Autobiography, Intimacy and Ethnography

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Autobiography, Intimacy and Ethnography 28 Autobiography, Intimacy and Ethnography DEBORAH REED-DANAHA Y Ethnographers have long displayed themselves and Lavie ct aI., 1993). A more general trend toward others as individuals through photol:,rraphs, bio­ 'retlexivity' in ethnographic writing (Cole, 1992), graphy, life history and autobiography. While dis­ influenced by both postmodemism and feminism, closure of intimate details of the lives of those also informs the increasing emphasis on self­ typically under the ethnographic gaze (the infor­ disclosure and self-display. Anthropologists and mants) has long been an acceptable and expected sociologists are becoming more explicit in their aspect of ethnographic research and writing, self­ exploration of the links between their own auto­ disclosure among ethnographers themselves has biographies and their ethnographic practices (Ellis been less acceptable and much less common. As and Bochner, 1996; Okely and Callaway, 1992). At Ruth Behar (1996: 26) has written, 'In anthro­ the same time, the 'natives' are increasingly telling pology, which historically exists to "give voice" to their own stories and have become ethnographers of others, there is no greater taboo than self-revelation'. their own cultures (Jones, 1970; Ohnuki-Tierney, Writing about the private lives of both ethno­ 1984). Researchers as well as their informants! graphcrs and their infornlants has been subject to collaborators have become aware of the politics of debates about the humanistic versus scientific valid­ representation and ofthe power relations inherent in ity of a focus on individuals. In recent decades, ethnographic accounts (Archetti, 1994; Behar and three prominent genres of writing have influenced Gordon, 1995; Cliftord, 1983; Fox, 1991; Harrison, thinking about the relationship between ethno­ 1997; Hymes, 1974; Marcus and Fischer, 19X6; graphy and the self of both the ethnographer and the Moore, 1994; Okely and Callaway, 1992; Strathern, 'native' informant: 1987). 111is growing trend in ethnographic writing that foregrounds self-narratives can be character­ native anthropology, in which people who were ized with the term 'autoethnography' - referring to formerly the subjects of ethnography become sclf-inscription on the part of the ethnographer, the authors of studies of their own groups either as 'native', or both (see Reed-Danahay, I 997b). professional anthropologists or indigenous In this chapter I will review ethnographic prac­ ethnographers; tices that use life writing, and the various issues of 2 ethnic autobiol:,rraphy: personal narratives in power and representation that these raise. This litera­ which ethnic or eultural identity is foregrounded ture review will depend most heavily on sources in in the life story; English or English translation, but will also include 3 autobiographical ethnography, in which profes­ French sources. This retlects my own linguistic limi­ sional researchers incorporate their own per­ tations and I apologize in advance tor my neglect of sonalnarratives into their ethnographic texts. ethnographic productions in other languages. This Social theory that emphasizes social agency and chapter aims to be interdisciplinary in its coverage practice influences this trend (Cohen, 1994; of ethnography, drawing from qualitative studies in Giddens, 1991), as do approaches of social and sociology, education and communication studies, cultural poetics (Fernandez and Herzfeld, 1998; but depends most heavily on writings in cultural 89 401{ HANDBOOK OF ETHNOGRAPHY anthropology. [ will tirst review approaches to life point of view of indigenous narrators' (1980: 229). history, and then tum to the autobiographical prac­ This standard view, while still prevalent among many tices of ethnographers themselves, before pointing researchers, has shifted ground somewhat in more to newer hybridizations in ethnographic writing. recent approaches that focus on interactions between ethnographer/interlocutor and autobiographer, and on issues of individual creativity and emotion. These LIFE HISTORY will be discussed later in the chapter. Brandes (19112) identifies 'ethnographic auto­ The methods of life history have been central to biography' as a form of tirst-person narrative, ethnography, particularly in the United States, but recorded and edited by a professionalanthropolo­ nevertheless remain in an ambiguous relationship gist (or someone in a related discipline). Texts of to participant observation fieldwork. Recent this sort are, he writes, usually non-Western narra­ approaches to the study of lives have introduced tives, and the anthropologist generally takes an concepts of life stories and personal narrative, interest in the psychosocial and developmental as well as 'ethnographic biography' (Herzfeld, stages of an individual's life, In advocating the use 1997b), to this tradition. While Watson and of life histories, Brandes argues that 'autobio­ Watson-Franke (19R5: I) describe the marginal role graphies, more than any other research tool, demon­ of life history in social science methods, Peacock strate that complex and subtle considerations and Holland write that 'life histories have become motivate individuals; people are not automatons, standbys in American ethnography' (1993). The responding blindly to the vague factors and torces neglect of life history in their review article on that are said to compel this or that type of action' cthnographic texts by Marcus and Cushman (l9R2), (1982: 190). Anticipating current trends, Brandes is perhaps most indicative of the position of this notes that 'ethnographers themselves are becoming methodological approach in the wider discipline. increasingly autobiographical in their presentation Bertaux and Kohli (19R4) remarked upon the of data, showing that the study of society is rooted retrenchment of autobiobTfaphical and biographical as much in the anthropologist's personality, and the methods in anthropology, particularly during the purely fortuitous circumstances into which he or 19705, and attributed this to a trend toward 'scicn­ she is thrust' (19R2: 190). In his essay, Brandcs also tism'. However, the same neglect by Marcus and discusses editing choices made, and other methodo­ Cushman, who can hardly be placed in the camp of logical issues in ethnographic autobiography. 'scicntism', shows the wider biases in ethnography Blauner (1987), who includes a useful literature that have worked against an emphasis on life stories. review of methods, also comments on methodo­ Scveral essays and entire volumes discuss logical issues of editing first-person narratives methods of life history and its relationship to ethno­ such as those of voice and selection. graphy. Recent writers such as Angrosino (19119), National trends in uses of life history have been Atkinson (1992), Denzin (19R9), Linde (1993), identified by various scholars. Angrosino defines Peacock and Holland (1993), Rosenwald and the Amcrican (as opposed to European) approach to Ochberg (1992), and Watson and Watson-rranke life history as one continually searching for the (19115) have identified various genrcs of writing and extraordinary individual who is representative of introduce typologies of terminologies in this field. their culture (especially Native Americans). This An example of this would be the distinction drawn person's life comes to express change and to illus­ between life history - elicited by another person trate factors of acculturation. In the European study and autobiography self· initiated (Watson and of life history, according to Angrosino, there is a Watson-Franke, 19115: 2). Watson and Watson­ more collective approach to personal narratives Franke further distinguish 'biography', which in order to show 'society as a whole' (intact). involves more rearranging of material than life Angrosino attributes these differences in approach history, so that it becomes a 'reeorder's report of the to historical factors, such as the intluence of nation­ subject's life' (191{5: 3), and 'diary' - life recorded alism on European approaches and to the intluence in an 'immediate perspective' (19R5: 3). Angrosino of psychology on American approaches (19119: (1989: 3) differentiates between genrcs of bio­ 15-16). In the collective approach, there is more graphy, autobiography, life history, life story and emphasis on the life cycle, on aging and on sociali­ personal narrative. zation features not unique to the individual. I Bruce Shaw (19110) suggests four elements in most There are several key histories and reviews of life detinitions of anthropological approaches to life history in ethnography to which the reader may history: '( I) they emphasize the importance of the turn. The earliest, and now classic, statement on teller's sociocultural milieu; (2) they focus methods of life history is Dollard (1935). This on the perspectives of one, unique individual; was followed by the also classic interdisciplinary (3) thcy have a time depth, so that a personal history 1945 collection The U~e oj' Personal Documents reveals also matters relevant to a region's or group's in History, Anthrop%lO; and Sociology, by local history; (4) they relate the local history from the L. Gottschallk, C. Kluckhohn and R. Angell. Two 90 AUTOBiOGRAPHY, It'vTI,HACYAND ETHNOGRAPHY 409 decades later, Langness provided a short but dense Nisa ([19RI]19R3), Caroline Brettell's work among 1965 text which contains a comprehensive review Portuguese migrant women (19R2) and on her own of the literature on anthropological uses of bio­ mother's life (1999),
Recommended publications
  • Entender El Contexto En El Que Surgió La Escuela Norteamericana De Antropología Como Una Reacción Crítica Al Evolucionismo Del Siglo XIX
    PROGRAMA DE ESTUDIOS UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA METROPOLITANA UNIDAD DIVISIÓN 1/3 IZTAPALAPA CIENCIAS SOCIALES Y HUMANIDADES NOMBRE DEL PLAN LICENCIATURA EN ANTROPOLOGÍA SOCIAL CLAVE UNIDAD DE ENSEÑANZA-APRENDIZAJE CREDITOS 222443 PARTICULARISMO Y EVOLUCIÓN CULTURAL 8 H. TEOR. TIPO 4 OBLIGATORIA SERIACIÓN H. PRAC. TRIMESTRE 0 II OBJETIVO (S) Que al final del curso el alumno o la alumna sea capaz de: Entender el contexto en el que surgió la escuela norteamericana de antropología como una reacción crítica al evolucionismo del siglo XIX. Conocer las propuestas teóricas y metodológicas que singularizan la perspectiva de Boas, y su escuela de pensamiento. Conocer derivaciones posteriores tales como la escuela de cultura y personalidad, así como sus alcances y limitaciones. Manejar la polémica, la reacción, y las nuevas perspectivas de la ecología cultural y el neo- evolucionismo. Analizar textos científicos e identificar sus tesis y preguntas centrales, su estrategia de argumentación y el manejo de fuentes por parte de los autores, así mismo, que sean capaces de manejar las habilidades básicas de expresión oral y escrita del español al exponer en el aula los resultados de sus indagaciones. CONTENIDO SINTÉTICO 1) La crítica de Boas a los usos y abusos del método comparativo y los determinismos raciales, geográficos y económicos de la escuela evolucionista como intentos de explicar la cultura. 2) La propuesta de Boas: enfatizar la singularidad histórica de cada cultura. 3) La consolidación de la escuela norteamericana. 4) La escuela cultura y personalidad. 5) Reintroducción del tema de la evolución a la escuela norteamericana. 6) La ecología cultural y una ciencia de la cultura.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2006
    Volume 17, Number 4 November 2006 PRESIDENT’S LETTER By Donald D. Stull [[email protected]] University of Kansas Anthropology, or any other subject, cannot avoid the context in which it is done. And we cannot afford to be out of touch with our times. Paul Bohannon n the November 2006 issue of Anthropology News, Elizabeth Tunstall announces that American anthropology suffers from a I“branding problem,” and she reports on preliminary research, which concludes, “the popular perceptions of anthropology are of a field engaged in the scientific study of primitive peoples (exoticism) or the distant past (dirt, bones, and Indiana Jones,” (Anthropology News 47(8): 17, 2006). More than a decade ago, Paula Rubel and Abraham Rosman observed that anthropology finds itself “in a stage of disintegration and fragmentation into myriad subdisciplines, subspecialties, and interest groups, all of which empha- size their differences and uniqueness rather than what they have in common” (Journal of Anthropo- logical Research 50(4):335, 1994). It still does. Anthropology, it would seem, is not only misunderstood by what we like to call “the Other,” but roiling with internecine dissension and turmoil. IN THIS ISSUE Page For several decades now, in fact, anthropology has suffered from what Paul Bohannon called a catastrophe SfAA President’s Letter 1 in its epigenetic landscape (American Anthropologist Obituaries 82(3):512, 1980). An epigenetic landscape is “one that Foster, George 3 changes and moves because of the very activity that Lantis, Margaret 16 goes on within it. A catastrophe takes place when the 2007 Annual Meetings in Tampa 17 epigenetic landscape changes to the point that one of Grappling with Tough Issues 19 its valleys, wherein social action has been flowing, is Rethinking Cosmopolitan 21 blocked or diverted to new courses.” Such valleys are Minding Your Business 24 called chreods.
    [Show full text]
  • Dancing in the Altiplano: K’Iche’ Maya Culture in Motion in Contemporary Highland Guatemala
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Dancing in the Altiplano: K’iche’ Maya Culture in Motion in Contemporary Highland Guatemala A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Art History, Theory, and Criticism by Rhonda Beth Taube Committee in Charge: Professor Grant Kester, Chair Professor Steve Fagin Professor Lesley Stern Professor Roberto Tejada Professor Eric Van Young 2009 Copyright Rhonda Beth Taube, 2009 All rights reserved The Dissertation of Rhonda Beth Taube is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Chair University of California, San Diego 2009 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page……………………………………………………………..……………iii Table of Contents………………………………………………………….……………iv List of Figures………………………………..………………………………...……… vii Acknowledgements……………… ...………………………..………………………….x Curriculum Vitae……………………..………………………………………………..xiv Abstract…………………………………………………………………… ... ……..…xix Introduction to K’iche’ Maya Highland Guatemala….……………………….…...….1 Introduction to the Region and Momostenango…………………………….…….4 The Dances of Momostenango……………………………………………………9 Disfraces dances and media imagery…………………………...….…….11 Research questions on the subject of the disfraces………………………12 Previous Studies on Maya Dance and Other Festival Performances ………...….16 A Brief Summary of the Chapters……...………………………………………..18 Chapter 1: Don Roberto …………………………….…………………………....…...20 Dance as Stories That Mediate the Effects of “Others”…………………….....…21 My place
    [Show full text]
  • Ishi and Anthropological Indifference in the Last of His Tribe
    International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 3 No. 11; June 2013 "I Heard Your Singing": Ishi and Anthropological Indifference in the Last of His Tribe Jay Hansford C. Vest, Ph.D. Enrolled member Monacan Indian Nation Direct descendent Opechanchanough (Pamunkey) Honorary Pikuni (Blackfeet) in Ceremonial Adoption (June 1989) Professor of American Indian Studies University of North Carolina at Pembroke One University Drive (P. O. Box 1510) Pembroke, NC 28372-1510 USA. The moving and poignant story of Ishi, the last Yahi Indian, has manifested itself in the film drama The Last of His Tribe (HBO Pictures/Sundance Institute, 1992). Given the long history of Hollywood's misrepresentation of Native Americans, I propose to examine this cinematic drama attending historical, ideological and cultural axioms acknowledged in the film and concomitant literature. Particular attention is given to dramatic allegorical themes manifesting historical racism, Western societal conquest, and most profoundly anthropological indifference, as well as, the historical accuracy and the ideological differences of worldview -- Western vis-à-vis Yahi -- manifest in the film. In the study of worldviews and concomitant values, there has long existed a lurking "we" - "they" proposition of otherness. Ever since the days of Plato and his Western intellectual predecessors, there has been an attempt to locate and explicate wisdom in the ethnocentric ideological notion of the "civilized" vis-à-vis the "savage." Consequently, Plato's thoughts are accorded the standing of philosophy -- the love of wisdom -- while Black Elk's words are the musings of the "primitive" and consigned to anthropology -- the science of man. Philosophy is, thusly, seen as an endeavor of "civilized" Western man whom in his "science of man" or anthropological investigation may record the "ethnometaphysics" of "primitive" or "developing" cultures.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    Edward P. Dozier: A history of Native- American discourse in anthropology. Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Norcini, Marilyn Jane. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 07/10/2021 19:56:29 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/187248 INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript ,has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete mannscript and there are mjssjng pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note wiD indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and contim1jng from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy.
    [Show full text]
  • Markets in Africa Edited by Paul Bohannan and George Dalton
    442 The Developing Economies reader very unsatisfied when he finds that in spite of this the author does not mention this aspect of economic relations with foreign countries. Again, in connection with the policy of "self-reliance" which is emphasized as being one of the principal causes of the present economic expansion, must it not be impossible to give a sufficient explanation of the matter without making an analysis of economic relations with foreign countries in the period up to 1957 ? Thirdly, the reader is left with doubts, in that the description of the various economic institutions does not appear to give overall coverage. This is so in the case of the descriptions of the taxation system and financial institutions. We would like an account of these matters which would be a little more persuasive and concrete. If these matters cannot all be dealt with in a book which is only an outline account designed as an introduction to the subject, references to the relevant literature should be provided in order to facilitate research. Lastly, we hope that a properly synthesized analytic and descriptive accouut of the period since 1958, a new rich in chauge, will be uuder� taken by the Chinese students of the subject at the earliest opportunity. As need hardly be said this uew period, although beset with natural disasters and other economic difficulties, is a most interesting period in the course of which, on the other hand, a new line of socialist construction peculiar to China and extremely original has been produced and put into effect, leaving in its train a large number of problems which still remain to be solved.
    [Show full text]
  • Melville Herskovits
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES M E L V I L L E J E A N H ERSKOVITS 1895—1963 A Biographical Memoir by J O S E P H C . G REENB ERG Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 1971 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON D.C. MELVILLE JEAN HERSKOVITS September 10,1895-February 26,1963 BY JOSEPH H. GREENBERG ELVILLE j. HERSKOVITS was, at the time of his death, the M acknowledged dean of African studies in the United States as well as a major figure in the world of anthropology. His achievements were impressive, whether measured in terms of field work, scholarly publications, organizational activities, or the training of students. His outstanding personal character- istics were a well-nigh boundless energy and enthusiasm for every aspect of his multifarious activities and a wide range of scientific and humanistic interests. His wife, Frances, a profes- sional anthropologist in her own right, was his lifelong collab- orator and co-worker whose contributions are not to be meas- ured solely from the list of works which she co-authored with him. Melville Jean Herskovits was born in Bellefontaine, Ohio, on September 10, 1895; he lived there until the age of ten. He subsequently lived in El Paso, Texas, and Erie, Pennsylvania, where he graduated from Erie High School in 1912. In 1915 he entered the University of Cincinnati and the Hebrew Union College, the latter for theological studies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Anthropological Ideas
    PERSPECTIVES: AN OPEN INTRODUCTION TO CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY SECOND EDITION Nina Brown, Thomas McIlwraith, Laura Tubelle de González 2020 American Anthropological Association 2300 Clarendon Blvd, Suite 1301 Arlington, VA 22201 ISBN Print: 978-1-931303-67-5 ISBN Digital: 978-1-931303-66-8 http://perspectives.americananthro.org/ This book is a project of the Society for Anthropology in Community Colleges (SACC) http://sacc.americananthro.org/ and our parent organization, the American Anthropological Association (AAA). Please refer to the website for a complete table of contents and more information about the book. Perspectives: An Open Introduction to Cultural Anthropology by Nina Brown, Thomas McIlwraith, Laura Tubelle de González is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted. Under this CC BY-NC 4.0 copyright license you are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. 1313 THE HISTORY OF ANTHROPOLOGICAL IDEAS Laura Nader, The University of California, Berkeley Learning Objectives • Identify the central concepts of cultural anthropology and describe how each of these concepts contributed to the development of the discipline. • Describe the role anthropologists play in examining cultural assumptions and explain how the anthropological perspective differs from both ethnocentrism and American exceptionalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropology MA.Pdf
    Request to Establish M.A. in Anthropology UNC Charlotte THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA Request for Authorization to Establish a New Degree Program INSTRUCTIONS: Please submit five copies of the proposal to the Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs, UNC Office of the President. Each proposal should include a 2-3 page executive summary. The signature of the Chancellor is required. Date April 10, 2008 Constituent Institution: The University of North Carolina at Charlotte CIP Discipline Specialty Title: Anthropology CIP Discipline Specialty Number: 45.0201 Level: B # M ## 1st Prof # D ## Exact Title of Proposed Program: Master’s Degree in Anthropology Exact Degree Abbreviation (e.g. B.S., B.A., M.A., M.S., Ed.D., Ph.D.): M.A. Does the proposed program constitute a substantive change as defined by SACS? Yes No a) Is it at a more advanced level than those previously authorized? Yes No j b) Is the proposed program in a new discipline division? Yes No j Proposed date to establish degree program (allow at least 3-6 months for proposal review): month August year 2009 Do you plan to offer the proposed program away from campus during the first year of operation? Yes No If so, complete the form to be used to request establishment of a distance learning program and submit it along with this request. Request to Establish M.A. in Anthropology UNC Charlotte TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page ...................................................................................................................................1 Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Anthropology Comes Home: a Brief History of the Ethnographic Study of Law John M
    University of North Carolina School of Law Masthead Logo Carolina Law Scholarship Repository Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 1993 Legal Anthropology Comes Home: A Brief History of the Ethnographic Study of Law John M. Conley University of North Carolina School of Law, [email protected] William M. O'Barr Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/faculty_publications Part of the Law Commons Publication: Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LEGAL ANTHROPOLOGY COMES HOME: A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE ETHNOGRAPHIC STUDY OF LAW John M. Conley* William M. O'Barr** I. INTRODUCTION Anthropology is a relative newcomer to the ranks of the social sci- ences. It began to emerge as an autonomous field in the second half of the nineteenth century when a diverse array of scholars and speculators converged around such issues as the defining characteristics of humanity and the nature and origins of human society. In the topics they chose to pursue, the way they framed their questions, and the strategies they used to find answers, these nascent anthropologists were strongly influenced by the disciplines from which they had come. An early and significant example of this interdisciplinary influence is the famous Cambridge Anthropological Expedition to the Torres Straits of 1898.1 The expedition was organized by Alfred Cort Haddon, a zool- ogy professor who had a brief and unsuccessful career in his father's printing business.2 Its purpose was to comprehensively survey the physi- cal characteristics, language, culture, and thought patterns of the in- habitants of the straits separating New Guinea and Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Intellectual Roots of Key Anthropologists
    SELECTIONS FROM ASSESSING CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY Robert Borofsky, editor (1994) New York: McGraw-Hill FREDRIK BARTH is currently Research Fellow under the Norwegian Ministry of Culture and Professor of Anthropology at Emory University. He has previously taught at the universities of Oslo and Bergen, and as a visitor at various American departments of anthropology. He has carried out research in a number of areas, starting in the Middle East with a focus on tribal politics and ecology. His best known works from this period are: Political Leadership among Swat Pathans (1959), Nomads of South Persia (1961), Models of Social Organization (1964), and the edited work Ethnic Groups and Boundaries (1969). Later, he has also done fieldwork in New Guinea and Southeast Asia, and among his publications are Ritual and Knowledge among the Baktaman of New Guinea (1975) and Cosmologies in the Making (1987). A monograph entitled Balinese Worlds will appear in 1993. "After a wartime childhood in Norway, I started at the University of Chicago with an interest in paleontology and human evolution. But the active and rich teaching program of Fred Eggan, Sol Tax, Robert Redfield and others broadened my intellectual horizon and led, after an interlude on a dig in Iraq with Bob Braidwood, to my choice of social anthropology as the focus of my work. My foundations derived indirectly from Radcliffe-Brown, who had taught my teachers during the 1930s. "Like many of my Chicago cohort, I went on to further studies in England. I chose the L.S.E. Autobiographies: 2 and developed a life-long association with Raymond Firth and, even more importantly, with Edmund Leach, whom I later followed to Cambridge for my Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Laura Nader: a Life of Teaching, Investigation, Scholarship and Scope
    Regional Oral History Office University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California LAURA NADER Laura Nader: A Life of Teaching, Investigation, Scholarship and Scope Interviews conducted by Lisa Rubens and Samuel Redman in 2013 Copyright © 2014 by The Regents of the University of California Since 1954 the Regional Oral History Office has been interviewing leading participants in or well-placed witnesses to major events in the development of Northern California, the West, and the nation. Oral History is a method of collecting historical information through tape-recorded interviews between a narrator with firsthand knowledge of historically significant events and a well-informed interviewer, with the goal of preserving substantive additions to the historical record. The tape recording is transcribed, lightly edited for continuity and clarity, and reviewed by the interviewee. The corrected manuscript is bound with photographs and illustrative materials and placed in The Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley, and in other research collections for scholarly use. Because it is primary material, oral history is not intended to present the final, verified, or complete narrative of events. It is a spoken account, offered by the interviewee in response to questioning, and as such it is reflective, partisan, deeply involved, and irreplaceable. ********************************* All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreement between The Regents of the University of California and Laura Nader dated August 28, 2013. The manuscript is thereby made available for research purposes. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are reserved to The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley.
    [Show full text]