DOCSLIB.ORG

Anthropology MA.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Request to Establish M.A. in Anthropology UNC Charlotte THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA Request for Authorization to Establish a New Degree Program INSTRUCTIONS: Please submit five copies of the proposal to the Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs, UNC Office of the President. Each proposal should include a 2-3 page executive summary. The signature of the Chancellor is required. Date April 10, 2008 Constituent Institution: The University of North Carolina at Charlotte CIP Discipline Specialty Title: Anthropology CIP Discipline Specialty Number: 45.0201 Level: B # M ## 1st Prof # D ## Exact Title of Proposed Program: Master’s Degree in Anthropology Exact Degree Abbreviation (e.g. B.S., B.A., M.A., M.S., Ed.D., Ph.D.): M.A. Does the proposed program constitute a substantive change as defined by SACS? Yes No a) Is it at a more advanced level than those previously authorized? Yes No j b) Is the proposed program in a new discipline division? Yes No j Proposed date to establish degree program (allow at least 3-6 months for proposal review): month August year 2009 Do you plan to offer the proposed program away from campus during the first year of operation? Yes No If so, complete the form to be used to request establishment of a distance learning program and submit it along with this request. Request to Establish M.A. in Anthropology UNC Charlotte TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page ...................................................................................................................................1 Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................2 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................3 I. Description of the Program ...............................................................................................5 II. Justification for the Program .............................................................................................6 III. Program Requirements and Curriculum .........................................................................12 IV. Faculty.............................................................................................................................15 V. Library.............................................................................................................................17 VI. Facilities and Equipment.................................................................................................18 VII. Administration ................................................................................................................19 VIII. Accreditation ...................................................................................................................19 IX. Supporting Fields ............................................................................................................19 X. Additional Information ...................................................................................................20 XI. Budget .............................................................................................................................20 XII. Evaluation Plans ..............................................................................................................20 XIII. Reporting Requirements .................................................................................................22 Appendices: #1 Letters of Support #2 Outside Reviews #3 Two-year plan for teaching assignments #4 Proposed Course Descriptions #5 Faculty Curricula Vitae #6 Complete Proposed Curriculum #7 Assessment of library resources (by Bridgette Sanders, UNC Charlotte social science reference librarian) #8 Budget 2 Request to Establish M.A. in Anthropology UNC Charlotte Executive Summary The University of North Carolina at Charlotte proposes to establish a Master of Arts in Anthropology with two tracks: a track in General Anthropology and a track in Applied Anthropology. Anthropology is an integrative and comparative field of scholarship devoted to discovering and analyzing the range of human biological and cultural variation, as well as to understanding the historical, ecological, and sociopolitical contexts in which human diversities and commonalities develop. Traditionally, the field encompasses and integrates cultural anthropology (the study of living communities), linguistic anthropology (the study of the human use of language), biological anthropology (the study of humans’ primate relatives, human evolution, and modern biological variation), and archaeology (the study of the culture of past communities). Anthropologists often use the term “holistic” to label this integrative approach. While anthropology is often associated with the study of non-western societies, the current discipline takes as its domain the full range of human experience, including the modern world and the world of humans’ primate relatives. The most rapidly growing area of the field is applied anthropology: the application of anthropological methods and knowledge to contemporary problems. The M.A. in Anthropology degree program will provide students with the theoretical and methodological skills to gather, record, analyze, and communicate about human activity patterns in the past and present, and at local and global levels. he proposed M.A. in Anthropology is designed to meet the needs of two kinds of students: those seeking to prepare for doctoral education in anthropology or other fields and those seeking post-baccalaureate skills for employment in a wide range of occupations in our increasingly inter-cultural and international world education, government, program planning and evaluation, healthcare, media, the non-profit sector, and business. Coursework in the program will build skills in data collection, analysis, and interpretation, and the application of anthropological perspectives to both theoretical and applied problems. The University of North Carolina at Charlotte has offered a B.A. in Anthropology since 1977 and currently (Fall 2007) enrolls about 75 majors and 25 minors. While numerous public institutions and several private institutions in North Carolina offer the B.A. in Anthropology, only four institutions offer graduate degrees in this field (and none west of the Triangle region). So, the program will expand opportunities across the state. Graduate education in Anthropology will contribute to the strategic academic plans for both the University and the College of Arts and Sciences, which call for expanding graduate programming; emphasizing interdisciplinary and culturally diverse scholarship; and serving regional, state, and national needs. A graduate program in anthropology is uniquely placed to address these priorities in creative ways. The M.A. program will also support the University’s mission to internationalize the educational experience. All current UNC Charlotte anthropology faculty have significant cross-cultural and comparative research experience, which currently includes expertise in Western Europe and Eurasia, Africa, Latin America, the Caribbean, and the Middle East, as well as with ethnic and confessional minorities in Europe and the United States. The proposed M.A. in Anthropology contributes to the goals of expanding students’ global awareness (Initiative A) in the plans for UNC Tomorrow. In addition, the Applied Anthropology track will contribute to Initiatives D (Community Development), E (Health), and G (Outreach and Engagement) by linking faculty and student to community through collaborative projects on important regional issues, including health care and education in a multi-cultural community, understanding cultural diversity, and overcoming racism and poverty. At the baccalaureate level, the Anthropology Program has a well-established tradition of supporting interdisciplinary programs at UNC Charlotte through cross-listing of courses, occasional advising of students, and contributions to advisory committees. Among our faculty are individuals active in graduate 3 Request to Establish M.A. in Anthropology UNC Charlotte Liberal Studies, Latin American Studies, Islamic Studies, Women’s Studies, International Studies, and Gerontology. In addition, we have collaborative relationships with Religious Studies, Africana Studies, Communication Studies, History, and Political Science. We envision continuing these collaborations – through cross-listing of courses, enrolling students of different programs, and establishing collaborative research – at the M.A. level. Support letters from departments and interdisciplinary programs are found in Appendix #1. The M.A. in Anthropology requires 33 credit hours, including 15 hours of core courses (two courses taken by all students and three courses chosen from a short list). Students in the General Anthropology track are expected to complete a thesis, while students in the Applied Anthropology track are expected to complete a research-based practicum in an outside agency and prepare and orally defend a project report. Library holdings are adequate for the program. The electronic resources of the J. Murrey Atkins Library, along with monograph and paper periodical holdings, provide appropriate resources for graduate students. The Anthropology program also benefits from library resources in related interdisciplinary programs, such as International Studies, Latin American Studies, and others. The M.A. in Anthropology will be administered
Recommended publications
  • November 2006

    November 2006

    Volume 17, Number 4 November 2006 PRESIDENT’S LETTER By Donald D. Stull [[email protected]] University of Kansas Anthropology, or any other subject, cannot avoid the context in which it is done. And we cannot afford to be out of touch with our times. Paul Bohannon n the November 2006 issue of Anthropology News, Elizabeth Tunstall announces that American anthropology suffers from a I“branding problem,” and she reports on preliminary research, which concludes, “the popular perceptions of anthropology are of a field engaged in the scientific study of primitive peoples (exoticism) or the distant past (dirt, bones, and Indiana Jones,” (Anthropology News 47(8): 17, 2006). More than a decade ago, Paula Rubel and Abraham Rosman observed that anthropology finds itself “in a stage of disintegration and fragmentation into myriad subdisciplines, subspecialties, and interest groups, all of which empha- size their differences and uniqueness rather than what they have in common” (Journal of Anthropo- logical Research 50(4):335, 1994). It still does. Anthropology, it would seem, is not only misunderstood by what we like to call “the Other,” but roiling with internecine dissension and turmoil. IN THIS ISSUE Page For several decades now, in fact, anthropology has suffered from what Paul Bohannon called a catastrophe SfAA President’s Letter 1 in its epigenetic landscape (American Anthropologist Obituaries 82(3):512, 1980). An epigenetic landscape is “one that Foster, George 3 changes and moves because of the very activity that Lantis, Margaret 16 goes on within it. A catastrophe takes place when the 2007 Annual Meetings in Tampa 17 epigenetic landscape changes to the point that one of Grappling with Tough Issues 19 its valleys, wherein social action has been flowing, is Rethinking Cosmopolitan 21 blocked or diverted to new courses.” Such valleys are Minding Your Business 24 called chreods.
  • Dancing in the Altiplano: K’Iche’ Maya Culture in Motion in Contemporary Highland Guatemala

    Dancing in the Altiplano: K’Iche’ Maya Culture in Motion in Contemporary Highland Guatemala

    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Dancing in the Altiplano: K’iche’ Maya Culture in Motion in Contemporary Highland Guatemala A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Art History, Theory, and Criticism by Rhonda Beth Taube Committee in Charge: Professor Grant Kester, Chair Professor Steve Fagin Professor Lesley Stern Professor Roberto Tejada Professor Eric Van Young 2009 Copyright Rhonda Beth Taube, 2009 All rights reserved The Dissertation of Rhonda Beth Taube is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Chair University of California, San Diego 2009 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page……………………………………………………………..……………iii Table of Contents………………………………………………………….……………iv List of Figures………………………………..………………………………...……… vii Acknowledgements……………… ...………………………..………………………….x Curriculum Vitae……………………..………………………………………………..xiv Abstract…………………………………………………………………… ... ……..…xix Introduction to K’iche’ Maya Highland Guatemala….……………………….…...….1 Introduction to the Region and Momostenango…………………………….…….4 The Dances of Momostenango……………………………………………………9 Disfraces dances and media imagery…………………………...….…….11 Research questions on the subject of the disfraces………………………12 Previous Studies on Maya Dance and Other Festival Performances ………...….16 A Brief Summary of the Chapters……...………………………………………..18 Chapter 1: Don Roberto …………………………….…………………………....…...20 Dance as Stories That Mediate the Effects of “Others”…………………….....…21 My place
  • Autobiography, Intimacy and Ethnography

    Autobiography, Intimacy and Ethnography

    28 Autobiography, Intimacy and Ethnography DEBORAH REED-DANAHA Y Ethnographers have long displayed themselves and Lavie ct aI., 1993). A more general trend toward others as individuals through photol:,rraphs, bio­ 'retlexivity' in ethnographic writing (Cole, 1992), graphy, life history and autobiography. While dis­ influenced by both postmodemism and feminism, closure of intimate details of the lives of those also informs the increasing emphasis on self­ typically under the ethnographic gaze (the infor­ disclosure and self-display. Anthropologists and mants) has long been an acceptable and expected sociologists are becoming more explicit in their aspect of ethnographic research and writing, self­ exploration of the links between their own auto­ disclosure among ethnographers themselves has biographies and their ethnographic practices (Ellis been less acceptable and much less common. As and Bochner, 1996; Okely and Callaway, 1992). At Ruth Behar (1996: 26) has written, 'In anthro­ the same time, the 'natives' are increasingly telling pology, which historically exists to "give voice" to their own stories and have become ethnographers of others, there is no greater taboo than self-revelation'. their own cultures (Jones, 1970; Ohnuki-Tierney, Writing about the private lives of both ethno­ 1984). Researchers as well as their informants! graphcrs and their infornlants has been subject to collaborators have become aware of the politics of debates about the humanistic versus scientific valid­ representation and ofthe power relations inherent in ity of a focus on individuals. In recent decades, ethnographic accounts (Archetti, 1994; Behar and three prominent genres of writing have influenced Gordon, 1995; Cliftord, 1983; Fox, 1991; Harrison, thinking about the relationship between ethno­ 1997; Hymes, 1974; Marcus and Fischer, 19X6; graphy and the self of both the ethnographer and the Moore, 1994; Okely and Callaway, 1992; Strathern, 'native' informant: 1987).
  • Society for Humanistic Anthropology President's Annual Report to the American Anthropological Association

    Society for Humanistic Anthropology President's Annual Report to the American Anthropological Association

    Society for Humanistic Anthropology President's Annual Report to the American Anthropological Association Prepared by Alma Gottlieb (outgoing president) January 5, 2005 (This report describes activities of the Society for Humanistic Anthropology from November 24, 2003 to December 19, 2004) Table of Contents President's Report . .2 Appendices I Contract with the University of California Press . 13 II Revised Mission Statement for Anthropology and Humanism . 28 III Proposal Submitted by SHA to the ISI Web of Science . .29 IV Flyers Announcing 2004 SHA Competitions . 33 V SHA Members Agreeing to be Listed on the AAA Web Site for Journalist Contact . 38 VI SHA Workshops at 2004 AAA Meetings Planned for San Francisco . .40 VII Report of Our Outreach Activities Prepared for AAA Education Committee . .42 The Officers for the Year of the Report President: Alma Gottlieb (2002-2004), [email protected] Ass't to the President: Alison Goebel, [email protected] Vice-President and President-Elect: Jeanne Simonelli (2002-2004), [email protected] Immediate Past President: Daniel Ingersoll (2001-2002), [email protected] Treasurer: Frederic W. Gleach, [email protected] Secretary: Vilma Santiago-Irizarry (2003-2006), [email protected] Co-Editors for SHA column in AN: Frederic W. Gleach, [email protected] and Vilma Santiago-Irizarry, [email protected] Editor of Anthropology and Humanism: Edith Turner (2003-2006), [email protected] Board Members: Roy Richard Grinker (2003-2005), [email protected] Carol Delaney (2003-2005), [email protected] Michelle Johnson (2003-2006), [email protected] Duncan Earle (2003-2006), [email protected] Robbie Davis-Floyd (2003-2006), [email protected] Graduate Student Board Members: Maria I.
  • Reclaiming Applied Anthropology: Its Past, Present, and Future

    Reclaiming Applied Anthropology: Its Past, Present, and Future

    BARBARA RYLKO-BAUER MERRILL SINGER JOHN VAN WILLIGEN Reclaiming Applied Anthropology: Its Past, Present, and Future ABSTRACT Growing concerns about anthropology’s impact in both academia and the broader social arena have led to calls for more “public” and more relevant anthropology. In this article, we expand on these exhortations, by calling for systematic joining of critical social theory with application and pragmatic engagement with contemporary problems. We argue for the repositioning of applied anthropology as a vital component of the broader discipline and suggest that it should serve as a framework for constructing a more engaged anthropology. In revisiting disciplinary history and critiques of applied anthropology, we demonstrate the central role that application has played throughout anthropology’s evolution, address common misconceptions that serve as barriers to disciplinary integration, examine the role of advocacy in relation to greater engagement as well as the relationship of theory to practice, and conclude with an assessment of the diverse work that is subsumed under the inclusive rubric of “anthropology in use.” [Keywords: applied anthropology, engagement, history of anthropology, anthropological practice, advocacy] VER THE PAST DECADE, there has been increasing frameworks for the discipline’s goal of pragmatic engage- Oawareness within anthropology in general about the ment. In laying out our argument, we first address some need for a more engaged role in both academia and the pub- of the myths and misconceptions surrounding application, lic arena, as well as calls for greater relevance with regard by revisiting (and, thus, reclaiming) disciplinary history as to addressing social problems and the structures that pro- well as demonstrating the complexity and diversity of work duce and maintain them.
  • Anthropology's Fitness

    Anthropology's Fitness

    ANTHROPOLOGY’S FITNESS: COMPETITIVE CHALLENGES AND POTENTIAL PATHS FORWARD By CHAD R. MAXWELL A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2017 © 2017 Chad R. Maxwell To those who helped push me ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to sincerely thank Dr. Chris McCarty for leading my committee and Dr. Russ Bernard for partnering with him. Without their coaching, pushing, and cheerleading, this day would never have come. Sometimes they believed in me more than I believed in myself and for that my gratitude is significant. I would also like to thank Dr. Jeff Johnson and Dr. Rich Lutz for serving on my committee. These scholars offered great insight, perspective, and collaboration as well. A large part of this work is connected with my career experience in business, advertising, media, and marketing. Dr. Russ Bernard equipped me with the technical skills, anthropological knowledge, and business savvy to help me be successful in that space. He was a consistent career advocate and I’m very thankful for that. A special appreciation goes to my departed friend and anthropologist Dr. Brigitte Jordan. Her wisdom, strength, and spirit continue to be an inspiration to this date. I miss you. I also extend gratitude to the University of Florida Anthropology department for supporting me during my academic pursuits in terms of curriculum exposure, scholarly support, and funding. I am also thankful to Dr. Mark House and Dr. Anna Vick who provided either direct data help or acted as great soundboards during this process.
  • Anthropology's World

    Anthropology's World

    Anthropology’s World Hannerz 00 pre 1 25/05/2010 14:35 Anthropology, Culture and Society Series Editors: Professor Vered Amit, Concordia University and Dr Jon P. Mitchell, University of Sussex Published titles include: Home Spaces, Street Styles: Culture and Well-Being: Contesting Power and Identity Anthropological Approaches to in a South African City Freedom and Political Ethics LesLie J. Bank eDiteD By aLBerto Corsin Jiménez On the Game: Cultures of Fear: Women and Sex Work A Critical Reader sophie Day eDiteD By uLi Linke anD DanieLLe taana smith Slave of Allah: Zacarias Moussaoui vs the USA Fair Trade and a Global Commodity: katherine C. Donahue Coffee in Costa Rica peter LuetChForD A World of Insecurity: Anthropological Perspectives The Will of the Many: on Human Security How the Alterglobalisation Movement eDiteD By thomas eriksen, is Changing the Face of Democracy eLLen BaL anD osCar saLemink marianne maeCkeLBerGh A History of Anthropology The Aid Effect: thomas hyLLanD eriksen Giving and Governing in anD Finn sivert nieLsen International Development eDiteD By DaviD mosse anD DaviD Lewis Ethnicity and Nationalism: Anthropological Perspectives Cultivating Development: Third Edition An Ethnography of Aid Policy thomas hyLLanD eriksen and Practice DaviD mosse Globalisation: Studies in Anthropology Anthropology, Art and Cultural eDiteD By thomas hyLLanD eriksen Production maruška svašek Small Places, Large Issues: An Introduction to Social Race and Ethnicity in Latin America and Cultural Anthropology Second edition Third Edition peter waDe thomas hyLLanD eriksen Race and Sex in Latin America What is Anthropology? peter waDe thomas hyLLanD eriksen Anthropology at the Dawn Anthropology, Development and of the Cold War: the Post-Modern Challenge The Influence of Foundations, katy GarDner anD DaviD Lewis McCarthyism and the CIA eDiteD By Dustin m.
  • AN ANTHROPOLOGY of ANTHROPOLOGY by ROB BOROFSKY

    AN ANTHROPOLOGY of ANTHROPOLOGY by ROB BOROFSKY

    AN ANTHROPOLOGY OF ANTHROPOLOGY by ROB BOROFSKY ENDORSEMENTS BY 35 PROMINENT ANTHROPOLOGISTS FROM AUSTRALIA, CANADA, FRANCE, NORWAY, UNITED KINGDOM, and UNITED STATES Anthropology as a discipline should have far greater impact on the world today, both in its elucidation of the nature of humanity, and its application to specific human needs. To this end, Borofsky provides a trenchant critique of current ideology and practice in anthropology. In calling for increased attention to Public Anthropology, he explains why anthropologists have not fulfilled their promise in improving the human understanding and the human condition. This book is both an incisive critique of anthropology and a call for action. It should be widely read and taken to heart. WILLIAM O. BEEMAN, Co-President of the Association for the Anthropology of Policy; Professor of Anthropology, University of Minnesota • • • Borofsky’s call for a public anthropology with real human, political and intellectual stakes is inspiring. His rich documentation of the history of anthropology and his critique of the propensity for elite academics to pursue irrelevant trendy theory that advances careers instead of useful, knowledge helpful to the people anthropologists study is right on point. Please read this book and engage with the world on behalf of social justice. PHILIPPE BOURGOIS, Director of the Center for Social Medicine and Humanities, UCLA; Author of In Search of Respect: Selling Crack in El Barrio and Righteous Dopefiend • • • This book is a timely call to action for all of us who want to see anthropology become a discipline that engages the public and does good in the world. Please read it; please teach it to your students! NINA BROWN, Professor of Anthropology, Community College of Baltimore County- Essex; Editor, Anthropology of Work Review; Co-Editor, Perspectives: An Open Invitation to Cultural Anthropology • • • An Anthropology of Anthropology is a work of clarity and impressive scholarship.
  • Guide to AAA Records 1904-2005

    Guide to AAA Records 1904-2005

    GUIDE TO THE AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION RECORDS, 1904-2005 [Bulk Dates, 1915-1996] With information dating back to 1902 and forward to 2007 Alan L. Bain November 14, 2014 National Anthropological Archives Smithsonian Institution 4210 Silver Hill Road Suitland, Maryland 20746 301-238-1310 www.nmnh.si.edu/naa 1 Table of Contents Administrative History .................................................................................................................................. 4 Scope And Content Note ............................................................................................................................ 10 Restrictions ................................................................................................................................................. 13 Extent .......................................................................................................................................................... 13 Provenance .................................................................................................................................................. 13 Related Collections ..................................................................................................................................... 13 Processing Note .......................................................................................................................................... 14 Language of Materials Note .......................................................................................................................