T H E C O G N I T I V E B I A S C O D E X – Kognitive Verzerrungen

We store memories differently based We notice things already primed in on how they were experienced Too Much What Should We memory or repeated often We reduce events and lists Tip of the tongue phenomenon Bizarre, funny, visually striking, or Information

Remember? to their key elements Levels–of–processing effect anthropomorphic things stick out more than non-bizarre/unfunny things

Absent–mindedness Next–in–line effect

Part–set cueingSerial–position effect effect

Google effect

Testing effect

Memory inhibition We discard specifics Recency effect Suffix effect Leveling and sharpening Primacy effect DurationModality neglect effect Misinformation List–lengtheffect effect to form generalities Serial recall effect We notice when something has changed

Availability heuristic Attentional bias Illusory truth effect Mere–exposure effect Context effect Cue–dependent forgetting Mood–congruent memory bias Frequency illusion Baader–Meinhof Phenomenon Peak–end rule Empathy gap Fading affect bias Omission bias Base rate fallacy

Bizarreness effect Negativity bias Humor effect Von Restorff effect We edit and reinforce ImplicitStereotypical stereotypes bias Picture superiority effect Self–relevance effect Negativity bias some memories after the fact Implicit associationPrejudice Anchoring Conservatism Contrast effect Spacing effect Distinction bias Focusing effect Suggestibility Framing effect We are drawn to details False memory Money illusion Misattribution of memory Weber–Fechner law SourceCryptomnesia confusion that confirm our own existing beliefs Confirmation bias Congruence bias We favor simple–looking options Less–is–better effect Post–purchase rationalization Choice–supportive bias and complete information over Occam's razor Selective perception Conjunction fallacy Observer–expectancy effect complex, ambiguous options Experimenter's bias Bike–sheddingLaw of Triviality effect Observer effect Rhyme–as–reason effect Expectation bias Ostrich effect Subjective validation We notice flaws in others Belief bias Information bias Continued influence effect Semmelweis reflex more easily than we Ambiguity bias notice flaws in ourselves To avoid mistakes, Bias blind spot Status quo bias Naïve cynicism we aim to preserve autonomy Social comparison effect Naïve realism Decoy effect and group status, and avoid Confabulation Reactance Clustering illusion irreversible decisions Reverse psychology Insensitivity to sample size System justification Neglect of probability Anecdotal fallacy Backfire effect Illusion of validity We tend to find stories and Endowment effect Masked–man fallacy Recency illusion patterns even when looking Processing difficulty effect Gambler's fallacy Pseudocertainty effect Hot–hand fallacy at sparse data Disposition effect Illusory correlation Zero–risk bias Pareidolia Unit bias Anthropomorphism To get things done, we tend IKEA effect Group attribution error Loss aversion to complete things we've Ultimate attribution error Generation effect Stereotyping invested time and energy in Essentialism Escalation of commitment Functional fixedness Irrational escalation Moral credential effect Sunk cost fallacy Just–world hypothesis Argument from fallacy Authority bias IdentifiableAppeal victim to novelty effect Automation bias Bandwagon effect Placebo effect Hyperbolic discounting Peltzman effect Out–group homogeneity bias We fill in characteristics from To stay focused, we favor the Cross–race effect Risk compensation In–group favoritism stereotypes, generalities, immediate, relatable thing Effort justification Halo effect Cheerleader effect Trait ascription bias Positivity effect and prior histories in front of us Not invented here Reactive devaluation Well–traveled road effect Illusory superiority Illusion of control Mental accounting Appeal to probability fallacy DefensiveFundamental attribution attribution hypothesis error Normalcy bias BarnumForer effect effect Murphy's Law Actor–observerSelf–serving bias bias Zero sum bias Survivorship bias Subadditivity effect Optimism bias Denomination effect The magical number 7 ± 2

Illusion of transparency Egocentric bias Curse of knowledge Spotlight effect Extrinsic incentive error Illusion of external agency Illusion of asymmetric insight

Hard–easy effect Dunning–Kruger effect We imagine things and people Lake Wobegone effect

Third–person effect

Restraint bias Declinism False consensus effect Moral luck we're familiar with or fond of To act, we must be confident we Projection bias Impact bias Social desirability bias Overconfidence effect Outcome bias

Planning fallacy Hindsight bias Pessimism bias as better Time–saving bias can make an impact and feel what Self–consistency bias

Pro–innovation bias Telescoping effect Telescoping we do is important retrospection Rosy

Need To We simplify probabilities and numbers Not Enough Act Fast to make them easier to think about Meaning We project our current mindset and We think we know what assumptions onto the past and future other people are thinking