Genetics: Early Online, published on June 25, 2018 as 10.1534/genetics.118.301038

1

1 A crucial caste regulation gene detected by comparing and sister group

2

3

4 Yudai Masuoka1, 2, Kouhei Toga3, Christine A. Nalepa4, Kiyoto Maekawa2*

5 1. Graduate School of Science and Engineering, University of Toyama, Toyama 930-8555,

6 Japan

7 2. Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research

8 Organization, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8634, Japan

9 3. Department of Integrated Science in Physics and Biology, Nihon University, Tokyo

10 156-8550, Japan

11 4. Department of Entomology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7613,

12 USA

13

14 *Corresponding author (email address: [email protected])

15

16 Running head (about 35 characters inc. spaces): Caste regulation gene in termites

17

18 Keywords: termites, , soldier differentiation, juvenile hormone,

19 20-hydroxyecdysone

20

21 Author contributions

22 YM and KM designed experiments; YM, KT and CN collected samples and performed

23 application analysis with JHA; YM performed molecular experiments and analyzed data; YM,

Copyright 2018.

2

24 CN and KM wrote the manuscript; KM conceived of the study, designed the study,

25 coordinated the study; All authors read and gave final approval for publication.

26

27 Abstract

28 Sterile castes are a defining criterion of ; investigating their evolutionary origins

29 can critically advance theory. In termites, the soldier caste is regarded as the first acquired

30 permanently sterile caste. Previous studies showed that juvenile hormone (JH) is the primary

31 factor inducing soldier differentiation, and treatment of workers with artificial JH can

32 generate presoldier differentiation. It follows that a shift from a typical hemimetabolous JH

33 response might be required for soldier formation during the course of

34 within the clade. To address this possibility, analysis of the role of JH and its

35 signaling pathway was performed in the termite nevadensis and compared with

36 the woodroach Cryptocercus punctulatus, a member of the sister group of termites. Treatment

37 with a JH analog (JHA) induced a nymphal molt in C. punctulatus. RNA interference (RNAi)

38 of JH receptor Methoprene tolerant (Met) was then performed, and it inhibited the presoldier

39 molt in Z. nevadensis and the nymphal molt in C. punctulatus. Knockdown of Met in both

40 inhibited expression of 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E; the active form of ecdysone)

41 synthesis genes. However, in Z. nevadensis, several 20E signaling genes were specifically

42 inhibited by Met RNAi. Consequently, RNAi of these genes were performed in JHA-treated

43 termite individuals. Knockdown of 20E signaling and nuclear receptor gene, Hormone

44 receptor 39 (HR39/FTZ-F1β) resulted in newly-molted individuals with normal worker

45 phenotypes. This is the first report of the JH-Met signaling feature in termites and

46 Cryptocercus. JH-dependent molting activation is shared by both taxa, and mediation

3

47 between JH receptor and 20E signalings for soldier morphogenesis is specific to termites.

48

49 Introduction

50 The complex eusocial society of one-piece termites (those utilizing a single log as food and

51 nest) consists of a reproductive caste (queen and king) and temporarily or permanently sterile

52 castes (workers, also known as helpers, pseudergates or alloparents, and soldiers,

53 respectively). Termites are a monophyletic group within cockroaches (Lo et al. 2000; Inward

54 et al. 2007; Bourguignon et al. 2017), and the soldier caste is regarded as the first acquired

55 permanently sterile caste (Nalepa 2011). The molecular basis of termite soldier evolution,

56 however, is still far from fully understood. Increasing juvenile hormone (JH) titers triggers

57 soldier differentiation in workers via an intermediate presoldier stage (Noirot 1985; Roisin

58 1996), and can be induced in many termite species by treating workers with JH or JH analogs

59 (JHA) (Watanabe et al. 2014; Scharf 2015). This is in contrast to other , in which JH

60 maintains larval traits and has an inhibitory function on molting via suppression of PTTH

61 (prothoracicotropic hormone) release (Gilbert 2012). It is also known that treatment with

62 JHA can inhibit or delay 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E; the active form of ecdysone) synthesis

63 and suppress expression of the 20E signaling genes (Berger et al. 1992; Zufelato et al. 2000;

64 Aribi et al. 2006). In the German cockroach, Blattella germanica, JHA treatment of young

65 instars inhibited 20E synthesis and resulted in developmental arrest in the nymphal stage

66 (Hangartner and Masner 1973; Masner et al. 1975). Furthermore, JH inhibits expression

67 levels of the 20E induced heat shock protein gene in Drosophila melanogaster (Berger et al.

68 1992), but in D. melanogaster and Manduca sexta, JH activates expression level of the

69 20E-inducible nuclear receptor gene, E75 (Dubrovskaya et al. 2004). There is therefore a

4

70 possibility that one or more unidentified JH signaling pathways related to the involvement of

71 20E in both molting (from worker to presoldier) and morphological modification (formation

72 of weapons such as enlarged mandibles) were acquired during the course of termite evolution.

73 To clarify this hypothesis, it is necessary to analyze the role of JH in nymphal development in

74 additional cockroaches, particularly those of the sister group of termites, cockroaches in the

75 Cryptocercidae (woodroaches; Cryptocercus spp.).

76

77 Recently, the presence of JH signaling genes has been established in some model

78 species (Jindra et al. 2015). In both hemimetabolous (without pupal stage, including termites

79 and cockroaches) and holometabolous (with pupal stage) insects, a JH receptor, methoprene

80 tolerant (Met) and a steroid receptor coactivator (SRC; taiman; FISC) induce the expression

81 of Krüppel homolog 1 (Kr-h1), which is necessary for JH to function in maintaining

82 developmental status quo (Jindra et al. 2015; Riddiford 2013). Met and Kr-h1 knockdown

83 inhibited molts in the penultimate instar and induced precocious metamorphosis in Tribolium

84 castaneum (Konopova and Jindra 2007; Minakuchi et al. 2009) and B. germanica (Lozano

85 and Belles 2011, 2014). On the other hand, although Met is generally involved in insect

86 ovarian development, Kr-h1 function differed somewhat among species (Konopova et al.

87 2011; Song et al. 2014). Specifically, Kr-h1 was not required for ovarian development in the

88 linden bug, Pyrrhocoris apterus (Smykal et al. 2014). In termites, a previous study

89 demonstrated that RNA interference (RNAi) of Met suppressed soldier-specific

90 morphogenesis in (Masuoka et al. 2015). Roles of other JH

91 signaling genes, including Kr-h1, for termite soldier differentiation, however, have not been

92 clarified. Moreover, in Cryptocercus cockroaches no studies have focused on the function of

5

93 JH signaling genes during molting.

94

95 To determine potential differences in the role of JH during molting in C. punctulatus and

96 termites, JHA treatment of young nymphs was performed in C. punctulatus. To further

97 clarify the function of JH signaling genes in these taxa, RNAi knockdown of Met and Kr-h1

98 was conducted in both Z. nevadensis and C. punctulatus. Furthermore, expression and

99 functional analysis of 20E signaling genes was performed during JHA-induced soldier

100 differentiation. Based on the results, we discuss how the termite specific JH pathway is

101 related to soldier development, which involves notable morphological changes during the

102 molting processes.

103

104 Materials & Methods

105 Insects

106 Seventh instars of Z. nevadensis were sampled from three mature colonies, which were

107 collected at Hyogo Prefecture, Japan, in May 2015 and 2016 and kept at approximately 25 °C

108 in constant darkness until the following experiments were performed. Young instar nymphs

109 (head width = 1.31-1.57 mm, Class 1 (3rd or 4th instars); and head width = 1.91-2.12 mm,

110 Class 2 (probably 5th instars); Nalepa 1984, 1990) of C. punctulatus were collected at

111 Mountain Lake Biological Station, Giles County, Virginia, USA, in April 2015-2017. These

112 individuals were kept at 15 °C in constant darkness until use.

113

114 JHA treatment

115 In Z. nevadensis, according to the methods of Saiki et al. 2014, filter paper was treated with 0

6

116 (for control) or 10 μg JHA (pyriproxyfen; Wako, Osaka, Japan) dissolved in 400 μL acetone

117 and placed in a 90 mm petri dish with 10 individual 7th instars. In C. punctulatus, filter paper

118 and 200 mg cellulose powder (Wako) was treated with 0 (for control) or 100 μg pyriproxyfen

119 dissolved in 200 μL acetone and placed in a 60 mm petri dish with 10 Class 1 or 2 nymphs.

120 All petri dishes were kept in an incubator at 25 °C (Z. nevadensis) or 15 °C (C. punctulatus)

121 in constant darkness for 30 days. Dishes were checked for dead and newly molted individuals

122 every 24 hours. Molting rates in each species were compared between JHA and acetone

123 control treatments. Fisher's exact test was performed using Mac Statistical Analysis ver. 2.0

124 (Esumi, Tokyo, Japan).

125

126 RNA interference (RNAi) experiment

127 Each double-strand RNA (dsRNA) was generated by the partial cDNA sequences amplified

128 by the gene-specific primers (Table S1) using T7 RNA polymerase with a MEGA script T7

129 transcription kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA). As in previous studies (Masuoka et al. 2015,

130 2018; Masuoka and Maekawa 2016a, b), GFP was selected as a control gene, and dsRNA

131 was generated using GFP vector pQBI-polII (Wako, Osaka, Japan). Specific primers of the

132 following genes of Z. nevadensis, ZnMet (Gene ID: Znev_09571; Terrapon et al. 2014),

133 ZnSRC (Znev_05083), ZnKr-h1 (Znev_04171), ZnShr (Znev_16529), ZnSpo (Znev_04417),

134 ZnEcR (Znev_13925), ZnE74 (Znev_00833), ZnE75 (Znev_11406), ZnHR3 (Znev_14707),

135 and ZnHR39 (Znev_00332) were designed from genome sequence data using Primer3 plus

136 software (Untergasser et al. 2007). Specific primers of the following genes of C. punctulatus,

137 CpMet (EST ID: Cp_TR6397) and CpKr-h1 (Cp_TR7552), were designed from

138 transcriptome sequence data (Hayashi et al. 2017; DDBJ Sequence Read Archive database

7

139 accession number: DRA004598) using Primer3 plus. Each dsRNA (500 ng in 136 nL (Z.

140 nevadensis), 4 μg in 272 nL (C. punctulatus)) was injected into the side of the thorax of

141 individuals using a Nanoliter 2000 microinjector (World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL,

142 USA). Within 24 hours of the injection, all individuals were placed in a petri dish with a filter

143 paper (and also cellulose powder for C. punctulatus) treated with pyriproxyfen or acetone,

144 and the dish was kept in an incubator as in the previous section. Molting rate was compared

145 between treatments, and Fisher's exact test was performed for the statistical analysis using

146 statistical software R v. 3.1.2 (Ihaka and Gentleman 1996). To evaluate the effects of ZnMet

147 dsRNA injection timing, dsRNA was injected every 24 hours after JHA treatment (until 120

148 hours, day 0-5).

149

150 Gene expression analysis

151 Three individuals were collected three days after the dsRNA injection. Total RNA was

152 extracted from the whole body of each individual using ISOGEN (NipponGene, Tokyo,

153 Japan). The extracted RNA was purified with DNase treatment and used for cDNA synthesis

154 using High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems). Specific

155 primers of 20E related genes of Z. nevadensis and C. punctulatus (Nvd: Znev_04416 and

156 Cp_TR25860; Shr: Znev_16529 and Cp_TR25505; Spo: Znev_04417 and Cp_TR54771;

157 Phm: Znev_00957; Dib: Znev_08701 and Cp_TR16740; Sad: Znev_14659; Shd:

158 Znev_02808; EcR: Cp_TR4152; USP: Znev_11534; Br-C: Znev_09723; E63: Znev_06687

159 and Cp_TR16589; E74: Znev_00833 and Cp_TR3685; E75: Cp_TR8108; E93: Znev_02008;

160 HR3: Znev_14707 and Cp_TR38613; HR4: Znev_17691; HR38: Znev_16131; HR39:

161 Znev_00332 and Cp_TR1259; HR78: Znev_03071; HR96: Znev_06284 and Cp_TR49824;

8

162 FTZ-F1: Znev_18259) were newly designed as shown in the previous section (Table S1). JH

163 signaling genes of C. punctulatus (CpMet: Cp_TR6397 and CpKr-h1: Cp_TR7552) were also

164 newly designed as shown in the previous section. Primers of JH signaling genes (ZnMet,

165 ZnSRC and ZnKr-h1) and 20E signaling genes of Z. nevadensis (ZnEcR, ZnBr-C, ZnHR4 and

166 ZnE75) were previously described (Masuoka et al. 2015, Masuoka and Maekawa 2016a). The

167 expression level of each gene was quantified using a THUNDERBIRD SYBR qPCR Mix

168 (TOYOBO, Osaka, Japan) and MiniOpticon Real-Time System detection system (Bio-Rad,

169 Hercules, CA, USA). An endogenous control gene was selected from the following three

170 genes, EF1-alpha (Zn: Accession No. AB915828, Cp: Accession No. AFK49795), beta-actin

171 (Zn: No. AB915826, Cp: Cp_TR19468) and NADH-dh (Zn: No. AB936819, Cp:

172 Cp_TR49774), using GeNorm (Vandesomple et al. 2002) and NormFinder (Andersen et al.

173 2004). EF1-alpha was selected in all real-time qPCR analyses performed in this study (Table

174 S2). Real-time qPCR analysis was performed in biological triplicates. Statistical analysis was

175 performed using Mann−Whitney's U test for comparison between a target gene and GFP

176 RNAi treatment using statistical software Mac Statistical Analysis ver. 2.0 (Esumi, Tokyo,

177 Japan). For Z. nevadensis, prior to the use of ANOVA, we performed the Browne-Forsythe

178 test on the variance equality using statistical software R v. 3.1.2 (Ihaka and Gentleman 1996).

179

180 Data availability

181 The authors have uploaded supplementary materials to figshare. The authors affirm that all

182 data necessary for confirming the conclusion of the article are present within the article and

183 supplementary material.

184

9

185 Results

186 JHA treatment in C. punctulatus and Z. nevadensis

187 In the Class 1 nymphs (3rd or 4th instars) of C. punctulatus, the rates of nymphal molts

188 within 30 days were significantly higher in the JHA treated individuals than in the acetone

189 controls (76.7% and 10.0%, respectively, p < 0.01; Fig. 1). Additionally, JHA treatments in

190 the Class 2 nymphs (5th instars) resulted in the similar tendencies (JHA: 66.7%, acetone:

191 20%, p < 0.01; Fig. 1). In Z. nevadensis, most JHA treated individuals (85.0%) molted into

192 presoldiers within 30 days, whereas no molted presoldiers were observed in the control

193 treatment (Fig. 1). These results are consistent with previous reports (Miura et al. 2003; Itano

194 and Maekawa 2008; Saiki et al. 2014).

195

196 RNAi of JH signaling genes under the JHA treatment in C. punctulatus and Z.

197 nevadensis

198 RNA interference (RNAi) of JH signaling genes was performed in the JHA-treated

199 individuals of Z. nevadensis and C. punctulatus. First, in Z. nevadensis, significant RNAi

200 knockdown effects were observed in ZnMet, ZnSRC and ZnKr-h1, compared to the GFP

201 control (25.80, 52.62 and 39.00%, respectively; Fig. S1). Knockdown of ZnMet strongly

202 inhibited the presoldier molts, and only one tenth of individuals molted into presoldier-like

203 individuals with smaller head capsules and shorter mandibles, compared to the control (Fig.

204 2). Knockdown of ZnSRC showed similar results, and only one in ten termites molted into a

205 presoldier-like individual (Fig. 2). However, ZnKr-h1 RNAi did not have a significant effect

206 on the molts, and seven of ten individuals molted into presoldiers with normal morphological

207 characters (Fig. 2). JHA-induced molting rates under ZnMet RNAi were significantly higher

10

208 when dsRNA was injected 3-5 days after the JHA treatment (day 3-5), compared to those just

209 before the treatment (day 0) (Fig. S2). The former molted individuals possessed the enlarged

210 mandibles of normal presoldiers (Fig. S2).

211

212 In C. punctulatus, significant RNAi knockdown effects were observed in CpMet and

213 CpKr-h1 compared to the GFP control (41.99 and 51.31%, respectively; Fig. S1). CpMet

214 RNAi strongly inhibited the nymphal molts, and only one in ten individuals molted into the

215 next instar. CpKr-h1 RNAi, however, did not have a significant effect on the nymphal molts,

216 and 60% of individuals molted into a subsequent instar (Fig. S3).

217

218 Expression of 20E synthesis and signaling genes under the Met RNAi

219 Changes in expression levels of 20E related genes in the JHA-treated individuals were

220 observed under the Met RNAi both in Z. nevadensis and C. punctulatus. In Z. nevadensis,

221 ZnMet knockdown significantly inhibited the expression levels of two 20E synthesis genes

222 (ZnShr and ZnSpo) and seven signaling genes including 20E receptor gene (ZnEcR, ZnE63,

223 ZnE74, ZnE75, ZnHR3, ZnHR39 and ZnHR96) (Fig. 3). On the other hand, in C. punctulatus,

224 expression levels of different 20E synthesis genes (CpNvd and CpDib) were decreased by

225 CpMet RNAi treatment (Fig. 4). Although expression of some 20E signaling genes (CpE63,

226 CpHR3 and CpHR96) were negatively affected by the CpMet RNAi as shown in Z.

227 nevadensis, expression levels of CpEcR, CpE74, CpE75 and CpHR39 were not significantly

228 decreased by the RNAi treatment (Fig. 4).

229

11

230 RNAi of 20E synthesis and signaling genes during JHA-induced presoldier

231 differentiation

232 RNAi of 20E synthesis (ZnShr and ZnSpo) and signaling genes (ZnEcR, ZnHR3, ZnE74,

233 ZnE75 and ZnHR39) was performed during artificial presoldier differentiation (Fig. 5).

234 Expression levels of each of these genes except HR3 were negatively affected by Met RNAi

235 in Z. nevadensis, but not in C. punctulatus. Consequently, these expression changes might

236 have crucial roles in presoldier-specific molting events. Expression levels of HR3 were

237 significantly decreased by Met RNAi in both species, and thus HR3 might have a similar role

238 in their molting processes. The expression levels of ZnSpo, ZnE75, ZnHR3 and ZnHR39 were

239 also significantly repressed by ZnSRC RNAi treatment, however ZnKr-h1 RNAi did not

240 affect expression levels of any gene examined (Fig. S4). RNAi treatment of ZnShr and ZnE74

241 did not affect JHA-induced presoldier differentiation, similar to those of GFP controls.

242 ZnSpo and ZnE75 RNAi significantly inhibited the molting process, but were nevertheless

243 treated with JHA. Although knockdown of ZnEcR and ZnHR3 did not affect the rate of gut

244 purged individuals (those that eliminate their gut contents before molt), all injected

245 individuals failed to shed old cuticles (0% molting rate). Interestingly, ZnHR39 RNAi did not

246 inhibit the molting process, but the molted individuals possessed worker-like phenotypes

247 with shorter mandibles and smaller head capsules.

248

249 Discussion

250 Termites and Cryptocercus possess a similar JH dependent molting system

251 Molting events were caused by the JHA treatments not only in Z. nevadensis (presoldier

252 differentiation) but also in C. punctulatus (nymphal molts), suggesting that in these taxa, JH

12

253 has a role in activating the molting process. Generally, JH has an inhibitory role in molting

254 via the repression of PTTH secretion and subsequent 20E synthesis (Gilbert 2012). In the

255 german cockroach B. germanica, JHA treatment delays nymphal molt via inhibition of 20E

256 synthesis (Hangartner and Masner 1973; Masner et al. 1975). In some lepidopteran species,

257 however, JH can activate the prothoracic gland during pupation (Hiruma et al. 1978;

258 Cymborowski and Stolaz 1979). Moreover, in the damp-wood termite Hodotermopsis

259 sjostedti, JHA induced growth in the prothoracic gland of pseudergates (Cornette et al. 2008).

260 Recent phylogenetic analyses strongly supported a monophyly of termites within the

261 cockroach clade and sister-group relationships between termites and Cryptocercus

262 cockroaches (Bourguignon et al. 2017). Although further JH treatment assay on some

263 cockroach species are needed, there is a possibility that a role for JH in the activation of the

264 molting process is possessed by both termites and Cryptocercus cockroaches.

265

266 Role of JH signaling genes in termites and Cryptocercus

267 In both Z. nevadensis and C. punctulatus, knockdown of JH receptor, Met, inhibited the

268 molting event instigated by JHA treatment of non-adult individuals. In addition,

269 presoldier-specific morphogenesis (e.g. elongation of mandibles) was also inhibited by Met

270 RNAi in Z. nevadensis. These phenotypic effects were similar to those when RNAi of insulin

271 receptor gene was performed in H. sjostedti (Hattori et al. 2013). Surprisingly, however,

272 knockdown of the Met target gene, Kr-h1, had no influence on the JHA-induced molting rates

273 in both termites and woodroaches, nor morphogenetic changes in termites. These results

274 suggest that the JHA-inducible process of molting (and also specific morphogenesis in

275 termites) is activated via a JH receptor non-Kr-h1 signaling pathway. During metamorphosis

13

276 in holometabolous insects, JH acts to maintain “developmental status quo” in the larval stage

277 via Kr-h1 pathway (Minakuchi et al. 2009). Kr-h1 works as an important early transcription

278 factor within the JH signaling pathway, and is known to be involved in other JH-triggered

279 phenomena such as ovarian development in T. castaneum and Locusta migratoria (Minakuchi

280 et al. 2009; Konopova et al. 2011; Kayukawa et al. 2012). However, in the linden bug P.

281 apterus, Kr-h1 had little influence on ovarian development (Song et al. 2014). Further

282 investigations are needed to determine whether there is a non-Kr-h1 signaling pathway for

283 the JH-inducible process of molting in termites and woodroaches, and in the specific

284 morphogenesis found in termites.

285

286 Met regulates expression of 20E synthesis and signaling genes in both species

287 Met knockdown repressed expression levels of some 20E related genes under JHA

288 application both in Z. nevadensis and C. punctulatus. The expressions of the different 20E

289 synthesis genes were inhibited by Met knockdown in Z. nevadensis (ZnShr and ZnSpo) and C.

290 punctulatus (CpNvd and CpDib). There is a possibility that Met is involved in 20E synthesis

291 activity via expression changes of different synthesis genes in the prothoracic glands of

292 termites and Cryptocercus (Fig. 6). A notable difference was also observed between the two

293 species, when the expression levels of 20E related genes were examined after Met RNAi.

294 Expression levels of ZnEcR, ZnE74, ZnE75, and ZnHR39 were significantly repressed after

295 ZnMet RNAi in Z. nevadensis but no significant decreased levels were observed after CpMet

296 RNAi in C. punctulatus. One possibility is that such differences in 20E-related gene

297 expression changes via JH action may be related to soldier-specific morphogenesis in

298 termites. RNAi-mediated function analysis was performed in this study to clarify this

14

299 possibility.

300

301 The function of 20E related genes in termites

302 Expression levels of both ZnHR3 and CpHR3 were significantly decreased by Met RNAi in

303 the JHA-treated individuals. RNAi of ZnHR3 resulted in the failure of ecdysis, and all

304 molting individuals died before the completion of ecdysis as shown in other insects

305 (Tribolium castaneum, Tan and Palli 2008a; Locusta migratoria, Zhao et al. 2018), including

306 cockroaches (B. germanica, Cruz et al. 2007). These results suggest that an ecdysis related

307 function of HR3 is conserved among insects and its expression occurs under JH signaling

308 both in Z. nevadensis and C. punctulatus. To clarify the specific role of JH receptor signaling

309 for 20E-related gene expression changes in termites, functional analyses of genes with

310 different expression patterns after ZnMet and CpMet RNAi were performed. ZnShr and

311 ZnE74 knockdown treatments did not have any significant effects on presoldier

312 differentiation, and resulted in phenotypes similar to those found in the GFP control. These

313 genes may not have an important role for the molting event accompanied with morphological

314 changes. ZnSpo and ZnE75 RNAi resulted in the inhibition of molting, although the

315 individuals were treated with enough JHA to induce the presoldier molt. In Bombyx mori,

316 E75 was involved in the activation of expression of 20E synthesis genes including Spo (Li et

317 al. 2016). In the early process of termite presoldier molting, Spo may have a critical role in

318 20E synthesis under JH signaling via E75 expression (Fig. 6). ZnEcR RNAi resulted in a

319 failure of the shedding of old cuticle, although a newly formed cuticle was generated under

320 the old cuticle, as shown in the presoldier-soldier molt in Z. nevadensis (Masuoka and

321 Maekawa 2016a), the imaginal molt in B. germanica (Cruz et al. 2006) and the larval molt in

15

322 T. castaneum (Tan and Palli 2008b). On the other hand, ZnHR39 RNAi produced a unique

323 effect and the newly molted worker-like individuals had no presoldier-specific

324 morphogenesis. In holometabolous species, orphan nuclear receptor gene, HR39 (FTZ-F1β),

325 had multiple functions in metamorphosis including neuronal remodeling and muscle

326 generation (Tan and Palli 2008a; Boulanger et al. 2011; Zirin et al. 2013). Present results

327 strongly suggest that termite HR39 is necessary for the drastic morphological changes that

328 occur during soldier differentiation (Fig. 6). Note that these changes in termites can be

329 produced under the high levels of JH that result from artificial JHA treatment, whereas a

330 metamorphosis in holometabolous insects is initiated by a reduction of larval JH titer. An

331 important future topic will be to determine the differences in the JH-HR39 regulatory

332 mechanism between termites (soldier differentiation) and holometabola (metamorphosis).

333

334 Conclusion

335 In this study, a comparative analysis of the role of the JH signaling pathway during molting

336 was done in termites (Z. nevadensis) and sister group woodroaches (C. punctulatus). The

337 results showed that JH-inducible molting via receptor (Met) occurred in both termites

338 (presoldier differentiation) and woodroaches (nymphal molt). Further, termite 20E signaling

339 gene HR39 is expressed under JH signaling via Met, and has a crucial function in presoldier

340 morphogenesis. The present study provides important insights into the proximate

341 mechanisms of soldier evolution in termites. Namely, two crucial changes might be necessary

342 for the evolution of termite soldiers: 1) the acquisition of a molting activation mechanism

343 induced by high levels of JH (a feature shared by termites and woodroaches), and 2) a novel

344 mediation between JH receptor and 20E signalings for specific morphogenesis (only in

16

345 termites). Although some caution should be exercised when using the German cockroach B.

346 germanica as a baseline for comparisons with termites, recent in-depth transcriptome analysis

347 showed consistent expression patterns of 20E related genes among B. germanica and termites

348 (Harrison et al. 2018). Furthermore, we recently clarified that TGFβ signaling is involved in

349 the mediation between JH and 20E pathways during soldier differentiation (Masuoka et al.

350 2018). These insights also support that a novel 20E signaling role might trigger a soldier

351 evolution within the cockroach clade.

352

353 Acknowledgement

354 We are grateful to the director and staff of Mountain Lake Biological Station for permission

355 to collect Cryptocercus punctulatus on the grounds. Thanks are also due to Takumi

356 Kayukawa and Tetsuro Shinoda for productive discussions. This study was supported in part

357 by Grants-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows (Nos. JP15J10817 and JP17J06352 to YM) and Scientific

358 Research (Nos. JP25128705 and JP16K07511 to KM) from the Japan Society for the

359 Promotion of Science.

360

361 References

362 Andersen, C. L., J. L. Jensen, and T. F. Ørntoft, 2004 Normalization of real-time quantitative

363 reverse transcription-PCR data: a model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes

364 suited for normalization, applied to bladder and cancer data sets. Cancer Res. 64: 5245-5250.

365

366 Aribi, A., G. Smagghe, S. Lakbar, N. Soltani-Mazouni, and N. Soltani, 2006 Effects of

367 pyriproxyfen, a juvenile hormone analog, on development of the mealworm, Tenebrio molitor.

17

368 Pestic Biochem. Phys. 84: 55-62.

369

370 Berger, E. M., K. Goudie, L. Klieger, M. Berger, and R. Decato, 1992 The juvenile hormone

371 analogue, methoprene, inhibits ecdysterone induction of small heat shock protein gene

372 expression. Dev. Biol. 151: 410-418.

373

374 Boulanger, A., C. Clouet-Redt, M. Farge, A. Flandre, T. J. P. Guignard et al., 2011 ftz-f1 and

375 Hr39 opposing roles on EcR expression during Drosophila mushroom body neuron

376 remodeling. Nat. Neurosci. 14: 37-44.

377

378 Bourguignon, T., Q. Tang, S. Y. Ho, F. Juna, Z. Wang et al., 2017 Transoceanic dispersal

379 and plate tectonics shaped global cockroach distributions: evidence from mitochondrial

380 phylogenomics. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35: 970-983.

381

382 Cornette, R., S. Koshikawa, and T. Miura, 2008 Histology of the hormone-producing glands

383 in the damp-wood termite Hodotermopsis sjostedti (Isoptera: ): A focus on

384 soldier differentiation. Insect. Soc. 55: 407-416.

385

386 Cruz, J., D. Mané-Padrós, X. Bellés, and D. Martín, 2006 Functions of the ecdysone receptor

387 isoform-A in the hemimetabolous insect Blattella germanica revealed by systemic RNAi in

388 vivo. Dev. Biol. 297: 158-171.

389

18

390 Cruz, J., D. Martín, and X. Bellés, 2007 Redundant ecdysis regulatory functions of three

391 nuclear receptor HR3 isoforms in the direct-developing insect Blattella germanica. Mech.

392 Dev. 124: 180-189.

393

394 Cymborowski, B., and G. Stolarz, 1979 The role of juvenile hormone during larval-pupal

395 transformation of Spodoptera littoralis: Switchover in the sensitivity of the prothoracic gland

396 to juvenile hormone. J. Insect Physiol. 25: 939-942.

397

398 Dubrovskaya, V. A., E. M. Berger, and E. B. Dubrovsky, 2004 Juvenile hormone regulation

399 of the E75 nuclear receptor is conserved in Diptera and Lepidoptera. Gene 340: 171-177.

400

401 Gilbert, I. L., 2012 Insect endocrinology. Academic Press, New York

402

403 Hangartner, W., and P. Masner, 1973 Juvenile hormone: Inhibition of ecdysis in larvae of the

404 german cockroach, Blattella germanica. Experientia 9: 1358-1359.

405

406 Harrison, M. C., E. Jongepier, H. M. Robertson, N. Arninget, T. Bitard-Feildel et al., 2018

407 Hemimetabolous genomes reveal molecular basis of termite eusociality. Nature Ecol. Evol. 2:

408 557.

409

410 Hattori, A., Y. Sugime, C. Sasa, H. Miyakawa, Y. Ishikawa et al., 2013 Soldier

411 morphogenesis in the damp-wood termite is regulated by the insulin signaling pathway. J.

412 Exp. Zool. B. Mol. Dev. Evol. 320: 295-306.

19

413

414 Hayashi, Y., K. Maekawa, C. A. Nalepa, T. Miura, and S. Shigenobu, 2017 Transcriptome

415 sequencing and estimation of DNA methylation level in the subsocial wood-feeding

416 cockroach Cryptocercus punctulatus (: Cryptocercidae). Applied Entomol.

417 Zool. 52: 643-651.

418

419 Hiruma, K., H. Shimada, and S. Yagi, 1978 Activation of the prothoracic gland by juvenile

420 hormone and prothoracicotropic hormone in Mamestra brassicae. J. Insect Physiol. 24:

421 215-220.

422

423 Ihaka, R., and R. Gentleman, 1996 R: A language for data analysis and graphics. J. Comput.

424 Graph. Stat. 5: 299-314.

425

426 Inward, D., G. Beccaloni, and P. Eggleton, 2007 Death of an order: a comparative molecular

427 phylogenetic study confirms that termites are eusocial cockroaches. Biol. Lett. 3: 331-335.

428

429 Itano, H., and K. Maekawa, 2008 Soldier differentiation and larval juvenile hormone

430 sensitivity in an incipient colony of the damp wood termite Zootermopsis nevadensis

431 (Isoptera, Termopsidae). Sociobiology 51: 151-162.

432

433 Jindra, M., X. Bellés, and T. Shinoda, 2015 Molecular basis of juvenile hormone signaling.

434 Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 11: 39-46.

435

20

436 Kayukawa, T., C. Minakuchi, T. Namiki, T. Togawa, M. Yoshiyama et al., 2012

437 Transcriptional regulation of juvenile hormone-mediated induction of Krüppel homolog 1, a

438 repressor of insect metamorphosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 109: 11729-11734.

439

440 Konopova, B., and M. Jindra, 2007 Juvenile hormone resistance gene Methoprene-tolerant

441 controls entry into metamorphosis in the beetle Tribolium castaneum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

442 USA 104: 10488-10493.

443

444 Konopova, B., V. Smykal, and M. Jindra, 2011 Common and distinct roles of juvenile

445 hormone signaling genes in metamorphosis of holometabolous and hemimetabolous insects.

446 PLoS One 6: e28728.

447

448 Li, K., L. Tian, Z. Guo, S. Guo, J. Zhang et al., 2016 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E) primary

449 response gene E75 isoforms mediate steroidogenesis autoregulation and regulate

450 developmental timing in Bombyx. J. Biol. Chem. 291: 18163-18175.

451

452 Lo N, G. Tokuda, H. Watanabe, H. Rose, M. Slaytor et al., 2000 Evidence from multiple gene

453 sequences indicates that termites evolved from wood-feeding cockroaches. Curr. Biol. 10:

454 801-804.

455

456 Lozano, J., and X. Bellés, 2011 Conserved repressive function of Krüppel homolog 1 on

457 insect metamorphosis in hemimetabolous and holometabolous species. Sci. Rep. 1: 163.

458

21

459 Lozano, J., and X. Bellés, 2014 Role of Methoprene-tolerant (Met) in adult morphogenesis

460 and in adult ecdysis of Blattella germanica. PLoS One 9: e103614.

461

462 Masner, P., W. Hangartner, and M. Suchy, 1975 Reduced titers of ecdysone following

463 juvenile hormone treatment in the german cockroach, Blattella germanica. J. Insect Physiol.

464 21: 1755-1762.

465

466 Masuoka, Y., H. Yaguchi, R. Suzuki, and K. Maekawa, 2015 Knockdown of the juvenile

467 hormone receptor gene inhibits soldier-specific morphogenesis in the damp-wood termite

468 Zootermopsis nevadensis (Isoptera: Archotermopsidae). Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 64: 25-31.

469

470 Masuoka, Y., and K. Maekawa, 2016a Ecdysone signaling regulates soldier-specific cuticular

471 pigmentation in the termite Zootermopsis nevadensis. FEBS Lett. 590: 1694-1703.

472

473 Masuoka, Y., and K. Maekawa, 2016b Gene expression changes in the tyrosine metabolic

474 pathway regulate caste-specific cuticular tanning of termites. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 74:

475 21-31.

476

477 Masuoka Y, H. Yaguchi, K. Toga, S. Shigenobu, and K. Maekawa, 2018 TGFβ signaling

478 related genes are involved in hormonal mediation during termite soldier differentiation. PLoS

479 Genet. 14: e1007338.

480

481 Minakuchi, C., T. Namiki, and T. Shinoda, 2009 Krüppel homolog 1, an early juvenile

22

482 hormone-response gene downstream of Methoprene-tolerant, mediates its anti-metamorphic

483 action in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. Dev. Biol. 325: 341–350.

484

485 Miura, T., S. Koshikawa, and T. Matsumoto, 2003 Winged presoldiers induced by a juvenile

486 hormone analog in Zootermopsis nevadensis: implications for plasticity and evolution of

487 caste differentiation in termites. J. Morphol. 257: 22-32.

488

489 Nalepa, C. A., 1984 Colony composition, protozoan transfer and some life history

490 characteristics of the woodroach Cryptocercus punctulatus Scudder (:

491 Cryptocercidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 14: 273-279.

492

493 Nalepa, C. A., 1990 Early development of nymphs and establishment of hindgut symbiosis in

494 Cryptocercus punctulatus (dictyoptera: cryptocercidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 83:

495 766-789.

496

497 Nalepa, C. A., 2011 Altricial development in wood-feeding cockroaches: the key antecedent

498 of termite eusociality, pp. 69-96 in Biology of Termites: a Modern Synthesis, second ed.,

499 edited by D. E. Bignell, Y. Roisin, N. Lo. Springer, New York.

500

501 Noirot, C., 1985 The caste system in higher termites, pp. 75-86. in Caste differentiation in

502 social insects, edited by J. A. L. Watson, B. M. Okot-Kotber, C. Noirot. Pergamon Press,

503 Oxford.

504

23

505 Riddiford, L. M., 2013 How does juvenile hormone control insect metamorphosis and

506 reproduction? Gen. Comp. Endocr. 179: 477-484.

507

508 Roisin, Y., 1996 Castes in humivorous and litter-dwelling neotropical nasute termites

509 (Isoptera: termitidae). Insect. Soc. 43: 375-389.

510

511 Saiki, R., H. Yaguchi, Y. Hashimoto, S. Kawamura, and K. Maekawa, 2014 Reproductive

512 soldier-like individuals induced by juvenile hormone analog treatment in Zootermopsis

513 nevadensis (Isoptera, Archotermopsidae). Zool. Sci. 31: 573-581.

514

515 Scharf, M. E., 2015 Omic research in termites: an overview and a roadmap. Front. Genet. 6:

516 76.

517

518 Smykal, V., A. Bajgar, J. Provaznik, S. Fexova, M. Buricova et al., 2014 Juvenile hormone

519 signaling during reproduction and development of the linden bug, Pyrrhocoris apterus. Insect

520 Biochem. Mol. Biol. 45: 69-76.

521

522 Song, J., Z. Wu, Z. Wang, S. Deng, and S. Zhou, 2014 Krüppel-homolog 1 mediates juvenile

523 hormone action to promote vitellogenesis and oocyte maturation in the migratory locust.

524 Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 52: 94-101.

525

526 Tan, A., and S. R. Palli, 2008a Identification and characterization of nuclear receptors from

527 the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 38: 430-439.

24

528

529 Tan, A., and S. R. Palli, 2008b Edysone receptor isoforms play distinct roles in controlling

530 molting and metamorphosis in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Mol. Cell

531 Endocrinol. 291: 42-49.

532

533 Terrapon, N., C. Li, H. M. Robertson, L. Ji, X. Meng et al., 2014 Molecular traces of alternative

534 social organization in a termite genome. Nat. Commun. 5: 3636.

535

536 Untergasser, A., H. Nijveen, X. Rao, T. Bisseling, R. Greurts et al., 2007 Primer 3 Plus, an

537 enhanced web interface to Primer 3. Nucleic Acids Res. 35: 71-74.

538

539 Vandesomple, J., K. D. Preter, F. Pattyn, B. Poppe, N. V. Roy et al., 2002 Accurate

540 normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by genometric averaging of multiple

541 internal control genes. Genome Biol. 3: 0034:1-0034:11.

542

543 Watanabe, D., H. Gotoh, T. Miura, and K. Maekawa, 2014 Social interactions affecting caste

544 development through physiological actions in termites. Front. Physiol. 5: 127.

545

546 Zhao, X., Z. Qin, W. Liu, X. Liu, B. Moussian et al., 2018 Nuclear receptor HR3 controls

547 locust molt by regulating chitin synthesis and degradation genes of Locusta

548 migratoria. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 92: 1-11.

549

550 Zirin, J., D. Cheng, N. Dhanyasi, J. Cho, J. M. Dura et al., 2013 Ecdysone signaling at

25

551 metamorphosis triggers apoptosis of Drosophila abdominal muscles. Dev. Biol. 383:

552 275-284.

553

554 Zufelato, M. S., M. M. G. Bitondi, Z. L. P. Simoes, and K. Hartfelder, 2000 The juvenile

555 hormone analog pyriproxyfen affects ecdysteroid-dependent cuticle melanization and shifts

556 the pupal ecdysteroid peak in the honey bee (Apis mellifera). Struct. Dev. 29:

557 111-119.

558

559 Figure legends

560 Fig. 1. Results of JH analog (JHA; pyriproxyfen) and acetone (control) treatment in C.

561 punctulatus and Z. nevadensis. Molting rates indicate the ratio of nymphal (C. punctulatus)

562 and presoldier (Z. nevadensis) molt. Asterisks indicate a significant difference (Fisher’s exact

563 test, **P < 0.01).

564

565 Fig. 2. Phenotype of newly molted individual, and molting rate after the dsRNA

566 injection of JH signaling genes under JHA treatment in Z. nevadensis. The fraction on

567 each column indicates number of molted individuals (numerator) and number of treated

568 individuals (denominator). Asterisks indicate significant differences when compared to the

569 control (GFP) (Fisher’s exact test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, n.s. not significant). GP refers to

570 gut purged. External morphologies of the molted individuals are shown in the upper panels.

571 These individuals were photographed 7 days after the molt.

572

573 Fig. 3. Expression levels (mean ± S.D., biological triplicates) of 20E synthesis and

26

574 signaling genes in 0-5 days after JHA treatment under Met RNAi in Z. nevadensis.

575 Expression levels were normalized by EF1a expression. Relative expression levels were

576 calibrated using the mean expression level of individuals just before the JHA treatment (d0)

577 as 1.0. The statistical results of two-way ANOVA are described in each box (*P < 0.05, **P <

578 0.01). The data is consistent with the use of parametric statistics by the Browne-Forsythe test

579 (ZnMet: P = 7.91E-01 (GFP), 5.90E-01 (ZnMet RNAi); ZnNvd: P = 7.88E-01 (GFP),

580 7.91E-01(ZnMet RNAi); ZnShr: P = 5.37E-01 (GFP), 5.89E-01 (ZnMet RNAi); ZnSpo: P =

581 7.77E-01 (GFP), 4.93E-01 (ZnMet RNAi); ZnPhm: P = 4.43E-01 (GFP), 2.89E-01 (ZnMet

582 RNAi); ZnDib: P = 5.24E-01 (GFP), 6.81E-01 (ZnMet RNAi); ZnSad: P = 7.50E-01 (GFP),

583 7.52E-01 (ZnMet RNAi); ZnShd: P = 8.53E-01 (GFP), 9.60E-01 (ZnMet RNAi); ZnEcR: P =

584 9.47E-01 (GFP), 8.75E-01 (ZnMet RNAi); ZnUSP: P = 9.08E-01 (GFP), 4.35E-01 (ZnMet

585 RNAi); ZnBr-C: P = 5.31E-01 (GFP), 2.30E-01 (ZnMet RNAi); ZnE63: P = 8.46E-01 (GFP),

586 6.73E-01 (ZnMet RNAi); ZnE74: P = 8.57E-01 (GFP), 9.93E-01 (ZnMet RNAi); ZnE75: P =

587 9.17E-01 (GFP), 3.02E-01 (ZnMet RNAi); ZnE93: P = 9.99E-01 (GFP), 5.34E-01 (ZnMet

588 RNAi); ZnHR3: P = 2.61E-01 (GFP), 9.48E-01 (ZnMet RNAi); ZnHR4: P = 6.39E-01 (GFP),

589 6.81E-01 (ZnMet RNAi); ZnHR38: P = 6.44E-01 (GFP), 3.78E-01 (ZnMet RNAi); ZnHR39:

590 P = 3.45E-01 (GFP), 4.08E-01 (ZnMet RNAi); ZnHR78: P = 7.95E-01 (GFP), 9.23E-01

591 (ZnMet RNAi); ZnHR96: P = 9.34E-01 (GFP), 6.09E-01 (ZnMet RNAi); ZnFTZ-F1: P =

592 9.88E-01 (GFP), 6.62E-01 (ZnMet RNAi)) prior to the use of the ANOVA. Gene names with

593 significant different expression levels between injected dsRNAs are shown in bold.

594

595 Fig. 4. Expression levels (mean ± S.D., biological triplicates) of 20E synthesis and

596 signaling genes under Met RNAi in C. punctulatus. Expression levels were normalized by

27

597 EF1a expression. Relative expression levels were calibrated using the mean expression level

598 of GFP dsRNA-injected individuals as 1.0. Asterisks denote significant differences

599 (Mann−Whitney's U test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, n.s. not significant).

600

601 Fig. 5. Phenotype of newly molted individual, and molting and gut-purging rate after

602 the dsRNA injection of 20E synthesis and signaling genes under JHA treatment in Z.

603 nevadensis. The fraction on each column indicates number of molted or gut purged

604 individuals (numerator) and number of treated individuals (denominator). Asterisks indicate

605 significant differences when compared to the control (GFP) (Fisher’s exact test, *P < 0.05,

606 **P < 0.01, n.s. not significant). External morphologies of the molted individuals are shown

607 in the upper panels. These individuals were photographed 7 days after the molt. No molting

608 individuals were obtained by ZnEcR and ZnHR3 RNAi, but all gut purged individuals died

609 just before the molt, because of a failure of the shedding of old cuticle, as shown in the upper

610 panel.

611

612 Fig. 6. Hypothetical pathway of JH signaling in woodroaches and termites. A common

613 pathway involved in 20E synthesis may control a downstream molting process via the JH

614 receptor. In termites, soldier-specific morphogenesis may be regulated by a specific JH

615 receptor pathway, probably involved in the 20E signaling genes including HR39.

616

617 SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURES/TABLES

618

619 Figure S1. Expression levels (mean ± S.D., biological triplicates) of target genes after

28

620 RNAi treatments in Z. nevadensis (A) and C. punctulatus (B). Expression levels were

621 normalized by EF1a expression. Relative expression levels were calibrated using the mean

622 expression level of GFP dsRNA-injected individuals as 1.0. Asterisks denote significant

623 differences (Mann−Whitney's U test, *P < 0.05).

624

625 Figure S2. Phenotype of newly molted individual and molting rate after the ZnMet

626 dsRNA injection 1-5 days after JHA treatment in Z. nevadensis. The fraction on each

627 column indicates number of molted individuals (numerator) and number of treated

628 individuals (denominator). Different letters above the bars denote significant differences

629 (Tukey’s test, P < 0.05). External morphologies of the molted individuals are shown in the

630 upper panels. These individuals were photographed 7 days after the molt.

631

632 Figure S3. Molting rate of Class 1 (3rd or 4th instar) nymphs after the dsRNA injection

633 under JHA treatment in C. punctulatus. The fraction on each column indicates number of

634 molted individuals (numerator) and number of treated individuals (denominator). Asterisks

635 indicate significant differences when compared to the control (GFP) (Fisher’s exact test, **P

636 < 0.01, n.s. not significant).

637

638 Figure S4. Expression levels (mean ± S.D., biological triplicates) of 20E synthesis and

639 signaling genes in 0-5 days after JHA treatment under SRC and Kr-h1 RNAi in Z.

640 nevadensis. Expression levels were normalized by EF1a expression. Relative expression

641 levels were calibrated using the mean expression level of individuals just before the JHA

642 treatment (d0) as 1.0. The statistical results of two-way ANOVA are described in each box

29

643 (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). The data is consistent with the use of parametric statistics by the

644 Browne-Forsythe test (ZnShr: P = 5.37E-01 (GFP), 7.15E-01 (ZnSRC RNAi), 4.76E-01

645 (ZnKr-h1 RNAi); ZnSpo: P = 7.77E-01 (GFP), 5.90E-01 (ZnSRC RNAi), 7.34E-01 (ZnKr-h1

646 RNAi); ZnEcR: P = 9.47E-01 (GFP), 9.80E-01 (ZnSRC RNAi), 6.65E-01 (ZnKr-h1 RNAi);

647 ZnE74: P = 8.57E-01 (GFP), 7.45E-01 (ZnSRC RNAi), 3.72E-01 (ZnKr-h1 RNAi); ZnE75: P

648 = 9.17E-01 (GFP), 7.78E-01 (ZnSRC RNAi), 6.68E-01 (ZnKr-h1 RNAi); ZnHR3: P =

649 2.61E-01 (GFP), 7.26E-01 (ZnSRC RNAi), 5.81E-01 (ZnKr-h1 RNAi); ZnHR39: P =

650 3.45E-01 (GFP), 4.77E-01 (ZnSRC RNAi), 6.93E-01 (ZnKr-h1 RNAi)) prior to the use of the

651 ANOVA.

652

653 Table S1

654 Sequences of primers used in this study.

655

656 Table S2

657 Ranking and stability values of reference genes using GeNorm and NormFinder.

658 659 Z. nevadensis 100 **

50 molting rate (%) 0/20 17/20 0 control JHA

C. punctulatus control (acetone) 100 JHA (pyriproxyfen) ** **

50 molting rate (%)

3/30 23/30 2/10 20/30 0 Class 1 Class 2 (3rd of 4th instar) (5 instar)

Fig.1 GFP ZnMet RNAi ZnSRCRNAi ZnKr-h1RNAi

80 * n.s. 70 * 60 (%) 50 40 30 20 10

molting rate 0 12/20 2/20 1/10 7/10

GFP ZnMet ZnSRC ZnKr-h1

Fig. 2 ZnMet gene:7.9E-04** day:2.6E-04 ** inter.:2.5E-01

4

2 GFP RNAi ZnMet 0 d0 d1 d2 d3 d4 d5

20E synthesis genes 20E signaling genes

ZnNvd gene:7.4E-01 day:1.3E-05** inter.:2.9E-01 gene:2.0E-04** day:7.2E-03** inter.:2.8E-01 gene:2.4E-02* day:1.8E-01 inter.:4.8E-01 12 6 ZnEcR ZnHR3 16

3 6 8

0 0 0 ZnShr gene:1.5E-02* day:3.2E-01 inter.:5.1E-01 5 ZnUSP gene:2.1E-01 day:1.2E-03** inter.:9.1E-01 ZnHR4 gene:1.2E-01 day:7.8E-03** inter.:2.4E-01 6 12

2.5 3 6

0 0 0 2 ZnSpo gene:3.4E-02* day:3.5E-01 inter.:6.5E-01 ZnBr-C gene:1.8E-01 day:1.4E-01 inter.:9.6E-01 ZnHR38 gene:7.1E-01 day:1.9E-03** inter.:7.0E-01 40 2

1 1 20

0 0 0 gene:1.9E-01 day:3.2E-01 inter.:3.7E-01 gene:8.1E-03** day:7.6E-03** inter.:5.9E-01 ZnPhm ZnE63 gene:8.8E-03** day:1.5E-02* inter.:6.6E-01 ZnHR39 3 2 3

1 1.5 1.5

0 0 0 1.6 ZnDib gene:2.8E-01 day:3.8E-01 inter.:3.4E-01 ZnE74 gene:1.0E-02* day:5.2E-01 inter.:2.7E-01 4 ZnHR78 gene:5.0E-01 day:1.5E-05** inter.:4.1E-01 3

0.8 2 1.5

Relative expression (/ EF1a ) 0 0 0 1.6 ZnSad gene:9.4E-01 day:4.5E-01 inter.:6.3E-01 12 ZnE75 gene:2.2E-04** day:1.0E-05** inter.:4.1E-01 1.6 ZnHR96 gene:2.9E-02* day:6.7E-02 inter.:1.3E-01

0.8 6 0.8

0 0 0 8 ZnShd gene:3.3E-01 day:4.3E-01 inter.:9.8E-01 5 ZnE93 gene:7.7E-01 day:1.8E-03* inter.:4.0E-01 ZnFTZ-F1 gene:6.7E-01 day:9.5E-02* inter.:4.0E-01 4

2.5 4 2

0 0 0 Fig.3 d0 d1 d2 d3 d4 d5 d0 d1 d2 d3 d4 d5 d0 d1 d2 d3 d4 d5 * GFP RNAi CpMet

n.s. n.s. * ** n.s. ** ** * n.s. ** n.s. 1 Relative expression (/ EF1a )

0

CpDib CpMet CpNvd CpShr CpSpo CpEcR CpE63 CpE74 CpE75 CpHR3 CpHR39 CpHR96 synthesis genes signaling genes

Fig.4 GFP ZnShr RNAi ZnEcR RNAi ZnE75 RNAi ZnE74 RNAi ZnHR39 RNAi ZnHR3RNAi ZnSpoRNAi

did not molt

70 n.s. 60

(%) 50 n.s. n.s. 40 30 20 10 ** ** * ** 12/20 4/10 0/10 0/10 6/10 1/10 0/10 8/20 molting rate 0

70 n.s. n.s. n.s. 60 (%) 50 n.s. n.s. 40 30 20 10 ** * 12/20 4/10 0/10 6/10 6/10 1/10 6/10 8/20 0 gut-purging rate

GFP ZnShr ZnSpo ZnEcR ZnE74 ZnE75 ZnHR3 ZnHR39 synthesis genes signaling genes

Fig.5 Woodroaches Termites (C. punctulatus) (Z. nevadensis) High JH High JH

Receptor Receptor Met/(SRC?) Met/SRC

termite Ecdysone Ecdysone specific pathway synthesisKr-h1+ signal synthesis + signal Ecdysone signal (Nvd, Dib?) (E63, HR3, HR96?) (Spo) (EcR, E75, HR3) (HR39)

morphological molt molt modification

Nymphal Soldier molt differentiation

Fig.6