Selection of Processes for Welding Steel Rails by N.S
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Selection of Processes for Welding Steel Rails by N.S. Èai and T.W. Eagar* in Railroad Rail welding, Railway Systems and Management Assoc., Northfield, NJ, 421, 1985 ABSTRACT The advantages and limitations of several conventional and prospective rail welding processes are reviewed with emphasis on the heat input rate, on joint preparation, on post weld grinding and on resultant metallurgical structure. Particular attention is given to thermit, flash and oxyacetylene processes with some discussion of the potential of resistance butt, electroslag, laser and elec- tron beam processes. Simple models of the processes are presented to aid in understanding the limiting parameters for each process. It is concluded that there is little chance of increasing the speed of existing oxycetylene and flash processes due to heat transport limitations, nor would such changes be desirable from a metallurgical point of view. INTRODUCTION In recent years there has been a tremendous demand for economical, pro- ductive and reliable techniques for welding of steel rail. The traditional pro- cesses of thermit, oxacetylene and flash welding are well proven and generally exhibit a low rate of repair when properly controlled'. Nonetheless, there is in- creasing interest in newer technologies such as laser, electron beam or homopolar pulse2 and in application of older techniques such as electroslag.' In the present paper, these processes are reviewed briefly in terms of their heat input characteristics. It will be shown that this approach allows one to estimate the thermal cycles for each process and to infer certain advantages and disadvantages for each process based on classification by heat input rate. 'Materials Processing Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Cam- bridge, MA 02139 422 RAILROAD RAIL WELDING CLASSIFICATION OF WELDING PROCESSES There have been many attempts to classify welding processes (4-6), and each has its own strengths; however, a rational approach to classification has to ad- dress the resultant parameter of interest. For weldingof highcarbonsteels, such as rails, the critical coolingrate between 800 and 500OC is of great importance since this parameter controls final weld microstructureand strength. Accord- ingly, it seems appropriate to classify welding processes for rail by the thermal history. c he-re are two types of heating which may be applied to a metal, viz. super- ficial and volumetric. Surface heatingoccurs when the outer portion of the metal is brought to an elevated temperature, and the heat diffuses into the bulk of themetal. Thermit,eleciroslag, flash, oxyacetylene,arc, laser andelectron beam processes produce surface heating. In these cases, the interior of the metal is controlled by the thermal diffusivity, a. Dimensionally, it can be shown that the thermal diffusivity is related to the distance, x, that heat travels from the surface in a time, t, by Since a for steel is approximately 0.1 cm2/sec, a steel bar heated on its surface will be heated to a depth of 0.3 cm (}à inch) in one second, 1.0 cm (% inch) in ten seconds, 3.0 cm (1% inch) in 100 seconds and so forth. There are very few physical processes which produce volumetric heat genera- tion in metals. Two examples are induction and electrical resistance, both of which generate heat by exciting the electrons in the metal. Nonetheless, these processes are also limited by the diffusion of the magnetic and electrical fields into the sample. While this magnetic diffusivity is much faster than the ther- mal diffusivity of the steel, too high a frequency of inductive power or two short a pulse of resistive current will result in a "skin effect" which approximates surface heating. Generally for steel rails, the optimum induction frequency is around 1 to IOkHz, hence, the skin effect is only important for welds made in less than one millisecond, which currently is not a practical limitation. There is no common process which achieves volumetric cooling, hence, the cooling rate of a weld or any hot body of metal is controlled by the same basic parameters listed in Equation (1). Given this background, it can be seen that the heating and cooling of most rail welding processes is controlled by the surface heating process. Figure 1 representsaclassification of processes by the rateof surface heat input (i.e. sur- face power density). There are a number of advantages to using this classifica- tion. One is that the time to complete the weld is inversely related to the input power density. This is due to the fact that it requires a fixed amount of energy to raisesteel to(or near) its melting temperature. If this energy is absorbed very SELECTION OF PROCESSES FOR WELDING STEEL RAILS FIGURE 1. Typical surface power densities produced by various welding processes. quickly, i.e., high power densities, the time to produce the weld is reduced proportionally. The general time relationship of Figure 1 also illustrates another feature of thisclassification: as the time for completionof the weld decreases at high power densities, the need for automatic control increases. As an example of this, the low power density therrnit processis oftencontrolled by manually determining the time of crucible tapping; whereas no one would consider manually timing a higher power density laser or electron beam welding machine. In this latter case, the weld pool is produced in a few milliseconds and no human operator can respond at this speed. These last factors illustrate still more features of this classification scheme. Automatic controls generally result in higher costs for capital equipment. The equipment for thermit or electroslag welding is inexpensive; but homopolar, electron beam and laser equipment can be very expensive depending on how well automated it is made. In addition, it is often the case that the higher power density processes have narrower tolerances for error. For example, the root gap of a thick section laser or electron beam weld must usually be 0.5 mm (0.020 inch) or less, thus requiring machined end surfaces. In contrast, a thermit or electroslag weld can toleate gaps between 1.5 cm and 3 cm ('/, to lx inches). Theselimitations of high power density processes are not rigid. For example, it is possible todefocus a laser beam to a lower power density and thus achieve more tolerance for deviations in joint fit-up, however, one has to determine if the characteristics of thedefocused heat source justify the moreexpensive pro- cess. After all, a laser defocused to 10,000 watts/cm2is competing with the cost of a much less expensive arc welding machine! The most expensive high power density processes do have the advantage of being capable of simulating low density processes, whereas there is no method of extending thermit or arc pro- cessesto the power densities obtainable by laser and electron beam. SIMPLIFIED MODEL OF HEATING AND COOLING OF WELDS In order to illustrate the heating and cooling cycles produced by different 424 RAILROAD RAIL WELDING surface power densities, two known solutions to the solid heat conduction equa- tion were used.'. The solution for asemi-infinite, one-dimensional body heated on its surface is given by: where T is temperature Tois room temperature q is heat input density Q is density c is specific heat t is heating time x is the distance from the joint a is thermal diffusivity Thesolution for cooling of the same type of body with an arbitrary initial temperature gradient is given by: where f(xl) is the initial temperature distribution in the solid f is the length of the body, which in this case is defined as a very large value with respect to x and t as given in Equation 1. These two equations were programmed- - into a minicomputer and solved. The timeof heating (Equation 2) was adjusted to bringa steel sample above or close to the melting point. The sample was then allowed to cool by simple conduc- tion as described by Equation (3). Figure 2 gives some of the results of this analysis for surface heat inputsincreasing from400 to 8,000 watts/cml and heat times decreasing from 120 seconds to one second. It is seen that these parameters span the range of conventional rail welding processes in addition toarc welding. The natural consequences of Equation (1) in limiting the penetration of heat into the base metal at successively shorter heating times is evident. In an arc weld. at 3,000 watts/cml for four seconds, the heat affected zone is less than acentimeter wide. In a thermit weld, preheated with an oxyacetylene flame for over two minutes, the heat necessary to cause transformation of the steel to aus'tenite has travelled over three centimeters. While the numbers given in Figure 2 are only approximate for a given welding process, the trends are apparent. SELECTION OF PROCESSES FOR WELDING STEEL RAILS -q= ¥40W/cm I20cac heat q 80BW/cm2,35ça heat - q=1600W/cm2.10sec heal 13 q-30013W/crn2.4se~ heat L A q=8aa0w/~~2,1~~~hook B.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 DISTANCE FROM JOINT, <cm5 FIGURE 2. Temperature profiles produced at the end of heating for five different Input cower densities. The surface heat Inputs increase from 400 watts/cm* to 8.000 watts/cmz and the heat time decreases from 120 seconds to 1 second. A longer heating time is re- quired to raisethesurface temperature to the melting point at lowerpower densities and thus results in a flatter temperature distribution. Figures 3% b, and c give the cooling rates corresponding to the heat inputs of Figure2at locations of 0.1.1.0 and 3.0cm into the steel. In Figure 3c in par- ticular, it is seen that the maximum temperature in the heat affected zone is often not reached until a number of seconds after the end of heating.