DOCSLIB.ORG

Does Intelligence Enhance Labor Productivity? Cross-Country Evidence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Social'Sciences'Research'Journal,'Volume'6,'Issue'4,'997115'(December'2017),'ISSN:'214775237' 99' ' Does Intelligence Enhance Labor Productivity? Cross-Country Evidence Prof.Dr. Cuneyt Koyuncu1 Doç.Dr. İsmail Hakkı İşcan2 Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi, Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Besides the other existing determinants of labor productivity in the literature, intelligence level may play important role in the explanation of the productivity level of labor in a country. In order to empirically examine this hypothesis, this study explores the influence of intelligence level on labor productivity by using thirteen distinct labor productivity indicators. The sample contains 157 countries’ cross-section data covering the periods between 2000 and 2013. The primary finding of the study implies a strong and statistically significant positive association between intelligence and labor productivity level. This result remains valid in all models having thirteen different proxies as dependent variable for labor productivity. This finding implies that countries with higher intelligence level experience higher labor productivity level. Key Words: Intelligence, Productivity, Cross-Section Data, Univariate Estimation, Multivariate Estimation. Zeka İşgücü Verimliliğini Artırır mı? Kesit Veri Kanıtı Literatürdeki işgücü verimliliğinin mevcut belirleyicileri yanında zeka, bir ülkedeki emeğin verimlilik seviyesini açıklamada önemli bir faktör olarak rol oynayabilir. Bu hipotezi ampirik olarak incelemek için bu çalışma, on üç ayrı emek verimlilik göstergesi kullanarak zeka seviyesinin emek üretkenliği üzerindeki etkisini araştırmaktadır. Çalışmanın örneklemi, 2000-2013 yılları arası 157 ülkenin kesitsel verilerini içermektedir. Çalışmanın başlıca bulgusu, zeka ve işgücü verimliliği seviyesi arasında güçlü ve istatiksel olarak anlamlı pozitif bir ilişkiyi göstermektedir. Bu sonuç, çalışmada işgücü verimliliği için kullanılan on üç farklı yakınlığa sahip bağımlı değişken için tüm modellerde geçerliliğini korumaktadır. Bu bulgu, daha yüksek zeka seviyesine sahip ülkelerin daha yüksek işgücü verimliliği seviyesine sahip olduklarını göstermektedir. Anahtar Kelimler : Zeka, Verimlilik, Yatay Kesit Veri, Tek Değişkenli Tahmin, Çok Değişkenli Tahmin. Introduction Traditional economic theories, along with internal dynamics like the political and institutional quality for economic growth, emphasize the importance of external factors such as geographical and historical factors. According to the liberal approach based on Smith and Hayek, a country will prosper a lot more by realizing the optimal distribution of the capital and labor by the virtue of economic freedom in internal dynamics. Empirical studies reveal that economic freedom and the increase in this freedom will bring a high level of economic welfare (Eliot A. Jamison, Dean T. Jamison, Eric A. Hanushek 2007; Heiner Rindermann 2008). East Asian countries which have ensured economic development largely by state influence constitute an important exception. On the other hand, historical and geographical advantages of countries (e.g., natural resources, openness to overseas trade, climatic conditions etc.) are determinants of economic growth as well. Some authors regard geography as the basic reason of regional and national economic developmental difference (Douglas A. Hibbs and Ola Olsson 2004; William D. Nordhaus 2006). Gerhard Meisenberg and Richard Lynn (2011) exemplifying Japan as ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' 1'Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, İktisat Bölümü Öğretim Üyesi, [email protected] ' 2'Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, İktisat Bölümü Öğretim Üyesi, [email protected]' Social'Sciences'Research'Journal,'Volume'6,'Issue'4,'997115'(December'2017),'ISSN:'214775237' 100' ' wealthy country and Nigeria as poor country state that some countries own more natural resources while some other countries are geographically closer to the world markets. In this sense, Nigeria is much richer than Japan in terms of natural resources and Japan is geographically quite far away to Europe's industrial centers. Therefore, Nigeria must be much richer than Japan. Meanwhile, institutional structuring in a society is brought about by individuals. Primary reasons for institutional quality and its economic consequences should be sought in physical, cognitive and behavioral characteristics of the human factor. In this respect, Japan is a rich, Nigeria yet is a poor country. Forasmuch as Japan (and countries like Singapore, Taiwan and New Zealand) possess “human capital” far more than Nigeria. The importance of human capital to a country is supported by the observation of big differences among the countries in terms of labor productivity (Meisenberg and Lynn 2011, p.422). Thus, the theories on human capital set forth that individuals’ competences and intelligence supremacies by means of the improvements in the technology constitute a key factor in determining a country's wealth (Heiner Rindermann and James Thompson 2011, p.754). Recent researches in economics and psychology show that the differences in mean national intelligence levels identified by IQ tests are a determinative factor in obtaining various national economic results. Various cross-country studies exhibit that the relationship between IQ and economic growth is actually strong. A well-defined psychological relation between the IQ and personal patience indicate high saving rates and top-tier institutional quality in the countries having high level of IQ average. It is proved via diverse methods of measurement that the countries with high levels of IQ average at the same time have a higher level of savings intensity (Garett Jones, 2011a). Importance of IQ in Economy IQ (Intelligence Quotient) is a special indicator that compares the performance of individuals through particular tests designed to identify and evaluate the differences in mental abilities (Nathan Brody 1999, p.19). Intelligence is dispersed unevenly throughout the countries and regions. In his study, Gerhard Meisenberg (2014) by using his own computed IQ averages puts forth the regional differences in terms of IQ averages around the world. Within this context, the IQ average is 70 at sub-Saharan Africa while it is 105 at Eastern Asia. Confucian Eastern Asia countries (China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore) are the countries with the highest IQ performance. These are followed by the Protestant Europe, mostly Europe-originated countries that speak English as the main language, the Catholic Europe, formerly socialist bloc member Eastern Europe countries, and eventually, the former Soviet Union. Countries having mid-level IQ performance are the Latin American countries; the Middle Eastern countries including predominantly Muslim countries from Morocco to Pakistan (inclusive North Africa), Pacific Islands (excluding Australia and New Zealand) and the South & South-East Asian countries from India to Indonesia and Philippines. The region with the lowest IQ level is the sub-Saharan Africa (Meisenberg 2014, p.54-55). The findings of the empirical studies indicate that individuals who have a higher IQ level in a society bear the capacity of generating a higher level of national income and are more innovative. Hence individuals with a lower IQ level contribute less to the economic development. For instance, by a verifying study of the “Smart Fraction” theory which assumes that talented and superior intelligence individuals are specifically suitable for social development, Heiner Rindermann, Michael Sailer and James Thompson (2009) reveals that societies with lower IQ levels are less influent at technological progress and in creating national income. Similarly, in the analysis conducted for 90 countries, Rindermann and Social'Sciences'Research'Journal,'Volume'6,'Issue'4,'997115'(December'2017),'ISSN:'214775237' 101' ' Thompson (2011) specified three groups with respect to cognitive adequacy levels, namely being “low”, “medium” and “high”. They compare the influence of each group’s intellectual skills on the gross domestic product. In consequence of the study, the significance of cognitive talent for the country’s wealth was found at high levels. Moreover, cognitive skills of a group can put forward the quality of the political and economic institutions in a country. The study finds cognitive sources indispensable for the development of capitalism and economic wealth. Studies implemented on the subject show that national IQ levels are saliently linked with a quite large area. The article of Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen (2012a) summarizes the conclusions reached by a set of studies conducted between 2002 and 2012 on the association between national IQ level and 244 subjects. Among those associated subjects which can be enumerated are the educational level, cognitive output, per capita income, economic growth, other various economic variables, crime, political institutions, health, demographic and sociological variables, geographic and climatic variables. Moreover, Garett Jones and W. Joel Schneider (2006) by implementing hundreds of growth regressions prove the close association between economic performance and national IQ levels. Even though the studies associating intelligence level with so many subjects (i.e., 244 subjects as indicated above) exist in the literature,
Recommended publications
  • ISIR Program 2012 FIN

    ISIR Program 2012 FIN

    Thirteenth Annual Conference of the International Society for Intelligence Research (ISIR) San Antonio, Texas, USA December 13–15, 2012 Sir Francis Galton San Antonio Marriott Riverwalk Hotel 889 East Market Street, San Antonio, TX 78205 Phone: 1-210-224-4555 Fax: 1-210-224-2754 Toll-free: 1-800-648-4462 Acknowledgements 2012 ISIR Board of Directors Linda Gottfredson, President University of Delaware David Lubinski, President Elect Vanderbilt University Earl Hunt, Past President University of Washington, Seattle Wendy Johnson, Board Member (exp. 2012) University of Edinburgh Keith Widaman, Board Member (exp. 2013) University of California, Davis Richard Haier, Board Member (exp. 2014), Secretary-Treasurer University of California, Irvine The Board would like to thank all the ISIR committees for their hard work in making this conference possible. We also thank Elsevier for helping to sponsor the Reception. i 2012 ISIR Committees Program Committee Yulia Kovas, Chair Yulia Dodonova, Paul Irwing, Wendy Johnson Conference Site Committee Thomas Coyle & Timothy Keith, Co-Chairs Distinguished Contributor Interview and Keynote Speaker Committee Sherif Karama, Chair Roberto Colom, Earl Hunt Holden Memorial Address on Science Writing Committee Linda Gottfredson, Chair James Thompson, Jonathan Wai Lifetime Achievement Award Committee Con Stough, Chair Wendy Johnson, Tim Keith, Aljoscha Neubauer, Jelte Wickerts Nominations and Elections Committee David Lubinski, Chair Tim Bates, Wendy Johnson, Mike McDaniel, Heiner Rindermann President’s Symposia Committee Richard Haier, Chair Linda Gottfredson Student Awards Committee Keith Widaman, Chair Roberto Colom, Matthew Reynolds Website Committee Linda Gottfredson, Chair James Thompson, Jonathan Wai ii In Memoriam Arthur R. Jensen 1923-2012 J. Philippe Rushton 1943-2012 iii Short schedule for ISIR 2012 (#) – Page of Abstract DAY 1: Thursday, Dec.
  • London Conference on Intelligence 2015

    London Conference on Intelligence 2015

    LONDON’S GLOBAL UNIVERSITY London Conference on Intelligence 2015 Prof Charles Spearman, UCL 1863 – 1945 London Conference on Intelligence 2015 Friday 8 May 2 pm Meeting speakers 3:50 Welcome and Introduction. J Thompson 4:00 By their words ye shall know them. MA Woodley of Menie, HBF Fernandes, AJ Figueredo, G Meisenberg 4:30 Evolution versus culture in international intelligence differences. H Rindermann 5:00 Tea 5:30 Plenary discussion with previous speakers 6:15 Guided London walk (12 minutes) to The Marquis Cornwallis, 31 Marchmont Street, London WC1N 1AP for your choice of pub drinks and gastro-pub food. Saturday 9 May 9:30 Spearman’s Hypothesis: Hypothesis or Law? M van den Hoek, J te Nijenhuis 10:00 Androgen Levels and K theory. E Dutton 10:30 Race and sex differences in occupational achievement. H Nyborg 11:00 Coffee 11:30 Spearman’s hypothesis tested on group differences in personality. J te Nijenhuis 12:00 Admixture in the Americas. J Fuerst, E Kirkegaard 12:30 Meta-analysis of Roma intelligence. D Jurasek, J te Nijenhuis, J Cvorovic 1:00 Plenary discussion with previous speakers 1:30 Lunch break 2:30 Darwin’s “Altruistic Words” Versus Wordsum “Easy Words” and “Hard Words”. AJ Figueredo, HBF Fernandes, M Woodley of Menie, G Madison 3:00 General and domain-related effects of prenatal methylmercury exposure. F Debes. 3:30 In chimpanzees, more g-loaded cognitive abilities are more heritable, evolvable, and exhibit more inter-individual variability. H Fernandes, MA Woodley of Menie, W Hopkins. 4:00 Tea 4:30 Intelligence is correlated with higher non-verbal ability.
  • Educational Policy and Cognitive Competences Heiner Rindermann

    Educational Policy and Cognitive Competences Heiner Rindermann

    Educational Policy and Cognitive Competences Heiner Rindermann and Stephen J. Ceci Educational Policy and Country Outcomes in International Cognitive Competence Studies Heiner Rindermann1 and Stephen J. Ceci2 1Institute of Psychology, Karl-Franzens-University Graz, Austria, and 2Department of Human Development, Cornell University Address correspondence to Heiner Rindermann, Institute of Psychology, Karl-Franzens- University Graz, Universitaetsplatz 2, A-8010 Graz, Austria; e-mail: [email protected]; or Stephen J. Ceci, Department of Human Development, Cornell University, Martha Van Rensselaer Hall, Ithaca, New York 14853-4401; e-mail: [email protected]. Educational policy and cognitive competences 2 ABSTRACT—Prior studies of students’ and adults’ cognitive competence have shown large differences between nations, equivalent to a difference of 5 to 10 years of schooling. These differences seem to be relevant because studies using different research paradigms have demonstrated that population-level cognitive abilities are related to a number of important societal outcomes, including productivity, democratization, and health. In this overview of transnational differences, we document a number of positive predictors of international differences in student competence, including the amount of preschool education, student discipline, quantity of education, attendance at additional schools, early tracking, the use of centralized exams and high stakes tests, and adult educational attainment. We found rather negative relationships for grade retention rates, age of school onset, and class size. Altogether, these results, when combined with the outcomes of earlier studies, demonstrate that international differences in cognitive competence can be explained in part by aspects of the respective countries’ educational systems and that these differences consequently can be reduced by reform of their educational policy.
  • [NEW BOOK] Race and Sex Differences in Intelligence and Personality: a Tribute to Richard Lynn - Stormfront

    [NEW BOOK] Race and Sex Differences in Intelligence and Personality: a Tribute to Richard Lynn - Stormfront

    [NEW BOOK] Race and Sex Differences in Intelligence and Personality: A Tribute to Richard Lynn - Stormfront Stormfront > General > Science, Technology and Race User Name Remember Me? [NEW BOOK] Race and Sex Differences in Intelligence and Personality: A Tribute to Richard Lynn Password Donate Register Blogs FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search Science, Technology and Race Genetics, eugenics, racial science and related subjects. LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes Yesterday, 04:03 PM #1 [NEW BOOK] Race and Sex Differences in Intelligence and Personality: A White Federalist Tribute to Richard Lynn Forum Member Join Date: Sep 2007 From the Ulster Institute comes this festschrift edited by Helmuth Nyborg, Posts: 500 Race and Sex Differences in Intelligence and Personality: A Tribute to Richard Lynn at Eighty: Quote: Originally Posted by Ulster Institute This collection of papers by eminent authors, first published in Personality and Individual Differences journal to mark the eightieth birthday of Richard Lynn, celebrates and contextualizes his lifetime contribution to knowledge in this controversial field of study. Authors include Gerhard Meisenberg. Heiner Rindermann and the late J. Phillippe Rushton. Also included are a preface by the editor and a conversation between Richard Lynn and Helmuth Nyborg. Reviewers' comments "In Richard Lynn's work we have the stuff Nobel prizes are made of." Helmuth Nyborg, University of Arhus, Denmark "In his long and brilliant career, Richard Lynn has made significant scientific contributions to many areas of intelligence research and differential psychology" Satoshi Kanazawa, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK "Richard Lynn's work to intellectual group differences is as Charles Darwin's was to biology." Donald Templer, Alliance International University (retired), California "Richard Lynn has considerably advanced studies on sex differences.
  • Download the UCL Investigation Into the London Conference On

    Download the UCL Investigation Into the London Conference On

    London Conference on Intelligence Report Forward UCL is today releasing a redacted version of the internal report into the London Conference on Intelligence. We have not released this before now because of the significant amount of personal information contained in the report. However, in the interests of ensuring transparency in the public interest, we are now releasing information from that report about the university’s relationship to that series of conferences, which ran on our campus, without our knowledge, between 2014-17, and which was proposed, but did not run, in 2018. The conferences were hosted by an honorary senior lecturer at UCL. The university was not informed in advance about the speakers and content of the conference series, as it should have been for the event to be allowed to go ahead. The conferences were booked and paid for as an external event and without our officials being told of the details. They were therefore not approved or endorsed by UCL. Following the disclosure that the London Conference on Intelligence had been held at UCL, UCL immediately set up an investigation team led by the head of the relevant Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, with three other senior academics. The information which is being released has been extracted from the university’s investigation report in order to remove the personal data of some individuals involved in the investigation – reflecting the need to balance the public interest in being transparent with the personal data rights of individuals. UCL views the right to debate and challenge ideas as fundamental to the nature of a university, and is committed to ensuring that free and open discussion can take place in an atmosphere of tolerance for different viewpoints.
  • Evolution Vs. Culture As Background Factors for International Intelligence Differences

    Evolution Vs. Culture As Background Factors for International Intelligence Differences

    Prof. Dr. Heiner Rindermann London Conference on Intelligence Chemnitz University of Technology, Germany May 8 to 10, 2015 [email protected] University College London www.tu-chemnitz.de/~hrin Friday, May 8, 2015, 4.30-5.00 pm http://emilkirkegaard.dk/LCI15 Chair: James Thompson Heiner Rindermann TU Chemnitz , Germany Evolution vs. culture as background factors for international intelligence differences Rindermann, LCI 2015, 8-5-15, Evolution vs. culture 1 of 40 Outline 1 The question............................................................... 3 2 What not.................................................................... 8 3 Evolutionary approach .................................................. 9 4 Cultural approach .......................................................24 5 Path models ...............................................................34 6 Conclusion.................................................................36 Rindermann, LCI 2015, 8-5-15, Evolution vs. culture 2 of 40 1 The question There are large differences in intelligence (ability to think), knowledge (relevant and true knowledge) and the intelligent use of this knowledge across nations . lowest highest equ to Study Country SAS IQ Country SAS IQ scho y TIMSS 2011 4 th grade Yemen 209 t≈56 Korea S 587 t≈113 t≈11 y PISA Math 2012 15 year o. Peru 368 t≈80 Singapo 573 t≈111 t≈6 y IQ Lynn & Vanhanen 2012 Malawi t≈233 60 Singapo t≈557 108.5 t≈16 y Hong Ko t≈553 108 SAS: S tudent Assessment Score (M=500, SD=100), uncorrected results, t≈ transformed in other scale, equ to scho y: difference equivalent pure school attendance years (35 points in SAS, 3 points in IQ, younger students larger, older students smaller increase). Rindermann, LCI 2015, 8-5-15, Evolution vs. culture 3 of 40 In different test measures the pattern is similar .
  • Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence Intelligence Research

    Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence Intelligence Research

    Intelligence 78 (2020) 101406 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Intelligence journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/intell Survey of expert opinion on intelligence: Intelligence research, experts' T background, controversial issues, and the media ⁎ Heiner Rindermanna, , David Beckera, Thomas R. Coyleb a Department of Psychology, Chemnitz University of Technology, Wilhelm-Raabe-Str. 43, D-09107 Chemnitz, Germany b Department of Psychology, University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Experts (Nmax = 102 answering) on intelligence completed a survey about IQ research, controversies, and the Expert survey media. The survey was conducted in 2013 and 2014 using the Internet-based Expert Questionnaire on Cognitive Intelligence Ability (EQCA). In the current study, we examined the background of the experts (e.g., nationality, gender, IQ-tests religion, and political orientation) and their positions on intelligence research, controversial issues, and the Media media. Most experts were male (83%) and from Western countries (90%). Political affiliations ranged from the Worldviews left (liberal, 54%) to the right (conservative, 24%), with more extreme responses within the left-liberal spectrum. Experts rated the media and public debates as far below adequate. Experts with a left (liberal, progressive) political orientation were more likely to have positive views of the media (around r = |.30|). In contrast, compared to female and left (liberal) experts, male and right (conservative) experts were more likely to endorse the validity of IQ testing (correlations with gender, politics: r = .55, .41), the g factor theory of intelligence (r = .18, .34), and the impact of genes on US Black-White differences (r = .50, .48).
  • The G-Factor of International Cognitive Ability Comparisons: the Homogeneity of Results in PISA, TIMSS, PIRLS and IQ-Tests Across Nations

    The G-Factor of International Cognitive Ability Comparisons: the Homogeneity of Results in PISA, TIMSS, PIRLS and IQ-Tests Across Nations

    European Journal of Personality Eur. J. Pers. 21: 667–706 (2007) Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/per.634 The g-Factor of International Cognitive Ability Comparisons: The Homogeneity of Results in PISA, TIMSS, PIRLS and IQ-Tests Across Nations HEINER RINDERMANN* Institute of Psychology, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Germany Abstract International cognitive ability and achievement comparisons stem from different research traditions. But analyses at the interindividual data level show that they share a common positive manifold. Correlations of national ability means are even higher to very high (within student assessment studies, r ¼ .60–.98; between different student assessment studies [PISA-sum with TIMSS-sum] r ¼ .82–.83; student assessment sum with intelligence tests, r ¼ .85–.86). Results of factor analyses indicate a strong g-factor of differences between nations (variance explained by the first unrotated factor: 94–95%). Causes of the high correlations are seen in the similarities of tests within studies, in the similarities of the cognitive demands for tasks from different tests, and in the common developmental factors at the individual and national levels including known environmental and unknown genetic influences. Copyright # 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Key words: intelligence; knowledge; education; student assessment; educational achievement; OECD; IEA INTRODUCTION The past century of empirical research on cognitive abilities has convincingly demonstrated their relevance for both individuals and societies across a wide variety of criteria. For individuals, both IQ (Schmidt & Hunter, 2004) and literacy (OECD, 2000) have been linked with job performance, longevity (Gottfredson & Deary, 2004; OECD, 2000), and low criminality (Herrnstein & Murray, 1994).
  • UK Sociologist Noah Carl and the Rise of the Far Right

    UK Sociologist Noah Carl and the Rise of the Far Right

    World Socialist Web Site wsws.org Attend June 9 public meeting in Cambridge: UK Sociologist Noah Carl and the rise of the far right 7 June 2019 The dismissal of sociologist Noah Carl from aforces have declared war on what they describe as prestigious research fellowship at the University of “cultural leftism,” attempting to revive previously Cambridge was a victory for students and academics discredited ideas associated with the worst crimes and who opposed the promotion of far-right pseudo-science horrors of the 20th century. at one of the world’s leading universities. The International Youth and Students for Social Carl was a presenter at the reactionary, eugenicist Equality will discuss the international and historical London Conference on Intelligence. Among his issues raised by events at Cambridge University. Our published works are ones alleging that anti-migrant speaker Thomas Scripps will provide a detailed rebuttal views are “reasonably accurate” as regards criminality. of the claims made by Carl’s defenders and will In another paper, he claims to correlate average propose a socialist perspective with which to take on regional IQ with economic prosperity, heavily implying the right-wing ideologues. that the former (measured intelligence) is the cause of Public meeting details the latter (prosperity). This is a naked justification for Sunday June 9, 2pm social inequality and imperialism. The Royal Cambridge Hotel, Hobson Suite Carl’s dismissal is not the end of the fight—it is only Trumpington Street the beginning. Cambridge, CB2 1PY Over the past month, an international campaign has (Tickets: £5 or £2 students/unwaged) been mounted by Carl’s far-right friends and allies to The Facebook event for the meeting is here.
  • London Conference on Intelligence Report Forward UCL Is Today

    London Conference on Intelligence Report Forward UCL Is Today

    London Conference on Intelligence Report Forward UCL is today releasing a redacted version of the internal report into the London Conference on Intelligence. We have not released this before now because of the significant amount of personal information contained in the report. However, in the interests of ensuring transparency in the public interest, we are now releasing information from that report about the university’s relationship to that series of conferences, which ran on our campus, without our knowledge, between 2014-17, and which was proposed, but did not run, in 2018. The conferences were hosted by an honorary senior lecturer at UCL. The university was not informed in advance about the speakers and content of the conference series, as it should have been for the event to be allowed to go ahead. The conferences were booked and paid for as an external event and without our officials being told of the details. They were therefore not approved or endorsed by UCL. Following the disclosure that the London Conference on Intelligence had been held at UCL, UCL immediately set up an investigation team led by the head of the relevant Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, with three other senior academics. The information which is being released has been extracted from the university’s investigation report in order to remove the personal data of some individuals involved in the investigation – reflecting the need to balance the public interest in being transparent with the personal data rights of individuals. UCL views the right to debate and challenge ideas as fundamental to the nature of a university, and is committed to ensuring that free and open discussion can take place in an atmosphere of tolerance for different viewpoints.
  • The Psychology Approach to Macroeconomics

    The Psychology Approach to Macroeconomics

    Prof. Dr. Heiner Rindermann American Economic Association, 2014 AEA Meeting Chemnitz University of Technology, Germany January 3 to 5, 2014 [email protected] Philadelphia, Marriott and Convention Center www.tu-chemnitz.de/~hrin Friday, January 3, 2014, 14:30-16:30 pm Pennsylvania Convention Center, 203-B Session: Cognitive Human Capital, Growth and Wealth – Chair: Heiner Rindermann & Rik Hafer Perspectives of Economics and Psychology Discussant: Susan M. Collins Garett Jones et al., Heiner Rindermann, Eric Hanushek et al., HR: 2., 14:50-15:06-15:10 Gerhard Meisenberg, James Heckman et al. Heiner Rindermann TU Chemnitz , Germany The Psychology Approach to Macroeconomics Rindermann, AEA 2014, 3-I-14, Psychology Approach 1 of 34 Outline 1 Cognitive human capital research .................................... 3 2 Psychometric intelligence test collection from Lynn and Vanhanen (2002-2012).................................................. 5 3 Student assessment and psychometric test combinations ......... 8 4 Economics and psychology: Terms...................................12 5 Economics and psychology: Measures...............................15 6 Economics and psychology: Analyses................................21 7 Causes of national ability differences...............................26 8 Development and improvement of national ability ..............28 Rindermann, AEA 2014, 3-I-14, Psychology Approach 2 of 34 1 Cognitive human capital research Human capital research, the use of psychological attributes to explain economically productive behavior, started in the late 1950s in economics. Individual level Jacob Mincer Mincer, J. (1958). Investment in human capital and (1922-2006) personal income distribution. Journal of Political Economy , 66 , 281-302. Theodore W. Schultz Schultz, Th. W. (1961). Investment in human (1902-1998) capital. American Economic Review , 51 , 1-17. Gary S. Becker Becker, G.
  • Program 10Th Annual Conference Hotel TRYP Centro Norte (Madrid, SPAIN)

    Program 10Th Annual Conference Hotel TRYP Centro Norte (Madrid, SPAIN)

    International Society for Intelligence Research ---December 17-19 2009--- Juan Huarte de San Juan Santiago Ramón y Cajal (1529-1588) (1852-1934) Juan Huarte de San Juan drew a His pioneering investigations of the remarkably cogent picture of microscopic structure of the brain were so individual differences in human original and influential that he is considered by thought. Huarte’s distinction between many to be the greatest neuroscientist of all problem solving by memory or by time [Jacobsen, Marcus (1993). Foundations of imagination is mirrored in neuroscience. Springer. pp. 237] contemporary theories that distinguish between the ability to do abstract reasoning and the ability to apply previously learned solution methods (E.B. Hunt, In Press, On human intelligence. Cambridge). Program 10th Annual Conference Hotel TRYP Centro Norte (Madrid, SPAIN) 1 Acknowledgements Organizers Roberto Colom & Mª Ángeles Quiroga Universidad Autónoma de Madrid & Universidad Complutense de Madrid Advisory Committee Thomas Bouchard University of Minnesota Ian Deary University of Edinburgh Douglas K Detterman Case Western Reserve University Linda Gottfredson University of Delaware Earl Hunt University of Washington, Seattle Wendy Johnson University of Edinburgh, University of Minnesota David Lubinski Vanderbilt University Robert Plomin University of London Con Stough Swinburne University of Technology Thanks to the Templeton Foundation for their support and Elsevier for sponsoring the reception. 2 International Society for Intelligence Research (ISIR) Program