DOCSLIB.ORG

Landlord's Guide to Right to Rent Checks

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Landlord's Guide to Right to Rent Checks Landlord’s guide to right to rent checks Page 1 of 63 Published on 31 August 2021 Contents About this guidance ................................................................................................ 6 Previous versions of Right to Rent Scheme guidance ............................................ 6 Summary of changes in this issue of the guide ...................................................... 7 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 8 Discrimination ......................................................................................................... 8 References in this guidance ................................................................................... 9 Legislation ............................................................................................................ 11 Who may be liable for a civil penalty? ...................................................................... 13 Liability .................................................................................................................. 13 Transfer of Liability ............................................................................................... 13 Appointing an agent .......................................................................................... 13 Tenants who sub-let and lodgers ...................................................................... 14 Sitting tenants and changes in landlord ............................................................ 14 Who can occupy residential accommodation? ......................................................... 16 Those with an unlimited right to rent ..................................................................... 16 Those with a time-limited right to rent ................................................................... 16 The eligibility period .......................................................................................... 17 Those with no right to rent .................................................................................... 17 Those who have been granted permission to rent by the Home Office ................ 17 Children ................................................................................................................ 18 Letting Arrangements that fall within the Scheme .................................................... 19 Residential tenancy agreements .......................................................................... 19 Property for use as an only or main home ............................................................ 20 Holiday accommodation ....................................................................................... 20 House guests ........................................................................................................ 21 Excluded agreements ........................................................................................... 21 Accommodation involving local authorities ........................................................ 21 Social housing ................................................................................................... 21 Care homes, hospitals and hospices and continuing healthcare provision ....... 22 Hostels and refuges .......................................................................................... 22 Mobile homes .................................................................................................... 22 Tied accommodation ......................................................................................... 22 Student accommodation ................................................................................... 22 Long leases ....................................................................................................... 23 Page 2 of 63 Published on 31 August 2021 The ways in which a landlord can establish a statutory excuse against liability for a civil penalty ............................................................................................................... 24 When to conduct initial right to rent checks .......................................................... 24 Agreeing to a tenancy in principle ......................................................................... 25 Ways to evidence a right to rent ........................................................................... 25 Conducting a manual document-based right to rent check ............................... 25 Step 1: Obtain ................................................................................................ 25 Step 2: Check ................................................................................................ 25 Step 3: Record and retain evidence of the check .......................................... 26 Lists of acceptable documents which can be used for a manual document check ............................................................................................................. 26 Conducting a right to rent check using the Home Office online service ............ 27 How does the service work? .......................................................................... 27 Step 1: Use the Home Office online service............................................... 28 Step 2: Check ............................................................................................ 28 Step 3: Copy and retain evidence of the check .......................................... 30 The Home Office Landlord Checking Service ....................................................... 31 Certificate of Application ................................................................................... 32 Nationals of an EEA country, Australia, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, Singapore, South Korea or the USA who are visitors to the UK.............................................. 33 How to conduct a right to rent check on nationals of the EEA, Australia, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, Singapore, South Korea or the USA who are visitors to the UK ..................................................................................................................... 34 When to conduct a follow-up check ...................................................................... 34 Making a report to the Home Office ...................................................................... 35 When to end a tenancy due to immigration status ................................................... 36 Ending a tenancy: your options ............................................................................ 36 Using a Notice of Letting to a Disqualified Person ................................................ 36 Using a Notice of Letting to a Disqualified Person when it names all the tenants . 37 Using a Notice of Letting to a Disqualified Person when it names some of the tenants .................................................................................................................. 37 Taking other steps to recover possession ......................................................... 38 Tell the Home Office that a disqualified person has left your property .................. 38 Request a Notice of Letting to a Disqualified Person ............................................ 38 ‘Minded to serve’ process ..................................................................................... 39 Check if a person is still disqualified from renting ................................................. 39 Further advice on ending a tenancy .................................................................. 39 What are the sanctions if you are found to be renting to a disqualified person? ...... 40 Page 3 of 63 Published on 31 August 2021 Civil penalties ....................................................................................................... 40 The offence of ‘knowingly letting to a disqualified person’ .................................... 40 How and when a civil penalty is served ................................................................ 41 Paying a civil penalty ............................................................................................ 41 Fast payment option .......................................................................................... 41 Payment by instalments .................................................................................... 41 Objecting to a civil penalty .................................................................................... 42 Appeal against a civil penalty ............................................................................... 43 Annex A: List of acceptable documents for a manual right to rent check ................. 44 Lists of acceptable documents to establish a continuous statutory excuse .......... 44 Annex B .................................................................................................................... 49 Biometric Residence Permits ................................................................................ 49 Windrush generation ............................................................................................. 49 Students ............................................................................................................... 50 First time students from overseas ..................................................................... 50 Returning students from overseas .................................................................... 50
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Schengen Acquis
    The Schengen acquis integrated into the European Union ð 1 May 1999 Notice This booklet, which has been prepared by the General Secretariat of the Council, does not commit either the Community institutions or the governments of the Member States. Please note that only the text that shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities L 239, 22 September 2000, is deemed authentic. For further information, please contact the Information Policy, Transparency and Public Relations Division at the following address: General Secretariat of the Council Rue de la Loi 175 B-1048 Brussels Fax 32 (0)2 285 5332 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://ue.eu.int A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet.It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu.int). Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2001 ISBN 92-824-1776-X European Communities, 2001 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in Belgium 3 FOREWORD When the Amsterdam Treaty entered into force on 1 May 1999, cooperation measures hitherto in the Schengen framework were integrated into the European Union framework. The Schengen Protocol annexed to the Amsterdam Treaty lays down detailed arrangements for that integration process. An annex to the protocolspecifies what is meant by ‘Schengen acquis’. The decisions and declarations adopted within the Schengen institutional framework by the Executive Committee have never before been published. The GeneralSecretariat of the Councilhas decided to produce for those interested a collection of the Executive Committee decisions and declarations integrated by the Councildecision of 20 May 1999 (1999/435/EC).
    [Show full text]
  • Estate Administration: a Course of Seminars
    THE NEW SOUTH WALES BAR ASSOCIATION THE LAW SOCIETY OF NEW SOUTH WALES ESTATE ADMINISTRATION : A COURSE OF SEMINARS – The Protective, Probate and Family Provision Jurisdictions of the Supreme Court of New South Wales SEMINAR NO. 1 : An introductory Overview 26 May 2015 (Revised) by Justice Geoff Lindsay, Justice Phil Hallen, Probate and Protective List Judge, Family Provision List Judge, NSW Supreme Court NSW Supreme Court A PROVINCE OF MODERN EQUITY : MANAMANAGEMENTGEMENT OF LIFE, DEATH AND ESTATE ADMINISTRATION By Lindsay J INTRODUCTION 1. The course of seminars introduced by this paper is intended: (a) to provide an introduction to current principles, practice and procedure governing the protective, probate and family provision jurisdiction(s) of the Supreme Court of NSW; and (b) to encourage discussion of principles attending the administration of estates, before and after death. 2. The seminars are timely, for a variety of reasons: a. the protective, probate and family provision jurisdictions are intrinsically important to the way law is administered, and society functions, in NSW. b. over recent decades there have been fundamental changes to the way the law is administered, and further changes of that order are likely. c. the subject matter of the protective, probate and family provision jurisdictions is not routinely studied at university level, and generations of lawyers have come of age without studying them. 1 d. well-rounded lawyers need something more than passing familiarity with these areas of the law, whatever their preferred areas of practice or academic study. e. in recent years there has been a large expansion in the numbers of people engaging the protective function of government (more through statutory tribunals operating under the supervision of the Court, than through proceedings in the Court) and the family provision jurisdiction of the Court, with the Court’s probate jurisdiction (supplemented by its equity jurisdiction) mediating between them.
    [Show full text]
  • Driving Sustainability in New Homes: a Resource for Local Authorities VERSION 1.1: July 2018
    Driving sustainability in new homes: a resource for local authorities VERSION 1.1: July 2018 (Version 1.0 originally published March 2018) An output from the UKGBC Cities Programme, sponsored by: 1 Acknowledgements This resource is the output of a UKGBC project in association with The intention is that key stakeholders feel ‘co-ownership’ of this Core Cities UK. It has been produced through a combination of resource, and we are grateful to the organisations below for their workshops, meetings, written consultation and individual feedback. endorsement. We invite others to do likewise. A large number of organisations have taken time to feed into the For any queries in relation to this resource, contact process. A full list can be found on the following slide. However, John Alker, Director of Policy & Places, UKGBC: we are particularly grateful for the extensive time provided by [email protected] Charlene Clear, BRE and Duncan Price, BuroHappold. 2 Acknowledgements The following organisations provided input and/or review during the original process. This acknowledgement does not imply endorsement. Barratt Developments GLA Newcastle City Council Berkeley Group Greater Manchester Combined Authority PassivHaus Trust Bioregional Hoare Lea PRP BRE HTA Rockwool BuroHappold Hurstwyn Associates Saint Gobain Cambridge City Council Igloo Regeneration St Albans & District Council Clarion Housing Group JLL Sustainable Homes Climate KIC Lendlease UK100 Core Cities UK Levitt Bernstein Useful Projects Currie Brown Linkcity WSP Eastleigh Borough Council
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Law Journal
    THE AUSTRALIAN LAW JOURNAL VOLUME 86 January 2012 — December 2012 GENERAL EDITOR MR JUSTICE P W YOUNG AO THOMSON REUTERS EDITOR CHERYLE KING ASSISTANT GENERAL EDITOR ANGELINA GOMEZ INDEX ALAN WALKER BA (Hons), DipLib THOMSON REUTERS 2012 Customer Service and Sales Inquiries Tel: 1300 304 195 Fax: 1300 304 196 Web: www.thomsonreuters.com.au/legal/ Email: [email protected] Editorial Inquiries Tel: 61 2 8587 7000 HEAD OFFICE 100 Harris Street Pyrmont NSW 2009 Tel: 61 2 8587 7000 Fax: 61 2 8587 7100 ISSN 0004-9611 Typeset by Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Ltd, Pyrmont, NSW Printed by Ligare Pty Ltd, Riverwood, NSW The Australian Law Journal — Vol 86 iii The mode of citation of this volume of the AUSTRALIAN LAW JOURNAL will be: (2012) 86 ALJ TABLE OF CONTENTS AUSTRALIAN LAW JOURNAL TABLE OF AUTHORS ........................................................................ v TABLE OF CASES .............................................................................. ix AUSTRALIAN LAW JOURNAL, VOL 86, No 1, January 2012 to No 12, December 2012 .................. 1-856 INDEX .................................................................................................. 857 AUSTRALIAN LAW JOURNAL REPORTS CASE REPORTERS ............................................................................ iv TABLE OF CASES REPORTED ........................................................ v CORRIGENDA .................................................................................... viii AUSTRALIAN LAW JOURNAL REPORTS, VOL 86 .....................
    [Show full text]
  • Secure Tenure for Home Ownership and Economic Development on Land Subject to Native Title
    Secure tenure for home ownership and economic development on land subject to native title Ed Wensing and Jonathan Taylor AIATSIS Research DiscussioN Paper NUMBER 31 August 2012 Wensing, E & Taylor, J 2012, Secure tenure options for home ownership and economic development on land subject to native title, AIATSIS research discussion paper no. 31, AIATSIS Research Publications, canberra. Secure tenure for home ownership and economic development on land subject to native title Ed Wensing and Jonathan Taylor AIATSIS Research Discussion Paper No. 31 First published in 2012 by AIATSIS Research Publications © Ed Wensing and Jonathan Taylor, 2012 All rights reserved. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under theCopyright Act 1968 (the Act), no part of this article may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. The Act also allows a maximum of one chapter or 10 per cent of this book, whichever is the greater, to be photocopied or distributed digitally by any educational institution for its educational purposes, provided that the educational institution (or body that administers it) has given a remuneration notice to Copyright Agency Limited (CAL) under the Act. The views expressed in this series are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies. Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS) GPO Box 553, Canberra ACT 2601 Phone: (61 2) 6246 1111 Fax: (61 2) 6261 4285 Email: [email protected] Web: www.aiatsis.gov.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry: Author: Wensing, Ed (Edward George) Title: Secure tenure for home ownership and economic development on land subject to Native Title / Ed Wensing & Jonathan Taylor.
    [Show full text]
  • Empowering Smarter Property and Household Decisions Empowering Smarter Property and Household
    ZPG Plc Annual Report 2017 ZPG Plc Annual Report 2017 Empowering smarter property and household decisions ZPG Plc owns and operates some of the UK’s most trusted digital brands that help empower smarter property and household decisions including Zoopla, uSwitch, Money, PrimeLocation and SmartNewHomes. We are also one of the leading residential property software and data providers with a range of products including Hometrack, TechnicWeb, Ravensworth, Alto, Jupix, ExpertAgent, PropertyFile and MoveIT. Our websites and apps attract over 50 million visits per month and over 25,000 business partners use our services. p20 Focused on delivering transparency and efficiency: Most useful resource for consumers p26 Focused on delivering transparency and efficiency: Best place for our teams Contents “ We have made significant progress Strategic report towards our mission of being the 02 Highlights platform of choice for consumers 04 At a glance and partners engaged in property 06 Chairman’s statement and household decisions.” 08 Chief Executive Officer’s statement and business review Alex Chesterman OBE, 12 M&A and partnership activity Founder & CEO 14 Business model 15 Strategy 16 Stakeholder engagement 18 Our markets 28 Key performance indicators 30 Risk management and key risks 36 Financial review 42 Our people and corporate social responsibility p22 Corporate governance 48 Chairman’s introduction to governance 50 Board of Directors 52 Corporate governance statement Focused on delivering 58 Audit Committee report transparency and efficiency: 64
    [Show full text]
  • Professor the Hon Clyde Croft AM SC Called 1978 Silk 2000
    Professor the Hon Clyde Croft AM SC Called 1978 Silk 2000 As an Independent Arbitrator and Mediator, Professor Croft has over 30 years experience in International and Australian arbitration and mediation as an Arbitrator, Mediator, Barrister, Senior Counsel, Supreme Court Judge and in policy advising in all aspects of international and domestic dispute resolution to governments and public and private organisations in Australia and elsewhere. Professor Croft was appointed “Silk”, as one of the Senior Counsel for the State of Victoria (SC), in 2000. He was, in 2009, appointed a Judge of the Supreme Court of Victoria and for a decade, until his retirement in 2019, was the Judge in Charge of the Arbitration List in the Commercial Court of that Court. Prior to his appointment to the Supreme Court Dr Croft practised extensively in property and commercial law and was an arbitrator and mediator in many property, construction and commercial disputes, domestically and internationally. He was then, and is now on his leaving the Court, Professor in the Monash University Law Faculty An Institute of Arbitrators and Mediators (IAMA) (now the Resolution Institute and a Grade 1 Arbitrator (the highest grading) A member of the IAMA Australian and International Panel of Commercial Arbitrators A member of the Australian Centre for International Commercial Arbitration (ACICA), the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) and the Asia Pacific Regional Arbitration Group (APRAG) panels of international arbitrators. Represented APRAG at the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) International Arbitration Working Group Sessions from 2005 until 2010 A member of the Hague Conference on Private International Law Working Group on Choice of Law in International Contracts.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 August 2020 Purplebricks Group Plc (“Purplebricks”, the “Company” Or the “Group”) Annual Results for the Year Ende
    3 August 2020 Purplebricks Group plc (“Purplebricks”, the “Company” or the “Group”) Annual Results for the year ended 30 April 2020 Resilient FY20 performance and strong trading since housing market reopened Purplebricks Group plc (AIM: PURP), a leading UK estate agency business, announces its results for the year ended 30 April 2020 (“FY 2020”) and provides an update on strategy and current trading. Full Year 2020 2019 Change Group* £m £m Revenue 111.1 113.8 -2% Gross profit 67.7 69.4 -3% Gross profit margin (%) 60.9% 61.0% -10 bps Operating loss (9.4) (1.5) -527% Adjusted EBITDA1 1.8 6.6 -73% Cash at year end2 31.0 62.8 - *Group refers to UK and Canada Financial and operational results • COVID-19 materially impacted trading at year end, business adapted quickly to remain open and conserve cash • UK average revenue per instruction (‘ARPI’)3 of £1,394, up 12% (2019: £1,243) • Revenue - Group revenue down by 2% to £111.1m (2019: £113.8m) - UK revenue flat through first 10 months until pandemic and down 11% for full year - UK instructions down 23% but underpinned by 12% increase in ARPI • Adjusted EBITDA - Group adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations reduced to £1.8m (2019: £6.6m) including loss of £1.4m from Canada which was sold post year end - UK adjusted EBITDA down to £4.8m (2019: £10.2m) reflecting impact of suspension of housing market in the last two months of the financial year • Including the results of the discontinued operations in the US and Australia, the Group’s total loss for the year was £19.2m (2019: £54.9m) • Strong
    [Show full text]
  • European Agreement on Regulations Governing the Movement of Persons Between Member States of the Council of Europe (ETS No. 025)
    European Treaty Series - No. 25 EUROPEAN AGREEMENT ON REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS BETWEEN MEMBER STATES OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE Paris, 13.XII.1957 Migrationsrecht.net www.migrationsrecht.net 2 ETS 25 – Movement of Persons, 13.XII.1957 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ The governments signatory hereto, being members of the Council of Europe, Desirous of facilitating personal travel between their countries, Have agreed as follows: Article 1 1 Nationals of the Contracting Parties, whatever their country of residence, may enter or leave the territory of another Party by all frontiers on presentation of one of the documents listed in the appendix to this Agreement, which is an integral part thereof. 2 The facilities mentioned in paragraph 1 above shall be available only for visits of not more than three months' duration. 3 Valid passports and visas may be required for all visits of more than three months' duration or whenever the territory of another Party is entered for the purpose of pursuing a gainful activity. 4 For the purposes of this Agreement, the term “territory” of a Contracting Party shall have the meaning assigned to it by such a Party in a declaration addressed to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe for communication to all other Contracting Parties. Article 2 Migrationsrecht.net To the extent that one or more Contracting Parties deem necessary, the frontier shall be crossed only at authorised points. Article 3 The foregoing provisions shall in no way prejudice the laws and regulations governing visits by aliens to the territory of any Contracting Party. Article 4 This Agreement shall not prejudice the provisions of any domestic law and bilateral or multilateral treaties, conventions or agreements now in force or which may hereafter enter into force, whereby more favourable terms are applied to the nationals of other Contracting Parties in respect of the crossing of frontiers.
    [Show full text]
  • Decisions of the Executive Committee and the Central Group — Declarations of the Central Group
    2. — DECISIONS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND THE CENTRAL GROUP — DECLARATIONS OF THE CENTRAL GROUP 2.1. HORIZONTAL 2. — DECISIONS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND THE CENTRAL GROUP 155 DECISION OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE of 14 December 1993 concerning the declarations by the ministers and State secretaries (SCH/Com-ex (93) 10) The Executive Committee, Having regard to Article 132 of the convention implementing the Schengen Agreement, HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS: the declarations by the ministers and State secretaries of 19 June 1992 (1) and 30 June 1993 regarding the bringing into force of the implementing convention and the fulfilment of the prerequisites are hereby confirmed. Paris, 14 December 1993 The Chairman A. LAMASSOURE (1) The declarations of 19 June 1992 have not been taken over in the acquis. 156 The Schengen acquis Annex Madrid, 30 June 1993 SCH/M (93) 14 DECLARATION OF THE MINISTERS AND STATE SECRETARIES 1. The ministers and State secretaries hereby agree to set the political goal of applying the 1990 Schengen Convention as of 1 December 1993. 2. The ministers and State secretaries note that the following preconditions have been fulfilled: — the common manual; — the arrangements for issuing the uniform visa and the common consular instructions on visas; — the examination of applications for asylum; — the airports, as agreed in the declaration of the ministers and State secretaries of 19 June 1992. Great progress has been made in respect of the other preconditions, which have already been fulfilled to such an extent that the said application ought to be possible as of 1 December 1993.
    [Show full text]
  • Important Notice
    IMPORTANT NOTICE THIS DOCUMENT IS AVAILABLE ONLY TO INVESTORS WHO ARE (1) QUALIFIED INSTITUTIONAL BUYERS (“QIBS”) AS DEFINED IN RULE 144A UNDER THE US SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “US SECURITIES ACT”), OR (2) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES IN COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATION S UNDER THE US SECURITIES ACT (“REGULATION S”). IMPORTANT: You must read the following before continuing. The following applies to the document following this page (the “ Document ”), and you are therefore advised to read this notice carefully before reading, accessing or making any other use of the Document. In accessing the Document, you agree to be bound by the following terms and conditions, including any modifications to them any time you receive any information from Countryside Properties plc (the “ Company ”), J.P. Morgan Securities plc, which conducts its investment banking activities as J.P. Morgan Cazenove (“ J.P. Morgan Cazenove ”), Barclays Bank PLC (“ Barclays ”), Numis Securities Limited (“ Numis ”) and Peel Hunt LLP (“ Peel Hunt ”) (J.P. Morgan Cazenove, Barclays, Numis and Peel Hunt each a “ Bank ” and collectively, the “ Banks ”) as a result of such access. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OF THIS ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION, PLEASE DO NOT DISTRIBUTE OR COPY THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION, BUT INSTEAD DELETE AND DESTROY ALL COPIES OF THIS ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION. NOTHING IN THIS ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION CONSTITUTES AN OFFER OF SECURITIES FOR SALE IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE IT IS UNLAWFUL TO DO SO. THE SECURITIES DESCRIBED HEREIN HAVE NOT BEEN AND WILL NOT BE REGISTERED UNDER THE US SECURITIES ACT, OR THE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF THE UNITED STATES AND SUCH SECURITIES MAY NOT BE OFFERED, SOLD, PLEDGED OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY IN, INTO OR WITHIN THE UNITED STATES, EXCEPT PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION FROM, OR IN A TRANSACTION NOT SUBJECT TO, THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE US SECURITIES ACT AND APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS.
    [Show full text]
  • Conveyancing 2030 a DISCUSSION PAPER CLC Conveyancing Whitepaper
    Council for Licensed Conveyancers Conveyancing 2030 www.clc-uk.org A DISCUSSION PAPER CLC Conveyancing whitepaper Welcome I am pleased to introduce our Discussion Paper on the future of conveyancing. It is an exciting time to be involved in the property sector as technology rapidly replaces the old ways of operating. We are probably just a few short years away from a fully digital conveyancing system that promises a faster transaction and a better experience for all those involved. Digitalisation will open up a range of opportunities for improving the home buying and selling nexperience for consumers. But it will not come without risk, and this paper explores how the conveyancing market is already changing and could be radically reshaped in the years to come. This change points to questions for the CLC as the specialist regulator and for conveyancers as they seek to develop their businesses. While there are many areas of the law where there is little public pressure for Janet Paraskeva - Chair, reform, that is not the case for property and efforts to speed up the process Council for Licensed Conveyancers are already underway. This report examines the longer-term trends and posits a future where the conveyancing market could look very different from today. We do not expect paper and typewriters to suddenly make a resurgence, nor to see a return to personal completions. Instead we expect smart homes to enable properties to maintain an up-to-date electronic logbook that automatically collates much of the information that conveyancers are currently tasked with gathering. In other words, we could bring into existence a ‘digital twin’ for each property.
    [Show full text]