DOCSLIB.ORG

The Great Pyramid Hoax: the Conspiracy to Conceal the True

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Great Pyramid Hoax: the Conspiracy to Conceal the True For my wife, Louise, and my children , Jamie and Nina . forever . — THE — GREAT PYRAMID HOAX “Egyptologists consider the ochre-painted Khufu cartouche in the Great Pyramid as the ultimate proof that this pyramid belongs to the Fourth Dynasty pharaoh Khufu. But much controversy surrounds its authenticity. If the Khufu cartouche is indeed a hoax, then the implications are tremendous. Scott Creighton has undertaken a very bold and meticulous investigation into this mystery. The Great Pyramid Hoax is a must-read book for all seekers of truth.” ROBERT BAUVAL, AUTHOR OF THE SOUL OF ANCIENT EGYPT “An intriguing narrative, The Great Pyramid Hoax expertly weaves its way through the sands of time, as it revisits one of Egyptology’s most contentious issues—the dating of the Great Pyramid. In the best traditions of alternative research Creighton takes the reader on a personal journey of exploration, skillfully weaving powerful themes upon clear emotional expression, as he attempts to uncover the veracity behind one of Egypt’s most endearing mysteries. A must- read for those searching for the truth.” LORRAINE EVANS, EGYPTOLOGIST, DEATH HISTORIAN, AND AUTHOR OF KINGDOM OF THE ARK ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This book would not have been possible without the input, assistance, and encouragement of many individuals. I would first like to express my profound and sincere gratitude to the team at Inner Traditions r Bear & Company, whose professionalism and guidance took much of the pain out of producing this work. The late Zecharia Sitchin, a world-renowned scholar and international bestselling author, paved the way for this book, and without his early insights into this controversy, this work most likely would never have seen the light of day. This can be said equally of the late Alan F. Alford, whose dedicated research into this subject inspired much of my own investigations. In 1998, Alford wrote: My challenge to Egyptologists is this. Find the Howard Vyse diaries and show them to me. If I cannot find at least three incriminating statements in those diaries, I will drop my argument that the workmen’s graffiti was forged. It is with a considerable sense of regret that Alford, who departed this Earth much too soon, could not witness just how prophetic his words were to become as the evidence from three pages of Vyse’s private diary, presented later in this book, will demonstrate. Patricia Usick of the British Museum and Roger Bettridge of the Centre for Buckinghamshire Studies helped immensely by providing access to the Hill facsimiles and the Vyse family archive, respectively. I would particularly like to thank Mr. Bettridge for his great generosity in assisting me with the transcription of some difficult passages from Colonel Vyse’s private journal. A special mention and thanks must also be extended to the staff in the Archive Department of the Mitchell Library in Glasgow, who also helped transcribe some difficult passages. My good friend Sean Damer deserves credit here too for his unstinting support and encouragement over many years. And none of this would have been at all possible without the great help and assistance of George and Jim, who would tirelessly read and offer feedback to each draft of this manuscript. My children, Jamie and Nina, were both very young when all of this began. They would always listen (sometimes reluctantly it has to be said), but they were always curious and would often ask questions. I thank them both for some quite marvelous questions; questions that only a child can ask. Above all, my dearest wife, Louise, deserves all the plaudits for she has truly had to put up with the most—and it wasn’t always plain sailing. When things got tough she was always there to help. And when they got really tough she was always the first with her shoulder to the wheel. Not even a severe head injury, which so nearly took her life, would hold her back. There are no words that can ever encapsulate my sincere gratitude in having this truly remarkable woman in my life. I thank you all. SCOTT CREIGHTON , MIDSUMMER’S DAY , 2016 Louise Creighton (Photo: Scott Creighton) CONTENTS Title Page Dedication Epigraph Acknowledgments Foreword by Laird Scranton Introduction: A Controversial Claim Chapter 1. Making History AN IMPOSSIBLE FORGERY SITCHIN’S FORGERY CLAIM CHAPTER ONE SUMMARY Chapter 2. Seeking Suphis CHAPTER TWO SUMMARY Chapter 3. Man of Means QUESTIONS ABOUT VYSE’S CHARACTER CHAPTER THREE SUMMARY Chapter 4. Colonel Vyse’s Creation CHAPTER FOUR SUMMARY Chapter 5. EXHIBIT 1: Other Chambers, Other Texts" CHAPTER FIVE SUMMARY Chapter 6. EXHIBIT 2: The Silent Journal CHAPTER SIX SUMMARY Chapter 7. EXHIBIT 3: The Eyewitness TIME AND PLACE THE WRONG NAME THE PAINTED NAMES CHAPTER SEVEN SUMMARY Chapter 8. EXHIBIT 4: Mystery Marks Made In Situ MARKS MADE TO MEASURE MISSING PARTS NOT SO IMPOSSIBLE MARKS MARKS PAINTED IN SITU A MYSTERY SIGN CHAPTER EIGHT SUMMARY Chapter 9. EXHIBIT 5: A Peculiar Distribution FURTHER DISTRIBUTION ANOMALIES CHAPTER NINE SUMMARY Chapter 10. EXHIBIT 6: The Lie of the Landscapes HILL’S ORIENTATIONS CHAPTER TEN SUMMARY Chapter 11. EXHIBIT 7: Cartouche Contradictions BLOCK ORIENTATION PAINT OVERLAP THE PAINT RUNNELS PAINT SPOTS THE PEBBLES THE PLASTER THE PENCIL CHAPTER ELEVEN SUMMARY Chapter 12. EXHIBIT 8: Signs Out of Time ANOTHER SIGN? THE TWO STAFFS CHAPTER TWELVE SUMMARY Chapter 13. EXHIBIT 9: The Journal Speaks MORE CARTOUCHE ANOMALIES JOURNAL ENTRY, MAY 27, 1837 JOURNAL ENTRY, JUNE 16, 1837 THE TWO SPELLINGS OF SUPHIS INSTRUCTING FRAUD WALTER ALLEN VINDICATED CHAPTER THIRTEEN SUMMARY Chapter 14. Evidence That Demands a Verdict Footnotes Endnotes Bibliography About the Author About Inner Traditions • Bear & Company Books of Related Interest Copyright & Permissions Index FOREWORD Work in the field of archaeology is somewhat like prospecting for gold. Both are disciplines of discovery that require the utmost care, patience, and perseverance but only occasionally reward the practitioner with a substantive return. When archaeological studies do produce such a return, a correct understanding of the significance of a finding may require specialized knowledge or rest on subtleties of understanding that the typical layperson may not possess. This means that the average person may not always be competent to evaluate the claims of competing researchers. Meanwhile, truly productive finds are the stuff from which archaeological careers are molded, academic reputations fostered, and theoretical ground staked. Knowing this, it seems clear that professional researchers must be subject to ongoing motivation to produce such claims. Likewise, Egyptology is a field in which a small number of professionals have historically exercised a high degree of control over such things as access to sites, distribution of financial resources, and publication of results. Great egos tend to flock to positions with this degree or quality of control. In such an environment, it seems inevitable that practitioners might sometimes be tempted to take personal advantage of their specialized knowledge or position and leverage it to influence a career-making claim. Structures on the Giza plateau in Egypt represent the most obvious reference points by which a modern observer may infer the outlook and intentions of our ancient ancestors. Foremost among these (second only to the incomparable Sphinx) is the Great Pyramid, or Pyramid of Khufu. Its sheer size, central position on the Giza plateau, and structural precision serve as an open invitation to students of ancient mysteries to make it a focus of their attention. The call of the Great Pyramid is made even more enticing by the many uncertainties that attend this great edifice, coupled with the relative sparseness of evidence on which these uncertainties often rest. For example, theories abound in relation to how the pyramid may have been built, what practical functions it might have served in ancient times, what undiscovered hidden chambers it might potentially house, whether slaves or paid workers were enlisted to construct it, what special qualities of electricity or resonance its stone blocks might possess, and so on. First among the mysteries of the Great Pyramid is the persistent question of who actually built it. To those of us who see likelihood in the existence of civilizations prior to ancient Egypt, there is a temptation to credit the Great Pyramid to some advanced culture now lost to the mists of time. However, from an academic perspective, the era of origin for the Great Pyramid is considered to be a closed question: the consensus is that it was commissioned by the second pharaoh of the Fourth Dynasty of Egypt, a king named Khufu who ruled circa 2550 BCE. However, some modern-day researchers express doubt about a view-point that casts as a royal tomb a structure that, to all outward evidences, never actually housed a pharaoh’s body. We might be inclined to simply set this inconvenient circumstance aside if we were confident that the official viewpoint was upheld by other unshakable evidence. But as we shall see as this book progresses, such does not always seem to be the case. Despite the often careful fieldwork that has historically been carried out by archaeologists, we could argue that there is a kind of myopia at work in the field of Egyptology that can limit official perspectives on the likely purposes of ancient structures. The prevailing mind-set is one from which we might imagine future archaeologists who explore cultures of the twenty-first century excavating “local temple complexes” and “palaces,” where today one sees only strip malls and Home Depots. In the real world, expectation can influence outcome. It has been famously said that if we choose to consult a surgeon with a problem, we can reasonably expect to hear a surgical solution proposed. The same is true in fields like Egyptology, where despite the arguably ethical intentions of researchers, findings can be influenced by strong personalities, personal motives, and academic specialties.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ROYAL STATUES Including Sphinxes
    ROYAL STATUES Including sphinxes EARLY DYNASTIC PERIOD Dynasties I-II Including later commemorative statues Ninutjer 800-150-900 Statuette of Ninuter seated wearing heb-sed cloak, calcite(?), formerly in G. Michaelidis colln., then in J. L. Boele van Hensbroek colln. in 1962. Simpson, W. K. in JEA 42 (1956), 45-9 figs. 1, 2 pl. iv. Send 800-160-900 Statuette of Send kneeling with vases, bronze, probably made during Dyn. XXVI, formerly in G. Posno colln. and in Paris, Hôtel Drouot, in 1883, now in Berlin, Ägyptisches Museum, 8433. Abubakr, Abd el Monem J. Untersuchungen über die ägyptischen Kronen (1937), 27 Taf. 7; Roeder, Äg. Bronzefiguren 292 [355, e] Abb. 373 Taf. 44 [f]; Wildung, Die Rolle ägyptischer Könige im Bewußtsein ihrer Nachwelt i, 51 [Dok. xiii. 60] Abb. iv [1]. Name, Gauthier, Livre des Rois i, 22 [vi]. See Antiquités égyptiennes ... Collection de M. Gustave Posno (1874), No. 53; Hôtel Drouot Sale Cat. May 22-6, 1883, No. 53; Stern in Zeitschrift für die gebildete Welt 3 (1883), 287; Ausf. Verz. 303; von Bissing in 2 Mitteilungen des Kaiserlich Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Athenische Abteilung xxxviii (1913), 259 n. 2 (suggests from Memphis). Not identified by texts 800-195-000 Head of royal statue, perhaps early Dyn. I, in London, Petrie Museum, 15989. Petrie in Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland xxxvi (1906), 200 pl. xix; id. Arts and Crafts 31 figs. 19, 20; id. The Revolutions of Civilisation 15 fig. 7; id. in Anc. Eg. (1915), 168 view 4; id. in Hammerton, J. A.
    [Show full text]
  • Specular Reflection from the Great Pyramid at Giza
    Specular Reflection from the Great Pyramid at Giza Donald E. Jennings Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA (retired) email: [email protected] Posted to arXiv: physics.hist-ph April 6, 2021 Abstract The pyramids of ancient Egypt are said to have shone brilliantly in the sun. Surfaces of polished limestone would not only have reflected diffusely in all directions, but would also likely have produced specular reflections in particular directions. Reflections toward points on the horizon would have been visible from large distances. On a particular day and time when the sun was properly situated, an observer stationed at a distant site would have seen a momentary flash as the sun’s reflection moved across the face of the pyramid. The positions of the sun that are reflected to the horizon are confined to narrow arcs in the sky, one arc for each side of the pyramid. We model specular reflections from the pyramid of Khufu and derive the annual dates and times when they would have been visible at important ancient sites. Certain of these events might have coincided with significant dates on the Egyptian calendar, as well as with solar equinoxes, solstices and cross-quarter days. The celebration of Wepet-Renpet, which at the time of the pyramid’s construction occurred near the spring cross-quarter day, would have been marked by a specular sweep of sites on the southern horizon. On the autumn and winter cross-quarter days reflections would have been directed to Heliopolis. We suggest that on those days the pyramidion of Khafre might have been visible in specular reflection over the truncated top of Khufu’s pyramid.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy, Myths & Legends of the Ancient Egyptians
    Astonomy, Myts & Legends of te Ancient Egyptans Volume 1 by Monica Sevila Contnts Stars and Galaxies Te Constlatons Te Giza Pyramids and te Belts Stars of Orion Ancient Egyptan Pyramids: Resurrecton Machines Ancient Egyptans and te Sphinx Te Sun Ancient Egyptans and te Creaton of te World Te Pharaohs: Te Horus Kings Ancient Egyptans and teir Tombs Te Sun and te Gods Stars and Galaxies The early universe was extremely hot. As it cooled, sub atomic particles began to clump together and formed the first atom, the hydrogen atom. Later, as the universe began to cool even further, dust and hydrogen gas joined together through the force of gravity and became dense enough to form the first stars, the protostars. Through extreme heat and pressure, hydrogen gas atoms began to fuse together. The result of this nuclear fusion produced light and heat energy. This process describes the formation of the first stars. Billions and billions of stars were created through this process and grouped together to form the galaxies within the universe today. Galaxies are massive systems of stars, dust, and gas held together by gravity. Gravity causes stars to attract each other and clump together into groups. Because stars have extreme amounts of mass, they exert the force of gravity, the attractive force which draws other objects with mass, such as other stars, to itself. Our sun and our solar system is part of a galaxy known as the Milky Way. It is described as a spiral galaxy because its shape looks like a spiral. On a dark night, the edge of the Milky Way can be seen in the Northern Sky.
    [Show full text]
  • The Routledge Dictionary of Egyptian Gods and Goddesses
    The Routledge Dictionary of Egyptian Gods and Goddesses The Routledge Dictionary of Egyptian Gods and Goddesses provides one of the most comprehensive listings and descriptions of Egyptian deities. Now in its second edition, it contains: ● A new introduction ● Updated entries and four new entries on deities ● Names of the deities as hieroglyphs ● A survey of gods and goddesses as they appear in Classical literature ● An expanded chronology and updated bibliography ● Illustrations of the gods and emblems of each district ● A map of ancient Egypt and a Time Chart. Presenting a vivid picture of the complexity and richness of imagery of Egyptian mythology, students studying Ancient Egypt, travellers, visitors to museums and all those interested in mythology will find this an invaluable resource. George Hart was staff lecturer and educator on the Ancient Egyptian collections in the Education Department of the British Museum. He is now a freelance lecturer and writer. You may also be interested in the following Routledge Student Reference titles: Archaeology: The Key Concepts Edited by Colin Renfrew and Paul Bahn Ancient History: Key Themes and Approaches Neville Morley Fifty Key Classical Authors Alison Sharrock and Rhiannon Ash Who’s Who in Classical Mythology Michael Grant and John Hazel Who’s Who in Non-Classical Mythology Egerton Sykes, revised by Allen Kendall Who’s Who in the Greek World John Hazel Who’s Who in the Roman World John Hazel The Routledge Dictionary of Egyptian Gods and Goddesses George Hart Second edition First published 2005 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 270 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10016 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • The Function of the Room with a Window in the Hatshepsut Temple at Deir El-Bahari 38 O B
    INSTITUT DES CULTURES MÉDITERRANÉENNES ET ORIENTALES DE L’ACADÉMIE POLONAISE DES SCIENCES ÉTUDES et TRAVAUX XXVII 2014 O B Palace or Slaughterhouse? The Function of the Room with a Window in the Hatshepsut Temple at Deir el-Bahari 38 O B The Upper Terrace of the Hatshepsut temple at Deir el-Bahari is divided into three complexes: the Main Sanctuary of Amun, on the main axis of the temple, the Solar Cult Complex, north of it, and the Complex of the Royal Cult, which occupies the southern part of the terrace. The latter of them consists of two cult chapels – the bigger one dedicated to Hatshepsut, and the smaller one to her father Tuthmosis I – each preceded by a vestibule, and a square open courtyard at the entrance to the Complex. East of the compound lies a small, undecorated room of an irregular shape customarily called ‘a room with a window’.1 Scholars tend to refer to it as a palace, following R. Stadelmann’s assumption that the room with a window in the Deir el-Bahari temple of Hatshepsut was a precursor of the later temple palaces.2 Stadelmann based his interpretation on the location of the room within the temple and the existence of the window in the façade wall of the structure. He compared this opening in the northern wall of the room to a window of appearance, a feature char- acteristic for the Ramesside temple palaces, though known best from relief representations preserved in the palaces of Amarna.3 Only a few scholars questioned this interpretation, pointing to the atypical, irregular shape and, again, location of the structure,4 as well as the form and the positioning of the window.5 A completely different approach is represented by J.
    [Show full text]
  • Biblical Assyria and Other Anxieties in the British Empire Steven W
    James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Libraries Libraries & Educational Technologies 2001 Biblical Assyria and Other Anxieties in the British Empire Steven W. Holloway James Madison University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.lib.jmu.edu/letfspubs Part of the European Languages and Societies Commons, Fine Arts Commons, Library and Information Science Commons, Literature in English, British Isles Commons, Near Eastern Languages and Societies Commons, and the Theory and Criticism Commons Recommended Citation “Biblical Assyria and Other Anxieties in the British Empire,” Journal of Religion & Society (http://moses.creighton.edu/jrs/2001/ 2001-12.pdf) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Libraries & Educational Technologies at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Libraries by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of Religion & Society Volume 3 (2001) ISSN 1522-5658 Biblical Assyria and Other Anxieties in the British Empire Steven W. Holloway, American Theological Library Association and Saint Xavier University, Chicago Abstract The successful “invasion” of ancient Mesopotamia by explorers in the pay of the British Museum Trustees resulted in best-selling publications, a treasure-trove of Assyrian antiquities for display purposes and scholarly excavation, and a remarkable boost to the quest for confirmation of the literal truth of the Bible. The public registered its delight with the findings through the turnstyle- twirling appeal of the British Museum exhibits, and a series of appropriations of Assyrian art motifs and narratives in popular culture - jewelry, bookends, clocks, fine arts, theater productions, and a walk-through Assyrian palace among other period mansions at the Sydenham Crystal Palace.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mysterious Pyramid on Elephantine Island: Possible Origin of the Pyramid Code
    Archaeological Discovery, 2017, 5, 187-223 http://www.scirp.org/journal/ad ISSN Online: 2331-1967 ISSN Print: 2331-1959 The Mysterious Pyramid on Elephantine Island: Possible Origin of the Pyramid Code Manu Seyfzadeh Lake Forest, CA, USA How to cite this paper: Seyfzadeh, M. Abstract (2017). The Mysterious Pyramid on Ele- phantine Island: Possible Origin of the After the step pyramids of the Third Dynasty and before the true pyramids of Pyramid Code. Archaeological Discovery, the Fourth Dynasty, seven mysterious minor step pyramids were built by King 5, 187-223. Sneferu1 and a predecessor. None of them were tombs. Clues as to why they https://doi.org/10.4236/ad.2017.54012 were built emerged from analyzing their orientation to objects in the sky Received: August 26, 2017 worshiped by the ancient Egyptians and hinted at a renewed preoccupation Accepted: September 19, 2017 with measuring time and the flow of the Nile. The first of the seven was built Published: September 22, 2017 on the Island of Elephantine, Egypt. Its orientation suggests that an aspect of Copyright © 2017 by author and the star Sirius was being enshrined. This paper proposes that this aspect per- Scientific Research Publishing Inc. tained to the different timings of its annual invisibility period observable from This work is licensed under the Creative either the capital at Memphis in Lower Egypt or from Upper Egypt at Ele- Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0). phantine. I argue that these periods, measured in days, were converted to di- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ mensions in cubits, and consequently these numbers and the resulting geo- Open Access metric relationships between them became important.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Keeper of Genesis, Robert Bauval, Graham Hancock, Arrow
    Keeper of Genesis, Robert Bauval, Graham Hancock, Arrow, 1997, 0099416360, 9780099416364, . In Keeper Of Genesis, Robert Bauval And Graham Hancock Present A Tour De Force Of Historical And Scientific Detective Work And Answer The Following Questions:When And Where Did History Begin?When Was The Genesis Of Civilisation In Egypt?How And Why Were The Great Sphinx And The Three Pyramids Of Giza Designed To Serve As Pasrts Of An Immense Three-Dimensional Model Of The Sky Of 'First Time'?What Is Contained In The Rectangular Chamber That Seismic Surveys Have Located In The Bedrock Far Below The Paws Of The Sphinx?What Lies Behind The Mysterious Doors Recently Discovered At The End Of A Previously Unexplored Shaft Inside The Great Pyramid?And Does Mankind Have A Rendezvous With Destiny - A Rendezvous Not In The Future, But In The Distant Past - At A Precise Place And Time?Using Sophisticated Computer Simulations Of The Ancient Skies To Crack The Millenial Code That The Monuments Transcribe, Bauval And Hancock Set Out A Startling New Theory Concerning The Pyramid Texts And Other Archaic Egyptian Scriptures.. Secret chamber the quest for the hall of records, Robert Bauval, 1999, History, 433 pages. Mysteries of Atlantis Revisited The Century's Greatest Psychic Confronts One of the World's Oldest Mysteries, Edgar E. Cayce, Mar 15, 1997, Body, Mind & Spirit, 240 pages. The sixth in a ten-book series dedicated to interpreting the writings of American occultist Edgar Cayce reveals new evidence of the remains of the lost civilization of Atlantis .... The Master Game Unmasking the Secret Rulers of the World, Graham Hancock, Robert Bauval, 2011, History, 636 pages.
    [Show full text]
  • Rev. AH Sayce and His Intellectual Approach
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2007 A non-traditional traditionalist: Rev. A. H. Sayce and his intellectual approach to biblical authenticity and biblical history in late-Victorian Britain Roshunda Lashae Belton Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Belton, Roshunda Lashae, "A non-traditional traditionalist: Rev. A. H. Sayce and his intellectual approach to biblical authenticity and biblical history in late-Victorian Britain" (2007). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1655. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1655 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. A NON-TRADITIONAL TRADITIONALIST: REV. A. H. SAYCE AND HIS INTELLECTUAL APPROACH TO BIBLICAL AUTHENTICITY AND BIBLICAL HISTORY IN LATE-VICTORIAN BRITAIN A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Roshunda Lashae Belton B.A., Louisiana Tech University, 1999 M.A., Louisiana Tech University, 2001 December 2007 For my father, the late Roosevelt Belton who encouraged me to dream big and for my mother, Velma Belton for being my cheerleader ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The completion of this dissertation could not have been achieved without the support and encouragement of my mentor and advisor Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Decorated North Wall in the Tomb of Tutankhamun (Kv 62)
    AMARNA ROYAL TOMBS PROJECT VALLEY OF THE KINGS Occasional Paper No. 3 THE DECORATED NORTH WALL IN THE TOMB OF TUTANKHAMUN (KV 62) (THE BURIAL OF NEFERTITI? II) By Nicholas Reeves, FSA With A Review of the Geophysical Data By George Ballard, FRICS THE DECORATED NORTH WALL IN THE TOMB OF TUTANKHAMUN (KV 62) (THE BURIAL OF NEFERTITI? II) ABSTRACT This paper revisits an earlier discussion, The Burial of Nefertiti? (ARTP Occasional Paper No. 1), to consider in greater detail the painted north wall in the Burial Chamber (room J) of Tutankhamun’s tomb (KV 62). The changes imposed upon this wall’s three separate scenes are here identified and analysed, and the conclusions found to support the view that KV 62 – architecturally the sepulchre of a queen – had been both intended and employed for the burial of Nefertiti in her capacity as Akhenaten’s heir, Smenkhkare-djeserkheperu. The manner in which this tomb’s outer chambers were adapted and pressed into service for Tutankhamun’s use a decade later – leaving its original occupant in place and undisturbed – is clearly established. In a supplement to this study, George Ballard – a leading authority on the use of radar and other remote-sensing technologies in the investigation of historic buildings and structures – provides an independent review of the principal geophysical investigations carried out within and around KV 62 since 2015. Contrary to earlier assessments, Ballard is able to conclude that the data collected is both broadly consistent and essentially in line with archaeological indicators and expectations. Nicholas Reeves, BA PhD FSA, is an archaeologist and Egyptologist, Director of the Amarna Royal Tombs Project, Valley of the Kings, and a senior associate of the University of Arizona Egyptian Expedition.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyses Concerning the Impossibility of Fixing a Date for Building the Great Pyramid of Khufu the Eruption
    ANALYSES CONCERNING THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF FIXING A DATE FOR BUILDING THE GREAT PYRAMID OF KHUFU THE ERUPTION الجيزة تختار عيدها القومي يوم بناء هرم خوفو الجيزة ترجئ اﻻحتفال بعيدها القومي الجديد.. ولجنة من "اﻵثار" وجامعة القاهرة للتأكد من التاريخ الجيزة تلغى اﻻحتفال بعيدها القومى »الجديد« بعد هجوم اﻷثريين على تاريخ بناء الهرم ‘......good for amateurs' speculations’ Regardless of all the above said; THE MAGNIFECENCE OF THE GREAT PYRAMID OF KHUFU, IS AN IMPUTUS: FOR DEEPER RESEARCH SIMPLY By analyzing the procedure in the press releases we can see: Assuming that the building project started on the first day of the flood during year one of Khufu’s reign IS SPECULATION And from available chronologies a date for Khufu’s accession CAN NEVER BE PRECISE Accordingly the heliacal rising of Sirius, (of that year), was interpolated from astronomical data by adding 30 days the river rose on DATE = 23 AUGUST BP 4479 THIS IS A CONCLUSION BASED ON UNRELIABLE EVIDENCE CONSEQUENTLY, IN MY OPENION, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO FIX A DATE FOR BUILDING THE GREAT PYRAMID OF KHUFU HOWEVER, I HAVE BEEN INFORMED THAT FURTHER RESEARCH IS UNDERWAY AIMING AT THE POSSIBILITY OF A DATE ARGUMENTS DID THE EGYPTIANS START BUILDING ON THE FIRST DAY OF THE FLOOD ? OR WERE THERE OTHER CONSIDERATIONS ? LET US REVIEW SOME HINTS ON THE GREAT PYRAMID MAGNIFISENCE It is logical to consider that a pyramid project is born with a DECISION followed by PREPARATIONS before starting. THE DECISION was made following a tradition of the royal ancestors and the capability to undertake But building the Great pyramid was more ambitious Pyramids built before king Snofru used small limestone blocks quarried locally and could be transported on donkey back At his Bent and Red pyramids building blocks became bigger and were possibly dragged on long sloping ramps.
    [Show full text]
  • DIALOGUES with the DEAD Comp
    Comp. by: PG0844 Stage : Proof ChapterID: 0001734582 Date:13/10/12 Time:13:59:20 Filepath:d:/womat-filecopy/0001734582.3D1 OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – FIRST PROOF, 13/10/2012, SPi DIALOGUES WITH THE DEAD Comp. by: PG0844 Stage : Proof ChapterID: 0001734582 Date:13/10/12 Time:13:59:20 Filepath:d:/womat-filecopy/0001734582.3D2 OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – FIRST PROOF, 13/10/2012, SPi Comp. by: PG0844 Stage : Proof ChapterID: 0001734582 Date:13/10/12 Time:13:59:20 Filepath:d:/womat-filecopy/0001734582.3D3 OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – FIRST PROOF, 13/10/2012, SPi Dialogues with the Dead Egyptology in British Culture and Religion 1822–1922 DAVID GANGE 1 Comp. by: PG0844 Stage : Proof ChapterID: 0001734582 Date:13/10/12 Time:13:59:20 Filepath:d:/womat-filecopy/0001734582.3D4 OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – FIRST PROOF, 13/10/2012, SPi 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University press in the UK and in certain other countries # David Gange 2013 The moral rights of the author have been asserted First Edition published in 2013 Impression: 1 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization.
    [Show full text]