The Ecology and Evolutionary History of Two Musk Turtles in the Southeastern United States
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The University of Southern Mississippi The Aquila Digital Community Dissertations Spring 2020 The Ecology and Evolutionary History of Two Musk Turtles in the Southeastern United States Grover Brown Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations Part of the Genetics Commons Recommended Citation Brown, Grover, "The Ecology and Evolutionary History of Two Musk Turtles in the Southeastern United States" (2020). Dissertations. 1762. https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations/1762 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF TWO MUSK TURTLES IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES by Grover James Brown III A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School, the College of Arts and Sciences and the School of Biological, Environmental, and Earth Sciences at The University of Southern Mississippi in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Approved by: Brian R. Kreiser, Committee Co-Chair Carl P. Qualls, Committee Co-Chair Jacob F. Schaefer Micheal A. Davis Willian W. Selman II ____________________ ____________________ ____________________ Dr. Brian R. Kreiser Dr. Jacob Schaefer Dr. Karen S. Coats Committee Chair Director of School Dean of the Graduate School May 2020 COPYRIGHT BY Grover James Brown III 2020 Published by the Graduate School ABSTRACT Turtles are among one of the most imperiled vertebrate groups on the planet with more than half of all species worldwide listed as threatened, endangered or extinct by the International Union of the Conservation of Nature. The Southeastern United States is a global biodiversity hotspot for turtles, and it likely represents the last area on the planet of both high diversity and high abundance of turtle species. In the past century, there has been an exponential increase in the number of publications on turtles in the United States and Canada, however a recent review of the literature suggests that this research attention has not been spread evenly across taxa. The mud turtles (genus Kinosternon) and musk turtles (genus Sternotherus) of the family Kinosternidae remain one of the least studied turtle families. The lotic Sternotherus species have received very little research attention, particularly the stripe-necked musk turtle (Sternotherus peltifer) and the razorback musk turtle (Sternotherus carinatus) with the latter considered one of the top-ten least studied turtle species in the United States and Canada. No studies have examined the population genetics of these highly aquatic species across their geographic ranges, and this is particularly concerning as some states have had to issue moratoriums on commercial harvest of these species to prevent population declines. Harvested turtles are generally destined for overseas markets, as Southeast Asia has decimated its own turtle populations and must look to other areas of high diversity and abundance of turtles to satiate demand. Considering that very little is still known about these species, it is important to have baseline data on the population genetics of these species, as well as fill in knowledge gaps on their ecology to help make more informed conservation and management decisions. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my advisors, Brian Kreiser and Carl Qualls, for their insightful academic guidance throughout my graduate career, particularly for allowing me free reign to develop and pursue this research on these species. They have been pivotal to my development as a biologist. I would also like to thank Dr. Jen Lamb for other statistical, logistical and emotional support throughout my tenure at the University of Southern Mississippi. Dr. Will Selman for valuable insights not just into Mississippi turtle biology, but for valuable career advice along this journey. This research would not have been possible without grants, funding and other support provided by (in alphabetical order): the American Museum of Natural History, the American Turtle Observatory, the Birmingham Audubon Society, the Chicago Herpetological Society, the National Science Foundation, the Turtle Survival Alliance, and the University of Southern Mississippi. iii DEDICATION I would like to partially dedicate this dissertation to the host of people who have inspired me to pursue a career in herpetology. I would first like to thank my family, but in particular my aunt Margaret Rose White, and my grandfather James Bryan White Jr., for introducing me to turtles at a young age and sparking a lifelong passion. I would like to thank Owen Kinney for taking me under his wing in high school and showing me what a career in herpetology looks like. I thank Dr. John Maerz for his mentoring in herpetology during my undergraduate career, and I also want to acknowledge Drs. Kurt Buhlmann and Whit Gibbons for showing me what a lifetime of passion for herpetology can accomplish. I would be remiss not to mention the wonderful friends who have helped me, inspired me and taught me so much: Gabbie Berry, Cyndi Carter, Lucas Haralson, Cybil Huntzinger, Jen Lamb, Luke Pearson, Chris Pellecchia, Todd Pierson, Theresa Stratmann. But mostly, I would like to dedicate this dissertation to my parents, Grover James (Jimmy) Brown Jr. and Carolyn W. Brown, who fostered and supported my interest in wildlife, particularly turtles, from a young age, and who invested so heavily in my education to make sure I had every tool necessary to follow my passion and pursue my dreams. They exemplify selflessness. They are my personal heroes, and no words or document will ever be enough to express my gratitude. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................ ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................. iii DEDICATION ................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ vii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS ............................................................................................. ix CHAPTER I - INTRODUCTION TO TURTLES OF THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Literature Cited ....................................................................................................... 11 CHAPTER II - CHARACTERIZATION OF MICROSATELLITE LOCI FOR THE RAZORBACK MUSK TURTLE (STERNOTHERUS CARINATUS; GRAY 1856) AND THEIR CROSS-AMPLIFICATION IN FIVE OTHER SPECIES IN THE FAMILY KINOSTERNIDAE .......................................................................................................... 19 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 19 2.2 Methods................................................................................................................... 21 2.3 Results ..................................................................................................................... 23 2.4 Discussion ............................................................................................................... 23 2.5 Literature Cited ....................................................................................................... 26 CHAPTER III - RANGE-WIDE POPULATION GENETICS OF THE RAZORBACK MUSK TURTLE (STERNOTHERUS CARINATUS) ....................................................... 35 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 35 3.2 Methods................................................................................................................... 39 3.2.1 Field Collections .............................................................................................. 39 3.2.2 Molecular Methods .......................................................................................... 40 3.3 Results ..................................................................................................................... 43 3.4 Discussion ............................................................................................................... 46 3.5 Literature Cited ....................................................................................................... 63 CHAPTER IV – INTERACTIONS OF THE STRIPE-NECKED MUSK TURTLE AND RAZORBACK MUSK TURTLE IN SYMPATRY AND SYNTOPY IN THE PASCAGOULA RIVER SYSTEM .................................................................................. 71 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 72 4.2 Method .................................................................................................................... 76 4.2.1 Site Selection ................................................................................................... 76 4.2.2 Trapping ..........................................................................................................