DOCSLIB.ORG

Page 1 C O V I D 1 9 a N D P R a C T I C E C H a N G E I N T H E E V E R Y D a Y L

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Page 1 C O V I D 1 9 a N D P R a C T I C E C H a N G E I N T H E E V E R Y D a Y L S U S T A I N A B L E C O N S U M P T I O N I N S T I T U T E C o v i d 1 9 a n d P r a c t i c e C h a n g e i n t h e E v e r y d a y L i f e D o m a i n s o f H y g i e n e , E a t i n g , M o b i l i t y , S h o p p i n g , L e i s u r e a n d W o r k . I m p l i c a t i o n s f o r E n v i r o n m e n t a l a n d S o c i a l S u s t a i n a b i l i t y D e c e m b e r 2 0 2 0 U L R I K E E H G A R T N E R F R A N K B O O N S Please cite as: Ehgartner, U., Boons, F. (2020). COVID-19 and Practice Change in the Everyday Life Domains of Hygiene, Eating, Mobility, Shopping, Leisure and Work: Implications for Environmental and Social Sustainability. Manchester: Sustainable Consumption Institute. Lead authors Ulrike Ehgartner, Frank Boons Sustainable Consumption Institute (SCI), University of Manchester Contributors This report was developed by Ulrike Ehgartner and Frank Boons on the basis of a document published earlier this year, which brought together contributions from the following SCI researchers: Frank Boons, Alison Browne, Martin Burgess, Ulrike Ehgartner, Steffen Hirth, Michael Hodson, Helen Holmes, Claire Hoolohan, Sherilyn MacGregor, Andrew McMeekin, Josephine Mylan, Filippo Oncini, Matthew Paterson, Malte Rödl, Maria Sharmina, Alan Warde, Daniel Welch, Harald Wieser, Luke Yates and Chunhua Ye. Acknowledgements The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) has contributed to making this publication possible. The views expressed in the report are those of the authors and do not represent Defra policy. The authors would like to thank SCI-affiliates Catherine Walker and Patrick Gould who provided additional inputs and productive feedback, and Katrina Farrugia for proof reading. In this report, evidence of the current crisis, as it is published by journalists, sector experts, analysts and academics is collated and examined against evidence from peer- reviewed research on social practices. The pandemic-related data drawn upon in this report was collected between March and August 2020. As conditions are constantly changing, not only regarding the spread of the virus and measures taken to prevent/slow down transmission, but also as a consequence of interventions taken and socio-economic effects taking hold across all domains of eveyday life, there is a need for ongoing re-evaluation of new evidence against the data drawn upon in this report. Executive summary The Covid-19 pandemic has led to domain have a ripple effect into other widespread changes in social practices in domains; we also find that in cases, key everyday life domains. These changes practices reinforce each other retain the have attracted public and policy interest as status quo. A discussion of the factors that they can be conceived as one step towards shape the interrelatedness of practices more sustainable provision for human needs provides insight for policymaking. such as food, shelter, leisure, and mobility. A key message of our work is that the This report provides a coherent overview of discussion on how to retain Covid-induced available evidence to support a discussion of changes in social practices needs to proceed leveraging changes in social practices with caution, for a number of reasons: towards a more sustainable society. • The Covid-19 pandemic has led to Based on an initial report (SCI, May 2020), waves of governmental and public which covered the immediate changes as a response: “full lockdown”, easing of result of full lockdown in the UK and many other countries, this report takes into restrictions, and then a partial account the next phase of the evolving lockdown. These waves, and to some impact of Covid-19. We provide insight into extent the uncertainty they generate, make it difficult to assess what changes the immediate (during lockdown) as well as in social practices are likely to be ongoing changes in social practices retained. organised along six everyday life domains: • hygiene, eating, mobility, shopping, leisure Evidence on the sustainability impact of and work. For each domain we include a changed practices is patchy. In terms of qualitative discussion of the sustainability sustainability indicators like greenhouse impacts, and provide notes on evidence gas emissions, air quality, access to used. healthy food, data is lacking to make a systematic comparison. Also, practices A key question not addressed in the first can have positive and negative impacts, report concerns the way in which practices which requires a judgment as to what in these domains are related to one another. impact is prioritised. In the current report we provide a full • Social practices, such as for instance chapter which provides conceptual and eating and working, are closely empirical insight into the way in which interlinked. Efforts to retain change in domains. We find initial evidence for the one practice will have implications for way in which changes in practices in one the practices with which it connects. O V E R V I E W O F C O N T E N T Introduction | 1 A practice perspective on the disruption of social life through the coronavirus pandemic | 2 Hygiene Immediate practice changes | 3 Ongoing practice changes | 4 Conditions for retaining practices | 6 Potential sustainability impact | 8 Notes on evidence | 10 Eating Immediate practice changes | 12 Ongoing practice changes | 13 Conditions for retaining practices | 14 Potential sustainability impact | 17 Notes on evidence | 20 Mobility Immediate practice changes | 21 Ongoing practice changes | 22 Conditions for retaining practices | 23 Potential sustainability impact | 26 Notes on evidence | 28 Shopping Immediate practice changes | 30 Ongoing practice changes | 31 Conditions for retaining practices | 33 Potential sustainability impact | 35 Notes on evidence | 37 Leisure Immediate practice changes | 38 Ongoing practice changes | 39 Conditions for retaining practices | 40 Potential sustainability impact | 41 Notes on evidence | 44 Work Immediate practice changes | 46 Ongoing practice changes | 47 Conditions for retaining practices | 47 Potential sustainability impact | 50 Notes on evidence | 52 Covid-19 and practice change across domains How practices connect across domains | 54 Covid-19 and practice change: Instances of ripple effects and strengthening of status quo | 55 Moving forward: What we (do not) know and what we can do | 58 References | 60 1 Introduction The Covid-19 pandemic is deeply affecting technological change, material flows and societies worldwide and demanding a strong ecological dynamics. response across society. Part of this response is reflection and subsequent action that The main section of this report is structured emerges from the key question of how along six different domains of everyday life societies come out of this crisis. in which consumption takes place: Hygiene, Eating, Mobility, Shopping, Leisure and In the UK, the initial national lockdown in Work. Each of these domains will be March has led to a substantial disruption of discussed along the following five questions: the normality of everyday lives, with some remarkably positive sustainability impacts, • Which social practices have including the reduction of air pollution and changed immediately as a GHG emissions, as well as increased social consequence of the Covid-19 cohesion as communities adopt pandemic and the lockdown? collaborative ways of dealing with the • What practice change can we consequences of a prolonged stay inside. observe during the ongoing This prompts immediate reflections on how pandemic? the current coping strategies might feed in to • In relation to the pandemic-related the transition to sustainable societies. practice change observed: What are Helping to understand the challenges and to the conditions for these practices to facilitate this transition is a vital task for be retained? academics. • What are the sustainability implications of practice change and With a focus on the UK, this report seeks to continuation? ground the ongoing public debate on the • What is the evidence base for these pandemic and the impact that responses changes and their sustainability such as lockdown rules and social distancing impact? measures have on our lives. These ongoing debates on the pandemic are placed within Looking at these domains separately makes research insight and evidence from the study sense as the Covid-19 pandemic has caused of social practices: how they become distinct impacts in each of them. At the same established and evolve over time and how, time, these domains are closely interrelated under specific conditions, their change can and the potential for retaining practice lead to system-wide change, specifically a change and concomitant positive change towards more sustainable systems of sustainability impacts requires an provision. Our research draws on the social understanding of these interrelations. These sciences, with a focus on processes of interrelations are taken up in the final section of this report. 2 A practice perspective on the disruption of social life through the coronavirus pandemic The perspective on the consequences of equipment re-directs attention towards Covid-19 taken in this report is directed by a new practices; focus on disruption and change in • people lack the personal resources, established social practices, the routine ways health or finance to return to previous in which people have their meals, do their ways of acting; work, care for their personal hygiene and so • new regulations and new prohibitions on.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Yougov / the Sunday Times Survey Results
    YouGov / The Sunday Times Survey Results Sample Size: 1011 Labour Party Members Fieldwork: 7th - 9th September 2010 1st Preference - September 2010 1st Preference - July 2010 September Choice July Choice Gender Age Diane Andy David Ed Diane Andy David Ed David Ed David Ed Total Ed Balls Ed Balls Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ Abbott Burnham Miliband Miliband Abbott Burnham Miliband Miliband Miliband Miliband Miliband Miliband Weighted Sample 1008 106 86 91 354 287 99 45 65 244 209 431 474 320 340 577 432 331 303 374 Unweighted Sample 1011 102 89 97 344 296 93 45 69 239 221 429 485 310 353 654 357 307 317 387 % %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 1st Preference - September 2010 [Excluding Don't know and Wouldn't Vote] David Miliband 38 0001000824 9 79 16 83 0 68 11 36 42 41 39 35 Ed Miliband 31 00001001114 13 11 69 1 62 11 50 31 31 33 28 33 Diane Abbott 11 1000000702 3144164181112131111 Andy Burnham 10 001000029 66 4 6 7 10 10 10 12 7 8 10 11 Ed Balls 9 0100000852 10 5 6 5 12 7 11 10 8 5 13 10 Weighted Sample 846 92 82 84 320 268 84 41 55 214 186 384 427 279 296 493 353 280 258 308 Unweighted Sample 849 90 85 89 308 277 80 41 58 207 199 380 438 268 309 555 294 260 266 323 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 2nd Preference - September 2010 [Excluding Don't know and Wouldn't Vote] Ed Miliband 30 53 48 34 43 0 42 32 25 33 22 35 27 30 29 29 32 32 33 26 Ed Balls 22 200 2825251936 26 23 21 23 21 24 22 23 21 20 23 23 Andy Burnham 19 14 17 0 21 24 14 18 19 21 18 19 19 19 18 18 20 21 20 16 David Miliband 17 13 20 30 0 35 13 12 24 10 27 13 21 16 20 17 17 15 12 23 Diane Abbott 11 0 15 8 11 16 11 2 7 12 12 9 12 11 11 12 10 12 11 12 Weighted Sample 905 90 74 75 351 285 82 40 56 233 203 431 474 299 319 519 387 303 267 336 Unweighted Sample 914 87 78 84 341 293 79 40 60 228 214 429 485 290 334 592 322 283 280 351 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Miliband preference - September [Excluding definitely wouldn't vote] David Miliband 48 19 28 41 100 1 25 34 37 86 17 100 0 80 17 47 49 48 46 48 Ed Miliband 52 81 72 59 0 99 75 66 63 14 83 0 100 20 83 53 51 52 54 52 1 © 2010 YouGov plc.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Note: Former Special Advisers in Cabinet, 1979-2013
    Research Note: Former Special Advisers in Cabinet, 1979-2013 Executive Summary Sixteen special advisers have gone on to become Cabinet Ministers. This means that of the 492 special advisers listed in the Constitution Unit database in the period 1979-2010, only 3% entered Cabinet. Seven Conservative party Cabinet members were formerly special advisers. o Four Conservative special advisers went on to become Cabinet Ministers in the 1979-1997 period of Conservative governments. o Three former Conservative special advisers currently sit in the Coalition Cabinet: David Cameron, George Osborne and Jonathan Hill. Eight Labour Cabinet members between 1997-2010 were former special advisers. o Five of the eight former special advisers brought into the Labour Cabinet between 1997-2010 had been special advisers to Tony Blair or Gordon Brown. o Jack Straw entered Cabinet in 1997 having been a special adviser before 1979. One Liberal Democrat Cabinet member, Vince Cable, was previously a special adviser to a Labour minister. The Coalition Cabinet of January 2013 currently has four members who were once special advisers. o Also attending Cabinet meetings is another former special adviser: Oliver Letwin as Minister of State for Policy. There are traditionally 21 or 22 Ministers who sit in Cabinet. Unsurprisingly, the number and proportion of Cabinet Ministers who were previously special advisers generally increases the longer governments go on. The number of Cabinet Ministers who were formerly special advisers was greatest at the end of the Labour administration (1997-2010) when seven of the Cabinet Ministers were former special advisers. The proportion of Cabinet made up of former special advisers was greatest in Gordon Brown’s Cabinet when almost one-third (30.5%) of the Cabinet were former special advisers.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (9MB)
    A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details 2018 Behavioural Models for Identifying Authenticity in the Twitter Feeds of UK Members of Parliament A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF UK MPS’ TWEETS BETWEEN 2011 AND 2012; A LONGITUDINAL STUDY MARK MARGARETTEN Mark Stuart Margaretten Submitted for the degree of Doctor of PhilosoPhy at the University of Sussex June 2018 1 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................ 1 DECLARATION .................................................................................................................................. 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 5 FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................... 6 TABLES ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Report
    YouGov /The Sun Survey Results Sample Size: 1102 Labour Voting Labour Party Affiliated Trade Unionists Fieldwork: 27th - 29th July 2010 First Choice Affiliated Trade Yourself on Left-Right Social First Choice Voting Intention VI Excluding Gender Age Unions scale Grade Mililands Very/ Diane Ed Andy David Ed Abbott, Balls & Slightly Centre Under Over Total Unison Unite GMB Fairly M F ABC1 C2DE Abbott Balls Burnham Miliband Miliband Burnham Left and Right 40 40 Left Weighted Sample 1094 148 100 116 301 230 364 357 346 166 455 347 171 654 440 279 815 621 473 Unweighted Sample 1102 150 100 116 309 232 366 481 305 122 467 354 171 703 399 276 826 635 467 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % As you probably know, the Labour Party is holding an election to decide its next leader. Where would you place each of the candidates on this scale?* Diane Abbott Very left-wing 17 12 15 26 20 23 17 16 19 18 22 20 12 21 13 21 16 21 13 Fairly left-wing 32 50 28 42 32 34 41 33 35 31 40 42 16 34 29 22 36 36 27 Slightly left-of-centre 14 20 18 14 14 14 17 14 15 15 17 17 11 16 12 12 15 13 15 Centre 5 5 6 3 5 7 5 5 4 8 5 4 9 5 5 7 5 6 4 Slightly right-of-centre 4 1 7 2 4 4 3 3 3 5 4 2 8 3 4 3 4 4 3 Fairly right-wing 1 1 0 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 0 2 1 1 Very right-wing 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 Don't know 26 12 26 11 24 14 15 27 22 22 12 14 39 19 36 34 23 19 34 Average* -56 -57 -49 -62 -56 -57 -56 -57 -57 -53 -59 -61 -32 -57 -54 -60 -54 -59 -55 * Very left-wing=-100; fairly left-wing=-67; slightly left-of- centre=-33; centre=0; slightly right-of-centre=+33;
    [Show full text]
  • Election 2015- Hume Brophy Daily Update 14 20 April 2015
    Election 2015- Hume Brophy Daily Update 14 20 April 2015 With only 2 weekends to go until the General Election, on the Political shows yesterday, the Prime Minister David Cameron said the idea of the SNP influencing a Labour government was "a frightening prospect". Mr Cameron added that a possible deal between the two would ensure that people from the rest of the UK “wouldn't get a look in.” Whilst, Nicola Sturgeon hinted that the SNP could back a Labour Queen's Speech after the general election. Scotland’s First Minister said if there were more anti- Tory MPs than Conservative MPs in the Commons, the SNP and Labour could work together to “lock David Cameron out of Downing Street”. Ed Balls said the Labour party was not looking to do any deals with the SNP, either formal coalition or confidence and supply deals. He said: “We're not going to start getting involved in coalitions or with a party that wants to break up the United Kingdom." Mr Balls also said David Cameron was getting “desperate” due to the Tory failure to press ahead in the polls. As mentioned previously, all main party manifestos have been published. If you would like to see Hume Brophy’s own manifesto briefings, please contact us at [email protected] or see our website www.humebrophy.com. Business Today Polls Trivia On the campaign trail Business Today Prime Minister David Cameron and Chancellor George Osborne speak in Cheshire on devolution (10:45am) Labour leader Ed Miliband speaks at the Scottish TUC annual congress in Ayr (4:10pm) Scottish First
    [Show full text]
  • The Crisis of the Democratic Left in Europe
    The crisis of the democratic left in Europe Denis MacShane Published by Progress 83Victoria Street, London SW1H 0HW Tel: 020 3008 8180 Fax: 020 3008 8181 Email: [email protected] www.progressonline.org.uk Progress is an organisation of Labour party members which aims to promote a radical and progressive politics for the 21st century. We seek to discuss, develop and advance the means to create a more free, equal and democratic Britain, which plays an active role in Europe and the wider the world. Diverse and inclusive, we work to improve the level and quality of debate both within the Labour party, and between the party and the wider progressive communnity. Honorary President : Rt Hon Alan Milburn MP Chair : StephenTwigg Vice chairs : Rt Hon Andy Burnham MP, Chris Leslie, Rt Hon Ed Miliband MP, Baroness Delyth Morgan, Meg Munn MP Patrons : Rt Hon Douglas Alexander MP, Wendy Alexander MSP, Ian Austin MP, Rt Hon Hazel Blears MP, Rt HonYvette Cooper MP, Rt Hon John Denham MP, Parmjit Dhanda MP, Natascha Engel MP, Lorna Fitzsimons, Rt Hon Peter Hain MP, John Healey MP, Rt Hon Margaret Hodge MP, Rt Hon Beverley Hughes MP, Rt Hon John Hutton MP, Baroness Jones, Glenys Kinnock MEP, Sadiq Kahn MP, Oona King, David Lammy MP, Cllr Richard Leese,Rt Hon Peter Mandelson, Pat McFadden MP, Rt Hon David Miliband MP,Trevor Phillips, Baroness Prosser, Rt Hon James Purnell MP, Jane Roberts, LordTriesman. Kitty Ussher MP, Martin Winter Honorary Treasurer : Baroness Margaret Jay Director : Robert Philpot Deputy Director : Jessica Asato Website and Communications Manager :Tom Brooks Pollock Events and Membership Officer : Mark Harrison Publications and Events Assistant : EdThornton Published by Progress 83 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0HW Tel: 020 3008 8180 Fax: 020 3008 8181 Email: [email protected] www.progressives.org.uk 1 .
    [Show full text]
  • Sixty Seconds on . . . Quarantining
    NEWS BMJ: first published as 10.1136/bmj.m3240 on 14 August 2020. Downloaded from The BMJ Cite this as: BMJ 2020;370:m3240 Sixty seconds on . quarantining http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3240 Abi Rimmer Published: 14 August 2020 Quarantini, the cocktail of the pandemic? Sadly no, we’re talking about new rules which mean that travellers returning from countries including France, Malta, and the Netherlands will be required to quarantine for 14 days from 15 August.1 Zut alors! Yes, quite. While this isn’t so much of a problem for people working from home, it could prove expensive for those who have to go into a workplace, such as healthcare workers, who may lose two weeks’ pay.2 Bonnes vacances . not If you think this sounds unfair then you’re not alone. The mayor of greater Manchester, Andy Burnham, with the mayor of the Liverpool city region, Steve Rotheram, and the Trades Union Congress, has launched a campaign calling for people to be able to claim for any lost wages while in quarantine.3 Does that add up? The #TimeOutToHelpOut campaign says that, like jury service, quarantine is a civic duty and employers should continue to pay employees as normal and claim the salary back from the government.4 You can’t object to that . No, but while we’re discussing the law it’s also worth pointing out that in England it’s an offence to refuse to quarantine without good reason, under the Health Protection Regulations 2020, which came into force on 8 June.5 From La Belle France to Belmarsh? Not quite.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ANDREW MARR SHOW INTERVIEW: ANDY BURNHAM, MP SHADOW HEALTH SECRETARY OCTOBER 19Th 2014
    PLEASE NOTE “THE ANDREW MARR SHOW” MUST BE CREDITED IF ANY PART OF THIS TRANSCRIPT IS USED THE ANDREW MARR SHOW INTERVIEW: ANDY BURNHAM, MP SHADOW HEALTH SECRETARY OCTOBER 19th 2014 ANDREW MARR: Now Labour have been making some big promises on health in the past month - more money, more staff, and now cancer care – but do their promises to re-found the NHS really stack up? Andy Burnham, Labour’s health spokesman, is here. Welcome. ANDY BURNHAM: Thank you, Andrew. ANDREW MARR: Before we get onto whether they stack up or not, let’s just go back to your promise on cancer care. ANDY BURNHAM: Yeah. ANDREW MARR: This is to radically cut the time between diagnosis and results. And, as Steven Pollard was saying in one of the newspapers today, that’s a very difficult promise to make because cancer is a complicated thing. There can be many, many diagnostic tests and 1 it’s very difficult to promise somebody that within a week they’ll know yes or no, isn’t it? ANDY BURNHAM: Well, Andrew, if we want to make progress on cancer in the next decade, early diagnosis has got to be the focus. These plans go back to when I was health secretary. I asked the National Cancer Director you know what could I do to make the biggest difference on cancer, and he came back to me and said, “Early testing and diagnosis.” And we then developed these plans for 1 week tests and we’re coming back to them now because they remain the right thing to do.
    [Show full text]
  • Creativity and the Experts: New Labour, Think Tanks and The
    Schlesinger, P. (2009) Creativity and the experts: New Labour, think tanks, and the policy process. International Journal of Press/Politics, 14 (1). pp. 3-20. ISSN 1940-1612 http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/4895/ Deposited on: 22 January 2009 Enlighten – Research publications by members of the University of Glasgow http://eprints.gla.ac.uk 1 CREATIVITY AND THE EXPERTS: NEW LABOUR, THINK TANKS AND THE POLICY PROCESS PHILIP SCHLESINGER CENTRE FOR CULTURAL POLICY RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW To be published in the International Journal of Press Politics 2009 Introduction This essay examines the role of expertise in the public debate on creative industries policy in the United Kingdom. Think tanks have been prominent in this. However, in the extensive literature on British think tanks, their relations with the fields of media, culture and communications have been completely neglected. This is a strange omission, given the centrality of these fields to public life – and not least, to the polity and economy. As well as addressing questions in public policy analysis, this article also contributes to the sociology of the intellectuals. It is the politico-intellectual field in which think tanks are situated - between universities and the political institutions. In that location, the connections between think tanks and news media (as well as the political system) are key because some key think tank players are also ‘media intellectuals’. The practice of think 2 tankery is above all about the mediation of ideas, and their brokerage in the public domain, with intended policy effects. We may argue, therefore, that think tanks – as producers of reproducible mediated discourse – are themselves part of a wider communications industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Sun Results 110711 Politicians Recognition and Approval
    YouGov / The Sun Survey Results Sample Size: 2571 GB Adults Fieldwork: 10th - 11th July 2011 Voting intention 2010 Vote Gender Age Social grade Region Lib Lib Rest of Midlands / Total Con Lab Con Lab Male Female 18-24 25-39 40-59 60+ ABC1 C2DE London North Scotland Dem Dem South Wales Weighted Sample 2571 692 850 207 771 703 565 1250 1321 311 656 879 725 1465 1106 329 836 550 632 224 Unweighted Sample 2571 682 814 207 764 670 568 1218 1353 209 689 956 717 1679 892 420 818 520 576 237 % %%%%%% % % % % % % % % % % % % % [A random selection of half of respondents were shown images of the following politicians] Who is this person? Image shown of IDS [Split 1 n=1265] William Hague 3 222313 2 3 1 2 3 3 3 2 4 2 0 4 3 David Cameron 0 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 George Osborne 1 100110 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 Michael Gove 0 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Andrew Lansley 0 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Ken Clarke 0 001010 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Liam Fox 0 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Danny Alexander 0 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Chris Huhne 0 100000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Nick Clegg 0 000000 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Vince Cable 1 113122 0 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 3 2 1 1 0 Ed Miliband 0 000000 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Ed Balls 0 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 David Miliband 0 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Douglas Alexander 0 000000 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eric Pickles 0 000000 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Philip Hammond 0 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jeremy Hunt 0 010010 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 Hilary Benn 0 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Andy Burnham 0 010000 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Alan Johnson 0 000000 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Iain Duncan Smith 69 79 72 70 77 73 68 78 60 47 65 71 79 72 64 69 68 69 69 67 Not sure 24 15 21 25 17 21 26 17 31 43 29 22 15 21 30 22 24 26 24 25 1 © 2011 YouGov plc.
    [Show full text]
  • Advisers to Ministers 5 APRIL 2000
    RESEARCH PAPER 00/42 Advisers to Ministers 5 APRIL 2000 This paper looks at how the use of personal advisers to ministers has developed since 1974, reviews recent developments and examines the recommendations of the Neill Committee on Standards in Public Life. It also looks at the development of task forces as a source of advice to ministers since the 1997 election. The relationship between special advisers and the Government Information and Communication Service is examined, as well as the current structure of the Prime Minister’s Office. The Government Powers (Limitations) Bill, a private member’s ballot bill introduced by Iain Duncan Smith, is due to be debated on second reading on Friday 7 April. The Bill has clauses relating to political advisers and task forces, as well as other topics beyond the scope of this paper. The Parliament and Constitution Centre in the Library can provide briefings on those topics not covered in this paper. Oonagh Gay PARLIAMENT AND CONSTITUTION CENTRE HOUSE OF COMMONS LIBRARY Recent Library Research Papers include: 00/27 The Race Relations Amendment Bill [HL] Bill 60 of 1999-2000 08.03.00 00/28 Unemployment by Constituency, February 2000 15.03.00 00/29 Unemployment by Constituency, Revised rates 15.03.00 00/30 The Countryside and Rights of Way Bill – Wildlife and Conservation Bill 78 of 1999-2000 16.03.00 00/31 The Countryside and Rights of Way Bill – Access and Rights of Way Bill 78 of 1999-2000 16.03.00 00/32 Human Rights in the EU: the Charter of Fundamental Rights 20.03.00 00/33 Russia: The Presidential
    [Show full text]
  • ANDY BURNHAM, MP LABOUR LEADERSHIP CANDIDATE MAY 17Th 2015
    PLEASE NOTE “THE ANDREW MARR SHOW” MUST BE CREDITED IF ANY PART OF THIS TRANSCRIPT IS USED THE ANDREW MARR SHOW INTERVIEW: ANDY BURNHAM, MP LABOUR LEADERSHIP CANDIDATE MAY 17th 2015 ANDREW MARR: And UKIP isn’t the only party in some turmoil, as you may have noticed. Labour is taking a long, hard look at itself after its defeat. The contest to succeed Ed Miliband is now getting underway with a new leader to be chosen in September. Among the four candidates currently in the running is Andy Burnham, the Shadow Health Secretary, and he’s here with me now. Welcome to you … ANDY BURNHAM: Thank you. Good morning, Andrew. ANDREW MARR: Are you the continuity candidate? ANDY BURNHAM: No, I’m the change candidate because we’ve got to reach out to those voters who had doubts about us on immigration and on economic competence. If we’re going to rebuild that trust, we need to have an honest assessment of the record of the last Labour government on the economy and I want to do that. You know if we look at our first term in government … 1 ANDREW MARR: (over) Can I pick you up on change … ANDY BURNHAM: Yeah. ANDREW MARR: … because there are two directions that are being advocated at the moment? There’s Peter Mandelson and people like him saying let’s essentially move back to New Labour, and there are people like Len McCluskey saying no, no, no, we have to move further to the left. Which one are you with? ANDY BURNHAM: Well both approaches are wrong.
    [Show full text]