DOCSLIB.ORG

Saint-Petersburg 2014—2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Saint-Petersburg 2014—2015 Saint-Petersburg 2014—2015 Contents Introduction 5 1. Social and economic situation in St. Petersburg in 2014 7 2. Organization of St. Petersburg management in 2014—2015 11 3. St. Petersburg budget execution in 2014 22 3.1. Execution of the revenue side 24 3.2. Execution of the expenditure side 30 3.3. Investment expenditure 53 3.4. Financing sources of St. Petersburg budget decit 55 3.5. St. Petersburg debt management in 2014 57 3.6. Execution of local budgets of municipal formations of St. Petersburg in 2014 58 3.7. Main characteristics of interrelations of St. Petersburg budget with the federal budget in 2014 59 4. St. Petersburg budget for 2015 and planned period of 2016 and 2017 62 4.1. St.Petersburg’s revenue side 62 4.2. St.Petersburg’s expenditure side 64 Appendixes 67 Saint-Petersburg. 2014—2015 3 Introduction Dear Readers! 2014 was approved by the Chamber of Control and Accounts Here is the next issue of annual publication with results of St. Petersburg in June 17, 2015. of social and economic situation in St. Petersburg for 2014 The Legislative Assembly of St. Petersburg has conducted and in the beginning of 2015; you can find here the system public hearing on draft law “On execution of St. Petersburg of St. Petersburg management arrangement; the main execution budget for 2014”. In accordance with St. Petersburg law measures of the municipal budget in 2014 are specified as well “On procedure of public hearing conduct on draft budget as main measures of St. Petersburg budget for 2015 and planned of St. Petersburg and annual draft report on execution period of 2016 and 2017 considering corrections approved by of St. Petersburg budget” and solution of the budget and finance the St. Petersburg Legislative Assembly in May 2015. committee dd 01.06.2015 the public hearing for draft law Section 1 “Social and economic in St. Petersburg “ On St. Petersburg budget execution for 2014” were conducted in 2014” states main measures characterizing social and via web-conferencing from 10 AM 11.06.2015 until 17 PM economic situation of St. Petersburg in the specified period. The 18.06.2015. Within the specified period the citizens were able section was prepared based on information of the Federal State to send their questions and comments to the draft law via Statistics Service (Petrostat) represented on the official site the official web-site of the Legislative Assembly. The law (http://petrostat.gks.ru); annual report of the Government of St. on budget execution was accepted by the Legislative Assembly Petersburg to the Legislative Assembly dd 08.04.2015; report on of St. Petersburg in June 24, 2015 and signed by St. Petersburg the social and economic development of St. Petersburg for 2014 Governor in July 3, 2015 No. 423-81. prepared by the Committee for Economic Policy and Strategic The report was approved: Planning. - for revenues amounting to 426,224,738 kRUB.; Section 2 “Organization of St. Petersburg management in - for expenditures amounting to 440,773,588 kRUB.; 2014-2015” describes the establishment of subject of the Russian - for deficit amounting to 14,548,850 kRUB. Federation — St. Petersburg city and it represents official Budget revenues of St. Petersburg for 2014 were 104.3% materials located on official Web-sites of the Legislative as compared to January-December 2013. The expenditure side Assembly of St. Petersburg (http://www.assembly.spb.ru), was executed by 97%. St. Petersburg Government (http://www.gov.spb.ru), Statutory Information on St. Petersburg law “On St. Petersburg budget Court (http://www.spbustavsud.ru), municipal government execution for 2014” in full is located on web-site of the Finance of St. Petersburg (http://омсу-спб.рф), other official information committee of St. Petersburg on the following web-site: materials. The most volumetric section of the digest is section http://www.fincom.spb.ru/comfin/acts/text.htm?id=808@cf_ Section 3 “Execution of St. Petersburg budget in 2014” npa_bud which states main measures of execution of municipal budget in Section 4 “St. Petersburg budget for 2015 and for planned 2014, - revenues, expenditures, budget deficit, financing sources period of 2016 and 2017” describes stages of budget process for budget deficit, amount of St. Petersburg government debt. in St. Petersburg for the budget of current 2015, main measures Execution of local budgets of municipal formations of municipal budget for 2015 are stated (revenues, expenditures, of St. Petersburg and main characteristics of interrelations budget deficit, financing sources of the budget deficit) of St. Petersburg budget with the federal budget in 2014 is given. considering corrections approved by the Legislative Assembly In April 08, 2015 the Governor of St. Petersburg rendered in June 3, 2015 (St. Petersburg Law No. 344-52 dd 08.06.2015). an annual report of the St. Petersburg Government for the last Information on the St. Petersburg draft budget and approved 2014 year in the Legislative Assembly of St. Petersburg. laws of St. Petersburg on the budget is timely and fully located The report on St. Petersburg budget execution for 2014 was on web-site of the St. Petersburg Finance Committee in Internet approved at the session of St. Petersburg Government in May 19, — http://www.fincom.spb.ru. Information is provided both 2015 and submitted for consideration of the Legislative in so called machine-readable format and can be freely used Assembly of St. Petersburg. The conclusion on result of external in any purposes including for pursuance of independent audit of the annual report on St. Petersburg budget execution for analytical studies. Saint-Petersburg. 2014—2015 5 1. Social and economic situation in St. Petersburg in 2014 In the report of the St. Petersburg Governor 1.1 Industrial production on performance results in 2014 made public in the During January-December 2014 the industrial Legislative Assembly of St. Petersburg in April 8, 2015 production index in St. Petersburg decreased by 8.2% it was observed that regardless of sti pressure of West as compared to the similar period of the last year and was sanctions, shocks on oil and hard currency markets 91.8%. e industrial production index in manufactures the city showed the best of possible results and entered which share falls to 93% of total volume of shipped in three best budget revenues in terms of volume as well industrial products was 91.0%. as it is in the leader team in terms of growth of tax and Reduction of product yield in food production including non-tax revenues. Petersburg is one of few subjects beverage foods and tobacco (IPI — 94.3%) has negatively of the Russian Federation where the real income aected total results of development of manufactures. of the population in 2014 did not drop but rather increased Enterprise performance results of this branch mainly are by 2.9%.Average nominal wage in our city has increased dened by reduction of beer (by 23.0%) and tobacco almost by 11% and amounted to 40, 660 RUR. (by 8.4%) production which is due to implementation St. Petersburg stability in 2014 was conrmed also of the state policy for reduction of scope of excessive use by growth of gross regional product by 1.5%. e result of alcoholic products and measures directed toward control is also considerably higher than the average Russia-wide of smoking, rise of excise duties and cost of alcoholic result. Turnover of St. Petersburg organizations was 109.5%. and tobacco products correspondingly. At the same time Public health service, education, transport and communi- this industrial sector has achieved increase in production cation branches were actively developed. Our city has of such product kinds as sausage products (by 12,3%), surprise many people in Russia by 6% export increase. confectionery (by 10,5%). And the main increase fell within the far-abroad countries. Negative aect on industry growth dynamics Stability of Petersburg economics within the reported of St. Petersburg in 2014 was caused by production ramp- period could not be shook even by the reduction down in production of electric equipment, electronic of industrial production index by 8.2% registered and optical equipment (IPI — 92.7%) and the production by Petrostat. Upon that other indicators did not show that output in production of vehicles and equipment has also out industry settled down so markedly. Enterprises reduced (IPI — 92.7%). e IPI in another sector increased quantity of product shipments by 7.5%, number of machine-building complex – production of machines of employees in the Petersburg industry remained and equipment in 2014 was 110% as compared to the similar at the level of the preceding year and average monthly period of the preceding year. Positive dynamic of product salary increased almost by 10%. output was also observed in production of other non- According to data of independent experts the volume metallic mineral commodities (IPI — 109.5%). e IPI of construction and reconstruction of industrial areas in metallurgical production and production of nished in Petersburg increased by 31.6% in 2014 as compared metal products for January-December 2014 was 90,2% to 2013 and amounted to 465 thousand m2. Almost as compared to the similar period of the preceding year. 400 thousand m2 of them are new areas. Now the city task e IPI in textile and garment manufacture was 83.3% is to open all producing units there as soon as practicable. as compared with January-December 2013. Decrease Natural population increase has been continued for in production of industrial gases, detergents has aected three consecutive years. e infant mortality rate adversely on the IPI for “Chemical production” business is traditionally one of the lowest in the country and in the (IPI — 76.5%).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Izhorians: a Disappearing Ethnic Group Indigenous to the Leningrad Region
    Acta Baltico-Slavica, 43 Warszawa 2019 DOI: 10.11649/abs.2019.010 Elena Fell Tomsk Polytechnic University Tomsk [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7606-7696 Izhorians: A disappearing ethnic group indigenous to the Leningrad region This review article presents a concise overview of selected research findings rela- ted to various issues concerning the study of Izhorians, including works by A. I. Kir′ianen, A. V. Labudin and A. A. Samodurov (Кирьянен et al., 2017); A. I. Kir′ianen, (Кирьянен, 2016); N. Kuznetsova, E. Markus and M. Muslimov (Kuznetsova, Markus, & Muslimov, 2015); M. Muslimov (Муслимов, 2005); A. P. Chush′′ialova (Чушъялова, 2010); F. I. Rozhanskiĭ and E. B. Markus (Рожанский & Маркус, 2013); and V. I. Mirenkov (Миренков, 2000). The evolution of the term Izhorians The earliest confirmed record of Izhorians (also known as Ingrians), a Finno-Ugrian ethnic group native to the Leningrad region,1 appears in thirteenth-century Russian 1 Whilst the city of Leningrad became the city of Saint Petersburg in 1991, reverting to its pre-So- viet name, the Leningrad region (also known as the Leningrad oblast) retained its Soviet name after the collapse of the USSR. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 PL License (creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/pl/), which permits redistribution, commercial and non- -commercial, provided that the article is properly cited. © The Author(s) 2019. Publisher: Institute of Slavic Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences [Wydawca: Instytut Slawistyki Polskiej Akademii Nauk] Elena Fell Izhorians: A disappearing ethnic group indigenous to the Leningrad region chronicles, where, according to Chistiakov (Чистяков, 2006), “Izhora” people were mentioned as early as 1228.
    [Show full text]
  • The City's Memory: Texts of Preservation and Loss in Imperial St. Petersburg Julie Buckler, Harvard University Petersburg's Im
    The City’s Memory: Texts of Preservation and Loss in Imperial St. Petersburg Julie Buckler, Harvard University Petersburg's imperial-era chroniclers have displayed a persistent, paradoxical obsession with this very young city's history and memory. Count Francesco Algarotti was among the first to exhibit this curious conflation of old and new, although he seems to have been influenced by sentiments generally in the air during the early eighteenth century. Algarotti attributed the dilapidated state of the grand palaces along the banks of the Neva to the haste with which these residences had been constructed by members of the court whom Peter the Great had obliged to move from Moscow to the new capital: [I]t is easy to see that [the palaces] were built out of obedience rather than choice. Their walls are all cracked, quite out of perpendicular, and ready to fall. It has been wittily enough said, that ruins make themselves in other places, but that they were built at Petersburg. Accordingly, it is necessary every moment, in this new capital, to repair the foundations of the buildings, and its inhabitants built incessantly; as well for this reason, as on account of the instability of the ground and of the bad quality of the materials.1 In a similar vein, William Kinglake, who visited Petersburg in the mid-1840s, scornfully advised travelers to admire the city by moonlight, so as to avoid seeing, “with too critical an eye, plaster scaling from the white-washed walls, and frost-cracks rending the painted 1Francesco Algarotti, “Letters from Count Algarotti to Lord Hervey and the Marquis Scipio Maffei,” Letter IV, June 30, 1739.
    [Show full text]
  • Problems and Solutions of Multi Storey Buildings: Okhta Business Center Integration in Historical Center of Saint Petersburg
    MATEC Web of Conferences 5 3, 01026 (2016) DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201653001 26 C Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2016 Problems and solutions of multi storey buildings: Okhta business center integration in historical center of Saint Petersburg Daria Anishchenko1,a, Egor Batkov1, Maria Kukushkina1 and Artem Korsun1 1Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnical University, Polytechnicheskaya st. 29, 195251, St. Petersburg, Russia Abstract. This research is an attempt to make the analysis of possible solutions to the problem of the land where the Okhta Center was to be constructed. The authors studied the case from the historical, practical and cultural sides. In order to find out the current public opinion on this matter two surveys were held both among St Petersburg residents and foreign guests of the city. The main aims of this article were to find the solutions, that would lead to improvement in the cultural and social level of St Petersburg citizens’ life. The possible outcomes of this research are increasing incomes of the city budget, raising the status of the city and the development of Krasnogvardeisky region of St. Petersburg. 1 Introduction The Nowadays the society needs to balance historic, cultural and modern urban aspects of the life of the city. Sometimes it means that every aspect could destroy another just because of the opportunity of the future profit from it. Of course, the profit is not only money matter, but also involves the reputation of the city and region in general, that also could reflect the economic stability of the region and nearby areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Valuation Report PO-17/2015
    Valuation Report PO-17/2015 A portfolio of real estate assets in St. Petersburg and Leningradskaya Oblast', Moscow and Moskovskaya Oblast’, Yekaterinburg, Russia Prepared on behalf of LSR Group OJSC Date of issue: March 17, 2016 Contact details LSR Group OJSC, 15-H, liter Ǩ, Kazanskaya St, St Petersburg, 190031, Russia Ludmila Fradina, Tel. +7 812 3856105, [email protected] Knight Frank Saint-Petersburg ZAO, Liter A, 3B Mayakovskogo St., St Petersburg, 191025, Russia Svetlana Shalaeva, Tel. +7 812 3632222, [email protected] Valuation report Ň A portfolio of real estate assets in St. Petersburg and Leningradskaya Oblast', Moscow and Moskovskaya Oblast’, Yekaterinburg, Russia Ň KF Ref: PO-17/2015 Ň Prepared on behalf of LSR Group OJSC Ň Date of issue: March 17, 2016 Page 1 Executive summary The executive summary below is to be used in conjunction with the valuation report to which it forms part and, is subject to the assumptions, caveats and bases of valuation stated herein. It should not be read in isolation. Location The Properties within the Portfolio of real estate assets to be valued are located in St. Petersburg and Leningradskaya Oblast', Moscow, Yekaterinburg, Russia Description The Subject Property is represented by vacant, partly or completely developed land plots intended for residential and commercial development and commercial office buildings with related land plots. Areas Ɣ Buildings – see the Schedule of Properties below Ɣ Land plots – see the Schedule of Properties below Tenure Ɣ Buildings – see the Schedule of Properties below Ɣ Land plots – see the Schedule of Properties below Tenancies As of the valuation date from the data provided by the Client, the office properties are partially occupied by the short-term leaseholders according to the lease agreements.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Activities of Russian Organization in Relation to the BALTEX Phase II Implementation 1
    Report on the activities of Russian organization in relation to the BALTEX Phase II Implementation 1. Better understanding of the energy and water cycles over the Baltic Sea basin Long-term studies of lakes and rivers ice regime formation in the Russian part of the Baltic Sea basin are being carried out at the State Hydrological Institute. The changes of ice cover duration and maximal ice cover thickness for the last 50 years has been estimated on the basis of statistical methods. The ice cover duration in mid-size rivers within the Russian part of Baltic drainage basin became shorter because of later ice-on and earlier ice-off: - for the period of observation (from 1945 to 2005) became shorter by 30-40 days on the average - during the last 20-25 years became shorter by 3-7 days on the average Volkhov-Volkhov, 1946-2005 R2 = 0,3588 200 150 100 50 0 Ice cover duration, days 1946 1951 1956 1961 1966 1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 Years In all rivers under consideration within the Russian part of Baltic drainage basin a tendency towards decrease of the maximum ice cover thickness was established for the second part of the XXth century. A thinning of the maximum ice cover thickness was -5-10 cm for the period Luga-Kingisep, 1954-2000 R2 = 0,0252 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 ice cover thickness, cm 30 um 20 Shelon-Zapolie, 1945-2005 10 axim M 0 100 4 8 2 6 0 4 8 2 6 0 4 5 5 6 6 97 97 97 98 98 99 99 998 002 80 19 19 19 19 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 Years 60 R2 = 0,0052 40 thickness, cm 20 Maximum ice cover 0 1954 1958 1962 1966 1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 Years Possible features of bottom flow from the Stolp Channel into the Central Baltic were investigated by numerical simulation at the Russian State Hydrometeorological University (RSHU).
    [Show full text]
  • SGGEE Russia Gazetteer 201908.Xlsx
    SGGEE Russia gazetteer © 2019 Dr. Frank Stewner Page 1 of 25 27.08.2021 Menno Location according to the SGGEE guideline of October 2013 North East Village name old Village name today Abdulino (Abdulino), Abdulino, Orenburg, Russia 534125 533900 Абдулино Абдулино Abramfeld (NE in Malchevsko-Polnenskaya), Millerovo, Rostov, Russia 485951 401259 Абрамфельд Мальчевско-Полненская m Abrampolski II (lost), Davlekanovo, Bashkortostan, Russia 541256 545650 Aehrenfeld (Chakalovo), Krasny Kut, Saratov, Russia 504336 470306 Крацкое/Эренфельд Чкалово Aidarowa (Aidrowo), Pskov, Pskov, Russia 563510 300411 Айдарово Айдарово Akimowka (Akimovka), Krasnoshchyokovo, Altai Krai, Russia 513511 823519 Акимовка Акимовка Aksenowo (Aksenovo), Ust-Ishim, Omsk, Russia 574137 713030 Аксеново Аксеново Aktjubinski (Aktyubinski), Aznakayevo, Tatarstan, Russia 544855 524805 Актюбинский Актюбинский Aldan/Nesametny (Aldan), Aldan, Sakha, Russia 583637 1252250 Алдан/Незаметный Алдан Aleksanderhoeh/Aleksandrowka (Nalivnaya), Sovetsky, Saratov, Russia 511611 465220 Александерге/АлександровкаНаливная Aleksanderhoeh/Uralsk (Aleksanrovka), Sovetsky, Saratov, Russia 511558 465112 Александерге Александровка Aleksandertal (lost), Kamyshin, Volgograd, Russia 501952 452332 Александрталь Александровка m Aleksandrofeld/Masajewka (lost), Matveyev-Kurgan, Rostov, Russia 473408 390954 Александрофельд/Мазаевка - Aleksandro-Newskij (Aleksandro-Nevskiy), Andreyevsk, Omsk, Russia 540118 772405 Александро-Невский Александро-Невский Aleksandrotal (Nadezhdino), Koshki, Samara, Russia 540702
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Owners of Small Vessels, Pleasure Craft and Sport Sailboats
    GUIDELINES FOR OWNERS OF SMALL VESSELS, PLEASURE CRAFT AND SPORT SAILBOATS Contents CHAPTER 1. Tourist routes along the waterways of the North-West of Russia. .............. 6 CHAPTER 2. Yacht clubs having guest berths ................................................................ 10 CHAPTER 3. Specifics of navigation in certain areas of waterways ............................... 12 3.1.1. Navigation in the border area of the Russian Federation. ...................................... 12 3.1.2. Pleasure craft navigation on the Saimaa Canal. .................................................... 13 3.1.3. Navigation of small vessels and yachts in Vyborg Bay. ........................................ 14 3.1.4. Navigation of small vessels and yachts the water area of Saint Petersburg. .......... 15 3.1.5. Procedure for entry of vessels to the sea ports Big Port of Saint Petersburg and Passenger Port of Saint Petersburg. ................................................................................ 18 CHAPTER 4. Procedures for customs and border control and customs operations ......... 19 4.1. Regulatory and legal framework. ............................................................................. 19 4.2. Specifics of control operations to check the grounds for passing the state border by Russian and foreign small vessels, sport sailboats and pleasure craft ............................. 22 4.3. Procedure for the passage of ships in the HMCP of the sea port Big Port of Saint Petersburg (terminal for servicing small vessels, sport sailboats
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Article in PDF Format
    E3S Web of Conferences 164, 01015 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf /2020164010 15 TPACEE-2019 Properties of the urban watercourse composition under anthropogenic load Viktor Denisov1*, Ekaterina Bondarenko 1, and Alexander Scherbakov2 1 Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 29, Polytechnic st., St. Petersburg, 195251, Russia 2Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Vtoraya Krasnoarmeiskaya street, 4, Saint Petersburg, 190005, Russia Abstract. The anthropogenic impact on urban rivers is very significant. Industrial enterprises, municipal, and agricultural organizations discharge wastewater directly into the rivers. In the samples of the studied water, certain properties were found. The water in the river is cloudy, brown in color, and in some places has a sharp smell. Extraneous impurities and foam were detected in water. Moreover, various chemicals were found, which are not characteristic to natural waters. The analyzed water is highly polluted as shown by the following chemical indicators, which reported results higher than the Maximum Allowable Concentration: Fe concentration is 24 times higher than standard, Cu is 5 times higher, Mn is 6 times higher, Al is 366 times higher, Hg is 3 times higher, Zn is 4 times higher, NO2 is 2.5 times higher, hydrocarbon pollution is 2.8 times higher, NH4 is 1.9 times higher. Therefore, it is necessary to immediately develop effective methods for monitoring the state of the watercourse, both economic and energetic. To save the sustainable development of the natural system. 1 Introduction Russia is very rich in water resources. It has a huge river network in which watercourses that are 5-8 km long make up 76% of the total number of rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • British Residents in Russia During the Crimean War Simon Dixon
    Allegiance and Betrayal: British Residents in Russia during the Crimean War Simon Dixon This article reveals a previously unsuspected instance of a problem that has troubled most states at some point in their history: the treatment of foreigners in wartime following their transposition from the status of ‘resident alien’ to that of ‘enemy alien’. Debates on the rights of foreign residents, in contra-distinction to those of native citizens, can be traced back to the Athenian city state, where Aristotle himself was a Macedonian resident alien (metic).1 Wars may never have been the only crises to challenge those rights -- food shortages seem most often to have led to the expulsion of foreigners from ancient Rome and it remains uncertain whether it was Aristotle’s foreign status that twice forced him to leave Athens2 -- but, ever since classical times, foreign residents, variously defined, have repeatedly fallen under suspicion when their adopted homelands have come under threat from their native countries. More than 2000 years after Aristotle’s death, the issue remains current thanks partly to the controversial detention of noncitizens of the United States in the aftermath of the attacks of 9/11.3 In studying the period between the ancient world and our own, historians have focused on the widespread introduction of mass internment during the First World War, a policy revived by leading belligerents between 1939 and 1945.4 Issued shortly after the Italian declaration of war in June 1940, Churchill’s notorious instruction to ‘collar the lot!’ is sometimes supposed to have heralded a uniform experience for Italian residents in Britain, most of whom had dual nationality.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment Report of the Interreg 2021-2027 South-East Finland – Russia Programme
    Environmental assessment report of the Interreg 2021-2027 South-East Finland – Russia Programme President _____________________ Mr. Nikolay Matsukov St-Petersburg 2021 Interreg 2021-2027 South-East Finland-Russia programme Environmental report Brukhanov A.U., Matsukov N.N., Vorobyeva E.A., Vasilev E.V., Oblomkova N.S. SPA ISH Version 30 June 2021 2 The Interreg 2021-2027 South-East Finland - Russia Programme is undergoing a strategic environmental assessment (SEA). The SEA procedure includes several phases: determination of the scope of the environmental assessment, preparation of an environmental report, which includes an assessment of risks from the implementation of the program, consultations / public hearings with environmental authorities and other stakeholders on the content of the environmental report, preparation of the SEA report based on the results of consultations / public hearings. One of the main parts of the SEA is the assessment of possible environmental risks and consequences during the implementation of the program. The task of the experts preparing the report is to assess how ecologically important problems for the region are reflected in the preparation of the program and how they will be taken into account in its further implementation. Such an assessment and the final recommendations of the SEA are extremely relevant, as they are taken into account when developing the final version of the program. 3 Content Introduction ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Valuation Report PO-36/2017
    Valuation Report PO-36/2017 A portfolio of real estate assets in Russia (St Petersburg, Moscow, Yekaterinburg) and Germany (Leipzig, Landshut, Munich) Prepared on behalf of LSR Group OJSC Date of issue: March 12, 2018 Contact details LSR Group OJSC, 15-H, liter Ǩ, 36, Kazanskaya St, St Petersburg, 190031, Russia Lyudmila Fradina, Tel. +7 812 3856106, [email protected] Knight Frank Saint-Petersburg AO, Liter A, 3B, Mayakovskogo St., St Petersburg, 191025, Russia Svetlana Shalaeva, Tel. +7 812 3632222, [email protected] Valuation report Ň A portfolio of real estate assets in St. Petersburg and Leningradskaya Oblast', Moscow and Moskovskaya Oblast’, Yekaterinburg, Russia and Leipzig, Landshut and Munich, Germany Ň KF Ref: PO-36/2017 Ň Prepared on behalf of LSR Group OJSC Ň Date of issue: March 12, 2018 Page 1 Executive summary The executive summary below is to be used in conjunction with the valuation report to which it forms part and, is subject to the assumptions, caveats and bases of valuation stated herein. It should not be read in isolation. Location The Properties within the Portfolio of real estate assets to be valued are located in St. Petersburg and Leningradskaya Oblast', Moscow, Yekaterinburg, Russia and in Munich, Leipzig and Landshut, Germany. Description The Subject Property is represented by vacant, partly or completely developed land plots intended for residential and commercial development and commercial office buildings with related land plots. Areas Ɣ Buildings – see the Schedule of Properties below Ɣ Land plots – see the Schedule of Properties below Tenure Ɣ Buildings – see the Schedule of Properties below Ɣ Land plots – see the Schedule of Properties below Tenancies As of the valuation date from the data provided by the Client, the office properties are partially occupied by the short-term leaseholders according to the lease agreements.
    [Show full text]
  • IV (XII) International Botanical Conference of Young Scientists in Saint-Petersburg Nd Th April 22 –28 , 2018
    RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES Komarov Botanical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences Council of Young Scientists of BIN RAS Scientific Educational Center of BIN RAS Russian Botanical Society Saint-Petersburg Mycological Society PROGRAMME of IV (XII) International Botanical Conference of Young Scientists in Saint-Petersburg nd th April 22 –28 , 2018 IV (XII) International Botanical Conference of Young Scientists in Saint-Petersburg April 22nd–28th, 2018 Organizing Committee: Dr. Dmitry Geltman, Director of BIN RAS (Chairman of the Conference); Dr. Sergey Volobuev (Vice-Chairman); Artyom Leostrin (Secretary); Margarita Bondarenko, Dr. Lyudmila Gagarina, Anastasiya Gnilovskaya, Dr. Petr Efimov, Elena Ershova, Anna Fedosova, Dr. Elena Ilina, Yuri Kalugin, Dr. Anton Korablev, Dr. Nina Medvedeva, Dr. Nikolay Nosov, Yanina Pagoda, Dr. Nataliya Petrova, Svetlana Popova, Lyubov Pushkareva, Dr. Katerina Sazanova, Dr. Svetlana Senik, Svetlana Smirnova, Dr. Anna Stepanova, Vera Stepanova, Grigory Tyusov, Dr. Elena Tyutereva, Dr. Roman Ufimov, Dr. Maria Vinogradskaya, Alexandra Volchanskaya, Dr. Olga Voronova Contacts of the Organizing Committee: Komarov Botanical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 197376 Russia, Saint Petersburg, Professor Popov, 2. E-mail: [email protected] www.binran.ru/mol2018/ Dear Participants of the Conference! We are glad to welcome you in the Komarov Botanical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences! GENERAL SCHEDULE OF THE CONFERENCE April 22 April 23 April 24 April 25 April 26 April 27 (Sunday) (Monday)
    [Show full text]