Second Revision No. 1-NFPA 53-2015 [ Section No

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Second Revision No. 1-NFPA 53-2015 [ Section No National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara... Second Revision No. 1-NFPA 53-2015 [ Section No. F.3.3.8 ] 1 of 16 6/5/2015 2:42 PM National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara... F.3.3.8 2 of 16 6/5/2015 2:42 PM National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara... The oxygen index test, ASTM D2863, and variations of it have come into wide use in the last few years for their characterizations of the flammability of materials. In the ASTM procedure, a small, vertically oriented sample is burned downward in a candle-like fashion in an oxygen-nitrogen mixture. The composition of the gas mixture is adjusted to determine the minimum percent of oxygen that will begin to support combustion of the sample. This minimum oxygen concentration is called the oxygen index (OI). Burning in an upward direction can take place more readily and produce a lower OI. The OI test, as determined by ASTM D2863, is limited to nonmetals (e.g., plastics) at ambient pressure. However, the OI concept is now utilized at elevated pressures (and temperatures) and for metals as well as nonmetals (see F.3.4 for the OI data of metals) . Other means of ignition have also been used, as have other oxidants and diluents. (44, 45) Conceptually, an OI is a flammability limit but is more complex than the flammability limit for gas mixtures. Therefore, the OI is only one of several criteria that can be utilized to evaluate the suitability of materials for a specific oxygen application. Data from three standard test methods, as shown in Table F.3.3.8 , are commonly used to evaluate the suitability of nonmetallic materials for oxygen service. The autogenous ignition temperature (AIT) determined by ASTM G72 (or equivalent) provides an indication of the sensitivity of a material to ignition in high-pressure oxygen. The AIT of a material indicates the temperature at which the material spontaneously ignites under the standard test conditions (~1500 psi). The material with the highest AIT, suitable for the application, is usually preferred. The heat of combustion (H of C) determined by ASTM D4809 (or equivalent) provides an indication of the intrinsic heat content of the material when fully consumed in an oxygen-enriched environment. The H of C of a material provides an indication of the damage potential when a material ignites and burns in an oxygen-enriched environment. The material with the lowest H of C, suitable for the application, is usually preferred. The oxygen index (OI) of a material determined by ASTM G125 or ASTM D2863 (or equivalent) indicates the percentage of oxygen (typically flowing in nitrogen) required for a material to self-sustain combustion after positive ignition at ambient pressure. The OI of a material provides an indication of the minimum percentage of oxygen necessary before the material would be expected to continue burning once ignited in an oxygen-enriched atmosphere. The material with the highest OI, suitable for the application, is usually preferred. Table F.3.3.8 provides some OI oxygen compatibility data for nonmetals at ambient pressure. Table F.3.3.8(a) Oxygen Index for Selected Materials (46) a Material Description OI Polyacetal 16 Loctite pipe sealant ® b Nuclear grade PST Anaerobic sealant (cured), cup test 17 b Type PS/T Anaerobic sealant (cured), cup test 20 Poly(methylmethacrylate) Plexiglas 18.5 ± 0.5 ECO/Rubber Epichlorohydrin rubber 18.5 Silicone rubber RTV 102 23 Silastic@ 732 25 SMS 2454 25 RTV 60 28.5 RTV 560 29 RTV 560 mixture User-added 50% glass 36 b Silicone grease Cup test 26 ± 1 ® Rectorseal #15 thread sealant <30.0 3 of 16 6/5/2015 2:42 PM National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara... a Material Description OI Durabla gasket 28.0 ± 0.5 b Fluorosilicone grease #822 Cup test 30 ® Blue Gard gaskets Blue Gard 3000 Nonasbestos gasket 30.5 ± 0.5 Blue Gard 3200 Nonasbestos gasket 31 Blue Gard 3400 Nonasbestos gasket 52 Blue Gard 3200 Nonasbestos gasket 60 Blue Gard 3000 Nonasbestos gasket 62 Blue Gard 3300 Nonasbestos gasket 68 Nylon Nylon 66 30.5 Nylon 66 (glass-filled) 23.5 CYL-SEAL thread sealant 38 Polyvinylidene fluoride ® Kynar 39 Fluorocarbon rubber ® Viton Brown O-ring 40.5 ± 0.5 Viton, green Green O-ring 42 Viton A 57 Viton A 57.5 Viton E-60C 60.5 ® Viton B , #V494-70 DNP ® Balston filters Type— Epoxy Cut from cylinder 42.5 Type Q-fluorocarbon Cut from cylinder 47 ± 1 Type H-Inorganic Cut from cylinder DNI b ® MOS cup test 45 Molykote Z powder 2 b Bel-Ray greases Cup test 57 b FC1260 Cup test DNP FC1245 Halocarbon oil/graphite ® b Key Abso-Lute Cup test 67 CTFE lubricants b Fluorolube GR362 grease Cup test 67 ± 4 b Halocarbon 25-20 oil Cup test 75 b Halocarbon 11-14S oil Cup test DNP Fluorocarbon FEP Tubing 77 Fluorocarbon PFA 100 Fluorocarbon TFE DNP PFPE grease b Fomblin RT15 Cup test DNP 4 of 16 6/5/2015 2:42 PM National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara... a Material Description OI ® b Krytox 283AC Cup test DNP b Krytox GPL 225 Cup test DNP b Krytox GPL 205 Cup test DNI b Tribolube 13C Cup test DNP PFPE fluid b Fomblin Y25 Cup test DNI b Krytox GPL 105 Cup test DNP CTFE plastic ® Kel-F 81 15% glass-filled DNP Kel-F 81 Nonplasticized DNP Perfluoroelastomer ® Kalrez 1045 O-ring DNP Kalrez 1050 O-ring DNP Kalrez 4079 O-ring DNP b Silica gel Cup test DNI b Blue drierite Cup test DNI Kaowool insulation Alumina-silica DNI Cerawool paper DNI Fiberglass/cement board DNI ® b Kwik Flux #54 Cup test DNI Asbestos cement board ® Transite DNI ® Sindanyo CS51 DNI ® Turnalite TI 150 DNI 2 Asbestos paper 32 lb/100 ft DNI a DNP: Did not propagate. DNI: Did not ignite. b Cup test performed as described by Nelson, G. L., and Webb, J. L. “Oxygen Index of Liquids, Techniques and Application.” Journal of Fire and Flammability , Vol. 4, July 1973, pp. 210–226. Table F.3.3.8 Oxygen Compatibility Data for Selected Materials (33, 46, 64–74) Trade Name or Generic AIT H of C Material Description (°C) (cal/grm) OI (%) Plastics Chlorotrifluoroethylene ACLAR 22 and 23 349–390 See PCTFE 95–100 (PCTFE) ABS Acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene 243 8500 18–39 Delrin, Acetal Poly(acetyl) 178–195 4029 14.2–16.1 Copolymer of ethylene and ® 171 3254–3900 52 Halar chlorotrifluoroethylene Hypalon Sheet 0.60 in. Chlorosulfonated polyethylene 6800 25.1 5 of 16 6/5/2015 2:42 PM National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara... Trade Name or Generic AIT H of C Material Description (°C) (cal/grm) OI (%) Kel-F 81 PCTFE plastic 388 2300 DNP Kynar Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) 268 3277 39–43.7 Lexan Polycarbonate 286 7407 27 Mylar Polyethylene terephthalate 181 2300 22.7 Neoflon, M400H- PCTFE plastic (Daikin Japan) 382 1220 DNP amorphous Neoflon, M400H- PCTFE plastic (Daikin Japan) 377 1230 DNP crystalline Polyphenylene oxide blended with Noryl 348 6615 33.3 polystyrene Nylon Nylon 66, polyamide 178–259 7400–7900 23.5–30.5 PEEK Polyetheretherketone 305–325 7775 35 Plexiglas Poly(methyl methacrylate) 230 6000 17–18.5 Polycarbonate, generic Polycarbonate, generic 300–340 7400–9400 22.5–27.4 Polyester Polyester resin 4300 41.5 Polyethylene (PE) Polyethylene plastic 176 11100 17.5 PPS Polyphenylene sulfide 285 6853 43 PP Polypropylene (PP) 174 11000 17–18 PS Polystyrene, hard plastic 250 9900 17–23 PVC Polyvinyl chloride 239 4300 42–65 PVDC Polyvinylidene chloride 5000 60 Rulon A, E, J, LD Filled TFE fluorocarbon 360–427 1400–2100 DNP Teflon FEP Fluorinated ethylene-propylene 378 2500 77 Teflon PFA Perfluoroalkoxy tetrafluoroethylene 424 1250 100 Teflon TFE Polytetrafluoroethylene 427+ 1700 95–100 ETFE, copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene Tefzel 243 3538 30 and ethylene Ultem Polyetherimide 385 7026 47 Vespel SP21 Polyimide with 15% graphite 328–347 6002–6318 53–65 Zytel Zytel, polyamide 259 7708 36 Lubricants and Sealants PTFE pipe tape (clean) TFE-fluorocarbon tape thread sealant 427+ See TFE 83–100 Bel-Ray FC1245 PCTFE oil/graphite 3709 DNP Bel-Ray FC1260 PCTFE oil/graphite 1117 57 Braycote 667 Perfluoroalkyl polyether grease 427+ Christo-Lube MCG111 Perfluoroalkyl polyether grease 470 1049 DNI CYL-Seal Thread sealant 3294 38 Everlube 6711 Colloidal graphite powder 363 MoS in sodium silicate Everlube 811 (cured) 2 427+ Fluorolube GR362 PCTFE/filler 4994 67 Fluorolube LG160 PCTFE 382 2516 Fluorosilicone grease FS grease 30 #822 Fomblin RT15 Perfluoroalkyl polyether grease 427+ 995 DNP Fomblin Y25 oil Perfluoroalkyl polyether oil 427+ 706 DNI 6 of 16 6/5/2015 2:42 PM National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara... Trade Name or Generic AIT H of C Material Description (°C) (cal/grm) OI (%) Gore-Tex joint sealant 0.25- in. thick white 91 Halocarbon PCTFE oil PCTFE oil (various grades) 385–410 1047–1994 75- DNP Halocarbon PCTFE PCTFE grease (various grades) 427+ 1600–2366 67- DNP grease Kel-F-1, 3, 10 PCTFE oil 374–385 Key Abso-Lute Thread sealant 5155 67 Krytox 240 AB Perfluoroalkyl polyether grease 427+ Krytox 240 AC Perfluoroalkyl polyether grease 427+ 900–1000 DNP Krytox GPL 105 Perfluoroalkyl polyether grease DNP Krytox GPL 205 Perfluoroalkyl polyether grease DNI Krytox GPL 225 Perfluoroalkyl polyether grease DNP Loctite pipe sealant Anaerobic sealant (cured) 170–260 4204–7600 17–20 MoS fluorocarbon spray Molykote
Recommended publications
  • Safety Data Sheet
    Coghlan’s Magnesium Fire Starter #7870 SAFETY DATA SHEET This Safety Data Sheet complies with the Canadian Hazardous Product Regulations, the United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Hazard Communication Standard, 29 CFR 1910 (OSHA HCS), and the European Union Directives. 1. Product and Supplier Identification 1.1 Product: Magnesium Fire Starter 1.2 Other Means of Identification: Coghlan’s #7870 1.3 Product Use: Fire starter 1.4 Restrictions on Use: None known 1.5 Producer: Coghlan’s Ltd., 121 Irene Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba Canada, R3T 4C7 Telephone: +1(204) 284-9550 Facsimile: +1(204) 475-4127 Email: [email protected] Supplier: As above 1.6 Emergencies: +1(877) 264-4526 2. Hazards Identification 2.1 Classification of product or mixture This product is an untested preparation. GHS classification for this preparation is based upon its use as a fire starter by making shavings and small particulate from the metal block. As shipped in mass form, this preparation is not considered to be a hazardous product and is not classifiable under the requirements of GHS. GHS Classification: Flammable Solids, Category 1 2.2 GHS Label Elements, including precautionary statements Pictogram: Signal Word: Danger Page 1 of 11 October 18, 2016 Coghlan’s Magnesium Fire Starter #7870 GHS Hazard Statements: H228: Flammable Solid GHS Precautionary Statements: Prevention: P210: Keep away from heat, hot surfaces, sparks, open flames and other ignition sources. No smoking. P280: Wear protective gloves, eye and face protection Response: P370+P378: In case of fire use water as first choice. Sand, earth, dry chemical, foam or CO2 may be used to extinguish.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide for Oxygen Compatibility Assessments on Oxygen Components and Systems
    NASA/TM-2007-213740 Guide for Oxygen Compatibility Assessments on Oxygen Components and Systems Keisa R. Rosales NASA Test and Evaluation Contract NASA Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center White Sands Test Facility Las Cruces, New Mexico Michael S. Shoffstall NASA Test and Evaluation Contract NASA Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center White Sands Test Facility Las Cruces, New Mexico Joel M. Stoltzfus NASA Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center White Sands Test Facility Las Cruces, New Mexico March 2007 NASA STI Program ... in Profile Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated • CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. Collected to the advancement of aeronautics and space papers from scientific and technical science. The NASA scientific and technical conferences, symposia, seminars, or other information (STI) program plays a key part in meetings sponsored or co-sponsored helping NASA maintain this important role. by NASA. The NASA STI program operates under the • SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, auspices of the Agency Chief Information technical, or historical information from Officer. It collects, organizes, provides for NASA programs, projects, and missions, archiving, and disseminates NASA’s STI. The often concerned with subjects having NASA STI program provides access to the NASA substantial public interest. Aeronautics and Space Database and its public interface, the NASA Technical Report Server, • TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. English- thus providing one of the largest collections of language translations of foreign scientific aeronautical and space science STI in the world. and technical material pertinent to Results are published in both non-NASA channels NASA’s mission. and by NASA in the NASA STI Report Series, which includes the following report types: Specialized services also include creating custom thesauri, building customized databases, • TECHNICAL PUBLICATION.
    [Show full text]
  • Hot Surface Ignition Temperature of Dust Layers with and Without Combustible Additives
    HOT SURFACE IGNITION TEMPERATURE OF DUST LAYERS WITH AND WITHOUT COMBUSTIBLE ADDITIVES by Haejun Park A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Fire Protection Engineering May 2006 APPROVED: Professor Robert G. Zalosh, Advisor Joseph A. Senecal, Kiddie-Fenwal, Inc., Co-advisor Professor Kathy A. Notarianni, Head of Department Abstract An accumulated combustible dust layer on some hot process equipment such as dryers or hot bearings can be ignited and result in fires when the hot surface temperature is sufficiently high. The ASTM E 2021 test procedure is often used to determine the Hot Surface Minimum Ignition Temperature for a half inch deep layer of a particular dust material. This test procedure was used in this thesis to study possible effects of combustible liquid (such as lubricating oil) and powder additives in the dust layer as well as air flow effects. The following combustible dusts were used: paper dust from a printing press, Arabic gum powder, Pittsburgh seam coal, and brass powder. To develop an improved understanding of the heat transfer, and oxygen mass transfer phenomena occurring in the dust layer, additional instrumentation such as a second thermocouple in the dust layer, an oxygen analyzer and gas sampling line, and an air velocity probe were used in at least some tests. Hot Surface Minimum Ignition temperatures were 220oC for Pittsburgh seam coal, 360oC for paper dust, 270℃ for Arabic gum powder, and > 400oC for brass powder. The addition of 5-10 weight percent stearic acid powder resulted in significantly lower ignition temperature of brass powder.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Hazard Analysis Techniques Chapter Contents Performing a Fire Morgan J
    SECTION 3 Chapter 7 Fire Hazard Analysis Techniques Chapter Contents Performing a Fire Morgan J. Hurley Richard W. Bukowski Hazard Analysis Developing Fire Scenarios and Design Fire Scenarios vailable methods to estimate the potential impact of fire can be divided into two categories: Quantification of Design risk-based and hazard-based. Both types of methods estimate the potential consequences of Fire Scenarios A Prediction of Hazards possible events. Risk-based methods also analyze the likelihood of scenarios occurring, whereas hazard-based methods do not. Fire risk analysis is described more fully in Section 3, Chapter 8, “Fire Risk Analysis.” Section 3, Chapter 9, “Closed Form Enclosure Fire Calculations,” provides Key Terms simple fire growth calculation methods. bounding condition, design The goal of a fire hazards analysis (FHA) is to determine the expected outcome of a specific fire curve, design fire set of conditions called a fire scenario. The scenario includes details of the room dimensions, con- scenario, fire hazard tents, and materials of construction; arrangement of rooms in the building; sources of combustion analysis, fire model, fire air; position of doors; numbers, locations, and characteristics of occupants; and any other details scenario, performance- that have an effect on the outcome of interest. This outcome determination can be made by expert based design, t-squared fire judgment, by probabilistic methods using data from past incidents, or by deterministic means such as fire models. “Fire models” include empirical correlations, computer programs, full-scale and reduced-scale models, and other physical models. The trend today is to use models whenever pos- sible, supplemented if necessary by expert judgment.
    [Show full text]
  • Subject Index
    MNL36-EB/Jan. 2007 Subject Index A safety inspection, 99 Chlorofluorocarbon (CFC), 81 Abrasive blast cleaning, 79 transportation, 99–100 Cleaning, 76–86 Access control, 89 weld testing, 114 methods and aids, 77–81 Acid cleaning, 80 Autogenous ignition (autoignition) procedures, 81–84 Aluminum and aluminum alloys, 48 temperature of nonmetals safety, 77 American National Standards Institute data, 28–36t, 37 specific materials, 84 (ANSI), 117 test method, 28, 37, 38f Cleanliness American Petroleum Institute (API), 117 design for, 60–61, 60f B American Society for Testing and Materials inspection and verification, 82–84 Barricades, oxygen propellant test areas, (ASTM), 117 levels, 76, 77–78t 98–99 American Society of Mechanical Engineers maintaining in oxygen systems, 86 Blasts, 122–123 (ASME), 117 maintaining through assembly, 85–87 Breathing applications, 4 Ancillary equipment, in oxygen-enriched Clothing, in oxygen-enriched environment, 5 Building explosions, 121 environment, 5 Codes, regulations, and guidelines, 116–120 Bulk GOX and LOX storage Aqueous and semiaqueous cleaning, Cold flow, seals, 59 nonpropellant use, 90, 91t 80 Combustion tests, 16–46 propellant use, 90–91 ASME B31.3, 66–67, 70, 108, 110, 115 Compatibility assessment, 132 Burrs, 85 ASME Boiler Pressure Vessel Code, 95, 97, Component reassembly and functional 114 C testing, 84 Assembly, clean, 84–86 Cadmium, 48 Composites, 49–50 Association of American Railroads (AAR), Caustic cleaning, 80 Compressed Gas Association (CGA), emergency procedures, 7 Central nervous system
    [Show full text]
  • Inert Lubricants Oils – Greases – Waxes Halocarbon Inert Lubricants
    Inert Lubricants Oils – Greases – Waxes Halocarbon Inert Lubricants Halocarbon oils, greases and waxes are polychlorotrifluoroethylenes (PCTFE), which are chemically inert and nonflammable lubricants with high thermal stability, good lubricity, high dielectric strength and low compressibility. Halocarbon was the first to commercially produce PCTFE-based lubricants over 60 years ago. We offer a wide range of oils, greases and waxes to meet industries' needs. The inertness of our lubricant is required for the safe handling of highly reactive and/or aggressive chemicals like oxygen, chlorine, hydrogen peroxide, sulfur trioxide and nitric acid. This unique chemistry can also provide advantage in many other applications from lab-scale to the production plant. Have Questions? Contact Francisco Torres, Sr. Sales Manager: [email protected] Contents Chemical Composition 3 Thermal Stability 12 Chemical Inertness 3 Material Compatibility 12 Oxidizer Inertness Tests 5 Elastomers and Plastics 12 Oxygen Inertness Tests, Table 1 5 Metals 13 Shock Sensitivity, Table 2 5 Selecting a Halocarbon Oil Grade 14 Physical Properties 6 Industrial Lubricant Oils, Table 3 7 Viscosity Ratings, Table 6 14 Waxes, Table 4 7 Blending to a Custom Viscosity 15 Greases, Table 5 8 Oil Blending Chart, Figure 3 15 Vapor Pressures, Figure 1 9 Viscosity vs. Temperature, Figure 2 10 Quality Assurance 16 Solubilities 6, 11 Toxicity 16 Bulk Modulus 11 Lubricity 11 Export Shipments 17 Thermal Properties 11 Typical Applications 17 Surface Tension 12 Electrical Properties 12 2 Chemical Composition Halocarbon oils are saturated, hydrogen-free low molecular weight polymers of chlorotrifluoroethylene having the formula –(CF2CFCl)n–, where n ranges from 2 to approximately 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Data Sheet
    SAFETY DATA SHEET Creation Date 18-Apr-2011 Revision Date 19-Mar-2018 Revision Number 1 SECTION 1: IDENTIFICATION OF THE SUBSTANCE/MIXTURE AND OF THE COMPANY/UNDERTAKING 1.1. Product identification Product Description: Misch metal Cat No. : 45589 Synonyms Misch metal cerium CAS-No 62379-61-7 Molecular Formula Ce Reach Registration Number - 1.2. Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against Recommended Use Laboratory chemicals. Uses advised against No Information available 1.3. Details of the supplier of the safety data sheet Company Alfa Aesar . Avocado Research Chemicals, Ltd. Shore Road Port of Heysham Industrial Park Heysham, Lancashire LA3 2XY United Kingdom Office Tel: +44 (0) 1524 850506 Office Fax: +44 (0) 1524 850608 E-mail address [email protected] www.alfa.com Product Safety Department 1.4. Emergency telephone number Call Carechem 24 at +44 (0) 1865 407333 (English only); +44 (0) 1235 239670 (Multi-language) SECTION 2: HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION 2.1. Classification of the substance or mixture CLP Classification - Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 Physical hazards Flammable solids Category 2 (H228) Substances/mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases Category 3 (H261) Health hazards Based on available data, the classification criteria are not met Environmental hazards Based on available data, the classification criteria are not met ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ALFAA45589 Page 1 / 9 SAFETY DATA SHEET Misch metal Revision Date 19-Mar-2018 ______________________________________________________________________________________________ 2.2. Label elements Signal Word Warning Hazard Statements H228 - Flammable solid H261 - In contact with water releases flammable gases May form combustible dust concentrations in air Precautionary Statements P231 + P232 - Handle under inert gas.
    [Show full text]
  • Odorox, Odourized Oxygen Material Safety Data Sheet ______
    Revision Date , Issuing Date 10-Feb-2011, Page 1 / 10 _____________________________________________________________________ Odorox, Odourized Oxygen Material Safety Data Sheet _____________________________________________________________________ 1. PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION Product Name Odorox, Odourized Oxygen Product Code(s) 027-03-0006 UN-Number UN3156 Recommended Use Industrial use. Supplier Address* Linde Gas North America LLC - Linde Merchant Production Inc. - Linde LLC 575 Mountain Ave. Murray Hill, NJ 07974 Phone: 908-464-8100 www.lindeus.com Linde Gas Puerto Rico, Inc. Las Palmas Village Road No. 869, Street No. 7 Catano, Puerto Rico 00962 Phone: 787-641-7445 www.pr.lindegas.com Linde Canada Limited 5860 Chedworth Way Mississauga, Ontario L5R 0A2 Phone: 905-501-1700 www.lindecanada.com * May include subsidiaries or affiliate companies/divisions. For additional product information contact your local customer service. Chemical Emergency Phone Chemtrec: 1-800-424-9300 for US/ 703-527-3887 outside US Number 2. HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION WARNING! Emergency Overview Oxidizer Accelerates combustion and increases risk of fire. Irritating to eyes, respiratory system and skin Contents under pressure Keep at temperatures below 52°C / 125°F Appearance Colorless Physical State Compressed gas. Odor Extremely disagreeable OSHA Regulatory Status This material is considered hazardous by the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200). Potential Health Effects Odorox, Odourized Oxygen, Material Safety Data Sheet , Revision Date , Page 2 / 10 ___________________________________________________________________ Principle Routes of Exposure Inhalation. Eye contact. Skin contact. Acute Toxicity Inhalation Dimethyl sulfide is irritating to the respiratory system. Oxygen is not acutely toxic under normal pressure. Oxygen is more toxic when inhaled at elevated pressures. Depending upon pressure and duration of exposure, pure oxygen at elevated pressures may cause cramps, dizziness, difficulty breathing, convulsions, edema and death.
    [Show full text]
  • SAFETY STANDARD for HYDROGEN and HYDROGEN SYSTEMS Guidelines for Hydrogen System Design, Materials Selection, Operations, Storage, and Transportation
    NSS 1740.16 National Aeronautics and Space Administration SAFETY STANDARD FOR HYDROGEN AND HYDROGEN SYSTEMS Guidelines for Hydrogen System Design, Materials Selection, Operations, Storage, and Transportation Office of Safety and Mission Assurance Washington, DC 20546 PREFACE This safety standard establishes a uniform Agency process for hydrogen system design, materials selection, operation, storage, and transportation. This standard contains minimum guidelines applicable to NASA Headquarters and all NASA Field Centers. Centers are encouraged to assess their individual programs and develop additional requirements as needed. “Shalls” and “musts” denote requirements mandated in other documents and in widespread use in the aerospace industry. This standard is issued in loose-leaf form and will be revised by change pages. Comments and questions concerning the contents of this publication should be referred to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Headquarters, Director, Safety and Risk Management Division, Office of the Associate for Safety and Mission Assurance, Washington, DC 20546. Frederick D. Gregory Effective Date: Feb.12, 1997 Associate Administrator for Safety and Mission Assurance i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The NASA Hydrogen Safety Handbook originally was prepared by Paul M. Ordin, Consulting Engineer, with the support of the Planning Research Corporation. The support of the NASA Hydrogen-Oxygen Safety Standards Review Committee in providing technical monitoring of the standard is acknowledged. The committee included the following members: William J. Brown (Chairman) NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH Harold Beeson NASA Johnson Space Center White Sands Test Facility Las Cruces, NM Mike Pedley NASA Johnson Space Center Houston, TX Dennis Griffin NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Alabama Coleman J. Bryan NASA Kennedy Space Center Florida Wayne A.
    [Show full text]
  • FIREDOC Vocabulary List, 3Rd Edition
    FIREDOC Vocabulary List, 3rd Edition II^STT United states Department of Commerce XI I National Institute of Standards and Technology NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS & TECHNOLOGY Research Information Center Gaithersburg, MD 20899 DATE DUE Demco, inc. 38-293 NIST Special Publication 779 FIREDOC Vocabulary List, 3rd Edition Nora H. Jason Center for Fire Research National Engineering Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899 (Supersedes NBSIR 85-3231 and NBSIR 87-3545) February 1990 U.S. Department of Commerce Robert A. Mosbacher, Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology John W. Lyons, Director National Institute of Standards U.S. Government Printing Office For sale by the Superintendent and Technology Washington: 1990 of Documents Special Publication 779 U.S. Government Printing Office (Supersedes NBSIR 85-3231 Washington, DC 20402 and NBSIR 87-3545) Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 779 104 pages (Feb. 1990) CODEN: NSPUE2 Contents Acknowledgments v Introduction 1 Symbol Notation 1 Terms Beginning with A 3 Terms Beginning with B 11 Terms Beginning with C 15 Terms Beginning with D 23 Terms Beginning with E 29 Terms Beginning with F 33 Terms Beginning with G 43 Terms Beginning with H 45 Terms Beginning with I 51 Terms Beginning with J 55 Terms Beginning with K 57 Terms Beginning with L 59 Terms Beginning with M 63 Terms Beginning with N 69 Terms Beginning with O 71 Terms Beginning with P 73 Terms Beginning with Q 81 Terms Beginning with R 83 Terms Beginning with S 87 iii Terms Beginning with T 95 Terms Beginning with U 101 Terms Beginning with V 103 Terms Beginning with W 105 Terms Beginning with X 107 Terms Beginning with Y 109 Terms Beginning with Z Ill iv Acknowledgments Richard D.
    [Show full text]
  • Autoignition Temperature Determinations and Their Relationship to Other Types of Potential Ignition Sources and Their Applicatio
    I. CHEM. E. SYMPOSIUM SERIES NO. 58 AUTOIGNITION TEMPERATURE DETERMINATIONS & THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER TYPES OF POTENTIAL IGNITION SOURCES & THEIR APPLICATION TO PRACTICAL SITUATIONS D J Lewis Developments in the measurement of autoignition temperature values are reviewed and the differences between various methods noted. For certain applications, the volume of mixture which can potentially ignite is considerably different to that used in laboratory determinations and the effect of volume on autoignition temperature is analysed. A method of extrapolation which links in to data relating to flame kernal establishment by other ignition sources is outlined and the application of autoignition temperature values to practical situations is discussed in detail. INTRODUCTION Standard test methods for the determination of autoignition temperatures of vaporised liquids and gases in air at atmospheric pressure have been available in various forms since 1930. A considerable number of values for different fuels (both as pure materials and mixtures) have been published and have found specific application as regards the selection of electrical equipment for hazardous locations. Recently there have been developments relating to new methods for determining a reaction threshold temperature for liquid and solid materials in air and also regarding the distinction between the temperatures at which cool flame behaviour will be produced and at which normal combustion type flames result. The combination of economic pressures and higher standards of chemical processing safety is leading to the increasing use of autoignition temperature values under conditions widely different from those used to determine them. As a result it is appropriate to review the autoignition temperature test methods and techniques for the application of such values to practical situations.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Investigation of Spontaneous Heating
    Fire Investigation of Spontaneous Heating Author: Donald E Berg, Senior Principal Consultant, Envista Forensics The investigation of spontaneous heating fires can be challenging and come with a unique set of circumstances due to many factors; evidence Highlights is consumed, a site is left with little or no evidentiary material, or collected evidence sent for laboratory analysis does not show the presence of • Self-Heating Spontaneous chemical residues. Additionally, burn patterns from such fires can be Combustion difficult to interpret. • Autoignition of Fires The methodology for performing an origin and cause investigation after • Investigation of Spontaneous a spontaneous heating fire does not change, but the efforts to determine Ignition the specific area of origin needs to be well established before spontaneous • Case Study and Myths ignition can be confirmed. This type of investigation requires in-depth analyses of the events leading up to the fire including witness statements, a precise timeline, weather conditions (including the temperature and humidity), and the location of any contributing factors, such as material remains or product residue. Spontaneous Combustion Due to Self-Heating The 2021 edition of the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), chapter 5, section 5.7.4.1.1.5, describes spontaneous combustion due to self-heating as a special form of smoldering ignition that does not involve an external heating process. This happens when an exothermic reaction within the material leads to ignition and burning. According to the NFPA, when a material is able to dissipate the heat generated by internal exothermic reactions, it is considered ignition by self-heating. If the generated heat cannot be dissipated to the surroundings, the material will rise in temperature and a smolder front can be formed.
    [Show full text]