DOCSLIB.ORG

Online EGP Council, 2-6 December 2020 Relating to the EGP Statutes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Online EGP Council, 2-6 December 2020 Relating to the EGP Statutes Online EGP Council, 2-6 December 2020 Relating to the EGP Statutes The EGP Committee proposes three votes relating to the EGP Statutes: 1. For adoption: exception to Art 6.3.1 in the EGP Statutes “6.3.1 The Council is the highest decision-making body of the European Green Party. It is convened by the Committee and must meet at least once a year in person. Council meetings may be held in person or by telecommunication means under conditions laid down in the Rule Book.” The EGP Committee proposes to keep the text of article 6.3.1. as is, but asks the Council delegates to legitimize the 32nd EGP Council by adopting the exception not to hold a Council in person in 2020. This, in view of the extraordinary circumstances caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. 2. For adoption: change of legal seat of the European Green Party The EGP office has been in rue Wiertz 31 since the end of 2004. In need for more office space for the enlarged EGP staff, the Committee chose not to prolong the rental contract which ended on 31 July 2020, and instead decided to move the EGP headquarters to rue du Taciturne 34, 1000 Brussels. The actual move happened right after the Corona lockdown was lifted, early May. Therefore, the Committee presents the following change to the EGP Statutes: Nº Nº Current text Proposed change – new text Article The seat of the European Green The seat of the European Green Party is situated at rue du 1. 2.4 Party is situated at rue Wiertz 31, in Taciturne 34, in 1000 Brussels, 1050 Brussels, Belgium. Belgium. 3. For adoption: Updated EGP Membership List – Annex B (EGP Statutes, p. 23-25) At each EGP Council, the Committee presents the most updated membership list of the EGP for adoption. The EGP Membership List is regularly requested by the DG Finances in the European Parliament and the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations. Changes since 13 June 2020: - List of Full EU Members: Malta, Alternattiva Demokratika, the Green Party merged with Partit Demokratiku (PD) and is now called “AD + PD”. AD + PD adopted the statutes of AD and party leader Carmel Cacopardo remains in that position. - List of Special Members Two more MEPs signed up for individual or direct membership with the EGP: o Claude Gruffat, Ouverture/EELV, France o Silwia Spurek, Independent, Poland 1 Online EGP Council, 2-6 December 2020 Relating to the EGP Statutes Annex B Statutes EGP Membership List for adoption at the EGP Online Council, 2-6 December 2020 List of the Full EU Members of the EGP – 6 December 2020 Country Party Status Austria Die Grünen Full Member since 1993 Belgium Ecolo Full Member since 1993 Belgium Groen Full Member since 1993 Bulgaria Zeleno Dvizheniye / Green Movement Full Member since 2013 Cyprus Movement of Ecologists — Citizens' Cooperation Full Member since 1998 Czech Republic Zelení Full Member since 1997 Denmark Socialistisk Folkeparti / SF Full Member since 2014 Estonia Eestimaa Rohelised Full Member since 1993 Finland Vihreät - De Gröna Full Member since 1993 France Europe Ecologie - Les Verts / EELV Full Member since 1993 Germany Bündnis 90/Die Grünen Full Member since 1993 Greece Oikologoi-Prasinoi / Ecologist Greens Full Member since 1994 Hungary Lehet Más a Politika / LMP Full Member since 2011 Ireland Irish Green Party - Comhaontas Glas Full Member since 1993 Italy Federazione dei Verdi Full Member since 1993 Italy Verdi-Grüne-Vërc South Tyrol Full Member since Nov 2019 Luxembourg déi gréng Full Member since 1993 Malta AD + PD Full Member since 1993 Netherlands GroenLinks Full Member since 1993 Poland Partia Zieloni Full Member since 2005 Portugal Partido Ecologista – Os Verdes Full Member since 1993 Romania Partidul Verde Full Member since 1999 Slovenia SMS Zeleni Evrope Full Member since 2006 Spain Esquerra Verda Full Member since 2006 Spain EQUO Full Member since 2016 Sweden Miljöpartiet de gröna Full Member since 1993 List of the Full NON-EU Members of the EGP – 6 December 2020 Country Party Status Albania Partia e Gjelber Full Member since 2008 Andorra Verds D'Andorra Full Member since 2010 Georgia Sakartvelo's mtsvaneta partia Full Member since 1993 North Demokratska Obnova na Makedonija / DOM Full Member since 2017 Macedonia Moldova Partidul Verde Ecologist Full Member since 2008 Norway Miljøpartiet De Grønne Full Member since 1993 Switzerland Grüne / Les Verts / I Verdi Full Member since 1993 Ukraine Partija Zelenykh Ukrainy / PZU Full Member since 1993 United Kingdom Green Party of England and Wales Full Member since 1993 United Kingdom Scottish Green Party Full Member since 1994 2 Online EGP Council, 2-6 December 2020 Relating to the EGP Statutes List of NON-EU Associate Members – 6 December 2020 Country Party Status Azerbaijan Azərbaycan Yaşıllar Partiyası Associate member since November 2012 Belarus Bielaruskaja Partyja "Zialonye" Associate member since May 2013 Russia Зеленая Россия / Green Russia Associate member since May 2013 List of EU Candidate Members – 6 December 2020 Country Party Status Croatia ORaH Candidate Member since November 2014 List of NON-EU Candidate Members – 6 December 2020 Country Party Status Montenegro Građanski Pokret URA Candidate Member since June 2020 Turkey Yeşiller ve Sol Gelecek Partisi Candidate Member since November 2012 List of Special Members (57) – 6 December 2020 AUT – Die Grünen, AUSTRIA (3) Sarah WIENER (indirect) Monika VANA (indirect) Thomas WAITZ (indirect) BEL – Groen and ECOLO, BELGIUM (3) Philippe LAMBERTS, ECOLO (indirect) Saskia BRICMONT, ECOLO (indirect Petra De Sutter, Groen (indirect) DEU – Bündnis 90/Die Grünen, GERMANY (21) Ska KELLER (indirect) Sven GIEGOLD (indirect) Terry REINTKE (indirect) Reinhard BÜTIKOFER (indirect) Hannah NEUMANN (indirect) Martin HÄUSLING (indirect) Anna CAVAZZINI (indirect) Erik MARQUARDT (indirect) Katrin LANGENSIEPEN (indirect) Romeo FRANZ (indirect) Jutta PAULUS (indirect) Sergey LAGODINSKY (indirect) Henrike HAHN (indirect) Michael BLOSS (indirect) Anna DEPARNAY-GRUNENBERG (indirect) Rasmus ANDRESEN (indirect) Alexandra GEESE (indirect) Niklas NIENASS (indirect) Viola VON CRAMON (indirect) Daniel FREUND (indirect) 3 Online EGP Council, 2-6 December 2020 Relating to the EGP Statutes Pierette HERZBERGER-FOFANA (indirect) DNK – SF – DENMARK (2) Margrete AUKEN (indirect) Kira-Marie PETER HANSEN (indirect) ESP – Esquerra Verda - Verds - SPAIN (1) Ernest URTASUN (direct) FIN - Vihreät – De Gröna - FINLAND (3) Ville NIINISTÖ (indirect) Heidi HAUTALA (indirect) Alviina ALAMETSÄ (indirect) FRA – Europe Ecologie - Les Verts (EELV) - FRANCE (8) Yannick JADOT (indirect) Michèle RIVASI (indirect) Damien CARÊME (indirect) Marie TOUSSAINT (indirect) David CORMAND (indirect) Karima DELLI (indirect) Mounir SATOURI (indirect) Gwendoline DELBOS-CORFIELD (indirect) FRA – Others – FRANCE (4) Caroline ROOSE, Alliance Européenne Indépendente (AEI) (direct) Salima YENBOU, Alliance Européenne Indépendente (AEI) (direct) Benoît BITEAU, Ouverture (direct) Claude Gruffat, Ouverture (direct) IRL – The Irish Green Party – IRELAND (2) Ciarán CUFFE (indirect) Grace O’Sullivan (indirect) LTU – Greens and Farmers Union - LITHUANIA (1) Bronis ROPE (direct) LUX - Déi gréng - LUXEMBOURG (1) Tilly METZ (indirect) NLD – GroenLinks – NETHERLANDS (3) Bas EICKHOUT (indirect) Tineke STRIK (indirect) Kim VAN SPARRENTAK (indirect) POL – independent – POLAND (1) Sylwia SPUREK (direct) PRT – Independent – PORTUGAL (1) Francicso GUERREIRO (direct) SWE - miljöpartiet de gröna - SWEDEN (3) Alice BAH KUHNKE (indirect) Pär HOLMGREN (indirect) Jakop DALUNDE (indirect) 4 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Letter to the Commission Regarding Printers Voluntary Agreement
    Brussels, Wednesday 26th of May To: Mr Virginijus Sinkevičius, European Commissioner for Environment, Oceans and Fisheries Mr Thierry Breton, European Commissioner for the Internal Market Mr Frans Timmermans, European Commission Executive Vice-President for the European Green Deal We urge the European Commission to keep its promises and propose a regulatory measure addressing the durability and repairability of printers as well as the reusability of cartridges as part of the forthcoming Circular Electronics Initiative. And we ask that the Commission rejects the proposed voluntary agreement drafted by manufacturers. The Commission's flagship Circular Economy Action Plan, adopted in March 2020, has set out to address the entire life cycle of products and tackle their premature obsolescence notably by promoting the right to repair for ICT products. In addition to mobile phones, laptops and tablets, the Plan has rightfully identified printers as a particularly wasteful product category, and has included a commitment to tackle them by means of a dedicated regulatory instrument “unless the sector reaches an ambitious voluntary agreement” by September 2020. Nearly one year later, the discussions on the voluntary agreement have not yielded any tangible results. Voluntary approaches clearly do not work. We need strong regulatory action now. We are extremely concerned by this situation. Not only because of the negative impacts of short-lived printers on the environment and on consumers but also because we are witnessing promises made being walked back on. Printers are one of the most iconic examples of premature obsolescence. Our analysis of printers in use today suggests that over 80% of them have been in use for less than 3 years, and only about 4% have been in use for 5 years or longer.
    [Show full text]
  • To the President of the European Commission Mrs. Ursula Von Der Leyen, Rue De La Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels
    To the President of the European Commission Mrs. Ursula von der Leyen, Rue de la Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels To the Executive Vice-President of the European Commission Mr. Vladis Dombrovskis Rue de la Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels Brussels, 22 October 2020, Subject: the EU must impose an import ban on Chinese companies using forced labour Dear President von der Leyen, Dear Vice-President Dombrovskis, For years, the Chinese regime has been detaining millions of human beings in camps, just because they were born Uyghurs. For years, Europe and the world have been witnessing a crime against humanity without opposing any resistance to it. In recent months, several studies have reported the use of Uyghur forced labour for the benefit of major European companies. Indeed, many Chinese factories, directly supplying EU brands exploit the Uyghurs and benefit from their forced labour. Facing this abjection, Europe must act to protect the lives and fundamental rights of Uyghurs. The EU should use its trade and market power to safeguards the founding principles enrichened in our Treaties and guiding our external policies. As the US did lately through an imports ban passed almost unanimously in the US House of Representatives, Europe urgently needs to establish a blacklist of Chinese companies implicated in Uyghur forced labour. We look forward to your response. Yours sincerely, 1. Raphaël Glucksmann, S&D 2. Dietmar Köster, S&D 3. Francisco Guerreiro, Greens 4. Sylvie Guillaume, S&D 5. Aurore Lalucq, S&D 6. Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Renew 7. Anna Cavazzini, Greens 8. Nora Mebarek, S&D 9.
    [Show full text]
  • We Need a European Response to Fight Against the Consequences of the COVID-19
    © Photo European Parliament en Publication | 16.03.2020 We need a European response to fight against the consequences of the COVID-19 Open letter to the Eurogroup Dear members of the Eurogroup, The Coronavirus pandemic has created a state of emergency in Europe, which needs a coordinated and ambitious response. According to the latest forecast by the European Commission, the European economy is expected to rapidly fall into recession that may be extremely severe if the policy response is not appropriate. There is no time to waste if we want avoid a repeating the mistakes made in the context global financial and subsequent euro area crises. The EU economy never fully recovered from the previous meltdown and was already in a weak position to meet the current challenges. A certain number of required targeted measures have already been announced by the European Central Bank, the Commission and several Member States to mitigate the economic impact of the outbreak. The ECB decided to increment its substantial monetary policy stimulus already in place. The Commission will implement the flexibilities foreseen in the Stability and Growth Pact and reorient unspent EU funds. Most Member States are in the process of adopting policies providing financial support and tax deferrals to companies. Moreover,the Single Supervisory Mechanism with the support of the European Banking Authority will provide temporary capital and operational relief to the banks. It is also worrying that instead of integrating economic shocks such as an epidemic outbreak in banking stress, such tests are postponed sine die. Having all these considerations in mind and recognising that the already announced measures represent steps in the good direction, the response cannot simply be based on policies adopted by Member States with supportive measures at the EU level, even if these are meaningful.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Parties and Elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Green Par Elections
    Chapter 1 Green Parties and Elections, 1979–2019 Green parties and elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Wolfgang Rüdig Introduction The history of green parties in Europe is closely intertwined with the history of elections to the European Parliament. When the first direct elections to the European Parliament took place in June 1979, the development of green parties in Europe was still in its infancy. Only in Belgium and the UK had green parties been formed that took part in these elections; but ecological lists, which were the pre- decessors of green parties, competed in other countries. Despite not winning representation, the German Greens were particularly influ- enced by the 1979 European elections. Five years later, most partic- ipating countries had seen the formation of national green parties, and the first Green MEPs from Belgium and Germany were elected. Green parties have been represented continuously in the European Parliament since 1984. Subsequent years saw Greens from many other countries joining their Belgian and German colleagues in the Euro- pean Parliament. European elections continued to be important for party formation in new EU member countries. In the 1980s it was the South European countries (Greece, Portugal and Spain), following 4 GREENS FOR A BETTER EUROPE their successful transition to democracies, that became members. Green parties did not have a strong role in their national party systems, and European elections became an important focus for party develop- ment. In the 1990s it was the turn of Austria, Finland and Sweden to join; green parties were already well established in all three nations and provided ongoing support for Greens in the European Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
    [Show full text]
  • 16.10.2020 A8-0200/1343 Amendment 1343 Bas Eickhout, Martin Häusling, Tilly Metz, Francisco Guerreiro, Ernest Urtasun, Caroline
    16.10.2020 A8-0200/1343 Amendment 1343 Bas Eickhout, Martin Häusling, Tilly Metz, Francisco Guerreiro, Ernest Urtasun, Caroline Roose, Thomas Waitz, Yannick Jadot, Marie Toussaint, Sylwia Spurek, Gwendoline Delbos-Corfield, Pär Holmgren, Alice Kuhnke, Jakop G. Dalunde, Manuela Ripa, Saskia Bricmont, Sarah Wiener, Jordi Solé, Diana Riba i Giner on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Michal Wiezik, Marisa Matias, José Gusmão, Eugenia Rodríguez Palop, Silvia Modig, Anja Hazekamp, Eleonora Evi, Ignazio Corrao, Piernicola Pedicini, Rosa D'Amato, Mick Wallace, Clare Daly, Mario Furore, Younous Omarjee, Manuel Bompard Report A8-0200/2019 Peter Jahr Common agricultural policy - support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States and financed by the EAGF and by the EAFRD (COM(2018)0392 – C8-0248/2018 – 2018/0216(COD)) Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new) Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (f a) 'concentrated animal feeding operation' means a livestock holding rearing animals at a density beyond that permitted by the area and natural resources, or carrying capacity, of the holding, or in the case of cattle and ruminants, where the animals are without access to grazing or without the appropriate amount of supporting forage hectares to support pasture- or grassland- based grazing or foraging; Or. en AM\P8_AMA(2019)0200(1343-1352)EN.docx PE658.380v01-00 EN United in diversityEN 16.10.2020 A8-0200/1344 Amendment 1344 Bas Eickhout, Martin Häusling, Tilly Metz, Francisco Guerreiro, Ernest Urtasun, Caroline Roose, Thomas Waitz, Yannick Jadot, Marie Toussaint, Sylwia Spurek, Gwendoline Delbos-Corfield, Pär Holmgren, Alice Kuhnke, Jakop G.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Choose a Political Party
    FastFACTS How to Choose a Political Party When you sign up to vote, you can join a political party. A political party is a group of people who share the same ideas about how the government should be run and what it should do. They work together to win elections. You can also choose not to join any of the political parties and still be a voter. There is no cost to join a party. How to choose a political party: • Choose a political party that has the same general views you do. For example, some political parties think that government should No Party Preference do more for people. Others feel that government should make it If you do not want to register easier for people to do things for themselves. with a political party (you • If you do not want to join a political party, mark that box on your want to be “independent” voter registration form. This is called “no party preference.” Know of any political party), mark that if you do, you may have limited choices for party candidates in “I do not want to register Presidential primary elections. with a political party” on the registration form. In • You can change your political party registration at any time. Just fill California, you can still out a new voter registration form and check a different party box. vote for any candidate in The deadline to change your party is 15 days before the election. a primary election, except If you are not registered with a political party and for Presidential candidates.
    [Show full text]
  • Members of the European Parliament Mr Janusz
    Members of the European Parliament Mr Janusz Wojciechowski Commissioner for Agriculture European Commission Rue de la Loi 200 B-1049 Bruxelles Mr Virginijus Sinkevičius Commissioner for Environment, Oceans and Fisheries European Commission Rue de la Loi 200 B-1049 Bruxelles Brussels, 11 November 2020 Subject: Deforestation and illegal logging of Romania’s primary forests Dear Commissioners, we, the undersigned Members of the European Parliament, are addressing you to express our deep concerns about massive violations of the protection of Natura 2000 areas, primary and ancient forests and UNESCO World Heritage Sites in Romania. In Romania, deforestation caused by illegal logging is continuing on an alarming scale. It threatens the last and irreplaceable primary forests in the EU, which are more crucial than ever in the fight against climate change and for the preservation of biodiversity. According to expert estimates, up to two thirds of the EU’s remaining primary forests are located in Romania. Largely untouched areas in the Romanian Carpathian Mountains and the Făgăraș Mountains have survived until today – a European if not global heritage of invaluable ecological value. Some of these forests are also included in the List of World Heritage Sites UNESCO.1 Now, ruthless greed and large-scale corruption are seriously endangering these European natural treasures and the time for protective measures is running out. If no immediate action is taken, the still existing forests will soon be lost forever. Since the launch of the European Commission’s infringement procedure against Romania on 12 February 2020 for failing to establish effective measures against illegal logging2, thousands more hectares were destroyed.
    [Show full text]
  • Question for Written Answer
    Question for written answer E-001744/2021 to the Commission Rule 138 Sylwia Spurek (Verts/ALE), Kim Van Sparrentak (Verts/ALE), Chiara Gemma (NI), José Gusmão (The Left), Jarosław Duda (PPE), Biljana Borzan (S&D), Rosanna Conte (ID), Tanja Fajon (S&D), Estrella Durá Ferrandis (S&D), Loucas Fourlas (PPE), Radka Maxová (S&D), Miriam Lexmann (PPE), Ádám Kósa (NI), Mónica Silvana González (S&D), Stelios Kympouropoulos (PPE), Milan Brglez (S&D), Tilly Metz (Verts/ALE), Katrin Langensiepen (Verts/ALE) Subject: Deinstitutionalisation of support services for persons with disabilities On 2 October 2015, the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities published its concluding observations on the initial report of the European Union on the implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). The committee raised concerns that across the EU, persons with disabilities still live in institutions rather than in their local communities, while one of the main purposes of the CRPD, envisaged in Articles 1 and 19, is to guarantee all persons with disabilities the right to live independently. The committee noted that the European Structural and Investment Funds continue to be used in Member States to maintain residential institutions or to invest in new residential settings that remain institutional in their way of functioning. The committee recommended that the EU stop allowing such investments to continue and instead invest ambitiously in the deinstitutionalisation process. In the light of the above: 1. What concrete steps has the Commission taken to suspend, withdraw or recover payments used for the expansion or redevelopment of institutional care? 2.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Urgent Call for Action: Making Use of the Conference on the Future of Europe for Reforming Or Abolishing the EURATOM Treaty
    Urgent call for action: Making use of the Conference on the Future of Europe for reforming or abolishing the EURATOM Treaty Brussels, 6 October 2020 Dear Mrs. President of the EU Commission von der Leyen, Dear Mr. President of the European Council Michel, In your application speech for your current position held on 16 July 2019, you have passionately advocated a united, fair and equal Europe that is developing strong and ambitious solutions to the climate crisis. We welcome the commitment and energy you are putting into the implementation of the Green Deal. In order to achieve a carbon-neutral European Union until 2050 with a clean, resource efficient and competitive economy, you are focusing on fair and inclusive transitions for everyone. One of the main European Treaties, the EURATOM-Treaty, diametrically opposes your efforts. On 25 March 1957, the treaty for establishing the European Atomic Energy Community (EURATOM) was signed in Rome - at the same time as the treaty establishing the European Economic Community (EEC). The "Roman Treaties" are the foundation of today's European Union. While the EEC-Treaty has been reformed several times (EEC - EC - TFEU-Treaty), the EURATOM-Treaty has remained unchanged since 1957. Its main aim is the development of a powerful European nuclear industry. Nuclear energy "represents an essential resource for the development and invigoration of industry and will permit the advancement of the cause of peace" - up to this day. This also applies to 14 member states that have never operated nuclear power plants or that have decided to phase out nuclear energy as well as to those that reject the technology constitutionally.
    [Show full text]
  • Professionalization of Green Parties?
    Professionalization of Green parties? Analyzing and explaining changes in the external political approach of the Dutch political party GroenLinks Lotte Melenhorst (0712019) Supervisor: Dr. A. S. Zaslove 5 September 2012 Abstract There is a relatively small body of research regarding the ideological and organizational changes of Green parties. What has been lacking so far is an analysis of the way Green parties present them- selves to the outside world, which is especially interesting because it can be expected to strongly influence the image of these parties. The project shows that the Dutch Green party ‘GroenLinks’ has become more professional regarding their ‘external political approach’ – regarding ideological, or- ganizational as well as strategic presentation – during their 20 years of existence. This research pro- ject challenges the core idea of the so-called ‘threshold-approach’, that major organizational changes appear when a party is getting into government. What turns out to be at least as interesting is the ‘anticipatory’ adaptations parties go through once they have formulated government participation as an important party goal. Until now, scholars have felt that Green parties are transforming, but they have not been able to point at the core of the changes that have taken place. Organizational and ideological changes have been investigated separately, whereas in the case of Green parties organi- zation and ideology are closely interrelated. In this thesis it is argued that the external political ap- proach of GroenLinks, which used to be a typical New Left Green party but that lacks governmental experience, has become more professional, due to initiatives of various within-party actors who of- ten responded to developments outside the party.
    [Show full text]