Y\5$ in History

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Y\5$ in History THE GARGOYLES OF SAN FRANCISCO: MEDIEVALIST ARCHITECTURE IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA 1900-1940 A thesis submitted to the faculty of San Francisco State University A5 In partial fulfillment of The Requirements for The Degree Mi ST Master of Arts . Y\5$ In History by James Harvey Mitchell, Jr. San Francisco, California May, 2016 Copyright by James Harvey Mitchell, Jr. 2016 CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL I certify that I have read The Gargoyles of San Francisco: Medievalist Architecture in Northern California 1900-1940 by James Harvey Mitchell, Jr., and that in my opinion this work meets the criteria for approving a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in History at San Francisco State University. <2 . d. rbel Rodriguez, lessor of History Philip Dreyfus Professor of History THE GARGOYLES OF SAN FRANCISCO: MEDIEVALIST ARCHITECTURE IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA 1900-1940 James Harvey Mitchell, Jr. San Francisco, California 2016 After the fire and earthquake of 1906, the reconstruction of San Francisco initiated a profusion of neo-Gothic churches, public buildings and residential architecture. This thesis examines the development from the novel perspective of medievalism—the study of the Middle Ages as an imaginative construct in western society after their actual demise. It offers a selection of the best known neo-Gothic artifacts in the city, describes the technological innovations which distinguish them from the medievalist architecture of the nineteenth century, and shows the motivation for their creation. The significance of the California Arts and Crafts movement is explained, and profiles are offered of the two leading medievalist architects of the period, Bernard Maybeck and Julia Morgan. The thesis concludes with a discussion of the ill-fated attempt to create a museum for medieval arts in the City, inspired by William Randoph Hearst's donation of a monastery building imported from Spain. I certify that the Abstract is a correct representation of the content of this thesis. <~ > — ILe? ■ i <-e> Chair, Thesis Committee ^ Date ACKNOWLEDGMENT Heartfelt thanks to the professors in the History Department of San Francisco State University for their bountiful support and encouragement, in particular to Richard Hoffman, Barbara Loomis, Trevor Getz, Jessica Elkind-Breitenecher, and Philip Dreyfus. My special thanks to Jarbel Rodriguez, whose graduate seminar on medievalism inspired the present thesis. v TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures..................................................................................................................... ix Introduction......................................................................................................................... 1 Historical Background..........................................................................................3 What Revival? Whose Gothic? Which Medieval?......................................... 6 Medieval San Francisco.....................................................................................12 California Arts and Crafts.................................................................................20 New Buildings after the Earthquake..............................................................31 Churches..............................................................................................................................33 Grace Episcopal Cathedral................................................................................33 St. Dominic's Catholic Church......................................................................... 43 Trinity Episcopal Church..................................................................................46 First Unitarian Church.......................................................................................48 Notre Dame des Victoires..................................................................................51 St. John the Evangelist Episcopal Church..................................................... 54 St. Brigid Catholic Church and Sacred Heart Church................................55 First Church of Christ Scientist, Berkeley..................................................... 57 The Swedenborgian Church............................................................................ 59 Public and Residential Architecture............................................................................. 63 The San Francisco Armory............................................................................... 64 San Francisco Art Institute............................................................................... 68 Russ Building and Cathedral Building, Oakland........................................69 Green's Eye Hospital..........................................................................................73 Sharon Arts Building.......................................................................................... 74 Masonic Temple.................................................................................................. 76 Residential Architecture....................................................................................78 Two Leading Medievalist Architects............................................................................ 81 Bernard Maybeck................................................................................................ 81 Julia Morgan.........................................................................................................90 The San Francisco Museum of Medieval Art..............................................................95 Santa Maria de Ovila.........................................................................................96 Wyntoon Estate.................................................................................................119 Planning the New Museum...........................................................................123 End of the Dream............................................................................................. 131 The Gargoyles of San Francisco..................................................................................137 Appendix..........................................................................................................................139 Bibliography.....................................................................................................................157 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Medieval masque, Bohemian Grove, 1909.......................................................139 2. Main Entrance, San Quentin Prison...................................................................140 3. Title page, The Simple Home................................................................................. 141 4. Charles Keeler, 1895..............................................................................................142 5. Bodley's design for Grace Cathedral, exterior..................................................143 6. Bodley's design for Grace Cathedral, interior...................................................144 7. Maybeck and family, ca. 1910............................................................................. 145 8. Wyntoon Estate ca. 1902-03................................................................................. 146 9. Wyntoon Estate design by Julia Morgan, after 1930.......................................147 10. Wyntoon Estate sketch by Julia Morgan, 1929..................................................147 11. Dismantling Santa Maria de Ovila.....................................................................148 12. Dismantling Santa Maria de Ovila.....................................................................148 13. Dismantling Santa Maria de Ovila.....................................................................149 viii 14. Dismantling Santa Maria de Ovila...................................................................... 149 15. Santa Maria church portal in Spain....................................................................150 16 Santa Maria church portal in San Francisco..................................................... 151 17. Plan for the Medieval Museum in Golden Gate Park.................................... 152 18. Original layout of Santa Maria de Ovila............................................................153 19. Medieval Museum: presentation drawing....................................................... 154 20. Medieval Museum: architect's model................................................................155 21. Monastery stones in Golden Gate Park..............................................................156 ix 1 INTRODUCTION In the aftermath of the 1906 earthquake and fire which destroyed at least eighty per cent of the city, San Francisco experienced a profusion of building activity continuing without interruption until the slow slide into the Great Depression started in 1929. No stranger to idiosyncratic architectural styles, the city constructed in only three decades a wide variety of buildings incorporating medieval designs and ornamentation. "Moorish Palace" architecture was chosen to contain a massive National Guard armory; a Gothic cathedral built of poured concrete which included a scaled-down replica of the Sainte-Chapelle in Paris was undertaken on Nob Hill; a Masonic Temple arose at Van Ness and Market disguised as a trecento Italian palazzo; and the stones from a monastery imported from Europe by William
Recommended publications
  • In Memory of Walter Cope, Architect of Bryn Mawr College
    Bryn Mawr College Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College Bryn Mawr College Publications, Special Books, pamphlets, catalogues, and scrapbooks Collections, Digitized Books 1908 In Memory of Walter Cope, Architect of Bryn Mawr College M. Carey Thomas Bryn Mawr College Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.brynmawr.edu/bmc_books Part of the Liberal Studies Commons, and the Women's History Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Custom Citation Thomas, M. Carey, In Memory of Walter Cope, Architect of Bryn Mawr College. (Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania: Bryn Mawr College, 1908). This paper is posted at Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College. https://repository.brynmawr.edu/bmc_books/3 For more information, please contact [email protected]. #JI IN MEMORY OF WALTER COPE ARCHITECT OF BRYN MAWR COLLEGE Address delivered by President M. Carey Thomas at a Memorial Service held at Bryn Mawr College, November 4, 1902. Published in the Bryn Mawr College Lantern, February, 1905. Reprinted by request, June, 1908. , • y • ./S-- I I .... ~ .. ,.,,­ \ \ " "./. "",,,, ~ / oj. \ .' ' \£,;i i f 1 l; 'i IN MEMORY OF \ WALTER COPE ARCHITECT OF BRYN MAWR COLLEGE Address delivered by President M. Carey Thomas at a Memorial Servic~ held at Bryn Mawr College, November 4, 1902. Published in the Bryn Mawr College Lantern, February, 1905. Reprinted by request, June, 1908. • T his memorial address was published originally in the Bryn Mawr College Lantern, Februar)I, I905, and is now reprinted by perntission of the Board of Editors of the Lantern, with slight verbal changesJ in response to the request of some of the many adm1~rers of the architectural beauty of Bryn 1\;[awr College, w'ho believe that it should be more widely l?nown than it is that the so-called American Collegiate Gothic was created for Bryn Mawr College by the genius of John Ste~vardson and ""Valter Cope.
    [Show full text]
  • Yale University a Framework for Campus Planning a Framework for Campus Planning
    FRAME WW ORK PLAN University Context ORK PLA N Structure Yale University A Framework for Campus Planning A Framework for Campus Planning FRAME W ORK PLAN Yale University A Framework for Campus Planning April 2000 Cooper, Robertson & Partners Architecture, Urban Design Copyright © 2000 by Yale University. All rights reserved, including the right to reproduce this document or portions thereof in any form whatsoever. For information contact: Yale University, Office of Facilities, University Planning. CONTENT S Foreword Introduction 1 Yale’s Urban Campus 7 New Haven Context 10 University Setting 16 Historic Development 16 Structure 26 Campus Systems 30 Uses 30 Built Form 33 Landscape and Open Space 36 Circulation 39 Pedestrian 39 Vehicular 42 Bicycles 45 Parking 46 Services 50 Signage 51 Lighting 56 Summary 58 Principles for the Future 61 Open Space and Development Opportunities 69 Core 72 Broadway/Tower Parkway 74 Hillhouse 76 Science Hill 78 Upper Prospect 80 Medical Center 82 Yale Athletic Fields 84 Additional Areas of Mutual Interest 86 Campus Framework Systems 89 Uses 92 Built Form 94 Landscape and Open Space 98 Circulation 115 Pedestrian 116 Vehicular 119 Bicycles 128 Parking 130 Signage 140 Lighting 144 Neighborhood Interface 148 Planning Considerations 153 Accessibility 156 A Perspective on Historic Preservation 158 Environmental Aspects 160 Direct Economic Impact of Yale 165 in New Haven and Connecticut Information Technology 170 Utilities 173 Major Initiatives 177 Glossary of Terms 184 Acknowledgments 185 FORE W ORD Thanks to the generosity of Yale’s alumni and friends, the University is in the midst of the largest building and renovation program since its transformation during the period between the World Wars.
    [Show full text]
  • BOMA Bulletin Marble West Mcmillan Electric Co
    SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2006 www.bomasf.org B OMA S a n F r a n c i s c o a d v a n c e s t h e c o m m e r c i a l r e a l e s t a t e i n d u s t r y t h r o u g h a d v o c a c y , p r o f e s s i o n a l d e v e l o p m e n t , a n d i n f o r m a t i o n e x c h a n g e Support our Associate Members: Buying BOMA Benefits Us All By Kathy Mattes, CPM, CCIM, Flynn Properties Inc. On the Inside good portion of our membership and involved with the local BOMAs there, has spent the past few months as well. If I’m doing business elsewhere working on their 2007 budgets. and don’t know the market but need some ELMER JOHNSON RECAP This process, arduous as it may seem, assistance, I know where to turn. And • •• 4 •• • reminds us where we spend our valuable that’s comforting. Adollars, and what expenditures give us the best return on investment. As a Principal Our Associate members are a great UILDING OUR 2006 B T BOMA member, I know the value received resource to BOMA San Francisco. • •• 6 •• • for my dues investment. I know that, as a Associate members contribute not only result of BOMA’s advocacy efforts, my dues and sponsorship support to our dues of approximately $0.01638 activities; they also actively CALENDAR per square foot per year saves serve on many committees that • •• 7 •• • 1.54 per square foot per year in do the work of our association.
    [Show full text]
  • Mckesson HBOC, Inc. Securities Litigation 99-CV-20743-US District
    US District Court Civil Docket as of February 8, 2013 Retrieved from the court on February 11, 2013 U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Jose) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 5:99-cv-20743-RMW Aronson, et al v. McKesson HBOC, Inc., et al Date Filed: 04/28/1999 Assigned to: Judge Ronald M. Whyte Date Terminated: 03/26/2008 Referred to: Magistrate Judge Patricia V. Trumbull Jury Demand: Both Demand: $0 Nature of Suit: 850 Case in other court: Ninth Circuit, 06-15987 Securities/Commodities Cause: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act Jurisdiction: Federal Question Plaintiff Andrew Aronson represented by D. Brian Hufford on behalf of himself and all others Pomerantz Haudek Block Grossman & similarly situated Gross LLP 100 Park Ave 26th Flr New York, NY 10017-5516 (212) 661-1100 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Daniel L. Berger Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann 1285 Avenue of the Americas 33rd Flr New York, NY 10019 (212) 554-1400 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Gerald J. Rodos Barrack Rodos & Bacine 2001 Market St 3300 Two Commerce Sq Philadelphia, PA 19103 (215) 963-0600 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Jeffrey W. Golan Barrack Rodos & Bacine 2001 Market St 3300 Two Commerce Sq Philadelphia, PA 19103 (215) 963-0600 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Joseph J. Tabacco , Jr. Berman DeValerio One California Street Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94111 415-433-3200 Fax: 415-433-6382 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Leonard Barrack Barrack Rodos & Bacine 2001 Market St 3300 Two Commerce Sq Philadelphia, PA 19103 (215) 963-0600 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Max W.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenneth Cardwell Collection 2010.-01
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8p55v9q No online items Kenneth Cardwell Collection 2010.-01 University of California, Berkeley. College of Environmental Design. Environmental Design Archives 230 Wurster Hall #1820 Berkeley, CA 94720-1820 [email protected] URL: http://archives.ced.berkeley.edu/ Kenneth Cardwell Collection 2010.-01 1 2010.-01 Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: University of California, Berkeley. College of Environmental Design. Environmental Design Archives Title: Kenneth Cardwell Collection creator: Cardwell, Kenneth H Identifier/Call Number: 2010.-01 Physical Description: 5 Linear feet4 cartons, 1 legal sized document box, 1 shoebox, 1 card file box Date (inclusive): 1941-1994 Access Statement Collection is open for research. Many of the Environmental Design Archives collections are stored offsite and advance notice is required for use. Publication Rights All requests for permission to publish, reproduce, or quote from materials in the collection should be discussed with the Curator. Preferred Citation [Identification of Item], Kenneth Cardwell Collection, Environmental Design Archives, University of California, Berkeley. Biographical Note Longtime resident of Berkeley, Kenneth H. Cardwell (1920 – 2010) was born in Los Angeles, California. He attended Occidental College for two years before transferring to UC Berkeley (UCB) in 1939 to study architecture. During World War II, Cardwell took a break in his studies and enlisted in the U.S. (Army) Air Force in the South Pacific from 1941-1945. After an honorable discharge, he returned to UC Berkeley and completed his BA in Architecture in 1947. He worked in the firms of Thomsen and Wilson of San Francisco; Michael Goodman, and Winfield Scott Wellington in Berkeley; Kolbeck, Cardwell & Christopherson in Oakland; and Hall, Goodhue, and Haisley.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Booklet At
    22nd Annual Interfaith Thanksgiving Prayer Breakfast The San Francisco Interfaith Council Celebrating 30 Years of Interfaith Collaboration in San Francisco Tuesday, November 26, 2019 7:00 am – 9:00 am Hotel Kabuki, San Francisco Honoring Rita R. Semel with the San Francisco Interfaith Council’s Lifetime Achievement Award Welcome to the 22nd Annual Interfaith Thanksgiving Prayer Breakfast The San Francisco Interfaith Council welcomes you to the 22nd Annual Interfaith Thanksgiving Prayer Breakfast. The Council exists to serve and give voice to our City’s 800 congregations, their respective judicatories, and the faith-based social service agencies that provide the safety net for San Francisco’s most vulnerable residents. The Annual Interfaith Thanksgiving Prayer Breakfast is our major event of the year, when representatives of the faith community, civic leaders and residents come together to give thanks for the gifts bestowed on our City and to pray for the well being of all of our residents. Each year at this breakfast, we shine the spotlight on the important contributions the religious community makes to the life of San Francisco. This year we celebrate the 30th anniversary of the San Francisco Interfaith Council (SFIC). A little known fact is that the SFIC was born as a result of the Loma Prieta earthquake. Just a year earlier, at the behest of Mayor Art Agnos, religious leaders responded to the burgeoning homeless crisis by initiating the Interfaith Winter Shelter, which just commenced its 31st year of feeding and sheltering 60-100 homeless people from November 24th through the end of March. Those same religious leaders were invited to a meeting at Calvary Presbyterian Church in the aftermath of the Loma Prieta earthquake to assist the humanitarian aid organization, Church World Service, in distributing vital funds to the most vulnerable residents displaced by the earthquake.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of a Campus (1756-2006)
    CHAPTER 3 THE EVOLUTION OF A CAMPUS (1756-2006) Princeton University has always been a dynamic institution, evolving from a two-building college in a rural town to a thriving University at the heart of a busy multifaceted community. The campus changed dramatically in the last century with the introduction of iconic “collegiate gothic” architecture and significant postwar expansion. Although the campus exudes a sense of permanence and timelessness, it supports a living institution that must always grow in pace with new academic disciplines and changing student expectations. The Campus Plan anticipates an expansion of 2.1 million additional square feet over ten years, and proposes to achieve this growth while applying the Five Guiding Principles. 1906 view of Princeton University by Richard Rummel. In this view, the original train station can be seen below Blair Hall, whose archway formed a ceremonial entrance to the campus for rail travelers. The station was moved to its current location in the 1920s. In this 1875 view, with Nassau Street in the The basic pattern of the campus layout, with foreground, Princeton’s campus can be seen rows of buildings following east-west walks Campus History occupying high ground overlooking the Stony which step down the hillside, is already clear in Brook, now Lake Carnegie, and a sweeping vista this view. Although many buildings shown here Starting as a small academic enclave in a of farms and open land which has now become were demolished over time to accommodate pastoral setting, the campus has grown the Route 1 corridor of shopping malls and office growth and changing architectural tastes, and in its 250 years to span almost 400 acres.
    [Show full text]
  • The Architectural Style of Bay Pines VAMC
    The Architectural Style of Bay Pines VAMC Lauren Webb July 2011 The architectural style of the original buildings at Bay Pines VA Medical Center is most often described as “Mediterranean Revival,” “Neo-Baroque,” or—somewhat rarely—“Churrigueresque.” However, with the shortage of similar buildings in the surrounding area and the chronological distance between the facility’s 1933 construction and Baroque’s popularity in the 17th and 18th centuries, it is often wondered how such a style came to be chosen for Bay Pines. This paper is an attempt to first, briefly explain the Baroque and Churrigueresque styles in Spain and Spanish America, second, outline the renewal of Spanish-inspired architecture in North American during the early 20th century, and finally, indicate some of the characteristics in the original buildings which mark Bay Pines as a Spanish Baroque- inspired building. The Spanish Baroque and Churrigueresque The Baroque style can be succinctly defined as “a style of artistic expression prevalent especially in the 17th century that is marked by use of complex forms, bold ornamentation, and the juxtaposition of contrasting elements.” But the beauty of these contrasting elements can be traced over centuries, particularly for the Spanish Baroque, through the evolution of design and the input of various cultures living in and interacting with Spain over that time. Much of the ornamentation of the Spanish Baroque can be traced as far back as the twelfth century, when Moorish and Arabesque design dominated the architectural scene, often referred to as the Mudéjar style. During the time of relative peace between Muslims, Christians, and Jews in Spain— the Convivencia—these Arabic designs were incorporated into synagogues and cathedrals, along with mosques.
    [Show full text]
  • November 23, 2004 Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary Federal
    November 23, 2004 By ELECTRONIC FILING Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 Twelfth Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: Written Ex Parte Presentation, Unbundled Access to Network Elements; Review ofthe Section 251 Unbundling Obligations ofIncumbent Local Exchange Carriers, WC Docket No. 04-313, CC Docket No. 01-338 Dear Ms. Dortch: On November 16, 2004, Verizon filed an ex parte letter in this docket, attaching a recent filing by MCI in a California state regulatory proceeding. As Verizon expressly acknowledges, MCI's pleading was submitted in response to a request by the California Public Utilities Commission "for comment on whether it should revise traditional retail regulation of ILECs.,,1 Verizon contends that this filing amounts to an admission by MCI "that the arguments it advanced in this proceeding no longer are valid,,2 - a claim that misstates the facts and ignores the context in which the California pleading was filed. Even a cursory review of the MCI submission shows that MCI did not contradict the facts or contentions that it has advanced in this proceeding concerning the state of intermodal competition. More fundamentally, the California proceeding and this Commission's pending Triennial Remand proceeding involve very different issues. The California Public Utilities Commission is examining in two concurrent proceedings the retail regulatory framework applicable to the state's foremost ILECs, and the application of intrastate switched access charges. In the instant proceeding, the FCC is charged with examining impairment in the absence ofthe availability of Letter from Dee May, Verizon, to Marlene H. Dortch, FCC, WC Docket No.
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Oakland 10K Projects Description (August 2010)
    Downtown Oakland 10K Projects Description (August 2010) PrOJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION Ownership Projects Clayton Court (700 Clay) City Walk (City Center T- 10) Harrison Street Senior Housing (1633 Harrison Street) COMPLETED PROJECTS Ownership Projects 8 Orchids (620-36 Broadway) 428 Alice (4th & Alice) 2300 Broadway Phase I (Broadway/23rd) Cathedral Building (1615 Broadway) Franklin 88 (900 Broadway) Gem Building Condos (485 8th Street) Landmark Place (1101-20 Martin Luther King, Jr. Way) Market Square I and II (801-27 Clay Street) New Market Lofts – “Safeway Building” (201 4th Street) The Ellington (222 Broadway) The Essex on Lake Merritt (One Lakeside Drive) The Golden Bridge Lofts (330-13th Street) The Marquee Lofts (1755 Broadway) The Midtown (426 27th Street) The Phoenix Lofts (737 2nd Street) The Sierra @ Jack London Square (311 Oak Street) The Telegraph (2401 Telegraph) Rental Projects 2355 Broadway Allegro at Jack London Square (240 3rd Street) Aqua Via (125 Second Street) 901 Jefferson Street Fox Courts (555-19th Street, 550-18th Street) Jackson Courtyard (Jackson and 14th Street) Madison @ 14th Telegraph Lofts – “Old Sears Building” (27th & Telegraph) The Bond (311-2nd Street) the Grand (100 Grand Avenue) The Landing – Legacy (99 Embarcadero) Thomas Berkley Square Rental & Ownership Projects 200 Second Street 288 Third (288 3rd Street) 1020 Jackson (1018-26 Jackson) Broadway Grand Phase I (Negherbon) Jade (1511 Jefferson) The Uptown Housing Project PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION Ownership Projects Clayton Court (700 Clay) Clayton Court, located at 7th and Clay Street, is developed by Clayton Court, LLC. This project offers 24 residential units and 2,443 square feet of retail space.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 History Walk Guidebook
    MILL VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY THIRTY SECOND ANNUAL WALK INTO HISTORY HORSE AND BUGGY DAYS Guidebook SUNDAY, MAY 24, 2009 Co-hosted with The Outdoor Art Club TO THE GUIDES: This is the 32nd year that the Mill Valley Historical Society has organized a Walk Into History thanks to the efforts of many volunteers working throughout the year as well as on the day of the Walk. Guides are special volunteers with a responsibility to provide a group of walkers with an interesting, informative, enjoyable and safe experience. Several guides have been leading these walks for many years. The fact that they continue to volunteer to be guides is an indication of their enjoyment and commitment. If this is your first year as a guide, we welcome you and hope you will find as much pleasure in learning and sharing the history of Mill Valley as the old timers do. Walk-Into-History Chair: Betsey Cutler Guidebook Editor: Chuck Oldenburg Researchers: Barbara Ford, Betty Goerke, Michael Lipman, Gene Stocking, Chuck Oldenburg TIPS FOR GUIDES Thank you for being a Walk-Into-History guide. Welcome to those who are leading a walk for the first time. We hope you enjoy the experience as much as the returning guides who tell us they look forward to the experience. To be a successful guide requires a commitment of time, energy and preparation. The objective is to provide good leadership and well-presented historical information. It is essential that you have the desire and devotion to offer your group an informative and enjoyable Walk-Into-History.
    [Show full text]
  • Artistic Geography and the Northern Jesuit Missions of New Spain
    Artistic Geography and the Northern Jesuit Missions of New Spain By Clara Bargellini Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México [email protected] (working paper, not be reproduced without the author’s permission) George Kubler´s seminal thoughts on artistic geography came out of his involvement with the art and architecture of the Hispanic New World. This paper examines a group of 17th and 18th century Jesuit missions in northern Mexico in order to expand our understanding of New World artistic geography, and also to explore the history of some geographic notions and their place in art historical discussions. Whereas Kubler was concerned with the transmission of styles, my interest here will be the movement of specific objects and individuals within a particular historical configuration. This will involve, of course, considerations about patronage and institutions, with some references to iconography, all of which ultimately has implications for the transmission of styles, as Kubler would no doubt have recognized. The missions in question were established in the first half of the 17th century by the Jesuits in the northern Tepehuan and Southeastern Tarahumara region, and were held by the Society until its 1767 expulsion from New Spain. From their arrival in 1572 the Jesuits focused on ministry among the native population of New Spain. Almost at once they began missionary activity among the indigenous populations in places near Mexico City. By 1580 they were established at Tepotzotlán learning native languages. In 1589 the Jesuits were among the legendary chichimecas at San Luis de la Paz, and two years later they were in Sinaloa, where they established an extraordinary system of missions about which we now have only documents and very sparse remains.
    [Show full text]