77 (1): 87 –124 2019 © Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, 2019. Revision of Agraptocoris Reuter (Heteroptera: Miridae: Phylinae), with description of five new species and a review of aedeagal terminology Fedor V. Konstantinov Department of Entomology, Faculty of Biology, St. Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya nab 7/9, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia [
[email protected]] — Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia Accepted on February 21, 2019. Published online at www.senckenberg.de/arthropod-systematics on May 17, 2019. Published in print on June 03, 2019. Editors in charge: Christian Schmidt & Klaus-Dieter Klass. Abstract. The predominantly Central Asian genus Agraptocoris Reuter is revised. Eight valid species are recognized, fve of those being described as new to science, namely A. eugeniae, A. nigrisetosus, A. pallescens, A. subconcolor (all Mongolia), and A. pamiricus (Tajik- istan and Kyrgyzstan). A phylogenetic analysis based on 37 morphological characters is presented for all Agraptocoris species and 13 outgroup taxa. This analysis establishes Agraptocoris as monophyletic and rendered the subtribes Phylina and Oncotylina as non-mono- phyletic. The differential diagnosis for the genus and a key to all species are given. Habitus photographs, illustrations of male genitalic structures, scanning micrographs of morphological structures, host and distributional information are provided for all species. Homologies and terminology of the aedeagal structures in the subfamily Phylinae are discussed. Key words. Taxonomy, phylogeny, hosts, male genitalia, distribution, key. 1. Introduction The genus Agraptocoris Reuter, 1903 belongs to the sub- (SCHUH & MENARD 2013). Although the novel classifca- family Phylinae of the family Miridae. With more than tion has signifcantly expanded our understanding of phy- 11000 described species, this family belongs to the top 20 lines and undoubtedly will have a huge impact on future most diverse families of insects (CASSIS & SCHUH 2012).