ISSN 1809-127X (online edition) © 2011 Check List and Authors Chec List Open Access | Freely available at www.checklist.org.br Journal of lists and distribution pecies S

of northeasternAmphibians and Brazil of the Refúgio de Vida Silvestre ists L Mata do Junco, municipality of Capela, state of Sergipe,

1,2,* 1,3 1 Sérgio Augusto Abrahão 4 Morato , André Magnani 5 Xavier de Lima , Daniele 6 Cristina Pries Staut , Renato Gomes 1 Faria , João 1 Pedro de Souza-Alves , Sidney 7 Feitosa Gouveia , Michela Rossane Cavilha Scupino , Ramon Gomes and Marcelo José da Silva

1 STCP Engenharia de Projetos Ltda. Rua Euzébio da Motta, 450. CEP 80530-260. Curitiba, PR, Brazil. 2 Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná, Faculdade de Ciências Exatas e de Tecnologia. Rua Sidney A. Rangel Santos, 238. CEP 82010-330. Curitiba, PR, Brazil. 3 Universidade Federal do Paraná. Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Conservação. CP 19010. Curitiba, PR, Brazil. 4 Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Departamento de Biologia, Laboratório de Herpetologia e Ictiologia. Cidade Universitária Prof. José Aloísio de Campos Cidade, Avenida Marechal Rondon, Jardim Rosa Elze. CEP 49100-000. São Cristóvão, SE, Brazil. 5 Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Biológicas (Zoologia). Cidade Universitária. CEP 58059-900. João Pessoa, PB, Brazil. 5 Universidade Federal de Goiás, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Evolução. ICB IV, Campus II. CEP 74001-970. Goiânia, GO, Brazil. 6 SEMARH – Secretaria de Meio [email protected]. e Recursos Hídricos do Estado de Sergipe. Avenida Gonçalo Prado Rollemberg, 53. CEP 49001-410. Aracaju, SE, Brazil. * Corresponding author. E-mail: Abstract:

The Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest has high diversity levels of and reptiles, but there is a lack of richness survey at several areas, while a high level of deforestation is already known. The biome is highly endangered in northeastern Brazil, and few protected areas have been the main mechanism for providing the conservation. We studied the Refúgio da Vida Silvestre Mata do Junco, a recently established conservation unit in this biome, at the Capela municipality, in the state of Sergipe. Field surveys and literature review were conducted between 2007-2009, revealing 33 species of anuran amphibians and 26 of reptiles (one turtle, ten and 15 ). The presence of rare and endemic species suggests an important role of this area as a source remnant of the northeastern Atlantic Forest herpetological community.

Introduction

as a herpetological survey and the definition of many The Brazilian herpetofauna is one of the richest in the management actions. This paper presents the results of World (Duellman 1990), and the Atlantic Forest stands as the survey on the herpetofauna of the RVSMJ. This study the most important domain regarding endemic species of had focused on the occurrence and spatial distribution both amphibians and reptiles in Brazil (Pombal and Gordo of amphibians and reptiles species, which allow us to 2004; Marques and Sazima 2004). In northeastern Brazil, suggest further research and management actions for this at least 82 species of anurans, one cecilian, 94 snakes, two Materialsarea. and Methods crocodilians, 44 lizards, nine amphisbaenians and eight Study area turtles are known to the biome (Argôlo 2004; Freitas and ca. 2 Silva 2005). However, the amphibians and reptiles at large areas of the region remain unknown, which includes the The RVSMJ (Figure 1) comprises of 9 km , and is state of Sergipe. Few studies on the herpetofauna species located in the Capela municipality, at the Sergipe state, community in this state were already conducted at the northeastern Brazil (37°03’30” W, 10°32’30” S). Originally, Serra de Itabaiana National Park (Carvalho et al. 2005)e.g. the Capela surrounding area was covered by Atlantic Forest, and at Crasto Forest (Arzabe et al.et 1998). al. Additionally,et but currently it is composed primarily by agriculture and recental. records of species inet Sergipe al. state wereet made al. ( livestock activities. The RVSMJ area includes two isolatedca Arzabe and Loebmann 2006; Delfim 2006; Santana forest fragments, mostly covered by secondary forest 2009; Noronha-Oliveira 2010; Caldas 2011; remnants, although altered open areas also occur ( . 25% Ferreira and Faria 2011). of the area). One small reservoir is found in the Lagartixo The Refúgio da Vida Silvestre MataCallicebus do Junco coimbrai(RVSMJ) River, the main hydrological resource of the reserve, is a conservation unit created in 2007, in order to protect Databelonging collection to the Japaratuba River basin. a population of the titi monkey ad libitum (Pitheciidae), an endangered and endemic species of the northeastern Atlantic Forest. For the management Data were acquired and by occasional strategies establishment in this conservation unit, observations of some of the authors (S.F.Gouveia, J.P. studies on several taxonomic groups were required, such Souza-Alves, R.G. Faria and M.J. Silva) between 2007-2009, Check List | Volume 7 | Issue 6 | 2011 756 Morato et al. | Herpetofauna of Refúgio de Vida Silvestre Mata do Junco, Sergipe, Brazil

and also by a field survey conducted at 15-19 September, sites (Figure 1) as an auxiliary method. One pitfall station 2009, following the Ecological Rapid Assessment (ERA) with ten 40 liters buckets was built at each site, with (Sobrevilla and Bath 1992). During the ERA, amphibians eight meters between each bucket, connected by a 50 cm and reptiles were recorded by active search and manual height polyethylene fence-guide (drift-fence). Traps were capture, and by pitfall traps with drift-fence (Campbell and checked daily, totaling 100 buckets-day of total effort. Christman 1982; Fitch 1992; Franco and Salomão 2002). Voucher specimens collected during the ERA were fixed Three collectors actively searched for specimens at day in 10% formalin and later preserved in 70% ethanol, and (from 9:00h to 12:00h and from 15:00 to 18:00h) and at stored at the Museu de História Natural Capão da Imbuia night (from 20:00h to 00:00h), in distinctive habitat types (MHNCI) in municipality of Curitiba, Paraná state, Brazil. and local potential breeding sites, using several tracks Specimens collected previously to the ERA were stored inside and at the surrounding area of the RVSMJ (forests; at the Coleção Herpetológica da Universidade Federal wetlands, marshes and riparian vegetation; altered open de Sergipe (CHUFS). Sampling was performed under the areas). ICMBio/SISBIO permit number 20518. Voucher specimens Pitfall traps were set up in secondary forests at two are listed in the Appendix 1.

Figure 1.

The Refúgio da Vida Silvestre Mata do Junco, Capela municipality, state of Sergipe, Brazil, with the pit-fall traps sites (yellow squares) and the Resultsactive search and sites Discussion (blue circles).

Forest remnants at southern Bahia had revealed between A total of 59 species were found at RVSMJ (Table 1), 13-39 species per fragment (Silvano and Pimenta 2003).et al. which 26 were and 33 were species. In the Paraíba state, 14 amphibians and 37 reptiles were Figures 3-5 present some of the collected taxa. Only anuran found at Mata do Buraquinho, João Pessoa (Santana species were found among the amphibians (12 genera of 2008). seven families). Among reptiles, one chelid turtle, 10 lizards Since the data we had gathered and the other studies (from 10 genera and seven families) and 15 snakes (14 were performed at singular ways, this data collection does genera, six families) were recorded. The richness we found not allow conclusive comparisons between the species is similar to other localities in the Atlantic Forestet of al. Sergipe, richness of the RVSMJ and other previously studied sites. or even among other states of the northeastern Brazil. At Even though, we have made some inferences on it, as a the Serra de Itabaiana National Park, Carvalho et al. (2005) trial to understand the richness pattern over this region. found 55 species (23 amphibians and 32 reptiles); in the Following this statement, by anecdotal comparison with Crasto forest, 17 anurans were found (Arzabe 1998). the species richness presented above, we suggest that the In other states, the richness is somewhat different. Atlantic richness presented for the RVSMJ perhaps would be close Check List | Volume 7 | Issue 6 | 2011 757 Morato et al. | Herpetofauna of Refúgio de Vida Silvestre Mata do Junco, Sergipe, Brazil

to the total richness of the area. We only had comparative at least the two first species were not described yet. sampling effort for the five days of the ERA at RVSMJ Ecologically, the local herpetological assemblage (including active search and pitfall methods), that had suggests a complex composition, including species with shown a reduction in the increase of the species among the distinct requirements, as usual for Atlantic Forest sites last days (day 1 = 23 species; day 2 = 28; day 3 = 30; day 4 = (Marques and Sazima 2004; Pombal-Jr. and Gordo 2004). 33; day 5 = 35) (Figure 2). The species accumulation curve The majority of recorded species is ubiquitous in the study indicates that the ERA alone was not sufficient to record area, inhabitinge.g. Ischnocnema more than onespp., kind Proceratophrys of habitat, although renalis, the amphibians and reptiles in the area, since 24 species Coleodactylussome species meridionaliswere found exclusively and Taeniophallus in the litter occipitalis of the (40%) were found only by other methods. However, the forests ( Mesoclemmys tuberculata and Eunectes 59 species records obtained by the ERA together with murinus ), the occasional observations seem to be representative in aquatic ( for the RVSMJ herpetological community, based on the ), or in the open altered areas (Table 1). In other herpetofaunal richness verified from the other studied hand, due to the existence of larval stages in life history of sites in the Atlantic Forest of northeastern Brazil cited most of the amphibiani.e. Ischnocnema species, it might be expected a local above. Future studies must be carried on to confirm this hydrological resourceset al. dependency for this group, with hypothesis. Ischnocnemafew exceptions vinhai ( spp. [Pombal and Gordo 2004; Carvalho 2005]). In addition, the record of (Figure 4H) achieves an expansion on thee.g. known distribution range of this species, which were caalready recorded at Porto Seguro region, state of Bahia ( Lynch and Duellman 1997; Frost 2010), at a distance . of 670 km southward. e.g. Epicrates assisi, MabuyaAlthough heathi the and study Cnemidophorus site is located occeliferat the Atlantic Forest biome, some of the recorded species ( et al. ) are typical from open habitats of northeastern Brazil, such as Caatinga,e.g. theAmeiva nearest ameiva biome (see Vanzolini 1980; Freitas and Silva 2005, 2007), or have a widespread distribution ( Figure 2. ; see Vitt and Colli 1994). There is not any Species accumulation curve obtained during the Ecological previous and similar survey that would allow one to infer Rapid Assessment conducted between 15 to 19 September, 2009, at the on the original distribution of these species, what suggests Refúgio da Vida Silvestre Mata do Junco, Capela municipality, state of Sergipe, Brazil. two hypothesis: (1) the actual distribution range of those species are a result of natural and historical conditions; or (2) the species would have been following habitats shifts Anyway, some increase inCaiman this richness latirostris must be driven by human colonization. expected. The occurrence of others conspicuous groups, According to our data, despite the several impacts like crocodilians (such as ) and this area has been suffering throughout the human amphisbaenians, was advised by local people at the RVSMJ colonization, what remains from its original structure and surrounding area, and certainly further assessment has still maintaining essential environmental conditions, will enlarge the present richness. Perhaps every other which allow the safeguarding of some Atlantic Forest study in Sergipe, just as this one, has its amphibian and amphibian and reptiles species of the state of Sergipe. reptile richness potentially underestimated, since any Finally, we pointed out suggestions that should be taken study had really stressed out the sampling methods at as the management prime actions for the RVSMJ and distinctive seasons, what would likely increase the richness surrounding area, in order to avoid any population decline. of each study site. Another issue that certainly would favor The emphasis should be applied for the establishment for increasing the species richness is relatedDendropsophus to the demand of forest corridors, concerning metapopulation viability. of studies with taxonomic approaches. We were unable to Ischnocnema Forest restoration certainly will be required, and some Pseudopaludicolaidentify specimens of two anuran taxa: of the species recorded herein (with priority for those sp. (Figure 3E) and sp. (Figure 4G). Also, a forest dependents) must be used as models for evaluating sp. was recorded only by hearing. These the success of the management actions, as indicative three genera have an intricate , but it seems that species.

Check List | Volume 7 | Issue 6 | 2011 758 Morato et al. | Herpetofauna of Refúgio de Vida Silvestre Mata do Junco, Sergipe, Brazil

Table 1.

Herpetofaunal species recorded at Refúgio de Vida Silvestre Mata do Junco, state of Sergipe, Brazil, related to habitat types of record. Habitat types: F = Forests; W = Wetlands (marshes and margins of lake and reservoir); R = rivers and streams; OA = Open areas (including the altered ones); Sample method: M = Manual; PF = Pit-fall trap; V = Visual record; A = Auditory record; PH = Photographed by M.J.Silva. * Species recorded during the Ecological Rapid AssessmentTAXA method from 15 to 19 September,HABITAT TYPE 2009. SAMPLE METHOD AMPHIBIA Anura Brachycephalidae Ischnocnema ramagii Ischnocnema vinhai (Boulenger, 1888) F M, PF * Ischnocnema (Bokermann, 1975 “1974”) F M * Bufonidae sp. F M, PF * Rhinella granulosa Rhinella jimi (Spix, 1824) F, W M * Cycloramphidae (Stevaux, 2002) F, W, OA M * Proceratophrys renalis (Miranda-Ribeiro, 1920) F M, PF * Corythomantis greeningi Dendropsophus branneri Boulenger, 1896 OA M Dendropsophus sp. (Cochran, 1948) W M * Dedropsophus decipiens F M * Dedropsophus elegans (A. Lutz, 1925) W, R, OA M Dedropsophus minutus (Wied, 1824) W, OA M Dedropsophus nanus (Peters, 1872) W, OA M Hypsiboas albomarginatus (Boulenger, 1889) W, R M Hypsiboas crepitans (Spix, 1824) F, W M * Hypsiboas faber (Wied, 1824) F, W M * Hypsiboas raniceps (Wied, 1821) W M * Phyllomedusa bahiana Cope, 1862 W M * Phyllomedusa nordestina A. Lutz, 1925 F, W M * auratus Caramaschi, 2006 F, W M Scinax eurydice (Wied, 1821) F, OA M Scinax x-signatus cf. F M Scinax ruber cf. F, OA M Leiuperidae gr. W, OA M * albifrons Physalaemus cuvieri (Spix, 1824) F, W M, PF * Pseudopaludicola Fitzinger, 1826 W, OA M * sp. W, OA A * fuscus Leptodactylus natalensis (Schneider, 1799) OA A * Leptodactylus latrans A. Lutz, 1930 F M * Leptodactylus spixii (Steffen, 1815) W M * Leptodactylus troglodytes cf. F, OA M Leptodactylus vastus A. Lutz, 1926 OA M Microhylidae A. Lutz, 1930 F, W M * Dermatonotus muelleri REPTILIA (Boettger, 1885) W, OA M * Testudines Chelidae Mesoclemmys tuberculata (Lüderwaldt, 1926) R V * Iguanidae Iguana iguana Polychrotidae (Linnaeus, 1758) F V, PH * Anolis ortonii Tropiduridae Cope, 1868 F M Tropidurus hispidus Gekkonidae (Spix, 1825) OA M * Hemidactylus mabouia Sphaerodactylidae (Moreau de Jonnès, 1818) OA V * Coleodactylus meridionalis Teiidae (Boulenger, 1888) F M * Ameiva ameiva Cnemidophorus ocellifer (Linnaeus, 1758) OA V * cf. OA V * Check List | Volume 7 | Issue 6 | 2011 759 Morato et al. | Herpetofauna of Refúgio de Vida Silvestre Mata do Junco, Sergipe, Brazil

Table 1. Continued.

TAXA HABITAT TYPE SAMPLE METHOD Kentropyx calcarata Tupinambis merianae Spix, 1825 F, OA M Scincidae (Duméril and Bibron, 1839) F, OA V, PH * Mabuya heathi Typhlopidae Schmidt and Inger, 1951 OA M, PF * Typhlops brongersmianus Boidae Vanzolini, 1976 F M * Boa constrictor Corallus hortulanus Linnaeus, 1758 F PH Epicrates assisi (Linnaeus, 1758) F M Eunectes murinus Machado, 1945 F, OA PH (Linnaeus, 1758) W PH Chironius bicarinatus Chironius exoletus (Wied, 1820) F M Spilotes pullatus (Linnaeus, 1758) F M Dipsadidae (Linnaeus, 1758) F V Erythrolamprus aesculapii Helicops angulatus (Linnaeus, 1766) F, OA M Oxyrhopus petola (Linnaeus, 1758) W M nattereri (Linnaeus, 1758) F, OA M Taeniophallus occipitalis Steindachner, 1870 OA V * (Jan, 1863) F M * ibiboboca Viperidae (Merrem, 1820) F, OA M * Bothrops leucurus

Wagler, 1824 F M

A B A B

C D C D

E F E F

G H G H

Figure 3. Figure 4. Rhinella granulosa Phyllomedusa Rhinella Somejimi amphibianProceratophrys species renalis recordedDendropsophus from Refúgio branneri da Vida bahiana SomeScinax amphibianruber speciesPhysalaemus recorded cuvieri from RefúgioLeptodactylus da Vida SilvestreDendropsophus Mata do Junco, stateHypsiboas of Sergipe, albomarginatus Brazil. (A) Hypsiboas Silvestrenatalensis Mata doLeptodactylus Junco, state vastus of Sergipe,Dermatonotus Brazil. (A) muelleri crepitans(B) Hypsiboas; (C) raniceps ; (D) ; Ischnocnema; (B) gr.Ischnocnema ; (C) vinhai ; (D) (E) sp.; (F) ; (G) ; (E) ; (F) ; (G) ; (H) ; Photographs by S.A.A. Morato. sp.; (H) ; Photographs by S.A.A. Morato. Check List | Volume 7 | Issue 6 | 2011 760 Morato et al. | Herpetofauna of Refúgio de Vida Silvestre Mata do Junco, Sergipe, Brazil

A B Caldas,Phyllodytes F.L.S., C.B. punctatus De-Carvalho, F.F.A. Gomes, E.B. Freitas, R.A. Santos, B.D. Silva, D.O. Santana and R.G. Faria. 2011. Amphibia, CheckAnura, List Hylidae, Caramaschi and Peixoto, 2004: Distribution extension and first record out of the type locality. 7(1): 55-56. In Herpetological Campbell,communities: J.A. and S.P.a symposium Christman. of 1982. the Society Field techniques for the Study for herpetologicalof Amphibians andcommunity Reptiles analysis; and the p. 193-200 Herpetologists’ N.J. Scott League. Jr. (ed.).

Washington D.C.: C D DepartmentIn of Interior. Parque Nacional Serra de Carvalho,Itabaiana: C.M., LevantamentoJ.C. Vilar and F.F. da Oliveira.Biota. 2005. Répteis e anfíbios; p. 39- 61 C.M. Carvalho and J.C. Vilar (eds.). PsilophthalmusAracaju: paeminosus IBAMA. Delfim, F.R., E.M. Gonçalves Check and List S.T. Silva. 2006. Squamata, , : Distribution extension, new state record. 2(3): 89-92. Duellman,In W.E. 1990. Four Herpetofaunas Neotropical Rainforests. in Neotropical rainforests: comparative composition, history, and resource use; p. 455–505 E F A.H. Centry (ed.). Lithobates New Haven: palmipes Yale University Press. Ferreira,Herpetology A.S. and Notes R.G. Faria. 2011. First record of (Spix, 1824) (Anura: Ranidae) for the State of Sergipe, Brasil. Herpetological 4: 139-140. Review Fitch, H.S. 1992. Methods for sampling populationsIn and their relative success. Técnicas de Coleta23 e Preparação(1): 17-19. de Vertebrados Franco,para F.L. Fins and Científicos M.G. Salomão. e Didáticos. 2002. Répteis; p. 77-115 P. Auricchio and M.G. Salomão (eds.). A São herpetofauna Paulo: Instituto da mata Pau Brasil atlântica de G H nordestina.História Natural. Freitas, M.A. and T.F.S. Silva. 2005.A herpetofauna das Caatingas e áreas de altitudes Pelotas:do Nordeste USEB. brasileiro. 161 p. Freitas, M.A. and T.F.S.Amphibian Silva. 2007. Species of the World: an online reference. Pelotas: USEB. 384 p. Frost, D.R. 2010. Version 5.4 (8 April, 2010). Electronic Database accessible at http:// research.amnh.org/vz/herpetology/amphibia. AmericanEleutherodactylus Museum of Natural History, New York, USA. Captured on 03 August, 2010.Special Lynch,Publication. J.D. and W.E. Natural Duellman. History 1997. Museum, University of the genus of Kansas I J in western Ecuador. Systematics, ecology, and biogeography. In: 23: 236 p. Marques, O.A.V. andEstação I. Sazima. Ecológica 2004. Juréia-Itatins: História natural Ambiente dos Físico, répteis Flora da Estaçãoe Fauna. Ecológica Juréia-Itatins; p. 257-277 O.A.V. Marques and W. Duleba (eds.). DryadosauraRibeirão nordestina Preto: Holos. Herpetological Review Noronha-Oliveira, M.V., C. Brito-de-Carvalho and R.G. Faria. 2010. In (NCN). Estação Ecológica41(4): 512. Juréia- Pombal-Jr.,Itatins: J.P.Ambiente and M. Físico,Gordo. Flora 2004. e AnfíbiosFauna. anuros da Juréia; p. 243-256 O.A.V. Marques and W. Duleba (eds.). K L Ribeirão Preto: Holos. Santana, G.G., W.L.S. Vieira, G.A. Pereira-Filho, F.R. Delfim, Y.C.C.Biotema Lima and K.S. Vieira. 2008. Herpetofauna de um fragmento de Floresta Atlântica no Estado da Paraíba, Região Nordeste do Brasil. 21(1): 75-84. Scinax auratus Santana, D.J., H.C. Costa, L.O. Drummond, P.L. FerreiraCheck List and R.N. Feio. 2009. Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae, : Distribution extension, new state records, and distributionIn map. 5(2): 246-248. Silvano, D.L. and B.V.S. Pimenta. 2003. DiversidadeCorredor de deanfíbios Biodiversidade na Mata Figure 5. naAtlântica Mata Atlânticado Sul da do Bahia. Sul da P.I.Bahia. Prado, E.C. Landau, R.T. Moura, L.P.S. Mesoclemmys tuberculata Pinto, G.A.B. Fonseca and K. Alger (org.). Iguana Some iguana reptile speciesTropidurus recorded from hispidus Refúgio da VidaColeodactylus Silvestre Evaluación CD-ROM, Ecológica Ilhéus, Rápida IESB/CI/CABS/ - un manual meridionalisMata do Junco, stateMabuya of Sergipe, heathi Brazil. (A)Cnemidophorus ocellifer ; paraUFMG/UNICAMP. usuários de América Latina y el Caribe. Typhlops(B) brongersmianus; (C) Epicrates assisi ; Boa (D) constrictor Sobrevilla, C. and P. Bath. 1992. Philodryas nattereri; (E) Taeniophallus; (F) occipitalis Micrurus ibiboboca; (G) Arlington: RépteisThe Nature das ; (H) ; (I) ; (J) Conservancy.Caatingas. 231 p. ; (K) ; (L) ; Vanzolini, P.E., A.M.M. Ramos-Costa and L.J. Vitt. 1980. Photographs by S.A.A. Morato. Ameiva Rio ameivade Janeiro: Academia BrasileiraCanadian de Ciências. Journal of161 Zoology p. Acknowledgments: Vitt, L.J. and G.R. Colli. 1994. The geographical ecology of a neotropical , (Teiidae) in Brazil. We thanks to SEMARH – Secretaria de Meio 72: 1986-2008. Ambiente e Recursos Hídricos do Estado de Sergipe – to the financial support of this study, and to Charles Wikler for the revision of the English Received: August 2010 Literatureversion of this Cited paper. Last Revised: November 2011 As serpentes dos cacauais do sudeste da Bahia. Accepted: November 2011 Published online: December 2011 Argôlo, A.J.S. 2004. Itapotihyla Ilhéus: Editorial responsibility: Henrique C. Costa Editus/UESC.langsdorffii 260 p. Check List Appendix 1. Arzabe, C. and D. Loebmann.2006. Amphibia, Hylidae, : Distribution extension. 2(2): 33-34. Amphibians :Collected Ischnocnema specimens. ramagii Arzabe, C., C.X., Carvalho and M.A. Goes Costa. 1998.AnuranHerpetological assemblages Journal in Crasto Forest ponds (Sergipe State, Brazil): comparative : CHUFS.986;Ischnocnema MHNCI.7247, vinhai composition and calling activity patterns. MHNCI.7248, MHNCI.7249, MHNCI.7250, MHNCI.7251, MHNCI.7252, 8(2): 111-113. MHNCI.7253, MHNCI.7254, MHNCI.7255; : Check List | Volume 7 | Issue 6 | 2011 761 Morato et al. | Herpetofauna of Refúgio de Vida Silvestre Mata do Junco, Sergipe, Brazil

Ischnocnema Physalaemus Rhinella cuvieri granulosa:MHNCI.7261; sp.: MHNCI.7262, MHNCI.7263, MHNCI.7264, LeptodactylusMHNCI.7293, fuscus: MHNCI.7294, MHNCI.7295,Leptodactylus MHNCI.7296; natalensis: MHNCI.7265, MHNCI.7266, Rhinella MHNCI.7267, jimi: MHNCI.7268; : CHUFS.973, MHNCI.7276, MHNCI.7277, MHNCI.7278; CHUFS.1249,Proceratophrys MHNCI.7270, renalis: MHNCI.7271, MHNCI.7272, CHUFS.977; LeptodactylusCHUFS.690, latrans: CorythomantisMHNCI.7273, MHNCI.7274; greening: CHUFS.1248,Dendropsophus MHNCI.7231, branneri: MHNCI.7279, MHNCI.7280, MHNCI.7281, MHNCI.7282, MHNCI.7283, MHNCI.7232; CHUFS.978, Dendropsophus MHNCI.7246; MHNCI.7284, Leptodactylus MHNCI.7285, MHNCI.7286; spixii: Leptodactylus sp.: CHUFS.981; Dedropsophus decipiens: troglodytes:CHUFS.608, MHNCI.7238,Leptodactylus MHNCI.7239, vastus: MHNCI.7240, MHNCI.7241, CHUFS.989, Dedropsophus MHNCI.7258, elegansMHNCI.7259, MHNCI.7260;Dedropsophus minutus: MHNCI.7242; Dermatonotus muelleri:cf. CHUFS.985; MHNCI.7243,Dedropsophus MHNCI.7244, nanus: MHNCI.7245;Hypsiboas albomarginatus Reptiles: AnolisCHUFS.660; ortonii: TropidurusCHUFS.963, hispidus: MHNCI.7228, CHUFS.993; : CHUFS.682; MHNCI.7230; ColeodactylusMHNCI.7269. meridionalis: CHUFS.685; Hypsiboas crepitans:CHUFS.991; : CHUFS.1221;Ameiva ameiva: CHUFS.1226,Kentropyx CHUFS.970, MHNCI.7287, MHNCI.7288, MHNCI.7289, MHNCI.7290, calcarataMHNCI.13387, MHNCI.13388;Mabuya heathi: CHUFS.1222, MHNCI.7291; Hypsiboas faber:CHUFS.969, MHNCI.7297, MHNCI.13391,Typhlops brongersmianus: MHNCI.13392; CorallusCHUFS.1218; hortulanus HypsiboasMHNCI.7298, raniceps: MHNCI.7299, MHNCI.7300, MHNCI.7301,Phyllomedusa MHNCI.7302, bahiana: Chironius: bicarinatus: CHUFS.1220; ChironiusCHUFS.1224, exoletus: MHNCI.13389; MHNCI.7303, MHNCI.7304; CHUFS.681, MHNCI.7237; Erythrolamprus aesculapii:MHNCI.13386; Helicops angulatus:: CHUFS.521; Phyllomedusa nordestina:CHUFS.966, MHNCI.7275;Scinax auratus: Scinax Oxyrhopus petola: CHUFS.352;Taeniophallus occipitalis: MHNCI.13393; CHUFS.968, eurydice: MHNCI.7233,Scinax MHNCI.7234, x-signatus: MHNCI.7235, MHNCI.7236;Scinax Micrurus CHUFS.350; ibiboboca: CHUFS.349; ruber CHUFS.684;Physalaemus albifrons:CHUFS.664; Bothrops leucurus: CHUFS.351; MHNCI.13384, cf. CHUFS.687; cf. CHUFS.671; gr. MHNCI.13385; MHNCI.13390, MHNCI.13394; : MHNCI.7256, MHNCI.7257; MHNCI.7292, CHUFS.2323.

Check List | Volume 7 | Issue 6 | 2011 762