Sternotherus Odoratus (Latreille) Edgren (1960A), Albrecht (1967), Haines (1969), Zug (1971A)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sternotherus Odoratus (Latreille) Edgren (1960A), Albrecht (1967), Haines (1969), Zug (1971A) 287.1 REPTILIA: TESTUDINES: KINOSTERNIDAE STERNOTHERUSODORATUS Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles. of tuberculate scales on the inner surface of each crus and thigh, extensive exposed skin between the interplastral seams, and the REYNOLDS,SAMUELL. ANDSEIDEL, MICHAELE. 1982. Ster• anal vent extended beyond the posterior edge of the carapace. notherus odoratus. • DESCRIPTIONS. General descriptions: Carr (1952), Ernst and Barbour (1972), Conant (1975). Osteology: Williams (1950), Sternotherus odoratus (Latreille) Edgren (1960a), Albrecht (1967), Haines (1969), Zug (1971a). Stinkpot Shell: Adler (1960), Shah (1960), Tinkle (1962). Myology: Poglay• en-Neuwall (1953), Shah (1962), Schumacher (1973). Urogenital Testudo odorata Latreille, in Sonnini and Latreille, 1802:122. system: Risley (1933), Fox (1977). Sexual dimorphism: Risley Type-locality, "les eaux dorm antes de la Caroline"; restrict• (1930). Egg: Thing (1918), Edgren (1949), Ewert (1979). Cranial ed to "vicinity of Charleston [Charleston County], South arteries: McDowell (1961), Albrecht (1967). Penial morphology: Carolina" by Schmidt (1953:87). Type specimen undesignat• Zug (1966). Coelomic epithelium: Risley (1934). Pharynx: Sieben• ed. rock (1899). Choanal structure: Parsons and Stephens (1968). Ear: Testudo glutinata Daudin, 1802:194. Type-locality, "Etats-Unis Baird (1970). Retina: Ernst et a!. (1970). Cloacal bursa: Smith and d' Amerique"; restricted to "vicinity of Lancaster [Lancaster James (1958). Glands: Hebard and Charipper (1955), Cowan County], Pennsylvania" by Schmidt (1953:87). Type speci• (1973), Ehrenfeld and Ehrenfeld (1973), Winokur and Legler men deposited in the Mus. Natur. Hist. Nat. Paris (not ex• (1974), Manton (1979). amined by authors). Emys odorata: Schweigger, 1812:313. • ILLUSTRATIONS.Color or black and white photographs of Emys glutinata: Merrem, 1820:24. adults or hatchlings are in Ernst and Barbour (1972), Conant Terrapene boscii Merrem, 1820:27. Type-locality, "America sep• (1975), and Pritchard (1979). Eggs are illustrated in Gibbons and tentrionali"; restricted to "vicinity of Philadelphia [Phila• Greene (1979). The skull is illustrated in Siebenrock (1907) and delphia County], Pennsylvania" by Schmidt (1953:87). Type Ernst and Barbour (1972). specimen undesignated. • DISTRIBUTION. Sternotherus odoratus ranges from south• Terrapene odorata: Merrem, 1820:27. eastern Canada and southern Wisconsin southward through flor• Cistuda odorata: Say, 1825:206. ida and southwest to central Texas, including eastern Iowa, Mis• Stemotherus odorata: Gray, 1825:211. First use of combination. souri, eastern Kansas and eastern Oklahoma. An old, presumably Sternothaerus odoratus: Bell, 1825:307. valid, record exists for Sauz, Chihuahua, Mexico (Moll and Wil• Clemmys glutinata: Ritgen, 1828:272. liams, 1963), however, the present status of S. odoratus in Mexico Kinostemum odoratum: Bonaparte, 1830:168. In part. needs study. Emys odoratum: Gray, 1831a:13. Kinosternon odoratum: Gray, 1831b:35. • FOSSIL RECORD. Pliocene fossils are from Clarendonian, Didicla odorata: Rafinesque, 1832:64. Trego County, Kansas (Holman, 1975). Pleistocene records are Staurotypus odoratus: Dumeril and Bibron, 1835:358. from: Clear Creek local fauna, Sangamon, Denton County, Texas Kinosternum guttatum LeConte, 1854:185. Type-locality, "Penn- (Holman, 1963); Vero, Wisconsin, Indian River County, Florida sylvania"; restricted to "vicinity of Philadelphia [philadel• (Weigel, 1962). phia County], Pennsylvania" by Schmidt (1953:87), however, Agassiz (1857:425) stated that the type was from "Upper Dar• • PERTINENTLITERATURE. Sternotherus odoratus has an ex• by [Delaware County], Pennsylvania." Holotype: Acad. Nat• tensive literature which could not be comprehensively cited due ur. Sci. Philadelphia 63 (adult male, dry mount, not exam• to space restrictions. General accounts are provided by Carr ined by authors). (1952) and Ernst and Barbour (1972). Other important references Aromochelys odoratum: Gray, 1855:46. are by topic. Ecology: Thomas and Trautman (1937), Tinkle Testudo glutinosa: Agassiz, 1857:425. (1958), Boyer (1965), Mahmoud (1969), Berry (1975). Movements Ozotheca odorata: Agassiz, 1857:425. and orientation: Cagle (1944), Williams (1952), Gibbons (1970a). Ozotheca tristycha Agassiz, 1857:425. Type-localities, "Osage Behavior: Groves (1972), Zug (1972), Graham and Hutchison River, in Missouri, and in Williamson County, in Texas (1979). Foods and feeding: Mahmoud (1968), Berry (1975). Para• ... near San Antonio, ... Medina River, in Texas"; re• sites: Ernst and Ernst (1977, 1979). Algae: Proctor (1958). Repro• stricted to "San Antonio [Bexar County], Texas" by Schmidt duction: Risley (1930, 1933, 1938), Cagle (1937), Lagler (1941), (1953:87). Syntypes: Missouri, Mus. Compo Zool. 1576 (two Edgren (1942, 1956, 1960b), Tinkle (1959, 1961), Mahmoud (1967), adult males); Texas, Mus. Compo Zool. 1574 (one male and Gibbons (1970b), Sanderson (1970), Ewert (1971, 1979), Mahmoud three females); U.S. Nat. Mus. (juveniles) 69, 71-72, San Pedro near San Antonio, Bexar County, collected by Dr. C. B. R. Kennerly; U.S. Nat. Mus. 7890, Medina River, Texas, collected by Dr. C. B. R. Kennerly (all syntypes examined by authors). Aromochelys guttata: Strauch, 1862:39. Aromochelys tristycha: Strauch, 1862:39. Cinosternum odoratum: Boulenger, 1889:37. • CONTENT.Stemotherus odoratus is monotypic. i! -0- • DEFINITION.Adults of both sexes are 89-136 mm in cara• Ii pace length. The olive to black adult carapace is elongate, narrow Ii and rounded in cross section; however, it may be arched with a slight median keel, flattened middorsally or have a pair of lateral keels. The carapace margin is unserrated. There are 23 marginals including the cervical, the 10th and 11th are almost twice as high as the 9th. The yellowish to brown adult plastron has exposed skin along the interplastral seams, and a single inconspicuous hinge between the pectoral and abdominal scutes. There is a single gular scute. The bridge is covered by the axillary, inguinal and lateral extensions of abdominal scutes. The head has two white or yellow stripes on each side, extending posteriorly from •••• ~._ •./ • .J the nostrils above and below the eye to the neck. These stripes may be obscure in older individuals. One or two pairs of barbels are present on the chin. The skin is grayish-olive to black and MAP. Solid circle marks the type locality, open circles other may have a mottled appearance. Males are distinguished by hav• localities. Stars mark Pliocene and Pleistocene fossil records. ing a long thick tail ending in a terminal nail, two small patches Question mark indicates unverified record. 287.2 and Klicka (1972), Iverson (1977), Ewert and Legler (1978), Moll Edgren, Richard A. 1942. A nesting rendezvous of the musk (1979). Hybridization: Folkerts (1967). Taxonomy: Siebenrock turtle. Chicago Natur. 5:63. (1907), Tinkle (1958, 1961), Frair (1972), Zug (1971b). Karyotype: 1949. Variation in the size of eggs of the turtles Chelydra Stock (1972), Killebrew (1975). Musk: Eisner et al. (1977). Mor• s. serpentina (Linne) and Stemotherus odoratus (Latreille). phology: Williams (1950), Zug (1966, 1971a), Dalrymple (1979). Natur. Hist. Misc. (53):1. Hematology: Crenshaw (1962), Frair (1963, 1977), Coin and Jack• 1956. Egg size in the musk turtle, Stemotherus odoratus son (1965), Hutchison and Szarski (1965), Sullivan and Riggs Latreille. Ibid. (152):1-3. (1967), Dessauer (1970), Jackson et al. (1971), Klicka and Mah• 1960a. A seasonal change in bone density in female musk moud (1971), Seidel (1980). Physiology: Root (1949), Edgren and turtles, Sternotherus odoratus (Latreille). Compo Biochem. Edgren (1955), Hutchison et al. (1966), Belkin (1968), Ernst (1968), Physiol. 1(3):213-217. Dunson (1979), Seidel (1980). Tissue chemistry: Klicka and Mah• 1960b. Ovulation time in the musk turtle, Sternotherus moud (1970), Jackson et al. (1974). Geographic variation: Tinkle odoratus. Copeia 1960(1):60--61. (1961). -, and Margery K. Edgren. 1955. Thermo-regulation in the musk turtle, Sternotherus odoratus Latreille. Herpetologica • ETYMOLOGY.The specific name is from the Latin odoratus, 11(3):213-217. "to have an odor," referring to the strong-scented musk produc• Ehrenfeld, Joan G., and David W. Ehrenfeld. 1973. Externally ing glands. secreting glands of freshwater and sea turtles. Copeia 1973(2):305-314. LITERATURECITED Eisner, Thomas, W. E. Conner, K. Hicks, K. R. Dodge, H. I. Adler, Kraig K. 1960. Notes on lateral expansion of the pe· Rosenberg, T. H. Jones, M. Cohen, and J. Meinwald. 1977. riphery in juveniles of Sternotherus odoratus. Copeia Stink of stinkpot turtle identified: phenylalkanoic acids. Sci• 1960(2):156. ence 196(4296):1347-1349. Agassiz, Louis. 1857. Contributions to the natural history of Ernst, Carl H. 1968. Evaporative water-loss relationships of the United States of America. Vol. 1-2. Little, Brown and turtles. J. Herpetol. 2(3-4):159-161. Co., Boston. 643 p. -, and Roger W. Barbour. 1972. Turtles of the United States. Albrecht, Phillip W. 1967. The cranial arteries and cranial Univ. Press Kentucky, Lexington. x + 347 p. arterial foramina of the turtle genera Chrysemys, Sternothe• -, and Evelyn M. Ernst. 1979. Synopsis of protozoans para• rus, and Trionyx: a comparative study with analysis of pos• sitic in native turtles of the United States. Bull. Maryland sible evolutionary implications. Tulane Stud. Zool. 14(3):81• Herpetol. Soc. 15(1):1-15. 99. -, Soedara Soenarjo, and Helen F. Hamilton. 1970. The ret• Baird,
Recommended publications
  • The Ecology and Evolutionary History of Two Musk Turtles in the Southeastern United States
    The University of Southern Mississippi The Aquila Digital Community Dissertations Spring 2020 The Ecology and Evolutionary History of Two Musk Turtles in the Southeastern United States Grover Brown Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations Part of the Genetics Commons Recommended Citation Brown, Grover, "The Ecology and Evolutionary History of Two Musk Turtles in the Southeastern United States" (2020). Dissertations. 1762. https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations/1762 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF TWO MUSK TURTLES IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES by Grover James Brown III A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School, the College of Arts and Sciences and the School of Biological, Environmental, and Earth Sciences at The University of Southern Mississippi in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Approved by: Brian R. Kreiser, Committee Co-Chair Carl P. Qualls, Committee Co-Chair Jacob F. Schaefer Micheal A. Davis Willian W. Selman II ____________________ ____________________ ____________________ Dr. Brian R. Kreiser Dr. Jacob Schaefer Dr. Karen S. Coats Committee Chair Director of School Dean of the Graduate School May 2020 COPYRIGHT BY Grover James Brown III 2020 Published by the Graduate School ABSTRACT Turtles are among one of the most imperiled vertebrate groups on the planet with more than half of all species worldwide listed as threatened, endangered or extinct by the International Union of the Conservation of Nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Diets of Freshwater Turtles Often Reflect the Availability of Food Resources in the Environment
    Herpetological Conservation and Biology 8(3):561−570. HerpetologicalSubmitted: 26 March Conservation 2013; Accepted: and Biology 21 October 2013; Published: 31 December 2013. RazoR-Backed Musk TuRTle (SternotheruS carinatuS) dieT acRoss a GRadienT of invasion carla l. atkinSon1,2, 3 1Oklahoma Biological Survey, 111 E. Chesapeake St., Norman, OK 73019 2Department of Biology and Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Graduate Program, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Ok 73019 3Present Address: Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Corson Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 e-mail: [email protected] abstract.—diets of freshwater turtles often reflect the availability of food resources in the environment. accordingly, bottom- feeding turtles’ diets are typically composed of benthic macroinvertebrate fauna (e.g., insects and mollusks). However, the composition of benthic systems has changed because many freshwater ecosystems have been invaded by non-native species, including bivalve species such as the asian clam, corbicula fluminea. i studied the diet of Sternotherus carinatus, the Razor- backed Musk Turtle, in southeastern oklahoma across three zones of corbicula abundances: no corbicula, moderate corbicula densities, and high corbicula densities. i hypothesized that the composition of corbicula in the diet would increase with increased abundance of corbicula in the riverine environment. Turtles were caught by snorkel surveys in the little and Mountain fork rivers and kept overnight for the collection of fecal samples. The diet was similar to that found in previous studies on S. carinatus except that corbicula is a new component of the diet and composed the majority of the diet in high-density corbicula areas. an index of Relative importance (iRi) showed that corbicula was the most important prey item in the areas with high corbicula density, was equally as important as gastropods in the areas with moderate corbicula density, and was absent from the diet in areas without corbicula.
    [Show full text]
  • In AR, FL, GA, IA, KY, LA, MO, OH, OK, SC, TN, and TX): Species in Red = Depleted to the Point They May Warrant Federal Endangered Species Act Listing
    Southern and Midwestern Turtle Species Affected by Commercial Harvest (in AR, FL, GA, IA, KY, LA, MO, OH, OK, SC, TN, and TX): species in red = depleted to the point they may warrant federal Endangered Species Act listing Common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina) – AR, GA, IA, KY, MO, OH, OK, SC, TX Florida common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina osceola) - FL Southern painted turtle (Chrysemys dorsalis) – AR Western painted turtle (Chrysemys picta) – IA, MO, OH, OK Spotted turtle (Clemmys gutatta) - FL, GA, OH Florida chicken turtle (Deirochelys reticularia chrysea) – FL Western chicken turtle (Deirochelys reticularia miaria) – AR, FL, GA, KY, MO, OK, TN, TX Barbour’s map turtle (Graptemys barbouri) - FL, GA Cagle’s map turtle (Graptemys caglei) - TX Escambia map turtle (Graptemys ernsti) – FL Common map turtle (Graptemys geographica) – AR, GA, OH, OK Ouachita map turtle (Graptemys ouachitensis) – AR, GA, OH, OK, TX Sabine map turtle (Graptemys ouachitensis sabinensis) – TX False map turtle (Graptemys pseudogeographica) – MO, OK, TX Mississippi map turtle (Graptemys pseuogeographica kohnii) – AR, TX Alabama map turtle (Graptemys pulchra) – GA Texas map turtle (Graptemys versa) - TX Striped mud turtle (Kinosternon baurii) – FL, GA, SC Yellow mud turtle (Kinosternon flavescens) – OK, TX Common mud turtle (Kinosternon subrubrum) – AR, FL, GA, OK, TX Alligator snapping turtle (Macrochelys temminckii) – AR, FL, GA, LA, MO, TX Diamond-back terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin) – FL, GA, LA, SC, TX River cooter (Pseudemys concinna) – AR, FL,
    [Show full text]
  • The Staurotypus Turtles and Aves Share the Same Origin of Sex Chromosomes but Evolved Different Types of Heterogametic Sex Determination
    The Staurotypus Turtles and Aves Share the Same Origin of Sex Chromosomes but Evolved Different Types of Heterogametic Sex Determination Taiki Kawagoshi1, Yoshinobu Uno1, Chizuko Nishida2, Yoichi Matsuda1,3* 1 Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Department of Applied Molecular Biosciences, Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan, 2 Department of Natural History Sciences, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan, 3 Avian Bioscience Research Center, Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan Abstract Reptiles have a wide diversity of sex-determining mechanisms and types of sex chromosomes. Turtles exhibit temperature- dependent sex determination and genotypic sex determination, with male heterogametic (XX/XY) and female heterogametic (ZZ/ZW) sex chromosomes. Identification of sex chromosomes in many turtle species and their comparative genomic analysis are of great significance to understand the evolutionary processes of sex determination and sex chromosome differentiation in Testudines. The Mexican giant musk turtle (Staurotypus triporcatus, Kinosternidae, Testudines) and the giant musk turtle (Staurotypus salvinii) have heteromorphic XY sex chromosomes with a low degree of morphological differentiation; however, their origin and linkage group are still unknown. Cross-species chromosome painting with chromosome-specific DNA from Chinese soft-shelled turtle (Pelodiscus sinensis) revealed that the X and Y chromosomes of S. triporcatus have homology with P. sinensis chromosome 6, which corresponds to the chicken Z chromosome. We cloned cDNA fragments of S. triporcatus homologs of 16 chicken Z-linked genes and mapped them to S. triporcatus and S. salvinii chromosomes using fluorescence in situ hybridization. Sixteen genes were localized to the X and Y long arms in the same order in both species.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacred Turtles in Mayan Art and Iconography
    Sacred Animals and Exotic Tropical Plants by Dr. Nicholas M. Hellmuth Sacred turtles in Mayan art and iconography new FLAAR Report* now lists all picted in Mayan art as one of the housings of the animals that were sacred or of God N (also called Pauahtun). Normally Aotherwise considered as special by God N is in a conch shell or snail shell, but the Classic Maya. !ere are animals that are sometimes he can be in a turtle carapace. related to the sky (constellations, stars, plan- Turtles are found in the various Mayan ets), the forests and those that are associated codices and in the murals of Bonampak. with rivers, lakes, swamps and the oceans. Any good book on Mayan archaeoastrono- !ese waters are conflated by the cosmology my will discuss the turtles (and peccary) in of the Preclassic and Classic Maya into the the murals and codices. Turtles are decora- underwaterworld. tion for a typical Puuc structure at Uxmal On the surface of this underwaterworld you in the Yucatán. Turtle symbolism is deeply get the major interaction of exotic creatures. embedded in Classic Maya beliefs. Crocodiles, fish, sharks, turtles—both sea tur- Dr. Nicholas M. Hellmuth is director of FLAAR tles and freshwater turtles—are often depicted. Reports (Foundation for Latin American Anthro- It has long been recognized that turtle pological Research). To view the list of sacred ani- mals visit www.maya-archaeology.org or contact carapaces were used as musical instruments. Dr. Hellmuth at frontdesk@flaar.org !ese instruments are pictured in murals * See the complete list of sacred animals at and on pottery vases, especially in the Late www.maya-archaeology.org Classic period (AD 600-800).
    [Show full text]
  • Common Musk Turtle
    Common Musk Turtle Common Musk Turtle [Stinkpot] - Pl. 1 (Sternotherus odoratus) Identification: 2" - 5 3/8". The Common Musk Turtle has an olive-brown to black carapace, sometimes marked with dark spots or streaks. The carapace is smooth and domed, and may have green algae growing on its surface. The plastron is yellow to brown. Two key identifying features on the relatively small plastron are: (1) a single hinge, and (2) squarish pectoral scutes (just in front of the hinge). Other key features are two light stripes on the head (these may be hidden by dark pigment), and barbels (small fleshy projections) on the chin and throat. Where to find them: The Common Musk Turtle can be found in still or slow-moving bodies of water, where it prefers to walk slowly along the bottom. It basks just at or below the surface, but can also be seen basking on fallen trees and branches overhanging the water. When to find them: Active April through October. Range: Entire state. Note: In New Jersey, the turtle most similar to this is the Eastern Mud Turtle, which lacks the stripes and the barbels, and has two hinges instead of one. Common Musk Turtle (Sternotherus odoratus) - text pg. 10 Key Features - Carapace: smooth & domed. - Plastron: small with single hinge. - Barbels on chin, two light stripes on head. New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife ~ 2003 Excerpt from: Schwartz, V. & D. Golden, “Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians of New Jersey”. New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife 2002. Order the complete guide at - http://www.state.nj.us/dep/fgw/products.htm.
    [Show full text]
  • New Distributional Records of Freshwater Turtles
    HTTPS://JOURNALS.KU.EDU/REPTILESANDAMPHIBIANSTABLE OF CONTENTS IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANSREPTILES • VOL &15, AMPHIBIANS NO 4 • DEC 2008 • 28(1):146–151189 • APR 2021 IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS CONSERVATION AND NATURAL HISTORY TABLE OF CONTENTS NewFEATURE Distributional ARTICLES Records of Freshwater . Chasing Bullsnakes (Pituophis catenifer sayi) in Wisconsin: TurtlesOn the Roadfrom to Understanding West-central the Ecology and Conservation of the Midwest’s GiantVeracruz, Serpent ...................... Joshua M. KapferMexico 190 . The Shared History of Treeboas (Corallus grenadensis) and Humans on Grenada: A Hypothetical Excursion ............................................................................................................................Robert W. Henderson 198 Víctor Vásquez-Cruz1, Erasmo Cazares-Hernández2, Arleth Reynoso-Martínez1, Alfonso Kelly-Hernández1, RESEARCH ARTICLESAxel Fuentes-Moreno3, and Felipe A. Lara-Hernández1 . 1PIMVS HerpetarioThe Texas Palancoatl,Horned Lizard Avenida in Central 19 andnúmero Western 5525, Texas Colonia ....................... Nueva Emily Esperanza, Henry, JasonCórdoba, Brewer, Veracruz, Krista Mougey, Mexico and ([email protected] Perry 204 ) 2Instituto Tecnológico. The KnightSuperior Anole de Zongolica.(Anolis equestris Colección) in Florida Científica ITSZ. Km 4, Carretera a la Compañía S/N, Tepetitlanapa, Zongolica, Veracruz. México 3Colegio de Postgraduados, ............................................. Campus Montecillo.Brian J. Carretera Camposano, México-Texcoco Kenneth
    [Show full text]
  • Species Assessment for Eastern Musk Turtle
    Species Status Assessment Class: Reptilia Family: Kinosternidae Scientific Name: Sternotherus odoratus Common Name: Eastern musk turtle (stinkpot) Species synopsis: Also known as the stinkpot, the eastern musk turtle emits a distinctive musky odor when threatened. It is highly aquatic, leaving the water infrequently, and moving awkwardly on land when it must. Occupied habitats include lakes, ponds, and rivers that have a muddy bottom substrate and little or no current. The musk turtle has a large distribution that extends across most of the eastern United States and into southern Canada, with a noticeable gap around higher elevation areas. New York is near the northern edge of the range. Musk turtles are common and apparently secure across the range with the exception of populations on the northern edge in Ontario and Quebec. Threats include shoreline development and the removal of submerged aquatic vegetation for recreational activities. I. Status a. Current and Legal Protected Status i. Federal ____Not Listed_______________________ Candidate? ___No_____ ii. New York ____SGCN_________________________________________________________ b. Natural Heritage Program Rank i. Global ____G5____________________________________________________________ ii. New York ____S5_____________________ Tracked by NYNHP? ___No____ Other Rank: IUCN – Least Concern COSEWIC – Special Concern Species of Low Priority (NEPARC 2010) 1 Status Discussion: Van Dijk (2011) refers to common musk turtle as a “very widespread, common, and adaptable species” that is “in no way threatened” despite some marginal populations of local conservation interest, including occurrences in Ontario and Quebec. Musk turtles are listed as Threatened in Canada where declines have been attributed to wetland destruction and shoreline alteration. It is also protected in Canada under the federal Species at Risk Act and is listed as a Specially Protected Reptile under the Ontario Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Preclassic Landscapes and Aquatic Resource Use at Cuello, Belize
    Bull. Fla. Mus. Nat. Hist. (2003)44(1): 35-42 35 MIDDLE PRECLASSIC LANDSCAPES AND AQUATIC RESOURCE USE AT CUELLO, BELIZE Arlene Fradkinl and H. Sorayya Carf The aquatic animals identified among the vertebrate faunal remains recovered in the 1990-1993 excavations at the Maya site of Cuello, Belize, are examined. The detected patterns of aquatic resource use are comparable to those described by Elizabeth Wing and Sylvia Scudder in their faunal analysis from previous excavations. These zooarchaeological findings, combined with paleoecological data, suggest that the people of Cuello focused their aquatic resource procurement efforts primarily on local wetland habitats, which may have formed part of a managed landscape surrounding their community in the Middle Preclassic period. Key words: aquatic resources,.Belize, Cuello, Maya, Middle Preclassic, zooarchaeology The archaeological site of Cuello in northern Belize (Fig. the small mud turtle (Kinosternon spp.) throughout the 1) has yielded abundant information on many aspects of Middle Preclassic (p. 85). ancient Maya life. Extensive excavations conducted over When Hammond et al. (1995) reopened excavations the past three decades, under the direction of Norman atCuello in 1990-1993, they focused primarily on Middle Hammond, have revealed a long occupational record, Preclassic contexts, thus expanding the faunal database. spanning the earliest Middle Preclassic through the Early When we were given the opportunity to study this new Classic (ca. 1200 B.C.-A.D. 400). Cuello is especially material, one of our primary objectives was to examine important for having a substantial amount of material the aquatic animal remains in light of the previous findings. cultural remains dating to the Middle Preclassic, a time We were particularly interested in determining the period poorly represented at most Maya sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Genus: Sternotherus (Musk Turtles) - Darrell Senneke Copyright © 2003 World Chelonian Trust
    Genus: Sternotherus (Musk Turtles) - Darrell Senneke Copyright © 2003 World Chelonian Trust. All rights reserved Sternotherus carinatus - Razor-backed Musk Turtle Sternotherus depressus - Flattened Musk Turtle Sternotherus minor - Loggerhead Musk Turtle Sternotherus minor peltifer - Stripe-neck Musk Turtle Sternotherus odoratus - Common Musk Turtle This care sheet is intended only to cover the general care of these species. Further research to best develop a maintenance plan for whichever species you are caring for is essential.. Many taxonomists often combine genus Sternotherus with Kinosternon as sub- genera of the Family Kinosternidae. While these animals share many of the same habitats, features and care requirements, for the purpose of this care sheet they will be treated as a full Genus. Musk turtles can be found from the Canadian Southern border to Florida and West to the Rocky Mountains. These species are more carnivorous than most turtles with a natural diet that relies heavily on fish, snails, crustaceans and insects. While the Razor-back Musk turtle can attain a size of 15 cm. (6 inches), the much more commonly seen Stinkpot only attains 8 - 10 cm (3 - 4 inches) maximum. Present knowledge and technology make Musk turtles easily maintained animals as long as a person is willing to provide some basic requirements. Thanks to the success that breeders are having with these species it is now possible to purchase many of these species as hatchlings from captive born stock. Some of the species are threatened or endangered in nature, do not remove these animals from the wild. HOUSING MUSK TURTLES INDOORS - The most useful form of indoor accommodation for Sternotherus consists of an aquarium.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinosternon Subrubrum (Bonnaterre 1789) – Eastern Mud Turtle
    Conservation Biology of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises: A Compilation ProjectKinosternidae of the IUCN SSC — KinosternonTortoise and Freshwater subrubrum Turtle Specialist Group 101.1 A.G.J. Rhodin, J.B. Iverson, P.P. van Dijk, K.A. Buhlmann, P.C.H. Pritchard, and R.A. Mittermeier, Eds. Chelonian Research Monographs (ISSN 1088-7105) No. 5, doi:10.3854/crm.5.101.subrubrum.v1.2017 © 2017 by Chelonian Research Foundation and Turtle Conservancy • Published 17 September 2017 Kinosternon subrubrum (Bonnaterre 1789) – Eastern Mud Turtle WALTER E. MESHAKA, JR.1, J. WHITFIELD GIBBONS2, DANIEL F. HUGHES3, MICHAEL W. KLEMENS4, AND JOHN B. IVERSON5 1State Museum of Pennsylvania, 300 North Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 USA [[email protected]]; 2Savannah River Ecology Lab, Drawer E, Aiken, South Carolina 29802 USA [[email protected]]; 3University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas 79968 USA [[email protected]]; 4Department of Herpetology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, New York 10024 USA [[email protected]]; 5Department of Biology, Earlham College, Richmond, Indiana 47374 USA [[email protected]] SUMMARY. — The Eastern Mud Turtle, Kinosternon subrubrum (Family Kinosternidae), is a small (carapace length 85 to 120 mm) polytypic species of the eastern and central United States. All three historically recognized subspecies (K. s. subrubrum, K. s. steindachneri, and K. s. hippocrepis) are semi-aquatic turtles that inhabit much of the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plains. The Florida taxon (K. s. steindachneri) appears to represent a distinct species, but we continue to treat it as a subspecies for the purposes of this account.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy and Phylogeny of the Higher Categories of Cryptodiran Turtles Based on a Cladistic Analysis of Chromosomal Data
    Copein, 1983(4), pp. 918-932 Taxonomy and Phylogeny of the Higher Categories of Cryptodiran Turtles Based on a Cladistic Analysis of Chromosomal Data John W. Bickham and John L. Carr Karyological data are available for 55% of all cryptodiran turtle species including members of all but one family. Cladistic analysis of these data, as well as con sideration of other taxonomic studies, lead us to propose a formal classification and phylogeny not greatly different from that suggested by other workers. We recognize 11 families and three superfamilies. The platysternid and staurotypid turtles are recognized at the familial level. Patterns and models of karyotypic evolution in turtles are reviewed and discussed. OVER the past 10 years knowledge of turtle and the relationship between the shell and pel karyology has grown to such an extent vic girdle. In the cryptodires ("hidden-necked" that the order Testudines is one of the better turtles), the neck is withdrawn into the body in known groups of lower vertebrates (Bickham, a vertical plane and the pelvis is not fused to 1983). Nondifferentially stained karyotypes are either the plastron or carapace, whereas in the known for 55% of cryptodiran turtle species pleurodires ("side-necked" turtles) the pelvic and banded karyotypes for approximately 25% girdle is fused to both the plastron and carapace (Bickham, 1981). From this body of knowledge, and the neck is folded back against the body in as well as a consideration of the morphological a horizontal plane. Cope's suborder Athecae variation in the order, we herein present a gen includes only the Dermochelyidae and is no eral review of the cryptodiran karyological lit longer recognized.
    [Show full text]