1
Evolution and Ecology of Termite Nesting Behavior and Its Impact on Disease Susceptibility
A dissertation presented by
Marielle Aimée Postava-Davignon
to
The Department of Biology
In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
Doctor of Philosophy
in the field of
Biology
Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts
April, 2010
2
Evolution and Ecology of Termite Nesting Behavior and Its Impact on Disease Susceptibility
by
Marielle Aimée Postava-Davignon
ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION
Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of
Philosophy in Biology in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Northeastern
University, April, 2010
3
Abstract
Termites construct nests that are often structurally species-specific. They exhibit a high diversity of nest structures, but their nest evolution is largely unknown. Current hypotheses for the factors that influenced nest evolution include adaptations that improved nest thermoregulation, defense against predators, and competition for limited nest sites. Studies have shown a lower prevalence of pathogens and parasites in arboreal nesting animal species compared to ground nesters. Nest building behavior is plastic and can adapt to changing environments. As termites can detect and avoid pathogens, I hypothesized that the evolution of arboreal termite nests was an adaptation to avoid infection. To test this, bacteria and fungi from nest cores, trails, and surrounding soils of the arboreal nesting Nasutitermes acajutlae were cultured. Abiotic factors such as temperature, relative humidity, and light were measured to elucidate how they influenced the interactions between termites and microbes. Fungi associated with N. acajutlae were identified to determine the potential pathogenic pressures these termites encounter in their nest as compared to the external environment. To determine the effect of nest structure on survival, termites representing the one-piece (Zootermopsis angusticollis),
intermediate (Reticulitermes flavipes) and separate (Nasutitermes corniger) type nests
were exposed to the fungal entomopathogen Metarhizium anisopliae, and the termites’ survival tracked over a 20-day period in five different artificial nest architectures. A protected nest environment and the benefits of socially mediated immunity within those nests have also been implicated in promoting termite eusocial evolution. In order to test whether immune protein production is socially induced in termites, the SDS-PAGE
4protein profiles of naïve Z. angusticollis nymphs, and nestmates directly exposed to M.
anisopliae were examined following social contact. The results presented in this dissertation demonstrate that arboreal termites have lower nest microbial loads and diversity compared to surrounding soils, and that the degree of social contact as influenced by nest architecture can significantly affect termite survival. This research suggests that pathogens played a role in furthering evolution and ecology of termite nesting behavior, and lays the groundwork for future studies in this area.
5
This dissertation is dedicated to my family.
To my parents, who have loved and supported me through all my endeavors. To my sisters, who have given me invaluable guidance, strength, and love. To my brothers-in-law, who watch over and care for me like a true sister.
To my niece, whose laughter and bright smile helped get me through tough times.
I love you all, and could not have done this without you.
6
Acknowledgements
I would like to express my gratitude to the many people without whom this research would not have been possible. My advisor, Rebeca Rosengaus, who introduced me to and led me through the wonderful world of termites, a place to which I otherwise would never have known I truly belonged. My collaborator Claire Fuller for six years of exciting field research, and friendship. My committee members Wendy Smith, Jacqueline Piret and Gwilym Jones for their advice and support. Mark Bulmer for his expertise, and camaraderie. John Stiller and Erica Waddle for their work on fungal identifications. My fellow graduate students Tamara Hartke, Kelley Schultheis, and Lindsey Reichheld for their input and shoulders to lean on. Comfort Chieh and Danny Dijohnson for culturing countless bacterial and fungal samples. Kayla Hamilton and Charlie Ferranti for their work on the Nasutitermes portion of the nest architecture project. Earthwatch SCAP girls 2005-2008 for their hard work in the field on St. John. All other Rosengaus lab members, and graduate students past and present: you are a rare and genuinely fine group of people, and it has been a pleasure working with you.
Thank you to Huddart and Redwood Regional Parks, and the Smithsonian
Tropical Research Institute for termite collections. Kim Seefeld and the R Development Core Team for assistance with statistics. The Northeastern Biology Department and NSF GK-12 program for financial support. This research was funded by an NSF-CAREER grant (DEB 0447316) awarded to Rebeca Rosengaus, an NSF grant (IBN-0116857) awarded to James Traniello and Rebeca Rosengaus, and by the Durfee Foundation through the Earthwatch Student Challenge Awards Program.
7
Contents
Abstract
26
Acknowledgements Contents
7
List of Figures List of Tables
9
11 12
- 1
- Introduction
1.1 Ancestry and eusocial evolution 1.2 Termites in the fossil record
13 15 16 19 20 22 26 28
1.3 Nest types, classifications, and associated levels of sociality 1.4 Nest building behavior 1.5 Nest evolution 1.6 Selective pressures acting on nest evolution 1.7 Pathogenic pressures and the evolution of eusociality 1.8 Central aims
- 2
- Dynamic interactions between the arboreal Caribbean termite
Nasutitermes acajutlae (Holmgren), its associated microbial communities, and the environment
33
2.1 Introduction 2.2 Methods 2.3 Results
34 37 42
8
- 2.4 Discussion
- 60
3456
Fungi naturally associated with the arboreal nesting Caribbean termite Nasutitermes acajutlae (Holmgren)
66
3.1 Introduction 3.2 Methods 3.3 Results
67 69 72
- 73
- 3.4 Discussion
The effect of nest architecture on termite susceptibility to a fungal pathogen
87
4.1 Introduction 4.2 Methods 4.3 Results
88 95
103
- 111
- 4.4 Discussion
Social induction of hemolymph proteins in the dampwood termite Zootermopsis angusticollis (Holmgren)
119
5.1 Introduction 5.2 Methods 5.3 Results
120 123 130
- 139
- 5.4 Discussion
Overall discussion and conclusions
144 150
Literature Cited
9
List of Figures
- 1.1
- Figure modified from Eggleton and Tayasu (2001) depicting the eight
- lifeways of termites
- 30
43 43 44
2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4
Nasutitermes acajutlae arboreal carton nest Collecting Nasutitermes acajutlae in the field
LogTag data loggers Examples of fungi cultured from Hurricane Hole trail material
- on thiostrepton PDA
- 49
50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 78
2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9
Mean log transformed cuticular bacterial CFUs/SA ± SE Mean log transformed substrate bacterial CFUs/g ± SE Mean log transformed cuticular fungal CFUs/SA ± SE Mean log transformed substrate fungal CFUs/g ± SE Correlations between microbial numbers and temperature
2.10 Mean nest (core), ambient (trail) and soil temperatures ± SE 2.11 Example traces from LogTag data loggers 2.12 Correlation between numbers of fungi and amount of light 2.13 Mean nest (core), ambient (trail) and soil % moisture ± SE 3.1 3.2
Examples of fungal genera associated with Nasutitermes acajutlae Fungal genera and number of occurrences in core, trail, and surrounding soil samples of Nasutitermes acajutlae individuals and nests Relative similarities of fungi among Nasutitermes acajutlae nests located in different habitats
80 81
3.3
10
- 86
- 3.4
4.1 4.2 4.3
Nodules in a fallen nest of Nasutitermes acajutlae
- Natural nests of termites
- 94
- Example artificial nest architectures
- 101
Survival distributions resulting from Cox regressions as a function of treatment (a), species (b), and nest architecture (c) Survival distributions as a function of nest architecture Summary of survival across the five nest architectures for
Zootermopsis angusticollis (Za), Reticulitermes flavipes (Rf) and Nasutitermes corniger (Nc)
106
- 108
- 4.4
4.5
109
- 110
- 4.6
5.1
Median nest temperature (a) and % RH (b) across nest architectures Diagram depicting the timing of hemolymph extractions one and two,
- and the combinations of treatment groups
- 131
134 135
5.2 5.3 5.4
Example hemolymph protein profiles from a NCE individual Median masses of new proteins across direct exposure treatments Median numbers of new proteins per individual across direct exposure
- treatments
- 136
137 138
5.5 5.6
Median masses of new proteins across naïve treatments Median numbers of new proteins per individual across naïve treatments
11
List of Tables
- 1.1
- A comparison of traits used as indicators of social complexity in
- termites and their subsocial ancestors
- 31
32 48 59 74
1.2 2.1 2.2 3.1 3.2
Selective forces implicated in the evolution of social insect nests Final regression model outputs for bacterial (A) and fungal (B) CFUs Climatological data for the U.S. Virgin Islands Identifications of fungi associated with Nasutitermes acajutlae Jaccard coefficients comparing the similarity of core, trail, and soil
- fungal genera
- 77
- 79
- 3.3
4.1
Taxonomic groups of fungi associated with Nasutitermes acajutlae Survival parameters for control and conidia exposed termites of the
- three study species
- 107
12
Chapter 1 – Introduction
Termites are eusocial roaches (Inward et al., 2007a) and are unique in that they are the only roaches to have evolved eusociality. Termites are of particular interest in studies of eusociality because 1) they are the only insects to have developed eusociality outside the order Hymenoptera, and 2) unlike Hymenopterans, which have haplo-diploid sex determination, termites are diplo-diploid and thus lack the genetic predispositions for the evolution of sterile castes (Thorne, 1997). Investigating the evolutionary history of termites and eusocial development is difficult due to the lack of extant solitary species within the order Isoptera. Instead, factors promoting eusociality must be inferred through studies of the fossil record, the presocial roach ancestors of termites, and different aspects of the biology of extant species, including the degree of complexity of their nests. Nest building is an innate behavior (Emerson, 1938; Theraulaz et al., 1998, 2003), often resulting in species-specific architectures. These nests are the result of the cooperative effort of a large number of individuals working together to build, organize, and expand the structure. In other words, nests represent an extended phenotype of a superorganism (Dawkins, 1999; Turner, 2004). Studies of extant termites have shown a correlation between increasing sociality and larger colonies with more complex architectures (Eggleton and Tayasu, 2001). When preserved as fossils, nest structures provide a historical record of the degree of social complexity of the builders (Hasiotis, 2003). As such, nests provide a useful tool for indirectly studying eusocial evolution in insects.
Although ubiquitous among social insects, the nests of termites in particular exhibit a wide diversity of structures. This diversity is not only related to differences in
13 social complexity, but also to adaptations evolved in response to the needs of the colony:
defense, food storage, and a homeostatic environment necessary for survival and growth of offspring (Emerson, 1938; Noirot, 1970; Noirot and Darlington, 2000). Evolution of social insect nest architectures across genera has been studied to a certain degree in bees (Eickwort and Sakagami, 1979; Packer, 1991; Franck et al., 2004; Roubik, 2006; Rasmussen and Camargo, 2008), and wasps (Jeanne, 1975; Wenzel, 1991) likely due to the ability to compare a wide range of solitary to eusocial extant species. In ants, evolution of diverse nesting strategies in the genus Polyrhachis has been examined (Robson, 2004; Robson and Kohout, 2005, 2007). Tschinkel (2003, 2004, 2005) and Mikheyev and Tschinkel (2004) have done extensive work on the nest architectures and ontogeny of subterranean ant nests that provide vital information for analysis of trace fossils. However, studies of phylogenetic relationships of termite nests are few, leaving the evolution of the most diverse nest structures largely unexplored (Schmidt 1955, 1958; Abe, 1987; Inward et al., 2007b). This work reviews what is currently known regarding social insect nesting and evolution, explores the interrelationships between pathogens and termites in nests and the role nests play in pathogen resistance, and the possible impact of pathogens as selection pressures in the evolution of termite nesting behavior.
1.1 Ancestry and eusocial evolution
Recent phylogenetic analyses of extinct and extant species have confirmed that roaches of genus Cryptocercus are the living sister group to termites (Lo et al., 2000; Inward et al., 2007a; Engel et al., 2009). Morphologically speaking, Mastotermes darwiniensis Froggatt most closely resembles cryptocercid roaches, and is considered to
14 be the most primitive extant termite. However, in terms of social behavior, the extant
Termopsidae (recently renamed Archotermopsidae by Engel et al., 2009) exhibit the most primitive condition. Similar to members of Archotermopsidae, colonies of C. punctulatus live in networks of mostly horizontal galleries in dead wood of varying decay (Nalepa, 1984). Members of these two taxonomic groups sometimes occupy the same piece of wood, and share similar nesting habits: there is no evidence they leave the nest to forage for food. Instead, they consume wood they excavate from their nest, and digest it by means of symbiotic cellulolytic gut microorganisms (Cleveland et al., 1934; Bell et al., 2007). Cryptocercus punctulatus exhibits the presocial condition by nesting in family groups with overlapping generations that cooperate in brood care (Seelinger and Seelinger, 1983; Nalepa, 1984). A factor that separates subsocial cryptocercids from eusocial termites is that the former lack sterile castes, while termite workers not only remain in the parental nest, but also forego their own direct fitness to help raise the next generations of siblings (Wilson, 1971). It is not clear why extant cryptocercids have not evolved eusociality, but it is apparent that wood-feeding and colonial nesting preceded termite sociality. Nests under bark provide protection from the external environment, promote inbreeding through restricted movement, and also are costly to construct, all of which may have encouraged persistence of social behavior (Hamilton, 1978; Hansell, 1987). As a result, the nests of their presocial ancestors may have been a preadaptation for social evolution in termites.
15
1.2 Termites in the fossil record
Evidence of insect eusocial evolution is preserved in the fossil record. Termites were the first animals to evolve eusociality, predating ants by roughly 35 million years. However, there are gaps in the fossil history because not all species lived in environments conducive to fossil preservation. Moreover, there are surely specimens yet to be found. Only recently have scientists begun to analyze relationships between fossil species of termites and the 2,958 extant species (Engel et al., 2009). The oldest specimens of eusocial termites come from the Early Cretaceous, between 137-130 mya (MartínezDelclòs and Martinell, 1995; Rasnitsyn, 2008), but termites are believed to have diverged from roaches in the Late Jurassic, ~156-145 mya (Engel et al., 2009). Most fossil termites found are winged reproductives preserved in amber, or as depressions in limestone (reviewed by Engel et al., 2009). One worker was found from the Early Cretaceous (Martínez-Delclòs and Martinell, 1995) and soldiers have been found in Miocene (~23-5 mya) Dominican amber (Krishna and Grimaldi, 2009). These individual termite specimens demonstrate the existence of eusociality by the presence of differentiated castes and winged reproductives, which are absent in presocial roaches. They can also be compared to extant species to gauge what other common characteristics these species share. However, individual specimens cannot provide evidence for how large or complex their colonies were. Only fossil nests can show the dynamics of extinct superorganisms.
Compared to fossil insects, diagnosing structures within the fossil record as termite nests is open to interpretation. Bordy et al. (2004) reported having found an advanced fossil termite nest from the Early Jurassic (~200-175 mya) with evidence of fossil fungus gardens. Despite termite origins possibly dating back to the Jurassic, termite
16 body fossil evidence and estimates of divergence times have calculated mound-building
and fungus cultivation to have evolved much more recently (Genise et al., 2005; Engel et al., 2009). Currently, the oldest confirmed termite structure dates back to the Early Cretaceous, about the same age as the oldest termite body fossils (Francis and Harland, 2006). This find was a permineralized bored chamber within conifer wood. Although only a simple chamber, possibly part of a larger structure, it was identified as a termite excavation by the cylindrical, subhexagonal fecal pellets within the boring. Although cryptocercids also excavate galleries in wood (Nalepa, 1984), only extant termites are known to excrete fecal pellets of this shape (Genise, 1995). Fossil nests similar to those currently constructed by members of Hodotermitidae and Mastotermitidae have been found dating back to the Late Triassic, ~228-200 mya (Hasiotis and Dubiel, 1995). Other, more complex fossil nests have been found in the Chad basin, Africa dating ~7-3 mya. These included not only excavated galleries, but also structures obviously constructed and having a complexity akin to today’s Macrotermitinae, part of the most derived termite family Termitidae (Duringer et al., 2007). The range of ichnofossils, from simple to complex, has proven to be a useful interpretive tool for tracking social evolution through the fossil record (reviewed by Hasiotis, 2003).
1.3 Nest types, classifications, and associated levels of sociality
Abe (1984) identified six nesting trends based on different nest systems, and the feeding habits of the nest inhabitants: a) Drywood termites, which nest in and consume only the dry, hard wood in which they live (mainly the Kalotermitidae); b) Dampwood termites, which feed exclusively on the wet, decaying wood in which they live (the
17
Archotermopsidae, and some Rhinotermitidae); c) Intermediate termites, which nest in
wood and construct galleries in the soil or on the ground, and consume other wood sources in addition to the nest itself (Mastotermitidae, some Kalotermitidae, most Rhinotermitidae, and some Termitidae); d) Arboreal termites, which nest on living tree trunks and construct covered galleries leading to food sources completely separate from the nest (many Termitidae); e) Subterranean termites, which make epigeous and /or subterranean nests, also constructing galleries to food sources separate from the nest (Hodotermitidae, some Rhinotermitidae, Serritermitidae, and many Termitidae); and f) humus feeding termites, which make epigeous or subterranean nests and construct galleries to access humus food sources (many Termitidae). These trends were dubbed life types, and can be further grouped into three main categories of nests: one-piece, intermediate, and separate types of nests (Abe, 1987).
Similar to their cryptocercid ancestors, termites from the basal Archotermopsidae live in and consume the same piece of decaying wood, excavating galleries that result in a relatively simple nest architecture (Abe, 1987). These more primitive termites, also part of the lower termites, are distinguished by having flagellated gut protozoa for cellulose digestion (Krishna, 1969), and having “functional” workers that are not completely sterile. Instead these pseudergates (also known as false workers) have a highly flexible development, and retain the ability to achieve reproductive status when the primary queen and king die (Thorne, 1997). In the higher termites of the Termitidae, a true worker caste is present. These workers have lower postembryonic developmental flexibility, no external sexual characteristics present, and in most species have no reproductive potential (Noirot, 1969). The nests in this family vary considerably in size, shape, materials used,
18 as well as methods of construction. For the termite species used in this research, and their