DOCSLIB.ORG

RCN NE Terrapin Conservation Strategy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RCN NE Terrapin Conservation Strategy The Northern Diamondback Terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin terrapin) in the Northeast United States: A Regional Conservation Strategy Prepared by: Stephanie Egger, Wildlife Biologist Conserve Wildlife Foundation of New Jersey, Inc. with Contributions from the Diamondback Terrapin Working Group Prepared for: Northeast Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies Northeast Regional Conservation Needs Grant Program 2016 Made possible by State Wildlife Grants and funded by the Northeast Regional Conservation Needs Grant Program. REGIONAL CONSERVATION NEEDS GRANT PROGRAM The Northern Diamondback Terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin terrapin) in the Northeastern United States: A Regional Conservation Strategy was supported by State Wildlife Grant funding awarded through the Northeast Regional Conservation Needs (RCN) Grant Program (RCN Grant 2013-02). The RCN Grant Program joins thirteen northeast States, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in a partnership to address landscape-scale, regional wildlife conservation issues. Progress on these regional issues is achieved through combining resources, leveraging funds, and prioritizing conservation actions identified in the State Wildlife Action Plans (SWAPs). See http://RCNGrants.org. COVER IMAGE: Female Northern diamondback terrapin © Brian Tang i STATE AGENCY PROJECT LEADS AND/OR CONTRIBUTORS New Hampshire (for technical support) Michael Marchand, New Hampshire Fish and Game Department, Concord, New Hampshire Massachusetts Dr. Jonathan Regosin, Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, Westborough, Massachusetts Rhode Island Chris Raithel, Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management, West Kingston, Rhode Island Connecticut Jenny Dickson, Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, Burlington, Connecticut Brian Hess, Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, Burlington, Connecticut New York Kelly Hamilton, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Stony Brook, New York Michelle Gibbons, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Stony Brook, New York John Ozard, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, New York New Jersey Jeanette Bowers Altman, New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife, Trenton, New Jersey Michael Davenport, New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife/Conserve Wildlife Foundation of NJ, Trenton, New Jersey Delaware Holly Niederriter, Delaware Division of Fish and Wildlife, Smyrna, Delaware Robert Meadows, Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Delaware Maryland Scott Smith, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis, Maryland Virginia Ruth Boettcher, Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, Machipongo, Virginia J.D. Kleopfer, Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, Charles City, Virginia Rebecca K. Gwynn, Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, Richmond, Virginia ii CONTRIBUTORS AND COLLABORATORS *Indicates Major Contributor Massachusetts Dr. Barbara Brennessel, Wheaton College, Norton, Massachusetts Don Lewis and Sue Wieber Nourse, Cape Cod Consultants, Marion, Massachusetts Bob Prescott, Massachusetts Audubon, Lincoln, Massachusetts Mark Faherty, Massachusetts Audubon, Lincoln, Massachusetts Nina Coleman, Sandy Neck, Centerville, Massachusetts Robert Cook, Cape Cod National Seashore, Wellfleet, Massachusetts Rhode Island Charlotte Sornborger, Barrington Land Conservation Trust, Barrington, Rhode Island Dr. Malia Schwartz, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island Dr. Nancy Karraker, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island Sarah Helmbrecht, Rhode Island Connecticut Dennis Quinn, CTHerp Consultant, LLC, Connecticut Alisha Mullett, SoundWaters, Stamford, Connecticut Leigh Shemitzm, SoundWaters, Stamford, Connecticut New York Dr. Russell Burke, Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York Laura Francoeur, Port Authority of NY and NJ, John F. Kennedy International Airport, Jamaica, New York Michael Farina, Marine Nature Study Area, Oceanside, New York Dr. Noga Neeman, Via/Hofstra University, New York City, New York Dr. Matt Draud, formerly of Long Island University (CW Post), Brookville, New York Nancy Grant, Friends of Flax Pond, Stony Brook, New York Karen Testa, Turtle Rescue of the Hamptons, Inc., Jamesport, New York New Jersey Dr. John Wnek, Marine Academy of Technology and Environmental Science, Manahawkin, New Jersey Brett Bragin, NJ Sports & Exposition Authority, Lyndhurst, New Jersey Dr. Lisa Ferguson, The Wetlands Institute, Stone Harbor, New Jersey Brian Williamson, The Wetlands Institute, Stone Harbor, New Jersey William Doughty, Margate Terrapin Rescue Project, Margate, New Jersey Kimberly Lull, Margate Terrapin Rescue Project, Margate, New Jersey Michael Davenport, Conserve Wildlife Foundation of NJ/ NJ Division of Fish and Wildlife, Robbinsville, New Jersey Dr. Brooke Maslo, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey Karen Leu, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey Dr. Richard Bastian Monmouth University, West Long Branch, New Jersey Statistician students - Samantha Giordano, Amanda Sutton, Rebecca Lloyd, Taylor Bernosky, Austin Alcott, and Megan O’Donnell, Monmouth University, West Long Branch, New Jersey Ben Wurst, Conserve Wildlife Foundation of NJ, Woodbine, New Jersey Kathy Lacey, Terrapin Nesting Project, High Bar Harbor, New Jersey Sarah Moss, Terrapin Nesting Project, High Bar Harbor, New Jersey (with St. Joseph’s University, Philadelphia, PA) Delaware E.J. Chalabala, Delaware Center for the Inland Bays, Rehoboth Beach, Delaware iii Maryland Paula Henry, USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Beltsville, Maryland Willem Roosenburg, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio (Maryland terrapin Work) Marguerite Whilden, The Terrapin Institute, Neavitt, Maryland Jeff Popp, The Terrapin Institute, Neavitt, Maryland Virginia Dr. Randy Chambers, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia Timothy Russell, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia Dr. Donna Bilkovic, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Gloucester Pt., Virginia Kory Angstadt, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Gloucester Pt., Virginia Diane Tulipani, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Gloucester Pt., Virginia Robert Isdell, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Gloucester Pt., Virginia Dr. Matthew Stone, Kutztown University, Kutztown PA (Virginia terrapin work) Karen Terwilliger, Terwilliger Consulting Inc., Locustville, Virginia Julie Victoria, Terwilliger Consulting Inc., Locustville, Virginia Dr. Elizabeth Crisfield, Terwilliger Consulting Inc., Locustville, Virginia iv TECHNICAL REVIEW Technical review of all or part of this draft was graciously provided by: Dr. Barbara Brennessel, Wheaton College, Norton, Massachusetts Dr. Malia Schwartz, University of RI, Kingston, Rhode Island Jenny Dickson, CT Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, Burlington, Connecticut Dr. Russell Burke, Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York Jeanette Bowers-Altman, NJ Division of Fish and Wildlife, Trenton, New Jersey Dr. John Wnek, Marine Academy of Technology and Environmental Science, Manahawkin, New Jersey Dr. Lisa Ferguson, The Wetlands Institute, Stone Harbor, New Jersey Brian Williamson, The Wetlands Institute, Stone Harbor, New Jersey Holly Niederriter, DE Division of Fish and Wildlife, Smyrna, Delaware Ruth Boettcher, Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, Machipongo, Virginia v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We cannot overstate the value of the generous contributions and support of many individuals who serve as members and terrapin experts of the Diamondback Terrapin Working Group (DTWG) and provided occurrence data and expert opinion to this Conservation Strategy. Over 65 biologists and partners from all levels of government, non-governmental organizations, and academic institutions, as well as unaffiliated individuals have provided important information and support reflected in this Conservation Strategy. We recognize the collective on-going efforts to conserve terrapins in the Northeast (NE) and throughout the species range. Forty partners and over 65 total datasets from the NE region graciously provided databases of terrapin occurrences that were essential to the building of the occurrence GIS layer (see Appendix A). We are forever grateful for the organization of the occurrence data by Michael Davenport (Conserve Wildlife Foundation of New Jersey, Inc., [CWFNJ]/NJ Division of Fish and Wildlife) who built the GIS layer used to identify current terrapin occurrence, data gaps, as well as for use in further analysis. This GIS layer was essential to the probability of occurrence model conducted by Karen Leu and Dr. Brooke Maslo (Rutgers University) that will serve as an important conservation tool that can be used by all researchers and partners to analyze threats throughout the entire NE. We’d like to thank the researchers and partners of the NE Region who provided mark/recapture data for the population modeling including Mark Faherty of Massachusetts Audubon (records from many partners from Massachusetts [MA], 1980 to current), Charlotte Sornborger (Barrington Land Conservation Trust, Rhode Island), Dr. Russell Burke (Hofstra University, New York [NY]), Michael Farina (Marine Nature Study Area, [NY]), Dr. John Wnek (Marine Academy of Technology and Environmental Science, New Jersey [NJ]), and Brett Bragin (NJ Sports & Exposition Authority, NJ). We are especially grateful for the expertise of Dr. Noga Neeman (Via/Hofstra University, NY) who performed the modeling work and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Ecology and Evolutionary History of Two Musk Turtles in the Southeastern United States
    The University of Southern Mississippi The Aquila Digital Community Dissertations Spring 2020 The Ecology and Evolutionary History of Two Musk Turtles in the Southeastern United States Grover Brown Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations Part of the Genetics Commons Recommended Citation Brown, Grover, "The Ecology and Evolutionary History of Two Musk Turtles in the Southeastern United States" (2020). Dissertations. 1762. https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations/1762 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF TWO MUSK TURTLES IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES by Grover James Brown III A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School, the College of Arts and Sciences and the School of Biological, Environmental, and Earth Sciences at The University of Southern Mississippi in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Approved by: Brian R. Kreiser, Committee Co-Chair Carl P. Qualls, Committee Co-Chair Jacob F. Schaefer Micheal A. Davis Willian W. Selman II ____________________ ____________________ ____________________ Dr. Brian R. Kreiser Dr. Jacob Schaefer Dr. Karen S. Coats Committee Chair Director of School Dean of the Graduate School May 2020 COPYRIGHT BY Grover James Brown III 2020 Published by the Graduate School ABSTRACT Turtles are among one of the most imperiled vertebrate groups on the planet with more than half of all species worldwide listed as threatened, endangered or extinct by the International Union of the Conservation of Nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Saving the Diamondback Terrapin
    Disney Worldwide Conservation Fund Allows Teachers to Broaden Awareness of the Plight of the Diamondback Terrapin Maggie Dugan: Upper Township Elementary School Jane Krajewski: Quinton Township School Mary Lyons and Lynn Tyskas: Millville Public Schools Our Mission • Gain greater insight into the Terrapin Conservation Project through direct participation with scientists/interns at the Wetlands Institute • Create lessons and activities that can be used throughout the state (and beyond ) to help enlighten others about the terrapin crisis • Provide instruction about the diamondback terrapin at upcoming conferences and disseminate our units to help enhance core standard teaching by incorporating terrapin education within objectives that are already in place in the classroom SAVING THE DIAMONDBACK TERRAPIN Jane Krajewski Quinton Township Elementary School ISN’T SHE CUTE? Diamondback terrapins are the only turtles that live in brackish (a mix of salt and fresh) water. Terrapin Fast Facts! • Females are usually bigger than males. Do you know why? •Females are larger because they are responsible for carrying the eggs. •They also have smaller tails that don’t get in the way when laying the eggs. • Females leave the water to nest above the high tide line. • They lay about 8-12 eggs. • Females will dig a nest with their back leg. • This plaster mold shows the size and shape of a nest. Egg chamber WHY IS THE FEMALE TERRAPIN MORE ENDANGERED? • Most turtles that cross the road are females. • Females enter the roadway because they are looking for suitable nesting sites. Because males do not have to do this, they are usually not the ones to get hit by cars.
    [Show full text]
  • ( Malaclemys Terrapin Littoralis) at South Deer Island in Galveston Bay
    DistrictCover.fm Page 1 Thursday, May 20, 2004 2:19 PM In cooperation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Occurrence of the Diamondback Terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin littoralis) at South Deer Island in Galveston Bay, Texas, April 2001–May 2002 Open-File Report 03–022 TEXAS Galveston Bay GULF OF EXICO M U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Drawing of Diamondback terrapin by L.S. Coplin, U.S. Geological Survey. U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Occurrence of the Diamondback Terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin littoralis) at South Deer Island in Galveston Bay, Texas, April 2001–May 2002 By Jennifer L. Hogan U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 03–022 In cooperation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Austin, Texas 2003 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information write to District Chief U.S. Geological Survey 8027 Exchange Dr. Austin, TX 78754–4733 E-mail: [email protected] Copies of this report can be purchased from U.S. Geological Survey Information Services Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225–0286 E-mail: [email protected] ii CONTENTS Abstract ................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction .........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Diamondback Terrapin Malaclemys Terrapin Contributors: Dubose Griffin, David Owens and J
    Diamondback Terrapin Malaclemys terrapin Contributors: DuBose Griffin, David Owens and J. Whitfield Gibbons DESCRIPTION Taxonomy and Basic Description The diamondback terrapin is a small, long-lived estuarine turtle endemic to coastal marshes, estuarine bays, lagoons and creeks ranging from Cape Cod, Massachusetts to the Gulf Coast of Texas. Currently, there are five (Hartsell 2001) or seven (Ernst et al. 1994) subspecies. More recently, Hart (2004) identified six management units. The subspecies found in South Carolina is Malaclemys terrapin centrata. Terrapins have varied coloration from black to spotted patterns on the soft tissue and dark or light-colored scutes with strong concentric layers on the carapace. The hind margin of the carapace curls up instead of flaring. Hind legs are large and toes have extensive webs. These turtles are strong, fast swimmers that feed on a variety of mollusks, crustaceans and other invertebrates. In South Carolina, salt marsh periwinkles (Littoraria irrorata) and blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus) are among the terrapin’s primary food sources (Tucker et al. 1995; Levesque 2000). Terrapins are sexually dimorphic. Females are much larger than males and reach 15 to 18 cm (6 to7 inches) in length; males reach 10 to 13 cm (4 to 5 inches) in length. Adult females also have enlarged heads. Terrapins hibernate in the mud during winter and mate in the spring. Eggs are laid May through early August and clutches have 5 to 12 eggs (Pritchard 1979). The number of clutches laid per female in South Carolina is undocumented; however two clutches may be common (David Owens, College of Charleston, pers.
    [Show full text]
  • Pinelands Commission Approves SJ Gas Pipeline
    April / May 2017 Volume 24 Number 3 Brendan T. Byrne Fund for the Pinelands Reaches $ 4 Million Goal .............. 3 Join us for a Pinelands Adventure in 2017 .... 4 Katie Smith Joins PPA’s staff ................ 6 Residents protest the South Jersey Gas Pipeline during the Pinelands Commission vote on February 24th. Pinelands Events ...... 7 Pinelands Commission Approves SJ Gas Pipeline by Katie Smith, Policy Advocate On February 24, the Pinelands creative signs, including one depicting the Open House Commission voted 9-5-1, over massive Lorax from Dr. Seuss’s The Lorax with the protest, to approve the South Jersey Gas caption “I speak for the Pines.” The public May 21st pipeline that will cross the Forest Area of filled over half of the ballroom, capacity 12 noon to 4 pm the Pinelands- if it is ever built. The 1500 people, reserved for the event. Celebrate the successful Pinelands Preservation Alliance has one pending appeal against the informal When the chair began to make a motion completion of the to take action on the pipeline application, Brendan T. Byrne Fund process the Commission used in its approval, and we filed an appeal on the the crowd began chanting “NO!” After for the Pinelands. Tour several minutes, some Commissioners the newly renovated merits of the February 24th decision. With the support of leaders like former expressed their concerns with the applica- barn, enjoy music, light governors Brendan Byrne, Tom Kean, Jim tion. Voicing concern for the process of refreshments and more! Florio and Christine Todd Whitman, and the public comment period, factual inac- of many thousands of citizens, PPA aims curacies in the application, and limited Location: time to review documents received by the PPA Offices to prevent the pipeline from being built Commissioners the night before the vote, 17 Pemberton Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • In AR, FL, GA, IA, KY, LA, MO, OH, OK, SC, TN, and TX): Species in Red = Depleted to the Point They May Warrant Federal Endangered Species Act Listing
    Southern and Midwestern Turtle Species Affected by Commercial Harvest (in AR, FL, GA, IA, KY, LA, MO, OH, OK, SC, TN, and TX): species in red = depleted to the point they may warrant federal Endangered Species Act listing Common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina) – AR, GA, IA, KY, MO, OH, OK, SC, TX Florida common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina osceola) - FL Southern painted turtle (Chrysemys dorsalis) – AR Western painted turtle (Chrysemys picta) – IA, MO, OH, OK Spotted turtle (Clemmys gutatta) - FL, GA, OH Florida chicken turtle (Deirochelys reticularia chrysea) – FL Western chicken turtle (Deirochelys reticularia miaria) – AR, FL, GA, KY, MO, OK, TN, TX Barbour’s map turtle (Graptemys barbouri) - FL, GA Cagle’s map turtle (Graptemys caglei) - TX Escambia map turtle (Graptemys ernsti) – FL Common map turtle (Graptemys geographica) – AR, GA, OH, OK Ouachita map turtle (Graptemys ouachitensis) – AR, GA, OH, OK, TX Sabine map turtle (Graptemys ouachitensis sabinensis) – TX False map turtle (Graptemys pseudogeographica) – MO, OK, TX Mississippi map turtle (Graptemys pseuogeographica kohnii) – AR, TX Alabama map turtle (Graptemys pulchra) – GA Texas map turtle (Graptemys versa) - TX Striped mud turtle (Kinosternon baurii) – FL, GA, SC Yellow mud turtle (Kinosternon flavescens) – OK, TX Common mud turtle (Kinosternon subrubrum) – AR, FL, GA, OK, TX Alligator snapping turtle (Macrochelys temminckii) – AR, FL, GA, LA, MO, TX Diamond-back terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin) – FL, GA, LA, SC, TX River cooter (Pseudemys concinna) – AR, FL,
    [Show full text]
  • Malaclemys Terrapin) in South Carolina
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228984250 Demographic and Ecological Factors Affecting Conservation and Management of the Diamondback Terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin) in South Carolina Article in Chelonian Conservation and Biology · January 2001 CITATIONS READS 117 843 5 authors, including: Jeff Lovich Anton D. Tucker United States Geological Survey Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions 149 PUBLICATIONS 3,369 CITATIONS 103 PUBLICATIONS 1,701 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Nancy N FitzSimmons Griffith University 116 PUBLICATIONS 2,693 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Western pond turtles in the Mojave River View project Applied population modeling of imperiled vertebrates View project All content following this page was uploaded by Jeff Lovich on 17 May 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. 66 CHELONIAN CONSERVATION AND BIOLOGY, Volume 4, Number 1 – 2001 Chelonian Conservation and Biology, 2001, 4(1):66–74 © 2001 by Chelonian Research Foundation Demographic and Ecological Factors Affecting Conservation and Management of the Diamondback Terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin) in South Carolina J. WHITFIELD GIBBONS1, JEFFREY E. LOVICH1,2, ANTON D. TUCKER1,3, NANCY N. FITZSIMMONS1,3, AND JUDITH L. GREENE1 1Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, Drawer E, Aiken, South Carolina 29802 USA [Fax: 803-725-3309; E-mail: [email protected]]; 2Present Address: U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, 7801 Folsom Boulevard, Suite 101, Sacramento, California 95826 USA; 3Present Address: Conservation Strategy, Freshwater Turtle Research, Queensland Department of Environment and Heritage, P.O. Box 1735, Bundaberg, Queensland 4670 Australia ABSTRACT.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural History Notes on Nesting, Nests, and Hatchling Emergence in the Red-Eared Slider Turtle, Trachemys Scripta Elegans, in West-Central Illinois John K
    UIMIVtKSli » s, ILLINOIS LIBRARY AT URBAMA CHAMPAIGN NATURAL HIST SURVEY ILLINOIS NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY Natural History Notes on Nesting, Nests, and Hatchling Emergence in the Red-eared Slider Turtle, Trachemys scripta elegans, in West-central Illinois John K. Tucker Biological Notes 140 January 1997 Illinois Natural History Survey, EdwardJ. Armbrust, Acting Chief 607 East Peabody Drive Champaign, Illinois 61820 (217) 333-6880 A Division of the Illinois Department of Natural Resources Printed by authority of the state of Illinois RR80485GR-3M-1-97 US ISSN 0073-490X Editors: Tliomas E, Rice and Charles Warwick Cover photograph by Michael Jeffords Suggested citation; Tucker, J. K. 1997. Natural history notes on nesting, nests, and hatchling emergence in the red-eared slider turtle, Tracbemys scripla elegaiis, in west-central Illinois. Illinois Naairal History Survey Biological Notes 140. 13 pp. Author's address: John K. Tucker, Illinois Natural History- Suney, LTRM Program, Reach 26, 4134 Alby St., Alton, IL 62002 ) INTRODUCTION An important exception is the mild controversy concerning correlation of mean temperatures during various portions of the activity cycle with the onset of nesting. Christens and Detailed studies of terrestrial movements and activities of Bider ( 1986) found a correlation between onset of nesting and aquatic turtles have focused mainly on the energetics or the mean temperatures of the previous year in the painted turtle ecological benefits of such movements (e.g.. Sexton 1959; (Chrysemys picia) from Quebec. In contrast, Obbard and Gibbons 1986; Congdon and Gatten 1989). Such terrestrial Brooks (1987, for the common snapping turtle \Chelydra movements or activities include nesting forays, migration, and serpentina]).
    [Show full text]
  • Public Hearing Before ASSEMBLY ENVIRONMENT and ENERGY COMMITTEE
    Public Hearing before ASSEMBLY ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY COMMITTEE ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 70 (The "Green Acres, Farmland and Historic Preservation, and Blue Acres Bond Act of 1995"; authorizes issuance of $350 million in bonds; appropriates $5000) LOCATION: Ocean County Gov't Complex DATE: March 20, 1995 Freeholders Meeting Room 10:00 a.m. Toms River, New Jersey MEMBERS OF COMMITTEE PRESENT: Asse~jlywornan Maureen Ogden, Chair Assemblyman Steve Corodernus AssemDlyman David W. Wolfe AsserJ:: lyman Torn Foley Asser.1blyrnan John c. Gibson ALSO PRESENT: Jeffrey T. Climpson Aide, Assembly Environment and Energy Committee Off ice of Legislative Services Hearing Recorded and Transcribed by The Office of Legislative Services, Public Information Office, Hearing Unit, State House Annex, CN 068, Trenton, New Jersey 08625 MAUREEN OGDEN Choir LEE SOLOMON ~rfn ~ rrsrv ~fafr llrBislafurr STEVE CORODEMUS JOHN E. ROONEY ASSEMBLY ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY COMMITTEE BARBARA W. WRIGHT LEGISLATIVE OFFICE BUILDING, CN-068 ANTHONY IMPREVEDUTO HARRY A. MCENROE TRENTON, NJ 08625-0068 (609) 292-7676 R E V I S E D P U B L I C H E A R I N G N 0 T I C E TO: MEMBERS OF THE ASSEMBLY ENVIRONMENT & ENERGY COMMITTEE FROM: ASSEMBLYWOMAN MAUREEN OGDEN, CHAIR SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING - March 20, 1995 The public ma.v address comments and questions to Jeffrey T. Climpson or Lucinda TiajolofJ, Committee Aides, or make bill status and scheduling inquiries to Elva Thomas, secretary, at (609) 292-7676. Those persons presenting written testimony should provide 15 copies to the committee on the day of the hearing. The Assembly Environment & Energy Committee will hold a public hearing on Monday, March 20, 1995 at *10:00 AM in the Ocean County Government Complex, Administration Building, Freeholders Meeting Room (Room 119), 101 Hooper Ave., Toms River, NJ, on the following bill: A-70 The ··Green Acres, Farmland and Historic Ogden/Wolfe Preservation, and Blue Acres Bond Act of 1995"; authorizes issuance of 5350 million in bonds: appropriates $5,000.
    [Show full text]
  • The Barnegat Bay Watershed Educational Resource Guide
    Barnegat Bay Watershed Educational Resource Guide Prepared by Christine R. Raabe For the Ocean County Soil Conservation District and the Barnegat Bay Watershed Environmental Educators Roundtable Updated: March 2012 by the Barnegat Bay Partnership Table of Contents Introduction How to Use this Guide 1. Organizations and Agencies Involved with Barnegat Bay Watershed Education 2. National Organizations for Additional Resources 3. A Synopsis of Teacher Resources 4. Other Resource Guides and Directories 5. Map Resources 6. Barnegat Bay Watershed Environmental Educators Roundtable Steering Committee Members i Introduction The Ocean County Soil Conservation District and the Barnegat Bay Watershed Environmental Educators Roundtable discovered that educators within the watershed need assistance in finding pertinent information and resources if they are to effectively teach about the Barnegat Bay watershed and the issues that impact it. This guide has been compiled to answer that need. What began as a simple directory has grown into an annotated compendium of resources and organizations offering numerous programs, publications, field trips, and watershed information which educators can incorporate into their lessons and activities. It is a guide that will prove useful to anyone searching for information about the features and functions of the Barnegat Bay watershed. This Educator’s Resource Guide will be updated periodically. Please help us keep the document current by e-mailing Mary Judge at [email protected] with any additions, deletions, or corrections to the entries in this directory. Thank you for your help with this ongoing project. Original funding for this guide was provided by the USEPA and the NJDEP through the Barnegat Bay Partnership (BBP, formerly Barnegat Bay National Estuary Program) and the Partnership for Nonpoint Source Pollution Control in the Barnegat Bay Watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guide to Coastal Environmental Geology of Rhode Island's Barrier Beach Coastline
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository New England Intercollegiate Geological NEIGC Trips Excursion Collection 1-1-1981 Field Guide to Coastal Environmental Geology of Rhode Island's Barrier Beach Coastline Fisher, John J. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/neigc_trips Recommended Citation Fisher, John J., "Field Guide to Coastal Environmental Geology of Rhode Island's Barrier Beach Coastline" (1981). NEIGC Trips. 297. https://scholars.unh.edu/neigc_trips/297 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the New England Intercollegiate Geological Excursion Collection at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in NEIGC Trips by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 153 Trip B-6 Field Guide to Coastal Environmental Geology of Rhode Island's Barrier Beach Coastline fcy John J. Fisher Department of Geology University of Rhode Island Kingston, RI 02881 Introduction The Rhode Island southern coastline, 30 km in length, can he classified as a barrier beach complex shoreline. Developed from a mainland consisting pri­ marily of a glacial outwash plain, it has been submerged by recent sea level rise. Headlands (locally called "points") composed of till and outwash plain deposits separate a series of lagoon-like hays (locally called "ponds") that are drowned glacial outwash channels. Interconnecting baymouth harriers (locally called "harrier "beaches") with several inlets make up the major shoreform of this coast (Figure l). This field guide is an introduction to the coastal environmental geology features of the Rhode Island harrier beach coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Westerly Harbor Management Plan 2016 Revised 10/28/19
    Town of Westerly Harbor Management Plan 2016 Revised 10/28/19 As Adopted by the Westerly Town Council, October 28, 2019 1 Contents INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 3 WESTERLY HMC MISSION STATEMENT ................................................................... 4 PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................. 5 HISTORY ......................................................................................................................... 18 WATER QUALITY.......................................................................................................... 20 NATURAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................... 30 THE BEACHES................................................................................................................ 36 SHORELINE PUBLIC ACCESS ................................................................................... 41 HARBOR FACILITIES AND BOAT RAMPS ............................................................... 53 MOORING MANAGEMENT.......................................................................................... 60 STORM PREPAREDNESS.............................................................................................. 75 WESTERLY HARBOR MANAGEMENT PLAN-ORDINANCE ................................. 81 2 INTRODUCTION The Westerly Harbor Plan is formulated in order to
    [Show full text]