DOCSLIB.ORG

(Central Receiver) on the Farm Sand Draai 391, Northern Cape – Draft Consultation Environmental Impact Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(Central Receiver) on the Farm Sand Draai 391, Northern Cape – Draft Consultation Environmental Impact Report Environmental Impact Assessment Study for the proposed Concentrated Solar Power Plant (Central Receiver) on the farm Sand Draai 391, Northern Cape – Draft Consultation Environmental Impact Report DEA Ref 14/12/16/3/3/3/204 March 2016 Document Description Client: Solafrica Energy (Pty) Ltd Project Name: Environmental Impact Assessment Study for the proposed Concentrated Solar Power Plant (Central Receiver) on the farm Sand Draai 391, Northern Cape Royal HaskoningDHV Reference Number: T01.JNB.000565 Compiled by: Johan Blignaut Date: February 2016 Location: Woodmead Review and approval: Prashika Reddy Page | i Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Background ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Approach to the Environmental Impact Assessment Study ............................................................... 5 1.2.1 Conclusions of the Environmental Scoping Study (ESS) ................................................................... 5 1.2.2 Environmental Impact Assessment Process ...................................................................................... 6 1.2.2.1 Environmental Impact Assessment Report Structure .................................................................. 6 1.2.2.2 Specialist Studies ......................................................................................................................... 9 1.2.2.3 Draft Environmental Management Programme ............................................................................ 9 1.3 Concurrent Licencing Processes ..................................................................................................... 10 1.3.1 Water Use Licence ........................................................................................................................... 10 1.3.2 Zoning .............................................................................................................................................. 11 1.4 Details of the Environmental Assessment Practitioner .................................................................... 11 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................... 13 2.1 Site Locality ...................................................................................................................................... 13 2.2 Detailed Design of the CSP Plant using Central Receiver Technology ........................................... 13 2.2.1 Tower/Central Receiver System ...................................................................................................... 16 2.2.2 Heliostat (Solar) Field ....................................................................................................................... 17 2.2.3 Power Block ..................................................................................................................................... 18 2.2.3.1 Pre-heating System .................................................................................................................... 18 2.2.3.2 Steam Generator System ........................................................................................................... 19 2.2.3.3 Steam Turbine Generator ........................................................................................................... 19 2.2.3.4 Air Cooled Condenser ................................................................................................................ 19 2.2.3.5 Generator/Synchronous Motor ................................................................................................... 20 2.2.4 Auxiliary Facilities/Infrastructure ...................................................................................................... 20 2.2.4.1 Water Abstraction System .......................................................................................................... 20 2.2.4.2 Water Storage (Regulation) Ponds ............................................................................................ 23 2.2.4.3 Water Treatment Infrastructure .................................................................................................. 24 2.2.4.4 Access Roads ............................................................................................................................. 25 2.2.4.5 Power Line .................................................................................................................................. 25 2.2.4.6 Waste Generation (Liquid Effluent) ............................................................................................ 26 2.2.4.7 Evaporation Ponds ..................................................................................................................... 27 2.2.4.8 Sanitary Waste ........................................................................................................................... 28 Page | ii 2.2.4.9 Solid Waste Generation.............................................................................................................. 28 2.2.4.10 Storeroom(s), Laydown Area, Construction Camp and Assembly Plant ................................... 29 2.3 Operations ........................................................................................................................................ 30 3 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES ....................................................................................... 31 3.1 Site Alternatives ............................................................................................................................... 31 3.1.1 Site Alternatives identified within the Northern Cape Province for the Establishment of the new CSP Plant 31 3.1.2 Consideration of the Sand Draai Farm for the Development of the new CSP Plant using Central Receiver Technology ................................................................................................................................. 31 3.2 Technology Alternatives ................................................................................................................... 32 3.3 Design/Layout Alternatives .............................................................................................................. 34 3.3.1 Linear Infrastructure Corridors ......................................................................................................... 34 3.3.1.1 Water Supply Pipelines .............................................................................................................. 34 3.3.1.2 Access Roads ............................................................................................................................. 34 3.3.1.3 Power (Transmission) Line ......................................................................................................... 34 3.4 No-Go Alternative ............................................................................................................................. 34 4 PROJECT NEED AND DESIRABILITY ...................................................................... 36 5 LEGISLATION ............................................................................................................ 39 5.1 National Environmental Management Act (No 107 of 1998) ........................................................... 39 5.1.1 EIA Regulations (2014) .................................................................................................................... 39 5.2 National Environmental Management: Waste Act (No 59 of 2008) ................................................. 41 5.3 The National Water Act (No 36 of 1998) .......................................................................................... 42 5.4 National Environmental Management: Air Quality Act (No 39 of 2004) ........................................... 42 5.5 Hazardous Substance Act (No 15 of 1973) and Regulations .......................................................... 43 5.6 Other Relevant Acts, Guidelines, Department Policies and Environmental Management Instruments 43 6 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION .......................................................................................... 45 6.1 Consultation with Competent Authorities ......................................................................................... 46 6.2 Consultation with other Relevant Authorities and Key Stakeholders ............................................... 47 6.3 I&AP Database ................................................................................................................................. 47 6.4 Identification of Interested and Affected Parties .............................................................................. 47 6.5 Advertising ........................................................................................................................................ 47 6.6 Issues Trail ....................................................................................................................................... 47 6.7 Review of the Environmental Impact Assessment Report and Draft Environmental Management Programme .................................................................................................................................................. 51 6.8 Public Meeting .................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix I – Avifauna Scoping Study
    SOLARRESERVE ARRIESFONTEIN SOLAR POWER PLANT: PHOTOVOLTAIC PHASE 1 - 3 Appendix I – Avifauna Scoping Study Page 250 260380PWE : 1 Rev A : 2012-03-05 PROPOSED ARRIESFONTEIN SOLAR THERMAL ENERGY POWER PLANT DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST AVIFAUNAL IMPACT ASSESMENT SCOPING REPORT November 2011 Andrew Pearson Endangered Wildlife Trust 011 486 1102 [email protected] EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Solar Reserve SA (Pty) Ltd is planning a Solar Thermal Energy Power Plant (or otherwise known as a Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) plant), as well as a multi-phase Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Project, within a single development site in the Northern Cape, South Africa. The Endangered Wildlife Trust (EWT) was subsequently appointed to conduct an avifaunal specialist study. Very few CSP plants have been constructed worldwide to date, and knowledge on the associated avifaunal impacts remains limited. The site consists mainly of uniform, arid vegetation types. Few permanent water bodies were observed on site. The proposed site falls within the Quarter Degree Grid Square (QDGS), 2823BD, while data from three additional squares, 2823BA, 2823BB, and 2823BC was also considered due to their close proximity to the site. The South African Bird Atlas Project (SABAP) recorded 12 Red Listed Species (Harrison et al, 1997), across all four squares, of which 5 are classified as Vulnerable, and 7 as Near Threatened. One additional species, the White Stork, is also included as it is protected internationally under the Bonn Convention on Migratory Species. Various other species relevant to the project were identified and include raptors, doves, pigeons and aerial foragers such as swallows and swifts. In general, SABAP2 data showed low counting effort for study site and immediate surrounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Terrestrial Television Infrastructure Rollout
    Digital Terrestrial Television Infrastructure Rollout Environmental Impact Assessment - Nakop - 1 1. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT: NAKOP 1.1 INTRODUCTION The farm Nakop is privately owned, belonging to Mr and Mrs Tonnemacher. The farm is located approximately 5km east of the Namibian Border post and approximately 6km east of the nearest settlement which is called Ariamsvlei. The presence of the Namibian border post en route to South Africa contributes to a large average number of tourists passing through the town annually. 1.2 RATIONALE FOR SITE The position of the existing microwave tower at Nakop has very good coverage even beyond the Namibian border into South Africa, covering large parts of the south-eastern extremities of Namibia (Figure 1-1). This microwave tower is however very visible from the B3 road to South Africa. For this reason the proposed site is located close to the existing infrastructure but further back from the edge of the plateau to ensure that it is not quite as visible as the existing infrastructure. Figure 1-1: Predicted coverage of the existing microwave tower at Nakop. Digital Terrestrial Television Infrastructure Rollout – NBC EIA - Nakop August 2013 2 1.3 SITE DESCRIPTION Ariamsvlei is located at the foot of a plateau and as one approaches the Orange River approximately 40km south of the town, there is a sharp decrease in elevation. The surrounding area forms part of the Nama Karoo biome and comprises of a combination of small succulents and grass species. Although not particularly high in faunal diversity, the rocky side slopes of the plateau are an optimal niche for the occurrence of a variety of reptiles and birds.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Performance Plan 2021-2022 to 2023-24
    ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN (VOTE 41) FOR THE FISCAL YEARS 2021/22 TO 2023/24 Published by the Department of Water and Sanitation Private Bag X313 Pretoria 0001 South Africa Tel: +2712 336 7500 Fax: +2712 336 8664 This annual performance plan can be obtained from www.dws.gov.za 4 5 ANNUAL PERFORMANCE Plan (VOTE 41) FOR THE FISCAL YEARS 2021/22 TO 2023/24 Foreword by the Minister ...........................................................................................................................................................................i Message from the Deputy Minister .......................................................................................................................................................iii Overview of the Accounting Officer .......................................................................................................................................................v Official sign ...............................................................................................................................................................................................off vi List of abbreviations and acronyms ......................................................................................................................................................vii Strategic overview .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Strategy map of the DWS ...........................................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Kai ! Garib Final IDP 2020 2021
    KAI !GARIB MUNICIPALITY Integrated Development Plan 2020/2021 “Creating an economically viable and fully developed municipality, which enhances the standard of living of all the inhabitants / community of Kai !Garib through good governance, excellent service delivery and sustainable development.” June 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD.................................................................................................................1 2. IDP PLANNING PROCESS:......................................................................................2 2.1 IDP Steering Committee:...........................................................................................3 2.2 IDP Representative Forum.........................................................................................3 2.3 Process Overview: Steps & Events:.............................................................................4 2.4 Legislative Framework:…………………………………………………………………………………………...6 3. THE ORGANISATION:............................................................................................15 3.1 Institutional Development………………………………………………………………………………..... 15 3.2 The Vision & Mission:...............................................................................................16 3.3 The Values of Kai !Garib Municipality which guides daily conduct ...............................16 3.4 The functioning of the municipality............................................................................16 3.4.1 Council and council committees..............................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • Namibia Handbook
    TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................. 2 LIST OF ACRONYMS .......................................................................................................... 3 1. OVERVIEW OF NAMIBIA ............................................................................................. 4 2. TRANSPORT SYSYEM ................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Border posts ............................................................................................................................... 4 3. ROAD TRANSPORT LEGISLATION ............................................................................ 6 3.1 Speed Limits ............................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Traffic Fines ................................................................................................................................ 6 4. CROSS BORDER ROAD TRANSPORT PERMITS ....................................................... 7 5. ECONOMIC OUTLOOK ................................................................................................ 7 5.1 Trade Environment .................................................................................................................... 7 5.2 Trade Agreements ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Siyanda EMF Draft Status Quo Report
    SIYANDA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK – EMF REPORT Executive Summary Introduction Environomics, leading a multi disciplinary team, was appointed to undertake the compilation of an Environmetnal Management Framework (EMF). It was a joint project between the Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEAT), the Northern Cape Department of Toursim, Environment & Conservation (NCDTEC) and the Siyanda District Minicipality (SDM). The purpose of the project is to develop an EMF that will integrate municipal and provincial decision-making and align different government mandates in a way that will put the area on a sustainable development path. Description of the area The Siyanda District covers an area of 102,661.349km2 in the Northern Cape Province and lies on the great African plateau. It falls within four physical geographical regions namely: . The Kalahari; . Bushmanland; . the Griqua fold belt; and . the Ghaap Plateau. The Kalahari basin stretches northwards from just north of the Orange River into Botswana and Namibia. It is a flat, sand covered, semi-desert area, on average between 900m to 1200m above sea-level. It is characterised by a number of large pans to the north of Upington, by dry river beds (such as the Kuruman, Nossob and Molopo Rivers) and by dunes which strike north- west to south-east. The region is underlain by Karoo rocks and rocks belonging to the tertiary Kalahari Group. Outcrops are rare. Bushmanland is an arid, level sub-region of the Cape Middleveld to the east of the Namaqua Highlands. It is underlain by granitic Precambrian rocks on the western and northern sides and by Karoo rocks towards the south-east.
    [Show full text]
  • In Upington, Northern Cape Province
    THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE (SEZ) IN UPINGTON, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE ENVIRONMENTAL SCOPING REPORT DEA Reference: 14/12/16/3/3/2/1006 DRAFT Prepared for: Northern Cape Economic Development Agency Building no 6, Monridge Office Park Corner Memorial and Kekewich Street Kimberley, 8301 Prepared by: EOH Coastal & Environmental Services EAST LONDON 25 Tecoma Street East London, 5201 043 726 7809 Also in Grahamstown, Cape Town, Johannesburg, Port Elizabeth and Maputo www.cesnet.co.za | www.eoh.co.za March 2017 Draft Scoping Report – February 2017 THE PROJECT TEAM The following table provides the names and responsibilities of the project team. EOH Coastal & Environmental Services team and responsibilities Name Role/Responsibility Environmental Assessment Practitioner (EAP) Dr Alan Carter Project Leader Report Review Project Manager Mr Roy de Kock Client Liaison Report Writing EOH Coastal & Environmental Services NCEDA Special Economic Zone, Upington TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Background to the Study ................................................................................................. 1 1.2. Special Economic Zone ................................................................................................... 1 1.3. Environmental Authorisation in South Africa .................................................................... 1 1.4. Scoping Phase ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 36740 16-8 Road Carrier Permits
    Government Gazette Staatskoerant REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA August Vol. 578 Pretoria, 16 2013 Augustus No. 36740 PART 1 OF 2 N.B. The Government Printing Works will not be held responsible for the quality of “Hard Copies” or “Electronic Files” submitted for publication purposes AIDS HELPLINE: 0800-0123-22 Prevention is the cure 303563—A 36740—1 2 No. 36740 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 16 AUGUST 2013 IMPORTANT NOTICE The Government Printing Works will not be held responsible for faxed documents not received due to errors on the fax machine or faxes received which are unclear or incomplete. Please be advised that an “OK” slip, received from a fax machine, will not be accepted as proof that documents were received by the GPW for printing. If documents are faxed to the GPW it will be the senderʼs respon- sibility to phone and confirm that the documents were received in good order. Furthermore the Government Printing Works will also not be held responsible for cancellations and amendments which have not been done on original documents received from clients. CONTENTS INHOUD Page Gazette Bladsy Koerant No. No. No. No. No. No. Transport, Department of Vervoer, Departement van Cross Border Road Transport Agency: Oorgrenspadvervoeragentskap aansoek- Applications for permits:.......................... permitte: .................................................. Menlyn..................................................... 3 36740 Menlyn..................................................... 3 36740 Applications concerning Operating Aansoeke
    [Show full text]
  • Tourist Destinations N4
    NATIONAL CERTIFICATE TOURIST DESTINATIONS N4 (22030044) 20 November 2019 (X-paper) 09:00–12:00 OPEN-BOOK EXAMINATION Candidates may take any resources into the examination venue; student portfolio, textbook, atlas, maps, travel guides, brochures and GSA magazine (February issues) 15 minutes reading time is allowed before the examination commences. This question paper consists of 12 pages and 2 addenda. Copyright reserved Please turn over (22030044) -2- DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA NATIONAL CERTIFICATE TOURIST DESTINATIONS N4 TIME: 3 HOURS MARKS: 200 NOTE: If you answer more than the required number of questions, only the required number will be marked. All work you do not want to be marked must be clearly crossed out. INSTRUCTIONS AND INFORMATION 1. This question paper consists of TWO sections: SECTION A : 40 marks SECTION B : 160 marks TOTAL : 200 marks 2. Answer ALL the questions in SECTION A. 3. Answer any FOUR of the five questions in SECTION B. 4. Read ALL the questions carefully. 5. Number the answers according to the numbering system used in this question paper. 6. Start each question on a NEW page. 7. Write neatly and legibly. Copyright reserved Please turn over (22030044) -3- SECTION A QUESTION 1: MAPWORK 1.1 What is a map? (2) 1.2 Make a neat sketch of the FOUR main compass points. (4) 1.3 Name THREE types of scales. (3) 1.4 What is the name of the 0-degree line of longitude? (2) 1.5 Name the type of map shown on ADDENDUM A (attached). (2) 1.6 State the purpose of a physical map.
    [Show full text]
  • Bundi River Adventurers CK: 1989/029121/23
    Bundi River Adventurers CK: 1989/029121/23 1 Friesland Street, Goedemoed, Durbanville, 7550 PO Box 6496, Welgemoed, 7538 Office : 021 975 9727 Fax : 086 551 3595 Email : [email protected] www.bundi.co.za A TASTE OF ADVENTURE ORANGE RIVER – 4 DAY TRIP Arrival: Arrive at our base camp, just across the Namibian border. Our camp manager will be there to welcome you. You may want to take a refreshing swim or play a game of volleyball after your day of travelling. Supper is served at 7pm. We start getting to know each other around the campfire and 8pm we give a “packing speech”. Here we teach and show you how to pack your luggage, liquid refreshments and personal belongings. This is a good time to ask all those questions that has been building about what to expect on river. Your friendly guide will be more than happy to put all your nerves to rest! Day 1: After an early breakfast, your guide will give you a safety talk and equipment demonstration. Here they will teach and show you how to paddle, what to do if you capsize and how to be safe when in a rapid. Before you go onto the river, you can fill your cooler box with ice. You will spend most of the morning drifting and getting the hang of paddling! Your first lunch break on the banks of the river, with the majestic surrounding mountains will astound you. We continue downstream until we find a campsite where we can camp for the night. Sleep under the star-lit heavens above.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Integration of the Concentrated Solar Park (CSP) Just Outside Upington Into the Eskom Network
    Issues and Responses Report (Version 4) i 12726 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Proposed integration of the Concentrated Solar Park (CSP) into the Eskom network DEA REF: 12/12/20/2606 to 12/12/20/2610 NEAS REF: DEA/EIA/0000767/774/778/785/786/2011 Issues and Responses Report Version 4 This Issues and Responses Report (IRR) captures the comments and issues raised by stakeholders during the five separate environmental studies and the proposed amendment of an existing environmental impact assessment for the proposed integration of the Concentrated Solar Park (CSP) just outside Upington into the Eskom network. As part of the announcement phase, a Background Information Document (BID), with a comment and registration sheet was distributed to potentially interested and affected parties during November 2011. The BID was also handed out and site notices were put up during the second week of November 2011 along the various alternative corridors being investigated for this proposed development. An advertisement was also placed in various newspapers along the proposed corridors during November 2011 to announce this project. The Draft Scoping Reports (DSRs) were available for public review from 23 January to 2 March 2012. Stakeholders were notified of the availability of the DSRs for comment through the placement of advertisements and notification letters. Meetings were also held from 6 to 9 February 2012 in Kathu, Olifantshoek, Upington, Keimoes, Kakamas and Kenhardt to discuss the content of the DSRs with stakeholders. Comments and issues raised at these meetings and as a result of the public review process of the DSR were captured in this report which were an appendix to the two Final Scoping Reports.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017 - 2018
    ANNUAL REPORT 2017 - 2018 www.experiencenortherncape.com page | 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUBMISSION OF ANNUAL REPORT .............................................................................................................. 3 PART A GENERAL INFORMATION 1. PUBLIC ENTITY’S GENERAL INFORMATION .......................................................................................... 5 2. LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS/ACRONYMS ................................................................................................. 6 3. STRATEGIC OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................... 7 4. LEGISLATIVE MANDATES ....................................................................................................................... 8 5. ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE ............................................................................................................. 9 6. FOREWORD BY THE CHAIRPERSON ...................................................................................................... 10 7. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S OVERVIEW ............................................................................................. 11 PART B PERFORMANCE INFORMATION 1. STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR PERFORMANCE INFORMATION............................................ 14 2. AUDITOR GENERAL’S REPORT: PREDETERMINED OBJECTIVES ......................................................... 15 3. PERFORMANCE INDICATION BY PROGRAMME ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]