DOCSLIB.ORG

Baseline Watershed Assessment Pequonnock River Watershed

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Baseline Watershed Assessment Pequonnock River Watershed Baseline Watershed Assessment Pequonnock River Watershed City of Bridgeport September 2010 In Cooperation With: Pequonnock River Initiative Project No. 20090730.A10 Table of Contents Baseline Watershed Assessment Pequonnock River Watershed 1 Introduction .................................................................................1 1.1 Development of the Baseline Assessment Report ....................................................2 1.2 Background .....................................................................................................................3 1.3 Watershed Stewardship Efforts....................................................................................6 2 Study Area Description...............................................................9 2.1 Municipal Jurisdictions ..................................................................................................9 2.2 Pequonnock River Watershed ....................................................................................10 2.3 Subwatersheds...............................................................................................................12 3 Historical and Social Perspective............................................13 3.1 History of the Watershed ............................................................................................13 3.2 Population and Demographics...................................................................................20 3.3 Historical Resources.....................................................................................................23 3.4 Recreation and Community Resources .....................................................................26 4 Natural Resources.....................................................................28 4.1 Geology and Soils.........................................................................................................28 4.2 Topography...................................................................................................................28 4.3 Hydrology......................................................................................................................32 4.4 Flood Hazard Areas .....................................................................................................35 4.5 Climate ...........................................................................................................................37 4.6 Wetlands ........................................................................................................................38 4.6.1 Resource Description.....................................................................................38 4.6.2 Existing Wetlands Information ....................................................................40 4.7 Fish and Wildlife Resources........................................................................................42 4.7.1 Fish....................................................................................................................42 4.7.2 Birds..................................................................................................................44 4.7.3 Amphibians & Reptiles ..................................................................................44 4.7.4 Threatened and Endangered Species...........................................................45 5 Watershed Modifications..........................................................48 5.1 Dams and Impoundments ..........................................................................................48 5.2 Water Supply.................................................................................................................50 5.3 Wastewater ....................................................................................................................51 5.4 Stormwater ....................................................................................................................51 5.4.1 Municipal Phase II Stormwater Program....................................................53 5.4.1.1 Bridgeport .......................................................................................53 5.4.1.2 Trumbull ........................................................................................54 5.4.1.3 Monroe...........................................................................................54 F:\P2009\0730\A10\Baseline Watershed Assessment\Baseline Watershed Assessment.doc i Table of Contents Baseline Watershed Assessment Pequonnock River Watershed 5.5 Regulated Sites ..............................................................................................................54 6 Water Quality .............................................................................59 6.1 Classification, Standards, and Impairments..............................................................59 6.2 CTDEP Ambient Water Quality Monitoring Program..........................................65 6.2.1 Monitoring Program.......................................................................................65 6.2.2 Metals................................................................................................................67 6.2.3 Nutrients ..........................................................................................................68 6.2.4 Benthic Macroinvertebrates ..........................................................................68 6.3 Harbor Watch / River Watch Water Quality Monitoring Program .....................70 6.4 City of Bridgeport CSO Receiving Water Monitoring Program ...........................77 7 Land Use and Land Cover ........................................................79 7.1 Current Conditions ......................................................................................................79 7.1.1 Land Use ..........................................................................................................79 7.1.2 Zoning ..............................................................................................................81 7.1.3 Land Cover ......................................................................................................83 7.1.4 Forest Cover....................................................................................................86 7.1.4.1 Forest Fragmentation......................................................................87 7.1.5 Developed Areas.............................................................................................88 7.1.6 Impervious Cover...........................................................................................91 7.1.7 Open Space......................................................................................................95 7.2 Future Conditions ........................................................................................................98 7.2.1 Watershed Buildout Analysis ........................................................................98 7.2.1.1 Developable Land and Future Land Use ........................................98 7.2.1.2 Impervious Cover.......................................................................... 100 8 Pollutant Loading ....................................................................103 8.1 Model Description..................................................................................................... 103 8.2 Model Inputs.............................................................................................................. 104 8.2.1 Nonpoint Source Runoff............................................................................ 104 8.2.2 Other Pollutant Sources.............................................................................. 104 8.2.2.1 Combined Sewer Overflows........................................................... 104 8.2.2.2 Illicit Discharges........................................................................... 105 8.2.2.3 Septic Systems.............................................................................. 105 8.2.2.4 Managed Turf.............................................................................. 105 8.2.2.5 Road Sanding.............................................................................. 105 8.3 Existing Pollutant Loads .......................................................................................... 106 8.4 Future Pollutant Loads............................................................................................. 108 9 Comparative Subwatershed Analysis ...................................110 F:\P2009\0730\A10\Baseline Watershed Assessment\Baseline Watershed Assessment.doc ii Table of Contents Baseline Watershed Assessment Pequonnock River Watershed 9.1 Priority Subwatersheds for Conservation .............................................................. 110 9.2 Priority Subwatersheds for Restoration ................................................................. 113 9.3 Subwatersheds Recommended for Field Assessments ........................................ 116 10 References...............................................................................119 Tables Page 2-1 Distribution of Municipalities in the Pequonnock River Watershed 9 2-2 Profile of the Pequonnock River Watershed 11 2-3 Pequonnock River Subwatersheds 12 3-1 National and State Register of Historic Places and Local Historic Districts 25 4-1 Miles of Mapped Streams Within Each Subwatershed 32 4-2 Peak Flow Frequency
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 50094 Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 233, / Tuesday, December 4, 1990 / Notices
    50094 Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 233, / Tuesday, December 4, 1990 / Notices The priority now states that the RIE project exemplary practices in the use of school package are published in this issue of must “Develop and implement a procedure to exiting data in planning State transition the Federal Register. This consolidated validate exemplary programs * * * involving programs. individuals with disabilities and technical application package includes the closing experts in the validation process.” The [FR Doc. 90-28341 Filed 12-3-90; 8:45 am] dates, estimated funding, and Secretary believes that since the purpose of BILLING CODE 4000-01-M application forms necessary to apply for the RIEs is to implement program awards under one of these programs. replications, consumer organizations are Potential applicants should consult the involved as information targets to the extent DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION statement of the final priorities they are involved in operating or facilitating program replications. The RIEs are not the published in this issue to ascertain the [CFDA Nos.: 84.133A, 84.133B, 84.133D, and substantive requirements for their primary mechanism for dissemination of 84.133E] rehabilitation information to consumer applications. organizations. Office of Special Education and The estimates of funding levels in this C han ges: None. Rehabilitative Services notice do not bind the Department of C om m ent: Several commentera urged that Education to make awards in any of the priority focus on assisted housing for these categories, or to any specific individuals with long-term mental illness was National Institute on Disability and too restrictive, and emphasized the need for Rehabilitation Research; Invitation for number of awards or funding levels, information in other areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Temporal Assessment of Connecticut Lake Water Clarity Using Landsat Satellite Imagery
    Multi-temporal Assessment of Connecticut Lake Water Clarity Using Landsat Satellite Imagery Multi-temporal Assessment of Connecticut Lake Water Clarity Using Landsat Satellite Imagery Basic Information Title: Multi-temporal Assessment of Connecticut Lake Water Clarity Using Landsat Satellite Imagery Project Number: 2010CT208B Start Date: 3/1/2010 End Date: 2/28/2011 Funding Source: 104B Congressional District: District 2 Research Category: Water Quality Focus Category: Water Quality, Surface Water, None Descriptors: None Principal Investigators: Daniel Civco, James D Hurd Multi-temporal Assessment of Connecticut Lake Water Clarity Using Landsat Satellite Imagery1 Multi-temporal Assessment of Connecticut Lake Water Clarity Using Landsat Satellite Imagery Progress Report May 2011 Daniel Civco – Principal Investigator James Hurd – Co-Investigator Center for Landuse Education and Research (CLEAR) Department of Natural Resources and the Environment The University of Connecticut 1376 Storrs Road Storrs, CT 06269-4087 (p) 860-486-4610, (f) 860-486-5408 [email protected] [email protected] RESEARCH PROBLEM Connecticut has over 1,000 lakes and ponds larger than 5 acres in area. These water bodies provide important recreational opportunities, aesthetic values, and ecosystem services that contribute to the quality of life, environment, and economy of the state. Over the past 400 years, Connecticut has undergone significant alterations to its landscape. As a result of these mostly anthropogenic activities, including clearing of forests, agriculture, and urban and rural development, there have been significant impacts to the water quality of Connecticut’s lakes and ponds. While a natural process, the eutrophication of lakes caused by excess nutrient export in runoff has been, and continues to be, a pervasive problem (Siver et al., 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • NGA | 2017 Annual Report
    N A TIO NAL G ALL E R Y O F A R T 2017 ANNUAL REPORT ART & EDUCATION W. Russell G. Byers Jr. Board of Trustees COMMITTEE Buffy Cafritz (as of September 30, 2017) Frederick W. Beinecke Calvin Cafritz Chairman Leo A. Daly III Earl A. Powell III Louisa Duemling Mitchell P. Rales Aaron Fleischman Sharon P. Rockefeller Juliet C. Folger David M. Rubenstein Marina Kellen French Andrew M. Saul Whitney Ganz Sarah M. Gewirz FINANCE COMMITTEE Lenore Greenberg Mitchell P. Rales Rose Ellen Greene Chairman Andrew S. Gundlach Steven T. Mnuchin Secretary of the Treasury Jane M. Hamilton Richard C. Hedreen Frederick W. Beinecke Sharon P. Rockefeller Frederick W. Beinecke Sharon P. Rockefeller Helen Lee Henderson Chairman President David M. Rubenstein Kasper Andrew M. Saul Mark J. Kington Kyle J. Krause David W. Laughlin AUDIT COMMITTEE Reid V. MacDonald Andrew M. Saul Chairman Jacqueline B. Mars Frederick W. Beinecke Robert B. Menschel Mitchell P. Rales Constance J. Milstein Sharon P. Rockefeller John G. Pappajohn Sally Engelhard Pingree David M. Rubenstein Mitchell P. Rales David M. Rubenstein Tony Podesta William A. Prezant TRUSTEES EMERITI Diana C. Prince Julian Ganz, Jr. Robert M. Rosenthal Alexander M. Laughlin Hilary Geary Ross David O. Maxwell Roger W. Sant Victoria P. Sant B. Francis Saul II John Wilmerding Thomas A. Saunders III Fern M. Schad EXECUTIVE OFFICERS Leonard L. Silverstein Frederick W. Beinecke Albert H. Small President Andrew M. Saul John G. Roberts Jr. Michelle Smith Chief Justice of the Earl A. Powell III United States Director Benjamin F. Stapleton III Franklin Kelly Luther M.
    [Show full text]
  • YOUR SOURCE for CT Fishing Information
    Share the Experience—Take Someone Fishing • APRIL 14 Opening Day Trout Fishing 2018 CONNECTICUT ANGLER’S GUIDE INLAND & MARINE FISHING YOUR SOURCE For CT Fishing Information »New Trout & »New Inland »New Marine Salmon Stamp Regulations Regulations See page 8 & 20 for 2018 for 2018 See page 20 See page 58 Connecticut Department of Energy & Environmental Protection www.ct.gov/deep/fishing FISHING REGULATIONS GUIDE - GA TRIM: . 8˝ X 10-1/2˝ (AND VARIOUS OTHER STATES) BLEED: . 8-1/4˝ X 10-3/4˝ SAFETY: . 7˝ X 10˝ TRIM TRIM SAFETY TRIM BLEED BLEED SAFETY BLEED BLEED TRIM TRIM SAFETY SAFETY SAFETY SAFETY TRIM TRIM BLEED BLEED TRIM TRIM TRIM BLEED BLEED SAFETY SAFETY Client: Progressive Job No: 16D00890 Created by: Dalon Wolford Applications: InDesign CC, Adobe Photoshop CC, Adobe Illustrator CC Job Description: Full Page, 4 Color Ad Document Name: Bass ad / Fishing Regulations Guide - GA and various other states Final Trim Size: 7-7/8˝ X 10-1/2˝ Final Bleed: 8-1/8˝ X 10-13/16˝ Safety: 7˝ X 10˝ Date Created: 11/7/16 FISHING REGULATIONS GUIDE - GA TRIM: . 8˝ X 10-1/2˝ (AND VARIOUS OTHER STATES) BLEED: . 8-1/4˝ X 10-3/4˝ SAFETY: . 7˝ X 10˝ TRIM TRIM SAFETY TRIM BLEED BLEED SAFETY BLEED BLEED TRIM TRIM SAFETY SAFETY 2018 CONNECTICUT ANGLER’S GUIDE INLAND REGULATIONS INLAND & MARINE FISHING Easy two-step process: 1. Check the REGULATION TABLE (page 21) for general statewide Contents regulations. General Fishing Information 2. Look up the waterbody in the LAKE AND PONDS Directory of Services Phone Numbers .............................2 (pages 32–41) or RIVERS AND STREAMS (pages 44–52) Licenses .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut Watersheds
    Percent Impervious Surface Summaries for Watersheds CONNECTICUT WATERSHEDS Name Number Acres 1985 %IS 1990 %IS 1995 %IS 2002 %IS ABBEY BROOK 4204 4,927.62 2.32 2.64 2.76 3.02 ALLYN BROOK 4605 3,506.46 2.99 3.30 3.50 3.96 ANDRUS BROOK 6003 1,373.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.09 ANGUILLA BROOK 2101 7,891.33 3.13 3.50 3.78 4.29 ASH CREEK 7106 9,813.00 34.15 35.49 36.34 37.47 ASHAWAY RIVER 1003 3,283.88 3.89 4.17 4.41 4.96 ASPETUCK RIVER 7202 14,754.18 2.97 3.17 3.31 3.61 BALL POND BROOK 6402 4,850.50 3.98 4.67 4.87 5.10 BANTAM RIVER 6705 25,732.28 2.22 2.40 2.46 2.55 BARTLETT BROOK 3902 5,956.12 1.31 1.41 1.45 1.49 BASS BROOK 4401 6,659.35 19.10 20.97 21.72 22.77 BEACON HILL BROOK 6918 6,537.60 4.24 5.18 5.46 6.14 BEAVER BROOK 3802 5,008.24 1.13 1.22 1.24 1.27 BEAVER BROOK 3804 7,252.67 2.18 2.38 2.52 2.67 BEAVER BROOK 4803 5,343.77 0.88 0.93 0.94 0.95 BEAVER POND BROOK 6913 3,572.59 16.11 19.23 20.76 21.79 BELCHER BROOK 4601 5,305.22 6.74 8.05 8.39 9.36 BIGELOW BROOK 3203 18,734.99 1.40 1.46 1.51 1.54 BILLINGS BROOK 3605 3,790.12 1.33 1.48 1.51 1.56 BLACK HALL RIVER 4021 3,532.28 3.47 3.82 4.04 4.26 BLACKBERRY RIVER 6100 17,341.03 2.51 2.73 2.83 3.00 BLACKLEDGE RIVER 4707 16,680.11 2.82 3.02 3.16 3.34 BLACKWELL BROOK 3711 18,011.26 1.53 1.65 1.70 1.77 BLADENS RIVER 6919 6,874.43 4.70 5.57 5.79 6.32 BOG HOLLOW BROOK 6014 4,189.36 0.46 0.49 0.50 0.51 BOGGS POND BROOK 6602 4,184.91 7.22 7.78 8.41 8.89 BOOTH HILL BROOK 7104 3,257.81 8.54 9.36 10.02 10.55 BRANCH BROOK 6910 14,494.87 2.05 2.34 2.39 2.48 BRANFORD RIVER 5111 15,586.31 8.03 8.94 9.33 9.74
    [Show full text]
  • ORNL Report: Historical Non-Military Radium Sites Research Effort Addendum
    ENCLOSURE 3 Historical Non-Military Radium Sites Research Effort Addendum – Publicly Available Personally Identifiable Information – Withhold Under 10 CFR 2.390 Historical Non-Military Radium Sites Research Effort Addendum Prepared by Oak Ridge National Laboratory Under NRC Agreement Number 1886-V336-10 Job Code Number F1163 November 24, 2015 Prepared for U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards Personally Identifiable Information – Withhold Under 10 CFR 2.390 Personally Identifiable Information – Withhold Under 10 CFR 2.390 Table of Contents Aerospace Innovations: Site Summary ......................................................................................................... 3 Ansonia Electrical Company: Site Summary ................................................................................................. 6 Arrow Electric Company: Site Summary ..................................................................................................... 10 Battle Creek Sanitarium: Site Summary ...................................................................................................... 15 Benrus Clock Company: Site Summary ....................................................................................................... 24 Billings Army Navy: Site Summary .............................................................................................................. 32 Bryant Electric Company: Site Summary ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NPDES Phase 2 Stormwater Management Plan
    NPDES Phase 2 Stormwater Management Plan Prepared For: Town of Trumbull Trumbull, Connecticut October 18, 2012 Introduction Tighe&Bond Section 1 Introduction 1.1 Program Background In 1990, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) promulgated Phase I of its municipal stormwater program under the authority of the Clean Water Act (CWA). Phase I utilized National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit coverage to address stormwater runoff from large municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s) that served urbanized areas. The Stormwater Phase II Final Rule promulgated on December 8, 1999 requires MS4 operators in smaller urbanized areas to implement programs and practices aimed at controlling polluted stormwater runoff through the NPDES permit program. The EPA defines urbanized areas (UA) as “land comprising one or more places – central place(s) – and the adjacent densely settled surrounding area – urban fringe – that together have a residential population of at least 50,000 and an overall population density of at least 1,000 people per square mile”. Based upon this criteria, the Town of Trumbull is located entirely within an urbanized area. The program requires Phase II municipalities to develop a stormwater management plan outlining how the municipality intends to address the six minimum control measures set forth by EPA: ■ Public Education and Outreach ■ Public Involvement/Participation ■ Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination ■ Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Control ■ Post-Construction Stormwater Management in New Development and Redevelopment ■ Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations 1.2 Statewide General Permit The Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (CTDEEP) administers NPDES permitting in Connecticut and has issued a General Permit for the Discharge of Stormwater from Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4).
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut Fish Distribution Report2012
    Connecticut Fish Distribution Report 2012 Connecticut Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Bureau of Natural Resources Inland Fisheries Division 79 Elm Street, Hartford, CT 06106 860-424-3474 www.ct.gov/deep/fishing www.facebook.com/ctfishandwildlife The Connecticut Fish Distribution Report is published annually by the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection Daniel C. Esty, Commissioner Susan Whalen, Deputy Commissioner Bureau of Natural Resources William A. Hyatt, Chief Inland Fisheries Division Peter Aarrestad, Director 79 Elm Street Hartford, CT 06106-5127 860-424-FISH (3474) www.ct.gov/deep/fishing www.facebook.com/ctfishandwildlife Table of Contents Introduction 3 DEEP State Hatcheries 3 Connecticut’s Stocked Fish 4 Stocking Summary 2012 7 Fish Distribution Numbers 8 Catchable trout 8 Broodstock Atlantic salmon 18 Brown trout fry/fingerlings 18 Kokanee fry 18 Northern pike 19 Walleye 19 Channel catfish 19 Miscellaneous Diadromous Fish Stocking 20 (Atlantic salmon, brown trout, Shad, Alewife) Cover: Rearing tanks at the Quinebaug Valley State Trout Hatchery (top), a Seeforellen brown trout, from Kensington State Fish Hatchery being stocked (middle left-photo credit Bill Gerrish), channel catfish being unloaded and stocked (middle right-photo credit Neal Hagstrom), CT DEEP IFD trout stocking truck (lower left-photo credit Justin Wiggins), and a net of brown trout being removed from the rearing tank at the Burlington State Fish Hatchery and headed for the stocking truck (lower right-photo credit Bill Gerrish). The Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer that is committed to complying with the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Schenob Brook
    Sages Ravine Brook Schenob BrookSchenob Brook Housatonic River Valley Brook Moore Brook Connecticut River North Canaan Watchaug Brook Scantic RiverScantic River Whiting River Doolittle Lake Brook Muddy Brook Quinebaug River Blackberry River Hartland East Branch Salmon Brook Somers Union Colebrook East Branch Salmon Brook Lebanon Brook Fivemile RiverRocky Brook Blackberry RiverBlackberry River English Neighborhood Brook Sandy BrookSandy Brook Muddy Brook Freshwater Brook Ellis Brook Spruce Swamp Creek Connecticut River Furnace Brook Freshwater Brook Furnace Brook Suffield Scantic RiverScantic River Roaring Brook Bigelow Brook Salisbury Housatonic River Scantic River Gulf Stream Bigelow Brook Norfolk East Branch Farmington RiverWest Branch Salmon Brook Enfield Stafford Muddy BrookMuddy Brook Factory Brook Hollenbeck River Abbey Brook Roaring Brook Woodstock Wangum Lake Brook Still River Granby Edson BrookEdson Brook Thompson Factory Brook Still River Stony Brook Stony Brook Stony Brook Crystal Lake Brook Wangum Lake Brook Middle RiverMiddle River Sucker BrookSalmon Creek Abbey Brook Salmon Creek Mad RiverMad River East Granby French RiverFrench River Hall Meadow Brook Willimantic River Barkhamsted Connecticut River Fenton River Mill Brook Salmon Creek West Branch Salmon Brook Connecticut River Still River Salmon BrookSalmon Brook Thompson Brook Still River Canaan Brown Brook Winchester Broad BrookBroad Brook Bigelow Brook Bungee Brook Little RiverLittle River Fivemile River West Branch Farmington River Windsor Locks Willimantic River First
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut Sea Grant Project Report
    1 CONNECTICUT SEA GRANT PROJECT REPORT Please complete this progress or final report form and return by the date indicated in the emailed progress report request from the Connecticut Sea Grant College Program. Fill in the requested information using your word processor (i.e., Microsoft Word), and e-mail the completed form to Dr. Syma Ebbin [email protected], Research Coordinator, Connecticut Sea Grant College Program. Do NOT mail or fax hard copies. Please try to address the specific sections below. If applicable, you can attach files of electronic publications when you return the form. If you have questions, please call Syma Ebbin at (860) 405-9278. Please fill out all of the following that apply to your specific research or development project. Pay particular attention to goals, accomplishments, benefits, impacts and publications, where applicable. Project #: __R/CE-34-CTNY__ Check one: [ ] Progress Report [ x ] Final report Duration (dates) of entire project, including extensions: From [March 1, 2013] to [August 28, 2015 ]. Project Title or Topic: Comparative analysis and model development for determining the susceptibility to eutrophication of Long Island Sound embayment. Principal Investigator(s) and Affiliation(s): 1. Jamie Vaudrey, Department of Marine Sciences, University of Connecticut 2. Charles Yarish, Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Department of Marine Sciences, University of Connecticut 3. Jang Kyun Kim, Department of Marine Sciences, University of Connecticut 4. Christopher Pickerell, Marine Program, Cornell Cooperative Extension of Suffolk County 5. Lorne Brousseau, Marine Program, Cornell Cooperative Extension of Suffolk County A. COLLABORATORS AND PARTNERS: (List any additional organizations or partners involved in the project.) Justin Eddings, Marine Program, Cornell Cooperative Extension of Suffolk County Michael Sautkulis, Cornell Cooperative Extension of Suffolk County Veronica Ortiz, University of Connecticut Jeniam Foundation (Tripp Killin, Exec.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Flow Rivers in Connecticut Compiled by Rivers Alliance of Connecticut
    Low Flow Rivers in Connecticut Compiled by Rivers Alliance of Connecticut The following water courses have been identified impaired or threatened by low flows in part or in their entirety. The list was first compiled in 2002, primarily from DEP documents. Subsequently, the DEP stopped reporting the “threatened” category, so these entries cannot be updated readily. The underlined entries have been listed as impaired. We are in the process of rechecking entries. More information available on request. Southeast Coastal Drainage Area: Copps Brook (2102)! ---- 303(d)2 list of 1996, 1998,2002, 2004 & 305(b) list 2008 Tributary to Copps Brook (2102), 305(b) list 2008. Williams Brook (2103) --- DEP report3 Whitford Brook (2104), Ledyard --- DEP report, 303(d) list of 2002 & 2004, 305(b) list 2008 Latimer Brook (2202) --- DEP report Patagansett River (2205) --- 303(d) list of 2002 Bride Brook (2206) --- 303(d) lists of 19984 2002 & 2004, DEP report, 305(d) list 2008 Thames River Watershed: Fenton River (3207) -- DEP report, 303(d) of 2002, 305(b) list 2008; candidate for removal Oxoboxo Brook and Rockland Pond (3004), Montville --- DEP report, 303(d) 1998 & 2002 Quinebaug River (3700), MA to Shetucket River --- 303(d) 1998 & 2002; 305(b) list 2006 & 2008 Shetucket River (3800), Scotland -- 303(d) 1998 & 2002 Connecticut River Watershed: Scantic River (4200), Enfield -- 303(d) 1998 Farmington River (4300) Sandy Brook to W. Branch Reservoir -- 303(d) of 2002 & 2008 Mad River (4302), Winchester -- 303(d) 2008 Farmington River, East Branch* (4308)
    [Show full text]
  • U N S U U S E U R a C S
    HAMPSHIRE MONTGOMERY CLAVERACK HILLSDALE SOUTHAMPTON Holyoke W OTIS est Lake Garfield fiel MONTEREY Benton Pond d River Blair Pond Lake GREAT BARRINGTON Buel BLANDFORD EGREMONT 109th Congress of the UnitedLower Spectacle Pond States RUSSELL LIVINGSTON Threemile Pond Otis Reservoir Westfield necticut West Copake Lake West Lake Con R iver TAGHKANIC Springfield Mill Pond Borden Brook Reservoir WEST SPRINGFIELD Noyes Pond COLUMBIA COPAKE HAMPDEN MOUNT SHEFFIELD WASHINGTON NEW MARLBOROUGH SANDISFIELD TOLLAND GRANVILLE Agawam GALLATIN BERKSHIRE SOUTHWICK MASSACHUSETTS ANCRAM Canaan S Benedict CONNECTICUT t H Pond W 7 w e Congamond s y Wood Creek t Twin Lake 2 B Lake 7 Pond r NORTH CANAAN 2 a Riga ( n North N Lake c o h S r t t h R H Doolittle Granby S e S w Lake S t s t ) t H y H e 4 w w S r 1 y South P C y t v ( a H o 2 o n lk R 1 n U a an Norfo d ir 0 d 8 w n 3 COLEBROOK SALISBURY y d ( e C 8 r o ( M C DISTRICT d l n R e o o a a b 0 HARTLAND l u r y 2 n e SUFFIELD a o w n C b 539 o tH wy r t r tH 2 k o S i S a in Rd) S ( 44 R o o a StHwy 168 i StHwy 126 nt t n B v u H k d o r M e ( R ) w StHwy 182 e 7 Suffield l R d s d d y 8 e e ) R i 1 1 Depot v R n e 8 n y d r 9 S a e w R t ( a t G s H ) n Wangum d r Manitook Lake t m NORFOLK ) a a S Lake a n C b Pine h y k StHwy 179 R NEW YORK r GRANBY d a MILAN ) 5 Plains 44 B 7 y CONNECTICUT w S S H t a t H l PINE PLAINS m S CANAAN w y o n 1 Salmon Wononskopomuc ) 8 StHwy 20 B d 1 r Lake S Brook o StHwy 126 tH R o w ld k St y e S H fi StHwy 219 wy Millerton 6 t 20 3 h c ( t Hu i nt L sv ( ill StHwy
    [Show full text]