DOCSLIB.ORG

Volume 2 APPENDIX E.09 CULTURAL RESOURCES and HISTORIC PROPERTIES – ERRATA SHEET

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Volume 2 APPENDIX E.09 CULTURAL RESOURCES and HISTORIC PROPERTIES – ERRATA SHEET Appendix E.09 Cultural Resources and Historic Properties Tier 1 Final EIS Volume 2 APPENDIX E.09 CULTURAL RESOURCES AND HISTORIC PROPERTIES – ERRATA SHEET Incorrect Tier 1 Draft EIS Text/Table Tier 1 Final EIS Text/Table (Volume 2) Page Description Page 1. 3-32 Resource counts were updated for Environmental Consequences for Data Matrices two NHLs: The Woodlands in Philadelphia, PA and College Hill Historic District in Providence, RI as a result of data refinement. 2. 7 Alternative 1 Environmental Consequences in New London County, Data Matrices CT was changed. The NHL Old Lyme Historic District now reads: new ROW-aerial. 3. 35-68 Affected Environment and Context Area data were updated based Data Matrices on a manual analysis of NHL locations reported on the NPS database for the existing NEC and each Action Alternative. Refining these data resulted in only minor property count changes that do not change the outcome of the FEIS. Tier 1 Final EIS P a g e | 1 Volume 2 Cultural Resources and Historic Properties Effects Assessment Methodology February 28, 2014 Version Final Revised October 3, 2015 Submitted by: Cultural Resources and Historic Properties Effects Assessment Methodology Table of Contents 1. CULTURAL RESOURCES AND HISTORIC PROPERTIES EFFECTS ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ........................ 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 DEFINITIONS............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 RELATED RESOURCES .................................................................................................................................. 2 1.4 AGENCY AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ........................................................................................................ 2 1.4.1 Regulatory Compliance ..................................................................................................................... 4 1.5 METHODOLOGY TO ASSESS EFFECTS ............................................................................................................... 5 1.5.1 Existing Conditions ........................................................................................................................... 5 1.5.2 Environmental Consequences ........................................................................................................... 7 1.5.3 Mitigation Strategies ........................................................................................................................ 8 1.6 TIER 1 EIS OUTCOMES................................................................................................................................ 8 1.7 APPLICABILITY TO TIER 2 ASSESSMENTS ........................................................................................................... 9 Tables TABLE 1: RELATED RESOURCE INPUTS TO CULTURAL RESOURCES AND HISTORIC PROPERTIES ASSESSMENT ................. 2 TABLE 2: MANAGEMENT AND REGULATION OF CULTURAL RESOURCES AND HISTORIC PROPERTIES* .......................... 3 TABLE 3: DATA SOURCES FOR THE EVALUATION OF CULTURAL RESOURCES AND HISTORIC RESOURCES ....................... 6 P a g e | i last update: 10/3/2015 Version Final Cultural Resources and Historic Properties Effects Assessment Methodology 1. Cultural Resources and Historic Properties Effects Assessment Methodology 1.1 INTRODUCTION This methodology explains how the potential effects of the Tier 1 EIS Alternatives on cultural resources and historic properties will be addressed in the NEC FUTURE Tier 1 EIS. Specific details regarding compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) is documented in the NEC FUTURE Section 106 Strategy and Section 106 Strategy: Approach to Conduct Government-to-Government Consultation with Federally Recognized Indian Tribes. This methodology presents the regulatory framework, involved government agencies, expected approvals and other outcomes of the Tier 1 EIS process and relevance to Tier 2, project-level assessments. It also identifies data sources, metrics and methods to be used to document existing conditions and analyze environmental consequences. This methodology may be revised as the NEC FUTURE program advances and new information is available. 1.2 DEFINITIONS Topic areas covered in this methodology include: 4 Cultural Resources: Federal agencies are required, under NEPA [40 CFR § 1508.8] and the NHPA [16 USC 470 et seq.], to consider the effects of a project on historic and cultural resources. Specifically, 40 CFR § 1508.27(b)(8) states that agencies must take into account “the degree to which the action may adversely affect districts, sites, highways, structures, or objects listed in or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP or National Register) or may cause loss or destruction of significant scientific, cultural, or historical resources.” The NEPA term “cultural resources” includes all resources included within the Section 106 definition of “historic properties,” (see below) as well as additional resources such as sacred sites, archaeological sites not eligible for the NRHP, and archaeological collections.1 4 Historic Properties: Section 106 of the NHPA (16 USC 470f) regulations define the term “historic property” as “any prehistoric or historic district, site, building, structure, or object included in or eligible for inclusion in the NRHP. This term includes artifacts, records, and material remains that are related to and located within such properties. The term includes properties of religious and cultural importance to an Indian Tribe or Native Hawaiian organization and that meet the National Register criteria.” [36 CFR n§ 800.16(l)(1)] 4 Native American/Tribal Properties: Section 101 of the NHPA states, “Properties of religious and cultural significance to Indian Tribes may be determined to be eligible for inclusion on the National Register” [16 U.S.C. 470a(d)(6(A)] 1 CEQ and ACHP: NEPA and NHPA: A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and Section 106, 2013 p. 4. P a g e | 1 last update: 10/3/2015 Version Final Cultural Resources and Historic Properties Effects Assessment Methodology 1.3 RELATED RESOURCES The effects assessment from certain other resources evaluated as part of the Tier 1 EIS will contribute to the assessment of effects on cultural resources and historic properties. These related resources are identified in Table 1. Note that the effects assessments for those related resources will be documented within their respective Tier 1 EIS sections. Table 1: Related Resource Inputs to Cultural Resources and Historic Properties Assessment Resource Input to Cultural Resources and Historic Properties Assessment Visual & Aesthetic Effects assessment on visual and aesthetic quality and resources in relation to the NRHP listed resources Noise & Vibration Effects assessment and identification of areas where noise and vibration thresholds are exceeded in relation to the NRHP listed resources Source: NEC FUTURE JV Team, 2013 Effects documented for Cultural Resources and Historic Properties will also be considered in the assessment of Section 4(f) resources. 1.4 AGENCY AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK Cultural resources and historic properties are subject to regulation by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) and the National Park Service (NPS) under the provisions of the NHPA. Federally recognized Indian tribes (represented either by tribal representatives or Tribal Historic Preservation Officers (THPOs) have jurisdiction over cultural resources on Indian reservations and dependent Indian communities, and under NHPA, require consultation with federal agencies for projects off tribal lands that may be located on their ancestral homelands. In considering project impacts, federal agencies are required to consult with the appropriate State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and provide the ACHP an opportunity to comment on the undertaking. In the evaluation of cultural resources and historic properties for NEC FUTURE, the FRA will consider legislation and regulations, listed in Table 2, consistent with a Tier 1 level of assessment. P a g e | 2 last update: 10/3/2015 Version Final Cultural Resources and Historic Properties Effects Assessment Methodology Table 2: Management and Regulation of Cultural Resources and Historic Properties* Federal & State Agencies Regulatory Oversight Description of Regulation Regulated Resource Advisory Council National Historic Preservation NHPA established ACHP Cultural resources, on Historic Act of 1966 (NHPA) as the policy advisor and historic properties, Preservation organization that tribal areas handles dispute resolution National Park National Historic Preservation NHPA established National Register Service Act of 1966 nominations and listings Sites, National process for the National Historic Landmarks Register of Historic Places U.S Department Section 4(f) of the Department Section 4(f0 established Historic properties of of Transportation Act of 1966 categories of resources Transportation to be protected from use for transportation projects. DC The Historic Landmark and State regulation and Cultural resources, Historic District Protection Act protection of resources historic properties, of 1978, D.C. Law 2-144 tribal areas Maryland The Maryland Historical Trust State regulation and Cultural resources, Act of 1985, as amended,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • “From the Cracks in the Sidewalks of NYC”: The
    “From the Cracks in the Sidewalks of N.Y.C.”: The Embodied Production of Urban Decline, Survival, and Renewal in New York’s Fiscal-Crisis-Era Streets, 1977-1983 by Elizabeth Healy Matassa B.A. in Italian and French Studies, May 2003, University of Delaware M.A. in Geography, May 2006, Louisiana State University A Dissertation submitted to The Faculty of The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 31, 2014 Dissertation directed by Suleiman Osman Associate Professor of American Studies The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of the George Washington University certifies that Elizabeth Healy Matassa has passed the Final Examination for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy as of August 21, 2013. This is the final and approved form of the dissertation. “From the Cracks in the Sidewalks of N.Y.C.”: The Embodied Production of Decline, Survival, and Renewal in New York’s Fiscal-Crisis-Era Streets, 1977-1983 Elizabeth Healy Matassa Dissertation Research Committee: Suleiman Osman, Associate Professor of American Studies, Dissertation Director Elaine Peña, Associate Professor of American Studies, Committee Member Elizabeth Chacko, Associate Professor of Geography and International Affairs, Committee Member ii ©Copyright 2013 by Elizabeth Healy Matassa All rights reserved iii Dedication The author wishes to dedicate this dissertation to the five boroughs. From Woodlawn to the Rockaways: this one’s for you. iv Abstract of Dissertation “From the Cracks in the Sidewalks of N.Y.C.”: The Embodied Production of Urban Decline, Survival, and Renewal in New York’s Fiscal-Crisis-Era Streets, 1977-1983 This dissertation argues that New York City’s 1970s fiscal crisis was not only an economic crisis, but was also a spatial and embodied one.
    [Show full text]
  • Landmarks Preservation Commission March 24, 2009, Designation List 411 LP-2311 NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN MUSEUM
    Landmarks Preservation Commission March 24, 2009, Designation List 411 LP-2311 NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN MUSEUM (now LIBRARY) BUILDING, FOUNTAIN OF LIFE, and TULIP TREE ALLEE, Watson Drive and Garden Way, New York Botanical Garden, Bronx Park, the Bronx; Museum Building designed 1896, built 1898-1901, Robert W. Gibson, architect; Fountain 1901-05, Carl (Charles) E. Tefft, sculptor, Gibson, architect; Allee planted 1903-11. Landmark Site: Borough of the Bronx Tax Map 3272, Lot 1 in part, consisting of the property bounded by a line that corresponds to the outermost edges of the rear (eastern) portion of the original 1898-1901 Museum (now Library) Building (excluding the International Plant Science Center, Harriet Barnes Pratt Library Wing, and Jeannette Kittredge Watson Science and Education Building), the southernmost edge of the original Museum (now Library) Building (excluding the Annex) and a line extending southwesterly to Garden Way, the eastern curbline of Garden Way to a point on a line extending southwesterly from the northernmost edge of the original Museum (now Library) Building, and northeasterly along said line and the northernmost edge of the original Museum (now Library) Building, to the point of beginning. On October 28, 2008, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the New York Botanical Garden Museum (now Library) Building, Fountain of Life, and Tulip Tree Allee and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 5). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Six people spoke in favor of designation, including representatives of the New York Botanical Garden, Municipal Art Society of New York, Historic Districts Council, Metropolitan Chapter of the Victorian Society in America, and New York Landmarks Conservancy.
    [Show full text]
  • Smithsonian Institution Archives (SIA)
    SMITHSONIAN OPPORTUNITIES FOR RESEARCH AND STUDY 2020 Office of Fellowships and Internships Smithsonian Institution Washington, DC The Smithsonian Opportunities for Research and Study Guide Can be Found Online at http://www.smithsonianofi.com/sors-introduction/ Version 2.0 (Updated January 2020) Copyright © 2020 by Smithsonian Institution Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 How to Use This Book .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Anacostia Community Museum (ACM) ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 Archives of American Art (AAA) ....................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Asian Pacific American Center (APAC) .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Center for Folklife and Cultural Heritage (CFCH) ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Cooper-Hewitt,
    [Show full text]
  • American Architecture: from Bungalow to Bauhaus Art 1630H Yeshiva College Spring 2016
    American Architecture: From Bungalow to Bauhaus Art 1630H Yeshiva College Spring 2016 S Y L L A B U S By comparing buildings from different eras and from different cultures, we shall learn about the diverse traditions of American architecture, from its colonial beginnings to post-modern practices. The result will be the basis for an architectural vocabulary and a greater consciousness of the built environment. We shall examine what the first colonists found, what they created, and what they brought with them from Europe. Thus, observations on numerous references to roots in European design will bring us to an initial definition of the nature of American architecture. We shall develop an understanding of the vigor and innovations of its building arts. We shall examine not only work of the masters of the discipline, but also architecture without architects. This introductory course will include lecture, discussion, critical written analysis, and oral presentations by each class member. Frequent visits to architectural sites will highlight materials, form, ornamentation, and context. Meeting times Tuesday, 6:45-9:15 p.m. (May occasionally run until 9:45 p.m.) Furst Hall Instructor Paul Glassman, M. Arch., M.B.A. Telephone 917.434.0954 (cell) Electronic mail [email protected] General course requirements Attendance at all but one class is required; each additional absence will lower your grade by 1/3 (e. g., A- to B+). Three absences will result in a reduction by one full letter (e. g., A- to B-). Four absences will result in a failing grade (F). Please notify the instructor via e-mail in advance of the class you will be missing.
    [Show full text]
  • Landmarks Preservation Commission November 22, 2016, Designation List 490 LP-2579
    Landmarks Preservation Commission November 22, 2016, Designation List 490 LP-2579 YALE CLUB OF NEW YORK CITY 50 Vanderbilt Avenue (aka 49-55 East 44th Street), Manhattan Built 1913-15; architect, James Gamble Rogers Landmark site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 1279, Lot 28 On September 13, 2016, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation of the Yale Club of New York City and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site. The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with provisions of law. Six people spoke in support of designation, including representatives of the Yale Club of New York City, Manhattan Borough President Gale A. Brewer, Historic Districts Council, New York Landmarks Conservancy, and the Municipal Art Society of New York. The Real Estate Board of New York submitted written testimony in opposition to designation. State Senator Brad Hoylman submitted written testimony in support of designation. Summary The Yale Club of New York City is a Renaissance Revival-style skyscraper at the northwest corner of Vanderbilt Avenue and East 44th Street. For more than a century it has played an important role in East Midtown, serving the Yale community and providing a handsome and complementary backdrop to Grand Central Terminal. Constructed on property that was once owned by the New York Central Railroad, it stands directly above two levels of train tracks and platforms. This was the ideal location to build the Yale Club, opposite the new terminal, which serves New Haven, where Yale University is located, and at the east end of “clubhouse row.” The architect was James Gamble Rogers, who graduated from Yale College in 1889 and attended the Ecole des Beaux Arts in Paris during the 1890s.
    [Show full text]
  • To Enlarge the Map
    THE EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF VIRGINIA Northern 522 Piedmont North Fairfax Winchester Church of the Holy Cross, Dunn Loring (1) 15 Epiphany Episcopal, Oak Hill (2) Church of the Christ Church, Holy Comforter, Vienna (3) Arlington Shenandoah Valley 81 Good Shepherd, Lucketts St. Anne’s, Reston (4) Westminster-Canterbury La Iglesia de Cristo Rey (1) Bluemont St. Peter’s, St. Dunstan’s, McLean (5) 8 La Iglesia de San Jose (2) Grace Church, Purcellville St. James’, St. Francis, Great Falls (6) Leesburg St. Andrew’s (3) Christ Church, Winchester Berryville St. Francis Korean, McLean (7) St. George’s (4) 7 St. John’s, McLean (8) 6 3 St. John’s (5) St. Paul’s Church-on-the-Hill, St. Mary’s, St. Gabriel’s, St. Thomas, McLean (9) St. Mary’s (6) Winchester Berryville St. Timothy’s, Herndon (10) 7 Leesburg 66 St. Michael’s (7) Cunningham St. David’s, 2/4 St. Peter’s (8) Chapel Parish, Ashburn Trinity (9) Millwood Trinity, Upperville St. Matthew’s, Sterling Meade Memorial, White Post 6 Emmanuel, Middleburg 50 1/5 66 Church of Our Redeemer, 7 9 Leeds, Aldie 8 Alexandria Markham 9 Southern 340 Emmanuel, Delaplane 10 4 5/7 Christ Church (1) 1 7 395 Church of St. Clement (2) Calvary Church, Front Royal 3 11 Shenandoah Grace, The Plains 2 Church of the Resurrection (3) St. Andrew’s, 8 3 2 5 Marshall 11 Emmanuel (4) Valley St. Paul’s, Haymarket 4 2/9 Grace (5) Cathedral Shrine of the 6 10 66 1 Immanuel Church-on-the-Hill (6) Transfiguration, Orkney Springs 12 7 1 4 10 4 2/4 3 Meade Memorial (7) Culpeper 29 7 St.
    [Show full text]
  • CENTURY APARTMENTS, 25 Central Park West, Borough of Manhattan
    Landmarks Preservation Commission July 9, 1985, Designation List 181 LP-1517 CENTURY APARTMENTS, 25 Central Park West, Borough of Manhattan. Built 1931; architect Irwin S. Chanin. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 1115, Lot 29. On September 11, 1984, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Century Apartments and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 11). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Thirteen witnesses spoke in favor of designation. There were no speakers in opposition to designation. DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS The Century Apartments, extending along the entire blockfront of Central Park West between West 62nd Street to West 63rd Street, anchors the southern end of one of New York City's finest residential boulevards. With twin towers rising 300 feet from the street, this building is one of a small group of related structures that help give Central Park West its distinctive silhouette. Designed in 1930 by Irwin S. Chanin of the Chanin Construction Company, the Century Apartments is among the most sophisticated residential Art Deco buildings in New York and is a major work by one of America's pioneering Art Deco designers. Built in 1931, the Century was among the last buildings erected as part of the early 20th-century redevelopment of Central Park West. Central Park West, a continuation of Eighth Avenue, runs along the western edge of Central Park. Development along this prime avenue occurred very slowly , lagging sub­ stantially behind the general development of the Upper West Side.
    [Show full text]
  • Y\5$ in History
    THE GARGOYLES OF SAN FRANCISCO: MEDIEVALIST ARCHITECTURE IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA 1900-1940 A thesis submitted to the faculty of San Francisco State University A5 In partial fulfillment of The Requirements for The Degree Mi ST Master of Arts . Y\5$ In History by James Harvey Mitchell, Jr. San Francisco, California May, 2016 Copyright by James Harvey Mitchell, Jr. 2016 CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL I certify that I have read The Gargoyles of San Francisco: Medievalist Architecture in Northern California 1900-1940 by James Harvey Mitchell, Jr., and that in my opinion this work meets the criteria for approving a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in History at San Francisco State University. <2 . d. rbel Rodriguez, lessor of History Philip Dreyfus Professor of History THE GARGOYLES OF SAN FRANCISCO: MEDIEVALIST ARCHITECTURE IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA 1900-1940 James Harvey Mitchell, Jr. San Francisco, California 2016 After the fire and earthquake of 1906, the reconstruction of San Francisco initiated a profusion of neo-Gothic churches, public buildings and residential architecture. This thesis examines the development from the novel perspective of medievalism—the study of the Middle Ages as an imaginative construct in western society after their actual demise. It offers a selection of the best known neo-Gothic artifacts in the city, describes the technological innovations which distinguish them from the medievalist architecture of the nineteenth century, and shows the motivation for their creation. The significance of the California Arts and Crafts movement is explained, and profiles are offered of the two leading medievalist architects of the period, Bernard Maybeck and Julia Morgan.
    [Show full text]
  • Search Titles and Presenters at Past AAHN Conferences from 1984
    American Association for the History of Nursing, Inc. 10200 W. 44th Avenue, Suite 304 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Phone: (303) 422-2685 Fax: (303) 422-8894 [email protected] www.aahn.org Titles and Presenters at Past AAHN Conferences 1984 – 2010 Papers remain the intellectual property of the researchers and are not available through the AAHN. 2010 Co-sponsor: Royal Holloway, University of London, England September 14 - 16, 2010 London, England Photo Album Conference Podcasts The following podcasts are available for download by right-clicking on the talk required and selecting "Save target/link as ..." Fiona Ross: Conference Welcome [28Mb-28m31s] Mark Bostridge: A Florence Nightingale for the 21st Century [51Mb-53m29s] Lynn McDonald: The Nightingale system of training and its influence worldwide [13Mb-13m34s] Carol Helmstadter: Nightingale Training in Context [15Mb-16m42s] Judith Godden: The Power of the Ideal: How the Nightingale System shaped modern nursing [17Mb-18m14s] Barbra Mann-Wall: Nuns, Nightingale and Nursing [15Mb-15m36s] Dr Afaf Meleis: Nursing Connections Past and Present: A Global Perspective [58Mb-61m00s] 2009 Co-sponsor: School of Nursing, University of Minnesota September 24 - 27, 2009 Minneapolis, Minnesota Paper Presentations Protecting and Healing the Physical Wound: Control of Wound Infection in the First World War Christine Hallett ―A Silent but Serious Struggle Against the Sisters‖: Working-Class German Men in Nursing, 1903- 1934 Aeleah Soine, PhDc The Ties that Bind: Tale of Urban Health Work in Philadelphia‘s Black Belt, 1912-1922 J. Margo Brooks Carthon, PhD, RN, APN-BC The Cow Question: Solving the TB Problem in Chicago, 1903-1920 Wendy Burgess, PhD, RN ―Pioneers In Preventative Health‖: The Work of The Chicago Mts.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 78, No. 247/Tuesday, December 24, 2013
    77710 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 247 / Tuesday, December 24, 2013 / Notices CONCID Concessioner Park unit YELL131–04 ..... Hell’s A-Roarin’ Outfitters, Inc ................................................... Yellowstone National Park. YELL132–04 ..... Nine Quarter Circle Ranch, Inc ................................................. Yellowstone National Park. YELL134–04 ..... Dave Hettinger Outfitting ........................................................... Yellowstone National Park. YELL137–04 ..... R.K. Miller’s Wilderness Pack Trips, Inc ................................... Yellowstone National Park. YELL138–04 ..... Yellowstone Roughriders, LLC ................................................. Yellowstone National Park. YELL139–04 ..... Hoof Beat Recreational Services .............................................. Yellowstone National Park. YELL140–04 ..... Black Otter, Inc ......................................................................... Yellowstone National Park. YELL141–04 ..... Lost Fork Ranch ........................................................................ Yellowstone National Park. YELL144–04 ..... Lone Mountain Ranch, Inc ........................................................ Yellowstone National Park. YELL145–04 ..... Dollar, Inc .................................................................................. Yellowstone National Park. YELL146–04 ..... K Bar Z Guest Ranch and Outfitters, LLC ................................ Yellowstone National Park. YELL147–04 ..... Yellowstone Outfitters ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Telling Guilford's Story: Report on Interpretation and Signage
    December 31, 2013 Telling Guilford’s Story Report on Interpretation and Signage Prepared for the Heritage Tourism Initiative of the Guilford Preservation Alliance Nancy I. M. Morgan, Ph.D. Point Heritage Development Consulting Jeffrey Dawson Dawson Associates Carolyn Brackett National Trust for Historic Preservation This project was made possible through generous support from the Connecticut Humanities Council and the Guilford Foundation. Contents Project Background 1 Introduction 1 Telling Guilford’s Story: Project Scope 2 Summary of Meetings 2 Elisabeth C. Adams Middle School Meeting 2 Information Kiosk Meeting 3 Historical Experts Meeting 3 Guilford Community Meeting 5 Heritage Tourism Initiative Meeting 6 Telling Guilford’s Story 8 A Thematic Framework 9 Theme 1 9 Theme 2 11 Theme 3 13 Theme 4 16 A Selected Bibliography for Telling Guilford’s Stories 19 Identifying Target Audiences for Guilford’s Heritage Tourism Experience 21 Section Overview: Identifying Target Audiences 21 Current Traveler Profile 22 Potential Target Audiences for Guilford 27 Signing Guilford 29 Site Visit 29 Survey of Existing Conditions 31 Summary of Challenges and Opportunities 41 Examples from Other Communities 43 Maps 45 Telling Guilford’s Story A Report on Interpretation and Signage Project Background Introduction Guilford is a vibrant historic community that fronts the Long Island Sound and stretches into the rolling Connecticut farmland of New Haven County. The town is blessed with a history that stretches nearly four centuries into the past, the Guilford Green and architecture that define an incredible sense of place, and forward-looking citizens who appreciate the town’s legacy and are thoughtfully building upon it.
    [Show full text]
  • SCOREBOARD Basketball
    20—MANCHESTER HERALD. Monday. March 4.1991 SCOREBOARD TUESDAY Royd 1-2, Wood 52), Los Angslaa 2-10 (DIvac 24, Alabama 30) dki not play. NExt: vs. (Instigator, fighting), 13:53; Nolan, Qua, rnidor 1-1, Wbrthy 16, EJohnaon 51, ParMna 51, Florida at Naahvll, j, Tsnn, Friday. (fightaig), 13:53; Sokic, Qua (hooking), 1536; Tstiola 51, Scott 06). Foulad out-Nons. 25. Virginia (2310) did not play. NExt va. Hockey Gmis, QuE (charging), 1 6 3 8 Coif Basketball Rabounda—Houston 62 (1-Smith 22), Los An- Wbka ForEst at Chartotts, N C.. Frkfoy. Third PEriod—8 QuEbEc, Hough 10 (Hikoc, galas S3 (Worthy 10). AaaUts—Houaton 13 Sakic), 1362 (pp). 6, QuEbEc, M lEr 4 (Sakic, LOCAL NEWS INSIDE How women’s Top 25 fared Hough), 19:34. PEnaltiEs—JEnnings, Har (Maxwal. tCSmito. F l^ 13), Los AngoIss 24 Doral Open scores NBA standings (EJohnaon 8). Total touls-Houaton 23. Los How IhE AssociatEd PrEss' Top 25 womEn's NHL standings (rougNng), 136; Raglan, QuE, doubla minor Angaiss 20. Tachnicals—Houaton illogal Mam s farEd Sunday: W ALES CO N FER EN CE (rougNng), 136; Brown, Hor (unaportsmaNIkE MIAMI (AP) — Full and partial acor^ Sunday i A m i M C O N FE R E N C E dsfonaa 3, Los Angalaa Bagal datartas. Wordy. P a trick D iv isio n condiict), 239; Qillip QuE (unaportamaNHw during thE lightning-suspEndEd ktorth round of ■ Parkade subdivision approved. AtlMUeDIvtaton 1. Virginia (27-2) lost to dam son 65-62. A— 17,506. 2. Pann StatE (231) did not play.
    [Show full text]