DOCSLIB.ORG

Compiled Public Comments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Compiled Public Comments COMPILED PUBLIC COMMENTS SUBMITTED AT PHASE ONE PUBLIC MEETINGS AND VIA THE PROJECT’S ONLINE PUBLIC COMMENT PORTAL UPDATE: July 19, 2013 Height Master Plan for Washington, DC Phase One Public Outreach Summary July 9, 2013 Phase one public engagement for the Height Master Plan began on March 5, 2013 with a capacity crowd of over 200 people attending the HeighteneDConversations: Impacts of Building Heights in Capital Cities. This NCPC Speaker Series event held at the National Archives featured a panel of international experts who explored the impacts of building heights in capital cities around the world. The session featured remarks from Congressman Darrell Issa, chairman of the House Committee on Oversight & Government Reform. This was concurrent with the launch of the Height Master Plan website, the principal mechanism for outreach and notification. The study- specific website details the study’s approach and includes related study resources, a curated blog, a library of media coverage and thought pieces, and an online public comment portal, in which nearly 100 individuals comments have been submitted from citizens throughout the US. Online comments have ranged from simple, two-sentence observations to submittal of full academic dissertations. The online submissions are viewable at: http://www.ncpc.gov/heightstudy/comments.php NCPC also commenced a digital and social media campaign, generating, monitoring, and engaging with contributors on Facebook and Twitter using the Twitter hashtag #HeightDC. Phase One Public Meeting Series Phase One Public Meeting Series Petworth Library (Ward 4) Monday, May 13 MLK Central Library (Ward 2) Saturday, May 18 National Capital Planning Commission (Ward 2) Tuesday, June 4 Savoy Elementary School (Ward 8) Thursday, June 6 As part of phase one outreach, four public meetings were hosted at locations throughout the city to bring the conversation related to the shape, form and charter of the city directly to the each of the District’s wards. By the end of the phase two public meeting series, all eight of the District’s wards will have been included. Each of the phase one meetings were presented as an open house format: representatives from NCPC and DCOP provided a brief overview of the study and guiding core principles, and then held an open Q&A session with attendees. The public was then invited to visit display board for more in-depth one-on-one conversations with NCPC and DC Office of Planning staff. Each meeting saw an audience of roughly 50-75 people, comprised mainly of DC residents. 2 While public opinions on changes to Washington building heights varied drastically—some public comments staunchly defended the existing skyline while others pushed for development to the magnitude of Manhattan and Dubai—several consistent themes arose at each of the meetings. Comments on Case Studies Attendees commonly questioned the selection of cities represented in the case studies; in particular, issues arose regarding the number of international cities chosen. This was often backed by a comment that as the nation’s capital, Washington, DC should compare itself to domestic cities as opposed to foreign ones. Overall, attendees seemed to need more information on what guided the choice of cities for case studies, and the purpose of the case study analysis—whether it was to model DC’s shape and character after these cities, find cities with similar existing conditions, or simply determine best practices. Comments on Core Principles At the public meetings, presenters, boards, and public comment cards guided much of the discussion towards the study’s three core principles. A general concern was that all three principles looked to the past instead of the future (i.e. they were designed to protect the history of the city rather than accommodate growth). Principle 1: Ensure the prominence of federal landmarks and monuments by preserving their views and setting. While commenters agreed on the symbolic importance of federal landmarks and monuments, there were several mentions that private buildings could not only be added to the skyline without competing with civic structures, but could even frame and enhance desired views or corridors. Principle 2: Maintain the horizontality of the monumental city skyline. Of the three core principles, Principle 2 was by far most controversial. Many respondents took issue with the term “horizontality,” both the emphasis on the concept and the definition of the word itself. A popular criticism was that even with taller buildings, a horizontal skyline was still achievable as long as the height increase was uniform. On the other hand, a few pointed out that DC’s existing skyline was not “horizontal” at all, but rather punctuated by structures such as the Washington Monument, and steeples, and generally following the area’s natural rolling topography. Principle 3: Minimize negative impacts to nationally significant historic resources, including the L’Enfant Plan. The third principle was relatively uncontested—the majority of responses agreed that preserving the L’Enfant Plan was important. This seemed to guide the design of streets and there were a number of questions as the L’Enfant plan prescribed or intended for building height in the future Washington City. Additionally, it was noted that Principle 1 and Principle 3 were similar in objective. Primary Discussion Points Affordability Aside from the principles and case studies, affordability was perhaps the most discussed topic, both during the Q&A sessions, one-on-one conversations with staff at the discussion boards, in the public comment cards, and 3 online. However, there was quite a bit of debate over the relationship between building heights and affordability. There was certainly agreement on the already-high existing prices, but some argued height increases would do nothing to ameliorate the current conditions whereas others said relaxing of height limits was essential for affordability. Density Density, too, was consistently discussed at all four public meetings, although once again attendees were not in agreement on how it would be impacted by height changes. This may have been part of a larger confusion about population growth and real estate, and how building heights played into these issues. The relationship between density, affordability, and height could be clarified in future meetings and outreach. Home Rule Many residents were frustrated that a federal Height Act existed at all, which is to say that even if they did not necessarily support increasing the limit, they felt the city (through the District of Columbia Office of Planning, presumably) should have greater jurisdiction over building heights. There was also the perception that the Congressional interests were mutually exclusive to those of the city and its residents, with no common shared interests. Indeed, a major point of confusion was the scope of public outreach for the study: why is it a national conversation when it should be a matter of home rule? This perspective was not surprising as public meeting attendees were largely local residents and much of their concern was rooted in the desire for neighborhood protection. Conversely, comments received via the online public comment portal reflected a greater acknowledgement of Washington’s shape and form as a significant contributor to Washington’s symbolic role as the nation’s capital. Federal Interest As the conversation was taken into the neighborhoods and online there was, perhaps unsurprisingly, little discussion at the meetings and online specifically regarding the federal interest in building heights; the majority of attendees self-identified as residents, and as such the comments rarely shared a federal stakeholder’s perspective. Additionally, NCPC convened meetings with federal stakeholders both as Facilitated Discussion Groups and individually with leadership and staff of targeted federal agencies. At these sessions a great deal of conversation focused on impacts to future federal security and communications infrastructure, facility operations, mission implications, and historic, cultural and symbolic resources. Overview Residents at all four public meetings and online provided varying perspectives on whether the Height of Buildings Act should be modified or updated; however there was certain agreement that it has thus far played an important role in shaping the city’s character, and a unique character, at that. All phase one public comments provided in person and on the web are compiled below, and will be included as an appendix in the final recommendations and master plan transmitted to Congress. 4 Staff did their best to transcribe all handwritten comments. Originals are available upon request at the offices of the National Capital Planning Commission. 5 MONDAY, MAY 13, 2013 | PETWORTH LIBRARY 6 WORKBOOK COMMENTS J. | Petworth, DC Principle 1: The Capitol, Washington Monument, Lincoln Memorial, and White House should remain prominent. Street level views are most important to me. Height can be increased along 16th Street, NW, Pennsylvania Avenue, North Capitol Street, New York Avenue, and Florida Avenue in a way that the White House and Capitol building, the Washington Monument, and many more historically significant buildings would remain prominent as viewed from the street. Principle 2: Taller buildings can certainly coexist with our skyline. A horizontal skyline means “squat”. Principle 3: Building heights should relate to L’Enfant streets and public space. What else should we be concerned
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Supportive Services Programs in Naturally Occurring Retirement Communities
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation Office of Disability, Aging and Long-Term Care Policy SUPPORTIVE SERVICES PROGRAMS IN NATURALLY OCCURRING RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES November 2004 Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation The Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE) is the principal advisor to the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) on policy development issues, and is responsible for major activities in the areas of legislative and budget development, strategic planning, policy research and evaluation, and economic analysis. ASPE develops or reviews issues from the viewpoint of the Secretary, providing a perspective that is broader in scope than the specific focus of the various operating agencies. ASPE also works closely with the HHS operating divisions. It assists these agencies in developing policies, and planning policy research, evaluation and data collection within broad HHS and administration initiatives. ASPE often serves a coordinating role for crosscutting policy and administrative activities. ASPE plans and conducts evaluations and research--both in-house and through support of projects by external researchers--of current and proposed programs and topics of particular interest to the Secretary, the Administration and the Congress. Office of Disability, Aging and Long-Term Care Policy The Office of Disability, Aging and Long-Term Care Policy (DALTCP), within ASPE, is responsible for the development, coordination, analysis, research and evaluation of HHS policies and programs which support the independence, health and long-term care of persons with disabilities--children, working aging adults, and older persons. DALTCP is also responsible for policy coordination and research to promote the economic and social well-being of the elderly.
    [Show full text]
  • Oakhurst Everyone
    OAKHURST EVERYONE Community Transformation Plan COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATION PLAN 1 OAKHURST NEIGHBORHOOD 2017 CREATED FOR THE 2017 LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT APPLICATION FOR TRINITY WALK, PHASE 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CITY OF DECATUR STAFF Angela Threadgill Lyn Menne Lee Ann Harvey Planning Director Executive Director Lifelong Community Coordinator City of Decatur Decatur Development Authority City of Decatur TRANSFORMATION PARTNERS Doug Faust David Dude Jolando Crane Executive Director Superintendent Senior Service Planner Decatur Housing Authority City Schools of Decatur MARTA CONSULTANT TEAM Jesse Clark Phoebe Mayor Moki Macias President Project Manager Principal Clark Property Consulting Clark Property Consulting Participant Consulting May 25, 2017 TABLE CONTENTS I. Introduction...............................................................................1 Trinity Walk Phase III Project Summary 3 Neighborhood Overview 7 Neighborhood Resources Assessment 17 II. Previous Studies.......................................................................21 Better Together Community Action Plan (2015) 21 Strategic Plan (2010) 24 Affordable Housing Study (2008) 27 III. Community Based Developer..................................................31 Community Partnerships 33 IV. Public & Private Engagement.................................................37 V. Transformation Plan..................................................................47 Plan Strategy 47 VI. Community Investment...........................................................63 VII.
    [Show full text]
  • 7350 NBM Blueprnts/REV
    MESSAGE FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Building in the Aftermath N AUGUST 29, HURRICANE KATRINA dialogue that can inform the processes by made landfall along the Gulf Coast of which professionals of all stripes will work Othe United States, and literally changed in unison to repair, restore, and, where the shape of our country. The change was not necessary, rebuild the communities and just geographical, but also economic, social, landscapes that have suffered unfathomable and emotional. As weeks have passed since destruction. the storm struck, and yet another fearsome I am sure that I speak for my hurricane, Rita, wreaked further damage colleagues in these cooperating agencies and on the same region, Americans have begun organizations when I say that we believe to come to terms with the human tragedy, good design and planning can not only lead and are now contemplating the daunting the affected region down the road to recov- question of what these events mean for the ery, but also help prevent—or at least miti- Chase W. Rynd future of communities both within the gate—similar catastrophes in the future. affected area and elsewhere. We hope to summon that legendary In the wake of the terrorist American ingenuity to overcome the physi- attacks on New York and Washington cal, political, and other hurdles that may in 2001, the National Building Museum stand in the way of meaningful recovery. initiated a series of public education pro- It seems self-evident to us that grams collectively titled Building in the the fundamental culture and urban char- Aftermath, conceived to help building and acter of New Orleans, one of the world’s design professionals, as well as the general great cities, must be preserved, revitalized, public, sort out the implications of those and protected.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning from Gated High-Rise Living. the Case Study of Changsha
    Heaven Palace? Learning From Gated High-rise Living. The Case Study of Changsha Master Thesis 06/05/2014 Xiang Ding Nordic Program Sustainable Urban Transition Aalto University. School of Arts, Design and Architecture KTH University. School of Architecture and Built Environment Heaven Palace? Learning From Gated High-rise Living. The Case Study of Changsha Master Thesis 06/05/2014 Xiang Ding Nordic Program Sustainable Urban Transition Aalto University. School of Arts, Design and Architecture KTH University. School of Architecture and Built Environment © Aalto University, School of Arts, Design and Architecture & KTH University/ Xiang Ding / This publication has been produced during my scholarship period at Aalto University and KTH University. This thesis was produced at the Nordic Master Programme in Sustainable Urban Transitions for the Urban Laboratory II Master studio, A-36.3701 (5-10 cr). Research project: “ Learning From Gated High-rise Living. The Case Study of Changsha” Supervisor: Professor Kimmo Lapinitie from Aalto University / Professor Peter Brokking from KTH University. Course staff: Professor Kimmo Lapintie Post doc researcher Mina di Marino Architect Hossam Hewidy Dr Architect Helena Teräväinen Aalto University, Espoo, Finland 2014 2 Contents Contents List of Figures and Tables 4-7 Abstract 8 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Gated Communities 10 1.2 High-rise Living 11 1.3 Residents’ Daily Lives 12 1.4 Learning From Nordic Cities 14 1.5 Research Design 16 Chapter 2 Context of China 2.1 Context of Ancient China 18 2.2 Context
    [Show full text]
  • Moondance Homes — Crescent Model — Moondance Homes Crescent Model Moondance Homes Crescent Model
    MOONDANCE HOMES — CRESCENT MODEL — MOONDANCE HOMES CRESCENT MODEL MOONDANCE HOMES CRESCENT MODEL The builder of Moondance Homes, Ironwood Resort Development, is a boutique real estate development firm specializing in luxury residential and resort properties throughout the Rocky Mountain west. Each project blends the best of the modern world with a timeless aesthetic —ensuring that every home fulfills the desires of buyers for today, and for their grandchildren in the future. Designed by Otto/Walker Architects, this limited collection of only 20 mountain BEDROOM 2 KITCHEN contemporary homes is centrally located within the private Tuhaye neighborhood between 15’ x 12’ LIVING ROOM 15’ x 14’ PANTRY BUNK 20’ x 17’ the 7th, 8th and 9th holes of the Mark O’Meara-designed Signature Championship ROOM 9’ x 16’ golf course. Encircling the 3.4-acre Moondance Park, the neighborhood is conveniently FAMILY ROOM situated within walking distance of the clubhouse complex and community trail system. 17’ x 16’ LAUNDRY GARAGE MECH 12’ x 20’ BALCONY DINING ROOM • Approximately 3,400 Finished SF 15’ x 13’ WIC 9’ x 17’ • 4 bedrooms, 4.5 bathrooms FOYER • Full 2-car garage with optional addition POWDER GARAGE 23’ x 21’ of 3rd-car or Golf Cart Garage WIC available on most homesites COVERED PATIO OFFICE 17’ x 13’ 11’x11’ WIC GUEST MASTER 15’ x 14’ BEDROOM 2 KITCHEN LIVING ROOM PANTRY GUEST BATH 15’ x 12’ 15’ x 14’ MASTER SUITE BUNK 20’ x 17’ 15’ x 15’ ROOM MASTER 9’ x 16’ BATH FAMILY ROOM 17’ x 16’ LAUNDRY GARAGE MECH 12’ x 20’ BALCONY DINING ROOM 15’ x 13’ WIC 9’ x 17’ Main Level FOYER POWDER GARAGE 23’ x 21’ WIC UPPER LEVEL MAIN LEVEL COVERED PATIO OFFICE 17’ x 13’ 11’x11’ WIC GUEST MASTER 15’ x 14’ AREA CALCULATIONS GUEST BATH MASTER SUITE Upper Level 15’ x 15’ Main Heated/Livable: 1,988 SF MASTER Upper Heated/Livable: 1,932 SF BATH Total Heated/Livable: 3,380 SF Garage: 790 SF Mech.
    [Show full text]
  • Dc Homeowners' Property Taxes Remain Lowest in The
    An Affiliate of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities 820 First Street NE, Suite 460 Washington, DC 20002 (202) 408-1080 Fax (202) 408-8173 www.dcfpi.org February 27, 2009 DC HOMEOWNERS’ PROPERTY TAXES REMAIN LOWEST IN THE REGION By Katie Kerstetter This week, District homeowners will receive their assessments for 2010 and their property tax bills for 2009. The new assessments are expected to decline modestly, after increasing significantly over the past several years. The new assessments won’t impact homeowners’ tax bills until next year, because this year’s bills are based on last year’s assessments. Yet even though 2009’s tax bills are based on a period when average assessments were rising, this analysis shows that property tax bills have decreased or risen only moderately for many homeowners in recent years. DC homeowners continue to enjoy the lowest average property tax bills in the region, largely due to property tax relief policies implemented in recent years. These policies include a Homestead Deduction1 increase from $30,000 to $67,500; a 10 percent cap on annual increases in taxable assessments; and an 11-cent property tax rate cut. The District also adopted a “calculated rate” provision that decreases the tax rate if property tax collections reach a certain target. As a result of these measures, most DC homeowners have seen their tax bills fall — or increase only modestly — over the past four years. In 2008, DC homeowners paid lower property taxes on average than homeowners in surrounding counties. Among homes with an average sales price of $500,000, DC homeowners paid an average tax of $2,725, compared to $3,504 in Montgomery County, $4,752 in PG County, and over $4,400 in Arlington and Fairfax counties.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Housing Element February, 2014
    CITY OF LAGUNA WOODS 2014 –2021 HOUSING ELEMENT FEBRUARY, 2014 City of Laguna Woods 2014-2021 Housing Element City of Laguna Woods 24264 El Toro Road Laguna Woods, CA 92637 February 2014 HOUSING ELEMENT I. Introduction ......................................................................................................1 Purpose.............................................................................................................1 Changing State Legislation ..............................................................................3 City of Laguna Woods .....................................................................................4 Regional Housing Needs Assessment ............................................................. 5 Housing Element Content ................................................................................5 Policy Document ........................................................................................5 Background Document ...............................................................................6 Public Participation ....................................................................................7 II. Housing Plan ..................................................................................................10 Objectives, Policies, and Programs ...............................................................10 III. Housing Needs Assessment ...........................................................................18 Data Sources ..................................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Dignity by Design
    Dignity by Design Human Rights and the Built Environment Lifecycle Dignity by Design Human Rights and the Built Environment Lifecycle Cite as: Institute for Human Rights and Business, “Dignity by Design: Human Rights and the Built Environment Lifecycle” (July 2019), at: https://www.ihrb.org/focus-areas/built- environment/report-dignity-by-design-human-rights-and-the-built-environment-lifecycle About this paper: This is the latest in a series of occasional papers by the Institute for Human Rights and Business (IHRB). Papers in this series provide independent analysis and policy recommendations concerning timely subjects on the business and human rights agenda from the perspective of IHRB staff members and external experts. The report provides mapping, scoping and framing of key issues, as a platform for a collaborative programme to advance human rights and dignity throughout the built environment lifecycle. The programme’s founding partners are IHRB, Raoul Wallenberg Institute of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law, the Australian Human Rights Institute at the University of New South Wales, and Rafto Foundation for Human Rights. The report highlights human rights issues across the built environment lifecycle – from land acquisition through to demolition and re-use – and makes initial recommendations for action. It builds on IHRB’s existing work on migrant workers in the construction industry, and on recent conversations with architects. Both these sectors have emphasized the need to move towards a whole lifecycle approach to human rights and dignity in the built environment, and greater interaction on human rights between the different actors across the lifecycle. The report also builds on IHRB’s work on the lifecycle of mega-sporting events, which evolved from its 2012 inception to the 2018 launch of the independent Centre for Sport and Human Rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Ramapo Looking Forward: Gated Communities, Covenants, and Concerns
    Ramapo Looking Forward: Gated Communities, Covenants, and Concerns David L. Callies* Paula A. Franzese** Heidi Kai Gutht IN 1972, WHEN THE NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS decided Golden v. Planning Board of Town of Ramapo,I local and state government regulations largely determined the shape and form of community growth and development, local zoning ordinances controlled the use of land, and local and development regulations, mainly in the form of subdivision regulations, controlled the development itself, indeed, it was the merging of the two in the landmark Ramapo ordinance2 that made Ramapo famous. No longer. Private land use controls in the form of the ubiquitous conditions, covenants and restrictions (CC&Rs) increasingly control the form, if not the pace, of development. Attached for decades to the plat of subdivision filed with local government authorities for public subdivision approval,3 CC&Rs form the basis for the land use con- trols-indeed governance-of nearly all common interest communi- ties, whose numbers grow exponentially with each passing year.4 This article sketches the outlines of such communities, then concentrates on their most controversial mutation: the gated community, its problems and its opportunities. It concludes with the observation that such a government-like entity, mimicking as it does so many aspects of local government, needs to be subject to many of the same rules as local *Benjamin A. Kudo Professor of Law, William S. Richardson School of Law, University of Hawaii. LL.M., Nottingham University; J.D., University of Michigan; A.B., DePauw University. An altered version of this article will appear in CIUDAD Y TERRITORIOI for which it was first solicited in early 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Gated Communities in Sydney: a Search for Security
    THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES FACULTY OF THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT Gated communities in Sydney: A search for security DANA QUINTAL Bachelor of Town Planning Thesis November 2006 Gated communities in Sydney: A search for security CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES vi LIST OF TABLES iv ABSTRACT 1 CHAPTER ONE - INTRODUCTION 2 1.1 CONTEXT OF STUDY 2 1.2 PROBLEM STATEMENT 3 1.3 THESIS OBJECTIVES 4 1.4 RELATIONSHIP TO PLANNING 4 1.5 OUTLINE OF CHAPTERS 5 1.6 CHAPTER SUMMARY 5 CHAPTER TWO - METHODOLOGY 6 2.1 LITERATURE REVIEW 6 2.2 CASE STUDIES 6 2.3 RESEARCH APPROACH 7 Resident interviews 8 Development and real estate industry interviews 9 2.4 OBSERVATION 9 2.5 ETHICS APPROVAL 10 2.6 CHAPTER SUMMARY 10 CHAPTER THREE - INTRODUCTION TO GATED COMMUNITIES 11 3.1 INTRODUCING GATED COMMUNITIES 11 3.2 DEFINING GATED COMMUNITIES 12 3.3 THE HISTORY OF GATING AND GATED COMMUNITIES 13 3.4 PREVALENCE OF GATED COMMUNITIES 15 3.5 MOTIVATIONS FOR LIVING IN GATED COMMUNITIES 17 Desire for security and fear of crime 18 Protection of the private sphere 18 Predictability and property values 19 Search for community 19 3.6 CRITICISMS OF GATED COMMUNITIES 20 Exclusion and homogeneity 20 Reduction in street connectivity 21 Crime and fear of crime 21 3.7 BENEFITS OF GATED COMMUNITIES 21 Sense of community 22 Reduced pressure on local government 22 i Gated communities in Sydney: A search for security 3.8 CHAPTER SUMMARY 22 CHAPTER FOUR - GATED COMMUNITIES IN AUSTRALIA 23 4.1 GATED COMMUNITIES IN AUSTRALIA 23 Australian studies of gated communities 24 4.2 GATED COMMUNITIES IN
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Prosperity Strategy a Five-Year Economic Development Strategic Plan for North Iowa
    April 2018 REGIONAL PROSPERITY STRATEGY A FIVE-YEAR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN FOR NORTH IOWA Working together to improve the lives of all North Iowans. VISION NORTH IOWA REGIONAL PROSPERITY STRATEGY ACKNOWLEDGMENTS TIP Strategies would like to thank the many individuals and organizations who contributed to the development of the Vision North Iowa Economic Development Strategic Plan. Your insight and expertise helped us build a better understanding of the North Iowa region’s assets and opportunities. We are especially grateful to the leadership of the Clear Lake Area Chamber of Commerce, Mason City Chamber of Commerce, and North Iowa Corridor EDC for their partnership, oversight, and investment in this important project. And a special thank you to the project steering committee and key stakeholders for devoting their time and input throughout the planning process. KEY PARTNER ORGANIZATIONS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE • Cerro Gordo County • Robin Anderson, Mason City Chamber of Commerce • City of Clear Lake • Tim Coffey, Clear Lake Area Chamber of Commerce • City of Mason City • Chad Schreck, North Iowa Corridor EDC • Clear Lake Chamber of Commerce KEY STAKEHOLDERS • Clear Lake Tourism • Mayor Eric Bookmeyer, City of Mason City • North Iowa Corridor EDC • Mayor Pro Tem Travis Hickey, City of Mason City • Iowa Works • Mayor Nelson Crabb, City of Clear Lake • John Pappajohn Entrepreneurial Center • Mayor Pro Tem Mike Callanan, City of Clear Lake • Mason City Chamber of Commerce • Mayor Bill Schickel, City of Mason City • North Iowa Area
    [Show full text]
  • Residential Community Associations: Private Governments in the Intergovernmental System?
    Members of the Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (May 1989) Private Citizens Daniel J. Elazar, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Robert B. Hawkins, Jr., Chrrirmnn, San Francisco, California Vacancy Members of the U.S. Senate Dave Durenberger, Minnesota Carl Levin, Michigan Charles S. Robb, Virginia Members of the U.S. House of Representatives Sander Levin, Michigan Larkin Smith, Mississippi Ted Weiss, New York Officers of the Executive Branch, U.S. Government Richard L. Thornburgh, Attorney General Vacancy Vacancy Governors John Ashcroft, Missouri George A. Sinner, North Dakota Vacancy Vacancy Mayors Donald M. Fraser, Minneapolis, Minnesota William H. Hudnut, 111, Indianapolis, Indiana Robert M. Isaac, Colorado Springs, Colorado Vacancy Members of State Legislatures John T. Bragg, Deputy Speaker, Tennessee House of Representatives David E. Nething, North Dakota Senate Ted Strickland, Colorado Senate Elected County Oficials Harvey Ruvin, Dade County, Florida, County Commission Sandra Smoley, Sacramento County, California, Board of Supervisors James J. Snyder, Cattaraugus County, New York, County Legislature Residential Community Associations: Private Governments in the Intergovernmental System? With Papers from a Policy Conference Sponsored by the U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations Preface I This policy report is one in a series of publica- tions from a Commission project on "Rethinking Lo- cal Self-Government in a Federal System." Already published are The Organization ofLocul Public Econo- mies (1987),
    [Show full text]