 4.1 Demographics of Subproject Area 8 4.2 Village Demographics 8 4.3 Age-Sex distribution of APs 9 4.4 Size of AP households 9 4.5 Incidence of Overall Poverty in Subproject Area 9 4.6 APs Deficit in rice production for household 9 4.7 APs Duration of Rice Deficit last year (months) 9 4.8 Literacy of household head and spouse 10 i Supplementary Appendix H.1 4.9 School attendance of children of primary school age 10 4.10 Reason for non-attendance school 10 4.11 Attendance of school age children: Lower secondary 10 4.12 Reason for non-attendance at secondary school 10 4.13 Village Land, Farming System, Non-Farming Occupations and Mines or UXO Pesence 12 4.14 Bavel District, Kdol Commune, Villages
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation Report on ECHO Funded Humanitarian Mine Action Pilot Projects in North-West of Cambodia
    James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Center for International Stabilization and Global CWD Repository Recovery Fall 10-2003 Evaluation Report on ECHO Funded Humanitarian Mine Action Pilot Projects in North-West of Cambodia Marcel Durocher Agim Hoti Mok Tonh Keo Vut Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/cisr-globalcwd Part of the Defense and Security Studies Commons, Peace and Conflict Studies Commons, Public Policy Commons, and the Social Policy Commons Recommended Citation Durocher, Marcel; Hoti, Agim; Tonh, Mok; and Vut, Keo, "Evaluation Report on ECHO Funded Humanitarian Mine Action Pilot Projects in North-West of Cambodia" (2003). Global CWD Repository. 1132. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/cisr-globalcwd/1132 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for International Stabilization and Recovery at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Global CWD Repository by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EVALUATION REPORT ON ECHO FUNDED HUMANITARIAN MINE ACTION PILOT PROJECTS IN NORTH-WEST OF CAMBODIA th October 6 2003 Marcel Durocher Agim Hoti Mok Tonh Keo Vuthy TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS.......................................................................................................... 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................................................. 6 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cambodia PRASAC Microfinance Institution
    Maybank Money Express (MME) Agent - Cambodia PRASAC Microfinance Institution Branch Location Last Update: 02/02/2015 NO NAME OF AGENT REGION / PROVINCE ADDRESS CONTACT NUMBER OPERATING HOUR 1 PSC Head Office PHNOM PENH #25, Str 294&57, Boeung Kengkang1,Chamkarmon, Phnom Penh, Cambodia 023 220 102/213 642 7.30am-4pm National Road No.5, Group No.5, Phum Ou Ambel, Krong Serey Sophorn, Banteay 2 PSC BANTEAY MEANCHEY BANTEAY MEANCHEY Meanchey Province 054 6966 668 7.30am-4pm 3 PSC POAY PET BANTEAY MEANCHEY Phum Kilometre lek 4, Sangkat Poipet, Krong Poipet, Banteay Meanchey 054 63 00 089 7.30am-4pm Chop, Chop Vari, Preah Net 4 PSC PREAH NETR PREAH BANTEAY MEANCHEY Preah, Banteay Meanchey 054 65 35 168 7.30am-4pm Kumru, Kumru, Thmor Puok, 5 PSC THMAR POURK BANTEAY MEANCHEY Banteay Meanchey 054 63 00 090 7.30am-4pm No.155, National Road No.5, Phum Ou Khcheay, Sangkat Praek Preah Sdach, Krong 6 PSC BATTAMBANG BATTAMBANG Battambang, Battambang Province 053 6985 985 7.30am-4pm Kansai Banteay village, Maung commune, Moung Russei district, Battambang 7 PSC MOUNG RUESSEI BATTAMBANG province 053 6669 669 7.30am-4pm 8 PSC BAVEL BATTAMBANG Spean Kandoal, Bavel, Bavel, BB 053 6364 087 7.30am-4pm Phnom Touch, Pech Chenda, 9 PSC PHNOM PROEK BATTAMBANG Phnum Proek, BB 053 666 88 44 7.30am-4pm Boeng Chaeng, Snoeng, Banan, 10 PSC BANANN BATTAMBANG Battambang 053 666 88 33 7.30am-4pm No.167, National Road No.7 Chas, Group No.10 , Phum Prampi, Sangkat Kampong 11 PSC KAMPONG CHAM KAMPONG CHAM Cham, Krong Kampong Cham, Kampong Cham Province 042 6333 000 7.30am-4pm
    [Show full text]
  • Cambodia: Human Rights Before and After the Elections
    May 1993 Vol.5 No.10 CAMBODIA: HUMAN RIGHTS BEFORE AND AFTER THE ELECTIONS I. INTRODUCTION Cambodians will go to the polls on May 23 in an atmosphere of political and ethnic violence and renewed civil war. The elections are the culmination of a 17-month United Nations presence, the largest, most ambitious and most expensive peace-keeping effort ever, which was supposed to bring about an end to the conflict. Instead, Cambodia is faced with as much fighting as when the United Nations Transitional Authority in Cambodia (UNTAC) entered the country in March 1992, and a spiralling level of serious human rights abuses. The "neutral political environment" that was supposed to be the precondition for elections is entirely absent. The five permanent members of the Security Council and other drafters of the 1991 Paris peace accords, formally known as the Agreements on a Comprehensive Political Settlement of the Cambodia Conflict, are determined to go ahead with the elections regardless. But what happens on May 23 is almost less important than what happens in the days after the results are announced. Asia Watch believes that an analysis of the missteps that led to the current human rights situation is critically important to determining how, or perhaps whether, human rights of Cambodians can be protected under whatever government comes to power then. The reasons for the deterioration in the human rights situation in late 1992 and early 1993 are complex. None of the parties to the conflict has a history of respect for human rights and one, Democratic Kampuchea, better known as the Khmer Rouge, has one of the worst human rights records in modern history.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Price Monitoring in Kandal, Prey Veng and Takeo Provinces of Cambodia
    Fish Price Monitoring in Kandal, Prey Veng and Takeo Provinces of Cambodia by 1 1 2 Ker Naret , Sem Viryak and Don Griffiths 1. Fishery Officer, Department of Fisheries, and Counterpart of the MRC/DoF/Danida Fisheries Project in Cambodia 2. Chief Technical Advisor, MRC - Rural Extension for Aquaculture Development Project ABSTRACT Fish marketing data are vital for any aquaculture development project because it influences potential supply, demand and distribution channels of fish. The Rural Extension for Aquaculture Development (READ) Cambodian Sub-Component monitored fish prices eight times per month throughout 1999, in representative markets in Kandal, Prey Veng and Takeo provinces in Cambodia. A total of 90 fish dealers (30 per province) were also interviewed. Results showed that River Catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus), Snakeheads (Channa spp.) and Walking Catfish (Clarias spp.) were the major cultured fish by weight in all markets on sampling days. The quantities of cultured fish traded in Prey Veng markets was less than for Kandal and Takeo markets. In Kandal 38% of fish traded was cultured. Snakeheads (Channa spp.), Goonch (Bagarius bagarius), Climbing Perch (Anabas testudineus), Catfish (Mystus spp. and Clarias spp.), Silver Barb (Barbodes gonionotus) and Riel (Henicorhynchus spp.) were the major wild fish species found in each province. Wild fish prices were generally highest from June to August and lowest from December to February. Mackerel (Scomber spp.) was the only marine fish species in the markets of each province. There were greater quantities of Mackerel in Kandal and Takeo than in Prey Veng province, and Mackerel was available year round in Kandal market. The main fish supply channels were through Saang district in Kandal province; Angkor Borei, Bourei Cholsar and Kaoh Andaet districts in Takeo province, and Kampong Leav district in Prey Veng province.
    [Show full text]
  • Correspondence with the Cambodian Government
    H U M A N “They Treat Us Like Animals” R I G H T S Mistreatment of Drug Users and “Undesirables” in Cambodia’s WATCH Drug Detention Centers “They Treat Us Like Animals” Mistreatment of Drug Users and “Undesirables” in Cambodia’s Drug Detention Centers Copyright © 2013 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-62313-0817 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch is dedicated to protecting the human rights of people around the world. We stand with victims and activists to prevent discrimination, to uphold political freedom, to protect people from inhumane conduct in wartime, and to bring offenders to justice. We investigate and expose human rights violations and hold abusers accountable. We challenge governments and those who hold power to end abusive practices and respect international human rights law. We enlist the public and the international community to support the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org DECEMBER 2013 978-1-62313-0817 “They Treat Us Like Animals” Mistreatment of Drug Users and “Undesirables” in Cambodia’s Drug Detention Centers Map 1: Closed Drug Detention Centers and the Planned National Center .............................. i Map 2: Current Drug Detention Centers in Cambodia .......................................................... ii Summary ........................................................................................................................... 1 Recommendations .............................................................................................................. 7 To the Government of Cambodia ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • C.M.A.A Request for Proposal
    C.M.A.A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL RFP No: 001/CMAA/BTB/CFR/2015 For Battambang Land Release Project Annex I Instructions to Offerors A. Introduction 1. General The CMAA is seeking suitably qualified CMAA‐accredited operators to conduct Battambang Land Release Project as per Statement of Work (SOW) attached in Annex‐III. 2. Cost of proposal The Offeror shall bear all costs associated with the preparation and submission of the Proposal, the CMAA will in no case be responsible or liable for those costs, regardless of the conduct or outcome of the solicitation. B. Solicitation Documents 3. Contents of solicitation documents Proposals must offer services for the total requirement. Proposals offering only part of the requirement will be rejected. The Offeror is expected to examine all corresponding instructions, forms, terms and specifications contained in the Solicitation Documents. Failure to comply with these documents will be at the Offeror’s risk and may affect the evaluation of the Proposal. 4. Clarification of solicitation documents A prospective Offeror requiring any clarification of the Solicitation Documents may notify the CMAA in writing to [email protected]. The CMAA will respond in writing to any request for clarification of the Solicitation Documents that it receives earlier than 20 November 2014. Written copies of the CMAA’s response (including an explanation of the query but without identifying the source of inquiry) will be sent by email to all prospective Offerors that has received the Solicitation Documents. 5. Amendments of solicitation documents At any time prior to the deadline for submission of Proposals, the CMAA may, for any reason, whether at its own initiative or in response to a clarification requested by a prospective Offeror, modify the Solicitation Documents by amendment.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambodia: Comfrel's Report on Irregularities in Voter List Revision
    Cambodia: Comfrel’s Report on Irregularities in Voter List Revision and Voter Registration During the process of voter list revision and voter registration for 2007, lasting from September 15 to October 20, 2007, COMFREL has deployed around 200 observers to observe in 400 communes/sangkats across 24 provinces/cities.1 In general, COMFREL observes that both the political and security environment have been improved, although some voters used to or have felt concerns about insecurity, as in previous pre-national election periods. COMFREL highly appreciates the efforts of the National Election Committee (NEC) and officials at all levels, especially village and commune authorities, who have been carrying out voter list revision and voter registration. In some communes, clerks and councils have worked together to create mobile registration working groups to register voters in villages. However, COMFREL observes that the speed of voter registration this year is slower than that of last year. According to NEC temporary results, dated September 28, 2007, by September 26, 2007, in 1,608 communes/sangkats across 24 provinces/cities, the number of newly registered voters was 233,776, which represents 34% of the NEC estimate of 682,459. For the same period in 2006, the rate of voter registration was 47% (273,477 of an estimated 577,205 new voters to be registered). Meanwhile, COMFREL has doubts about the NEC’s unclear estimation on the number of voters to be registered, as the NEC made a wrong estimation number of new voters to be registered in 2006 (estimating around 570,000 new voters while in reality the number had increased to 1.2 million).
    [Show full text]
  • Download Document
    GS VERIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION REPORT - 5TH PERIODIC – NATIONAL BIODIGESTER PROGRAMME NATIONAL BIODIGESTER PROGRAMME, CAMBODIA GS REF. NO. : GS 751 Monitoring Period: 2016-01-01 to 2016-12-31 (incl. both days) Report No: MY-PVerGS 17/08 <17/006> GS751 Date: 2017-07-02 TÜV NORD CERT GmbH JI/CDM Certification Program Langemarckstraße, 20 45141 Essen, Germany Phone: +49-201-825-3329 Fax: +49-201-825-2139 www.tuev-nord.de www.global-warming.de S01-VA050-F01 Rev.02 / 2014-07-08 5th Periodic Verification and Certification Report: National Biodigester Programme, Cambodia TÜV NORD JI/CDM Certification Program R-No: MY-PVerGS 17/08 <17/006> Verification Report: Report No. Rev. No. Date of 1st issue: Date of this rev. MY-PVerGS 17/08 <17/006> 1.0 2017-07-02 2017-07-02 Project: Title: Registration date: UNFCCC-No.: National Biodigester Programme, Cambodia N/A N/A Registration date: GS-ID.: 2011-05-24 GS751 Verification No.: 5th periodic verification Crediting period: From: To: Renewable (7y) Fixed (10y) 2012-01-01 2018-12-31 Project Scale: Large Scale Small Scale Project Participant(s): Client: National Biodigester Programme Non Annex 1 country: Annex 1 country: Cambodia N/A PP from non-Annex 1 country: PP from Annex 1 country: National Biodigester Programme N/A Applied Title: No.: Scope(s) / TA(s) methodology/ies: Technologies and practices to displace decentralized 1, 3, 13 / 1.2, Ver. 2.0 thermal energy consumption 3.1, 13.2 Monitoring period and Monitoring period (MP): Monitoring Report: monitoring report From: To: No. of days: Draft version:
    [Show full text]
  • LEAP) (P153591) Public Disclosure Authorized
    SFG2503 REV KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA Livelihood Enhancement and Association of the Poor Public Disclosure Authorized (LEAP) (P153591) Public Disclosure Authorized Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) November 14, 2016 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized LEAP P153591 – Resettlement Policy Framework, November 14, 2016 Livelihood Enhancement and Association of the Poor (LEAP) (P153591) TABLE OF CONTENT TABLE OF CONTENT ............................................................................................................................... i LIST OF ACRONYMS .............................................................................................................................. iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... v 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.1. Background .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2. Social Analysis ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.3. Requirements for RPF and Purpose ......................................................................................... 2 2. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION........................ 3 2.1. Project Development Objective ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • General Population Census of Cambodia 1998 Final Census Results
    KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA Nation - Religion - King General Population Census of Cambodia 1998 Final Census Results (2nd Edition) National Institute of Statistics, Ministry of Planning Phnom Penh, Cambodia Funded by: United Nations Population Fund August, 2002 CONTENTS Page Foreword by HE Minister of Planning 3 Foreword by UNFPA Representative, Cambodia 5 Cambodia-Province Map 6 Figures at a Glance 7 SECTION 1- Introduction 10 SECTION 2- Brief Analysis of Final Census Results of Cambodia 17 GLOSSARY 37 SECTION 3- Census Tables 41 Cambodia 42 Provinces / Municipalities (with Analytical Notes) 45 01. Banteay Mean Chey 46 02. Bat Dambang 56 03. Kampong Cham 67 04. Kampong Chhnang 80 05. Kampong Spueu 91 06. Kampong Thum 102 07. Kampot 113 08. Kandal 124 09. Kaoh Kong 136 10. Kracheh 146 11. Mondol Kiri 156 12. Phnom Penh Municipality 165 13. Preah Vihear 176 14. Prey Veaeng 186 15. Pousat 198 16. Rotanak Kiri 208 17. Siem Reab 218 1 18. Krong Preah Sihanouk 229 19. Stueng Traeng 238 20. Svay Rieng 248 21. Takaev 259 22. Otdar Mean Chey 270 23. Krong Kaeb 279 24. Krong Pailin 288 Annexes Annex 1- Form A - Houselisting and 297 Form B - Households Questionnaires 298 Annex 2- List of Priority Tables 302 Annex 3- Publication Programme 304 2 TOC FOREWORD By HE Minister of Planning, Cambodia It is with great pleasure that I present this report containing the final population figures and some important results of the 1998 Census of Cambodia. Earlier, in August 1998, the provisional population figures were released based on a quick tabulation of summary figures provided by the enumerators.
    [Show full text]