DOCSLIB.ORG

50094 Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 233, / Tuesday, December 4, 1990 / Notices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
50094 Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 233, / Tuesday, December 4, 1990 / Notices 50094 Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 233, / Tuesday, December 4, 1990 / Notices The priority now states that the RIE project exemplary practices in the use of school package are published in this issue of must “Develop and implement a procedure to exiting data in planning State transition the Federal Register. This consolidated validate exemplary programs * * * involving programs. individuals with disabilities and technical application package includes the closing experts in the validation process.” The [FR Doc. 90-28341 Filed 12-3-90; 8:45 am] dates, estimated funding, and Secretary believes that since the purpose of BILLING CODE 4000-01-M application forms necessary to apply for the RIEs is to implement program awards under one of these programs. replications, consumer organizations are Potential applicants should consult the involved as information targets to the extent DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION statement of the final priorities they are involved in operating or facilitating program replications. The RIEs are not the published in this issue to ascertain the [CFDA Nos.: 84.133A, 84.133B, 84.133D, and substantive requirements for their primary mechanism for dissemination of 84.133E] rehabilitation information to consumer applications. organizations. Office of Special Education and The estimates of funding levels in this C han ges: None. Rehabilitative Services notice do not bind the Department of C om m ent: Several commentera urged that Education to make awards in any of the priority focus on assisted housing for these categories, or to any specific individuals with long-term mental illness was National Institute on Disability and too restrictive, and emphasized the need for Rehabilitation Research; Invitation for number of awards or funding levels, information in other areas. Some commentera Applications for New Awards Under unless otherwise specified in statute. have stressed that appropriate use of State Certain Programs for Fiscal Year 1991 Applicable Regulations data, especially school exiting data, is a key element in planning for transition programs, Note to Applicants The Education Department General and suggested that RIEs focus on this aspect This notice is a complete application Administrative Regulations (EDGAR), 34 of transition programs. package. The notice contains CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 80, 81, 82, 85, and Discussion: Priority areas for RIEs are 86; and the following program selected based on both the needs of service information, application forms, and delivery agencies and the availability of instructions needed to apply for a grant regulations: model projects that potentially could be under these competitions. NIDRR Research and Demonstration Program validated and replicated. Most of the published a consolidated application (CFDA No. 84.133A) 34 CFR parts 350 suggested additional priority areas in long­ package on August 1,1990 at 55 FR and 351. term mental illness are being addressed by 31318 for several programs in which Rehabilitation Research and Training the RRTCs, and the RRTCs have a strong there are no priorities. NIDRR also Centers (CFDA No. 84.133B) 34 CFR mandate to disseminate information. published a closing date notice on parts 350 and 352. However, the Secretary agrees that RIEs could contribute significantly to the August 23,1990 at 56 FR 34085 for State Knowledge Dissemination and resolution of transition problems by Grants for Technology-Related Utilization Program (CFDA No. 84.133D) identifying and disseminating model State Assistance for Individuals with 34 CFR parts 350 and 355. planning efforts. Disabilities under Public Law 100-407. Rehabilitation Engineering Centers C h an ges: The priority includes a specific The final priorities for the programs Program (CFDA No. 84.133E) 34 CFR requirement for the identification of included in this consolidated application parts 350 and 353. Program Title: Research and Demonstration Appucation Notices for Fiscal Year 1991 Deadline for Estimated Estimated Project CFDA No. Program Title Funding Priority Transmittal of No. of Size of Award Per Period Applications Awards Year (Months) 84.133A. Research and Demonstration. Health Care Policy and Rehabilitation........ March 1, 1991 $175,000 36 National Job Coach Study.......................... March 1, 1991 175.000 36 Involving People With Psychiatric Disabil­ March 1, 1991 175.000 36 ities as Consumer Advocates in Voca­ tional Rehabilitation. National Study of Transition of Individuals March 1, 1991 175.000 36 with Severe Disabilities Leaving School. Alcohol and Substance Abuse as Barriers March 1, 1991 175.000 36 to Job Re-entry for Persons With Trau­ matic Brain Injury. Case Management in the Vocational Re­ March 1, 1991 175.000 36 habilitation of Persons With Psychiatric Disability. Purpose: Research and Demonstration rehabilitation of individuals with (1) The proposed activity relates to Projects support research and disabilities. the announced priority; demonstrations in single project areas Selection criteria: The Secretary uses (2) The research is likely to produce on problems encountered by individuals the following selection criteria to new and useful information (research with disabilities in th,eir daily activities. evaluate applications under this activities only); These projects may conduct research on program: (3) The need and target population are rehabilitation techniques and services, (a) Potential impact of outcomes: adequately defined; including analysis of medical, industrial, Importance of Program (Weight 3.0). The (4) The outcomes are likely to benefit vocational, social, psychiatric, Secretary reviews each application to the defined target population; psychological, recreational, economic, determine to what degree— and other factors to improve the (5) The training needs are clearly defined (training activities only); Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 233, / Tuesday, December 4, 1990 / Notices 58GS5 (6) The training methods and (9) The training content is service setting. developed subject matter are likely to comprehensive and at an appropriate (f) Program/project management; plan meet the defined need (training level (training activities only); of operation (Weight 2.0). The Secretary activities only); and (10) The training methods are likely to reviews each application to determine to (7) The need for information exists be effective (training activities only); what degree— (utilization activities only). (11) The new materials (if developed) (1) There is an effective plan of (b) Potential impact of outcomes: are likely to be of high quality and operation that insures proper and Dissemination/Utilization (Weight 3.0). uniqueness (training activities only); efficient administration of the project(s); The Secretary reviews each application (12) The target populations are linked (2) The applicant’s planned use of its to determine to what degree— to the project (utilization activities only); resources and personnel is likely to and achieve each objective; (1) The research results are likely to (13) The format of the dissemination (3) Collaboration between institutions, become available to others working in medium is the best to achieve the if proposed, is likely to be effective; and the field (research activities only); desired result (utilization activities (4) There is a clear description of how (2) The means to disseminate and only). the applicant will include eligible promote utilization by others are (d) Probability of achieving proposed participants who have been traditionally defined; outcomes: Key Personnel (Weight 4.0). underrepresented, such as— (3) The training methods and content The Secretary reviews each application (i) Members of racial or ethnic are to be packaged for dissemination to determine to what degree— minority groups; and use by others (training activities (1) The principal investigator and (ii) Women; only); and other key staff have adequate training (iii) Handicapped persons; and (4) The utilization approach is likely and/or experience and demonstrate (iv) The elderly. to address the defined need (utilization appropriate potential to conduct the (g) Program/project management: activities only). proposed research, demonstration, adequacy of resources (Weight 1.0). The (c) Probability of achieving proposed training, development, or dissemination Secretary reviews each application to outcomes; program/project design activity; determine to what degree— (Weight 5.0). The Secretary reviews (2) The principal investigator and (1) The facilities planned for use are each application to determine to what other key staff are familiar with adequate; degree— pertinent literature and/ or methods; (2) The equipment and supplies (1) The objectives of the project(s) are (3) All required disciplines are planned for use are adequate; and clearly stated; effectively covered; (3) The commitment of the applicant (2) The hypothesis is sound and based (4) Commitments of staff time are to provide administrative support and adequate for the project; and adequate facilities is evident. on evidence (research and activities (h) Program/project management: only); (5) The applicant is likely, as part of its non-discriminatory employment (budget and cost effectiveness (Weight (3) The project design/methodology is 1.0). The Secretary reviews each likely to achieve the objectives; practices, to encourage applications for employment from persons who are application to determine to what (4) The measurement methodology degree— and analysis is sound (research and members of groups that traditionally
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NGA | 2017 Annual Report
    N A TIO NAL G ALL E R Y O F A R T 2017 ANNUAL REPORT ART & EDUCATION W. Russell G. Byers Jr. Board of Trustees COMMITTEE Buffy Cafritz (as of September 30, 2017) Frederick W. Beinecke Calvin Cafritz Chairman Leo A. Daly III Earl A. Powell III Louisa Duemling Mitchell P. Rales Aaron Fleischman Sharon P. Rockefeller Juliet C. Folger David M. Rubenstein Marina Kellen French Andrew M. Saul Whitney Ganz Sarah M. Gewirz FINANCE COMMITTEE Lenore Greenberg Mitchell P. Rales Rose Ellen Greene Chairman Andrew S. Gundlach Steven T. Mnuchin Secretary of the Treasury Jane M. Hamilton Richard C. Hedreen Frederick W. Beinecke Sharon P. Rockefeller Frederick W. Beinecke Sharon P. Rockefeller Helen Lee Henderson Chairman President David M. Rubenstein Kasper Andrew M. Saul Mark J. Kington Kyle J. Krause David W. Laughlin AUDIT COMMITTEE Reid V. MacDonald Andrew M. Saul Chairman Jacqueline B. Mars Frederick W. Beinecke Robert B. Menschel Mitchell P. Rales Constance J. Milstein Sharon P. Rockefeller John G. Pappajohn Sally Engelhard Pingree David M. Rubenstein Mitchell P. Rales David M. Rubenstein Tony Podesta William A. Prezant TRUSTEES EMERITI Diana C. Prince Julian Ganz, Jr. Robert M. Rosenthal Alexander M. Laughlin Hilary Geary Ross David O. Maxwell Roger W. Sant Victoria P. Sant B. Francis Saul II John Wilmerding Thomas A. Saunders III Fern M. Schad EXECUTIVE OFFICERS Leonard L. Silverstein Frederick W. Beinecke Albert H. Small President Andrew M. Saul John G. Roberts Jr. Michelle Smith Chief Justice of the Earl A. Powell III United States Director Benjamin F. Stapleton III Franklin Kelly Luther M.
    [Show full text]
  • Abandoned Shipwreck Act Guidelines*
    DISCLAIMER: As Member States provide national legislations, hyperlinks and explanatory notes (if any), UNESCO does not guarantee their accuracy, nor their up-dating on this web site, and is not liable for any incorrect information. COPYRIGHT: All rights reserved.This information may be used only for research, educational, legal and non- commercial purposes, with acknowledgement of UNESCO Cultural Heritage Laws Database as the source (© UNESCO). Abandoned Shipwreck Act Guidelines* Introduction The Abandoned Shipwreck Act (Pub.L. 100-298; 43 U.S.C. 2101-2106) was signed into law by the President of the United States on April 28, 1988. Under the Act, the U.S. Government asserted title to three categories of abandoned shipwrecks: abandoned shipwrecks embedded in a State's submerged lands; abandoned shipwrecks embedded in coralline formations protected by a State on its submerged lands; and abandoned shipwrecks located on a State's submerged lands and included in or determined eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. Upon asserting title, the U.S. Government transferred its title to the majority of those shipwrecks to the respective States to manage. The United States retained its title to shipwrecks located in or on public lands while Indian tribes hold title to shipwrecks located in or on Indian lands. The Act directs the National Park Service to prepare the guidelines being issued herewith to assist the States and Federal agencies in developing legislation and regulations to carry out their responsibilities under the Act. In accordance with the Act, the guidelines are intended to maximize the enhancement of cultural resources; foster a partnership among sport divers, fishermen, archeologists, salvors, and other interests to manage shipwreck resources of the States and the United States; facilitate access and utilization by recreational interests; and recognize the interests of individuals and groups engaged in shipwreck discovery and salvage.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel Mackay! Program
    Connecticut Preservation News July/August 2015 Volume XXXVIII, No. 4 E.Marchitto Window Restoration Diary By Jane Montanaro, Director of Preservation Services Repairing and maintaining good old historic wood windows is not as intimidating as it might seem. With some instruction and proper tools, anyone can achieve impressive results, as I learned while attending a window repair workshop in March. Greg Farmer, Connecticut Circuit Rider, and Judy L. Hayward, executive director of Windsor Preservation Education Institute in Vermont, arranged to bring this workshop to Connecticut, funded by a grant from the Connecticut State Historic Preservation Office, Department of Economic and Community Development. The Connecticut Trust had been working with the Town of Waterford and town historian Bob Nye to plan for the preservation of its picturesque vernacular Nevins Tenant Cottage (c.1890), so this was a great subject house for the workshop. Instructor Sally Fishburn, of S. A. Fishburn, Inc., an historic preservation and custom cabinetry firm located in No need to replace this window—it can be repaired. northern Vermont, brought her expertise and incredible. Jane Montanaro learned how at a Connecticut Trust workshop. passion for window restoration to the program continued on page 8 _______________________________________ In This Issue... _______________________________________ Got Mill? 2 _______________________________________ Around the State 10 _______________________________________ Historic Properties Exchange 16 Connecticut Close-Ups 20 The Connecticut Trust for Historic Preservation is a private, nonprofit organization. ISSN 1084-189X Got Mill? Resources for Revitalizing Historic Industrial Properties By Renée Tribert, Project Manager, Making Places ince November 2014, the Connecticut wager that clearing the site will S Trust for Historic Preservation increase their tax base in the future, has been creating a statewide inventory or should they remake this liability of historic industrial complexes through into an asset working with what its Making Places program.
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline Watershed Assessment Pequonnock River Watershed
    Baseline Watershed Assessment Pequonnock River Watershed City of Bridgeport September 2010 In Cooperation With: Pequonnock River Initiative Project No. 20090730.A10 Table of Contents Baseline Watershed Assessment Pequonnock River Watershed 1 Introduction .................................................................................1 1.1 Development of the Baseline Assessment Report ....................................................2 1.2 Background .....................................................................................................................3 1.3 Watershed Stewardship Efforts....................................................................................6 2 Study Area Description...............................................................9 2.1 Municipal Jurisdictions ..................................................................................................9 2.2 Pequonnock River Watershed ....................................................................................10 2.3 Subwatersheds...............................................................................................................12 3 Historical and Social Perspective............................................13 3.1 History of the Watershed ............................................................................................13 3.2 Population and Demographics...................................................................................20 3.3 Historical Resources.....................................................................................................23
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the Archaeological Society of Connecticut Number 65 2003
    BULLETIN OF THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CONNECTICUT NUMBER 65 2003 LUCIANNE LAYIN Editor CONTENTS Editor's Comer . Maritime History of Southern New England: The View From Long Island. New York DARIA E. MER WIN 3 Maritime Resources in the Food Economy of Nantucket's Native Americans MARY LYNNE RAINEY 19 The British Attack at Essex. Connecticut & Related Archival! Archaeological Investigation DON MALCARNE 31 Submerged Prehistoric Sites in Southern New England: Past Research and Future Directions DARIA E. MERWIN. DANIEL P. LYNCH. and DAVID S. ROBINSON _ 41 Landlubbers in a Wet World: Administrative Perspectives on Connecticut's Underwater Heritage DA VID A. POIRIER and NICHOLAS F. BELLANTONI _ 57 Contributors .. ........... _ 67 Cover: Nineteenth century vessels common to southern New England waters (Merwin, Figure 2). THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY or- CONNECTICUT. lOR NEW STREET. SEYMOUR CT 06483 ISSN: 0739-56 I2 EDITOR'S CORNER This year's Bulletin is a special thematic issue on maritime archaeology. Most of the articles originally were presented at the 2002 Spring Meeting of the Archaeological Society of Connecticut. The meeting was very successful. The papers were well received and generated much discussion during their presentations and at the happy hour that followed them. For this reason, and because maritime site identification and analysis is such a hot archaeology topic today, the Board of Directors thought it appropriate to publish a special Bulletin devoted solely to that subject. The papers are a mix of issues relating to maritime history and archaeology in southern New England. Some focus on research technologies and methodologies, others on theory or regulatory procedures tor excavating, analyzing and protecting maritime sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2 APPENDIX E.09 CULTURAL RESOURCES and HISTORIC PROPERTIES – ERRATA SHEET
    Appendix E.09 Cultural Resources and Historic Properties Tier 1 Final EIS Volume 2 APPENDIX E.09 CULTURAL RESOURCES AND HISTORIC PROPERTIES – ERRATA SHEET Incorrect Tier 1 Draft EIS Text/Table Tier 1 Final EIS Text/Table (Volume 2) Page Description Page 1. 3-32 Resource counts were updated for Environmental Consequences for Data Matrices two NHLs: The Woodlands in Philadelphia, PA and College Hill Historic District in Providence, RI as a result of data refinement. 2. 7 Alternative 1 Environmental Consequences in New London County, Data Matrices CT was changed. The NHL Old Lyme Historic District now reads: new ROW-aerial. 3. 35-68 Affected Environment and Context Area data were updated based Data Matrices on a manual analysis of NHL locations reported on the NPS database for the existing NEC and each Action Alternative. Refining these data resulted in only minor property count changes that do not change the outcome of the FEIS. Tier 1 Final EIS P a g e | 1 Volume 2 Cultural Resources and Historic Properties Effects Assessment Methodology February 28, 2014 Version Final Revised October 3, 2015 Submitted by: Cultural Resources and Historic Properties Effects Assessment Methodology Table of Contents 1. CULTURAL RESOURCES AND HISTORIC PROPERTIES EFFECTS ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ........................ 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 DEFINITIONS............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA SSIFI C ATI ON
    Form No. 10-300 (Rev. 10-74) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES lllllill INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM iiiliillliiii SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOWTO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS NAME HISTORIC Priscilla Dailey AND/OR COMMON Bridgeport Harbor, -south of Stratford Avenue Bridge _NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Bridgeport V1C|N|TVOF 4th-Stewart B. McKinney STATE CODE COUNTY CODE Connecticut 09 Pairfield 001 UCLA SSIFI c ATI ON CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE —DISTRICT —PUBLIC —OCCUPIED —AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM _BUILDING(S) X_PRIVATE 2SLUNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL —PARK ^.STRUCTURE —BOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS ^.OBJECT _IN PROCESS —YES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED — YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION _ NO —MILITARY —OTHER: [OWNER OF PROPERTY NAME George W. Koenig STREET & NUMBER 221 Anton Drive CITY, TOWN STATE Bridgeport VICINITY OF CT LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. Officer in Charge, Kiz^ne Inspection REGISTRY OF DEEDS.ETC. U.S. CO6St Guard STREET & NUMBER Battery Park Building CITY. TOWN STATE New York tl REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE Connecticut Statewide Inventory of Historic Resources DATE 1975 —FEDERAL ^STATE —COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS Connecticut Historical Commission CITY, TOWN STATE Hartford CT DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT X_DETERIORATED _UNALTERED —ORIGINAL SITE —GOOD _RUINS JCALTERED —MOVED DATE_______ —FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The Priscilla Dailey (U.S. Registry #170368) is a wooden unpowered canal boat now sunk in Bridgeport Harbor near the Stratford Avenue Bridge. About a third of its hull is visible at neap tide.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E.09 Cultural Resources and Historic Properties
    Appendix E.09 Cultural Resources and Historic Properties Tier 1 Draft EIS Cultural Resources and Historic Properties Effects Assessment Methodology February 28, 2014 Version Final Revised October 3, 2015 Submitted by: Cultural Resources and Historic Properties Effects Assessment Methodology Table of Contents 1. CULTURAL RESOURCES AND HISTORIC PROPERTIES EFFECTS ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ........................ 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 DEFINITIONS............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 RELATED RESOURCES .................................................................................................................................. 2 1.4 AGENCY AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ........................................................................................................ 2 1.4.1 Regulatory Compliance ..................................................................................................................... 4 1.5 METHODOLOGY TO ASSESS EFFECTS ............................................................................................................... 5 1.5.1 Existing Conditions ........................................................................................................................... 5 1.5.2 Environmental Consequences ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut Bicentennial GAZETTE
    D , Am3 5 rb n v k ^. • • CONNECTICU T V 6 XHE STATE UBRARY n ° : 1 bnnedticu t sgms^ : .gfIllrtjlgW^i­ t I r/if Charter Oak CONNECTICU T VOLUM E V I NUMBE R MARC H 197 7 THE CONNECTICUT HISTORY COMMONS Proposed Program for State Museum Completed The long-awaited program study for the Connecticut "The Connecticut History Commons shall be education­ State Museum, Connecticut's permanent and lasting me­ ally oriented, professionally managed, and shall encourage morial to the Bicentennial, was presented to the January public participation and involvement. Its primary business meeting of the Connecticut Historical Commission — shall be the communication of ideas," Mr. Porter wrote. ARBCC by consultant Daniel R. Porter. The study was The study proposes that the Commons be divided into financed by a grant from Middletown, proposed site of the three zones, each utilizing to some degree audio-visual, ex­ museum. hibition, demonstration and visitor participation techniques Entitled "A Program for the Connecticut History Com­ so that the visitor actively participates in the museum ex­ mons" Mr. Porter put forth a plan for an approach to the perience rather than being merely a passive viewer. museum which would provide "an active, unique center Zone one is proposed to be a Presentation Center which where human and natural history of Connecticut will be will take the form of the more traditional museum, but presented and demonstrated." place its emphasis on the inspirational. It would be the The Commons would serve the citizens of Connecticut in function of the Center to gather representative aspects of five ways: through mobile exhibits in a trailer; through State history under one roof, so that the visitor under­ travelling exhibits for public buildings; through consulting stands Connecticut's heritage and is guided by the State's services; through radio and television programming; and continued on page 8 through publications.
    [Show full text]
  • Empress Sagafjord to Alaska 20 There’S Something About Mary 28 of Britain 10 Kate Mccue’S Journey to the Bridge 40 S Hip Research: the Basics 46
    Number 303 • fall 2017 PowerT HE M AGAZINE OF E NGINE -P OWERED V ESSELS FRO M T HEShips S T EA M SHI P H IS T ORICAL S OCIE T Y OF A M ERICA MIGHT, STYLE & SPLENDOR: ALSO IN THIS ISSUE EMPRESS Sagafjord to Alaska 20 There’s Something About Mary 28 of BRITAIN 10 Kate McCue’s Journey to the Bridge 40 S hip Research: The Basics 46 PowerShips303.indd 1 10/9/17 12:59 PM Thanks to All Who Continue to Support SSHSA October 2016 -October 2017 Fleet Admiral – $50,000+ Admiral – $20,000+ Maritime Heritage Grant Program The Dibner Charitable The Family of Helen & Henry Posner, Jr. Trust of Massachusetts The Estate of Mr. Donald Stoltenberg Heritage Harbor Fdn. Benefactor ($5,000+) Mr. Thomas C. Ragan Mr. Richard Rabbett Leader ($1,000+) Mr. James Berwind Mr. Nicholas Langhart CAPT Dave Pickering Mr. Douglas E. Bryan Mr. H. F. Lenfest Mr. Kenneth E. Schaller Amica Companies Foundation Mr. Barry W. Eager Mr. Ralph S. McCrea Mr. and Mrs. James W. Shuttleworth Mr. Charles T. Andrews Mr. and Mrs. Donald W. Eberle CAPT and Mrs. James J. McNamara Mr. Andy Tyska Mr. Jason Arabian Mr. and Mrs. Arthur J. Ferguson Mr. Don Leavitt Mr. Peregrine White Mr. Peter A. Aron Mr. & Mrs. Christopher W. Kolb CAPT & Mrs. Roland R. Parent Exxon Mobil Foundation Mr. & Mrs. Jeffrey Lockhart Mr. Paul T. Rudolph Sponsor ($250+) Dr. Jerry Fingerut Mr. Jeff MacKlin Mr. Todd J. F. Schaumloffel Mr. Ronald Amos Mr. Raymond H. Fredette Mr. and Mrs. Jack Madden Schneider Electric Mr.
    [Show full text]